1
|
Baghirov H. Mechanisms of receptor-mediated transcytosis at the blood-brain barrier. J Control Release 2025; 381:113595. [PMID: 40056994 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.113595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2024] [Revised: 02/09/2025] [Accepted: 02/28/2025] [Indexed: 04/15/2025]
Abstract
In receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT) of large therapeutics across the blood-brain barrier (BBB), the construct - a macromolecule or a larger carrier with therapeutic payload - binds a protein on brain capillary endothelial cells (BCEC), with internalization and release into the brain parenchyma. The construct's internalization into, trafficking across and release from, but also possible entrapment within BCEC are affected by its engineered properties whose optimization has helped derive insights into transport mechanisms at BCEC. Furthermore, advances in multi-omics, as well as large-scale screening and directed evolution campaigns have helped identify new targets for RMT at BCEC. In this perspective, I raise and reflect on some fundamental questions one can arrive at by comparing the engineered properties of BBB-targeted constructs and the properties of different target proteins. These questions concern the underlying, transcytosis-promoting factors that the optimization of constructs' engineered properties appears to converge on, the precise role of target proteins in RMT, the different mechanisms through which these targets may mediate construct trafficking, and the tentative criteria for target selection on BCEC. Based on these considerations I propose several scenarios and strategies to interfere with the construct's trafficking for more efficient internalization, transport through the endosomal network toward the abluminal membrane, and release from BCEC, both for smaller macromolecules and for larger carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Habib Baghirov
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, 20500 Turku, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ahmed AA, Alegret N, Almeida B, Alvarez-Puebla R, Andrews AM, Ballerini L, Barrios-Capuchino JJ, Becker C, Blick RH, Bonakdar S, Chakraborty I, Chen X, Cheon J, Chilla G, Coelho Conceicao AL, Delehanty J, Dulle M, Efros AL, Epple M, Fedyk M, Feliu N, Feng M, Fernández-Chacón R, Fernandez-Cuesta I, Fertig N, Förster S, Garrido JA, George M, Guse AH, Hampp N, Harberts J, Han J, Heekeren HR, Hofmann UG, Holzapfel M, Hosseinkazemi H, Huang Y, Huber P, Hyeon T, Ingebrandt S, Ienca M, Iske A, Kang Y, Kasieczka G, Kim DH, Kostarelos K, Lee JH, Lin KW, Liu S, Liu X, Liu Y, Lohr C, Mailänder V, Maffongelli L, Megahed S, Mews A, Mutas M, Nack L, Nakatsuka N, Oertner TG, Offenhäusser A, Oheim M, Otange B, Otto F, Patrono E, Peng B, Picchiotti A, Pierini F, Pötter-Nerger M, Pozzi M, Pralle A, Prato M, Qi B, Ramos-Cabrer P, Genger UR, Ritter N, Rittner M, Roy S, Santoro F, Schuck NW, Schulz F, Şeker E, Skiba M, Sosniok M, Stephan H, Wang R, Wang T, Wegner KD, Weiss PS, Xu M, Yang C, Zargarian SS, Zeng Y, Zhou Y, Zhu D, Zierold R, Parak WJ. Interfacing with the Brain: How Nanotechnology Can Contribute. ACS NANO 2025; 19:10630-10717. [PMID: 40063703 PMCID: PMC11948619 DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.4c10525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2024] [Revised: 12/19/2024] [Accepted: 12/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2025]
Abstract
Interfacing artificial devices with the human brain is the central goal of neurotechnology. Yet, our imaginations are often limited by currently available paradigms and technologies. Suggestions for brain-machine interfaces have changed over time, along with the available technology. Mechanical levers and cable winches were used to move parts of the brain during the mechanical age. Sophisticated electronic wiring and remote control have arisen during the electronic age, ultimately leading to plug-and-play computer interfaces. Nonetheless, our brains are so complex that these visions, until recently, largely remained unreachable dreams. The general problem, thus far, is that most of our technology is mechanically and/or electrically engineered, whereas the brain is a living, dynamic entity. As a result, these worlds are difficult to interface with one another. Nanotechnology, which encompasses engineered solid-state objects and integrated circuits, excels at small length scales of single to a few hundred nanometers and, thus, matches the sizes of biomolecules, biomolecular assemblies, and parts of cells. Consequently, we envision nanomaterials and nanotools as opportunities to interface with the brain in alternative ways. Here, we review the existing literature on the use of nanotechnology in brain-machine interfaces and look forward in discussing perspectives and limitations based on the authors' expertise across a range of complementary disciplines─from neuroscience, engineering, physics, and chemistry to biology and medicine, computer science and mathematics, and social science and jurisprudence. We focus on nanotechnology but also include information from related fields when useful and complementary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah
A. A. Ahmed
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
- Department
of Physics, Faculty of Applied Science, Thamar University, Dhamar 87246, Yemen
| | - Nuria Alegret
- Biogipuzkoa
HRI, Paseo Dr. Begiristain
s/n, 20014 Donostia-San
Sebastián, Spain
- Basque
Foundation for Science, Ikerbasque, 48013 Bilbao, Spain
| | - Bethany Almeida
- Department
of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York 13699, United States
| | - Ramón Alvarez-Puebla
- Universitat
Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
- ICREA, 08010 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anne M. Andrews
- Department
of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University
of California, Los Angeles, Los
Angeles, California 90095, United States
- Neuroscience
Interdepartmental Program, University of
California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
- Department
of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience
& Human Behavior, and Hatos Center for Neuropharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
- California
Nanosystems Institute, University of California,
Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
| | - Laura Ballerini
- Neuroscience
Area, International School for Advanced
Studies (SISSA/ISAS), Trieste 34136, Italy
| | | | - Charline Becker
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Robert H. Blick
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Shahin Bonakdar
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
- National
Cell Bank Department, Pasteur Institute
of Iran, P.O. Box 1316943551, Tehran, Iran
| | - Indranath Chakraborty
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
- School
of Nano Science and Technology, Indian Institute
of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, India
| | - Xiaodong Chen
- Innovative
Center for Flexible Devices (iFLEX), Max Planck − NTU Joint
Lab for Artificial Senses, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore
| | - Jinwoo Cheon
- Institute
for Basic Science Center for Nanomedicine, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
- Advanced
Science Institute, Yonsei University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
- Department
of Chemistry, Yonsei University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
| | - Gerwin Chilla
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - James Delehanty
- U.S. Naval
Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375, United States
| | - Martin Dulle
- JCNS-1, Forschungszentrum
Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Epple
- Inorganic
Chemistry and Center for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CeNIDE), University of Duisburg-Essen, 45117 Essen, Germany
| | - Mark Fedyk
- Center
for Neuroengineering and Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, California 95817, United States
| | - Neus Feliu
- Zentrum
für Angewandte Nanotechnologie CAN, Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Polymerforschung IAP, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Miao Feng
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rafael Fernández-Chacón
- Instituto
de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Hospital
Universitario Virgen del Rocío/Consejo Superior de Investigaciones
Científicas/Universidad de Sevilla, 41013 Seville, Spain
- Departamento
de Fisiología Médica y Biofísica, Facultad de
Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla, CIBERNED,
ISCIII, 41013 Seville, Spain
| | | | - Niels Fertig
- Nanion
Technologies GmbH, 80339 München, Germany
| | | | - Jose A. Garrido
- ICREA, 08010 Barcelona, Spain
- Catalan
Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), CSIC and BIST, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
| | | | - Andreas H. Guse
- The Calcium
Signaling Group, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Norbert Hampp
- Fachbereich
Chemie, Universität Marburg, 35032 Marburg, Germany
| | - Jann Harberts
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
- Drug Delivery,
Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
- Melbourne
Centre for Nanofabrication, Victorian Node
of the Australian National Fabrication Facility, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
| | - Jili Han
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hauke R. Heekeren
- Executive
University Board, Universität Hamburg, 20148 Hamburg Germany
| | - Ulrich G. Hofmann
- Section
for Neuroelectronic Systems, Department for Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, 79108 Freiburg, Germany
- Faculty
of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Malte Holzapfel
- Zentrum
für Angewandte Nanotechnologie CAN, Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Polymerforschung IAP, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Yalan Huang
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Patrick Huber
- Institute
for Materials and X-ray Physics, Hamburg
University of Technology, 21073 Hamburg, Germany
- Center
for X-ray and Nano Science CXNS, Deutsches
Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, 22607 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Taeghwan Hyeon
- Center
for Nanoparticle Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
- School
of Chemical and Biological Engineering, and Institute of Chemical
Processes, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Sven Ingebrandt
- Institute
of Materials in Electrical Engineering 1, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Marcello Ienca
- Institute
for Ethics and History of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health, Technische Universität München (TUM), 81675 München, Germany
| | - Armin Iske
- Fachbereich
Mathematik, Universität Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yanan Kang
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Dae-Hyeong Kim
- Center
for Nanoparticle Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
- School
of Chemical and Biological Engineering, and Institute of Chemical
Processes, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Kostas Kostarelos
- Catalan
Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), CSIC and BIST, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
- Centre
for Nanotechnology in Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine &
Health and The National Graphene Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United
Kingdom
| | - Jae-Hyun Lee
- Institute
for Basic Science Center for Nanomedicine, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
- Advanced
Science Institute, Yonsei University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
| | - Kai-Wei Lin
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sijin Liu
- State Key
Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
- University
of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Xin Liu
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yang Liu
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Lohr
- Fachbereich
Biologie, Universität Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Volker Mailänder
- Department
of Dermatology, Center for Translational Nanomedicine, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes-Gutenberg,
Universität Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Max Planck
Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55129 Mainz, Germany
| | - Laura Maffongelli
- Institute
of Medical Psychology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Saad Megahed
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
- Physics
Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar
University, 4434104 Cairo, Egypt
| | - Alf Mews
- Fachbereich
Chemie, Universität Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marina Mutas
- Zentrum
für Angewandte Nanotechnologie CAN, Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Polymerforschung IAP, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Leroy Nack
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nako Nakatsuka
- Laboratory
of Chemical Nanotechnology (CHEMINA), Neuro-X
Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
(EPFL), Geneva CH-1202, Switzerland
| | - Thomas G. Oertner
- Institute
for Synaptic Neuroscience, University Medical
Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Offenhäusser
- Institute
of Biological Information Processing - Bioelectronics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
| | - Martin Oheim
- Université
Paris Cité, CNRS, Saints Pères
Paris Institute for the Neurosciences, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Ben Otange
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ferdinand Otto
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Enrico Patrono
- Institute
of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 12000, Czech Republic
| | - Bo Peng
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Filippo Pierini
- Department
of Biosystems and Soft Matter, Institute
of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Monika Pötter-Nerger
- Head and
Neurocenter, Department of Neurology, University
Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maria Pozzi
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Arnd Pralle
- University
at Buffalo, Department of Physics, Buffalo, New York 14260, United States
| | - Maurizio Prato
- CIC biomaGUNE, Basque Research and Technology
Alliance (BRTA), 20014 Donostia-San
Sebastián, Spain
- Department
of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy
- Basque
Foundation for Science, Ikerbasque, 48013 Bilbao, Spain
| | - Bing Qi
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
- School
of Life Sciences, Southern University of
Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China
| | - Pedro Ramos-Cabrer
- CIC biomaGUNE, Basque Research and Technology
Alliance (BRTA), 20014 Donostia-San
Sebastián, Spain
- Basque
Foundation for Science, Ikerbasque, 48013 Bilbao, Spain
| | - Ute Resch Genger
- Division
Biophotonics, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing
(BAM), 12489 Berlin, Germany
| | - Norbert Ritter
- Executive
Faculty Board, Faculty for Mathematics, Informatics and Natural Sciences, Universität Hamburg, 20345 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marten Rittner
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sathi Roy
- Zentrum
für Angewandte Nanotechnologie CAN, Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Polymerforschung IAP, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
- Department
of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute
of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, India
| | - Francesca Santoro
- Institute
of Biological Information Processing - Bioelectronics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
- Faculty
of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Nicolas W. Schuck
- Institute
of Psychology, Universität Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
- Max Planck
Research Group NeuroCode, Max Planck Institute
for Human Development, 14195 Berlin, Germany
- Max Planck
UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Schulz
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Erkin Şeker
- University
of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States
| | - Marvin Skiba
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Sosniok
- Zentrum
für Angewandte Nanotechnologie CAN, Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Polymerforschung IAP, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Holger Stephan
- Helmholtz-Zentrum
Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical
Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Ruixia Wang
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
- Deutsches
Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, 22607 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ting Wang
- State Key
Laboratory of Organic Electronics and Information Displays & Jiangsu
Key Laboratory for Biosensors, Institute of Advanced Materials (IAM),
Jiangsu National Synergetic Innovation Center for Advanced Materials
(SICAM), Nanjing University of Posts and
Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China
| | - K. David Wegner
- Division
Biophotonics, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing
(BAM), 12489 Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul S. Weiss
- Department
of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University
of California, Los Angeles, Los
Angeles, California 90095, United States
- California
Nanosystems Institute, University of California,
Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
- Department
of Bioengineering, University of California,
Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
- Department
of Materials Science and Engineering, University
of California, Los Angeles, Los
Angeles, California 90095, United States
| | - Ming Xu
- State Key
Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
- University
of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Chenxi Yang
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Seyed Shahrooz Zargarian
- Department
of Biosystems and Soft Matter, Institute
of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Yuan Zeng
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yaofeng Zhou
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dingcheng Zhu
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
- College
of Material, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory of
Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology, Ministry of Education,
Key Laboratory of Organosilicon Material Technology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
| | - Robert Zierold
- Fachbereich
Physik, Universität Hamburg, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ciftci F, Özarslan AC, Kantarci İC, Yelkenci A, Tavukcuoglu O, Ghorbanpour M. Advances in Drug Targeting, Drug Delivery, and Nanotechnology Applications: Therapeutic Significance in Cancer Treatment. Pharmaceutics 2025; 17:121. [PMID: 39861768 PMCID: PMC11769154 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17010121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2024] [Revised: 01/01/2025] [Accepted: 01/04/2025] [Indexed: 01/27/2025] Open
Abstract
In the 21st century, thanks to advances in biotechnology and developing pharmaceutical technology, significant progress is being made in effective drug design. Drug targeting aims to ensure that the drug acts only in the pathological area; it is defined as the ability to accumulate selectively and quantitatively in the target tissue or organ, regardless of the chemical structure of the active drug substance and the method of administration. With drug targeting, conventional, biotechnological and gene-derived drugs target the body's organs, tissues, and cells that can be selectively transported to specific regions. These systems serve as drug carriers and regulate the timing of release. Despite having many advantageous features, these systems have limitations in thoroughly treating complex diseases such as cancer. Therefore, combining these systems with nanoparticle technologies is imperative to treat cancer at both local and systemic levels effectively. The nanocarrier-based drug delivery method involves encapsulating target-specific drug molecules into polymeric or vesicular systems. Various drug delivery systems (DDS) were investigated and discussed in this review article. The first part discussed active and passive delivery systems, hydrogels, thermoplastics, microdevices and transdermal-based drug delivery systems. The second part discussed drug carrier systems in nanobiotechnology (carbon nanotubes, nanoparticles, coated, pegylated, solid lipid nanoparticles and smart polymeric nanogels). In the third part, drug targeting advantages were discussed, and finally, market research of commercial drugs used in cancer nanotechnological approaches was included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatih Ciftci
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf University, Istanbul 34015, Turkey
- Department of Technology Transfer Office, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf University, Istanbul 34015, Turkey
| | - Ali Can Özarslan
- Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul 34320, Turkey;
| | - İmran Cagri Kantarci
- Department of Bioengineering, Faculty of Chemistry-Metallurgy, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul 34210, Turkey;
| | - Aslihan Yelkenci
- Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul 34668, Turkey;
| | - Ozlem Tavukcuoglu
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Hamidiye Pharmacy, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul 34668, Turkey;
| | - Mansour Ghorbanpour
- Department of Medicinal Plants, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Arak University, Arak 38156-8-8349, Iran;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cordeiro Josino LP, da Penha Valente RP, de Souza da Silva ML, Alves CN, Lima AH. Molecular dynamics of transferrin receptor binder peptides: unlocking blood-brain barrier for enhanced CNS drug delivery. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2025:1-10. [PMID: 39743789 DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2024.2446676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2024] [Accepted: 10/27/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
A cystine-dense peptide (CDP) named TfRB1 was identified for its ability to bind to the transferrin receptor (TfR). CDPs are stabilized by their disulfide bonds, and variants of TfRB1 - specifically TfRB1G1, TfRB1G2, and TfRB1G3 - are explored for their potential to transport molecules across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) into the central nervous system (CNS). This study employed molecular modeling and dynamics simulations to characterize the interactions between these TfRB1 variants and TfR. Binding free energy calculations showed a strong correlation with experimental binding affinities of -10.99 kcal/mol for TfRB1G2 and -13.18 kcal/mol for TfRB1G3, with a relative error of 1.98%. The key forces driving these interactions include electrostatic and van der Waals forces, with mutations in TfRB1G3 (T9M and A13D) enhancing its binding affinity through improved interactions with residues such as Arg633. The free energy landscape analysis revealed that TfRB1G3 maintains the N-terminal residues of TfR in an α-helical conformation, unlike TfRB1G2. Per-residue free energy decomposition identified key residues - Leu619, Arg629, Tyr643, and Phe650 - as crucial for TfR binding, underscoring their competitive nature with transferrin. Additionally, Glu612, which is favorable for binding in TfRB1G2, becomes unfavorable in TfRB1G3. Conversely, Arg633 shifts from unfavorable in TfRB1G2 to favorable in TfRB1G3, compensating for the loss of favorable interaction with Glu612. These findings provide valuable molecular insights into the TfRB1 peptides' potential as drug carriers, highlighting their capability to deliver molecules to the CNS and compete with transferrin for BBB transport.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luiz Patrick Cordeiro Josino
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Química Medicinal e Modelagem Molecular, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Brazil
- Laboratório de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento de Fármacos, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Brazil
| | - Renan Patrick da Penha Valente
- Laboratório de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento de Fármacos, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Química, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Naturais, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Brazil
| | - Maria Luane de Souza da Silva
- Laboratório de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento de Fármacos, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Química, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Naturais, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Brazil
| | - Cláudio Nahum Alves
- Laboratório de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento de Fármacos, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Brazil
- Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Naturais, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Brazil
| | - Anderson H Lima
- Laboratório de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento de Fármacos, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Brazil
- Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Naturais, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belem, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Karnik SJ, Margetts TJ, Wang HS, Movila A, Oblak AL, Fehrenbacher JC, Kacena MA, Plotkin LI. Mind the Gap: Unraveling the Intricate Dance Between Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias and Bone Health. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2024; 22:165-176. [PMID: 38285083 PMCID: PMC10912190 DOI: 10.1007/s11914-023-00847-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review examines the linked pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease/related dementia (AD/ADRD) and bone disorders like osteoporosis. The emphasis is on "inflammaging"-a low-level inflammation common to both, and its implications in an aging population. RECENT FINDINGS Aging intensifies both ADRD and bone deterioration. Notably, ADRD patients have a heightened fracture risk, impacting morbidity and mortality, though it is uncertain if fractures worsen ADRD. Therapeutically, agents targeting inflammation pathways, especially Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB) and TNF-α, appear beneficial for both conditions. Additionally, treatments like Sirtuin 1 (SIRT-1), known for anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties, are gaining attention. The interconnectedness of AD/ADRD and bone health necessitates a unified treatment approach. By addressing shared mechanisms, we can potentially transform therapeutic strategies, enriching our understanding and refining care in our aging society. This review article is part of a series of multiple manuscripts designed to determine the utility of using artificial intelligence for writing scientific reviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonali J Karnik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Tyler J Margetts
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Hannah S Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Alexandru Movila
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Comprehensive Care, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
- Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Adrian L Oblak
- Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Jill C Fehrenbacher
- Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Melissa A Kacena
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
- Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
- Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| | - Lilian I Plotkin
- Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
- Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chakraborty P, Bhattacharyya C, Sahu R, Dua TK, Kandimalla R, Dewanjee S. Polymeric nanotherapeutics: An emerging therapeutic approach for the management of neurodegenerative disorders. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2024; 91:105267. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2023.105267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2025]
|
7
|
Pardridge WM. Treatment of Parkinson's disease with biologics that penetrate the blood-brain barrier via receptor-mediated transport. Front Aging Neurosci 2023; 15:1276376. [PMID: 38035276 PMCID: PMC10682952 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1276376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by neurodegeneration of nigral-striatal neurons in parallel with the formation of intra-neuronal α-synuclein aggregates, and these processes are exacerbated by neuro-inflammation. All 3 components of PD pathology are potentially treatable with biologics. Neurotrophins, such as glial derived neurotrophic factor or erythropoietin, can promote neural repair. Therapeutic antibodies can lead to disaggregation of α-synuclein neuronal inclusions. Decoy receptors can block the activity of pro-inflammatory cytokines in brain. However, these biologic drugs do not cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Biologics can be made transportable through the BBB following the re-engineering of the biologic as an IgG fusion protein, where the IgG domain targets an endogenous receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT) system within the BBB, such as the insulin receptor or transferrin receptor. The receptor-specific antibody domain of the fusion protein acts as a molecular Trojan horse to ferry the biologic into brain via the BBB RMT pathway. This review describes the re-engineering of all 3 classes of biologics (neurotrophins, decoy receptor, therapeutic antibodies) for BBB delivery and treatment of PD. Targeting the RMT pathway at the BBB also enables non-viral gene therapy of PD using lipid nanoparticles (LNP) encapsulated with plasmid DNA encoding therapeutic genes. The surface of the lipid nanoparticle is conjugated with a receptor-specific IgG that triggers RMT of the LNP across the BBB in vivo.
Collapse
|
8
|
Deng K, Lu Y, Finnema SJ, Vangjeli K, Huang J, Huang L, Goodearl A. Application of In vitro transcytosis models to brain targeted biologics. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289970. [PMID: 37611031 PMCID: PMC10446226 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The blood brain barrier (BBB) efficiently limits the penetration of biologics drugs from blood to brain. Establishment of an in vitro BBB model can facilitate screening of central nervous system (CNS) drug candidates and accelerate CNS drug development. Despite many established in vitro models, their application to biologics drug selection has been limited. Here, we report the evaluation of in vitro transcytosis of anti-human transferrin receptor (TfR) antibodies across human, cynomolgus and mouse species. We first evaluated human models including human cerebral microvascular endothelial cell line hCMEC/D3 and human colon epithelial cell line Caco-2 models. hCMEC/D3 model displayed low trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER), strong paracellular transport, and similar transcytosis of anti-TfR and control antibodies. In contrast, the Caco-2 model displayed high TEER value and low paracellular transport. Anti-hTfR antibodies demonstrated up to 70-fold better transcytosis compared to control IgG. Transcytosis of anti-hTfR.B1 antibody in Caco-2 model was dose-dependent and saturated at 3 μg/mL. Enhanced transcytosis of anti-hTfR.B1 was also observed in a monkey brain endothelial cell based (MBT) model. Importantly, anti-hTfR.B1 showed relatively high brain radioactivity concentration in a non-human primate positron emission tomography study indicating that the in vitro transcytosis from both Caco-2 and MBT models aligns with in vivo brain exposure. Typically, brain exposure of CNS targeted biologics is evaluated in mice. However, antibodies, such as the anti-human TfR antibodies, do not cross-react with the mouse target. Therefore, validation of a mouse in vitro transcytosis model is needed to better understand the in vitro in vivo correlation. Here, we performed transcytosis of anti-mouse TfR antibodies in mouse brain endothelial cell-based models, bEnd3 and the murine intestinal epithelial cell line mIEC. There is a good correlation between in vitro transcytosis of anti-mTfR antibodies and bispecifics in mIEC model and their mouse brain uptake. These data strengthen our confidence in the predictive power of the in vitro transcytosis models. Both mouse and human in vitro models will serve as important screening assays for brain targeted biologics selection in CNS drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kangwen Deng
- AbbVie Bioresearch Center, Worcester, MA, United States of America
| | - Yifeng Lu
- AbbVie Bioresearch Center, Worcester, MA, United States of America
| | | | - Kostika Vangjeli
- AbbVie Bioresearch Center, Worcester, MA, United States of America
| | - Junwei Huang
- AbbVie Bioresearch Center, Worcester, MA, United States of America
| | - Lili Huang
- AbbVie Bioresearch Center, Worcester, MA, United States of America
| | - Andrew Goodearl
- AbbVie Bioresearch Center, Worcester, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pardridge WM. Receptor-mediated drug delivery of bispecific therapeutic antibodies through the blood-brain barrier. FRONTIERS IN DRUG DELIVERY 2023; 3:1227816. [PMID: 37583474 PMCID: PMC10426772 DOI: 10.3389/fddev.2023.1227816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
Therapeutic antibody drug development is a rapidly growing sector of the pharmaceutical industry. However, antibody drug development for the brain is a technical challenge, and therapeutic antibodies for the central nervous system account for ~3% of all such agents. The principal obstacle to antibody drug development for brain or spinal cord is the lack of transport of large molecule biologics across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Therapeutic antibodies can be made transportable through the blood-brain barrier by the re-engineering of the therapeutic antibody as a BBB-penetrating bispecific antibody (BSA). One arm of the BSA is the therapeutic antibody and the other arm of the BSA is a transporting antibody. The transporting antibody targets an exofacial epitope on a BBB receptor, and this enables receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT) of the BSA across the BBB. Following BBB transport, the therapeutic antibody then engages the target receptor in brain. RMT systems at the BBB that are potential conduits to the brain include the insulin receptor (IR), the transferrin receptor (TfR), the insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR) and the leptin receptor. Therapeutic antibodies have been re-engineered as BSAs that target the insulin receptor, TfR, or IGFR RMT systems at the BBB for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.
Collapse
|
10
|
Hieber C, Grabbe S, Bros M. Counteracting Immunosenescence-Which Therapeutic Strategies Are Promising? Biomolecules 2023; 13:1085. [PMID: 37509121 PMCID: PMC10377144 DOI: 10.3390/biom13071085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Aging attenuates the overall responsiveness of the immune system to eradicate pathogens. The increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by innate immune cells under basal conditions, termed inflammaging, contributes to impaired innate immune responsiveness towards pathogen-mediated stimulation and limits antigen-presenting activity. Adaptive immune responses are attenuated as well due to lowered numbers of naïve lymphocytes and their impaired responsiveness towards antigen-specific stimulation. Additionally, the numbers of immunoregulatory cell types, comprising regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, that inhibit the activity of innate and adaptive immune cells are elevated. This review aims to summarize our knowledge on the cellular and molecular causes of immunosenescence while also taking into account senescence effects that constitute immune evasion mechanisms in the case of chronic viral infections and cancer. For tumor therapy numerous nanoformulated drugs have been developed to overcome poor solubility of compounds and to enable cell-directed delivery in order to restore immune functions, e.g., by addressing dysregulated signaling pathways. Further, nanovaccines which efficiently address antigen-presenting cells to mount sustained anti-tumor immune responses have been clinically evaluated. Further, senolytics that selectively deplete senescent cells are being tested in a number of clinical trials. Here we discuss the potential use of such drugs to improve anti-aging therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Hieber
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Ackermannweg 4, 55128 Mainz, Germany
| | - Stephan Grabbe
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Ackermannweg 4, 55128 Mainz, Germany
| | - Matthias Bros
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pakula RJ, Scott PJH. Applications of radiolabeled antibodies in neuroscience and neuro-oncology. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm 2023; 66:269-285. [PMID: 37322805 DOI: 10.1002/jlcr.4049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) is a powerful tool in medicine and drug development, allowing for non-invasive imaging and quantitation of biological processes in live organisms. Targets are often probed with small molecules, but antibody-based PET is expanding because of many benefits, including ease of design of new antibodies toward targets, as well as the very strong affinities that can be expected. Application of antibodies to PET imaging of targets in the central nervous system (CNS) is a particularly nascent field, but one with tremendous potential. In this review, we discuss the growth of PET in imaging of CNS targets, present the promises and progress in antibody-based CNS PET, explore challenges faced by the field, and discuss questions that this promising approach will need to answer moving forward for imaging and perhaps even radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J Pakula
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Peter J H Scott
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Baghirov H. Receptor-mediated transcytosis of macromolecules across the blood-brain barrier. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2023; 20:1699-1711. [PMID: 37658673 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2023.2255138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The blood-brain barrier (BBB) restricts brain access of virtually all macromolecules. Receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT) is one strategy toward their brain delivery. In this strategy, targeting ligands conjugated to therapeutic payload or decorating particles containing the payload interact with targets on brain capillary endothelial cells (BCEC), triggering internalization, trafficking, and release from BCEC. AREAS COVERED RMT at the BBB has leveraged multiple formats of macromolecules and large particles. Interactions between those and BCEC have been studied primarily using antibodies, with findings applicable to the design of larger particles. BBB-penetrant constructs have also been identified in screening campaigns and directed evolution, and subsequently found to interact with RMT targets. In addition, BCEC targeted by constructs incorporating genomic payload can be made to produce therapeutic proteins. EXPERT OPINION While targeting may not be strictly necessary to reach a therapeutic effect for all macromolecules, it can improve a molecule's BBB transport, exposing it to the entire brain parenchyma and enhancing its effect. Constructs with better BCEC transcytosis may be designed rationally, leveraging knowledge about BCEC trafficking, and found in screening campaigns, where this knowledge can reduce the search space and improve iterative refinement. Identification of new targets may also help generate BBB-crossing constructs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Habib Baghirov
- Roche Informatics, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Poznań, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sokolov AV, Isakova-Sivak IN, Mezhenskaya DA, Kostevich VA, Gorbunov NP, Elizarova AY, Matyushenko VA, Berson YM, Grudinina NA, Kolmakov NN, Zabrodskaya YA, Komlev AS, Semak IV, Budevich AI, Rudenko LG, Vasilyev VB. Molecular mimicry of the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: from the interaction of spike-specific antibodies with transferrin and lactoferrin to the antiviral effects of human recombinant lactoferrin. Biometals 2023; 36:437-462. [PMID: 36334191 PMCID: PMC9638208 DOI: 10.1007/s10534-022-00458-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection involves dysregulations of iron metabolism, and although the mechanism of this pathology is not yet fully understood, correction of iron metabolism pathways seems a promising pharmacological target. The previously observed effect of inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection by ferristatin II, an inducer of transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) degradation, prompted the study of competition between Spike protein and TfR1 ligands, especially lactoferrin (Lf) and transferrin (Tf). We hypothesized molecular mimicry of Spike protein as cross-reactivity of Spike-specific antibodies with Tf and Lf. Thus, strong positive correlations (R2 > 0.95) were found between the level of Spike-specific IgG antibodies present in serum samples of COVID-19-recovered and Sputnik V-vaccinated individuals and their Tf-binding activity assayed with peroxidase-labeled anti-Tf. In addition, we observed cross-reactivity of Lf-specific murine monoclonal antibody (mAb) towards the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein. On the other hand, the interaction of mAbs produced to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the Spike protein with recombinant RBD protein was disrupted by Tf, Lf, soluble TfR1, anti-TfR1 aptamer, as well as by peptides RGD and GHAIYPRH. Furthermore, direct interaction of RBD protein with Lf, but not Tf, was observed, with affinity of binding estimated by KD to be 23 nM and 16 nM for apo-Lf and holo-Lf, respectively. Treatment of Vero E6 cells with apo-Lf and holo-Lf (1-4 mg/mL) significantly inhibited SARS-CoV-2 replication of both Wuhan and Delta lineages. Protective effects of Lf on different arms of SARS-CoV-2-induced pathogenesis and possible consequences of cross-reactivity of Spike-specific antibodies are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A V Sokolov
- Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academica Pavlova Str. 12, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia.
| | - I N Isakova-Sivak
- Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academica Pavlova Str. 12, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia
| | - D A Mezhenskaya
- Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academica Pavlova Str. 12, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia
| | - V A Kostevich
- Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academica Pavlova Str. 12, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia
| | - N P Gorbunov
- Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academica Pavlova Str. 12, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia
| | - A Yu Elizarova
- Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academica Pavlova Str. 12, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia
| | - V A Matyushenko
- Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academica Pavlova Str. 12, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia
| | - Yu M Berson
- Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academica Pavlova Str. 12, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia
| | - N A Grudinina
- Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academica Pavlova Str. 12, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia
| | - N N Kolmakov
- Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academica Pavlova Str. 12, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia
| | - Y A Zabrodskaya
- Smorodintsev Research Institute of Influenza, Russian Ministry of Health, Prof. Popova Str. 15/17, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia
- Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Ulitsa Polytechnicheskaya, 194064, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - A S Komlev
- Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academica Pavlova Str. 12, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia
| | - I V Semak
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology, Belarusian State University, Nezavisimisty Ave. 4, 220030, Minsk, Belarus
| | - A I Budevich
- Scientific and Practical Center of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus for Animal Breeding, 11 Frunze Str., 222160, Zhodino, Belarus
| | - L G Rudenko
- Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academica Pavlova Str. 12, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia
| | - V B Vasilyev
- Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academica Pavlova Str. 12, St. Petersburg, 197376, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mardi N, Salahpour-Anarjan F, Nemati M, Shahsavari Baher N, Rahbarghazi R, Zarebkohan A. Exosomes; multifaceted nanoplatform for targeting brain cancers. Cancer Lett 2023; 557:216077. [PMID: 36731592 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
At the moment, anaplastic changes within the brain are challenging due to the complexity of neural tissue, leading to the inefficiency of therapeutic protocols. The existence of a cellular interface, namely the blood-brain barrier (BBB), restricts the entry of several macromolecules and therapeutic agents into the brain. To date, several nano-based platforms have been used in laboratory settings and in vivo conditions to overcome the barrier properties of BBB. Exosomes (Exos) are one-of-a-kind of extracellular vesicles with specific cargo to modulate cell bioactivities in a paracrine manner. Regarding unique physicochemical properties and easy access to various biofluids, Exos provide a favorable platform for drug delivery and therapeutic purposes. Emerging data have indicated that Exos enable brain penetration of selective cargos such as bioactive factors and chemotherapeutic compounds. Along with these statements, the application of smart delivery approaches can increase delivery efficiency and thus therapeutic outcomes. Here, we highlighted the recent advances in the application of Exos in the context of brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narges Mardi
- Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran; Department of Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Salahpour-Anarjan
- Department of Medical Nanotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mahdieh Nemati
- Department of Medical Nanotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Nasim Shahsavari Baher
- Department of Medical Nanotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Reza Rahbarghazi
- Department of Applied Cell Sciences, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Amir Zarebkohan
- Department of Medical Nanotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lopresti BJ, Royse SK, Mathis CA, Tollefson SA, Narendran R. Beyond monoamines: I. Novel targets and radiotracers for Positron emission tomography imaging in psychiatric disorders. J Neurochem 2023; 164:364-400. [PMID: 35536762 DOI: 10.1111/jnc.15615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
With the emergence of positron emission tomography (PET) in the late 1970s, psychiatry had access to a tool capable of non-invasive assessment of human brain function. Early applications in psychiatry focused on identifying characteristic brain blood flow and metabolic derangements using radiotracers such as [15 O]H2 O and [18 F]FDG. Despite the success of these techniques, it became apparent that more specific probes were needed to understand the neurochemical bases of psychiatric disorders. The first neurochemical PET imaging probes targeted sites of action of neuroleptic (dopamine D2 receptors) and psychoactive (serotonin receptors) drugs. Based on the centrality of monoamine dysfunction in psychiatric disorders and the measured success of monoamine-enhancing drugs in treating them, the next 30 years witnessed the development of an armamentarium of PET radiopharmaceuticals and imaging methodologies for studying monoamines. Continued development of monoamine-enhancing drugs over this time however was less successful, realizing only modest gains in efficacy and tolerability. As patent protection for many widely prescribed and profitable psychiatric drugs lapsed, drug development pipelines shifted away from monoamines in search of novel targets with the promises of improved efficacy, or abandoned altogether. Over this period, PET radiopharmaceutical development activities closely paralleled drug development priorities resulting in the development of new PET imaging agents for non-monoamine targets. Part one of this review will briefly survey novel PET imaging targets with relevance to the field of psychiatry, which include the metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 (mGluR5), purinergic P2 X7 receptor, type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1 ), phosphodiesterase 10A (PDE10A), and describe radiotracers developed for these and other targets that have matured to human subject investigations. Current limitations of the targets and techniques will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J Lopresti
- Departments of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sarah K Royse
- Departments of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chester A Mathis
- Departments of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Savannah A Tollefson
- Departments of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rajesh Narendran
- Departments of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Departments of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pauwels MJ, Xie J, Ceroi A, Balusu S, Castelein J, Van Wonterghem E, Van Imschoot G, Ward A, Menheniott TR, Gustafsson O, Combes F, El Andaloussi S, Sanders NN, Mäger I, Van Hoecke L, Vandenbroucke RE. Choroid plexus-derived extracellular vesicles exhibit brain targeting characteristics. Biomaterials 2022; 290:121830. [PMID: 36302306 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The brain is protected against invading organisms and other unwanted substances by tightly regulated barriers. However, these central nervous system (CNS) barriers impede the delivery of drugs into the brain via the blood circulation and are therefore considered major hurdles in the treatment of neurological disorders. Consequently, there is a high need for efficient delivery systems that are able to cross these strict barriers. While most research focuses on the blood-brain barrier (BBB), the design of drug delivery platforms that are able to cross the blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier, formed by a single layer of choroid plexus epithelial cells, remains a largely unexplored domain. The discovery that extracellular vesicles (EVs) make up a natural mechanism for information transfer between cells and across cell layers, has stimulated interest in their potential use as drug delivery platform. Here, we report that choroid plexus epithelial cell-derived EVs exhibit the capacity to home to the brain after peripheral administration. Moreover, these vesicles are able to functionally deliver cargo into the brain. Our findings underline the therapeutic potential of choroid plexus-derived EVs as a brain drug delivery vehicle via targeting of the blood-CSF interface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie J Pauwels
- VIB Center for Inflammation Research, VIB, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Junhua Xie
- VIB Center for Inflammation Research, VIB, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Adam Ceroi
- VIB Center for Inflammation Research, VIB, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sriram Balusu
- VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, VIB, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonas Castelein
- VIB Center for Inflammation Research, VIB, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Elien Van Wonterghem
- VIB Center for Inflammation Research, VIB, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Griet Van Imschoot
- VIB Center for Inflammation Research, VIB, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Andrew Ward
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
| | - Trevelyan R Menheniott
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Flemington Rd. Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Flemington Rd. Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Oskar Gustafsson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Francis Combes
- Department of Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, SINTEF AS, Sem Sælands V. 2A, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Samir El Andaloussi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Niek N Sanders
- Laboratory of Gene Therapy, Department of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Heidestraat 19, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Imre Mäger
- Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, 50 411, Tartu, Estonia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Lien Van Hoecke
- VIB Center for Inflammation Research, VIB, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Roosmarijn E Vandenbroucke
- VIB Center for Inflammation Research, VIB, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 71, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sánchez-Navarro M, Giralt E. Peptide Shuttles for Blood–Brain Barrier Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14091874. [PMID: 36145622 PMCID: PMC9505527 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14091874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The blood–brain barrier (BBB) limits the delivery of therapeutics to the brain but also represents the main gate for nutrient entrance. Targeting the natural transport mechanisms of the BBB offers an attractive route for brain drug delivery. Peptide shuttles are able to use these mechanisms to increase the transport of compounds that cannot cross the BBB unaided. As peptides are a group of biomolecules with unique physicochemical and structural properties, the field of peptide shuttles has substantially evolved in the last few years. In this review, we analyze the main classifications of BBB–peptide shuttles and the leading sources used to discover them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Macarena Sánchez-Navarro
- Department of Molecular Biology, Instituto de Parasitología y Biomedicina ‘‘López Neyra” (CSIC), 18016 Granada, Spain
- Correspondence: (M.S.-N.); (E.G.)
| | - Ernest Giralt
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Baldiri Reixac 10, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Inorganic and Organic Chemistry, University of Barcelona, Martí i Franquès 1-11, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Correspondence: (M.S.-N.); (E.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Boado RJ. IgG Fusion Proteins for Brain Delivery of Biologics via Blood-Brain Barrier Receptor-Mediated Transport. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14071476. [PMID: 35890374 PMCID: PMC9322584 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14071476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment of neurological disorders with large-molecule biotherapeutics requires that the therapeutic drug be transported across the blood–brain barrier (BBB). However, recombinant biotherapeutics, such as neurotrophins, enzymes, decoy receptors, and monoclonal antibodies (MAb), do not cross the BBB. These biotherapeutics can be re-engineered as brain-penetrating bifunctional IgG fusion proteins. These recombinant proteins comprise two domains, the transport domain and the therapeutic domain, respectively. The transport domain is an MAb that acts as a molecular Trojan horse by targeting a BBB-specific endogenous receptor that induces receptor-mediated transcytosis into the brain, such as the human insulin receptor (HIR) or the transferrin receptor (TfR). The therapeutic domain of the IgG fusion protein exerts its pharmacological effect in the brain once across the BBB. A generation of bifunctional IgG fusion proteins has been engineered using genetically engineered MAbs directed to either the BBB HIR or TfR as the transport domain. These IgG fusion proteins were validated in animal models of lysosomal storage disorders; acute brain conditions, such as stroke; or chronic neurodegeneration, such as Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. Human phase I–III clinical trials were also completed for Hurler MPSI and Hunter MPSII using brain-penetrating IgG-iduronidase and -iduronate-2-sulfatase fusion protein, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben J Boado
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pardridge WM. A Historical Review of Brain Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:1283. [PMID: 35745855 PMCID: PMC9229021 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The history of brain drug delivery is reviewed beginning with the first demonstration, in 1914, that a drug for syphilis, salvarsan, did not enter the brain, due to the presence of a blood-brain barrier (BBB). Owing to restricted transport across the BBB, FDA-approved drugs for the CNS have been generally limited to lipid-soluble small molecules. Drugs that do not cross the BBB can be re-engineered for transport on endogenous BBB carrier-mediated transport and receptor-mediated transport systems, which were identified during the 1970s-1980s. By the 1990s, a multitude of brain drug delivery technologies emerged, including trans-cranial delivery, CSF delivery, BBB disruption, lipid carriers, prodrugs, stem cells, exosomes, nanoparticles, gene therapy, and biologics. The advantages and limitations of each of these brain drug delivery technologies are critically reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William M Pardridge
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vargas JG, Wagner J, Shaikh H, Lang I, Medler J, Anany M, Steinfatt T, Mosca JP, Haack S, Dahlhoff J, Büttner-Herold M, Graf C, Viera EA, Einsele H, Wajant H, Beilhack A. A TNFR2-Specific TNF Fusion Protein With Improved In Vivo Activity. Front Immunol 2022; 13:888274. [PMID: 35769484 PMCID: PMC9234581 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.888274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-2 (TNFR2) has attracted considerable interest as a target for immunotherapy. Indeed, using oligomeric fusion proteins of single chain-encoded TNFR2-specific TNF mutants (scTNF80), expansion of regulatory T cells and therapeutic activity could be demonstrated in various autoinflammatory diseases, including graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). With the aim to improve the in vivo availability of TNFR2-specific TNF fusion proteins, we used here the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-interacting IgG1 molecule as an oligomerizing building block and generated a new TNFR2 agonist with improved serum retention and superior in vivo activity. Methods Single-chain encoded murine TNF80 trimers (sc(mu)TNF80) were fused to the C-terminus of an in mice irrelevant IgG1 molecule carrying the N297A mutation which avoids/minimizes interaction with Fcγ-receptors (FcγRs). The fusion protein obtained (irrIgG1(N297A)-sc(mu)TNF80), termed NewSTAR2 (New selective TNF-based agonist of TNF receptor 2), was analyzed with respect to activity, productivity, serum retention and in vitro and in vivo activity. STAR2 (TNC-sc(mu)TNF80 or selective TNF-based agonist of TNF receptor 2), a well-established highly active nonameric TNFR2-specific variant, served as benchmark. NewSTAR2 was assessed in various in vitro and in vivo systems. Results STAR2 (TNC-sc(mu)TNF80) and NewSTAR2 (irrIgG1(N297A)-sc(mu)TNF80) revealed comparable in vitro activity. The novel domain architecture of NewSTAR2 significantly improved serum retention compared to STAR2, which correlated with efficient binding to FcRn. A single injection of NewSTAR2 enhanced regulatory T cell (Treg) suppressive activity and increased Treg numbers by > 300% in vivo 5 days after treatment. Treg numbers remained as high as 200% for about 10 days. Furthermore, a single in vivo treatment with NewSTAR2 upregulated the adenosine-regulating ectoenzyme CD39 and other activation markers on Tregs. TNFR2-stimulated Tregs proved to be more suppressive than unstimulated Tregs, reducing conventional T cell (Tcon) proliferation and expression of activation markers in vitro. Finally, singular preemptive NewSTAR2 administration five days before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) protected mice from acute GvHD. Conclusions NewSTAR2 represents a next generation ligand-based TNFR2 agonist, which is efficiently produced, exhibits improved pharmacokinetic properties and high serum retention with superior in vivo activity exerting powerful protective effects against acute GvHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Gamboa Vargas
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Graduate School of Life Sciences, Würzburg University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jennifer Wagner
- Division of Molecular Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Haroon Shaikh
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Graduate School of Life Sciences, Würzburg University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Isabell Lang
- Division of Molecular Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Juliane Medler
- Division of Molecular Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Mohamed Anany
- Division of Molecular Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Department of Microbial Biotechnology, Institute of Biotechnology, Giza, Egypt
| | - Tim Steinfatt
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Josefina Peña Mosca
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Graduate School of Life Sciences, Würzburg University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Stephanie Haack
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Julia Dahlhoff
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maike Büttner-Herold
- Department of Nephropathology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carolin Graf
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Estibaliz Arellano Viera
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Hermann Einsele
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Harald Wajant
- Division of Molecular Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Beilhack
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research Laboratory, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Graduate School of Life Sciences, Würzburg University, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pardridge WM. Blood-brain barrier delivery for lysosomal storage disorders with IgG-lysosomal enzyme fusion proteins. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022; 184:114234. [PMID: 35307484 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The majority of lysosomal storage diseases affect the brain. Treatment of the brain with intravenous enzyme replacement therapy is not successful, because the recombinant lysosomal enzymes do not cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Biologic drugs, including lysosomal enzymes, can be re-engineered for BBB delivery as IgG-enzyme fusion proteins. The IgG domain of the fusion protein is a monoclonal antibody directed against an endogenous receptor-mediated transporter at the BBB, such as the insulin receptor or the transferrin receptor. This receptor transports the IgG across the BBB, in parallel with the endogenous receptor ligand, and the IgG acts as a molecular Trojan horse to ferry into brain the lysosomal enzyme genetically fused to the IgG. The IgG-enzyme fusion protein is bi-functional and retains both high affinity binding for the BBB receptor, and high lysosomal enzyme activity. IgG-lysosomal enzymes are presently in clinical trials for treatment of the brain in Mucopolysaccharidosis.
Collapse
|