Evaluation of Aerosol Drug Delivery Options during Adult Mechanical Ventilation in the COVID-19 Era

In Vitro Comparison of Inspiration-Synchronized and Continuous Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer During Adult Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Background: Aerosol delivery may be enhanced by utilizing an inspiration-synchronized nebulization mode, where nebulization occurs only during inspiration. This study aimed to compare aerosol delivery of albuterol via a prototype of an inspiration-synchronized vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) versus continuous VMN during invasive mechanical ventilation. Methods: A critical care ventilator equipped with a heated-wire circuit to deliver adult parameters was attached to an endotracheal tube (ETT), a collection filter, and a test lung. The nebulizer was placed at the humidifier's inlet, inspiratory limb at the Y-piece, and between the Y-piece and ETT. Conventional VMNs producing standard size aerosol particles (Solo; Aerogen Ltd) were compared with prototype small-particle VMNs (Aerogen Pharma) in both inspiration-synchronization and continuous modes. In each run, 1 mL of albuterol (2.5 mg) was used (n = 5). The drug was eluted from the collection filter and assayed with UV spectrophotometry (276 nm). Results: The inhaled dose with inspiration-synchronization mode was 1.4 to 3.6 times that with the continuous mode, regardless of nebulizer positions (all p < 0.001). The small-particle VMN delivered an 8%-69% greater inhaled dose than the conventional VMN (Solo), regardless of the nebulizer placement or aerosol generation mode (all p < 0.001). The highest inhaled dose (50%-60%) with the inspiration-synchronized VMN was observed when it was placed at the ETT (all p < 0.001), whereas the continuous VMN performed better when positioned near the humidifier, with an inhaled dose of 21%-37% (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The inspiration-synchronized VMN delivered a greater inhaled dose than continuous VMN, irrespective of nebulizer placement. The prototype VMN producing smaller aerosol particles resulted in a greater inhaled dose than the conventional VMN (Solo), regardless of placement or aerosol generation modes. The inspiration-synchronized VMN achieved the highest delivery when placed close to the airway, whereas the continuous VMN delivered the most when positioned near the ventilator.

Delivery Efficiency of Albuterol Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler Through Small Size Laryngeal Mask Airways in an Infant and Child Model

Background: Intraoperative bronchospasm in pediatric patients supported through laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) is commonly treated with pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) albuterol. The aim of the study was to evaluate delivery of pMDI albuterol through LMAs under different conditions in a model of infant/child supported with a ventilator. Methods: We compared drug delivery efficiency of 4 actuations of albuterol pMDI (captured on a filter placed between the LMA and a test lung), drug deposition in the circuit (elbow) and in the LMA under different experimental conditions. Outcomes were expressed of percentage of nominal dose. We compared devices (valved holding chamber [VHC] and adapter), timing of administration (inspiration and expiration), tidal volumes (50 mL and 100 mL), mode of actuation (single and multiple), and LMA sizes (1, 1.5, and 2). Multiple regression analysis was used to evaluate the contribution of each to these components to the outcomes. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Results are expressed as median (interquartile range) of pooled data. Drug delivery efficiency was 0% (0-1.1) and 6.3% (3.2-14.7) for adapter and VHC, respectively. Elbow deposition was 25.8% (19.2-63.3) and 2.9% (1.4-6.4) for adapter and VHC, respectively. LMA deposition was 2.6% (1.3-4.6) and 4.6% (2.9-6.1) for adapter and VHC, respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that device, timing of actuation, and LMA size explained 33%, 17%, and 8% of the observed variation in delivery efficiency (R2 0.63), respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that device and timing of actuation explained 52% and 16% of the observed variation, respectively (R2 0.70). Multiple regression analysis poorly explained factors associated with LMA deposition (R2 0.22). Conclusions: Using a VHC, actuating the pMDI during exhalation, and using a small LMA size increased drug delivery efficiency. The adapter was an inefficient add-on device for aerosol delivery with a pMDI through an LMA that caused significant circuit deposition.

Efficacy of a prototype inspiratory-synchronized small particle versus conventional vibrating mesh nebulizer during pediatric and neonatal mechanical ventilation

BACKGROUND

An inspiration-synchronized vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) has been reported to improve aerosol delivery during adult mechanical ventilation. A prototype VMN generating smaller particles was developed. We aimed to compare the aerosol delivery efficiency of small-particle and conventional VMNs in inspiration-synchronized and continuous modes during neonatal and pediatric mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

A critical care ventilator with heated humidified circuits connected to an endotracheal tube (ETT) and passive test lung was set to pediatric and neonate parameters. Albuterol (2.5 mg/ml, 1 ml) was administered using both small-particle and conventional VMNs in inspiration-synchronization and continuous modes. For the pediatric model, VMN was placed at the humidifier inlet, inspiratory limb at Y-piece, and between Y-piece and ETT (Y-ETT). For the neonatal model, VMN was placed at the humidifier inlet and between Y-ETT. Each setup was repeated five times. Albuterol collected on the filter distal to the ETT was eluted and assayed with UV spectrophotometry (276 nm).

RESULTS

The inspiration-synchronized VMN generated higher inhaled doses compared to continuous VMN across all nebulizer placements, particle sizes, and aerosol generation models (all p < .05). The highest inhaled doses (42.2 ± 2.0% and 40.7 ± 1.0% for pediatric and neonate, respectively) were observed with the small-particle inspiration-synchronized VMN placed at Y-ETT. In the pediatric model, the inhaled dose with inspiration-synchronized conventional VMN was similar, independent of nebulizer placements (24.4 ~ 27.0%). In contrast, the inhaled dose was greatest with continuous VMN placed at the humidifier inlet. With the neonatal model, VMN placed at Y-ETT yielded higher doses than the humidifier inlet, and small-particle VMNs outperformed conventional VMNs across all settings (all p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The prototype small-particle VMN positioned between Y-piece and ETT in an inspiration-synchronized mode optimized aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation in both pediatric and neonatal models.

Pulmonary drug delivery devices and nanosystems as potential treatment strategies for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)

Despite advances in drug delivery technologies, treating acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is challenging due to pathophysiological barriers such as lung injury, oedema fluid build-up, and lung inflammation. Active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) can be delivered directly to the lung site of action with the use of aerosol-based drug delivery devices, and this circumvents the hepatic first-pass effect and improves the bioavailability of drugs. This review discusses the various challenges and barriers for pulmonary drug delivery, current interventions for delivery, considerations for effective drug delivery, and the use of nanoparticle drug delivery carriers as potential strategies for delivering therapeutics in ARDS. Nanosystems have the added benefit of entrapping drugs, increase pulmonary drug bioavailability, and using biocompatible and biodegradable excipients that can facilitate targeted and/or controlled delivery. These systems provide an alternative to existing conventional systems. An effective way to deliver drugs for the treatment of ARDS can be by using colloidal systems that are aerosolized or inhaled. Drug distribution to the deeper pulmonary tissues is necessary due to the significant endothelial cell destruction that is prevalent in ARDS. The particle size of nanoparticles (<0.5 μm) makes them ideal candidates for treating ARDS as they can reach the alveoli. A look into the various potential benefits and limitations of nanosystems used for other lung disorders is also considered to indicate how they may be useful for the potential treatment of ARDS.

Nebuliser therapy in critical care: The past, present and future

Nebulisers are devices that reduce a body of liquid into a fine aerosol suitable for inhalation. Utilising the efficiency of pulmonary drug absorption, they offer a safe and powerful modality for local and systemic drug delivery in the treatment of critical illness. In comparison to conventional jet (JN) and ultrasonic nebulisers (USN), the advent of vibrating mesh nebulisers (VMN) has significantly improved the therapeutic potential of modern devices. This review article aims to summarise the history and evolution of nebulisers from first inception through to the modern vibrating mesh technology. It provides an overview on the basic science of nebulisation and pulmonary drug delivery, and the current use of nebulised therapies in critical care.

An in vitro study of the effects of respiratory circuit setup and parameters on aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation

Introduction

Aerosol therapy is often prescribed concurrently during invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). This study determines the effects of nebuliser position, circuit humidification source, and most importantly, lung health on the delivery of aerosol in simulated adult and paediatric IMV patients. Furthermore, the influence of closed suction catheters on aerosol delivery is also addressed.

Methods

A vibrating mesh nebuliser was used to deliver Albuterol to simulated adult and paediatric IMV patients with differing states of lung health. Four different nebuliser positions and two types of humidification were analysed. Closed suction catheter mounts, a mainstay in IMV therapy, were incorporated into the circuits. The mean ± SD dose of aerosol (%) was assayed from a filter at the distal end of the endotracheal tube.

Results

Nebuliser placement and circuit humidification source had no effect on the delivered dose (%) in adults, yet both significantly did in the simulated paediatric patients. The use of closed suction catheter mounts significantly reduced the delivered dose (%) in adults but not in paediatric patients. A simulated healthy lung state generated the largest delivered dose (%), irrespective of nebuliser position in the adult. However, different lung health and nebuliser positions yielded higher delivered doses (%) in paediatrics.

Conclusion

Lung health and respiratory circuit composition significantly affect aerosol delivery in both adult and paediatric IMV patients. Nebuliser placement and respiratory circuit humidification source do not affect the delivered dose in adult but do in paediatric IMV patients.

Aerosol Delivery of a Novel Recombinant Modified Superoxide Dismutase Protein Reduces Oxidant Injury and Attenuates Escherichia coli Induced Lung Injury in Rats

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening respiratory failure syndrome with diverse etiologies characterized by increased permeability of alveolar-capillary membranes, pulmonary edema, and acute onset hypoxemia. During the ARDS acute phase, neutrophil infiltration into the alveolar space results in uncontrolled release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and proteases, overwhelming antioxidant defenses and causing alveolar epithelial and lung endothelial injury. Objectives: To investigate the therapeutic potential of a novel recombinant human Cu-Zn-superoxide dismutase (SOD) fusion protein in protecting against ROS injury and for aerosolized SOD delivery to treat Escherichia coli induced ARDS. Methods: Fusion proteins incorporating human Cu-Zn-SOD (hSOD1), with (pep1-hSOD1-his) and without (hSOD1-his) a fused hyaluronic acid-binding peptide, were expressed in E. coli. Purified proteins were evaluated in in vitro assays with human bronchial epithelial cells and through aerosolized delivery to the lung of an E. coli-induced ARDS rat model. Results: SOD proteins exhibited high SOD activity in vitro and protected bronchial epithelial cells from oxidative damage. hSOD1-his and pep1-hSOD1-his retained SOD activity postnebulization and exhibited no adverse effects in the rat. Pep1-hSOD1-his administered through instillation or nebulization to the lung of an E. coli-induced pneumonia rat improved arterial oxygenation and lactate levels compared to vehicle after 48 hours. Static lung compliance was improved when the pep1-hSOD1-his protein was delivered by instillation. White cell infiltration to the lung was significantly reduced by aerosolized delivery of protein, and reduction of cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1, interferon-gamma, and interleukin 6 pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations in bronchoalveolar lavage was observed. Conclusions: Aerosol delivery of a novel recombinant modified SOD protein reduces oxidant injury and attenuates E. coli induced lung injury in rats. The results provide a strong basis for further investigation of the therapeutic potential of hSOD1 in the treatment of ARDS.

Inhaled Exosomes Genetically Manipulated to Overexpress CD24 (EXO-CD24) as a Compassionate Use in Severe ARDS Patients

RATIONALE

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major global health concern with a significant unmet need. EXO-CD24 is delivered via inhalation-reduced cytokines and chemokine secretion and lung injury in ARDS and improved survival in mice models of ARDS, influenza, and sepsis.

OBJECTIVES

This clinical paper aims to evaluate the potential of EXO-CD24, a novel immunomodulatory treatment, in the compassionate care of critically ill, intubated patients with post-infection-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

Eleven critically ill patients diagnosed with post-infection ARDS (10 with COVID-19 and one with an adenovirus-associated infection) were administered EXO-CD24 in four medical centers across Israel. The patients had multiple co-morbidities, including cancer, hypertension, diabetes, and ischemic heart disease, and met the criteria for severe ARDS according to the Berlin classification. EXO-CD24 was administered via inhalation, and adverse events related to its use were carefully monitored.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The administration of EXO-CD24 did not result in any recorded adverse events. The median hospitalization duration was 11.5 days, and the overall mortality rate was 36%. Notably, patients treated at the Tel Aviv Medical Center (TASMC) showed a lower mortality rate of 12.5%. The WBC and CRP levels decreased in comparison to baseline levels at hospitalization, and rapid responses occurred even in patients with kidney transplants who were off the ventilator within a few days and discharged shortly thereafter. The production of cytokines and chemokines was significantly suppressed in all patients, including those who died. Among the patients at TASMC, four had kidney transplants and were on immunosuppressive drugs, and all of them fully recovered and were discharged from the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

EXO-CD24 holds promise as a potential therapeutic agent for all stages of ARDS, even in severe intubated cases. Importantly, EXO-CD24 demonstrated a favorable safety profile without any apparent side effects with promising efficacy. Furthermore, the potential of EXO-CD24 as a platform for addressing hyper-inflammatory states warrants exploration. Further research and larger-scale clinical trials are warranted to validate these preliminary findings.

Aerosol therapy in adult critically ill patients: a consensus statement regarding aerosol administration strategies during various modes of respiratory support

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice of aerosol delivery in conjunction with respiratory support devices for critically ill adult patients remains a topic of controversy due to the complexity of the clinical scenarios and limited clinical evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To reach a consensus for guiding the clinical practice of aerosol delivery in patients receiving respiratory support (invasive and noninvasive) and identifying areas for future research.

METHODS

A modified Delphi method was adopted to achieve a consensus on technical aspects of aerosol delivery for adult critically ill patients receiving various forms of respiratory support, including mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, and high-flow nasal cannula. A thorough search and review of the literature were conducted, and 17 international participants with considerable research involvement and publications on aerosol therapy, comprised a multi-professional panel that evaluated the evidence, reviewed, revised, and voted on recommendations to establish this consensus.

RESULTS

We present a comprehensive document with 20 statements, reviewing the evidence, efficacy, and safety of delivering inhaled agents to adults needing respiratory support, and providing guidance for healthcare workers. Most recommendations were based on in-vitro or experimental studies (low-level evidence), emphasizing the need for randomized clinical trials. The panel reached a consensus after 3 rounds anonymous questionnaires and 2 online meetings.

CONCLUSIONS

We offer a multinational expert consensus that provides guidance on the optimal aerosol delivery techniques for patients receiving respiratory support in various real-world clinical scenarios.

In vitro evaluation of the potential use of snake-derived peptides in the treatment of respiratory infections using inhalation therapy: A proof of concept study

Inhalation therapy using nebulisers is an attractive non-invasive route for drug delivery, particularly for the treatment of lung infections with anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial compounds. This study evaluated the suitability of three snake-derived peptides (termed Sn1b, SnE1 and SnE1-F), which we have recently shown have potent anti-inflammatory and bacteriostatic activities, for nebulisation using a vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN). The effect of nebulisation on peptide concentration, stability and function were assessed, prior to progression to aerodynamic particle size distribution, and in vitro drug delivery in simulated adult spontaneous breathing and mechanical ventilated patient models. When nebulised, all three peptides exhibited similar functions to their non-nebulised counterparts and were found to be respirable during simulated mechanical ventilation. Based on the assessment of the droplet distributions of nebulised peptides using a Next Generation Impactor (NGI) demonstrated that if administered in vivo each peptide would likely be delivered to the lower airways. These data suggest that nebulisation using a VMN is a viable means of anti-microbial / anti-inflammatory peptide delivery targeting microbial respiratory infections, and possibly even systemic infections.

Aerosol delivery in models of pediatric high flow nasal oxygen and mechanical ventilation

BACKGROUND

Aerosol drug delivery during high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are key respiratory care strategies available for the treatment of pediatric patients. We aimed to quantify the impact of different HFNO and IMV set-ups on tracheal drug delivery via a vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN).

METHODS

Percent tracheal dose via VMN was quantified during HFNO therapy and IMV in a benchtop model of a 9-month-old infant. Under HFNO, 3 cannula sizes were used at 3 flow rate settings with the VMN placed at the dry side of the humidifier. Under IMV, tracheal dose when VMN was placed at the dry side of the humidifier, 15 cm from the wye and between the wye and endotracheal tube (ETT) was assessed. Salbutamol at 2.5 mg/2.5 ml (1 mg/ml) was used for each test (N = 5). The impact of VMN refill on circuit pressure under HFNO and IMV was also assessed.

RESULTS

Tracheal dose was highest during HFNO with the largest cannula size (OPT318) set to the lowest flow rate setting of 2 L/min (liter per minute) (5.80 ± 0.17%). Increasing flow rate reduced tracheal drug delivery for all cannulas. For IMV, VMN on the dry side of the humidifier and between the wye and ETT gave optimal drug delivery (4.49 ± 0.14% vs. 4.43 ± 0.26% respectively). VMN refill did not impact circuit pressure for either HFNO therapy or IMV.

CONCLUSIONS

Gas flow rate and cannula size during HFNO and VMN position during IMV has a significant effect on tracheal drug delivery in a pediatric setting.

Not all nebulizers are created equal: Considerations in choosing a nebulizer for aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation

INTRODUCTION

Aerosol therapy is commonly prescribed in the mechanically ventilated patient. Jet nebulizers (JN) and vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMN) are the most common nebulizer types, however, despite VMN's well established superior performance, JN use remains the most commonly used of the two. In this review, we describe the key differentiators between nebulizer types and how considered selection of nebulizer type may enable successful therapy and the optimization of drug/device combination products.

AREAS COVERED

Following a review of the published literature up to February 2023, the current state of the art in relation to JN and VMN is discussed under the headings of in vitro performance of nebulizers during mechanical ventilation, respective compatibility with formulations for inhalation, clinical trials making use of VMN during mechanical ventilation, distribution of nebulized aerosol throughout the lung, measuring the respective performance of nebulizers in the patient and non-drug delivery considerations in nebulizer choice.

EXPERT OPINION

Whether for standard care, or the development of drug/device combination products, the choice of nebulizer type should not be made without consideration of the unique needs of the combination of each of drug, disease and patient types, as well as target site for deposition, and healthcare professional and patient safety.

Molecular Insight into the Therapeutic Effects of Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes in Respiratory Diseases and the Potential for Pulmonary Delivery

Respiratory diseases are the cause of millions of deaths annually around the world. Despite the recent growth of our understanding of underlying mechanisms contributing to the pathogenesis of lung diseases, most therapeutic approaches are still limited to symptomatic treatments and therapies that only delay disease progression. Several clinical and preclinical studies have suggested stem cell (SC) therapy as a promising approach for treating various lung diseases. However, challenges such as the potential tumorigenicity, the low survival rate of the SCs in the recipient body, and difficulties in cell culturing and storage have limited the applicability of SC therapy. SC-derived extracellular vesicles (SC-EVs), particularly SC-derived exosomes (SC-Exos), exhibit most therapeutic properties of stem cells without their potential drawbacks. Similar to SCs, SC-Exos exhibit immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic properties with the potential to be employed in the treatment of various inflammatory and chronic respiratory diseases. Furthermore, recent studies have demonstrated that the microRNA (miRNA) content of SC-Exos may play a crucial role in the therapeutic potential of these exosomes. Several studies have investigated the administration of SC-Exos via the pulmonary route, and techniques for SCs and SC-Exos delivery to the lungs by intratracheal instillation or inhalation have been developed. Here, we review the literature discussing the therapeutic effects of SC-Exos against respiratory diseases and advances in the pulmonary route of delivery of these exosomes to the damaged tissues.

The Impact of Head Model Choice on the In Vitro Evaluation of Aerosol Drug Delivery

There are variations in the values reported for aerosol drug delivery across in vitro experiments throughout the published literature, and often with the same devices or similar experimental setups. Factors contributing to this variability include, but are not limited to device type, equipment settings, drug type and quantification methods. This study assessed the impact of head model choice on aerosol drug delivery using six different adults and three different paediatric head models in combination with a facemask, mouthpiece, and high-flow nasal cannula. Under controlled test conditions, the quantity of drug collected varied depending on the choice of head model. Head models vary depending on a combination of structural design differences, facial features (size and structure), internal volume measurements and airway geometries and these variations result in the differences in aerosol delivery. Of the widely available head models used in this study, only three were seen to closely predict in vivo aerosol delivery performance in adults compared with published scintigraphy data. Further, this testing identified the limited utility of some head models under certain test conditions, for example, the range reported across head models was aerosol drug delivery of 2.62 ± 2.86% to 37.79 ± 1.55% when used with a facemask. For the first time, this study highlights the impact of head model choice on reported aerosol drug delivery within a laboratory setting and contributes to explaining the differences in values reported within the literature.