1
|
Foti RS. Utility of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in predicting and characterizing clinical drug interactions. Drug Metab Dispos 2025; 53:100021. [PMID: 39884811 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.123.001384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is a mechanistic dynamic modeling approach that can be used to predict or retrospectively describe changes in drug exposure due to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). With advancements in commercially available PBPK software, PBPK DDI modeling has become a mainstream approach from early drug discovery through to late-stage drug development and is often used to support regulatory packages for new drug applications. This Minireview will briefly describe the approaches to predicting DDI using PBPK and static modeling approaches, the basic model structures and features inherent to PBPK DDI models, and key examples where PBPK DDI models have been used to describe complex DDI mechanisms. Future directions aimed at using PBPK models to characterize transporter-mediated DDI, predict DDI in special populations, and assess the DDI potential of protein therapeutics will be discussed. A summary of the 209 PBPK DDI examples published to date in 2023 will be provided. Overall, current data and trends suggest a continued role for PBPK models in the characterization and prediction of DDI for therapeutic molecules. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models have been a key tool in the characterization of various pharmacokinetic phenomena, including drug-drug interactions. This Minireview will highlight recent advancements and publications around physiologically based pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction modeling, an important area of drug discovery and development research in light of the increasing prevalence of polypharmacology in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S Foti
- Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics, Metabolism and Bioanalytics, Merck & Co, Inc, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang Y, Wang Z, Wang Y, Jin W, Zhang Z, Jin L, Qian J, Zheng L. CYP3A4 and CYP3A5: the crucial roles in clinical drug metabolism and the significant implications of genetic polymorphisms. PeerJ 2024; 12:e18636. [PMID: 39650550 PMCID: PMC11625447 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2024] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 12/11/2024] Open
Abstract
CYP3A, a key member of the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) superfamily, is integral to drug metabolism, processing a substantial portion of medications. Their role in drug metabolism is particularly prominent, as CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 metabolize approximately 30-50% of known drugs. The genetic polymorphism of CYP3A4/5 is significant inter-individual variability in enzymatic activity, which can result in different pharmacokinetic profiles in response to the same drug among individuals. These polymorphisms can lead to either increased drug toxicity or reduced therapeutic effects, requiring dosage adjustments based on genetic profiles. Consequently, the study of the enzymatic activity of CYP3A4/5 gene variants is of great importance for the formulation of personalized treatment regimens. This article first reviews the role of CYP3A4/5 in drug metabolism in the human body, including inhibitors and inducers of CYP3A4/5 and drug-drug interactions. In terms of genetic polymorphism, it discusses the detection methods, enzymatic kinetic characteristics, and clinical guidelines for CYP3A5. Finally, the article summarizes the importance of CYP3A4/5 in clinical applications, including personalized therapy, management of drug-drug interactions, and adjustment of drug doses. This review contributes to the understanding of the functions and genetic characteristics of CYP3A4/5, allowing for more effective clinical outcomes through optimized drug therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqing Zhang
- Affiliated Yueqing Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Molecular Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ziying Wang
- Institute of Molecular Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yuchao Wang
- Institute of Molecular Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Weikai Jin
- Institute of Molecular Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zheyan Zhang
- Institute of Molecular Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lehao Jin
- Institute of Molecular Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jianchang Qian
- Affiliated Yueqing Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Molecular Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Long Zheng
- Affiliated Yueqing Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gunwhy ER, Hines CDG, Green C, Laitinen I, Tadimalla S, Hockings PD, Schütz G, Kenna JG, Sourbron S, Waterton JC. Assessment of hepatic transporter function in rats using dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced MRI: a reproducibility study. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2024; 37:697-708. [PMID: 39105950 PMCID: PMC11417070 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-024-01192-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous studies have revealed a substantial between-centre variability in DCE-MRI biomarkers of hepatocellular function in rats. This study aims to identify the main sources of variability by comparing data measured at different centres and field strengths, at different days in the same subjects, and over the course of several months in the same centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS 13 substudies were conducted across three facilities on two 4.7 T and two 7 T scanners using a 3D spoiled gradient echo acquisition. All substudies included 3-6 male Wistar-Han rats each, either scanned once with vehicle (n = 76) or twice with either vehicle (n = 19) or 10 mg/kg of rifampicin (n = 13) at follow-up. Absolute values, between-centre reproducibility, within-subject repeatability, detection limits, and effect sizes were derived for hepatocellular uptake rate (Ktrans) and biliary excretion rate (kbh). Sources of variability were identified using analysis of variance and stratification by centre, field strength, and time period. RESULTS Data showed significant differences between substudies of 31% for Ktrans (p = 0.013) and 43% for kbh (p < 0.001). Within-subject differences were substantially smaller for kbh (8%) but less so for Ktrans (25%). Rifampicin-induced inhibition was safely above the detection limits, with an effect size of 75 ± 3% in Ktrans and 67 ± 8% in kbh. Most of the variability in individual data was accounted for by between-subject (Ktrans = 23.5%; kbh = 42.5%) and between-centre (Ktrans = 44.9%; kbh = 50.9%) variability, substantially more than the between-day variation (Ktrans = 0.1%; kbh = 5.6%). Significant differences in kbh were found between field strengths at the same centre, between centres at the same field strength, and between repeat experiments over 2 months apart in the same centre. DISCUSSION Between-centre bias caused by factors such as hardware differences, subject preparations, and operator dependence is the main source of variability in DCE-MRI of liver function in rats, closely followed by biological between-subject differences. Future method development should focus on reducing these sources of error to minimise the sample sizes needed to detect more subtle levels of inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebony R Gunwhy
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Polaris, 18 Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK.
| | | | - Claudia Green
- MR & CT Contrast Media Research, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany
| | - Iina Laitinen
- Antaros Medical, GoCo House, Mölndal, Sweden
- Sanofi-Aventis GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sirisha Tadimalla
- Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paul D Hockings
- Antaros Medical, GoCo House, Mölndal, Sweden
- Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Schütz
- MR & CT Contrast Media Research, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Steven Sourbron
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Polaris, 18 Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK
| | - John C Waterton
- Bioxydyn Ltd, St. James Tower, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Imaging Sciences, Division of Informatics Imaging & Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Galetin A, Brouwer KLR, Tweedie D, Yoshida K, Sjöstedt N, Aleksunes L, Chu X, Evers R, Hafey MJ, Lai Y, Matsson P, Riselli A, Shen H, Sparreboom A, Varma MVS, Yang J, Yang X, Yee SW, Zamek-Gliszczynski MJ, Zhang L, Giacomini KM. Membrane transporters in drug development and as determinants of precision medicine. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2024; 23:255-280. [PMID: 38267543 PMCID: PMC11464068 DOI: 10.1038/s41573-023-00877-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
The effect of membrane transporters on drug disposition, efficacy and safety is now well recognized. Since the initial publication from the International Transporter Consortium, significant progress has been made in understanding the roles and functions of transporters, as well as in the development of tools and models to assess and predict transporter-mediated activity, toxicity and drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Notable advances include an increased understanding of the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on transporter activity, the application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling in predicting transporter-mediated drug disposition, the identification of endogenous biomarkers to assess transporter-mediated DDIs and the determination of the cryogenic electron microscopy structures of SLC and ABC transporters. This article provides an overview of these key developments, highlighting unanswered questions, regulatory considerations and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Galetin
- Centre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Kim L R Brouwer
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Kenta Yoshida
- Clinical Pharmacology, Genentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Noora Sjöstedt
- Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lauren Aleksunes
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Xiaoyan Chu
- Department of Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics, Metabolism, and Bioanalytics, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| | - Raymond Evers
- Preclinical Sciences and Translational Safety, Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Spring House, PA, USA
| | - Michael J Hafey
- Department of Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics, Metabolism, and Bioanalytics, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| | - Yurong Lai
- Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, CA, USA
| | - Pär Matsson
- Department of Pharmacology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Andrew Riselli
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hong Shen
- Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Bristol Myers Squibb Research and Development, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Alex Sparreboom
- Division of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Manthena V S Varma
- Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Medicine Design, Worldwide R&D, Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA
| | - Jia Yang
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Xinning Yang
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Sook Wah Yee
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Lei Zhang
- Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Kathleen M Giacomini
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|