Antimicrobial Desensitization: A Review of Published Protocols

Diagnosis and clinical management of drug allergies in obstetrics and gynecology: an expert review

Drug allergies, specifically antibiotic allergies, are frequently encountered in obstetrics and gynecology, with 10% of the US population reporting a penicillin allergy. This poses a particular challenge to the obstetrician-gynecologist, as beta-lactam antibiotics are indicated as first-line therapy for the treatment and prevention of most specialty-specific infections. Alternative antibiotic use in the setting of a reported allergy is not benign and has been associated with increased cesarean delivery, endometritis, wound complication, length of hospital stay in pregnant patients, Group B Streptococcus sepsis, neonatal length of stay, neonatal laboratory draw in neonates born to patients with allergies, and surgical site infection in gynecologic patients. Furthermore, alternative antibiotic use leads to increased antibiotic resistance, toxicity, and healthcare cost. In addition, the administration of antibiotics in a patient with a history of type I immediate hypersensitivity reaction poses a risk of anaphylaxis with repeat exposure. Fortunately, >90% of patients who report a penicillin allergy are not truly allergic and would tolerate penicillins if administered. This can be due to either mislabeling of the index reaction as an allergy (when it was due to a drug intolerance or a viral exanthem) or waning immunoglobulin E-mediated immunity over time. Given this, allergy evaluation is widely recommended, even in pregnancy. Allergy evaluation involves detailed patient history and allergy testing with skin testing and/or oral challenge, as appropriate. These tools have been found to be safe and effective in gravid and nongravid individuals and to result in increased use of first-line antibiotics when used appropriately. Furthermore, even in the setting of a true penicillin allergy, cross-reactivity with cephalosporins is extremely low and estimated at 2% to 3% among patients with a verified penicillin allergy and considerably lower than this among patients with an unverified penicillin allergy. Guidelines support the routine use of cephalosporins without testing or additional precautions in patients with an unverified nonanaphylactic penicillin allergy and the routine use of structurally dissimilar cephalosporins (specifically Ancef) even in patients with an anaphylactic penicillin allergy. In cases in which there is no appropriate alternative antibiotic than that for which the patient is allergic, such as syphilis in a pregnant patient with penicillin allergy, desensitization can be performed. This process involves temporary induction of drug tolerance through exposure to small amounts of the allergen until a therapeutic dose is achieved and has been safely performed in pregnancy. Desensitization requires expert supervision and is most often performed in the intensive care setting with a multidisciplinary team. The other 2 most common antibiotic allergies encountered in the field of obstetrics and gynecology are cephalosporin and metronidazole allergies. Cephalosporin allergies are managed similarly to penicillin allergies with readily available skin testing and oral challenge. Skin testing for metronidazole allergy lacks sensitivity and specificity, and thus, oral challenge or desensitization procedure is the preferred approach for low-risk and high-risk patients, respectively. When it comes to drug allergies, specifically antibiotic allergies, the role of the obstetrician-gynecologist is to identify patients with reported allergies and to refer patients to a specialist for further evaluation as soon as possible. Allergy evaluation using a detailed patient history and allergy testing (skin testing and/or oral challenge) when indicated has been shown to be safe and effective and is an important part of antibiotic stewardship.

Implementation of a multidisciplinary inpatient drug desensitization program

PURPOSE

The purpose of this project was to analyze the process of adult inpatient drug desensitization and to create a multidisciplinary standardized procedure with the aim of improving patient safety, efficiency, length of stay, and patient satisfaction.

SUMMARY

A team consisting of physicians, pharmacists, nurses, critical care specialists, and operational capacity managers was created. The electronic health system was queried to evaluate the frequency of desensitizations, level of care, implicated medications, and length of stay. An electronic desensitization request form was created along with a desensitization team and email listserver for notification of key stakeholders.

CONCLUSION

A standardized, safe, and efficient process for inpatient drug desensitization requires advance planning and participation from all disciplines involved. Operational and logistical aspects of desensitization are crucial components of rapid drug desensitization. A structured, multidisciplinary approach to inpatient desensitization is feasible.

Desensitization in children allergic to drugs: Indications, protocols, and limits

Any drug can potentially induce a hypersensitivity reaction. If after the allergological work-up the drug hypersensitivity reaction is confirmed, in most cases, the simple avoidance of the culprit drug and a suggestion of an unrelated alternative is enough. However, there are circumstances where the choice to stop the treatment affects the survival, the safety and/or the quality of life of the patient and the global outcome of the disease in question. When this occurs, drug desensitization can be the answer and should not be viewed as an extravagance, nor the pediatric age should be considered a contraindication. Drug desensitization in children can be safely and successfully performed, having a positive impact on the survival and overall prognosis. In general, the indications for DDS are the same in adults as in children. However, in this age group there are specificities that this paper aimed to describe, reviewing the mechanisms behind drug hypersensitivity and rapid drug desensitization, types of protocols, indications, and contraindications, as well as several technical aspects that are specific to the pediatric age.

Antibiotic desensitization as a potential tool in antimicrobial stewardship programs: retrospective data analysis and systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES

Antibiotic allergy labels (AAL) are related to worse therapeutic results. Strategies to improve the management of these patients, such as the implementation of antibiotic desensitization, are essential for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP). The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antibiotic desensitization procedures for the management of patients with AAL.

METHODS

A retrospective study from 2015 to 2022 was performed to describe all antibiotic desensitization conducted in our institution, within the framework of ASP. A systematic literature review using electronic databases, such as PubMed, was also done to identify studies describing antibiotic desensitization between 2000 and 2022.

RESULTS

Sixteen antibiotic desensitization protocols were carried out in our institution. In fourteen cases, the desensitization was successfully completed, and the antibiotic could be used to treat the infection. In the systematic review, twenty-two studies were included, with a total of 202 desensitization episodes . In 97% of them, the desensitization was completed successfully. No desensitization-related mortality was observed neither in our cohort nor in literature review.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic desensitization strategies should be considered a safe and effective tool that can be included in ASP for patients with a high risk of or confirmed allergy to penicillin.

If At First You Don't Succeed, Trikafta Again

Adverse reactions, including severe cutaneous reactions, to cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators have been described in the literature. Herein we present a drug eruption in response to elexacaftor/tezcaftor/ivacaftor (brand name, Trikafta) in a 7-year-old male with cystic fibrosis, followed by desensitization and successful continuation. A review of the literature outlining similar cases is provided. Attempting to mitigate and manage drug reactions to CFTR modulators is essential because they represent vital and irreplaceable therapies for individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF).

Framework for sensitization assessment of extractables and leachables in pharmaceuticals

During the toxicological assessment of extractables and leachables in drug products, localized hazards such as irritation or sensitization may be identified. Typically, because of the low concentration at which leachables occur in pharmaceuticals, irritation is of minimal concern; therefore, this manuscript focuses on sensitization potential. The primary objective of performing a leachable sensitization assessment is protection against Type IV induction of sensitization, rather than prevention of an elicitation response, as it is not possible to account for the immunological state of every individual. Sensitizers have a wide range of potencies and those which induce sensitization upon exposure at a low concentration (i.e. strong, or extreme sensitizers) pose the highest risk to patients and should be the focus of the risk assessment. The Extractables and Leachables Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE) consortium has reviewed the status of dermal, respiratory, and systemic risk assessment in cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries, and proposes a framework to evaluate the safety of known or potential dermal sensitizers in pharmaceuticals. Due to the lack of specific regulatory guidance on this topic, the science-driven risk-based approach proposed by ELSIE encourages consistency in the toxicological assessment of extractables and leachables to maintain high product quality and ensure patient safety.

Temporal Modulation of Drug Desensitization Procedures

Drug hypersensitivity reactions are an unavoidable clinical consequence of the presence of new therapeutic agents. These adverse reactions concern patients afflicted with infectious diseases (e.g., hypersensitivity to antibiotics), and with non-infectious chronic diseases, such as in cancers, diabetes or cystic fibrosis treatments, and may occur at the first drug administration or after repeated exposures. Here we revise recent key studies on the mechanisms underlying the desensitization protocols, and propose an additional temporal regulation layer that is based on the circadian control of the signaling pathway involved and on the modulation of the memory effects established by the desensitization procedures.

Immediate and Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions to Antibiotics: Aminoglycosides, Clindamycin, Linezolid, and Metronidazole

Hypersensitivity reactions including IgE-mediated and delayed cell-mediated reactions to aminoglycosides, clindamycin, linezolid, and metronidazole are rare. For aminoglycosides, allergic contact dermatitis is the most frequent reaction for which patch testing can be a useful step in evaluation. For clindamycin, delayed maculopapular exanthems are the most common reactions. There are case reports of clindamycin associated with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis, and symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE). For linezolid, cases of hypersensitivity were exceedingly rare and included urticaria, angioedema, anaphylaxis, delayed rashes, and DRESS. For metronidazole, only rare cases were found across a broad spectrum of reactions including allergic contact dermatitis, fixed drug eruption, angioedema, anaphylaxis, serum sickness-like reaction, SJS/TEN, AGEP, SDRIFE, and a possible case of DRESS. IgE-mediated reactions and anaphylaxis to these types of antibiotics are uncommon, and reports of skin testing concentrations and desensitization protocols are largely limited to case reports and series. Non-irritating skin testing concentrations have been reported for gentamycin, tobramycin, and clindamycin. Published desensitization protocols for intravenous and inhaled tobramycin, oral clindamycin, intravenous linezolid, and oral and intravenous metronidazole have also been reported and are reviewed.

Evaluation of desensitization protocols to betalactam antibiotics

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Betalactam antibiotics are the most frequent cause of hypersensitivity reactions. Rapid drug desensitization (RDD) is a technique that induces temporary tolerance to a drug allowing a patient to receive the optimal agent. The increased use of RDD and the lack of standardization among available protocols in terms of formulation, starting dose, number of steps and dosing frequency make it essential to determine the safety and appropriate management of these protocols, especially regarding reconstitution, diluents, stability and drug administration in order to guarantee reproducibility. We reviewed betalactam desensitization protocols in a tertiary hospital, in accordance with currently published practices and evaluated its use on patients over a period of three years.

METHODS

(a) We performed a literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases for case reports and/or systematic reviews describing desensitization protocols for betalactam antibiotics. Pharmacokinetic parameters and physicochemical stability were checked for each antibiotic. (b) We retrospectively reviewed inpatients undergoing our antibiotic desensitization protocols from February 2018 to January 2021. Data and outcomes of desensitization procedures were analysed.

RESULTS

We developed nine RDD protocols: meropenem, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, ampicillin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, cloxacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, amoxicillin/clavulanate and penicillin G sodium. Five antibiotics have RDD protocols for two different doses, adjusted to patients with impaired renal function. Detailed data (diluent, total dose, volume, concentrations, duration and stability) of the protocol of each antibiotic used are provided. 28 desensitizations were performed in 17 patients, three of them with confirmed allergies by skin test. 26 out of 28 (92.9%) of them were successfully completed, including those three with positive skin results. The pathogens most frequently involved were E. faecalis and P. aeruginosa; both frequently associated with bacterial resistance. Meropenem, ceftriaxone and ceftazidime were the antibiotics most desensitized. 25 out of 26 (96.1%) procedures were successful in resolving the infection.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

Detailed information about compounding, dilution and stability is crucial to ensure safe and successful desensitization processes, as well as good coordination between the Allergy and Pharmacy departments. The increase in bacterial resistance to many of the commercially available antibiotics limits the therapeutic options for treating multidrug-resistant infections; in those situations, antibiotic desensitization may be a key therapeutic option. Although there is a broad consensus in limiting the use of RDD to patients with confirmed allergy, in usual clinical practice its application in those strongly suspected of having type I hypersensitivity is still observed. Our betalactam desensitization protocols have shown themselves to be safe and effective, as evidenced by data from the 17 patients on whom they have been tested.

Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021

These guidelines for the treatment of persons who have or are at risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) were updated by CDC after consultation with professionals knowledgeable in the field of STIs who met in Atlanta, Georgia, June 11-14, 2019. The information in this report updates the 2015 guidelines. These guidelines discuss 1) updated recommendations for treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Trichomonas vaginalis; 2) addition of metronidazole to the recommended treatment regimen for pelvic inflammatory disease; 3) alternative treatment options for bacterial vaginosis; 4) management of Mycoplasma genitalium; 5) human papillomavirus vaccine recommendations and counseling messages; 6) expanded risk factors for syphilis testing among pregnant women; 7) one-time testing for hepatitis C infection; 8) evaluation of men who have sex with men after sexual assault; and 9) two-step testing for serologic diagnosis of genital herpes simplex virus. Physicians and other health care providers can use these guidelines to assist in prevention and treatment of STIs.

Overview of Beta-Lactam Allergy and the Role of the Pharmacist in Management

Unverified beta-lactam allergies are a substantial public health problem, as the majority of patients labeled as beta-lactam allergic do not have clinically significant allergies that may hinder the use beta-lactam therapy when indicated. Outdated or inaccurate beta-lactam or penicillin allergies can result in serious consequences, including suboptimal antibiotic therapy, increased risk of adverse effects, and use of broader spectrum antibiotics than indicated, which may contribute to antimicrobial resistance. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of beta-lactam allergy and highlight the role of pharmacists in managing beta-lactam allergies. Studies have shown that pharmacists can play a vital role in allergy assessment, penicillin skin testing, beta-lactam desensitization, evaluation of beta-lactam cross-reactivity and recommending appropriate antibiotic therapy in patients with beta-lactam allergies.

Case Report: Maintenance of Desensitization to Nebulized Colomycin Over 10 Years

Drug desensitization can be achieved successfully by gradual drug dose increases in different protocols. Most protocols are designed to obtain temporal tolerance. The data on long-term maintenance of drug tolerance is scarce. Based on an IgE-mediated colomycin allergy we describe the maintenance of drug tolerance to nebulized drug for the period of 10 years in a 15-year-old cystic fibrosis patient, proceeded by successful rush intravenous desensitization protocol. The mechanism of drug tolerance is largely speculative; however, long-term maintenance of it seems achievable by continuous local drug application.