The Expanding Role of the Oncology Pharmacist

Managing adherence, exposure, and toxicity in oral anticancer therapies

The management of adherence, exposure risk, and adverse effects in oral anticancer agents (OAAs) is essential for optimizing patient outcomes in oncology pharmacy. This review highlights key efforts to enhance adherence, reduce occupational exposure, and improve adverse effect management in OAA therapy.(1) Adherence management.We evaluated adherence to trifluridine/tipiracil hydrochloride (TFTD) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, revealing an overall adherence rate of 85.0%. Common factors affecting adherence included nausea, vomiting, and cancer-related pain. Pharmacist-led interventions, including antiemetic therapy and patient education, significantly improved compliance.(2) Exposure risk management.A study on spill kit usage found that 91.7% of incidents involved nurses, with most spills occurring in hospital wards. Following a medical safety workshop, compliance with personal protective equipment (PPE) protocols improved to 100%. These findings emphasize the need for continuous safety training and enhanced spill management protocols.(3) Adverse effect management.We examined regorafenib-induced adverse effects, particularly hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) and hypothyroidism. HFSR occurred in 81.4% of patients, with severe cases (≥ Grade 2) associated with prolonged survival. Routine thyroid function monitoring was essential, as 42.8% of patients developed thyroid dysfunction, with 5.7% requiring hormone replacement therapy. Early intervention and supportive care strategies improved treatment tolerability.This review underscores the importance of pharmacist-driven interventions in enhancing adherence, ensuring occupational safety, and managing adverse effects. Continued research and collaboration are essential to optimize OAA-based therapy and improve patient care in oncology pharmacy.

Fukushima Outpatient Pharmacotherapy Model for Breast Cancer

The Fukushima Model of Outpatient Pharmacotherapy for Breast Cancer was developed to improve the pharmacological treatment of patients with breast cancer in the vast region of Fukushima Prefecture. This model addresses the challenges posed by the area's lower-than-average density of breast cancer specialists. In the core medical institutions of the prefecture's most populous municipalities, we introduced a telephone consultation service managed by pharmacists at local dispensing pharmacies. The novelty of the Fukushima model lies in two distinct elements: a structured checklist-style tracking report and comprehensive patient information sheets. This innovative tool streamlines a range of processes, including patient self-assessment of symptomatology associated with treatment-related side effects, subsequent medical interventions, and a standardized protocol for reporting severe side effects to healthcare practitioners. This approach facilitates the safe administration of breast cancer pharmacotherapy in home settings. In the future, this model could be used beyond Japan to underserved regions globally, thereby increasing the standard of breast cancer care on a wider scale.

Clinical and economic impact of oncology-trained pharmacist integration in an ambulatory cancer clinic

INTRODUCTION

Outpatient oncology practice is a growing area of opportunity for pharmacists to provide clinical services and evidence-based care.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective chart review analyzed the clinical and economic benefits of a board-certified oncology pharmacist after integration into the ambulatory oncology clinic setting. Primary outcomes were total cost avoidance for pharmacist interventions and impact on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) OP-35 measures. Pharmacist interventions were characterized into distinct types which were then assigned a cost avoidance value. Cost avoidance was calculated per hour and then extrapolated to a yearly estimate based on a 40-h work week for one year for one full-time equivalent pharmacist. Data collection for the primary clinical outcome was performed by compiling provider-specific emergency department (ED) and inpatient admission rates for diagnoses specified in CMS OP-35 measures within 30 days after receiving outpatient chemotherapy. The rates for the data collection period were compared to the rates six months prior to pharmacist integration to assess pharmacist impact.

RESULTS

In six months, 516 total interventions were made by the oncology pharmacist. The incidence of ED visits was 3.34% and 1.72% during the pre- and post-pharmacist intervention periods, respectively. The incidence of inpatient admissions was 2.43% and 0.34% pre- and post-pharmacist intervention, respectively. Total cost avoidance was estimated to be US$375,795 and when accounted for the median pharmacist salary at our institution, total cost savings was US$204,437.

CONCLUSION

The presence of an oncology pharmacist specialist in the ambulatory cancer clinic provided clinical and economic benefits to the cancer clinic.

A Hybrid Type III Effectiveness-Implementation Trial to Optimize Medication Safety With Oral Antitumor Therapy in Real-World: The AMBORA Competence and Consultation Center

PURPOSE

Implementation science endeavors to facilitate the translation of evidence-based research into clinical routine. The clinical pharmacological/pharmaceutical care program evaluated in the randomized AMBORA trial on medication safety with oral antitumor therapeutics (OAT) optimizes care delivery and provides significant benefits for patients, treatment teams, and health care systems. Thus, we aimed to investigate the implementation of this care program within the AMBORA Competence and Consultation Center (AMBORA Center).

METHODS

The AMBORA Center within a University Comprehensive Cancer Center offered several services (eg, patient consultations) and was evaluated according to the RE-AIM framework. This multicenter hybrid type III trial focused on implementation outcomes (eg, patient recruitment, referring units, evaluation of services) while concurrently investigating effectiveness (eg, side effects, medication errors). Quantitative and qualitative assessments were combined.

RESULTS

The AMBORA Center conducted over 800 consultations with 420 patients in seven institutions. The primary end point of counseling 70% of patients treated with OAT was not reached. Patients were referred by 15 treatment units compared with 11 units in the AMBORA trial. On the basis of heterogeneous referral rates and characteristics across the institutions, barriers and facilitators of the implementation process were derived. Several survey results (eg, stakeholder interviews, online/paper-based questionnaires) reflected a high appreciation of services by patients and health care professionals. The severity of 60.1% (178 of 296) of detected side effects improved, and 86.3% (297 of 344) of medication errors were resolved.

CONCLUSION

Despite not reaching the primary implementation outcome, the AMBORA Center included more treatment units and demonstrated patient benefit of the AMBORA care program by meeting all effectiveness outcomes. We outlined quantitative and qualitative implementation characteristics to enhance outreach and foster further dissemination of centers to optimize medication safety with OAT.

Clinical Pharmacist-Led Interventions for Improving Breast Cancer Management-A Scoping Review

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide and the fifth most common cause of cancer death overall. Most women with breast cancer have a good prognosis if the cancer is detected at an early stage and the patients have access to the appropriate treatment and disease management. This study aims to evaluate the impact of pharmacist-led interventions on breast cancer management and health outcomes. A literature review was carried out through the scientific databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using predefined keywords. Only full-text original articles written in English that investigated the role of the pharmacist in the management of breast cancer were included in the final analysis. No publication date limits were set. A total of 1625 articles were retrieved from the electronic databases, of which 14 met the inclusion criteria. The current scoping review consists of different study types, including randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, pre-post studies, retrospective cohort studies, quality improvement projects, case-control studies, and one pharmacoeconomic study. Pharmacists commonly provided the following interventions: consultations regarding chemotherapy treatment, risk assessment and patient education, adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions detection, and adherence assessment. This scoping review highlights the beneficial effects of the involvement of pharmacists in breast cancer management, such as better quality of life, reduced drug interaction risk, greater adherence rates, and improved patient knowledge. This confirms the importance of including the pharmacist in the oncology team caring for patients with breast cancer.

Direct Clinical Pharmacist-Patient Telephone Follow-Up: A Focus on GI Medical Oncology Symptom Management

PURPOSE

GI medical oncology care presents unique medication challenges. Here, we captured our clinical pharmacy specialists' (CPSs) involvement in patients with GI cancers starting cycle 1 of a new treatment.

METHODS

Our quality initiative was performed in three stages (preintervention, intervention, and postintervention). Preintervention: retrospective baseline data collection from May to December 2019. Intervention: one-time telephone encounters were conducted by a CPS between March 15 and June 11, 2021. The primary objective of the quality improvement initiative was to increase patient interaction with a CPS to 80%. Postintervention: data collection to review the impact of CPS telephone encounters.

RESULTS

Preintervention: we reviewed the electronic health records of 262 patients. Sixty nine percent of patients reported at least one adverse event (AE; range 1-6 AEs) at the first physician follow-up after treatment start. Most reported AEs (78%) were considered modifiable within the scope of CPS practice. Postintervention: during the intervention, 92% of patients (n = 389) received a telehealth encounter with the CPS. At the encounter, 315 patients (81%) reported at least one AE. CPS provided recommendations and/or additional education for 88% of reported AEs. Medication lists required correction 75% of the time. The median time for CPS encounters (including documentation) was 40 minutes.

CONCLUSION

During a 3-month period, this quality improvement initiative successfully provided an early CPS-based telehealth intervention to identify and make initial recommendations for management of AEs for patients on cycle 1 of systemic therapy for GI cancer.

Health-system specialty pharmacist intervention types, acceptance, and associated actions for patients with multiple sclerosis

PURPOSE

Health-system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) pharmacists play an integral role in the care of patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) by facilitating medication access, providing counseling, improving adherence, and decreasing provider workload. However, current literature detailing pharmacist interventions and their acceptance rates in this population is limited. The purpose of this study was to identify the types and acceptance rate of clinical interventions completed by pharmacists for PwMS.

METHODS

To evaluate the acceptance rate of HSSP pharmacist interventions, we conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational, descriptive study for the period from October 2019 to August 2022. Intervention types were categorized into reasons for intervention, recommendations from the pharmacists, and their acceptance rates.

RESULTS

For 225 patients enrolled in HSSP services, 449 interventions were completed, with an average of 2.0 interventions per patient. Most interventions identified were associated with medication adherence (28.7%), medication regimen (27.6%), adverse drug reaction (ADR) (20.7%), and laboratory values (15.1%). The average adherence, defined by the proportion of days covered, was 94%. The most common recommendations were to continue therapy (14.9%), schedule laboratory tests (12.7%), and follow up with providers (11.8%). Recommendations had an acceptance rate of 85.3%, with 3.8% of recommendations declined and 10.9% requiring follow-up with providers.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists impact patient outcomes through the completion of clinical interventions that improve adherence, identify medication regimen problems, manage ADRs, and coordinate proper laboratory testing. Pharmacist recommendations were most often accepted for interventions related to medication regimen and ADRs. Proper identification and management of medication regimen concerns, as well as tolerability of medications, can positively impact adherence and improve overall patient outcomes.

Impact of pharmacist-led interventions on medication-related problems among patients treated for cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

BACKGROUND

Medication-related problems (MRPs) continue to impose a voluminous health impact, particularly among patients on anti-cancer therapy, due to the nature and complexity of the care. Pharmacists have a pivotal role in ensuring the safe, effective, and rational use of medicines in this group of patients.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the impact of pharmacist-led interventions in resolving MRPs among patients treated for cancer.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted and reported following the PRISMA protocol and registered in PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42022311535). Four database searches, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and International Pharmaceuticals Abstracts, were systematically searched from August 2022 to January 2023. Only randomized control trials (RCTs) were included. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to check the quality of the included studies. The outcome measures were overall MRPs, adherence, medication errors, and adverse drug events (ADEs). Data for meta-analysis were analyzed used using STATA version 17 and standardized mean difference effect sizes were calculated for continuous outcomes and odds ratio for categorical outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of the 90 studies screened for eligibility, 20 RCT studies were included for the systematic review and 15 for the meta-analysis. Close to two-thirds of the studies were from Europe (n = 7) and Asia (n = 6). A combination of educational and behavioral intervention strategies were used for a period ranged from 8 days to 12 months. The pharmacist-led intervention improved adherence to treatment by 4.79 times (AOR = 4.79; 95%CI = 2.64, 8.68; p-value<0.0001), reduced the occurrence of ADEs by 1.28 (SMD = -1.28; 95%CI = -0.04-2.52; p-value = 0.04) and decreased the overall MRPs by 0.53 (SMD = -0.53; 95%CI = -0.79, -0.28; p-value<0.0001) compared to control groups.

CONCLUSION

This study found out that pharmacist-led interventions can significantly lower MRPs among patients treated for cancer. Hence, a global concerted effort has to be made to integrate pharmacists in a multidisciplinary direct cancer care.

The clinical and financial impact of remote clinical oncology pharmacist engagement in community-based practices within The US Oncology Network

INTRODUCTION

The integration of clinical oncology pharmacists into multidisciplinary healthcare teams is not well-described in the community practice setting. This study aims to analyze the clinical and financial impact of a remote-based clinical oncology pharmacist in four community oncology practices within The US Oncology Network.

METHODS

Oncology-trained clinical pharmacists electronically reviewed chemotherapy orders for clinical optimization and financial stewardship within four community oncology practices. Each pharmacist was appointed at 0.5 full-time equivalents per practice. Financial, clinical, and workload metrics were tracked to monitor the impact of pharmacist engagement.

RESULTS

Over 12 months, 5716 order reviews were completed with an intervention rate of 57%. The most common interventions identified by the pharmacists were interventions with clinical impact on the patient (36%), followed by dose rounding (35%) and therapeutic interchange (30%). Overall, interventions improved the cumulative practice margins by $1,455,033 and reduced total medication costs by $5,962,551. The average program return on investment was 415% (range 100-915%).

CONCLUSION

Community oncology practices seek to provide high-value care in a lean, resource-constrained model. An oncology clinical pharmacist is a cost-effective and clinically invaluable care team member in community oncology practice. Pharmacists in this setting identified opportunities to improve medication safety and regimen optimization and demonstrated a significant tremendous financial impact on small-scale budgets in community oncology.

Prescribing practices of oncology pharmacists working in ambulatory cancer centers in Alberta

OBJECTIVE

To describe and quantify independent prescribing of oncology pharmacists working in adult, ambulatory cancer centers in Alberta, Canada.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of oncology pharmacists prescribing in the electronic health record, ARIA® was conducted. Prescriptions from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2018 were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify prescription volume and class of medications prescribed. A cross-sectional analysis was then performed on a random sample to determine the type of prescription intervention and evaluate pharmacist documentation.

RESULTS

Over 6 months, 3474 prescriptions were ordered by 33 clinically deployed pharmacists. The median number of medications prescribed was 7 per month (interquartile range: 1.50-27.00; Range: 0.17-79.5). When prescribing was standardized by pharmacist's time clinically deployed, the median was 21.67 (interquartile range: 5.00-79.67; range: 0.67-216.67) prescriptions per month per full-time equivalent. The most prescribed class of medication was antiemetic (24.1%). From a sample of 346 prescriptions, 172 (50%) were new medications initiated, 160 (46%) were the continuation of existing prescriptions and 14 (4%) were prescription dosage adjustments. Adherence to the specified documentation standards was 47%.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncology pharmacists utilize their independent prescribing to initiate and continue supportive care medications for cancer patients. The prescribing volume varied greatly among pharmacists. Opportunities exist to further engage pharmacist prescribing.

Considering Sex and Gender in Therapeutics throughout the Product Life Cycle: A Narrative Review and Case Study of Gilteritinib

Background

Biological sex-related factors influence pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and disease processes that may affect the predictability of drug dosing and adverse effects, which may in turn have clinical consequences for patients' lives. Nonetheless, sex-related factors are not always taken into account in clinical trial design or clinical decision-making, for multiple reasons, including a paucity of studies that clearly and objectively study and measure sex-disaggregated and sex-related outcomes, as well as gaps in regulatory and policy structures for integrating these considerations.

Objectives

To complete a narrative review and use a case study to understand available evidence, inform future research, and provide policy considerations that incorporate information on sex- and gender-related factors into clinician-facing resources.

Methods

A comprehensive review of available literature was conducted using a sex- and gender-based analysis plus (SGBA Plus) approach to identify sex- and/or gender-disaggregated information for gilteritinib, a chemotherapeutic agent. Systematic searches were performed in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CENTRAL (Wiley), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (Ovid), Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov, from inception to March 18, 2021. The information was then summarized and compared with the Canadian product monograph for this drug.

Results

Of 311 records screened, 3 provided SGBA Plus information as a component of outcomes, rather than just as categories or demographic characteristics. Of these, 2 were case studies, and 1 was a clinical trial. No studies from the ClinicalTrials.gov database that were in progress at the time of this review provided details about sex-disaggregated outcomes. The Canadian product monograph did not include sex-disaggregated outcome data.

Conclusions

The available evidence from clinical trials, other published literature, and guidance documents does not provide details about sex-disaggregated outcomes for gilteritinib. This paucity of available evidence may create a challenge for clinicians who are making decisions about the efficacy and safety of prescribed therapies in sex-specific populations that have not been well studied.

Optimizing Medication Safety with Oral Antitumor Therapy: A Methodological Approach for the Real-World Implementation of the AMBORA Competence and Consultation Center

Generating evidence for the efficacy of an intervention is not sufficient to guarantee its implementation in real-world settings. The randomized AMBORA trial (Medication Safety with Oral Antitumor Therapy) demonstrated that an intensified clinical pharmacological/pharmaceutical care program has substantial benefits for patients, treatment teams, and the healthcare system. Thus, we are now investigating its implementation into routine care within the AMBORA Competence and Consultation Center (AMBORA Center). We perform a multicenter type III hybrid trial following the RE-AIM framework to assess the clinical effectiveness of this care program under real-world conditions, while evaluating the implementation outcomes. Semi-structured stakeholder interviews based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) have been conducted to identify barriers and facilitators. So far, 332 patients treated with oral antitumor drugs have been referred to the AMBORA Center by 66 physicians from 13 independent clinical units. In 20 stakeholder interviews (e.g., with clinic directors), 30% (6/20) of the interviewees anticipated possible barriers which may partly hinder sustainable implementation (e.g., unavailable consultation rooms). Furthermore, important facilitators (e.g., operational processes) were identified. This methodological description adds knowledge on how to structure a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial and proposes multilevel implementation strategies to improve the medication safety of oral antitumor therapy.

Clinical clerkship at an oncology hospital based on the curriculum of a clinical pharmacy program from a university belonging to low-middle-income country: Insights from a pharmacy program experience

Nepal, a low-middle-income country, is relatively new to clinical pharmacy. Although the program started in 2000 with several universities running it as of today, the effectiveness of this program has been under discussion since its inception regarding its syllabus, practical issues, clinical postings, and importance in hospital settings. In this commentary, we share our 14 days of experience of a clinical clerkship period carried out under a curriculum of a university constituent school in an oncology-based hospital with a clinical pharmacy department providing clinical pharmacy services.

Implementation of the Patient Counselling Service at the Cancer Hospital in Radom, Poland

Background: Non-adherence occurs in various groups of patients, including those with chronic diseases. One strategy to increase adherence among oncological patients is to individualise treatment and expand pharmaceutical care. Pharmaceutical labels that remind patients how they should take their medications are of great importance in this respect. Objective: The main objective of this study was to evaluate medication adherence in oncological patients, and to gather their opinions on the individual medication labelling system as an element of effective treatment. Methods: The study was conducted in 2021 among 82 patients of the oncological department of the Centre of Oncology in Radom. The research tool was a questionnaire consisting of personal data and two parts relating to the patient's disease and the medication labelling system. Results: Nearly half of the respondents reported that they forget to take medications and how they should take them. These problems increased with the age of the patient and the number of administered medications. Of the respondents, 89% stated that the labels with dosing information are helpful. Over 67% agreed that these labels should be affixed to all medications. Nearly 90% of the respondents believed the labels should be available in all pharmacies. Conclusions: Non-adherence is a common phenomenon among oncological patients. Pharmacists providing a labelling service for medicinal products can play a significant role in reducing this phenomenon.

Beyond the Classroom: An Observational Study to Assess Student Pharmacists' Confidence and Perception of a High-Fidelity Manikin Chemotherapy Infusion Reaction Simulation

Objective: To assess the impact of a high-fidelity manikin chemotherapy infusion simulation on student pharmacists' confidence in applying clinical knowledge and perception of oncology pharmacy practice. Methods: One cohort of third professional year student pharmacists completed a high-fidelity manikin simulation during the last week of their didactic training. The 10-minute manikin experience simulated an acute paclitaxel infusion reaction, requiring students to apply their knowledge on how to provide patient care during a chemotherapy-induced infusion reaction. A pre- and post-survey was administered to determine whether there was a change in students' confidence and perception. Results: Thirty-three student pharmacists (62%) completed the pre- and post-surveys and manikin simulation. A statistically significant improvement was seen in median confidence scores when comparing pre- and post-questions of all 10 survey items (P < 0.001). Students' perception of oncology pharmacy and the manikin simulation had mean of 4.4 on a 0- to 5-point Likert scale. Conclusion: The high-fidelity manikin experience improved student pharmacists' post-survey confidence of applying clinical skills. In addition, students' perception of oncology pharmacy improved and the use of a manikin simulation to support didactic learning was seen as an additional avenue for delivering didactic curriculum. This study explored the feasibility of introducing a manikin simulation into the oncology pharmacy curriculum and the benefit of providing hands-on application of clinical skills to support didactic concept-based learning.

Expanding oncology pharmacist teams: Justifying the return on investment

Oncology pharmacists are an integral member of the cancer care multi-disciplinary team. Despite the role being previously well defined, responsibilities continue to expand. Position justification for pharmacists is a challenge with prerequisites to optimize efficient processes, promote quality and reduce overall costs. Initiation and implementation of new oncology pharmacist services requires a clear description of value to the organization and a strong understanding of workflows. Position justifications must be data-driven and unique to the organization's need and should include physician or key stakeholder support, quality initiatives, cost-savings initiatives, and revenue-generating roles. The cases and examples described serve as a reference for individuals, teams, or organizations pursuing the value of a financial investment of an oncology pharmacist to expand or initiate new pharmacy services.

Influence of the implementation of a multidisciplinary consultation program on adherence to the first ever course of oral antineoplastic treatment in patients with cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate adherence (as measured by the medication possession ratio) to the first ever course of oral antineoplasic treatment in cancer patients before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary consultation program (involving an oncologist, a pharmacist, and a nurse) and to investigate the program's impact on adverse events and drug-related problems.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective single-center study, we compared the medication possession ratio 2 months after treatment initiation in a control group (before multidisciplinary consultation program implementation) versus an interventional group (after multidisciplinary consultation program implementation).

RESULTS

Two months after oral antineoplasic treatment initiation, the mean ± standard deviation medication possession ratio did not differ significantly when comparing the interventional (multidisciplinary consultation program) group (n = 33; 0.99 ± 0.06) with the control group (n = 64; 0.94 ± 0.16) (p = 0.062). Patients in the multidisciplinary consultation program group had fewer adverse events in general (41, vs 109 in the control group; p = 0.048) and digestive adverse events in particular (6 vs 29, respectively; p = 0.007). A total of 53 and 40 drug-related problems were identified in the control and multidisciplinary consultation program groups, respectively (p = 0.074).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an multidisciplinary consultation program was not associated with a significant difference in drug adherence (as assessed by the medication possession ratio), which was good before and after implementation. The multidisciplinary consultation program was associated with a lower incidence of adverse events.

The role of pharmacies in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation process: A nationwide survey by Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The aim of this survey, conducted by the Gruppo Italiano per il Trapianto di Midollo Osseo (GITMO), was to evaluate the involvement of pharmacists in the haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) program in Italian adult and paediatric centres.

METHODS

A 63-item online questionnaire was developed and sent to the Italian Transplant Programs on behalf of GITMO.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Overall, 54.7% of the Italian HSCT centres participated in the survey (88.5% adult, 7.7% paediatric, 3.8% mixed), of which 50% were in public hospitals and 50% affiliated with public universities. Just over 80% declared that a pharmacist is involved in the HSCT centre, and 86.5% reported the presence of a documentation system to signal of adverse events, accessible by physicians, nurses and pharmacists in 57.7%. Chemotherapy drugs were centralized in the pharmacy in 98.1% of HSCT centres, while parenteral nutrition was centralized in 55.8%. The use of off-label drugs was authorized by an internal committee and by the regional health authorities in 88.5% of the centres. On univariate analysis, few statistically significant differences were found on response frequencies between public hospitals and university centres or between HSCT centres performing only autologous stem cell transplantation versus other centres performing autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This survey suggests that there is good collaboration between pharmacists and physicians and nurses in Italian HSCT transplantation centres. The enhancement of pharmacists dedicated to HSCT programs could improve some problems, for example, the centralization of parenteral nutrition.

Creating a Blueprint of Well-Being in Oncology: An Approach for Addressing Burnout From ASCO's Clinician Well-Being Taskforce

Optimizing the well-being of the oncology clinician has never been more important. Well-being is a critical priority for the cancer organization because burnout adversely impacts the quality of care, patient satisfaction, the workforce, and overall practice success. To date, 45% of U.S. ASCO member medical oncologists report experiencing burnout symptoms of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. As the COVID-19 pandemic remains widespread with periods of outbreaks, recovery, and response with substantial personal and professional consequences for the clinician, it is imperative that the oncologist, team, and organization gain direct access to resources addressing burnout. In response, the Clinician Well-Being Task Force was created to improve the quality, safety, and value of cancer care by enhancing oncology clinician well-being and practice sustainability. Well-being is an integrative concept that characterizes quality of life and encompasses an individual's work- and personal health-related environmental, organizational, and psychosocial factors. These resources can be useful for the cancer organization to develop a well-being blueprint: a detailed start plan with recognized strategies and interventions targeting all oncology stakeholders to support a culture of community in oncology.