A Systematic Methodology to Analyze the Impact of Hand-Rim Wheelchair Propulsion on the Upper Limb

Wheelchair Axle Position Effect on the Propulsion Performance of Persons With C7 Tetraplegia: A Repeated-Measures Study

Objectives

To assess the changes in speed, stroke frequency, acceleration, and shoulder range of motion (ROM) associated with different wheelchair axle positions in people with chronic C7 tetraplegia.

Methods

This repeated-measures study was conducted at the Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Unit, FLENI Escobar, Argentina. The speed, stroke frequency, acceleration, and shoulder ROM during wheelchair propulsion were measured in nine participants with C7 spinal cord injury (SCI) in four different axle positions (forward and up, forward and down, backward and down, backward and up). Two strokes performed at maximum speed were analyzed on a smooth level vinyl floor in a motion analysis laboratory. Data were analyzed for significant statistical differences using the Friedman test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Results

Our study showed significant differences in the speed with axle position 1 (1.57 m/s) versus 2 (1.55 m/s) and position 2 (1.55 m/s) versus 4 (1.52 m/s). The shoulder ROM showed a significant difference in the sagittal plane in position 2 (59.34 degrees) versus 3 (61.64 degrees), whereas the stroke frequency and the acceleration parameters showed no statistically significant differences with the different rear axle positions.

Conclusions

Our study showed that modifying the rear axle position can improve the propulsion speed and produce changes in the shoulder ROM in the wheelchair propulsion of individuals with C7 SCI.

Influence of wheelchair type on Wheelchair Propulsion Test performance in community-dwelling, adult wheelchair users1

BACKGROUND: The clinimetric properties of the Wheelchair Propulsion Test (WPT) have not been developed thoroughly. OBJECTIVE: To determine inter-rater reliability and reference values for the Wheelchair Propulsion Test (WPT) for active wheelchair users and to compare WPT performance between various types of manual wheelchairs at different paces. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, descriptive study. Participants propelled a manual wheelchair 10 m while time and the number of pushes were recorded. Trials were performed in three different manual wheelchairs (a lightweight wheelchair (LW), an ultralightweight wheelchair (ULW), and the participant’s personal, customized wheelchair) at a comfortable pace and a fast pace. RESULTS: The ICC values ranged from 0.861 to 0.999 for both speed and number of pushes. Comfortable wheelchair propulsion speed ranged from 1.51 (0.31) m/s to 1.65 (0.33) m/s depending on the wheelchair utilized. Across both pace conditions, participants were significantly faster when using their personal wheelchair compared to the ULW (P < 0.001) and LW (P < 0.001). Push frequency was significantly greater during the fast pace condition compared to the comfortable pace condition (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Reference values for the WPT in active wheelchair users have been identified. Participants who utilize their personal wheelchair demonstrate faster wheelchair propulsion speeds complemented by greater push frequencies.

Temporo-spatial parameters, shoulder kinematics and acute tendon changes in four different stroke patterns in men wheelchair users with spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND

Manual wheelchair propulsion causes the shoulder tendon pathologies in wheelchair users with spinal cord injury due to its repetitive nature. Four different wheelchair stroke patterns can cause varying amounts of acute changes in the shoulder tendons.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare acute changes in the supraspinatus and biceps tendons and acromio-humeral distance (AHD) after propulsion between different stroke patterns in individuals with spinal cord injury. Additionally, to associate tendon changes with demographic and biomechanical characteristics.

DESIGN

Prospective and comparative study between four groups.

SETTING

Tertiary rehabilitation hospital.

PATIENTS

Men wheelchair users with spinal cord injury.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were divided into 4 groups according to stroke pattern (arcing, semicirculer (SC), single-loop (SL) and double-loop (DL)), in which they used their wheelchair on a motorized treadmill at a speed of 1 m/s. A sample of 40 people was created, 10 in each group. All participants performed a propulsion test.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Temporo-spatial variables and shoulder kinematics were analyzed. Supraspinatus tendon thickness (SSTT), long head of biceps tendon thickness (LHBTT) and AHD were measured before and after the propulsion test.

RESULTS

SC pattern had lower cadance and larger contact angle. A reduction in SSTT and LHBTT in arcing pattern, LHBTT and AHD in SC pattern and, LHBTT in DL pattern was observed (all P < 0.05). However, SL pattern did not differ significantly in all ultrasonographic measurements (all P > 0.05). Body mass index was associated with a decrease in SSTT. Age and number of daily push-up were associated with a decrease in AHD.

CONCLUSIONS

Less tendon changes after the propulsion in the SL pattern suggested that the supraspinatus and biceps tendons were preserved in this pattern. The SL pattern may be a better choice for men wheelchair users with supraspinatus and biceps tendon pathologies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

BILATERAL INSTRUMENTED WHEEL SYSTEM FOR MEASURING HANDRIM FORCES DURING MANUAL WHEELCHAIR PROPULSION

The purpose of this study was to design and validate a new bilateral instrumented wheel system (IWS) to measure triaxial handrim forces and torques simultaneously during the wheelchair propulsion. The designed and implemented system measures the force applied to the handrims on both sides of a manual wheelchair using 6-axis force/torque sensors. In addition, a user interface receives the measurements from the left and right IWSs. To verify the accuracy of the wheel system, we evaluate force and torque measurements during the static and dynamic tests. The maximum error in static measurements of force and torque are 4.29% and 1.95%, respectively. Likewise, dynamic tests using planar forces and axle torques provide low errors and measurements that are highly correlated with the expected values ([Formula: see text]). The results revealed that the proposed IWS can be used to measure bilateral 3D handrim reaction forces with acceptable accuracy.