Beehive Air Sampling and Sensing Device Operation in Apicultural Applications-Methodological and Technical Aspects

Precision Beekeeping Systems: State of the Art, Pros and Cons, and Their Application as Tools for Advancing the Beekeeping Sector

The present review aims to summarize the more recent scientific literature and updated state of the art on the research effort spent in adapting hardware-software tools to understand the true needs of honeybee colonies as a prerequisite for any sustainable management practice. A SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis was also performed with the aim of identifying the key factors that could support or impair the diffusion of precision beekeeping (PB) systems. Honeybee husbandry, or beekeeping, is starting to approach precision livestock farming (PLF), as has already happened in other animal husbandry sectors. A transition from the current paradigm of rational beekeeping to that of precision beekeeping (PB) is thus expected. However, due to the peculiarities of this species and the related farming practices, the PB technological systems (PB systems) are still undergoing a development process that, to some extent, limits their large-scale practical application. Several physical-chemical (weight, temperature, humidity, sound, gases) and behavioral traits (flight activity, swarming) of the hive are reviewed in light of the evolution of sensors, communication systems, and data management approaches. These advanced sensors are equipped with a microprocessor that records data and sends it to a remote server for processing. In this way, through a Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) system, the beekeeper, using specific applications on a personal computer, tablet, or smartphone, can have all the above-mentioned parameters under remote control. In general, weight, temperature, and humidity are the main hive traits monitored by commercial sensors. Surprisingly, flight activity sensors are rarely available as an option in modular PB systems marketed via the web. The SWOT analysis highlights that PB systems have promising strength points and represent great opportunities for the development of beekeeping; however, they have some weaknesses, represented especially by the high purchasing costs and the low preparedness of the addressed operators, and imply some possible threats for beekeeping in terms of unrealistic perception of the apiary status if they applied to some hives only and a possible adverse impact on the honeybees' colony itself. Even if more research is expected to take place in the next few years, indubitably, the success of commercial PB systems will be measured in terms of return on investment, conditioned especially by the benefits (higher yields, better colonies' health) that the beekeeper will appraise as a consequence of their use.

A matter of the beehive sound: Can honey bees alert the pollution out of their hives?

Honey bees (Apis spp.) are often used as biological indicators of environmental changes. Recently, bees have been explored to monitor air contaminants by listening to the beehive sound. The beehive sound is believed to encode information on bee responses to chemicals outside their hives. Here we conducted an experiment to address this. First, we randomly fed colonies with pure syrup (PS), acetone-laced syrup (AS), or ethyl acetate-laced syrup (ES) in front of the beehives and collect the beehive sound. Based on the audio data, we build machine learning (ML) models to identify the types of syrup. The result shows that ML models achieved over 90% accuracy for identifying syrup types, indicating that the bees inside their hives emitted the sound associated with the chemicals outside their hives. Then, we sequentially fed the colonies in the order of PS, ES, and AS (the first session) and again in the reverse order (the second session), but did not remove the accumulated ES or AS in the alternative feeding experiment. Based on the audio data, the identification accuracy of both ES and AS by the ML model built on the randomly feeding experiment was different, indicating that the accumulated chemical residuals could confuse the ML models. Therefore, the beehive sound-based environmental monitoring should simultaneously consider the responses of bees to the chemicals outside their hives and their responses to those accumulated inside their hives, which may act simultaneously.

A Low-Cost, Low-Power, Multisensory Device and Multivariable Time Series Prediction for Beehive Health Monitoring

We present a custom platform that integrates data from several sensors measuring synchronously different variables of the beehive and wirelessly transmits all measurements to a cloud server. There is a rich literature on beehive monitoring. The choice of our work is not to use ready platforms such as Arduino and Raspberry Pi and to present a low cost and power solution for long term monitoring. We integrate sensors that are not limited to the typical toolbox of beehive monitoring such as gas, vibrations and bee counters. The synchronous sampling of all sensors every 5 min allows us to form a multivariable time series that serves in two ways: (a) it provides immediate alerting in case a measurement exceeds predefined boundaries that are known to characterize a healthy beehive, and (b) based on historical data predict future levels that are correlated with hive's health. Finally, we demonstrate the benefit of using additional regressors in the prediction of the variables of interest. The database, the code and a video of the vibrational activity of two months are made open to the interested readers.