Facilitating Safe FFF 3D Printing: A Prototype Material Case Study

Computational Fluid Dynamics as a Digital Tool for Enhancing Safety Uptake in Advanced Manufacturing Environments Within a Safe-by-Design Strategy

In modern manufacturing environments, pollution management is critical as exposure to harmful substances can cause serious health issues. This study presents a two-stage computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model to estimate the distribution of pollutants in indoor production spaces. In the first stage, the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) method was used to simulate airflow and temperature. In the second stage, the Lagrangian method was applied for particle tracing. The model was applied to a theoretical acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) filament 3D printing process to evaluate the factors affecting the distribution of ultrafine particles (30 nm). Key parameters such as ventilation system effects, the presence of cooling fans and the print bed, and nozzle temperatures were considered. The results show that the highest flow velocities (1.97 × 10-6 m/s to 3.38 m/s) occur near the ventilation system's inlet and outlet, accompanied by regions of high turbulent kinetic energy (0.66 m2/s2). These conditions promote dynamic airflow, facilitating particulate removal by reducing stagnant zones prone to pollutant buildup. The effect of cooling fans and thermal sources was investigated, showing limited contribution on particle removal. These findings emphasize the importance of digital twins for better worker safety and air quality in 3D printing environments.

Fused Filament Fabrication 3D Printing: Quantification of Exposure to Airborne Particles

Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) has been established as a widely practiced Additive Manufacturing technique, using various thermoplastic filaments. Carbon fibre (CF) additives enhance mechanical properties of the materials. The main operational hazard of the FFF technique explored in the literature is the emission of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds. Exposure data regarding novel materials and larger scale operations is, however, still lacking. In this work, a thorough exposure assessment measurement campaign is presented for a workplace applying FFF 3D printing in various setups (four different commercial devices, including a modified commercial printer) and applying various materials (polylactic acid, thermoplastic polyurethane, copolyamide, polyethylene terephthalate glycol) and CF-reinforced thermoplastics (thermoplastic polyurethane, polylactic acid, polyamide). Portable exposure assessment instruments are employed, based on an established methodology, to study the airborne particle exposure potential of each process setup. The results revealed a distinct exposure profile for each process, necessitating a different safety approach per setup. Crucially, high potential for exposure is detected in processes with two printers working simultaneously. An updated engineering control scheme is applied to control exposures for the modified commercial printer. The establishment of a flexible safety system is vital for workplaces that apply FFF 3D printing.