Defining the Enterovirus Diversity Landscape of a Fecal Sample: A Methodological Challenge?

Enteroviruses in Water: Epidemiology, Detection and Inactivation

Enteroviruses are small non-enveloped RNA viruses commonly found in environmental water samples. Worldwide analysis of water provides evidence of the broad distribution of enteroviruses. In addition to their medical importance, they are used as markers of faecal contamination of water. This review focuses on water-borne human enteroviruses and their transmission. Methods for detecting enteroviruses in water are also presented as well as current strategies to control these enteric viruses in water.

Identification of specific and shared epitopes at the extreme N-terminal VP1 of Coxsackievirus A4, A2 and A5 by monoclonal antibodies

Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is caused by a variety of serotypes in species A of the Enterovirus genus, including recently re-emerged Coxsackievirus A2 (CV-A2), CV-A4 and CV-A5. For development of diagnostic reagents, for surveillance, and the development of multivalent vaccines against HFMD, the antigenicity of HFMD-associated enteroviruses warrants investigation. The purified virions of CV-A4 were inoculated into Balb/c mice and hybridomas were obtained secreting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against CV-A4 and cross-reacting with other closely related species A enteroviruses. The mAbs were characterized by ELISA, Western blotting and in vitro neutralizing assays. The majority of mAbs was non-neutralizing, with only 2% of the mAbs neutralizing CV-A4 specifically. Most of mAbs bound to linear VP1 epitopes of CV-A4. Interestingly, four types of mAbs were obtained which bound specifically to CV-A4 or were broadly to CV-A4/-A2, CV-A4/-A5 and CV-A4/-A2/-A5, respectively. Mapping with overlapping or single-amino-acid mutant peptides revealed that the four types of mAbs all bound to the first 15 amino acids at the N-terminus of the VP1. This region of picornaviruses is functionally important as it is involved in uncoating and releasing of viral RNA into the cytosol. The binding footprints of four type mAbs are composed of conserved and variable residues and are different from each other. The newly discovered broadly cross-reactive mAbs reflect the high homology of CV-A4/ CV-A2/CV-A5. The results also demonstrate that it is possible and beneficial to develop the diagnostic reagents to detect rapidly the main pathogens of enteroviruses associated with HFMD cause by CV-A4/CV-A2/CV-A5.

Laboratory diagnosis of nonpolio enteroviruses: A review of the current literature

Infections by nonpolio enteroviruses (EVs) are highly prevalent, particularly among children and neonates, where they may cause substantial morbidity and mortality. Laboratory diagnosis of these viral infections is important in patient prognosis and guidance of clinical management. Although the laboratory diagnosis of nonpolio EVs is mainly based on molecular techniques, classical virus-isolation techniques are still used in reference laboratories. Other techniques, such as antigen detection and serology, are becoming obsolete and rarely used in diagnosis. An important part of diagnosis and surveillance of EV infections is viral typing by VP1 gene sequencing using conventional Sanger technique and more recently, full-genome next-generation sequencing. The latter allows the typing of all EVs, better investigation of EV outbreaks, detection of coinfection, and identification of severity markers in the EV genome.

Evaluation of GeneXpert EV assay for the rapid diagnosis of enteroviral meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

GeneXpert enterovirus Assay is a PCR-based assay for Enterovirus meningitis diagnosis. However, there is currently no research about the performance of GeneXpert enterovirus assay in the diagnosis of enterovirus meningitis. Thus, a systematic review and meta-analysis is significant on the topic.

Methods

Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PubMed were systematically reviewed with retrieval types. Some criteria were used to filter the studies. Only studies published in English, that made a comparison between GeneXpert enterovirus assay and RT-PCR, and could be formulated in a 2*2 table, were included. The quality of the included studies was evaluated by QUADAS-2. The effect of the GeneXpert enterovirus assay was assessed by the Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Likelihood Ratio, Negative Likelihood Ratio, Diagnosis Odds Ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Publication bias and heterogeneity were evaluated by the Deeks' funnel test and Bivariate Box plot respectively.

Results

7 studies were recruited in the analysis. The Pooled Sensitivity was 0.96 [95% CI (0.94–0.97)], Pooled Specificity was 0.99 [95% CI (0.98–0.99)], Positive Likelihood Ratio was 130.46 [95% CI (35.79–475.58)], Negative Likelihood Ratio was 0.04 [95% CI (0.02–0.10)], and Diagnostic Odds Ratio was 3648.23 (95% CI [963.99–13,806.72)]. In SROC Curve, Area Under Curve (AUC) was 0.9980, and Q*= 0.9849. In Deeks' funnel test, the P-value was 0.807 (P > 0.05), indicating no publication bias. The Bivariate Box plot indicated no evident heterogeneity.

Conclusions

The GeneXpert enterovirus assay demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing enterovirus meningitis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12941-022-00517-3.

Enterovirus Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: a Clinical Comparison from a Regional University Hospital in the Netherlands

Enterovirus infections are known to cause a diverse range of illnesses, even in healthy individuals. However, information detailing enterovirus infections and their severity in immunocompromised patients, such as transplant recipients, is limited. We compared enterovirus infections in terms of genotypes, clinical presentation, and severity between transplant and nontransplant patients. A total of 264 patients (38 transplant recipients) with 283 enterovirus infection episodes were identified in our hospital between 2014 and 2018. We explored the following factors associated with enterovirus infections: clinical presentation and diagnosis on discharge, length of hospital stay, symptom persistence, and infection episodes in both children and adults. We observed some differences in genotypes between patients, with enterovirus group C occurring mainly in transplant recipients (P < 0.05). EV-associated gastrointestinal infections were more common in patients with a transplant (children [71%] and adults [46%]), compared to nontransplant patients (P < 0.05). Additionally, nontransplant patients had a higher number of hospital stays (P < 0.05), potentially reflecting more severe disease. However, transplant patients were more likely to have symptom persistence after discharge (P < 0.05). Finally, children and adults with a transplant were more likely to have additional enterovirus infection episodes (P < 0.05). In our cohort, enterovirus infections did not seem to be more severe after transplantation; however, patients tended to present with different clinical symptoms and had genotypes rarely found in nontransplant recipients.

IMPORTANCE Despite the high prevalence of enteroviruses in the community and the increasing demand for transplants from an aging population, knowledge on enteroviruses in solid organ transplant recipients is currently limited. Transplant recipients represent a significant patient population and require additional considerations in patient management, particularly as they have an increased risk of disease severity. Enteroviruses are known to cause significant morbidity, with a diverse range of clinical presentation from over 100 different genotypes. In this study, we aimed to provide a more comprehensive overview of enteroviral infections in transplant recipients, compared to nontransplant patients, and to bridge some gaps in our current knowledge. Identifying potential clinical manifestation patterns can help improve patient management following enterovirus infections.