1
|
Thompson MA, Boccadoro M, Leleu X, Vela-Ojeda J, van Rhee F, Weisel KC, Rifkin RM, Usmani SZ, Hájek R, Cook G, Abonour R, Armour M, Morgan KE, Yeh SP, Costello CL, Berdeja JG, Davies FE, Zonder JA, Lee HC, Omel J, Spencer A, Terpos E, Hungria VTM, Puig N, Fu C, Ferrari RH, Ren K, Stull DM, Chari A. Rates of Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination and Correlation With Survival in Multiple Myeloma Patients. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2023; 23:e171-e181. [PMID: 36641358 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infections are a common reason for hospitalization and death in multiple myeloma (MM). Although pneumococcal vaccination (PV) and influenza vaccination (FV) are recommended for MM patients, data on vaccination status and outcomes are limited in MM. MATERIALS AND METHODS We utilized data from the global, prospective, observational INSIGHT MM study to analyze FV and PV rates and associated outcomes of patients with MM enrolled 2016-2019. RESULTS Of the 4307 patients enrolled, 2543 and 2500 had study-entry data on FV and PV status. Overall vaccination rates were low (FV 39.6%, PV 30.2%) and varied by region. On separate multivariable analyses of overall survival (OS) by Cox model, FV in the prior 2 years and PV in the prior 5 years impacted OS (vs. no vaccination; FV: HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.90; P = .003; PV: HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.42-0.63; P < .0001) when adjusted for age, region, performance status, disease stage, cytogenetics at diagnosis, MM symptoms, disease status, time since diagnosis, and prior transplant. Proportions of deaths due to infections were lower among vaccinated versus non-vaccinated patients (FV: 9.8% vs. 15.3%, P = .142; PV: 9.9% vs. 18.0%, P = .032). Patients with FV had generally lower health resource utilization (HRU) versus patients without FV; patients with PV had higher or similar HRU versus patients without PV. CONCLUSION Vaccination is important in MM and should be encouraged. Vaccination status should be recorded in prospective clinical trials as it may affect survival. This trial was registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS gov as #NCT02761187.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Thompson
- Aurora Cancer Care, Advocate Aurora Research Institute, Advocate Aurora Health, Milwaukee, WI,.
| | | | - Xavier Leleu
- Pôle Régional de Cancérologie, Department of Hematology, CHU La Milétrie-Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Jorge Vela-Ojeda
- Department of Hematology, UMAE Hospital de Especialidades Centro Medico La Raza IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Frits van Rhee
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Katja C Weisel
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Robert M Rifkin
- Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers/US Oncology Research, Denver, CO
| | | | - Roman Hájek
- Department of Hemato-oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Gordon Cook
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Rafat Abonour
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Mira Armour
- Mijelom CRO, Croatian Myeloma Support Association, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Su-Peng Yeh
- China Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, P.R.China
| | | | - Jesus G Berdeja
- Department of Hematology, Tennessee Oncology and Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Jeffrey A Zonder
- Department of Malignant Hematology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute/Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| | - Hans C Lee
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jim Omel
- The Central Nebraska Myeloma Support Group, Grand Island, NE
| | - Andrew Spencer
- Malignant Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Service, Alfred Health Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Evangelos Terpos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Vania T M Hungria
- Department of Hematology, Clinica São Germano and Santa Casa Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Noemi Puig
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (HUSAL), IBSAL, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Chengcheng Fu
- First Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University, Suzhou Jiangsu, P.R.China
| | | | - Kaili Ren
- Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Lexington, MA
| | | | - Ajai Chari
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pozzi S, Bari A, Pecherstorfer M, Vallet S. Management of Adverse Events and Supportive Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4978. [PMID: 34638462 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Multiple myeloma (MM) patients with relapsing and/or refractory (RR) disease are exposed for a prolonged time to multiple drugs, which increase the risk of toxicity. In addition to tumor response, preserving the quality of life represents an important goal for this patient population. Therefore, supportive therapy plays a pivotal role in their treatment by limiting disease- and drug-related complications. The aim of this review is to outline current standards and future strategies to prevent and treat renal insufficiency, anemia, bone disease, and infection, including COVID-19, in RRMM patients. In addition, the incidence and treatment of side effects of novel anti-MM agents will be discussed. Abstract Relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM) patients are a fragile population because of prolonged drug exposure and advanced age. Preserving a good quality of life is of high priority for these patients and the treatment of disease- and treatment-related complications plays a key role in their management. By preventing and limiting MM-induced complications, supportive care improves patients’ outcome. Erythropoietin-stimulating agents and bisphosphonates are well-established supportive strategies, yet novel agents are under investigation, such as anabolic bone agents and activin receptor-like kinase (ALK) inhibitors. The recent dramatic changes in the treatment landscape of MM pose an additional challenge for the routine care of RRMM patients. Multidrug combinations in first and later lines increase the risk for long-lasting toxicities, including adverse cardiovascular and neurological events. Moreover, recently approved first-in-class drugs have unique side-effect profiles, such as ocular toxicity of belantamab mafodotin or gastrointestinal toxicity of selinexor. This review discusses current standards in supportive treatment of RRMM patients, including recommendations in light of the recent SARS-CoV-19 pandemic, and critically looks at the incidence and management of side effects of standard as well as next generation anti-MM agents.
Collapse
|