Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy for Tumor Prevention and Treatment

Biomacromolecular hydrogel scaffolds from microfluidics for cancer therapy: A review

Traditional cancer treatment is confronted with the problem of limited therapeutic effect, tissue defects, and lack of drug screening. Hydrogel scaffolds from biological macromolecules based on microfluidic technology are a promising candidate, which can mimic tumor microenvironments to screen personalized drugs, promote the regeneration of healthy tissues, and deliver drugs for enhanced localized antitumor treatment. This review summarizes the latest research on the composition of biomacromolecular hydrogel scaffolds, the architecture of hydrogel scaffolds from microfluidic technology, and their application in cancer therapy, including anti-tumor drug screening, anti-tumor treatment, and anti-tumor treatment and tissue repair. In addition, the potential breakthroughs of this innovative platform in the clinical transformation of cancer therapy are further discussed. The insights revealed in this review are intended to guide the utilization of microfluidic technology-based biomacromolecular hydrogel scaffolds in cancer therapy.

Development of Self-Adjuvants in mRNA Vaccine and Its Application in Disease Prevention and Treatment

Adjuvants augment the immunogenicity of vaccines when co-administered with messenger RNA (mRNA) antigens. In recent years, nanotechnology and nanoscience have seen significant growth, resulting in the discovery of synthetic small molecule compounds, natural extracts, and nanomaterials with self-adjuvant properties for nano delivery. The materials exhibit robust immune activity and efficiently activate various innate immune signaling pathways. Moreover, they possess a comparatively simple chemical composition in contrast to conventional adjuvants. This significantly streamlines the manufacturing process of vaccine formulations. Therefore, these self-adjuvant materials theoretically improve the reproducibility of adjuvant production and quality control. Herein, this review summarizes the current research and development progress of mRNA adjuvants, with a specific focus on various types of mRNA adjuvants, notably self-adjuvant nanomaterials. It discusses the current research status on a range of diseases and investigates the potential development of mRNA vaccine adjuvants.

Exploring Cancer Immunotherapy and the Promise of Cancer Vaccine

The goal of immunotherapy is to enhance the immune system by managing the immunological-mediated microenvironment, which makes it possible for immune cells to locate and destroy tumour cells at vital nodes. In the tumor microenvironment, immune responses against tumour cells are reduced when these cells take up immune-regulatory mechanisms. An environment that suppresses the immune system is facilitated by immune cells, including regulatory T cells, regulatory B cells, dendritic cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. In a number of cancer types, adoptive immune cells and immune checkpoint modulators have shown impressive anticancer benefits. Tumour growth is facilitated in large part by immune cells found in the tumour microenvironment (TME). Tumour growth may be stimulated or inhibited by these cells. The ability of the immune system to elude detection by cancer cells offers new possibilities for innovative cancer treatment strategies.

Second-generation checkpoint inhibitors and Treg depletion synergize with a mouse cancer vaccine in accordance with tumor microenvironment characterization

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy for cancer treatment, many cancers remain resistant. Tumors deemed "cold" based on lack of T cell infiltration show reduced potential for CPI therapy. Cancer vaccines may overcome the inadequacy of existing T cells by inducing the needed antitumor T cell response to synergize with CPIs and overcome resistance.

METHODS

CT26 and TC1 tumor cells were injected subcutaneously into mice. Mice were treated with combinations of CPIs alone or a cancer vaccine specific to the tumor antigen E7 present in TC1 cells. CPIs for the TC1 model were selected because of immunophenotyping TC1 tumors. Antitumor and protumor immunity, tumor size and survival, sequence and timing of vaccine and CPI administration, and efficacy of treatment in young and aged mice were probed.

RESULTS

While "hot" CT26 tumors are treatable with combinations of second-generation CPIs alone or with anti-TGFβ, "cold" TC1 tumor reduction requires the synergy of a tumor-antigen-specific vaccine in combination with two CPIs, anti-TIGIT and anti-PD-L1, predicted by tumor microenvironment (TME) characterization. The synergistic triple combination delays tumor growth better than any pairwise combination and improves survival in a CD8+T cell-dependent manner. Depletion of CD4+T cells improved the treatment response, and depleting regulatory T cells (Treg) revealed Tregs to be inhibiting the response as also predicted from TME analysis. We found the sequence of CPI and vaccine administration dictates the success of the treatment, and the triple combination administered concurrently induces the highest E7-specific T cell response. Contrary to young mice, in aged mice, the cancer vaccine alone is ineffective, requiring the CPIs to delay tumor growth.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings show how pre-existing or vaccine-mediated de novo T cell responses can both be amplified by and facilitate synergistic CPIs and Treg depletion that together lead to greater survival, and how analysis of the TME can help rationally design combination therapies and precision medicine to enhance clinical response to CPI and cancer vaccine therapy.

Cancer Vaccines in the Immunotherapy Era: Promise and Potential

Therapeutic vaccines are a promising alternative for active immunotherapy for different types of cancers. Therapeutic cancer vaccines aim to prevent immune system responses that are not targeted at the tumors only, but also boost the anti-tumor immunity and promote regression or eradication of the malignancy without, or with minimal, adverse events. Clinical trial data have pushed the development of cancer vaccines forward, and the US Food and Drug Administration authorized the first therapeutic cancer vaccine. In the present review, we discuss the various types of cancer vaccines and different approaches for the development of therapeutic cancer vaccines, along with the current state of knowledge and future prospects. We also discuss how tumor-induced immune suppression limits the effectiveness of therapeutic vaccinations, and strategies to overcome this barrier to design efficacious, long-lasting anti-tumor immune responses in the generation of vaccines.

Immunotherapy: cancer immunotherapy and its combination with nanomaterials and other therapies

Immunotherapy is a new type of tumor treatment after surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and can be used to manage and destroy tumor cells through activating or strengthening the immune response. Immunotherapy has the benefits of a low recurrence rate and high specificity compared to traditional treatment methods. Immunotherapy has developed rapidly in recent years and has become a research hotspot. Currently, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors are the most effective tumor immunotherapies in clinical practice. While tumor immunotherapy brings hope to patients, it also faces some challenges and still requires continuous research and progress. Combination therapy is the future direction of anti-tumor treatment. In this review, the main focus is on an overview of the research progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors, cellular therapies, tumor vaccines, small molecule inhibitors and oncolytic virotherapy in tumor treatment, as well as the combination of immunotherapy with other treatments.

Polyclonal antibody-induced downregulation of HER1/EGFR and HER2 surpasses the effect of combinations of specific registered antibodies

Background

Antitumor therapies targeting HER1/EGFR and HER2, such as monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), have demonstrated a significant clinical benefit, but the emergence of resistance limits long-term efficacy. While secondary HER1 mutations confer tolerance to TKI, compensatory upregulation of HER2 drives resistance to anti-HER1 MAbs, which identifies MAb combinations targeting both receptors as an attractive therapeutic strategy. Nevertheless, toxicity hampers the clinical validation of this approach. Alternatively, cancer vaccines may induce antibodies directed against several antigens with less concern about induced toxicity.

Methods

Polyclonal antibodies (PAbs) targeting HER1 and HER2 were induced in mice or rabbits through immunization. Recognition of different epitopes on targets by PAbs was validated by phage-display technology. Receptor downregulation was evaluated by flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, and Western blot. MTT assays assessed cytotoxicity, while the antitumor effect of PAbs was assayed in nude mice.

Results

PAbs promoted degradation of HER1 and HER2 regarding clinical MAbs or their combinations. As a result, inhibition of cytotoxicity on tumor cell lines was improved, even in the presence of oncogenic mutations in HER1, as well as in cetuximab-insensitive cells. Accordingly, the antitumor effect of vaccination-induced PAbs was observed in lung tumor lines representative of sensitivity or resistance to HER1 targeting therapies.

Conclusions

Immunization against HER1 and HER2 receptors offers an alternative to passive administration of combinations of MAbs, since vaccination-induced PAbs promote the downregulation of both receptors and they have a higher impact on the survival of tumor cells.