The pathway to better primary care for chronic liver disease

A specialized HE testing clinic improves rational decision-making for therapy in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Cognitive complaints in cirrhosis are often attributed to HE with reflexive therapy if specialized tests are not performed. The aim was to determine the utility of a specialized HE clinic for management decisions.

METHODS

Cirrhosis patients with cognitive complaints were referred through a dedicated consult pathway to a specialized clinic and followed for 6 months. This clinic included detailed history, medication review, standardized tests [Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE), Psychometric HE Score, and others], and obstructive sleep apnea screening. Results were communicated with patients and referring providers. A subset was offered repeat testing.

RESULTS

A total of 286 patients were tested between 2012 and 2022. Of the 286 patients, 4 patients who showed a Mini-Mental State Exam <25 were referred to neurology. Thirty-nine percent had normal Psychometric HE Score (higher in younger patients, without prior HE, depression, and lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium), while 172 (61%) patients had cognitive impairment. Of the 172 patients, 51 did not want management change, 84 were started on HE therapy, and 37 were considered impaired due to other causes. In 51 without management change, 32 refused lactulose, while the remaining were counseled regarding lactulose titration. Of the 84 patients with HE-therapy initiation, lactulose was initiated in 56 and rifaximin in 28; most therapies continued over 6 months. The ones who were retested improved their Psychometric HE Score. The 37 with other causes (obstructive sleep apnea, mood disorders, substance use, and mild cognitive impairment) led to specialized referrals. No overt HE was found over 6 months in those without HE-related impairment. The clinic was billed for.

CONCLUSIONS

A specialized HE clinic for patients with cirrhosis and cognitive complaints established through a dedicated consult pathway showed that 39% of referred patients had normal cognitive performance, while the results guided management changes, including for HE and other causes in the remaining patients.

Emergency Department Use by Young Adults With Chronic Illness Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

INTRODUCTION

There was a significant decrease in emergency department encounters during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our large urban emergency department observed decreased encounters and admissions by youths with chronic health conditions. This study aimed to compare the frequency of emergency department encounters for certain young adults before the pandemic and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using medical records of patients ages 20 to 26 years from October 2018 to September 2019 and February 2020 to February 2021. Files set for inclusion were those with a primary diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus, diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, cerebral palsy, sickle cell disease, asthma, and certain psychiatric disorders for potentially preventable health events.

RESULTS

We included 1203 total encounters (853 before the pandemic and 350 during the pandemic), with the total number of subjects included in the study 568 (293 before the pandemic to 239 during the pandemic). During the pandemic, young adults with mental health conditions (53.1%) accounted for most encounters. Encounters requiring hospital admissions increased from 27.4% to 52.5% during the pandemic, primarily among patients with diabetes (41.8% vs 61.1%) and mental health conditions (50% vs 73.3%).

DISCUSSION

The number of young adults with certain chronic health conditions decreased during COVID-19, with encounters for subjects with mental health conditions increasing significantly. The proportion of admissions increased during the pandemic with increases for subjects with mental health disorders and diabetes. The number of frequent users decreased during COVID-19. Future research is needed to understand better the causes for these disparities in young adults with chronic conditions who use the emergency department as a source of care.

Quality standards for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): consensus recommendations from the British Association for the Study of the Liver and British Society of Gastroenterology NAFLD Special Interest Group

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is common, affecting approximately 25% of the general population. The evidence base for the investigation and management of NAFLD is large and growing, but there is currently little practical guidance to support development of services and delivery of care. To address this, we produced a series of evidence-based quality standard recommendations for the management of NAFLD, with the aim of improving patient care. A multidisciplinary group of experts from the British Association for the Study of the Liver and British Society of Gastroenterology NAFLD Special Interest Group produced the recommendations, which cover: management of people with, or at risk of, NAFLD before the gastroenterology or liver clinic; assessment and investigations in secondary care; and management in secondary care. The quality of evidence for each recommendation was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. An anonymous modified Delphi voting process was conducted individually by each member of the group to assess the level of agreement with each statement. Statements were included when agreement was 80% or greater. From the final list of statements, a smaller number of auditable key performance indicators were selected to allow services to benchmark their practice. It is hoped that services will review their practice against our recommendations and key performance indicators and institute service development where needed to improve the care of patients with NAFLD.