The Safety and Efficacy of Roflumilast Cream 0.15% and 0.05% in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2 Proof of Concept Study

Roflumilast Foam, 0.3%, for Psoriasis of the Scalp and Body: The ARRECTOR Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Current topical treatments for scalp psoriasis are limited by formulation, efficacy, and/or safety.

Objective

To assess safety and efficacy of roflumilast foam, 0.3%, in patients with psoriasis of the scalp and body.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a phase 3 double-blinded, vehicle-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted between August 24, 2021, and June 3, 2022, at 49 sites in Canada and the US. Eligible participants were 12 years and older with plaque psoriasis affecting up to 25% of the scalp and body, at least 10% of the scalp, and up to 20% of nonscalp areas, with a minimum Scalp-Investigator Global Assessment (S-IGA) score of 3 (moderate), and minimum Body-IGA (B-IGA) score of 2 (mild). Data analyses were performed from September 9 to December 30, 2022.

Interventions

Once-daily roflumilast foam, 0.3%, or vehicle for 8 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Coprimary end points were S-IGA and B-IGA success (clear [0] or almost clear [1] plus ≥2-grade improvement) at week 8. Secondary end points included S-IGA success at weeks 2 and 4, change in Scalp Itch-Numeric Rating Scale (SI-NRS), and SI-NRS and Worst Itch-NRS (WI-NRS) success (≥4-point improvement in patients with baseline score of ≥4). Safety and tolerability were also assessed.

Results

A total of 432 patients (mean [SD] age, 47.3 [14.8] years; 243 women [56.3%]) were randomized to roflumilast foam (n = 281) or vehicle (n = 151). At week 8, 66.4% of the roflumilast group achieved S-IGA success vs 27.8% of the vehicle group (P < .001); and 45.5% of the roflumilast group achieved B-IGA success compared with 20.1% of the vehicle group (P < .001). Rates for S-IGA success at week 2 and SI-NRS and WI-NRS success at weeks 2, 4, and 8 were significantly higher for roflumilast vs vehicle. Improvements in SI-NRS were greater for the roflumilast vs the vehicle group as early as the first assessment (24 hours after the first application). Both study groups had low rates of adverse events and favorable tolerability profiles.

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial found that roflumilast foam, 0.3%, improved signs and symptoms of psoriasis on the scalp and body, including pruritus, with low rates of adverse events in patients 12 years and older. These results demonstrate the potential of roflumilast foam, 0.3%, as monotherapy for patients with psoriasis of the scalp and body.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05028582.

Efficacy and Safety of Roflumilast Cream in Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of roflumilast cream in treating atopic dermatitis (AD) by analysing data from three randomised controlled trials. The results demonstrated significant improvement in treatment success with roflumilast compared to vehicle creams, with a modest increase in mild adverse events, supporting its potential as an effective and well-tolerated treatment for AD.

Exploring New Horizons In Allergic Contact Dermatitis Treatment: The Role of Emerging Therapies

The resistant and recalcitrant nature of severe allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) makes treatment challenging. With advances in the understanding of the cellular and molecular pathogenesis of this dermatosis, new therapeutic options are emerging. In particular, the use of biologic drugs such as dupilumab and small molecule inhibitors, such as JAK inhibitors have gained momentum given the cross-cutting inhibition of multiple cytokine actions. This article aims to review the current available data on the use of biologic drugs and small molecule inhibitor drugs in the management of ACD. Results suggest that iJAKs, such as abrocitinib, tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and baricitinib; although biologic drugs, such as dupilumab show significant promise in refractory ACD, more long-term clinical trials are needed to confirm their safety and efficacy profile.

Atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease globally. Key features include an eczematous eruption accompanied by intense itch, which can have an enormous negative effect on patients' quality of life, especially in those with moderate-to-severe disease. Atopic dermatitis is part of a spectrum of atopic conditions that can also include several non-cutaneous organs such as respiratory (eg, allergic rhinitis and asthma) and gastrointestinal (eg, food allergy) systems. For decades, long-term disease control and maintenance were particularly challenging given that treatment options were limited to broad topical and systemic immunosuppressive agents. However, better insights into the pathophysiology of this condition over the past decade have led to the development and approval of safe and efficacious novel targeted treatment approaches. The updated pathophysiological understanding and the evolving therapeutic landscape of atopic dermatitis are discussed in this Seminar.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy with Roflumilast Cream 0.15% in Patients Aged ≥6 Years with Atopic Dermatitis: A Phase 3 Open-Label Extension Trial

Background: Safety and efficacy of roflumilast cream 0.15% for atopic dermatitis (AD) were demonstrated in two 4-week phase 3 trials. Objective: Evaluate long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of roflumilast cream 0.15% in AD. Methods: In this open-label extension (OLE) trial (INTEGUMENT-OLE; NCT04804605), patients aged ≥6 years who completed one of the 4-week phase 3 trials applied roflumilast for up to 52 weeks. After 4 weeks of once-daily application, patients who achieved Validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) of clear (0) switched to twice-weekly (BIW) application to normal-appearing flare-prone areas (proactive treatment). Results: Among 657 patients treated, 36.7% reported adverse events, including 4.7% that were treatment related. Application site pain and stinging/burning that caused definite discomfort at any visit were reported for 0.5% and 0.4%-2.1% of patients, respectively. Patients who achieved vIGA-AD 0 and switched to proactive BIW application maintained vIGA-AD 0/1 (almost clear) for a median of 281 days (Kaplan-Meier estimate). Conclusion: Roflumilast cream 0.15% was well tolerated for up to 56 weeks. BIW application to normal-appearing flare-prone sites maintained improvement in AD signs and symptoms, showing that proactive treatment represents an alternative to the current standard practice of reactive treatment.

Neutrophils in Atopic Dermatitis

Neutrophils have a critical role in inflammation. Recent studies have identified their distinctive presence in certain types of atopic dermatitis (AD), yet their exact function remains unclear. This review aims to compile studies elucidating the role of neutrophils in AD pathophysiology. Proteins released by neutrophils, including myeloperoxidase, elastase, and lipocalin, contribute to pruritus progression in AD. Neutrophilic oxidative stress and the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps may further worsen AD. Elevated neutrophil elastase and high-mobility group box 1 protein expression in AD patients' skin exacerbates epidermal barrier defects. Neutrophil-mast cell interactions in allergic inflammation steer the immunological response toward Th2 imbalance and activate the Th17 pathway, particularly in response to allergens or infections linked to AD. Notably, drugs alleviating pruritic symptoms in AD inhibit neutrophilic inflammation. In conclusion, these findings underscore that neutrophils may be therapeutic targets for AD symptoms, emphasizing their inclusion in AD treatment strategies.

[Modern topical drugs-new developments in galenics and pharmacology]

The importance of topically applied pharmaceuticals, especially for the treatment of dermatological diseases, is still essential. Thanks to detailed knowledge of the organisation and function of the physicochemical barrier of the skin, new galenic concepts have increasingly been developed to market maturity in recent years. Colloidal drug carrier systems in particular, but also targeted physicochemical modifications of matrices are used to optimise the cutaneous bioavailability of topically applied drugs. In addition, new molecules are increasingly becoming available for the development of these preparations or drugs known from systemic therapy are being formulated into topicals. Against this background, dermatopharmacology is also developing more and more into a highly specialised science in this area, which is producing innovative concepts for the therapy of special indications. In addition to the classic small-molecule drugs, biotechnological molecules are increasingly finding their way into application, so that a modern age of dermatopharmacology has dawned, which will open up previously unimagined possibilities for topical therapy now and in the coming years.

Topical Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis: What is New and the New Paradigm

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder that requires a complex management strategy, which often involves multiple and diverse topicals and systemic treatment regimens. While topical steroids and more recently calcineurin inhibitors have been the mainstay therapy for mild-to-moderate disease, recent advances in the understanding of AD pathogenesis have led to the development of different new targets, rapidly widening our therapeutic armamentarium. This review summarizes their efficacy and safety data. We also review topical optimization strategies, including the recently published topical volume calculator, to maximize long-term disease control, especially when using multiple agents at the same time.

A comparison of the safety and efficacy of tapinarof and roflumilast topical therapies in the management of mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is an immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease. First-line topical treatments include steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, vitamin D analogs, and anthralin. Recently, novel topical therapeutics like tapinarof and roflumilast have emerged with unique anti-inflammatory mechanisms and promising efficacy profiles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review utilized PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases to identify recent studies on tapinarof and roflumilast. Criteria focused on efficacy, safety profiles, and therapeutic roles in psoriasis treatment.

RESULTS

Four primary literature articles were identified for tapinarof and five for roflumilast. Both drugs demonstrated strong efficacy with minimal adverse events in treating mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis. Tapinarof showed more frequent but mild adverse effects, while roflumilast had less frequent but more severe side effects.

DISCUSSION

Tapinarof and roflumilast offer once-daily dosing and successful treatment in restricted areas, potentially enhancing patient adherence. Cost remains a limiting factor, necessitating future comparative studies to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness between the two drugs.

CONCLUSION

Tapinarof and roflumilast present promising topical treatments for psoriasis, showing efficacy and manageable safety profiles. Further research is crucial to fully elucidate their comparative benefits and drawbacks in clinical practice.

Long-term safety and effectiveness of roflumilast cream 0.3% in adults with chronic plaque psoriasis: A 52-week, phase 2, open-label trial

BACKGROUND

Efficacy and/or safety profiles limit topical psoriasis treatments.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate long-term effects of once-daily roflumilast cream 0.3% in patients with psoriasis.

METHODS

In this open-label phase 2 trial, adult patients (N = 332) with psoriasis who completed the phase 2b parent trial or were newly enrolled applied roflumilast once-daily for 52 weeks. Safety and effectiveness were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 244 patients (73.5%) completed the trial; 13 patients (3.9%) discontinued due to adverse events (AEs) and 3 (0.9%) due to lack of efficacy. Twelve patients (3.6%) reported treatment-related AEs; none were serious. ≥97% of patients had no irritation. No tachyphylaxis was observed with 44.8% of the patients achieving Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Clear or Almost Clear at Week 52.

LIMITATIONS

Intertriginous-IGA and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) were not evaluated in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this long-term trial, once-daily roflumilast cream was well-tolerated and efficacious up to 64 weeks in patients in the earlier trial, suggesting it is suitable for chronic treatment, including the face and intertriginous areas.

Topical Treatments in Atopic Dermatitis: An Expansive Review

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin condition found worldwide. It impacts patient quality of life (QoL) and is thought to arise as an inflammatory response to epidermal barrier dysfunction and hypersensitivity. AD can lead to large out-of-pocket costs and increased healthcare expenses over a lifetime. An analysis of all randomized control trials conducted since 1990 on topical therapies for AD were reviewed, including 207 trials in the final analysis. It was found that an average of 226 patients were enrolled over 2.43 arms. Common topical treatments included corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. The most utilized tools to identify treatment efficacy were the EASI, IGA, SCORAD, and PGA. There was a paucity of data on trials that evaluated efficacy, QoL, and cost of treatment simultaneously. This review highlights the need for comprehensive trials that evaluate multiple aspects of treatment, including financial cost and QoL impact, to ensure each patient has the best treatment modality for the management of their AD.

Topical and Oral Roflumilast in Dermatology: A Narrative Review

Oral roflumilast is a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor approved for the prevention of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic bronchitis. In dermatology, topical roflumilast is authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of plaque psoriasis and mild to moderate seborrheic dermatitis. Several studies have described the off-label use of roflumilast in dermatology, including a randomized controlled trial showing its usefulness in the treatment of psoriasis; case reports and small series have also reported successful outcomes in hidradenitis suppurativa, recurrent oral aphthosis, nummular eczema, lichen planus, and Behçet disease. Roflumilast has a favorable safety profile, similar to that of apremilast, and it is considerably cheaper than new generation drugs and even some conventional immunosuppressants. We review the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topical and oral roflumilast and discuss potential adverse effects and both approved and off-label uses in dermatology. Roflumilast is a promising agent to consider.

[Translated aticle] Topical and Oral Roflumilast in Dermatology: A Narrative Review

Oral roflumilast is a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor approved for the prevention of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic bronchitis. In dermatology, topical roflumilast is authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of plaque psoriasis and mild to moderate seborrheic dermatitis. Several studies have described the off-label use of roflumilast in dermatology, including a randomized controlled trial showing its usefulness in the treatment of psoriasis; case reports and small series have also reported successful outcomes in hidradenitis suppurativa, recurrent oral aphthosis, nummular eczema, lichen planus, and Behçet disease. Roflumilast has a favorable safety profile, similar to that of apremilast, and it is considerably cheaper than new generation drugs and even some conventional immunosuppressants. We review the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topical and oral roflumilast and discuss potential adverse effects and both approved and off-label uses in dermatology. Roflumilast is a promising agent to consider.

Topical Prescription Management

With recent advances in topical therapies for atopic dermatitis (AD), steroid-sparing options like calcineurin inhibitors, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4) inhibitors are becoming mainstays in therapy, underscoring the importance of careful selection and usage of topical corticosteroids (TCSs) to minimize side effects. Alongside the necessity of emollient use, these steroid-sparing alternatives offer rapid itch relief and efficacy in improving disease severity. While TCSs still hold a prominent role in AD management, promising novel topical treatments like tapinarof and live biotherapeutics to modulate the skin microbiome are also discussed. Overall, the recent addition of novel topical therapies offers diverse options for AD management and underscores the importance of topical treatments in the management of AD.

Atopic dermatitis in skin of colour. Part 2: considerations in clinical presentation and treatment options

Recent advances in atopic dermatitis (AD) present the condition as a heterogeneous disease of distinct endotypes across ethnic groups. AD in people with skin of colour may appear psoriasiform, lichenoid, scaly or papular, with a violaceous colour and there is a higher prevalence of post-inflammatory dyspigmentation compared with affected individuals of White ethnicity. These differences in clinical presentation may limit the use of AD assessment tools in people with skin of colour, leading to the potential for misdiagnosis and underestimation of severity, particularly in relation to assessment of erythema. Recent targeted therapies for AD have been studied in multiple ethnic groups; however, ethnicity-based subgroup analysis is often not performed. Further research is required to understand whether treatment responses or safety may differ among ethnic groups.

Anti-inflammatory and biologic drugs for atopic dermatitis: a therapeutic approach in children and adolescents

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a heterogeneous pathogenesis correlated with dysregulation of the immune system and a prevalence of the T2-mediated immune pathway. Recent understanding of the pathogenesis of AD has allowed the development of new drugs targeting different mechanisms and cytokines that have changed the treatment approach. The aim of this review is to update knowledge on the standard of care and recent advancements in the control of skin inflammation. In light of recent guidelines, we report on the clinical efficacy of novel treatments, with special attention to situations where biologics and small molecules are involved.

Challenges and Future Trends in Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis represents a complex and multidimensional interaction that represents potential fields of preventive and therapeutic management. In addition to the treatment armamentarium available for atopic dermatitis, novel drugs targeting significant molecular pathways in atopic dermatitis biologics and small molecules are also being developed given the condition's complex pathophysiology. While most of the patients are expecting better efficacy and long-term control, the response to these drugs would still depend on numerous factors such as complex genotype, diverse environmental triggers and microbiome-derived signals, and, most importantly, dynamic immune responses. This review article highlights the challenges and the recently developed pharmacological agents in atopic dermatitis based on the molecular pathogenesis of this condition, creating a specific therapeutic approach toward a more personalized medicine.

Novel Therapeutic Targets for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that significantly impacts quality of life. The pathogenesis of AD is a complex combination of skin barrier dysfunction, type II immune response, and pruritus. Progress in the understanding of the immunological mechanisms of AD has led to the recognition of multiple novel therapeutic targets. For systemic therapy, new biologic agents that target IL-13, IL-22, IL-33, the IL-23/IL-17 axis, and OX40-OX40L are being developed. Binding of type II cytokines to their receptors activates Janus kinase (JAK) and its downstream signal, namely signal transduction and activator of transcription (STAT). JAK inhibitors block the activation of the JAK-STAT pathway, thereby blocking the signaling pathways mediated by type II cytokines. In addition to oral JAK inhibitors, histamine H4 receptor antagonists are under investigation as small-molecule compounds. For topical therapy, JAK inhibitors, aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulators, and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors are being approved. Microbiome modulation is also being examined for the treatment of AD. This review outlines current and future directions for novel therapies of AD that are currently being investigated in clinical trials, focusing on their mechanisms of action and efficacy. This supports the accumulation of data on advanced treatments for AD in the new era of precision medicine.

Localized Delivery of Bioactives using Structured Liposomal Gels

Liposomes have gained a lot of interest for drug delivery applications, and some of these preparations have been commercialized. These are formulated with biocompatible components and can be used for delivering a wide range of payloads differing in aqueous solubility and molecular weight. Liposome-based delivery approaches are limited mainly by two factors: (a) poor dispersion stability, and (b) pre-mature leakage of payloads. In this review, we have discussed the stabilization of liposomal vesicles by their entrapment in hydrogels. Studies reveal that such hydrogels can maintain the structural integrity of liposomes. Release of liposomes from the hydrogel network can be modulated through careful screening of matrix former and degree of its cross-linking. Accordingly, we have reviewed the approaches of stabilizing liposomal vesicles through entrapment in hydrogels. Application of liposome-embedded hydrogels has been reviewed in context of localized drug delivery. Our discussion is focussed on the delivery of bioactives to the skin. Such an approach appears alluring from the standpoint of minimizing the undesirable distribution of payload(s) the systemic circulation and off-target sites.