Unresolved issues in the epidemiology and diagnosis of bacteremia: an opinion paper

Evaluation of the quickmic system in the rapid diagnosis of Gram-negative bacilli bacteremia

Rapid microbiological diagnosis of the antibiotic susceptibility of Gram-negative bacilli is a priority in clinical microbiology, especially in cases of bacteremia. The rapid advancement of antimicrobial resistance proposes a challenge for empirical antibiotic therapy and shows the need for fast antibiotic susceptibility diagnostics to guide treatments. The QuickMIC System (Gradientech AB, Uppsala, Sweden) is a recently developed rapid diagnostic tool for antibiotic susceptibility testing. Our study evaluates a rapid phenotypic system (QuickMIC) that provides information on the susceptibility of 12 antibiotics against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus spp., Citrobacter spp., and Serratia marcescens. A total of 816 antibiotic/microorganism combinations were tested, resulting in eight discrepancies. The concordance between the antibiotics offered by QuickMIC and reference methods (MicroScan WalkAway plus system, Beckman Coulter; Etest (BioMerieux microdilution system (Bruker); Real-time PCR (GeneXpert, Cepheid); and immunochromatography (Biotech) was 99.02%. Time elapsed to obtain a valid minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was between 2 and 4 h. The QuickMIC system allows for the early adjustment of antibiotic treatment in these infections. Given the existing limitations of currently available rapid methods, its clinical utility is particularly relevant in the management of P. aeruginosa infections and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales. The use of rapid methods can help diversify antibiotic use and reduce carbapenem consumption.

IMPORTANCE

The rapid diagnosis of antibiotic sensitivity in Gram-negative bacilli is of paramount importance in clinical microbiology, particularly in cases of bacteremia. The escalating challenge of antimicrobial resistance underscores the need for expeditious antibiotic susceptibility diagnostics to guide empirical antibiotic therapy effectively. In light of this, we present our study that evaluates the QuickMIC System, a recently developed rapid diagnostic antibiogram. QuickMIC System, offers a novel approach to phenotypic testing, providing information on the activity of 12 antibiotics against key pathogens, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus spp., Citrobacter spp., and Serratia marcescens. Our investigation involved testing a total of 816 antibiotic/microorganism combinations. The study demonstrated an impressive 99.02% concordance between the QuickMIC System and the reference methods, with only eight discrepancies observed. The time to actionable minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranged between 2 and 4 h, highlighting the system's efficiency in providing rapid results.

Diagnostic performance of the time to positivity of blood cultures to distinguish true bacteremia from contaminants based on an automated system

OBJECTIVE.

To determine the diagnostic performance of blood culture positivity times for distinguishing true bacteremia from contaminants in the automated "BACT/ALERT®" system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS.

A cross-sectional, diagnostic test-type study was conducted from a database of blood culture samples processed between January 2016 and August 2021. All blood culture samples from patients with suspected bacteremia were included; blood culture samples were entered into the "BACT/ALERT®" system to differentiate true bacteremia from contaminants.

RESULTS.

We obtained 33,951 blood cultures samples, of which 3875 were positive. Of the total number of positive blood cultures, 75.2% (n=2913) were true bacteremia and 24.8% (n=962) were contaminants. The median time to positivity in blood cultures with true bacteremia was significantly shorter (16.3 hours; IQR: 11.2 - 24.9) than the median time to positivity of blood cultures with contaminants (22.5 hours; IQR: 18.4 - 31.8; p<0.001). The positivity time showed the capacity to differentiate true bacteremia from contaminants, with an AUC-ROC of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.71 - 0.75), with 85% and 63% sensitivity and specificity respectively for the diagnosis of contaminants when the positivity time exceeds 16.5 hours. The use of antibiotics prior to sampling delayed the time to positivity, while having fever before sampling shortened the time to positivity.

CONCLUSIONS.

Our results show good diagnostic performance of blood culture positivity times to differentiate true bacteremia from contaminants using the "BACT/ALERT®" system when the positivity time was longer than 16.5 hours.

Equine blood cultures: Can we do better?

Blood culture is considered the gold standard test for documenting bacteraemia in patients with suspected bacterial sepsis in veterinary and human medicine. However, blood culture often fails to yield bacterial growth even though the clinical picture is strongly suggestive of bacterial sepsis, or contaminating organisms can overgrow the true pathogen, making accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of this life-threatening condition very challenging. Methodology for collecting blood cultures in equine medicine, and even in human hospitals, is not standardised, and many variables can affect the yield and type of microorganisms cultured. Microbiological culture techniques used in the laboratory and specific sample collection techniques, including volume of blood collected, aseptic technique utilised, and the site, timing and frequency of sample collection, all have substantial impact on the accuracy of blood culture results. In addition, patient-specific factors such as husbandry factors, the anatomical site of the primary infection, and changing microflora in different geographic locations, also can impact blood cultures. Thus, blood cultures obtained in practice may not always accurately define the presence or absence of, or specific organisms causing, bacteraemia in horses and foals with suspected sepsis. Erroneous blood culture results can lead to inappropriate antimicrobial use, which can result in poor outcomes for individual patients and contribute to the development of antimicrobial resistance in the patient's microflora and the environmental microcosm. This review summarises current indications and methodology, and specific factors that may be optimised, for equine blood culture, with particular focus on available literature from neonatal foals with suspected bacterial sepsis. To standardise and optimise blood culture techniques in horses and foals, future research in this area should be aimed at determining the optimal volume of blood that should be collected for culture, and the ideal site, timing, and frequency of sample collection.

Models for bacteraemia risk prediction. Clinical implications

Bacteraemia has important consequences for the patient, as it is associated with worse clinical outcomes. On the other hand, unnecessarily obtaining samples for blood cultures increases costs and the workload in the microbiology laboratory. Its diagnosis implies a time delay, but decisions about start antibiotic treatment, discharge, or admits the patient must be taken during the first attention and, therefore, before known the blood cultures results. This manuscript reviews the different strategies based on clinical scores and biomarkers that are useful for predicting bacteraemia and improving initial decision-making.