Past and future of HIV infection. A document based on expert opinion

Prevalence of Doravirine Resistance Mutations in a Large-Scale HIV-1 Transmitted Drug Resistance Survey in Buenos Aires, Argentina

BACKGROUND

Argentina has reported moderate to high levels of transmitted drug resistance in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA), mostly to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). Doravirine (DOR) has a unique resistance profile and retains potent antiviral activity in the presence of the most prevalent NNRTI-associated resistant viruses. Scarce data exist regarding the frequency of DOR resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in Latin America. We describe the prevalence of DOR RAMs in samples from adults PLWHA in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in the context of a survey of transmitted drug resistance (TDR).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was undertaken utilizing samples collected between 2017 and 2021 at two reference HIV clinics. Samples were analyzed for RAMs using the World Health Organization (WHO) mutation list. Mutations to DOR were assessed with the Stanford and Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS) algorithms. Rilpivirine (RPV) RAMs were assessed using the Stanford algorithm. Susceptibility to NNRTIs was evaluated using the HIVdb Program with Stanford and ANRS criteria.

RESULTS

Samples from 1667 PLWHA were analyzed: 81.2% were male, with 52.6% identifying as men who have sex with men. According to the WHO list, the overall TDR was 12.1% (n = 203). The prevalence of RAMs was 10.1% (170/1667) for NNRTIs, 4% (67/1667) for nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), and 1.7% (30/1667) for protease inhibitors (PIs). The most frequent NNRTI mutations were K103N (5.6%), G190A (0.89%), and K103S (0.77%). The prevalence of DOR RAMs was <2%, with the most common being Y188L (0.53%). Rilpivirine RAM prevalence was 6%. Susceptibility to DOR, RPV, efavirenz, and nevirapine as given by the Stanford algorithm was 97.4%, 92%, 91.4%, and 90.4%, respectively. The ANRS criteria yielded susceptibility rates of 98.3%, 93.3%, 92.3%, and 90.8%, respectively. Regarding NRTIs, thymidine analog mutations (including T215 revertants) were the most frequent RAMs. Among PIs, the most prevalent RAMs were M46L (0.47%) and V82A (0.35%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows the persistence of moderate to high levels of resistance to first-generation NNRTIs. Despite this, prevalence was low for DOR. Surveillance of TDR remains critical for recommendations of ART initiation.

Modulation of tenofovir by probenecid: Impact on drug, interleukin-1β, and dopamine concentration in the prefrontal cortex and cerebellum

The blood-brain barrier's limited permeability to tenofovir restricts its ability to clear HIV from the brain. Probenecid acting as an adjuvant increases tenofovir concentrations in plasma and the kidneys thereby enhancing its therapeutic effect. However, the probenecid effect on brain tenofovir concentration and possible adverse effects remains poorly understood. We investigated the effect of probenecid co-administered tenofovir on tenofovir brain concentration, interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and dopamine concentration in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the cerebellum. Ninety-six male BALB/c mice were divided into four groups viz: a control group, Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treated, probenecid treated, and TDF + probenecid treated. We orally administered a single dose of TDF (5 mg/kg), and probenecid (8.3 mg/kg), and sacrificed six mice per group after 1 h, 4 h, and 6 h post-treatment to collect plasma, PFC, and cerebellar tissue. Co-administered tenofovir increased tenofovir concentration, peaking at 6 h with the cerebellum having the highest concentration. This suggests that probenecid enhanced the entry of tenofovir into the brain. Tenofovir alone increased IL-1β concentration at all intervals post-administration, while probenecid alone had no impact on IL-1β concentration. Co-administered tenofovir also increased IL-1β concentration. Probenecid's limited impact on IL-1β concentration following co-administration suggests that its anti-inflammatory properties may require more than 6 h to have an effect. Furthermore, neither tenofovir nor probenecid affected dopamine concentration. In conclusion, probenecid enhances the concentration and retention of tenofovir in the brain, making it a possible pharmacokinetic enhancer. However, its anti-inflammatory effects may require a longer duration to fully manifest.

Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Rural Eastern Cape, South Africa: A Study of Patients' Characteristics in Selected Healthcare Facilities

This study investigated the characteristics and outcomes of drug-resistant tuberculosis patients in selected rural healthcare facilities in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. A retrospective review of clinical records from 456 patients, covering the period from January 2018 to December 2020, revealed a statistically significant relationship between DR-TB types and age groups (Chi-square statistic: 30.74, p-value: 0.015). Younger adults (19-35 years) and middle-aged adults (36-50 years) are more frequently affected by RR-TB and MDR-TB, which are the most prevalent forms of DR-TB. Less common types, including Pre-XDR, XDR, and INH TB, were observed in smaller numbers. The study suggests that DR-TB imposes a heavy burden on the working age population. Gender analysis shows that while the frequency of DR-TB differs between males and females, the percentage distribution of DR-TB types is relatively equal. Both genders are predominantly affected by RR-TB and MDR-TB, which together account for nearly 90% of cases. Pre-XDR, XDR, and INH-resistant TB are much less common, comprising only a small percentage of cases in both males and females. High-risk behaviors such as smoking and drinking are linked to a wider diversity of DR-TB types, while occupations like mining and prison work show higher rates of RR-TB and MDR-TB. In HIV-positive individuals, DR-TB is more common, but the distribution of DR-TB types between HIV-positive and negative groups shows no statistically significant difference. However, HIV-positive individuals have a 20% lower survival rate (65%) compared to HIV-negative patients (85%). Financial stability and comorbidities also significantly influence outcomes, with patients having stable income and fewer high-risk comorbidities experiencing better survival and treatment outcomes. The findings underscore the importance of addressing socioeconomic disparities and strengthening healthcare infrastructure to improve DR-TB treatment outcomes in rural Eastern Cape.

Dentists and dental hygienists' comprehension of HIV infection associated periodontal implications and management

Background

In an era wherein, persuasive evidence continues to witness the association between systemic and periodontal diseases, the absence of scientific data on dental professionals' comprehension concerning the HIV infection and periodontal link is lamentably backward. Thus, the key objective of this research is to ascertain the extent of comprehension possessed by dentists and dental hygienists concerning periodontal implications and their management in HIV patients.

Methods

It is a quantitative cross-sectional survey employing a descriptive approach focusing on a specific cohort of dental professionals. The study setting featured an online platform for the distribution of concealed, closed-ended, structured questionnaire. The data was gathered for four sections: six comprehension statements about periodontal manifestations in HIV patients; fifteen comprehension statements about HIV patients' periodontal management; eight familiarity statements about HIV management; and two educational statements about HIV. The comparisons of comprehension scores were drawn between variables such as specialties, age groups, and genders.

Results

The survey represented 468 dental professionals representing distinct dental specialties, with a mean age of 24.26 ± 7.53 years. The mean comprehension score for all groups of participants is 10.31 ± 9.34 (33.25%). The highest scores were recorded among those aged 31-40 (20.67 ± 8.31), followed by those aged 40+ (19.38 ± 9.39), 20-30 (9.53 ± 8.96), and under 20 (8.92 ± 8.57), at p < 0.001. The female participants (15.06 ± 12.2) exhibited substantially better scores in contrast to the male participants (8.74 ± 7.57). Periodontists (27.77 ± 3.08) comprehended most, then the oral medicine practitioners (25 ± 0). Dental hygiene students (5.52 ± 3.56) and hygienists (7.67 ± 9.72) comprehended the least. The scores for all four domains assessed were disappointingly low: knowledge about HIV-periodontal manifestations (2.81 ± 2.18), knowledge about management of periodontal diseases in HIV patients (3.73 ± 4.7), familiarity with periodontal care in HIV patients (2.87 ± 3.01), and education received about HIV and periodontal diseases (0.91 ± 0.66).

Conclusion

Dental professionals are notably incomprehensive, unfamiliar, and lacking in expertise in the realm of periodontal facets of HIV. The periodontists and oral medicine practitioners showed a substantial amount of comprehension, while the dental hygiene students and dental hygienists presented a conspicuously inadequate level of comprehension. The study outcome could potentially serve as an invaluable instrument for self-assessment by dental professionals and educators. HIV/AIDS ought not to persist as an unspoken taboo or disregarded subject within the dental field, particularly in periodontics, but rather should receive prominence in dental schools and professional development programs.