Primary excision margins, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and completion lymph node dissection in cutaneous melanoma: a clinical practice guideline

Trends in sentinel lymph node evaluation for vulvar melanoma in the United States from 2012 to 2018

OBJECTIVE

To describe trends in type of lymph node assessment for vulvar melanoma over time and factors associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) with vulvar melanoma from 2012 to 2018. Type of lymph node evaluation, demographic and clinical characteristics, and characteristics of the treating institution were abstracted. Chi square and multivariate logistic regression were used to evaluate predictors of SLNB compared to inguinofemoral lymph node dissection (IFLD) and no lymph node evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 1828 patients with vulvar melanoma were identified. Of those, 925 (50.6 %) underwent lymph node evaluation, 357 (38.6 %) with SLNB alone, 97 (10.5 %) with SLNB and IFLD, and 471 (50.9 %) with IFLD alone. Year of diagnosis, age, T stage, insurance status, facility type, and facility volume were significant predictors of use of SLNB in univariate analyses. Age, year of diagnosis, T stage and facility type remained significant in multivariate analysis. SLNB was most often performed for T1 and T2 lesions (31.3 % and 36.2 %, respectively), while only 19.6 % of T3, 1.3 % of T4, and 25.8 % of those with unknown T stage underwent SLNB. Survival outcomes were similar regardless of mode of lymph node assessment, but worse in those who received no assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Current practice in the United States for lymph node evaluation in vulvar melanoma differs from the recommended guidelines for cutaneous melanomas by T stage. Updated guidelines for vulvar melanoma aligned with those for cutaneous melanoma are needed.

Quercetin as a Potential Therapeutic Agent for Malignant Melanoma-A Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions

Neoplastic disorders, particularly malignant carcinomas, are complex systemic diseases characterized by unregulated cellular proliferation, the invasion of adjacent tissues, and potential metastasis to distant bodily sites. Among the diverse spectrum of cancer subtypes, malignant melanoma is a highly aggressive form of cutaneous cancer originating in melanocytes, the pigment-producing cells resident in the skin. This malignancy is distinguished by its rapid and uncontrolled growth, as well as its propensity for metastasis to vital organs, thereby posing significant challenges to therapeutic intervention and prognostication. Early detection of melanoma is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes, as diagnosis at an advanced stage often yields a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Diagnostic modalities for melanoma encompass comprehensive clinical evaluations by dermatologists; radiological imaging techniques such as ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) scans; and excisional biopsies for accurate histopathological assessment. Malignant melanoma is typically treated with surgery to remove the tumor, followed by immunotherapy to enhance the immune response, targeted therapy for tumors with specific genetic mutations, chemotherapy for advanced stages, radiation therapy to manage metastasis, and other adjunct therapies. This review presents the properties and possible adjunct therapeutic effects against malignant melanoma of quercetin found in the literature and explores, based on the observed physicochemical properties and biological activity, its potential development as a topical formulation for cutaneous application. Quercetin is a naturally occurring flavonoid compound abundant in various plant-based food sources, including apples, onions, berries, and citrus fruits, and has exhibited promising antiproliferative, antioxidant, and anticancer properties. Its distinctive biochemical structure enables quercetin to effectively neutralize reactive oxygen species and modulate key carcinogenic pathways, thereby rendering it a potential candidate for therapeutic intervention in managing malignant tumors, including melanoma.

Localization of sentinel lymph nodes using augmented-reality system: a cadaveric feasibility study

PURPOSE

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) helps stage melanoma. Pre-surgical single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) visualizes draining lymph nodes, but intraoperative gamma probe detection only estimates SLN location. This study evaluates augmented reality (AR) for projecting pre-surgical SLN imaging onto patients to aid precise localization and extraction.

METHODS

Molecular sieves (8 mm) incubated in fluorine-18 simulated lymph nodes and were implanted in the head and neck region of cadavers. Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) replaced SPECT/CT due to institutional restriction on cadavers. Virtual PET/MRI renderings were projected using the HoloLens 2 and custom software. Five cadavers underwent surgeries with standard, AR, and AR with head movement compensation methods.

RESULTS

AR achieved a mean surface localization error of 2.5±2.0 mm (range, 0-8 mm) and a depth error of 2.3±1.7 mm (range, 1-7 mm), both within PET voxel resolution. For more challenging level V nodes, the mean surface error slightly increased to 2.9 mm. Compared to manual surface marking, which had an average error of 18.6±13.0 mm (range, 6-62 mm), the AR system significantly reduced errors both in the head-straight and rotated positions (p <.001). Additionally, the AR system reduced the task completion time by 74% (35.1/47.4 s), with an average time of 12.3 s compared to 47.4 s for manual methods.

CONCLUSION

The AR system demonstrated high accuracy and efficiency in SLN localization, integrating head-movement compensation and 3D visualization to improve precision and reduce operating room time.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Donors With Previous Malignancy: When Is It Safe to Proceed With Organ Transplantation?

The growing number of organ donors in the United States, from 14,011 in 2012 to 21,374 in 2022, highlights progress in addressing the critical issue of organ shortages. However, the demand remains high, with 17 patients dying daily while on the waiting list. As of August 2023, over 103,544 individuals are awaiting transplants, predominantly for kidneys (85.7%). To expand the donor pool, the inclusion of elderly donors, including those with a history of malignancies, is increasingly considered. In 2022, 7% of all donors were aged 65 and above, despite the complexities their medical histories may introduce, particularly the risk of donor-transmitted cancer (DTC). This review examines the challenges and potential benefits of using donors with known malignancy histories, balancing the risks of DTC against the urgency for transplants. A critical analysis is presented on current knowledge and the decision-making processes that consider cancer types, stages, and patient survival outcomes. The goal is to identify missed opportunities and improve strategies for safe and effective organ transplantation from this donor demographic.

The benefit of sentinel lymph node biopsy in elderly patients with melanoma: A retrospective analysis of SEER Medicare data (2010-2018)

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node status is critical for melanoma staging and treatment. However, the factors influencing SLNB and its oncologic benefits in elderly patients are unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients aged ≥65 with clinically node-negative melanoma and Breslow depth ≥1 ​mm, using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare database (2010-2018). Multivariable logistic regression assessed SLNB likelihood by demographic and clinical factors, and Cox-proportional hazard models evaluated overall and melanoma-specific mortality (MSM) for SLNB recipients versus non-recipients.

RESULTS

Of 13,160 melanoma patients, 62.29 ​% underwent SLNB. SLNB was linked to reduced all-cause mortality (HR: 0.65 [95%CI 0.61-0.70]) and MSM (HR: 0.76 [95%CI 0.67-0.85]). Older age, non-White race, male sex, and unmarried status was associated with decreased SLNB likelihood, while cardiopulmonary, neurologic, and secondary cancer comorbidities were associated with increased SLNB likelihood.

CONCLUSIONS

Though less frequently performed, SLNB is associated with lower mortality in elderly melanoma patients. Advanced age alone should not contraindicate SLNB.

Comparison of leg volume ratio between inguinal lymphadenectomy and inguino-pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with skin cancer of the lower extremity

BACKGROUND

The timing of intervention to treat lymphedema differs among facilities. Understanding differences in the prevalence and severity of lymphedema following different surgical procedures for lymphadenectomy could promote early intervention to treat lymphedema. There is currently little evidence to support the notion that inguino-pelvic lymphadenectomy is associated with greater morbidity than inguinal lymphadenectomy, although it is believed that the difference in the extent of surgery results in a difference in the severity of lymphedema. In this study, we compared volume percentage change between inguinal lymphadenectomy and inguino-pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with skin cancer of the lower extremity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 29 patients with skin cancer of a lower extremity who underwent lymphadenectomy were classified into an inguinal lymphadenectomy group and an inguino-pelvic lymphadenectomy group. The increase in the volume of the affected side compared with that of the unaffected side in the whole lower extremity, thigh, and lower leg was calculated on volume-rendered computed tomography images.

RESULTS

The mean volume percentage increase in the inguinal lymphadenectomy group and the inguino-pelvic lymphadenectomy group was, respectively, 6.72% and 11.18% in the whole lower extremity and 7.30% and 2.55% in the lower leg, showing no statistically significant differences. In contrast, the mean volume percentage increase in the respective groups was 7.03% and 19.78% in the thigh, showing a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0275 < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study indicate that the leg volume of the whole lower extremity may not have worse outcomes in inguino-pelvic lymphadenectomy compared with inguinal lymphadenectomy.

Steerable DROP-IN radioguidance during minimal-invasive non-robotic cervical and endometrial sentinel lymph node surgery

PURPOSE

The recently introduced tethered DROP-IN gamma probe has revolutionized the way robotic radioguided surgery is performed, fully exploiting the nature of steerable robotic instruments. Given this success, the current first-in-human study investigates if the DROP-IN can also provide benefit in combination with steerable non-robotic instruments during conventional laparoscopic surgery, showing equivalence or even benefit over a traditional rigid gamma probe.

METHODS

The evaluation was performed in ten patients during laparoscopic cervical (n = 4) and endometrial (n = 6) cancer sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedures. Surgical guidance was provided using the hybrid, or bi-modal, SLN tracer ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid. SLN detection was compared between the traditional rigid laparoscopic gamma probe, the combination of a DROP-IN gamma probe and a steerable laparoscopic instrument (LaproFlex), and fluorescence imaging.

RESULTS

The gynecologists experienced an enlarged freedom of movement when using the DROP-IN + LaproFlex combination compared to the rigid laparoscopic probe, making it possible to better isolate the SLN signal from background signals. This did not translate into a change in the SLN find rate yet. In both cervical and endometrial cancer combined, the rigid probe and DROP-IN + LaproFlex combination provided an equivalent detection rate of 96%, while fluorescence provided 85%.

CONCLUSION

We have successfully demonstrated the in-human use of steerable DROP-IN radioguidance during laparoscopic cervical and endometrial cancer SLN procedures, expanding the utility beyond robotic procedures. Indicating an improved surgical experience, these findings encourage further investigation and consideration on a path towards routine clinical practice and improved patient outcome.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

HCB/2021/0777 and NCT04492995; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04492995.

The Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Underpinning Clinical Practice Guidelines Focused on the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Cross-Sectional Analysis

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) inform evidence-based decision-making in the clinical setting; however, systematic reviews (SRs) that inform these CPGs may vary in terms of reporting and methodological quality, which affects confidence in summary effect estimates.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to appraise the methodological and reporting quality of the SRs used in CPGs for cutaneous melanoma and evaluate differences in these outcomes between Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis by searching PubMed for cutaneous melanoma guidelines published between January 1, 2015, and May 21, 2021. Next, we extracted SRs composing these guidelines and appraised their reporting and methodological rigor using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) checklists. Lastly, we compared these outcomes between Cochrane and non-Cochrane SRs. All screening and data extraction occurred in a masked, duplicate fashion.

RESULTS

Of the SRs appraised, the mean completion rate was 66.5% (SD 12.29%) for the PRISMA checklist and 44.5% (SD 21.05%) for AMSTAR. The majority of SRs (19/50, 53%) were of critically low methodological quality, with no SRs being appraised as high quality. There was a statistically significant association (P<.001) between AMSTAR and PRISMA checklists. Cochrane SRs had higher PRISMA mean completion rates and higher methodological quality than non-Cochrane SRs.

CONCLUSIONS

SRs supporting CPGs focused on the management of cutaneous melanoma vary in reporting and methodological quality, with the majority of SRs being of low quality. Increasing adherence to PRISMA and AMSTAR checklists will likely increase the quality of SRs, thereby increasing the level of evidence supporting cutaneous melanoma CPGs.

Mucosal Malignant Melanoma of Head and Neck: A Case Series from a Single Institute and Review of Literature Abstract

Malignant melanoma is an aggressive malignancy of melanocytes which is usually found on sun exposed areas of the body. A rare variant of this disease with no etiological association is the mucosal malignant melanoma found on all mucosal surfaces of the body including the oral cavity, respiratory mucosa and anorectal region. In the head and neck region, this disease is almost always diagnosed at an advanced stage and requires a very high index of suspicion for diagnosis. It is more commonly found in females than males.Indians are more prone to this disease as compared to Caucasians.Due to the obscure location within the oral and nasal cavity, it is clinically found at an advanced stage and requires surgical resection with adequate margins for complete eradication. This may be achieved either endoscopically in the nasal cavity or with wide local resection in the oral cavity. this in certain cases may not be feasible due to vicinity of vital structures. In such cases, adjuvant radiotherapy helps in the local control of disease. Histopathological evaluation of the specimen helps to determine aggressive biology of tumor with factors such as presence of ulceration, nodular morphology and perineural invasion being high risk features for development of local and regional recurrence.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-04001-y.

Association of clinical manifestations of secondary lymphedema and lymph node dissection sites in the lower extremities of patients with melanoma

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema is a chronic, debilitating disease that often requires life-long management. Predicting clinical manifestations and prognosis is crucial in clinical practice because the treatment of lymphedema should be individualized for best clinical outcome. The aim of this study is to explore the location and severity of lymphedema secondary to inguinal and/or iliac lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with melanoma.

METHODS

Patients with melanoma who received LND at a single tertiary medical center between 1 January 2010 and 31 September 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient who received inguinal LND only were designate as the inguinal group while those who received both ilioinguinal LND were included in the ilioinguinal group. Volumetric measurement was used to objectify the severity and location of lymphedema. Clinical data was acquired for 12-15 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 81 patients, 43 (53%) had developed lymphedema in the lower extremities at an average of 33 days after the surgery. Initially, patients manifested with medial thigh lymphedema in the inguinal group while patients were presented with whole leg lymphedema in the ilioinguinal group. Lower leg volume of the ilioinguinal group was significantly higher than the inguinal group. After more than 12 months of lymphedema treatment, upper leg volume was higher in the ilioinguinal group than the inguinal group (12.7% vs 5.4%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Lymphedema developed in early post-op period. The ilioinguinal group presented with a larger volume of lymphedema in the distal area of the legs. Even after sufficient treatment, predominant lymphedema remained in the proximal leg for the ilioinguinal group. Patients with both inguinal and iliac LND were associated with more severe lymphedema. Based on the dissection sites, the clinical manifestations and prognosis of leg lymphedema can vary widely. Thus, clinicians should consider the dissection site when approaching melanoma patients with lymphedema.

Invasive Cutaneous Melanoma: Evaluating the Prognostic Significance of Some Parameters Associated with Lymph Node Metastases

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to assess the clinical-pathological profile of patients with invasive cutaneous melanomas and to identify the parameters with a prognostic role in the lymph nodal spread of this malignant tumor. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective study on patients with invasive cutaneous melanomas who underwent surgery in the "Pius Brînzeu" County Clinical Emergency Hospital from Timișoara, Romania, and were evaluated for the status of loco-regional lymph nodes. We selected and analyzed some parameters searching for their relationship with lymph node metastases. Results: We identified 79 patients with invasive cutaneous melanomas (29 men and 50 women, mean age 59.36 years). A percentage of 58.3% of melanomas had Breslow tumor thickness >2 mm; 69.6% of melanomas showed a Clark level IV-V. Tumor ulceration was present in 59.5% of melanomas. A mitotic rate of ≥5 mitoses/mm² was observed in 48.1% of melanomas. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), non-brisk, were present in 59.5% of cases and 22.8% of patients had satellite/in-transit metastasis (SINTM). Tumor regression was identified in 44.3% of cases. Lymph nodes metastases were found in 43.1% of patients. Statistical analysis showed that lymph node metastases were more frequent in melanomas with Breslow thickness >2 mm (p = 0.0002), high Clark level (p = 0.0026), mitotic rate >5 mitoses/mm² (p = 0.0044), ulceration (p = 0.0107), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.0182), SINTM (p = 0.0302), and non-brisk TILs (p = 0.0302). Conclusions: The Breslow thickness >2 mm, high Clark level, high mitotic rate and ulceration are the most important prognostic factors for lymph nodal spread in cutaneous melanomas. However, some melanomas without these clinical-pathological features can have an unexpected, aggressive evolution, which entails the necessity of close and prolonged clinical follow-up of patients, including those with lesions considered without risk.

Photography as the Sole Means of Proof: Medical Liability in Dermatology

Malignant melanoma is a cutaneous malignancy resulting from the uncontrolled proliferation of melanocytes and poses a challenge diagnostically because neoplastic lesions can mimic benign lesions, which are much more common in the population. Doctors, when they suspect the presence of melanoma, arrange for its removal and the performance of a histological examination to ascertain its diagnosis; in cases where the dermatoscopic examination is indicative of benignity, however, after the lesion is removed, histological examination is not always performed, a very dangerous occurrence and a harbinger of further medico-legal problems. The authors present a court litigation case of an "alleged" failure to diagnose malignant melanoma in a patient who died of brain metastases from melanoma in the absence of a certain location of the primary tumor: the physician who had removed a benign lesion a few months earlier was sued, and only thanks to the presence of photographic documentation was the health care provider able to prove his extraneousness. The aim of this paper is to formulate a proposal for a dermatological protocol to be followed in cases of excisions of benign skin lesions with a twofold purpose: on the one hand, to be able to prove, in a judicial context, the right action on the part of the sanitarians; on the other hand, to avoid the rise of so-called "defensive medicine".

Current Controversies in Melanoma Treatment

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After reading this article and viewing the videos, the participant should be able to: 1. Discuss margins for in situ and invasive disease and describe reconstructive options for wide excision defects, including the keystone flap. 2. Describe a digit-sparing alternative for subungual melanoma. 3. Calculate personalized risk estimates for sentinel node biopsy using predictive nomograms. 4. Describe the indications for lymphadenectomy and describe a technique intended to reduce the risk of lymphedema following lymphadenectomy. 5. Offer options for in-transit melanoma management.

SUMMARY

Melanoma management continues to evolve, and plastic surgeons need to stay at the forefront of advances and controversies. Appropriate margins for in situ and invasive disease require consideration of the trials on which they are based. A workhorse reconstruction option for wide excision defects, particularly in extremities, is the keystone flap. There are alternative surgical approaches to subungual tumors besides amputation. It is now possible to personalize a risk estimate for sentinel node positivity beyond what is available for groups of patients with a given stage of disease. Sentinel node biopsy can be made more accurate and less morbid with novel adjuncts. Positive sentinel node biopsies are now rarely managed with completion lymphadenectomy. Should a patient require lymphadenectomy, immediate lymphatic reconstruction may mitigate the lymphedema risk. Finally, there are minimally invasive modalities for effective control of in-transit recurrences.

The Evolution of the Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma

The growing repertoire of approved immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy has revolutionized the adjuvant treatment of melanoma. While the treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma remains wide local excision (WLE), the management of regional lymph nodes continues to evolve in light of practice-changing clinical trials and dramatically improved adjuvant therapy. With large multicenter studies reporting no benefit in overall survival for completion lymph node dissection (CLND) after a positive sentinel node biopsy (SLNB), controversy remains regarding patient selection and clinical decision-making. This review explores the evolution of the SLNB in cutaneous melanoma in the context of a rapidly changing adjuvant treatment landscape, summarizing the key clinical trials which shaped current practice guidelines.

Multicenter Adoption and Outcomes of Nodal Observation for Patients with Melanoma and Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases

BACKGROUND

Following publication of the MSLT-II trial showing no survival benefit of completion lymphadenectomy (CLND) in patients with melanoma sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases, it is expected that practice patterns have changed. The purpose of this study is to understand real-world practices and outcomes after publication of this landmark trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with truncal/extremity melanoma SLN metastases diagnosed between 2013 and 2019 at four academic cancer centers were included in this retrospective cohort study. Descriptive statistics, Cox proportional hazards model, and multivariable regression were used to characterize the cohort and identify predictors of CLND, harboring non-SLN (NSLN) metastases, and survival.

RESULTS

Results of 1176 patients undergoing SLN biopsy, 183 had SLN metastases. The number of patients who underwent CLND before versus after trial publication was 75.7.% versus 20.5% (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.09-0.28). Of those undergoing nodal observation (NO), 92% had a first nodal-basin ultrasound, while 63% of patients had a fourth. In exploratory multivariable analyses, age ≥ 50 years was associated with lower rate of CLND (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.92) and larger SLN deposit (> 1.0 mm) with increased rate of CLND (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.17-3.00) in the complete cohort. Extracapsular extension was associated with increased risk of NSLN metastases (HR 12.43, 95% CI 2.48-62.31). Adjusted survival analysis demonstrated no difference in recurrence or mortality between patients treated with CLND versus NO at median 2.2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Nodal observation was rapidly adopted into practice in patients with melanoma SLN metastases at four centers in Canada. Younger age and higher nodal burden were associated with increased use of CLND after trial publication. Ultrasound (US) surveillance decreased with time from SLNB. In our study, CLND was not associated with a decreased risk of recurrence or mortality.

Clinical Practice Guidelines on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Quality Appraisal Using the AGREE II Instrument

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure that is standard of care for the evaluation of clinically negative regional lymph nodes in patients with cutaneous melanoma. As the presence of metastases dictates patient prognosis and determines the need for further regional disease control or adjuvant therapy, SLNB is invaluable to clinical decision-making in patients presenting with melanoma. However, the indications for SLNB, specifically among patients with thin (<1 mm) or thick (>4 mm) melanomas, remain unclear. A number of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been developed outlining recommendations for the role of lymph node biopsy in the management of melanoma. However, to date, their quality has not been critically appraised. Our objective was to systematically evaluate all available CPGs on this topic using the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. Four total guidelines met the inclusion criteria and underwent appraisal. Only one CPG achieved a "high" quality rating, indicating scores of >60% in at least five of the six AGREE II domains. Across all CPGs, the lowest scoring domains were "Applicability" and "Stakeholder involvement," which had average scores of 41.2% and 48.3%, respectively. Based on the AGREE II instrument, the quality of existing CPGs for the indications of SLNB for melanoma is low. Future guidelines should be pilot tested to evaluate barriers to application and should utilize multidisciplinary guideline development teams that include patients and key stakeholders in addition to clinical experts from all relevant disciplines.

Predictors of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Thin Melanoma: An International Multi-institutional Collaboration

BACKGROUND

Consideration of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is recommended for patients with T1b melanomas and T1a melanomas with high-risk features; however, the proportion of patients with actionable results is low. We aimed to identify factors predicting SLNB positivity in T1 melanomas by examining a multi-institutional international population.

METHODS

Data were extracted on patients with T1 cutaneous melanoma who underwent SLNB between 2005 and 2018 at five tertiary centers in Europe and Canada. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of SLNB positivity.

RESULTS

Overall, 676 patients were analyzed. Most patients had one or more high-risk features: Breslow thickness 0.8-1 mm in 78.1% of patients, ulceration in 8.3%, mitotic rate > 1/mm² in 42.5%, Clark's level ≥ 4 in 34.3%, lymphovascular invasion in 1.4%, nodular histology in 2.9%, and absence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in 14.4%. Fifty-three patients (7.8%) had a positive SLNB. Breslow thickness and mitotic rate independently predicted SLNB positivity. The odds of positive SLNB increased by 50% for each 0.1 mm increase in thickness past 0.7 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.13) and by 22% for each mitosis per mm² (95% CI 1.06-1.41). Patients who had one excised node (vs. two or more) were three times less likely to have a positive SLNB (3.6% vs. 9.6%; odds ratio 2.9 [1.3-7.7]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our international multi-institutional data confirm that Breslow thickness and mitotic rate independently predict SLNB positivity in patients with T1 melanoma. Even within this highly selected population, the number needed to diagnose is 13:1 (7.8%), indicating that more work is required to identify additional predictors of sentinel node positivity.

Principles of Surgery in Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma

Surgical management of head and neck melanoma starts from the primary biopsy of the cutaneous site by a narrow excision with a 1 to 3 mm margins. The margin should include the whole breadth and sufficient depth of the lesion. The key is not to transect the lesion. With the advent of molecular testing, gene expression profiling, and immunotherapies, the surgical management of advanced melanoma has changed. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is an essential armamentarium for T2a and higher staging/greater than 1 mm thick and advance stage disease. Molecular pathogenesis and cancer immunology are recognized in the recent treatment protocols along with surgery in advanced stages of melanoma.

Population-based assessment of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for melanoma plays a central role in determining prognosis and guiding treatment and surveillance strategies. Despite widely published guidelines for SLNB, variation exists in its use. We aimed to determine the frequency of and predictive factors for SLNB in patients with clinically node-negative melanoma in British Columbia.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients with clinically node-negative melanoma diagnosed between January 2015 and December 2017. Patients included had a Breslow depth greater than 0.75 mm or a Breslow depth less than or equal to 0.75 mm with ulceration, or a mitotic rate greater than or equal to 1/mm2. SLNB was considered to be indicated for clinical stages IB to IIC (American Joint Committee on Cancer's AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, seventh edition).

RESULTS

A total of 759 patients were included. SLNB was performed in 54.8% (363/662) of patients when indicated. SLNB was more likely to be performed for tumours with a Breslow depth greater than 1.0 mm or a mitotic rate greater than or equal to 1/mm2. SLNB was less likely to be performed in patients older than 75 years and with a nonextremity tumour location. Compliance with SLNB guidelines decreased distant recurrence but did not significantly affect regional recurrence, nor did it have a significant impact on overall survival among patients aged 75 years and younger.

CONCLUSION

SLNB is being underutilized in British Columbia. These results are concerning and highly relevant given the rapidly evolving field of adjuvant systemic therapy for high-risk patients and the increased proportion of patients who should be considered for SLNB on the basis of the eighth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and current guidelines. Efforts should be made to increase the use of SLNB in appropriate patients.

Impact of Wide Local Excision on Melanoma Patient Survival: A Population-Based Study

Introduction

Promoting standardization and quality assurance (QA) in oncology on the strength of real-world data is essential to ensure better patient outcomes. Wide excision after primary tumor biopsy is a fundamental step in the therapeutic pathway for cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM). The aim of this population-based cohort study is to assess adherence to wide local excision in a cohort of patients diagnosed with CMM and the impact of this recommended procedure on overall and disease-specific survival.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective cohort study concerns CMM patients diagnosed in the Veneto region (north-east Italy) in 2017, included in the high-resolution Veneto Cancer Registry, and followed up through linkage with the regional mortality registry up until February 29th, 2020. Using population-level real-world data, linking patient-level cancer registry data with administrative records of clinical procedures may shed light on the real-world treatment of CMM patients in accordance with current guidelines. After excluding TNM stage IV patients, a Cox regression analysis was performed to test whether the completion of a wide local excision was associated with a difference in melanoma-specific and overall survival, after adjusting for other covariates.

Results

No wide excision after the initial biopsy was performed in 9.7% of cases in our cohort of 1,305 patients. After adjusting for other clinical prognostic characteristics, Cox regression revealed that failure to perform a wide local excision raised the hazard ratio of death in terms of overall survival (HR = 4.80, 95% CI: 2.05-11.22, p < 0.001) and melanoma-specific survival (HR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.04-7.76, p = 0.042).

Conclusion

By combining clinical and administrative data, this study on real-world clinical practice showed that almost one in ten CMM patients did not undergo wide local excision surgery. Monitoring how diagnostic-therapeutic protocols are actually implemented in the real world may contribute significantly to promoting quality improvements in the management of oncological patients.

Appraisal of International Guidelines for Cutaneous Melanoma Management using the AGREE II assessment tool

BACKGROUND

The evidence base behind new melanoma treatments is rapidly accumulating. This is not necessarily reflected in current guidance. A recent UK-based expert consensus statement, published in JPRAS, has called for updates to the widely accepted 2015 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline for melanoma (NG14). We aimed to compare the quality of NG14 to all other melanoma guidelines published since.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Medline, and online clinical practice guideline databases to identify melanoma guidelines published between 29th July 2015 and 23rd August 2021 providing recommendations for adjuvant treatment, radiotherapy, surgical management, or follow-up care. Three authors independently assessed the quality of identified guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument II (AGREE II) assessment tool, which measures six domains of guideline development. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine guidelines were included and appraised with excellent concordance (Kendall's W for overall guideline score 0.88, p<0.001). Overall, melanoma guidelines scored highly in the domains of 'Scope and purpose' and 'Clarity of presentation', but poorly in the 'Applicability' domain. The NICE guideline on melanoma (NG14) achieved the best overall scores.

CONCLUSION

Melanoma treatment has advanced since NG14 was published, however, the NICE melanoma guideline is of higher quality than more recent alternatives. The planned update of NG14 in 2022 is in demand.

Transcriptomic Profiling Revealed Plexin A2 Downregulation With Migration and Invasion Alteration in Dacarbazine-Treated Primary Melanoma Cells

Melanoma is highly heterogeneous type of malignant neoplasm that is responsible for the majority of deaths among other types of skin cancer. In the present study, we screened a list of differentially expressed genes in two primary, drug-naïve melanoma cell lines derived from patients with melanoma following treatment of the cells with the chemotherapeutic agent dacarbazine. The aim was to determine the transcriptomic profiles and associated alterations in the cell phenotype. We found the vascular endothelial growth factor A/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B and focal adhesion signaling pathways to be top altered after dacarbazine treatment. In addition, we observed the expression levels of genes associated with tumor dissemination, integrin β8 and matrix metalloproteinase-1, to be diminished in both cell lines studied, the results of which were confirmed by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. By contrast, plexin A2 expression was found to be upregulated in K2303 cells, where reduced migration and invasion were also observed, following dacarbazine treatment. Plexin A2 downregulation was associated with the promotion of migrative and invasive capacities in B0404 melanoma cells. Since plexin A2 is semaphorin co-receptor that is involved in focal adhesion and cell migration regulation, the present study suggested that plexin A2 may be implicated in the dacarbazine-mediated phenotypic shift of melanoma cells. We propose that the signature of cancer cell invasiveness can be revealed by using a combination of transcriptomic and functional approaches, which should be applied in the development of personalized therapeutic strategies for each patient with melanoma.

Head and neck melanoma: outcome and predictors in a population-based cohort study

Background

To evaluate predictive clinico-pathological characteristics on outcome in head and neck melanoma (HNM) in a population-based study with particular emphasis on the prognostic effect of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and distinct tumor localisations.

Methods

Here we primarily describe a retrospective multicenter population-based cohort study with 402 patients having undergone resection with curative intent of HNM between 2010 and 2017. SLNB was used in the diagnosis of 79 HNM patients. Outcome was analyzed, focusing on SLNB, CCI as well as tumor localisation. Overall survival (OAS) und recurrence free survival (RFS) was examined by uni- and multivariate analysis.

Results

Histopathologically verified lymph node metastasis according to SLNB was associated with impaired RFS in HNM patients (p = 0.004). Especially in higher tumor stages, the sole implementation of SLNB improved survival significantly in the present cohort (p = 0.042). With most of the HNM being located in the face, melanoma of the scalp and neck could be linked to deteriorated patient’s outcome in uni- as well as multivariate analysis (p = 0.021, p = 0.004).

Conclusions

SLNB is a useful tool in predicting development of distant metastasis after HNM resection with curative intent. Especially in higher tumor stages, performing a SLNB ameliorated survival of HNM patients. Additionally, CCI as well as a distinct tumor localisations in HNM were identified as important risk factors in our population-based cohort study.

Melanoma In Situ: A Critical Review and Re-Evaluation of Current Excision Margin Recommendations

Most international clinical guidelines recommend 5-10 mm clinical margins for excision of melanoma in situ (MIS). While the evidence supporting this is weak, these guidelines are generally consistent. However, as a result of the high incidence of subclinical extension of MIS, especially of the lentigo maligna (LM) subtype, wider margins will often be needed to achieve complete histologic clearance. In this review, we assessed all available contemporary evidence on clearance margins for MIS. No randomized trials were identified and the 31 non-randomized studies were largely retrospective reviews of single-surgeon or single-institution experiences using Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for LM or staged excision (SE) for treatment of MIS on the head/neck and/or LM specifically. The available data challenge the adequacy of current international guidelines as they consistently demonstrate the need for clinical margins > 5 mm and often > 10 mm. For LM, any MIS on the head/neck, and/or ≥ 3 cm in diameter, all may require wider clinical margins because of the higher likelihood of subclinical spread. Histologic clearance should be confirmed prior to undertaking complex reconstruction. However, it is not clear whether wider margins are necessary for all MIS subtypes. Indeed, it seems that this is unlikely to be the case. Until optimal surgical margins can be better defined in a randomized trial setting, ideally controlling for MIS subtype and including correlation with histologic excision margins, techniques such as preliminary border mapping of large, ill-defined lesions and, most importantly, sound clinical judgement will be needed when planning surgical clearance margins for the treatment of MIS.

Evaluation of the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines on melanoma using the RIGHT checklist

BACKGROUND

The International Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) instrument was launched in 2016 to improve the reporting of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). We aimed to systematically evaluate the reporting quality of CPGs on melanoma using RIGHT.

METHODS

We systematically searched electronic databases, guideline databases and medical society websites until November 2020 to identify guidelines for melanoma published since 2018. The reporting quality of included guidelines was assessed by calculating the percentages of the 35 items of the RIGHT checklist that were appropriately reported. We stratified the results by selected characteristics to describe the correlation of these factors with reporting quality.

RESULTS

A total of 20 guidelines were identified and analyzed. The mean reporting rate was greater than 50% in five of the seven domains of the RIGHT checklist; the remaining two domains (Other information, Review and quality assurance) both had a mean reporting rate of 35.0%. The mean overall reporting rate was 63.7%. No CPG considered equity, feasibility or acceptability of the recommendations (item 14c), and only one CPG described the role of funders (item 18b). Guidelines that reported funding or were published in higher-impact journals tended to have a higher reporting quality, whereas the reporting rate in the one included Chinese-language CPG was low.

CONCLUSIONS

Reporting quality of melanoma CPGs tends to be relatively good. The CPGs developed in China were however an exception. The use of the 2016 RIGHT tool in guideline development should be encouraged to support rigorous and transparent reporting.

Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging for Sentinel Lymph Node Identification in Melanoma Surgery

Although less common than other types of skin cancers, melanoma is accountable for the majority of skin cancer-related deaths. The standard management for patients with clinically negative nodes includes a sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, which is commonly performed using a combination of radioactive tracer (Tc-99) and a blue dye (isosulfan or patent blue). There are numerous drawbacks associated with Tc-99 and blue dyes such as elevated costs, logistical challenges, and anaphylactic reactions among others. In recent years, near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) has emerged as a safe, effective, less costly, and more convenient alternative for the identification of SLNs in melanoma. We discuss the case of a 51-year-old man with melanoma in his left upper back. Two SLNs in the left axilla were successfully identified using NIR fluorescence. NIR fluorescence with ICG for SLN identification has proven to increase the sensitivity and accuracy when used in combination with lymphoscintigraphy.

Sentinel Node Biopsy for Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is the most precise and accurate staging technique for malignant melanoma. This resulted from international collaborations and technical innovations across subspecialties and systematic and methodical study of real-time clinical problems. This article describes sentinel node biopsy from conception to current techniques. Indications for the procedure and evidence of its prognostic value are discussed. Controversies surrounding results of Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial I and II and German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group Selective Lymphadenectomy trial are reviewed. Head and neck melanoma is presented as a unique subsite for performing sentinel node biopsy and when considering completion cervical lymphadenectomy.

Desmoplastic melanoma: a review of its pathology and clinical behaviour, and of management recommendations in published guidelines

Desmoplastic melanomas are uncommon. Their behaviour differs from that of other melanoma subtypes; therefore, management guidelines for non-desmoplastic melanomas may not be applicable. This review sought to examine all available evidence relating to the behaviour and management of desmoplastic melanomas, based on review of all relevant English-language publications, and to critically assess the recommendations for their management in current published melanoma management guidelines. Compared with other melanoma subtypes, patients with 'pure' desmoplastic melanomas (where ≥90% of the invasive melanoma is of desmoplastic melanoma subtype) have much lower rates of sentinel node positivity and distant metastasis. Local recurrence rates are higher for desmoplastic melanomas, but resection margins wider than those recommended for non-desmoplastic melanomas have not been shown to be of benefit. Adjuvant radiotherapy reduces the risk of local recurrence when a satisfactory histological clearance (≥8 mm) cannot be achieved. Of 29 published melanoma management guidelines identified, only 11 specified management for desmoplastic melanomas, while seven simply stated that the feature should be reported. Desmoplastic melanoma is a unique melanoma subtype with biology that differs from that of other melanoma subtypes. It requires specific management strategies but few current guidelines address these.

Does the time interval between sentinel lymph node biopsy and completion lymph node dissection affect outcome in malignant melanoma? A retrospective cohort study

Nodal clearance was recommended after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) despite further metastases to the regional lymph node basin being found in only 6-21% in the literature. This retrospective study was conducted to determine the role of the time interval between excision of primary melanoma and confirmed metastasis in the sentinel lymph node biopsy as well as the one between positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB-positive patients) and subsequent completion lymph node dissection (CLND) on the presence of metastases. The monocentric analysis included 121 patients with a history of completion lymph node dissection after positive SLNB from January 2005 to October 2013. Additional metastases in the regional lymph node basin (non-sentinels) were found in 14.05% (n = 17). Significant risk factors for the presence of metastases in CLND were the time between confirmed primary tumour to metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) (p = 0.0034), N-category of TNM-classification (p = 0.0066) and independent of thickness of primary tumour (p = 0.11). If SLNB was performed up to forty-three days after confirmed primary melanoma, subsequent lymph node dissection was positive in less than 9.1%. When SLNB was performed with a delay of more than 80 days, all patients had metastases in the CLND specimens. Our data analysis suggests that delays in subsequent procedures of SLNB after diagnosis of primary melanoma may have a greater impact on positivity of non-sentinel lymph nodes than previously assumed. Our retrospective analysis may indicate the reconsideration of time schedule in the management of primary melanoma to potentially avoid local relapse in the draining lymph node region after positive SLNB.