Peritoneal Dialysis for Heart Failure

LCZ696 attenuates sepsis-induced liver dysfunction in rats; the role of oxidative stress, apoptosis, and JNK1/2-P38 signaling pathways

AIM

Sepsis is a serious inflammatory response to infection with an annual incidence rate of >48 million cases and 11 million fatalities worldwide. Furthermore, sepsis remains the world's fifth-greatest cause of death. For the first time, the current study aims to evaluate the possible hepatoprotective benefits of LCZ696, a combination of an angiotensin receptor blocker (valsartan) and a neprilysin inhibitor prodrug (sacubitril), on cecal ligation and puncture (CLP)-induced sepsis in rats.

MAIN METHODS

CLP was employed to induce sepsis. Hepatic malondialdehyde (MDA), reduced glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and caspase 3 were assessed using ELISA. Serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) were also measured. Western blot assay was used to determine the expression of JNK1/2 and P38 proteins. The histology of liver tissues was also examined.

KEY FINDINGS

CLP resulted in significant elevation of AST, ALT, MDA, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, and caspase 3 levels, and up-regulation of p/t JNK1/2, and p/t P38 proteins, as compared to the sham group. However, level of GSH, and SOD activity were reduced in CLP group. LCZ696 significantly improved all the previously mentioned biochemical and histological abnormalities better than using valsartan alone.

SIGNIFICANCE

LCZ696 substantially ameliorated CLP-induced liver damage, compared to valsartan, by reducing proinflammatory mediators, inhibiting the JNK1/2 and P38 signaling pathway, and attenuating apoptosis.

The Importance of the Nephrologist in the Treatment of the Diuretic-Resistant Heart Failure

Heart failure is not only a global problem but also significantly limits the life prospects of these patients. The epidemiology and presentation of heart failure are intensively researched topics in cardiology. The risk factors leading to heart failure are well known; however, the real challenge is to provide effective treatments. A vicious cycle develops in heart failure of all etiologies, sooner or later compromising both cardiac and kidney functions simultaneously. This can explain the repeated hospital admissions due to decompensation and the significantly reduced quality of life. Moreover, diuretic-refractory heart failure represents a distinct challenge due to repeated hospital admissions and increased mortality. In our narrative review, we wanted to draw attention to nephrology treatment options for severe diuretic-resistant heart failure. The incremental value of peritoneal dialysis in severe heart failure and the feasibility of percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion have been well known for many years. In contrast, the science and narrative of acute peritoneal dialysis in diuretic-resistant heart failure remains underrepresented. We believe that nephrologists are uniquely positioned to help these patients by providing acute peritoneal dialysis to reduce hospitalization dependency and increase their quality of life.

Ultrafiltration in Heart Failure: A Review

Ultrafiltration is an effective method to get rid of fluid retention and congestion in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (HF) without affecting the circulating volume. Although its efficacy in comparison to diuretics is debatable, the evaluation of our analysis is based on various studies that comprise published clinical trials on ultrafiltration and studies comparing the efficacy of diuretics and ultrafiltration. Apart from this, we also look at literature that provides shortcomings of the said procedure and its scope for future advancements. Heart failure ultimately leads to volume overload, which is a highly concerning complication. Diuretics have been used as a first-line treatment for fluid overload but are becoming inefficacious due to the development of resistance and renal dysfunction. Ultrafiltration, on the other hand, is an attractive alternative to counter volume overload and congestion, which are unresponsive to medical therapy. There is also evidence that it significantly decreases the probability of future episodes of decompensation. There are, however, disagreements about whether ultrafiltration is an effective method to improve mortality in these patients. There is a lack of conclusive studies demonstrating the superiority of one fluid removal method over another. Hence, it is imperative to continue searching for the most effective method to treat congestion. Priority should be given to more mechanistic studies regarding ultrafiltration.

Comparison of survival rates between incident hemodialysis patients and peritoneal dialysis patients: a 5-year prospective cohort study with propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

The effect of dialytic modality at the start of renal replacement therapy on prognosis is controversial.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing incident hemodialysis (HD) (n = 646) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) (n = 72). We excluded patients who lacked complete data for 3 months. One-to-one propensity score (PS) matching was performed before between-group comparison of survival rates (Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test) and identification of factors affecting prognosis (Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis).

RESULTS

We enrolled 621 and 71 patients undergoing HD and PD, respectively (overall mean ± standard deviation age: 74 ± 13 years); 20% had cardiovascular disease (CVD). The median follow-up period was 41 (interquartile range 24-66) months. Following PS matching, we analyzed 65 patients undergoing HD and PD each. The 5-year overall survival rates did not differ between the groups (P = 0.97). The PD group exhibited a better CVD-related survival rate (P = 0.03). PD yielded adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause and CVD-related mortality of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-1.99, P = 0.97) and 3.92 (95% CI 1.05-14.7, P = 0.04), respectively. Age (P < 0.001) and the use of a central venous catheter (CVC) at dialytic initiation (P = 0.02) were independent risks for all-cause mortality; whereas, only the use of a CVC (P = 0.01) was an independent risk for CVD-related mortality.

CONCLUSION

Although no differences were observed in overall survival, CVD-related survival may be better with dialytic initiation with PD than with HD.

Caractéristiques et mortalité des patients avec et sans syndrome cardio-rénal traités par dialyse péritonéale en France

IntroductionGlobalement, la dialyse péritonéale (DP) est de plus en plus indiquée dans l’insuffisance cardiaque réfractaire. Cette étude a pour but d’analyser les caractéristiques et la survie des patients traités par DP, en les divisant en deux groupes, avec et sans syndrome cardio-rénal (CRS). MéthodesIl s’agit d’une étude rétrospective incluant tous les patients inscrits dans le Registre de Dialyse Péritonéale de Langue Française (RDPLF) entre le 01/01/2010 et le 01/12/2021. La cohorte a été divisée en deux groupes afin de comparer les patients avec et sans CRS. La survie a été analysée par la méthode de Kaplan Meier et une régression de Cox a identifié les facteurs associés avec la mortalité dans les deux groupes. Résultats11730 patients en DP ont été inclus. L’âge moyen était de 66.78±16.72 ans. 766 patient (6,53 %) ont été pris en charge en DP pour CRS et 10 964 pour une autre néphropathie. Les malades avec CRS étaient plus âgés et comorbides. La survie est significativement meilleure dans le groupe sans CRS (Log Rank test < 0.001). La médiane de survie est de 17.7±1.2 mois et 49.6±0.7 mois chez les patients avec et sans CRS respectivement. En analyse multivariée, l’âge, le sexe masculin, le diabète, les pathologies cardio-vasculaires et le manque d’autonomie sont liés à une mortalité accrue dans le groupe sans CRS. Par contre, chez les patients avec CRS, seules les variables âge et antécédent d’hépatopathie sont significativement associées à un sur risque de décès. Le nombre de péritonites présentées par le patient est significativement associé à un moindre risque de décès dans les deux groupes. ConclusionCette étude nationale portant sur un grand nombre de patients traités par DP a révélé les grandes différences dans les caractéristiques et la survie entre ceux qui ont un CRS contre ceux qui n’en ont pas. En particulier, les deux facteurs les plus liés à la mortalité dans le groupe avec CRS sont l’âge et la pathologie hépatique.

The evolving role of multi-modality imaging in transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions

Tricuspid valve pathophysiology is not well-understood. Emergence of novel transcatheter tricuspid therapies has fueled the requirements for improved imaging visualization techniques and interventional imaging physician skillsets in guiding these complex transcatheter procedures. There is growing understanding on the clinical significance of tricuspid regurgitation which expanded the interest for percutaneous tricuspid valve interventions. The present review concentrates on three essential aspects of tricuspid valve pathophysiology: anatomical considerations for tricuspid interventions, optimal timing of tricuspid interventions by imaging guidance, and the role of interventional imaging physicians’ skillset and knowledge in this field.

Management of Heart Failure in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasingly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF) and HF is one of the leading causes of hospitalisation, morbidity and mortality in patients with impaired renal function. Currently, there is strong evidence to support the symptomatic and prognostic benefits of β-blockers, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone inhibitors (RAASis), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in patients with HF and CKD stages 1–3. However, ARNIs, RAASis and MRAs are often suboptimally prescribed for patients with CKD owing to concerns about hyperkalaemia and worsening renal function. There is growing evidence for the use of sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and IV iron therapy in the management of HF in patients with CKD. However, few studies have included patients with CKD stages 4–5 and patients receiving dialysis, limiting the assessment of the safety and efficacy of these therapies in advanced CKD. Interdisciplinary input from HF and renal specialists is required to provide integrated care for the growing number of patients with HF and CKD.

Plasma erythropoietin level and heart failure in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis: a cross-sectional study

Background

Renal anemia is the important complication in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD), and heart failure (HF) is the important complication in patients on dialysis. Decreasing endogenous erythropoietin (EPO) in patients with chronic kidney disease is a major cause of renal anemia. On the other hand, high levels of EPO have been associated with the prognosis of patients with chronic HF. The association between plasma EPO and HF in patients on PD remains unclear. This study was designed to test our hypothesis that the plasma EPO level in patients on PD was associated with the markers of HF.

Methods

We investigated 39 patients undergoing PD at our hospital. We measured plasma EPO before erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) administration at the regular outpatient visits and then at 2 weeks after the final dose of ESA was administered and investigated the clinical factors. We estimated the correlations between the plasma EPO and the other parameters, and constructed univariate and multivariate logistic regression models for the risk for HF to estimate the effectiveness of plasma EPO and other factors on HF treatment in patients undergoing PD.

Results

The plasma EPO concentration was positively correlated with the ESA dose and negatively correlated with serum ferrum, transferrin saturation, and body mass index and showed no correlation with other factors, such as the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification and ferritin level. In univariate analysis, the factors significantly associated with HF risk were N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP), cardiothoracic ratio (CTR), serum creatinine (Cr), serum beta 2 microglobulin, dialysate dose, left ventricular mass index, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and weekly Kt/V. We performed a multivariate analysis with NT-pro BNP, Cr, and CTR, and all three factors were significant in the analysis.

Conclusion

The plasma EPO level in patients undergoing PD was positively correlated with the monthly ESA dose and was not significant as a marker of HF, as judged with the NYHA classification. Therefore, the plasma EPO level may not be a useful marker for HF in patients undergoing PD.

Outcomes after Acute Peritoneal Dialysis for Critical Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 1

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to demonstrate the outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in critically ill cardiorenal syndrome type 1 (CRS1).

METHODS

A cohort of 147 patients with CRS1 who received PD from 2011 to 2019 in a referral hospital in Thailand was analyzed. The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. Ultrafiltration and net fluid balance among survivors and nonsurvivors in the first 5 PD sessions were compared.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality rate was 73.4%. Most patients were critically ill CRS1 (all patients had a respiratory failure of which 68% had cardiogenic shock). Blood urea nitrogen and creatinine at the commencement of PD were 60.1 and 4.05 mg/dL. In multivariable analysis, increasing age, unstable hemodynamics, and positive fluid balance in the first 5 PD sessions were associated with the risk of in-hospital mortality. The change of fluid balance per day during the first 5 dialysis days was significantly different among survivor and nonsurvivor groups (-353 vs. 175 mL per day, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PD is a viable dialysis option in CRS1, especially in a resource-limited setting. PD can save up to 27% of lives among patients with critically ill CRS1.

Comparison of Cardiovascular Outcomes by Dialysis Modality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Debates exist regarding the merit of starting one dialysis modality over the other for improved cardiovascular outcomes. Five previously published prospective and retrospective cohort studies have reported inconsistent conclusions on this topic. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the influence initiation of hemodialysis (HD) vs peritoneal dialysis (PD) may have on the relative risk (RR) of subsequent development of adverse cardiovascular events (ACVE) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Of the 518 records identified, 5 cohort studies, assessing a total of 47,062 patients were included in the meta-analysis. With regard to the subsequent development of ACVE following initiation on the different dialysis modalities, the pooled RR was found to be non-significant. Peritoneal dialysis is a suitable and cost-effective alternative to HD for ESRD patients at risk of cardiovascular disease.

The use of peritoneal dialysis in heart failure: A systematic review

Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Extracorporeal (EC) therapy, including ultrafiltration (UF) and haemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) and peritoneal ultrafiltration (PUF) are potential therapeutic options in diuretic-resistant states. This systematic review assessed outcomes of PD and compared the effects of PD to EC. A comprehensive search of major databases from 1966 to 2017 for studies utilising PD (or PUF) in diuretic-resistant HF was conducted, excluding studies involving patients with end-stage kidney disease. Data were extracted and combined using a random-effects model, expressed as odds ratio (OR). Thirty-one studies (n = 902) were identified from 3195 citations. None were randomised trials. Survival was variable (0-100%) with a wide follow-up duration (36 h-10 years). With follow-up > 1 year, the overall mortality was 48.3%. Only four studies compared PD with EC. Survival was 42.1% with PD and 45.0% with EC; the pooled effect did not favour either (OR 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24-2.69; p = 0.710). Studies on PD in patients with HF reported several benefits. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved after PD (OR 3.76, 95%CI: 2.24-5.27; p < 0.001). Seven of nine studies saw LVEF increase by > 10%. Twenty-one studies reported the New York Heart Association status and 40-100% of the patients improved by ≥ 1 grade. Nine of 10 studies reported reductions in hospitalisation frequency and/or duration. When treated with PD, HF patients had fewer symptoms, lower hospital admissions and duration compared to diuretic therapy. However, there is inadequate evidence comparing PD versus UF or HD. Further studies comparing these modalities in diuretic-resistant HF should be conducted.

A comparison of the risk of congestive heart failure-related hospitalizations in patients receiving hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis - A retrospective propensity score-matched study

Introduction

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is associated with high mortality and a heavy financial and healthcare burden in the dialysis population. Determining which dialysis modality is associated with a higher risk of developing CHF might facilitate clinical decision making and surveillance programs in the dialysis population.

Methods

Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database, we recruited all incident dialysis patients during the period from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2010. The propensity score matching method was applied to establish the matched hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) cohort. Incidence rates and cumulative incidence rates of CHF-related hospitalization were first compared for the HD and PD patients. Multivariable subdistribution hazards models were then constructed to control for potential confounders.

Results

Among a total of 65,899 enrolled dialysis patients, 4,754 matched pairs of HD and PD patients were identified. The incidence rates of CHF in the matched HD and PD patients were 25.98 and 19.71 per 1000 patient-years, respectively (P = 0.001). The cumulative incidence rate of CHF was also higher in the matched HD patients (0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI)(0.12–0.21)] than in the corresponding PD patients (0.09, 95% CI [0.08–0.11])(P<0.0001). HD was consistently associated with an increased subdistribution hazard ratio (HR) of CHF compared with PD in the matched cohort (HR: 1.45, 95% CI [1.23–1.7]). Similar phenomenons were observed in either the subgroup analysis stratified by selected confounders or in the HD and PD group without matching.

Conclusions

HD is associated with a higher risk of developing CHF-related hospitalization than PD. The surveillance program for CHF should differ in patients receiving different dialysis modalities.

Acute Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, complications, and mortality rate associated with acute peritoneal dialysis (PD) in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI).

Methods

A total of 75 patients who were treated at Samsung Changwon Hospital between February 2005 and March 2016 were included in the study sample. The outcomes included in-hospital survival, renal recovery, metabolic and fluid control rates, and technical success rates.

Results

Refractory heart failure was the most frequent cause of acute PD (49.3%), followed by hepatic failure (20.0%), septic shock (14.7%), acute pancreatitis (9.3%), and unknown causes (6.7%). The hospital survival of patients in the acute PD was 48.0%. Etiologies of acute kidney injury (AKI) (refractory heart failure, acute pancreatitis compared with hepatic failure, septic shock or miscellaneous causes), use of inotropes, use of a ventilator, and simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II were associated with survival differences. Maintenance dialysis required after survival was high (80.1% [29/36]) due to AKI etiologies (heart or hepatic failures). Metabolic and fluid control rates were 77.3%. The technical success rate for acute PD was 93.3%.

Conclusion

Acute PD remains a suitable treatment modality for patients with AKI in the era of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Nearly all patients who require dialysis can be dialyzed with acute PD without mechanical difficulties. This is particularly true in patients with refractory heart failure and acute pancreatitis who had a weak requirement for inotropes.

Heart failure in patients with kidney disease

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the population of CKD patients with concurrent HF continues to grow. The accurate diagnosis of HF is challenging in patients with CKD in part due to a lack of validated imaging and biomarkers specifically in this population. The pathophysiology between the heart and the kidneys is complex and bidirectional. Patients with CKD have greater prevalence of traditional HF risk factors as well as unique kidney-specific risk factors including malnutrition, acid-base alterations, uraemic toxins, bone mineral changes, anemia and myocardial stunning. These risk factors also contribute to the decline of kidney function seen in patients with subclinical and clinical HF. More targeted HF therapies may improve outcomes in patients with kidney disease as current HF therapies are underutilised in this population. Further work is also needed to develop novel HF therapies for the CKD population.

Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients with Heart and Kidney Failure

The incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) is high as CKD and CHF share underlying risk factors such as arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus and atherosclerosis. Cardiac failure leads to renal hypoperfusion and dysfunction and then fluid overload and need for aggressive diuretic therapy. However, development of diuretic resistance represents a significant problem in the management of these patients. The role of Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) is important for patients who do not response to conservative management of fluid overload facilitating the failing heart to restore function. According to the guidelines, venovenous isolated Ultrafiltration (UF) is indicated for patients with refractory congestion not responding to medical therapy with loop diuretics and infusion of dopamine. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effect of UF vs. IV furosemide for decompensated heart failure showed a benefit of UF on total body weight loss and on readmissions due to heart failure in patients with decompensated heart failure and CKD. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) can provide efficient ultrafiltration and sodium extraction in volume overloaded patients followed by decline of hospitalization days, decrease of body weight and improvement of LVEF in patients with refractory heart failure. The continuous draw of ultrafiltrate is followed by a lesser risk of abrupt hypotension and better preservation of the residual kidney function. This represents a significant advantage of PD over intermittent UF by dialysis. In conclusion, application of UF by dialysis and PD is followed by significant total body weight loss, reduced need for hospital readmissions and better quality of life. PD has a higher probability of preservation of residual kidney function and can be used by patients at home.