Percutaneous portal venoplasty and stenting for anastomotic stenosis after liver transplantation

Successful Interventional Therapy for Portal Vein Stenosis after Ex Vivo Liver Resection and Autotransplantation in End-Stage Hepatic Alveolar Echinococcosis with Cavernous Transformation

BACKGROUND End-stage hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (AE) can result in cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV) due to extensive invasion of the portal vein. Ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation (ELRA) is a new treatment option for patients with end-stage hepatic AE combined with CTPV. ELRA can achieve radical resection of HAE lesions and vascular reconstruction, and also effectively controls bleeding, particularly in cases involving multiple tortuous PV collaterals. Unfortunately, postoperative complications related to the portal vein can impede liver blood flow, thereby increasing the risk of portal hypertension and eventual failure of the transplanted liver if not promptly treated through appropriate medical interventions. CASE REPORT We report the case of a 31-year-old woman who underwent ELRA for end-stage hepatic AE combined with CTPV, and early postoperative portal vein anastomotic stenosis occurred. Stenting of the portal vein was performed after clarification of the stenotic segment by portal venography, followed by anticoagulation therapy and close ultrasound follow-up. After the operation, the patient's portal vein anastomosis widened and the blood flow into the liver returned to normal, avoiding graft liver failure. At 3-year follow-up, the portal vein stent was patent and no serious portal vein complications such as thrombosis had occurred. CONCLUSIONS ELRA provides a new therapeutic approach for patients with HAE combined with CTPV, and intraoperative portal vein reconstruction is one of the key procedures. For CTPV patients with early postoperative portal vein stenosis, interventional therapy (IVR) offers fresh perspectives and avoids acute liver failure caused by liver hypoperfusion.

Endovascular Stenting for Idiopathic Stenosis of the Superior Mesenteric Vein: A Case Report

Idiopathic superior mesenteric vein (SMV) stenosis, where no clear causative factor is identifiable, remains a clinical rarity. We present a detailed case report of a patient with idiopathic stenosis of the SMV who underwent successful endovascular stenting. This report outlines the patient's clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging findings, procedural approach by the interventional radiology team, and subsequent management. Endovascular stenting is a viable therapeutic option for patients with idiopathic SMV stenosis. This case demonstrates that with appropriate interventional and post-procedural management, long-term stent patency and thrombosis prevention can be achieved. The success of this case encourages further investigation into endovascular treatments for venous stenoses.

Vascular complications after liver transplantation: contemporary approaches to detection and treatment. A literature review

Vascular complications (VCs) after liver transplantation (LT) are rare but are one of the most dreaded conditions that can potentially lead to graft loss and recipient death. This paper has analyzed the international experience in the early diagnosis of various VCs that can develop following LT, as well as the optimal timing and methods of treatment of these complications.

Imaging and Intervention in the Management of Vascular Complications Following Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice in majority of the patients with end stage liver disease. Vascular complication following liver transplantation is seen in around 7-13% of the patients and is associated with graft dysfunction and high morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are crucial in management of these patients. Advances in interventional radiology have significantly improved the management of vascular complications using minimally invasive percutaneous approach. Endovascular management is preferred in patients with late hepatic artery thrombosis, or stenosis, whereas retransplantation, surgical revision, or endovascular management can be considered in patients with early hepatic artery thrombosis or stenosis. Hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm, arterioportal fistula, and splenic artery steal syndrome are often treated by endovascular means. Endovascular management is also preferred in patients with symptomatic portal vein stenosis, early portal vein thrombosis, and symptomatic late portal vein thrombosis, whereas surgical revision or retransplantation is preferred in patients with perioperative portal vein thrombosis occurring within 3 days of transplantation. Venoplasty with or without stent placement can be considered in patients with hepatic venous outflow tract or inferior vena cava obstruction. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) may be required in transplant recipients who develop cirrhosis, often, secondary to disease recurrence, or chronic rejection. Indications for TIPS remain same in the transplant patients; however, major difference is altered vascular anatomy, for which adjunct techniques may be required to create TIPS.

Interventional treatment for portal vein complications utilizing a hybrid operating room after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Vascular complications after liver transplantation (LT) can be lethal and require immediate treatment to prevent graft failure. Nowadays, with interventional radiology (IR), approaches such as the percutaneous transhepatic (PTH) and transileocolic venous (TIC), have become major treatment options. We reviewed the safety and efficacy of a hybrid operating room (OR) for portal vein complications after LT.

METHODS

Patients who underwent IR for post-LT vascular complications in the hybrid OR from May 2014 to May 2022 were enrolled. Patients who underwent post-LT IR in conventional angiography rooms were excluded.

RESULTS

Nine patients developed portal vein complications; eight after living donor LT and one after deceased donor LT. Six patients had portal vein stenosis, two had portal vein thrombosis, and one had both. In the hybrid OR, PTH and TIC were used in five and three cases, respectively. The Rendezvous technique was used in one case. Angioplasty was performed in all patients. A stent was placed in four patients. The portal venous pressure gradient across the stenotic site significantly decreased after IR (P &= 0.031). The IR success rate in the hybrid OR was 100%.

CONCLUSION

The hybrid OR enables us to accomplish IR for post-LT vascular complications safely and effectively.

Long-term efficacy and risk factors for stent occlusion in portal vein stent placement: a multi-institutional retrospective study

Background

Surgical treatment for PV (portal vein) stenosis/occlusion can pose a fatal risk of massive bleeding from severe adhesions and collateral vessel formation. PV stents placement is a minimally invasive and effective procedure for PV stenosis/occlusion, but PV stents sometimes occlude. The relationship between post-stent PV hemodynamics and stent occlusion has not been thoroughly investigated. Certain precautions during PV stent placement may reduce the risk of stent occlusion. This study aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes of PV stent patency and investigate factors including PV hemodynamics associated with stent occlusion.

Materials and methods

Thirty-four consecutive patients with PV stenosis/occlusion who underwent PV stent placement in four institutions between December 2006 and February 2021 were retrospectively examined. The primary study endpoints were technical success, clinical success, and cumulative stent patency rate. The secondary endpoints were risk factors of stent occlusion. A univariable Cox proportional hazards model with sixteen variables was used to determine predictors of stent occlusion. Factors with p-value ≤ 0.1 in univariable analysis were included in the multivariable analysis. Alpha was set at 0.05.

Results

Technical and clinical success rates were 88.2% and 79.4%, respectively. Six patients (17.7%) experienced stent occlusion. The cumulative stent patency rate at six months, one year, and three years was 79.1%, 79.1%, and 65.9%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the variables with p-value ≤ 0.1 were lesion length > 4 cm, hepatofugal collateral vein visualization after stent placement, and residual stenosis > 30% after stent placement. In the multivariate analysis, residual stenosis > 30% after stent placement was significantly associated with stent occlusion (hazard ratio, 10.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–108.44; p = 0.04).

Conclusion

PV stent placement was technically feasible and effective in improving portal hypertension. However, stent occlusion was not uncommon. Residual stenosis > 30% after stent placement was significantly associated with stent occlusion. We should pay attention to correctly assess the range of stenosis and release the stenosis as much as possible.

Transsplenic Portal System Catheterization: Review of Current Indications and Techniques

Multiple diseases of the portal system require effective portal vein access for endovascular management. While percutaneous transhepatic and transjugular approaches remain the standard methods of portal vein access, transsplenic access (TSA) has gained recognition as an effective and safe technique to access the portal system in patients with contraindications to traditional approaches. Recently, the utility of percutaneous TSA has grown, with described treatments including recanalization of chronic portal vein occlusion, placement of stents for portal vein stenosis, portal vein embolization of the liver, embolization of gastric varices, placement of complicated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, and interventions after liver transplant. The authors provide a review of percutaneous TSA, including indications, a summary of related portal vein diseases, and the different techniques used for access and closure. In addition, an imaging-based review of technical considerations of TSA interventions is presented, with a review of potential procedural complications. With technical success rates that mirror or rival the standard methods and reported low rates of major complications, TSA can be a safe and effective option in clinical scenarios where traditional approaches are not feasible. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Recent Improvement in Survival Outcomes and Reappraisal of Prognostic Factors in Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a significant advancement for the treatment of children with end-stage liver disease given the shortage of deceased donors. The ultimate goal of pediatric LDLT is to achieve complete donor safety and zero recipient mortality. We conducted a retrospective, single-center assessment of the outcomes as well as the clinical factors that may influence graft and patient survival after primary LDLTs performed between 1994 and 2020. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analyses. The trends for independent prognostic factors were analyzed according to the following treatment eras: 1, 1994 to 2002; 2, 2003 to 2011; and 3, 2012 to 2020. Primary LDLTs were performed on 287 children during the study period. Biliary atresia (BA; 52%), acute liver failure (ALF; 26%), and monogenic liver disease (11%) were the leading indications. There were 45 graft losses (16%) and 27 patient deaths (7%) in this population during the study period. During era 1 (n = 81), the cumulative survival rates at 1 and 5 years after LDLT were 90.1% and 81.5% for patients and 86.4% and 77.8% for grafts, respectively. During era 2 (n = 113), the corresponding rates were 92.9% and 92% for patients and 89.4% and 86.7% for grafts, respectively. During era 3 (n = 93), the corresponding rates were 100% and 98.6% for patients and 98.9% and 95.4% for grafts, respectively. In the multivariate analyses, primary diagnosis ALF, bloodstream infection, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease, and chronic rejection were found to be negative prognostic indicators for patient survival. Based on generalized care guidelines and center-oriented experiences, comprehensive advances in appropriate donor selection, refinement of surgical techniques, and meticulous medical management may eventually realize a zero-mortality rate in pediatric LDLT.

Transhepatic tract hemostasis using thermal-ablation after percutaneous portal vein access

Objectives:

Bleeding risk after percutaneous portal vein access procedures is not negligible. Various agents, coils and plug, have been used to minimize this risk, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. This study reports the results of coagulation using thermal-ablation (radiofrequency or microwave ablation) as an alternative to trans-hepatic puncture tract closure.

Methods:

Ten patients who benefited from portal vein recanalization or portal hypertension-relative bleeding complication embolization using percutaneous portal vein access and who underwent thermal-ablation of the puncture tract between December 30, 2019 and July 16, 2020 were included. Early efficiency and safety were evaluated using imaging (ultrasound and/or CT scan) and laboratory data (hemoglobin, hepatic function) at 24 h. Follow-up was performed until August 2020.

Results:

No bleeding from the puncture tract and no embolization-related complications were observed in all 10 patients at 24 h or during follow-up with median of 3 months (range 1–8 months), even in case of ascites or therapeutic coagulation.

Conclusion:

Thermal-ablation seems to be a safe, effective and rapid technique to avoid bleeding after percutaneous transhepatic direct portal vein access.

Advances in knowledge:

Thermal-ablation could be an alternative for transhepatic puncture tract closure especially for patients with high bleeding risk.

Portal Vein Stent Placement in Anastomotic Stenosis After Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

Vascular complications (VCs) after liver transplantation (LT) frequently result in graft and patient loss. The smaller vessels and the insufficient length for reconstruction in living donor LT and pediatric transplantation predispose patients to a higher incidence of VCs. Herein we present a case of portal vein stenosis (PVS) in an adult deceased donor LT recipient with portal vein thrombosis requiring extended thrombectomy at the time of LT. He presented with ascites 4 months after LT, was diagnosed with PVS, and was successfully treated with percutaneous transhepatic venoplasty and placement of a portal stent. This case highlights the importance of Doppler ultrasound as a screening modality for detection of VCs after LT and the pivotal role of endovascular repair as a first-line treatment for PVS.

Long term clinical outcomes of portal vein stenting for symptomatic portal vein stenosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Gastrointestinal bleeding caused by portal vein (PV) stenosis is serious complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) The purpose of this study is to reveal the long-term clinical outcomes of PV stenting for symptomatic PV stenosis and risk factors of stent related complication.Fifteen patients who underwent portal vein stenting for symptomatic PV stenosis after PD between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The whole cohort was divided into 9 patients with benign stenosis group (Group-B) and 6 patients with recurrence group (Group-R).The median follow up period was 17.0 (interquartile range 12.0-38.0) months. The technical success rate and clinical success rate was revealed at 93.3% and 86.7%. The primary patency rate of stents was 79.4% and mean patency period was 14.0 (4.0-28.0) months. There was significant difference in time to stenosis and proportion of anticoagulation treatment between 2 groups [2.0 (1.0-4.0) months vs 18.5 (2.5-50.3) months, P  = .035 and 100% vs 50%, P  = .044. In univariable analysis, stent diameter was found to have a significant correlation with stent occlusion (P  = .036).PV stenting was found to be feasible and safe in the treatment of symptomatic PV stenosis from a long term point of view.

Portal vein stent placement after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic stent placement for portal vein (PV) stenosis after liver transplantation (LT) and hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 455 patients who underwent LT and 522 patients who underwent resection of the pancreatic head between June 2011 and February 2016. Technical success, clinical success, patency, and complications were evaluated for both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were confirmed to have postoperative PV stenosis and were treated with percutaneous transhepatic PV stent placement. The technical success rate was 100%, the clinical success rate was 80%, and the long-term stent patency was 91.3% for the entire study population. Two procedure-related hemorrhages and two early stent thromboses occurred in the HPB group while no complications occurred in the LT group. A literature review of selected studies reporting PV stent placement for the treatment of PV stenosis after HPB surgery and LT showed a technical success rate of 78-100%, a clinical success rate of 72-100%, and a long-term patency of 57-100%, whereas the procedure-related complication rate varied from 0-33.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous transhepatic PV stent is a safe and effective treatment for postoperative PV stenosis/occlusion in patients undergoing LT regardless of symptoms. Due to increased risk of complications, the indication for percutaneous PV stent placement after HPB surgery should be limited to patients with clinical symptoms after an individual assessment.

Endovascular Treatment of Spleno-Mesenteric-Portal Vein Thrombosis During Orthotopic Liver Transplant: 20 Years Later

PURPOSE

Our purpose is to present our experience in endovascular treatment of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) during orthotopic liver transplant (OLT), initial stages, and long-term follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 1994 and December 2019 we performed 1246 OLTs. A total of 170 (13.64%) had some grade of PVT at the time of OLT. Since May 2000 we have performed endovascular procedures during OLT in 52 patients with PVT grade III to IV Yerdel classification. Our research consists of the 49 patients with more than 1 year of follow-up. The initial surgical technique was eversion thromboendovenectomy when the portal flow was not adequate. Intraoperative portography and endovascular treatments were taken via the graft umbilical vein, one of the recipients' mesenteric veins, the recipient portal vein, or the graft portal vein. If the cause was an obstructive or incomplete thrombus removal, venoplasty and primary stent placement were performed.

RESULTS

Primary stent placement was achieved in 47 of 49 patients (95.9%): adequate portal perfusion in the allograf and portal hypertension were achieved. None of the patients died during surgery or at 30 days. At long-term follow-up, 3 patients (6.1%) had a portal vein rethrombosis due to no related causes. Cumulative survival rates were 89.7%, 79.3%, and 65.5% at 1, 5, and 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent placement in PVT during OLT is a safe and effective procedure to resolve liver graft perfusion. It is an anatomic and physiological derivation that guarantees appropriate hepatopetal portal flow to avoid rethrombosis and portal hypertension, with low mortality and morbility.

Benign Portal Vein Stenosis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

The long-term patency of the portal vein (PV) in patients who survive after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical features and risk factors for benign PV stenosis after PD.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the patients who underwent PD from September 2002 and December 2015 at our institution without intraoperative radiation therapy or concomitant PV resection. The postoperative computed tomography of each patient was evaluated, and PV stenosis was defined as the shortest diameter of the PV being <3 mm. The patients with PV stenosis due to local recurrence were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 458 patients, PV stenosis occurred in 57 (12.4%), including benign PV stenosis in 28 (6.1%) and PV stenosis due to local recurrence in 29 (6.3%). Of the 28 patients with benign PV stenosis, 7 (25%) developed symptoms related to portal hypertension, namely recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in 5 and refractory ascites in 2. Six patients were treated with percutaneous transhepatic PV stent placement, and all of their symptoms improved. A multivariate analysis found that a postoperative pancreatic fistula was an independent risk factor for benign PV stenosis after PD (odds ratio, 4.36; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative pancreatic fistula was a significant risk factor for benign PV stenosis after PD. Stent placement for benign PV stenosis was effective for the patients with symptoms due to portal hypertension.

Percutaneous treatment of symptomatic superior mesenteric vein stenosis using self-expanding nitinol stents

PURPOSE

To evaluate the technical and clinical success of percutaneous superior mesenteric vein (SMV) stenting in symptomatic patients using self-expanding nitinol stents.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the technical and clinical success of percutaneous SMV stenting of 6 symptomatic patients (3 men, mean age 67 years, range 48-81 years). Stenosis of the SMV was caused by postoperative stricture (n=3), pancreas carcinoma (n=1) and pancreatitis (n=2). As a result of the stenosis, 3 patients had symptomatic ascites, 2 patients showed signs of mesenteric ischemia and 1 patient had recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding. Stenting was performed by a percutaneous transhepatic approach using self-expanding nitinol stents.

RESULTS

Stenting of the SMV was technically and clinically successful in all patients. No peri-interventional complications occurred. The stent diameters ranged from 6 to 14 mm. During the mean follow-up of 6 months (range, 2-10 months) 1 patient presented early stent occlusion 2 weeks after placement.

CONCLUSION

Stenting of a symptomatic SMV stenosis using self-expanding nitinol stents is feasible and clinically effective.

Stent Placement for Portal Vein Stenosis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Portal vein (PV) stenosis is a worrisome late complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) that causes intestinal bleeding from varices, which must be diagnosed correctly and treated promptly. Recent reports advocate the usefulness of stent placement to improve PV stenosis.

METHODS

We evaluated the cause, diagnosis, and treatment method of PV stenosis after PD and the duration of stent patency in our institution.

RESULTS

Intestinal bleeding caused by PV stenosis occurred in 5 (2.4%) of 205 patients. A computed tomography scan was useful to diagnose this complication. Four of 5 patients with PV stenosis underwent percutaneous transhepatic PV stent placement. The duration of stent patency was 21-41 months, and no rebleeding occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous stent placement is viable, less invasive option than laparotomy for the management of PV stenosis after PD.

Portal vein patency after pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer

BACKGROUND

The fate of the portal vein (PV) after pancreatoduodenectomy, especially its long-term patency and associated complications, has received little attention. The aim of this study was to explore the long-term patency rate of the PV after pancreatoduodenectomy, focusing on risk factors for PV stenosis/occlusion and associated complications.

METHODS

Serial CT images of patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer between January 2000 and June 2012 in a single institution were evaluated for PV stenosis or occlusion.

RESULTS

A total of 826 patients were enrolled. The PV stenosis/occlusion rate after pancreatoduodenectomy was 19.6 per cent and the 5-year patency rate 69.9 per cent. The most frequent cause of PV stenosis/occlusion was local recurrence followed by postoperative change and PV thrombosis. Patients who underwent PV resection had a higher PV stenosis/occlusion rate than those who did not (51 versus 17.4 per cent; P < 0.001). The 3-year patency rate was highest in patients with cancer of the ampulla of Vater and lowest in patients with pancreatic cancer (91.9 versus 55.5 per cent respectively; P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that risk factors for PV stenosis/occlusion included primary tumour location, chemoradiotherapy and PV resection. PV stenosis or occlusion without disease recurrence was observed in 17.3 per cent of the patients. PV resection and grade B or C pancreatic fistula were independent risk factors for PV stenosis/occlusion. Among 162 patients with PV stenosis or occlusion, five (3.1 per cent) had fatal recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding.

CONCLUSION

PV stenosis or occlusion is common after pancreatoduodenectomy, particularly if the PV has been resected and/or chemoradiotherapy was given after surgery. Although recurrence is the most frequent cause of PV stenosis/occlusion, this complication is found in a significant proportion of patients without disease recurrence.

Long-term outcome of percutaneous transhepatic balloon angioplasty for portal vein stenosis after pediatric living donor liver transplantation: a single institute's experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate retrospectively the long-term outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic balloon angioplasty performed for portal vein stenosis (PVS) after pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between October 1997 and December 2013, of 527 pediatric patients (age < 18 y) who underwent LDLT in a single institution, 43 patients (19 boys, 24 girls; mean age, 4.1 y ± 4.1) were confirmed to have PVS at direct portography with or without manometry and underwent percutaneous interventions, including balloon angioplasty with or without stent placement. Technical success, clinical success, laboratory findings, manometry findings, patency rates, and major complications were evaluated. Follow-up periods after initial balloon angioplasty ranged from 5-169 months (mean, 119 mo).

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 65 of 66 sessions (98.5%) and in 42 of 43 patients (97.7%), and clinical success was achieved in 37 of 43 patients (86.0%). Platelet counts improved significantly. Of 32 patients undergoing manometry, 19 showed significant improvement of pressure gradient across the stenosis after percutaneous transhepatic balloon angioplasty. At 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after balloon angioplasty, the rates of primary patency were 83%, 78%, 76%, and 70%, and the rates of primary-assisted patency were 100%, 100%, 100%, and 96%. Two major complications subsequent to balloon angioplasty were noted: severe asthma attack and portal vein thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous transhepatic balloon angioplasty is a safe and effective treatment with long-term patency for PVS after pediatric LDLT.

Percutaneous transhepatic portal vein stenting in a patient with benign non-transplant postoperative portal vein stenosis: A case report

Extrahepatic portal vein stenosis is caused by a variety of benign and malignant diseases and results in development of symptoms due to portal hypertension. Benign post-surgical adhesions causing portal vein stenosis in non-transplant population is an uncommon etiology of portal hypertension. Endovascular treatment of such patients with angioplasty and stenting is uncommonly reported in literature. We report a case of portal hypertension caused by benign postoperative portal vein fibrosis, successfully treated by self-expandable metallic stent.

Successful treatment by balloon angioplasty under portography for late-onset stenosis of portal vein after cadaveric liver transplantation

A 69-year-old woman, who underwent cadaveric liver transplantation for non-B, non-C liver cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma in April 2009, was admitted to our hospital because of graft dysfunction. Enhanced computed tomography revealed stenosis of the left branch of the portal vein, obstruction of the right branch of the portal vein at porta hepatis, and esophagogastric varices. Balloon angioplasty of the left branch of the portal vein under transsuperior mesenteric venous portography was performed by minilaparotomy. After dilatation of the left branch of the portal vein, the narrow segment of the portal vein was dilated, which resulted in reduction of collateral circulation. At 7 days after balloon angioplasty, esophageal varices were improved. The patient made a satisfactory recovery, was discharged 8 days after balloon angioplasty, and remains well.

Portal interventions in liver transplant recipients

Portal vein interventions in liver transplant recipients represent a group of interventions in the management of several disease entities including portal vein stenosis, portal vein thrombosis, and recurrent liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension with and without gastric varices. The procedures performed in these patient populations include portal vein angioplasty with or without stent placement for portal vein stenosis, portal vein thrombolysis with or without stent placement for portal vein thrombosis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts or splenic embolization for cirrhosis, and balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for gastric varices. This article discusses these disease entities and the minimal invasive procedures used in their management.

Hepatic encephalopathy in a liver transplant recipient with stable liver function

Postshunt hepatic encephalopathy after liver transplantation (LT) is an infrequent condition and is commonly associated with portal occlusion or stenosis and the presence of a patent portosystemic shunt. Portal vein stenosis (PVS) or thrombosis (PVT) are uncommon complications after LT. The overall frequency of both complications is reported to be less than 3%. When PVS or PVT develop early after LT, the occlusion of the portal vein can have catastrophic consequences to the graft including acute liver failure and graft loss. Late PVT/PVS are asymptomatic in approximately 50% of the cases and mainly diagnosed by a routine ultrasound. Symptomatic postshunt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a very infrequent condition after LT that has been scarcely reported in the literature. We present here the case of a liver recipient with normal graft function who presented with hepatic encephalopathy 3 months after LT with stable liver function but a severe portal stenosis and the presence of a spontaneous portosystemic shunt whose successful endovascular treatment was followed by the complete resolution of the HE.

Portal vein stenosis: a rare yet clinically important cause of delayed-onset ascites after adult deceased donor liver transplantation: two case reports

Vascular complications following liver transplantation are well documented. While complications involving the portal vein are less common than the hepatic artery, portal vein complications can lead to potentially life-threatening sequelae including graft loss. Portal vein stenosis is an infrequent complication following liver transplant. The majority of these complications are seen in living donor liver transplants and pediatric liver transplants. We present 2 cases of delayed onset portal vein stenosis in adult deceased donor liver transplantation (ADDLT). The first patient presented with refractory ascites twelve months after ADDLT. He was diagnosed and successfully treated with percutaneous transhepatic portovenography and venoplasty. The second patient had a history of irradiation to his portal bed in the setting of cholangiocarcinoma. He developed refractory ascites and esophageal variceal bleeding>2 years after ADDLT. He underwent percutaneous transhepatic portovenoplasty, but eventually required placement of a portal stent due to continued problems with recurrent ascites. These 2 cases highlight the importance of considering portal vein stenosis in the differential diagnosis of late-onset ascites following liver transplantation, especially if there have been any predisposing risk factors such as portal bed irradiation or prior splenectomy.

Transhepatic portal venous angioplasty with stenting for bleeding jejunal angiodysplasias in a retrasplant patient: a case report

A 41-year-old man, who had undergone liver retransplantation, was admitted to our institution complaining of rectorraghia. Gastroscopy and colonoscopy failed to detect the source of bleeding. Computed tomographic angiography detected a stenosis at the portal anastomosis. Capsule endoscopy showed the presence of multiple small bowel angiodysplasias. After a surgical failure, direct portography revealed severe stenosis of the extrahepatic portal vein. Subsequent to percutaneous transhepatic portography, we dilated the stenosis using a balloon catheter and placed an expandable metallic stent, stopping the bleeding without further episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding.

CD86 +1057 G/A polymorphism and the risk of colorectal cancer

CD86 (B7-2), one of the costimulatory molecules on antigen-presenting cells, plays essential roles not only in autoimmunity and transplantation but also in tumor immunity. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether CD86 gene polymorphism was involved in predisposing an individual to colorectal cancer (CRC). The CD86 +1057 G/A polymorphism was genotyped by performing polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism in 273 patients with CRC and 292 healthy controls. There were significant differences in the genotype and allele distribution of +1057 G/A polymorphism of the CD86 gene between cases and controls. The +1057 AA genotype was associated with a significantly increased risk of CRC when compared with the GG genotype (odds ratio [OR] = 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-3.58). Using the G allele as a reference, a significant correlation was detected between the presence of the A allele and a risk of developing CRC (OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.12-1.80). Interestingly, the A allele in female patients with CRC was significantly higher than that in male patients after stratified analysis (OR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.04-2.14). These data suggest that CD86 +1057G/A polymorphism may contribute to genetic susceptibility to CRC in a Chinese population.

Management of venous stenosis in living donor liver transplant recipients

AIM: To retrospectively evaluate the management and outcome of venous obstruction after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS: From February 1999 to May 2009, 1 intraoperative hepatic vein (HV) tension induced HV obstruction and 5 postoperative HV anastomotic stenosis occurred in 6 adult male LDLT recipients. Postoperative portal vein (PV) anastomotic stenosis occurred in 1 pediatric left lobe LDLT. Patients ranged in age from 9 to 56 years (median, 44 years). An air balloon was used to correct the intraoperative HV tension. Emergent surgical reoperation, transjugular HV balloon dilatation with stent placement and transfemoral venous HV balloon dilatation was performed for HV stenosis on days 3, 15, 50, 55, and 270 after LDLT, respectively. Balloon dilatation followed with stent placement via superior mesenteric vein was performed for the pediatric PV stenosis 168 d after LDLT.

RESULTS: The intraoperative HV tension was corrected with an air balloon. The recipient who underwent emergent reoperation for hepatic stenosis died of hemorrhagic shock and renal failure 2 d later. HV balloon dilatation via the transjugular and transfemoral venous approach was technically successful in all patients. The patient with early-onset HV stenosis receiving transjugular balloon dilatation and stent placement on the 15th postoperative day left hospital 1 wk later and disappeared, while the patient receiving the same interventional procedures on the 50th postoperative day died of graft failure and renal failure 2 wk later. Two patients with late-onset HV stenosis receiving balloon dilatation have survived for 8 and 4 mo without recurrent stenosis and ascites, respectively. Balloon dilatation and stent placement via the superior mesenteric venous approach was technically successful in the pediatric left lobe LDLT, and this patient has survived for 9 mo without recurrent PV stenosis and ascites.

CONCLUSION: Intraoperative balloon placement, emergent reoperation, proper interventional balloon dilatation and stent placement can be effective as a way to manage hepatic and PV stenosis during and after LDLT.