Safe major abdominal operations: Hepatectomy, gastrectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy in elder patients

Short‑ and long‑term outcomes after laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy for elderly patients: a propensity score‑matched study

BACKGROUND

The feasibility and safety of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) in elderly patients is still controversial. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of LPD and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) in elderly patients.

METHODS

Clinical and follow-up data of elderly patients (≥ 65 years) who underwent LPD or OPD between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. A 1:1 propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was performed to minimize differences between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to select independent prognostic factors for 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 410 elderly patients, 236 underwent LPD and 174 OPD. After PSM, the LPD group had a less estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 vs. 200 mL, P < 0.001), lower rates of intraoperative transfusion (10.4% vs. 19.0%, P = 0.029), more lymph node harvest (11.0 vs. 10.0, P = 0.014) and shorter postoperative length of stay (LOS) (13.0 vs. 16.0 days, P = 0.013). There were no significant differences in serious complications, reoperation, 90-day readmission and mortality rates (all P > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) was an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality. Elderly patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent LPD or OPD had similar overall survival (OS) (22.5 vs.20.4 months, P = 0.672) after PSM.

CONCLUSIONS

It is safe and feasible for elderly patients to undergo LPD with less EBL and a shorter postoperative LOS. There was no statistically significant difference in long-term survival outcomes between elderly PDAC patients who underwent LPD or OPD.

Application of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients

Background: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) involves complicated surgical procedures and is associated with high postoperative mortality. PD can be performed using laparoscopy; however, there is a lack of evidence on laparoscopic PD (LPD) outcomes in elderly patients. Therefore, this study aimed to compare LPD outcomes in elderly patients with those in patients aged <65 years and assess elderly outcomes according to the LPD surgical learning curve. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, medical records of 75 elderly patients (Group A) and 225 patients aged <65 years (Group B) were reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative data, as well as oncologic outcomes, were collected. To assess the effect of the surgical learning curve on outcomes of elderly patients, patients were equally divided into four phases, based on the number of surgeries performed at the study site. Results: The mean preoperative physical status score was significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (z = 5.222, P < .001), indicating higher disease severity. There were no significant differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, vascular reconstruction rate, or intensive care unit (ICU) stay between the groups. The blood transfusion rate (χ² = 4.301, P = .038) and length of postoperative hospital stay (z = 2.386, P = .017) were significantly higher in Group A than in Group B. The surgical resection margins and the number of lymph nodes harvested did not differ between the two groups; however, a significant difference was observed in pathological results. In assessing the surgical learning curve, the pairwise comparison of means showed that the operation times in phases 3 and 4 were shorter than that in phase 1 (P < .05) and differences in nasogastric tube removal time between the four groups were statistically significant (H = 15.390, P = .002). Conclusions: Advanced age alone should not be a contraindication for LPD, since outcomes for elderly patients who have undergone LPD are similar to those for younger patients.

Outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

Although the mortality and morbidity of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) have improved significantly over the past years, the concerns for elderly patients undergoing PD are still present. Furthermore, the frequency of PD is increasing because of the increasing proportion of elderly patients and the increasing incidence of periampullary tumors. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of PD in elderly patients.

METHODS

We studied all patients who had undergone PD in our center between January 1995 and February 2015. The patients were divided into three groups based on age: group I (patients aged <60 years), group II (those aged 60 to 69 years) and group III (those aged ≥70 years). The primary outcome was the rate of total postoperative complications. Secondary endpoint included total operative time, hospital mortality, length of postoperative hospital stay, delayed gastric emptying, re-exploration, and survival rate.

RESULTS

A total of 828 patients who had undergone PD for resection of periampullary tumor were included in this study. There were 579 (69.9%) patients in group I, 201 (24.3%) in group II, and 48 (5.8%) in group III. The overall incidence of complications was higher in elderly patients (25.9% in group I, 36.8% in group II, and 37.5% in group III; P=0.006). There were more patients complicated with delayed gastric emptying in group II compared with the other two groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula, biliary leakage, pancreatitis, pulmonary complications and hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

PD can be performed safely in selected elderly patients. Advanced age alone should not be a contraindication for PD. The outcome of elderly patients who have undergone PD is similar to that of younger patients, and the increased rate of complications is due to the presence of associated comorbidities.

Preoperative Serum Bilirubin and Lactate Levels Predict Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality in Liver Surgery: A Single-Center Evaluation

Background and Aims:

In spite of huge developments in liver surgery during the last decades, morbidity and mortality continue to pose problems in this field. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative predictors for postoperative mortality and morbidity in liver surgery.

Material and Methods:

In a single-center study, an extensive analysis of a prospective database, including clinical criteria and laboratory tests of patients undergoing liver surgery between July 2007 and July 2012 was performed. Cutoff values of selected laboratory tests were calculated.

Results:

In all, 337 patients were included in the study. Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant association of preoperative bilirubin, lactate, hemoglobin levels, platelet count, and prothrombin time with postoperative morbidity and mortality. Multivariate analysis revealed preoperatively elevated serum bilirubin and lactate levels as independent predictors for increased postoperative morbidity and mortality after liver surgery.

Conclusions:

The identified laboratory values showed a statistically significant association with postoperative morbidity and mortality in liver surgery and might be helpful in preoperative patient selection.

Nosocomial Infections and Microbiologic Spectrum after Major Elective Surgery of the Pancreas, Liver, Stomach, and Esophagus

BACKGROUND

The majority of infections treated by surgeons are nosocomial infections (NI). The frequency of these infections in relation to the organ operated on as well as the organisms involved are not well defined. Detailed knowledge of these issues is essential for optimal care of surgical patients. This study aimed to determine infection rates and the responsible pathogens after major elective surgery of the pancreas, liver, stomach, and esophagus.

METHODS

Between January 1, 2005 and August 31, 2007, the records of all patients of the Department of General, Abdominal and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg (Germany) with elective resection of the pancreas, liver, stomach, and esophagus were evaluated retrospectively. Study parameters were: Patient number, age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, indication for resection, operation duration, length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in hospital, mortality, organ-related rate and kind of NI, and microbiologic spectrum. Nosocomial infections were defined as: Surgical site infection (U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] 1 or 2) and intra-abdominal infection (CDC 3), urinary tract infection, clinical sepsis, blood stream and catheter-related infection, respiratory tract infection, and pneumonia.

RESULTS

A total of 358 patients were included: 150 (42%) with pancreas resection, 91 (25%) with liver resection, 105 (29%) with gastric resection, and 12 (3%) with esophagus resection. Median LOS in the ICU for all groups was 48.8 h (interquartile range [IQR] 24.9-91.8 h), median LOS in hospital was 16 d (IQR 13-23 d), and in-hospital mortality was 4.5%. Patients with NI had significantly greater in-hospital death and prolonged stay in hospital and ICU (p<0.001). In 120 (33.5%) patients, one or more NI occurred (range, 83% in esophagus patients to 21% in liver patients). Intra-abdominal (16.5%) and surgical site infections (12.3%) were most frequent; 80.8% of the NI were culture-positive. The most frequent clinically relevant isolates were Escherichia coli (12.4%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (12.2%), and Enterococcus faecium (9.7%). The highest resistance rates were found for Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA] 29.4%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (23.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients undergoing elective surgery of the pancreas, liver, stomach, and esophagus, considerable differences in demographic factors, frequency, and kind of NI exist. The consequences of NI force surgeons to analyze pre-operative risk factors carefully, assess indications for operation thoroughly, and optimize all controllable parameters.

Estimation of a predictor's importance by Random Forests when there is missing data: risk prediction in liver surgery using laboratory data

Abstract In the last few decades, new developments in liver surgery have led to an expanded applicability and an improved safety. However, liver surgery is still associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality, especially in extended resections. We analyzed a large liver surgery database to investigate whether laboratory parameters like haemoglobin, leucocytes, bilirubin, haematocrit and lactate might be relevant preoperative predictors. It is not uncommon to observe missing values in such data. This also holds for many other data sources and research fields. For analysis, one can make use of imputation methods or approaches that are able to deal with missing values in the predictor variables. A representative of the latter are Random Forests which also provide variable importance measures to assess a variable's relevance for prediction. Applied to the liver surgery data, we observed divergent results for the laboratory parameters, depending on the method used to cope with missing values. We therefore performed an extensive simulation study to investigate the properties of each approach. Findings and recommendations: Complete case analysis should not be used as it distorts the relevance of completely observed variables in an undesirable way. The estimation of a variable's importance by a self-contained measure that can deal with missing values appropriately reflects the decreased relevance of variables with missing values. It can therefore be used to obtain insight into Random Forests which are commonly fit without preprocessing of missing values in the data. By contrast, multiple imputation allows for the assessment of a variable's relevance one would potentially observe in complete-data situations, if imputation performs well. For the laboratory data, lactate and bilirubin seem to be associated with the risk of liver failure and postoperative complications. These relations should be investigated by future studies in more detail. However, it is important to carefully consider the method used for analysis when there are missing values in the predictor variables.

Benefits of simultaneous laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer and liver metastases

INTRODUCTION

Recently, consensus on the optimal strategy for resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastases (LM) seems to have shifted toward simultaneous resection. However, there are still relatively few reports about simultaneous laparoscopic resection. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent simultaneous laparoscopic resection.

METHODS

We evaluated 14 patients who underwent simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and LM in our hospital from 2004 to 2012. Patients were selected by matched pair analysis based on the number of LM (≤4) and tumor size (≤5 cm). We divided them into two groups: the simultaneous laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer and LM (Lap-S) group (n = 7) and the simultaneous open resection of primary colorectal cancer and LM (Open-S) group (n = 7). Clinical and oncologic outcomes were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The Lap-S patients were significantly older than the Open-S patients. The mean operative times of Lap-S and Open-S were 472 min and 466 min, respectively. The mean blood loss was significantly smaller in the Lap-S group (153 mL) than in the Open-S group (496 mL). There was no surgical mortality in either group. The incidence of postoperative complications in the Lap-S and Open-S groups was 12.3% and 33.0%, respectively. The mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the Lap-S group (16 days) than in the Open-S group (36 days). There was no significant difference in long-term survival between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Lap-S patients had equivalent long-term outcomes to Open-S patients. Therefore, given its technical feasibility and safety, Lap-S may be one of the most promising options in selected patients.

Outcome of hepatectomy in super-elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

  The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of super-elderly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients aged 80 years or more who underwent hepatectomy and to clarify whether elderly patients with HCC benefit from hepatectomy.

METHODS

  Between March 1992 and December 2008, 278 patients who underwent curative hepatectomy for HCC were investigated. Super-elderly patients were defined as those aged 80 years or more. Clinicopathological data and outcomes after hepatectomy were compared between super-elderly and non-super-elderly groups.

RESULTS

  Preoperative parameters, such as biochemical examinations, and liver function tests in the non-super-elderly group were comparable with those of the super-elderly group (n = 11). Exceptionally, albumin level in the super-elderly group was lower than that in the non-super-elderly group (P = 0.03). Surgical data and the prevalence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. No mortality was observed in the super-elderly and non-super-elderly group.

CONCLUSIONS

  Hepatectomy for HCC was a feasible option even in super elderly patients aged 80 years or older with accurate selection.

Risk factors for mortality in major digestive surgery in the elderly: a multicenter prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To identify the mortality risk factors of elderly patients (≥65 years old) during major digestive surgery, as defined according to the complexity of the operation.

BACKGROUND

In the aging populations of developed countries, the incidence rate of major digestive surgery is currently on the rise and is associated with a high mortality rate. Consequently, validated indicators must be developed to improve elderly patients' surgical care and outcomes.

METHODS

We acquired data from a multicenter prospective cohort that included 3322 consecutive patients undergoing major digestive surgery across 47 different facilities. We assessed 27 pre-, intra-, and postoperative demographic and clinical variables. A multivariate analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors of mortality in elderly patients (n = 1796). Young patients were used as a control group, and the end-point was defined as 30-day postoperative mortality.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort, postoperative mortality increased significantly among patients aged 65-74 years, and an age ≥65 years was by itself an independent risk factor for mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-3.59; P = 0.001). The mortality rate among elderly patients was 10.6%. Six independent risk factors of mortality were characteristic of the elderly patients: age ≥85 years (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.08-6.31; P = 0.032), emergency (OR, 3.42; 95% CI, 1.67-6.99; P = 0.001), anemia (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.02-3.17; P = 0.041), white cell count > 10,000/mm³ (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.08-3.35; P = 0.024), ASA class IV (OR, 9.86; 95% CI, 1.77-54.7; P = 0.009) and a palliative cancer operation (OR, 4.03; 95% CI, 1.99-8.19; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Characterization of independent validated risk indicators for mortality in elderly patients undergoing major digestive surgery is essential and may lead to an efficient specific workup, which constitutes a necessary step to developing a dedicated score for elderly patients.

Is pancreaticoduodenectomy justified in elderly patients?

BACKGROUND

Although mortality & morbidity for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) have improved significantly over the last two decades, the concern for elderly undergoing PD remains. This study examines the outcome of the elderly patients who had pancreaticoduodenectomy in our institution.

METHODS

A prospective database comprising 69 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2001 and May 2008 was analyzed. Using WHO definition, elderly patient is defined as age 65 and above in this study. Two groups of patients were compared [Group 1: Age ≤65 & Group 2: Age >65].

RESULTS

The mean age of our patients was 62 ± 11 years. There were 37 (54%) patients in Group 1 and 32 (46%) patients in Group 2. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of gender and race. However, there were more patients in the Group 2 with >2 comorbidities (p = 0.03). The median duration of operation was significantly longer in Group 2 (550 min vs 471 min, p = 0.04). Morbidity rate in Group 2 was higher (56% vs. 44%, p = 0.04). There was higher proportion of post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in the elderly group (37.5% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.05). Majority of them are Grade A POPF according to the ISG definition. The median post-operative length-of-stay (LOS) in hospital was 9 days longer in Group 2 (p = 0.01). Mortality rate between the 2 groups of patients was comparable (0% vs. 3%, p = 0.28).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients are at increased risk of morbidity in pancreatocoduodenectomy, in particular POPF. However, morbidity and mortality rates are acceptable. It is therefore justified to offer PD to elderly patients who do not have significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities.

p66(Shc) has a pivotal function in impaired liver regeneration in aged mice by a redox-dependent mechanism

Liver regeneration involves complicated processes and is affected by various patho-physiological conditions. This study was designed to examine the molecular mechanisms underlying the aging-associated impairment of liver regeneration. Male C57BL/6J mice were used as young and aged mice (<10 weeks and >20 months old, respectively). These mice were subjected to 70% partial hepatectomy (PH). Liver regeneration and liver injury/stresses were evaluated chronologically after PH. Post-hepatectomy liver regeneration was markedly impaired in aged mice. Though the extent of hepatocyte proliferation in the regenerating liver was similar in aged and young mice, cell growth was absent in aged mice. Oxidative stress (OS) was observed immediately after hepatectomy, followed by marked apoptosis in aged mice. Signaling molecules regarding cell proliferation (mitogen-activated protein kinase, STAT3, p46/52(Shc)) and anti-oxidation (catalase, superoxide dismutase, Ref-1, glutathione peroxidase) were expressed/activated after hepatectomy in livers of both aged and young mice. Akt was not activated in aged-mouse liver, but its expression was similar to that in young mice. p66(Shc), known as an age-/oxidant-associated protein, was strongly phosphorylated. By knocking down p66(Shc), the impairment of liver regeneration was normalized. OS immediately after hepatectomy induced subsequent liver injury (apoptosis), and deletion of p66(Shc) suppressed both OS and hepatocyte apoptosis in the regenerating liver of aged mice. Though we need additional data in other animal models to fully understand the mechanism, p66(Shc) may have a pivotal function in the impairment of liver regeneration in aged mice by triggering OS and subsequent apoptosis. This data may provide a clue to understanding the mechanism underlying the association between aging and the impairment of liver regeneration.

A review of factors predicting perioperative death and early outcome in hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer surgery

OBJECTIVES

In the context of comparisons of surgical outcomes, risk adjustment is the retrospective adjustment of a provider's or a surgeon's results for case mix and/or hospital volume. It allows accurate, meaningful inter-provider comparison. It is therefore an essential component of any audit and quality improvement process. The aim of this study was to review the literature to identify those factors known to affect prognosis in hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer surgery.

METHODS

PubMed was used to identify studies assessing risk in patients undergoing resection surgery, rather than bypass surgery, for hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

In total, 63 and 68 papers, pertaining to 24 609 and 63 654 patients who underwent hepatic or pancreatic resection for malignancy, respectively, were identified. Overall, 22 generic preoperative factors predicting outcome on multivariate analysis, including demographics, blood results, preoperative biliary drainage and co-morbidities, were identified, with tumour characteristics proving disease-specific factors. Operative duration, transfusion, operative extent, vascular resection and additional intra-abdominal procedures were also found to be predictive of early outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of a risk adjustment model will allow for the identification of those factors with most influence on early outcome and will thus identify potential targets for preoperative optimization and allow for the development of a multicentre risk prediction model.

Postoperative suppression of inflammatory cytokines after distal gastrectomy in elderly patients

PURPOSE

Surgical procedures are being performed on elderly people with increasing frequency, but accordingly, postoperative complications and mortality rates are higher than for younger patients. We conducted this study to establish if cytokine responses after distal gastrectomy in elderly patients differ from those in younger patients.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients undergoing distal gastrectomy were divided into two groups based on age: the elderly group consisted of 10 patients aged >/=75 years, and the younger group consisted of 11 patients aged <65 years. Blood samples were collected from the patients preoperatively, and then on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, and 7, for analysis of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors (sTNF-R), and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra); and also to measure TNF-alpha and IL-1beta after incubation with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide.

RESULTS

The IL-6 concentration and TNF-alpha on POD 1 were both significantly lower in the elderly group than in the younger group (P = 0.0058 and P = 0.022, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Cytokine profiles after distal gastrectomy in elderly patients differ from those in younger patients, with lower pro-inflammatory and inflammatory cytokine responses evident in the elderly.

Surgical treatment of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma in elderly patients. When is it worthwhile?

BACKGROUND

The elderly are under-represented in series of patients operated on for colorectal liver metastases (LM).

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the influence of age on surgery of colorectal LM, and the identification of factors that could be used as exclusion criteria.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six hundred and forty-eight patients underwent liver resection between 1990 and 2006. Demographic data, primary tumour related variables, stage of the disease, morbidity, mortality, survival and recurrence were prospectively recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty of 648 patients (25%) were 70 years old or older. Postoperative mortality was significantly higher in elderly patients (8% vs. 3%, p=0.008). Morbidity was also higher (41% vs. 34%, p=0.008). Survival rate at 1, 3 and 5 years was 88%, 62% and 45% respectively in patients younger than 70 years, and 82%, 48% and 36% in the elderly (p=0.007). Excluding the postoperative mortality, the figures were 90%, 64% and 46%. 90%, 53% and 38% (p=0.061). Disease-free survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years excluding postoperative mortality were 68%, 32% and 25% in younger patients, compared to 68%, 34% and 30% (p=0.71) in the elderly. Major liver resections increased mortality in the elderly. In the multivariate analyses only a tumour size equal to or more than 10 cm significantly increased the postoperative mortality risk in elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The elderly have a higher mortality. In recent years that difference has been markedly reduced. Excluding the postoperative mortality, the overall survival and disease-free survival are similar between both groups. The criteria to indicate surgery must be the same in both groups.

Practical questions in liver metastases of colorectal cancer: general principles of treatment

Liver metastases of colorectal cancer are currently treated by multidisciplinary teams using strategies that combine chemotherapy, surgery and ablative techniques. Many patients classically considered non-resectable can now be rescued by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver resection, with similar results to those obtained in initial resections. While many of those patients will recur, repeat resection is a feasible and safe approach if the recurrence is confined to the liver. Several factors that until recently were considered contraindications are now recognized only as adverse prognostic factors and no longer as contraindications for surgery. The current evaluation process to select patients for surgery is no longer focused on what is to be removed but rather on what will remain. The single most important objective is to achieve a complete (R0) resection within the limits of safety in terms of quantity and quality of the remaining liver. An increasing number of patients with synchronous liver metastases are treated by simultaneous resection of the primary and the liver metastatic tumours. Multilobar disease can also be approached by staged procedures that combine neoadjuvant chemotherapy, limited resections in one lobe, embolization or ligation of the contralateral portal vein and a major resection in a second procedure. Extrahepatic disease is no longer a contraindication for surgery provided that an R0 resection can be achieved. A reverse surgical staged approach (liver metastases first, primary second) is another strategy that has appeared recently. Provided that a careful selection is made, elderly patients can also benefit from surgical treatment of liver metastases.