New progress in endoscopic treatment of esophageal diseases

Extraction of Fish Bones Embedded in the Esophagus via Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Two Case Reports and Literature Review

Foreign body ingestion is a common problem encountered at gastroenterology clinics and emergency rooms which can cause serious complications. Usually, foreign bodies are directly visible with flexible endoscopes and can be readily removed. However, when foreign bodies migrate into the deeper tissue of the esophagus, surgery is typically required. There is currently no consensus regarding the best treatment. In this report, we present two cases in which fish bones embedded in the submucosal and muscularis propria of the esophagus were successfully removed via endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Both patients were discharged without any complications.

Clinical Values of Dental Floss Traction Assistance in Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Submucosal Tumors Originating from the Muscularis Propria Layer in the Gastric Fundus

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) derived from endoscopic submucosal dissection has gradually been accepted and even promoted for the treatment of submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria (MP) layer. However, there are some difficulties when EFTR is used to treat MP lesions in the gastric fundus. This study intends to explore whether EFTR can be made simpler, safer, and more effective with the traction assistance of dental floss.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients (trial group) with lesions in the MP layer in the gastric fundus undergoing EFTR with traction assistance of dental floss at Zhongshan Hospital, in 2016, were reviewed retrospectively. The control group was matched with the trial group according to tumor size. The differences in tumor resection time, patient hospitalization time, and complication rate were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the average age of the two groups, each of which comprised 24 cases (58.7 ± 11.8 years versus 56.6 ± 7.9 years, t = 0.663, P = .511). However, there was a statistically significant difference in the operative time between the two groups (10.8 ± 2.8 minutes versus 19.0 ± 4.7 minutes, t = 7.298, P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in the length of the postoperative hospital stay (3.2 ± 0.5 days versus 3.2 ± 0.5 days, t = 0.291, P = .772). In the trial group, there were 19 cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (group 1) and 5 cases of leiomyoma. The control group had similar results. Neither group experienced postoperative delayed bleeding, perforation, or other complications.

CONCLUSIONS

When EFTR is used to treat SMTs originating from the MP in the gastric fundus, dental floss traction assistance can relieve the tumor boundary to simplify the surgical procedure and save the operation time.

Clinical Analysis of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for the Synchronous Multiple Primary Early Cancers in Esophagus and Stomach: 12 Cases Report

OBJECTIVE

With the improvement of endoscopic diagnosis, the discovery rate of the synchronous multiple primary early cancers in esophagus and stomach is gradually increased, while the traditional surgery bringing serious damages. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the first treatment option of early cancer in the digestive tract partly. This study intends to explore the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of ESD in the treatment of the synchronous multiple early gastric cancer or precancerous lesions in the esophagus and stomach.

METHODS

From January 2008 to December 2016, data of 12 patients with early esophageal cancer and early gastric cancer treated by ESD in the Endoscopy Center of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University were reviewed. We analyzed the patient's history, the size of esophageal and gastric lesions, pathological results, the results of complete or curative resection, and so on.

RESULTS

Among the 12 patients described in this study, all were diagnosed with synchronous multiple primary early cancers in the esophagus and stomach. Lesions were removed by ESD in 10 cases at the same time and were removed by stage in 2 cases. The complete resection rate was 100% (24/24), and the curative resection rate was 100% (24/24). Postoperative esophageal stricture occurred in 2 cases, which improved after dilation. Median follow-up time was 30 (8-115) months, when 9 patients survived and 3 patients died. However, the cause of death was not associated with treatment of this disease.

CONCLUSION

ESD is a minimally invasive endoscopic surgery, which can be used as a method of treating synchronous multiple primary early cancers in the esophagus and stomach.

Endoscopic resection of colorectal granular cell tumors

AIM: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of endoscopic resection for the treatment of colorectal granular cell tumors (GCTs).

METHODS: This was a retrospective study performed at a single institution. From January 2008 to April 2015, we examined a total of 11 lesions in 11 patients who were treated by an endoscopic procedure for colorectal GCTs in the Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Either endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed by three surgeons with expertise in endoscopic treatment. The pre- and post-operative condition and follow-up of these patients were evaluated by colonoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS).

RESULTS: Of these 11 lesions, 2 were located in the cecum, 3 were in the ileocecal junction, 5 were in the ascending colon, and 1 was in the rectum. The median maximum diameter of the tumors was 0.81 cm (range 0.4-1.2 cm). The en bloc rate was 100%, and the complete resection rate was 90.9% (10/11). Post-operative pathology in one patient showed a tumor at the cauterization margin. However, during ESD, this lesion was removed en bloc, and no tumor tissue was seen in the wound. No perforations or delayed perforations were observed and emergency surgery was not required for complications. All patients were followed up to May 2015, and none had recurrence, metastasis, or complaints of discomfort.

CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment performed by endoscopists with sufficient experience appears to be feasible and effective for colorectal GCTs.