Clostridium difficile-associated disease: Adherence with current guidelines at a tertiary medical center

Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in community teaching hospital: a retrospective study

Objectives

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is responsible for 15–25% cases of health-care-associated diarrhea. The CDI treatment algorithm used at our hospital is adapted from the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2010 C. difficile guideline. The primary objective of this study was to assess the treatment adherence to our algorithm; this was defined as therapy consisting of the appropriate antibiotic, dose, route, interval, and duration indicated based on the disease severity and episode within 24 h of diagnosis. Furthermore, our study also described the population and their risk factors for CDI at our hospital.

Methods

This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort chart review of CDI cases that were diagnosed at admission or during hospitalization from June 1st, 2017 to June 30th, 2018. Cases were identified by a positive stool test along with watery diarrhea or by colonoscopy.

Results

Sixty cases were included, of which adherence to our algorithm was 50%. Overall, severe CDI had the highest treatment non-adherence (83%), and the biggest contributing factor was prescribing the wrong antibiotic (72%). In severe CDI, which warrants vancomycin monotherapy, wrong antibiotic consisted of metronidazole monotherapy (55%) or dual therapy with metronidazole and vancomycin (45%). Patients were mostly older, females being treated for an initial episode of mild-to-moderate CDI. Common risk factors identified were age over 65 years (80%), use of antibiotics (83%) and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) (68%) within the previous 3 months. The use of a PPI in this study, a modifiable risk factor without a clear indication, was 35%.

Conclusion

An area for antimicrobial stewardship intervention in CDI treatment at our hospital is prescribing the right antibiotic based on the CDI indication. In severe CDI, an emphasis should be on prescribing vancomycin monotherapy as the drug of choice. PPI use should be reassessed for tapering when appropriate.

Review of high dose vancomycin in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend oral vancomycin as first-line therapy for Clostridioides difficile infection. Guideline recommendations vary regarding dosing of vancomycin. Our aim was to summarize the current evidence on the efficacy and adverse effects of high dose oral and vancomycin retention enema (>500 mg/day) for the treatment of C. difficile infection.

METHODS

We searched clinical studies and major guidelines in the English language using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and Embase from 1985 until 15 April 2020.

RESULTS

No evidence supports the use of high dose oral vancomycin in the treatment of severe C. difficile infection. Weak evidence from observational studies supports the use of high dose oral vancomycin in addition to intravenous metronidazole and high dose vancomycin retention enema in fulminant C. difficile infection. Vancomycin retention enema can be used in severe C. difficile infection when oral administration is not possible, or in conditions when the oral formulation cannot reach the colon such as Hartman's pouch, ileostomies, or colon diversions.

CONCLUSIONS

The dosing schedules for oral vancomycin and vancomycin enemas are not clearly defined due to widely varying results in clinical studies. Large, comparative multicenter trials are urgently needed to define the role of high dose vancomycin in C. difficile infection.

Effect of a prospective audit with intervention and feedback on Clostridioides difficile infection management

Background Clostridioides difficile infections are associated with morbidity and mortality in several countries. Their increasing incidence and frequent recurrence make them an urgent public health threat. The lack of adherence to international treatment guidelines for Clostridioides difficile infections is a proven mortality risk factor. Objective To evaluate long-term prescribers' adherence to recommendations on the management of Clostridioides difficile infections and its impact on clinical outcomes after an educational and Clostridioides difficile-prospective audit with intervention and feedback period. Setting All patients admitted to a 1500-bed university hospital with positive Clostridioides difficile tests identified were included. Methods Data were collected retrospectively over a baseline period (May-November 2014) and prospectively over a Clostridioides difficile-prospective audit with intervention and feedback period (November 2015-May 2016) and an observation period (November 2017-September 2018). All Clostridioides difficile cases were reviewed by a Clostridioides difficile-prospective audit with intervention and feedback team composed of pharmacists, an infectious diseases specialist and a microbiologist to obtain a complete overview of patient records in each area of expertise. Main outcome measures Percentage of conformity to the protocol, percentage of recovery at 10 days and percentage of relapse, as well as Clostridioides difficile incidence and percentage of Fidaxomicin use. Results A total of 183 patients were included over the three periods. A significant improvement in conformity to the local protocol was observed between the intervention period (23.9%) and the observation period (67.3%) (P < 10^-3). Fidaxomicin prescriptions increased significantly (P = 0.006). Clinical outcomes improved significantly with an increase in the percentage of recovery at 10 days (P = 0.001) and a decrease in the percentage of relapse (P = 0.016). The Clostridioides difficile incidence rate improved significantly to 1.3 per 10,000 patient-days during the observation period. Conclusion This study shows the lasting effect of an educational and Clostridioides difficile-prospective audit with intervention and feedback period on prescribers' adherence to recommendations and a significant impact on clinical outcomes.

Patient Outcomes With Prevented vs Negative Clostridioides difficile Tests Using a Computerized Clinical Decision Support Tool

Background

Overtesting and overdiagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection are suspected to be common. Reducing inappropriate testing through interventions designed to promote evidence-based diagnostic testing (ie, diagnostic stewardship) may improve C. difficile test utilization. However, the safety of these interventions is not well understood despite the potential risk for missed or delayed diagnoses.

Methods

This retrospective case-control study examined the outcomes of patients admitted to the University of Virginia Medical Center following introduction of a computerized clinical decision support tool without hard-stops designed to reduce inappropriate tests. Outcomes were compared between patients with a prevented C. difficile nucleic acid amplification test and those with a negative result. Chart reviews were performed for patients with a subsequent positive within 7 days, as well as those patients who received C. difficile-active antibiotics after implementation of the computerized clinical decision support tool.

Results

Multivariate analysis of 637 cases (490 negative, 147 prevented) showed that a prevented test was not significantly associated with the primary composite outcome (inpatient mortality or intensive care unit transfer) compared with a negative test (adjusted odds ratio, 0.912; P = .747). Fifty-four of 147 (37%) prevented tests were followed by a completed test within 7 days; 11 of these results were positive, resulting in a potential delay in diagnosis. Individual case reviews found that either clinical changes warranted the delay in testing or no adverse events occurred attributable to C. difficile infection. C. difficile treatment without a positive test was not identified.

Conclusions

Diagnostic stewardship of C. difficile testing using computerized clinical decision support may be both safe and effective for reducing inappropriate inpatient testing.

Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection and Non-compliance with Treatment Guidelines in Adults in 10 US Geographical Locations, 2013-2015

BACKGROUND

Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (IDSA/SHEA) guidelines describe recommended therapy for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI).

OBJECTIVE

To describe CDI treatment and, among those with severe CDI, determine predictors of adherence to the 2010 IDSA/SHEA treatment guidelines.

DESIGN

We analyzed 2013-2015 CDI treatment data collected through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Emerging Infections Program. Generalized linear mixed models were used to identify predictors of guideline-adherent therapy.

PATIENTS

A CDI case was defined as a positive stool specimen in a person aged ≥ 18 years without a positive test in the prior 8 weeks; severe CDI cases were defined as having a white blood cell count ≥ 15,000 cells/μl.

MAIN MEASURES

Prescribing and predictors of guideline-adherent CDI therapy for severe disease.

KEY RESULTS

Of 18,243 cases, 14,257 (78%) were treated with metronidazole, 7683 (42%) with vancomycin, and 313 (2%) with fidaxomicin. The median duration of therapy was 14 (interquartile range, 11-15) days. Severe CDI was identified in 3250 (18%) cases; of 3121 with treatment data available, 1480 (47%) were prescribed guideline-adherent therapy. Among severe CDI cases, hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.90, 3.24), age ≥ 65 years (aOR 1.37; 95% CI 1.10, 1.71), Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 (aOR 1.27; 95% CI 1.04, 1.55), immunosuppressive therapy (aOR 1.21; 95% CI 1.02, 1.42), and inflammatory bowel disease (aOR 1.56; 95% CI 1.13, 2.17) were associated with being prescribed guideline-adherent therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Provider adherence to the 2010 treatment guidelines for severe CDI was low. Although the updated 2017 CDI guidelines, which expand the use of oral vancomycin for all CDI, might improve adherence by removing the need to apply severity criteria, other efforts to improve adherence are likely needed, including educating providers and addressing barriers to prescribing guideline-adherent therapy, particularly in outpatient settings.

Diagnostic stewardship and the 2017 update of the IDSA-SHEA Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection

Diagnostic stewardship is an increasingly recognized means to reduce unnecessary tests and diagnostic errors. As a leading cause of healthcare-associated infection for which accurate laboratory diagnosis remains a challenge, Clostridium difficile offers an ideal opportunity to apply the principles of diagnostic stewardship. The recently updated 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)-Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Clinical Practice Guidelines for C. difficile infection now recommend separate diagnostic strategies depending on whether an institution has adopted diagnostic stewardship in test decision making. IDSA-SHEA endorsement of diagnostic stewardship for C. difficile highlights the increasing role of diagnostic stewardship in hospitals. In this opinion piece, we introduce the concept of diagnostic stewardship by discussing the new IDSA-SHEA diagnostic recommendations for laboratory diagnosis of C. difficile. We outline recent examples of diagnostic stewardship, challenges to implementation, potential downsides and propose future areas of study.

Clostridium difficile: More Challenging than Ever

Clostridium difficile infection is not new, but it is posing more problems than ever before, described by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as an urgent threat. Its pathophysiology allows C difficile to be very difficult to manage, both within the hospital environment and in a patient's body. This article reviews clinical manifestations of the infection, outlines both medical and surgical treatment options, and discusses risk factors and predictors. Implications for nurses are thoroughly described. The epidemic proportion of C difficile infection gives cause for serious concern, especially for vulnerable populations, such as adults over age 65.

Compliance with Clostridium difficile treatment guidelines: effect on patient outcomes

Guidelines for the severity classification and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) were published by Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) in 2010; however, compliance and efficacy of these guidelines has not been widely investigated. This present study assessed compliance with guidelines and its effect on CDI patient outcomes as compared with before these recommendations. A retrospective study included all adult inpatients with an initial episode of CDI treated in a single academic center from January 2009 to August 2014. Patients after guideline publication were compared with patients treated in 2009-2010. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected to stratify for disease severity. Outcome measures included compliance with guidelines, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and surgical intervention for CDI. A total of 1021 patients with CDI were included. Based upon the 2010 guidelines, 42 (28·8%) of 146 patients treated in 2009 would have been considered undertreated, and treatment progressively improved over time, as inadequate treatment decreased to 10·0% (15/148 patients) in 2014 (P = 0·0005). Overall, patient outcomes with guideline-adherent treatment decreased CDI attributable mortality twofold (P = 0·006) and CDI-related LOS by 1·9 days (P = 0·0009) when compared with undertreated patients. Compliance with IDSA/SHEA guidelines was associated with a decreased risk of mortality and LOS in hospitalized patients with CDI.

Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for the management of Clostridium difficile infection in Japan: a multicenter retrospective study

This study was conducted to investigate the adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). A retrospective multicenter observational study was conducted via chart review at four teaching hospitals in Japan from April 2012 through September 2013. CDI was diagnosed based on positive identification of CD toxin by enzyme immunoassay testing. CDI patients were divided into non-severe and severe groups according to the severity criteria of four published guidelines (SHEA/IDSA 2010, ACG 2013, ESCMID 2009, HPA/DH 2008). Three parameters were assessed in association with disease severity: adherence to treatment guidelines, prognosis, and relapse rate. In total, 170 patients were diagnosed with CDI (1.04 cases per 10,000 patient-days). The 30-day all-cause mortality and recurrence rates were 13% and 14%, respectively. CPGs adherence ranged from 52% to 70% in the non-severe group and from 8.5 to 23% in the severe group (P < 0.01). Among severe CDI patients, no significant difference in mortality or recurrence was found between the patients whose treatments adhered and did not adhere to the CPGs. CPGs adherence was low, especially for patients with severe CDI. Improved guideline adherence and more accurate definitions of severity based on prognosis are needed for appropriate CDI management.

Lack of adherence to SHEA-IDSA treatment guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection is associated with increased mortality

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine our institution's compliance with 2010 Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and IDSA Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treatment guidelines and their respective outcomes.

METHODS

We collected clinical parameters, laboratory values, antibiotic therapy and clinical outcomes from the electronic medical records for all patients hospitalized at our institution with a diagnosis of CDI from December 2012 to November 2013. We specifically evaluated whether SHEA-IDSA treatment guidelines were followed and evaluated the associations between guideline adherence and severe outcomes including mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 230 patients with CDI meeting inclusion criteria during the study period. Of these, 124 (54%) were appropriately treated, 46 (20%) were under-treated and 60 (26%) were over-treated. All-cause 90 day mortality was 17.4% overall; 43.5% in the under-treated group versus 12.9% in those appropriately treated (P < 0.0001) and 10.9% in those appropriately treated plus over-treated (P < 0.0001). Similarly, 90 day mortality attributed to CDI was 21.7% in those under-treated versus 8.9% in those appropriately treated (P = 0.03) and 8.2% in those either appropriately treated or over-treated (P = 0.015). Severe-complicated CDI occurred in 46 patients. In this subgroup, there was a non-significant trend towards increased mortality in under-treated patients (56.7%) compared with appropriately treated patients (37.5%, P = 0.35). Under-treatment was also associated with a higher rate of CDI-related ICU transfer (17.4% versus 4.8% in those appropriately treated, P = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to CDI treatment guidelines is associated with improved outcomes especially in those with severe disease. Increased emphasis on provision of appropriate, guideline-based CDI treatment appears warranted.

A Comparison of Current Guidelines of Five International Societies on Clostridium difficile Infection Management

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is increasingly recognized as an emerging healthcare problem of elevated importance. Prevention and treatment strategies are constantly evolving along with the apperance of new scientific evidence and novel treatment methods, which is well-reflected in the differences among consecutive international guidelines. In this article, we summarize and compare current guidelines of five international medical societies on CDI management, and discuss some of the controversial and currently unresolved aspects which should be addressed by future research.

[Identifying gaps between guidelines and clinical practice in Clostridium difficile infection]

OBJECTIVES

The first aim was to determine whether patients are being treated in accordance with the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA/SHEA) Clostridium difficile guidelines and whether adherence impacts patient outcomes. The second aim was to identify specific action items in the guidelines that are not being translated into clinical practice, for their subsequent implementation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted over a 36 month period, on patients with compatible clinical symptoms and positive test for C. difficile toxins A and/or B in stool samples, in an internal medicine department of a tertiary medical centre. Patient demographic and clinical data (outcomes, comorbidity, risk factors) and compliance with guidelines, were examined

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients with C. difficile infection were identified (87 episodes). Stratified by disease severity criteria, 49.3% of patients were mild-moderate, 35.1% severe, and 15.6% severe-complicated. Full adherence with the guidelines was observed in only 40.2% of patients, and was significantly better for mild-moderate (71.0%), than in severe (7.4%) or severe-complicated patients (16.6%) (P<.003). Adherence was significantly associated with clinical cure (57% vs 42%), fewer recurrences (22.2% vs 77.7%), and mortality (25% vs 75%) (P<.01). The stratification of severity of the episode, and the adequacy of antibiotic to clinical severity, need improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall adherence with the guidelines for management of Clostridium difficile infection was poor, especially in severe and severe-complicated patients, being associated with worse clinical outcomes. Educational interventions aimed at improving guideline adherence are warranted.