1
|
Bittner B. Customer-centric product presentations for monoclonal antibodies. AAPS OPEN 2023; 9:3. [PMID: 36713112 PMCID: PMC9869842 DOI: 10.1186/s41120-022-00069-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Delivering customer-centric product presentations for biotherapeutics, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), represents a long-standing and paramount area of engagement for pharmaceutical scientists. Activities include improving experience with the dosing procedure, reducing drug administration-related expenditures, and ultimately shifting parenteral treatments outside of a controlled healthcare institutional setting. In times of increasingly cost-constrained markets and reinforced with the coronavirus pandemic, this discipline of "Product Optimization" in healthcare has gained momentum and changed from a nice-to-have into a must. This review summarizes latest trends in the healthcare ecosystem that inform key strategies for developing customer-centric products, including the availability of a wider array of sustainable drug delivery options and treatment management plans that support dosing in a flexible care setting. Three disease area archetypes with varying degree of implementation of customer-centric concepts are introduced to highlight relevant market differences and similarities. Namely, rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, and oncology have been chosen due to differences in the availability of subcutaneously dosed and ready-to-use self-administration products for mAb medicines and their follow-on biologics. Different launch scenarios are described from a manufacturer's perspective highlighting the necessity of platform approaches. To unfold the full potential of customer-centric care, value-based healthcare provider reimbursement schemes that incentivize the efficiency of care need to be broadly implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beate Bittner
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Global Product Strategy - Product Optimization, Grenzacher Strasse 124, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jacob J, Aintabi D, DeJonckheere M, Cohen-Mekelburg SA, Allen JI, Irani DN, Fendrick AM, Waljee AK, Higgins PDR, Berinstein JA. Inflammatory bowel disease patient concerns and experiences on transition to home-based infusions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Res Social Adm Pharm 2022; 18:4138-4143. [PMID: 35871146 PMCID: PMC9238022 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the CDC issued guidance advising patients and providers to adopt social distancing practices such as home-based infusions (H-BI). METHODS We performed a mixed methods evaluation to summarize perceptions, concerns, and experiences with H-BI among all inflammatory bowel disease patients 18-90 years of age who transitioned to home-based infliximab or vedolizumab infusions between March to July 2020 at a tertiary care center. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using an iterative, inductive thematic approach. Baseline characteristics and outcome on safety, COVID-19 transmission, delays in infusions, and H-BI persistence were collected. RESULTS Of the 57 participants who transitioned to H-BI, 20 (33%) responded. Four major categories and six major themes related to expectations, experience, perceived safety, and logistical factors were identified. Initial perceptions were mixed, however these resolved. One patient developed COVID-19, one patient experienced an adverse event, 12 (21%) patients experienced an infusion delay, and 6 (11%) patients transitioned from H-BI. DISCUSSION Despite mixed initial perceptions, respondents had a positive experience with most respondents planning to continue H-BI after the pandemic resolves. Several real-world actionable barriers were identified related to scheduling, communication between stakeholders, and nursing quality. No major safety concerns were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janson Jacob
- Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Daniel Aintabi
- Department of Medicine, St. Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor Hospital, Ypsilanti, MI, USA
| | - Melissa DeJonckheere
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Shirley A Cohen-Mekelburg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - John I Allen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - David N Irani
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - A Mark Fendrick
- Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Center for Value-Based Insurance Design, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Akbar K Waljee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Peter D R Higgins
- Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Berinstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schultz TJ, Thomas A, Georgiou P, Juaton MS, Cusack L, Simon L, Naidoo K, Webb K, Karnon J, Ravindran J. Home infusions of natalizumab for people with multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomised crossover trial. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2021; 8:1610-1621. [PMID: 34288591 PMCID: PMC8351394 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The delivery of healthcare at home has expanded to intravenous infusions of monoclonal antibodies. A recently developed model of care for home infusions of natalizumab for people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis was evaluated. This pilot study of home infusions of natalizumab and usual care (attendance in a hospital out-patients' clinic) compared safety, feasibility, patient satisfaction, effectiveness and costs. METHODS In this randomised AB/BA crossover trial, 37 adults were randomised to usual care (n = 19) or home infusions (n = 18). After three infusions, patients crossed over to the alternate treatment for another three infusions. Patient safety outcomes and adherence, satisfaction, quality of life, disability and costs were compared. RESULTS No adverse events were recorded from 207 infusions from 35 patients across both home and clinic infusions. There was no difference in adherence (p = 0.71) and infection rates (p = 0.84) between home and clinic settings. Satisfaction with "convenience" of home infusions was significantly greater (p = 0.008) but there were no differences in quality of life measures. Excluding pharmacy, costs were A$74 lower per infusion at home, including A$16 of patients" out-of-pocket costs. INTERPRETATION There were no differences in safety and effectiveness between clinic and home infusions of natalizumab. The home infusions were shown to be feasible, more convenient and less expensive than usual care. Larger scale studies are required to verify these preliminary findings, particularly around safety and management of hypersensitivity adverse events in the home setting and for equivalence of clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J. Schultz
- Adelaide Nursing SchoolUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
- Present address:
Flinders Health and Medical Research InstituteFlinders UniversityAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Anne Thomas
- Post Op Care at Home (Pty Ltd)AdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Paul Georgiou
- Medical Day Treatment UnitRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Mahasen S. Juaton
- Adelaide Nursing SchoolUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Lynette Cusack
- Adelaide Nursing SchoolUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Lorraine Simon
- Medical Day Treatment UnitRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Kerisha Naidoo
- Biogen Australia and New ZealandSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kevin Webb
- Neurology & Stroke UnitRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Jonathan Karnon
- College of Medicine and Public HealthFlinders UniversityAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Janakan Ravindran
- Neurology & Stroke UnitRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Solitano V, Alfarone L, D'Amico F, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S. IBD goes home: from telemedicine to self-administered advanced therapies. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2021; 22:17-29. [PMID: 34116611 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2021.1942833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Major challenges have been posed by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in the routine management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The need for constant monitoring of diseases activity and prompt adjustment of therapy have been balanced with the risk of contagion related to face-to-face consultations. Therefore, digital health initiatives have been pursued for safety reasons as vicarious instruments to avoid overcrowding of the IBD clinics. However, concerns and skepticism about the feasibility of digital health and telemedicine modalities limited their uptake in clinical practice in the pre-pandemic period.Areas covered: We conducted a literature overview on the current state of the art and the potential future benefits deriving from the integration of telemedicine systems, home-based laboratory tests, and self-administered drugs into IBD daily practice.Expert opinion: Digital health and telemedicine approaches at distance have been experimented as effective tools to avoid overcrowding of clinics and reduce risk from SARS-CoV2 exposure. Home-based point of care testing, such as fecal calprotectin and dried blood samples, might represent an effective method of remote monitoring of patients particularly when in-person visits are precluded. High expectations are placed on the use of self-administered advanced therapies, such as new subcutaneous formulation of biologics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Solitano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ludovico Alfarone
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ferdinando D'Amico
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,IBD Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, University Hospital of Nancy, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Silvio Danese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,IBD Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|