1
|
Zhang H, Cao C, Xiong H. Identification of risk factors of EGFR-TKIs primary resistance in lung adenocarcinoma patients and construction of a risk predictive model: a case-control study. Transl Cancer Res 2024; 13:1762-1772. [PMID: 38737684 PMCID: PMC11082657 DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-2172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Background Lung cancer is one of the malignancies with the highest incidence and mortality rates. Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are recommended as the first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, some patients with EGFR-sensitive mutations develop primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs. This study aims to analyze the clinical characteristics of LUAD patients with primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs, identify independent risk factors for primary resistance, and establish a risk predictive model to provide reference for clinical decision-making. Methods We collected data from LUAD patients with EGFR-sensitive mutations (19del/21L858R) who were hospitalized in our institution between 2020 and 2022 and received first-generation EGFR-TKIs with follow-up exceeding 6 months. These patients were categorized into primary resistance and sensitive groups based on treatment outcomes. We compared general clinical data, laboratory tests, and tumor-related characteristics between the two groups, analyzed risk factors for primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs, and constructed a risk predictive model. The model's predictive value was comprehensively assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curves. Results Serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) concentration (P=0.03), serum pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) concentration (P=0.01), and Ki67 expression (P<0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs in LUAD. The combined presence of these three risk factors had the highest predictive value [area under the curve (AUC) =0.975, P<0.001]. We constructed a predictive model for the risk of primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs in LUAD patients, incorporating these three parameters, and represented it through a visually interpretable nomogram. The calibration curve of the nomogram demonstrated its strong predictive ability. Further decision curve analysis indicated the model's clinical utility. Conclusions Based on a single-center retrospective case-control study, we identified serum NSE concentration, ProGRP concentration, and Ki67 expression as independent risk factors for primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs in LUAD patients. We constructed and validated a risk predictive model based on these findings. This predictive model holds promise for clinical application, aiding in the development of personalized treatment strategies and providing a scientific basis for early identification of primary resistance patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Chenlin Cao
- Department of the Second Clinical College, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hua Xiong
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Serum markers change for intraocular metastasis in renal cell carcinoma. Biosci Rep 2021; 41:229708. [PMID: 34467977 PMCID: PMC8438111 DOI: 10.1042/bsr20203116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Renal cell carcinoma is prone to early metastasis. In general, intraocular metastasis (IOM) is not common. In the present study, we studied the relationship between different biochemical indicators and the occurrence of IOM in renal cancer patients, and identified the potential risk factors. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 214 patients with renal cell carcinoma from October 2001 to August 2016 was carried out. The difference and correlation of various indicators between the two groups with or without IOM was analyzed, and binary logistic regression analysis was used to explore the risk factors of IOM in renal cancer patients. The diagnostic value of each independent related factor was calculated according to the receiver operating curve (ROC). Results: The level of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in renal cell carcinoma patients with IOM was significantly higher than that in patients without IOM (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in alkaline phosphatase (ALP), hemoglobin (Hb), serum calcium concentration, α fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA-125 etc. between IOM group and non-IOM (NIOM) group (P>0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that NSE was an independent risk factor for IOM in renal cell carcinoma patients (P<0.05). ROC curve shows that the factor has high accuracy in predicting IOM, and the area under the curve (AUC) is 0.774. The cut-off value of NSE was 49.5 U/l, the sensitivity was 72.2% and the specificity was 80.1%. Conclusion: NSE concentration is a risk factor for IOM in patients with renal cell cancer. If the concentration of NSE in the patient’s body is ≥49.5 U/l, disease monitoring and eye scans should be strengthened.
Collapse
|
3
|
Dong A, Zhang J, Chen X, Ren X, Zhang X. Diagnostic value of ProGRP for small cell lung cancer in different stages. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11:1182-1189. [PMID: 31179060 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.04.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background To investigate the roles of gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) in the diagnosis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 11,206 patients with clinical suspicion of lung cancer from January 1, 2015 to May 31, 2018. ProGRP and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were detected in peripheral blood, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used for analysis. Results ROC indicated that the cutoff values of ProGRP and NSE were 66 ng/L and 18 µg/L respectively, and the diagnosis efficacy of ProGRP was greater than that of NSE (sensitivity: 86.5% vs. 78.8%; specificity: 96.5% vs. 86.3%, respectively) in the diagnosis of SCLC. Moreover, the median level of ProGRP in SCLC increased with the accompanying stages (P<0.001). Further analysis showed that diagnostic efficacy can be improved by using different cutoff values in different stages, but not stage I and II. The cut-off values of ProGRP in the diagnosis of SCLC in stage I-II, III and IV were 56, 71 and 99 ng/L respectively. In addition, the sensitivity (96.6% vs. 95.8% and 98.3% vs. 94.8%) and concordance rate (χ2 =1,526.9 and 988.7, both P<0.001) of detecting SCLC was improved by using different cutoff values compared with the only criteria of ProGRP being ≥66 ng/L in stage III and IV, but not stage I-II. Additionally in stage III and IV, the concordance rates of ProGRP ≥71 ng/L and ProGRP ≥99 ng/L were also higher than ProGRP ≥300 ng/L (both P<0.001), which was conventionally indicated for SCLC. Conclusions ProGRP has significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than NSE in the diagnosis of SCLC. Furthermore, special thresholds for every stage may be more reasonable for the diagnosis of SCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aoran Dong
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, China.,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin 300060, China.,Department of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Jiali Zhang
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, China.,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin 300060, China.,Department of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Xiaobin Chen
- Department of Oncology, the Affiliated Caner Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 45000, China
| | - Xiubao Ren
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, China.,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin 300060, China.,Department of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Xinwei Zhang
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300060, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, China.,Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.,Key Laboratory of Cancer Immunology and Biotherapy, Tianjin 300060, China.,Department of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu Q, Fan J, Xu A, Yao L, Li Y, Wang W, Liang W, Yang F. Distribution of serum neuron-specific enolase and the establishment of a population reference interval in healthy adults. J Clin Lab Anal 2019; 33:e22863. [PMID: 30779465 PMCID: PMC6595301 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Revised: 01/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is an important tumor marker in the serum of patients with lung cancer. Elevated serum NSE levels are also associated with many other diseases. However, there is no unified population reference interval for serum NSE. This study aimed to investigate the distribution of serum NSE in healthy Chinese adults aged 20-79 years and to establish its reference interval in Chinese population. METHODS A total of 10 575 healthy subjects were in line with the requirements of this study. The concentration of serum NSE was detected by a fully automated Cobas e602 analyzer with matching reagents. The population reference interval for serum NSE was established using the unilateral 95th percentile (P95 ) according to standard guidelines. RESULTS The distributions of serum NSE were not significantly different between males and females (P > 0.05) and also did not differ by age (P > 0.05). Therefore, the population reference interval for serum NSE was established as upper limit 25.4 ng/mL (90% confidence interval: 24.5-26.2 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS We established the first population reference interval for serum NSE in a large healthy Chinese adult cohort, which was higher than that recommended by Roche Diagnostics GmbH. This new reference interval is more practical and applicable in Chinese adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Liu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China
| | - Jilong Fan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China
| | - Aiguo Xu
- Department of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China
| | - Li Yao
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China
| | - Wenjun Wang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China
| | - Wei Liang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China
| | - Fumeng Yang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China
| |
Collapse
|