Clinical relevance of occult metastatic cells in the bone marrow of patients with different stages of breast cancer

Tumor reductive therapies and antitumor immunity

Tumor reductive therapy is to reduce tumor burden through direct killing of tumor cells. So far, there is no report on the connection between antitumor immunity and tumor reductive therapies. In the last few years, a new category of cancer treatment, immunotherapy, emerged and they are categorized separately from classic cytotoxic treatments (chemo and radiation therapy). The most prominent examples include cellular therapies (LAK and CAR-T) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1 and CTLA-4). Recent advances in clinical immunotherapy and our understanding of the mechanism behind them revealed that these therapies have a closer relationship with classic cancer treatments than we thought. In many cases, the effectiveness of classic therapies is heavily influenced by the status of the underlying antitumor-immunity. On the other hand, immunotherapies have shown better outcome when combined with tumor reductive therapies, not only due to the combined effects of tumor killing by each therapy but also because of a synergy between the two. Many clinical observations can be explained once we start to look at these classic therapies from an immunity standpoint. We have seen their direct effect on tumor antigen in vivo that they impact antitumor immunity more than we have realized. In turn, antitumor immunity contributes to tumor control and destruction as well. This review will take the immunological view of the classic therapies and summarize historical as well as recent findings in animal and clinical studies to make the argument that most of the cancer treatments exert their ultimate efficacy through antitumor immunity.

Numerical and functional defects of blood dendritic cells in early- and late-stage breast cancer

The generation of antitumour immunity depends on the nature of dendritic cell (DC)-tumour interactions. These have been studied mostly by using in vitro-derived DC which may not reflect the natural biology of DC in vivo. In breast cancer, only one report has compared blood DC at different stages and no longitudinal evaluation has been performed. Here we conducted three cross-sectional and one one-year longitudinal assessments of blood DC in patients with early (stage I/II, n=137) and advanced (stage IV, n=36) disease compared to healthy controls (n=66). Patients with advanced disease exhibit markedly reduced blood DC counts at diagnosis. Patients with early disease show minimally reduced counts at diagnosis but a prolonged period (1 year) of marked DC suppression after tumour resection. While differing in frequency, DC from both patients with early and advanced disease exhibit reduced expression of CD86 and HLA-DR and decreased immunostimulatory capacities. Finally, by comparing a range of clinically available maturation stimuli, we demonstrate that conditioning with soluble CD40L induces the highest level of maturation and improved T-cell priming. We conclude that although circulating DC are compromised by loco-regional and systemic breast cancer, they respond vigorously to ex vivo conditioning, thus enhancing their immunostimulatory capacity and potential for immunotherapy.

Antigenic differences between metastatic cells in bone marrow and primary tumours and the anti-MUC1 humoral immune response induced in breast cancer patients

The dissemination of a malignant neoplasia is a complex process, which requires a set of molecules that remains unknown. It has been suggested that mucins and their carbohydrate-associated antigens may be implicated in tumour spreading which may be also influenced by an anti-MUC1 immune response. In this pilot study, we report the pattern of carbohydrate and peptidic MUC1-associated epitopes on carcinoma cells isolated from bone marrow (BM), taking into account primary tumour histopathologic features. We also bring information about the anti-MUC1 humoral response in these patients. Seventeen patients with invasive breast carcinoma were included. A sample of the primary tumour, a serum sample and a BM aspirate were obtained from each patient. Clinical features studied were tumour size, number of metastatic nodes, histological type and disease stage. Standard immunohistochemistry was performed with antigenic retrieval using different monoclonal antibodies (MAbs): anti carbohydrate antigens: Lewis x (KM380), sLewis x (KM93), Lewis y (C14) and Tn, anti-MUC1 peptide core MAbs: C595, HMFG2 and SM3, anti-cytokeratins, anti-protoncogenes ErbB2 and ErbB3 (IgG) MAbs and also anti-CD34 and anti-CD45 MAbs. ELISA techniques were employed to study circulating MUC1 as well as free and complexed anti-MUC1 antibodies. Immunohistochemical results showed that carbohydrate antigenic expression increases in BM neoplastic cells compared to the original tumours. However, we were not able to demonstrate that a humoral immune response to MUC1 has been induced in these patients. Finally, the employed procedures allow the selective immortalisation of micrometastatic carcinoma cells since short-term cell lines were established.