Role of Panitumumab in the Management of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Translational research of new developments in targeted therapy of colorectal cancer

A severe global health concern is the rising incidence and mortality rate of colorectal cancer (CRC). Chemotherapy, which is typically used to treat CRC, is known to have limited specificity and can have noticeable side effects. A paradigm shift in cancer treatment has been brought about by the development of targeted therapies, which has led to the appearance of pharmacological agents with improved efficacy and decreased toxicity. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and BRAF are among the molecular targets covered in this review that are used in targeted therapy for CRC. The current discussion also covers advancements in targeted therapeutic approaches, such as antibody-drug conjugates, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. A review of the clinical trials and application of these particular therapies in treating CRC is also done. Despite the improvements in targeted therapy for CRC, problems such as drug resistance and patient selection remain to be solved. Despite this, targeted therapies have offered fresh possibilities for identifying and treating CRC, paving the way for the development of personalized medicine and extending the life expectancy and general well-being of CRC patients.

Antibody-Incorporated Nanomedicines for Cancer Therapy

Antibody-based cancer therapy, one of the most significant therapeutic strategies, has achieved considerable success and progress over the past decades. Nevertheless, obstacles including limited tumor penetration, short circulation half-lives, undesired immunogenicity, and off-target side effects remain to be overcome for the antibody-based cancer treatment. Owing to the rapid development of nanotechnology, antibody-containing nanomedicines that have been extensively explored to overcome these obstacles have already demonstrated enhanced anticancer efficacy and clinical translation potential. This review intends to offer an overview of the advancements of antibody-incorporated nanoparticulate systems in cancer treatment, together with the nontrivial challenges faced by these next-generation nanomedicines. Diverse strategies of antibody immobilization, formats of antibodies, types of cancer-associated antigens, and anticancer mechanisms of antibody-containing nanomedicines are provided and discussed in this review, with an emphasis on the latest applications. The current limitations and future research directions on antibody-containing nanomedicines are also discussed from different perspectives to provide new insights into the construction of anticancer nanomedicines.

Successful Treatment with the Fully Human Antibody Panitumumab after a Severe Infusion Reaction with Cetuximab

Aims and background

There are only limited data on the safety and efficacy of panitumumab in patients who experienced severe infusion reactions during cetuximab antibody therapy.

Case report

We report the case of a 69-year-old woman with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer who received single-agent cetuximab treatment but experienced a severe reaction during the first infusion, despite premedication with corticosteroids/antihistamines. Cetuximab was discontinued and treatment with panitumumab initiated approximately 14 days later (without premedication); no infusion reactions occurred and there was a rapid improvement in her general condition. She experienced a partial response that was sustained for 7 months before progression.

Conclusions

This case supports the use of panitumumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer and suggests that panitumumab may be used in some patients with prior infusion reactions to cetuximab.

Panitumumab after Progression on Cetuximab in KRAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: a Single Institution Experience

Aims and background

Few data describe the activity of panitumumab after cetuximab-irinotecan-based regimen failure in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (WT MCRC).

Methods

The aim of this study is to assess if panitumumab has some activity in this setting.

Results

We retrospectively analyzed 25 patients with KRAS WT MCRC who received panitumumab from July 2009 to January 2013 after progression on cetuximab. All patients had previously received cetuximab and irinotecan (20 patients) or oxaliplatin (5 patients). We withdrew cetuximab for intolerance in 4 patients (16%). Twenty-one patients (84%) who had previously responded to cetuximab (overall response rate [ORR] plus stable disease ≥5 months) received panitumumab off-label after progression on cetuximab because they were strongly motivated to continue treatment without chemotherapy. The median number of cycles of panitumumab was 7 (range 1-54). Only 20 patients were evaluable for ORR (5 patients received 1-2 cycles and then died). We observed 1 (5%) partial response, 5 (25%) stable disease, median duration 9 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5 (3-28) and 8 (5-41) months, respectively. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. No patients developed anemia or neutropenia. One patient (4%) developed grade 2 thrombocytopenia, 8 patients (32%) grade 2-3 dry skin or rash, and 2 patients (8%) grade 2 nausea-vomiting (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03).

Conclusions

Our data, with all the limits of a retrospective analysis, show longer PFS and OS as compared to other series in the same setting, demonstrating that panitumumab has treatment effectiveness in patients with KRAS WT MCRC who progressed on prior cetuximab. Further confirmatory prospective studies with a larger series of patients are necessary.

Vascular-targeted TNFα improves tumor blood vessel function and enhances antitumor immunity and chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

Delivery and penetration of chemotherapeutic drugs into neoplasm through the tumor vasculature are essential mechanisms to enhance the efficiency of chemotherapy. "Vascular targeting" strategy focuses on promoting the infiltration of chemotherapeutic drugs into neoplastic tissues. In this study, we achieved a targeted therapy by coupling tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) with TCP-1, a novel vascular-targeting peptide, in an orthotopic colorectal cancer model in mice. High dose of TCP-1-conjugated TNFα (TCP-1/TNFα: 5μg/mouse) displayed potent antitumor activity by inducing apoptosis and reducing microvessel number in tumors than unconjugated TNFα, with no evidence of increased toxicity. In the combined therapy, the antitumor action of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was potentiated when the mice were pretreated with a low dose of TNFα (1ng/mouse) and to a greater extent by the same concentration of TCP-1/TNFα. In this regard, TCP-1/TNFα combined with 5-FU synergistically inhibited the tumor growth, induced apoptosis and reduced cell proliferation. More importantly, TCP-1/TNFα normalized the tumor vasculature and facilitated the infiltration of immune cells to neoplasm as well as attenuated the immunosuppressing effects of TNFα in bone marrow and spleen. At the same time, TCP-1/TNFα significantly improved 5-FU absorption into the tumor mass. Taken together, these findings underscore the therapeutic potential of TCP-1 as a drug carrier in cancer therapy. TCP-1 is a novel vascular-targeting peptide and appears to be a promising agent for drug delivery. TCP-1 fused with TNFα holds great promise for colorectal cancer therapy.

Hypersensitivity and tumor lysis syndrome associated with cetuximab treatment: should we be afraid?

The majority of the chemotherapy agents in use today cause various infusion reactions, from mild flushing to life-threatening events. The frequency of the reported hypersensitivity reactions induced by cetuximab varies between 3% and 22%. It is recommended in the literature to stop the infusion and replace cetuximab with panitumumab in case of hypersensitivity reactions observed during the treatment of colon cancer. Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) may occur in colorectal cancers with heavy tumor load. Tumor lysis syndrome may be life-threatening. In our patient with widespread bone and liver metastases, treatment continued with cetuximab as a combination therapy with irinotecan in spite of the hypersensitivity and TLS led to a complete treatment response. The complete response observed after 3 months through continued therapy in our patient may present an example supporting treatment with cetuximab in spite of severe reactions.

Biologics against cancer-specific receptors - challenges to personalised medicine from early trial results

Understanding molecular mechanisms of tumourigenesis underlies new therapeutic strategies that specifically target tumours. This has led to the evolution of personalised therapy that was first used in breast cancer when hormone receptor status was determined. More recently in colorectal cancer treatment the Epidermal Growth Factor receptor and its tumourigenic role has led to its targeting by using Cetuximab and Panitumumab. Addition of these drugs to existing drug regimes (FOLFOX and FOLFIRI) showed improved respectability rates in patients with liver metastasis. Most recently the Endothelin receptor has been implicated in multiple tumourigenic processes. Interest has grown in using Endothelin A receptor antagonists as adjuvant or combination therapy as suggested by the FOLFERA and FOLFIRI trials currently on-going.

Targeting the tumor microenvironment: focus on angiogenesis

Tumorigenesis is a complex multistep process involving not only genetic and epigenetic changes in the tumor cell but also selective supportive conditions of the deregulated tumor microenvironment. One key compartment of the microenvironment is the vascular niche. The role of angiogenesis in solid tumors but also in hematologic malignancies is now well established. Research on angiogenesis in general, and vascular endothelial growth factor in particular, is a major focus in biomedicine and has led to the clinical approval of several antiangiogenic agents including thalidomide, bevacizumab, sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib, temesirolimus, and everolimus. Indeed, antiangiogenic agents have significantly changed treatment strategies in solid tumors (colorectal cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and breast cancer) and multiple myeloma. Here we illustrate important aspects in the interrelationship between tumor cells and the microenvironment leading to tumor progression, with focus on angiogenesis, and summarize derived targeted therapies.

Adverse events associated with anti-EGFR therapies for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a member of the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases, plays an important role in the control of cell growth and differentiation. Disruption of its signaling leads to neoplastic cell proliferation, migration, stromal invasion, resistance to apoptosis, and angiogenesis.

EGFR is overexpressed in a variety of solid tumors, including colorectal cancer (CRC), and its overexpression is associated with poorer prognosis. One class of agents that is currently used to target EGFR in the treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC) is the monoclonal antibodies. While the monoclonal antibody EGFR inhibitors lack many of the severe side effects commonly observed with cytotoxic chemotherapy, they are associated with a set of unique dermatological toxicities. This paper reviews the safety profile of the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab in the treatment of mCRC.

Safety and efficacy of panitumumab therapy after progression with cetuximab: experience at two institutions

INTRODUCTION

Cetuximab therapy has been effectively combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy in the first-, second-, and third-line treatment settings. In general, treatment with cetuximab is well tolerated, though it has been associated with the development of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). In the case of severe HSRs, further therapy with cetuximab is not possible. In contrast with cetuximab, HSRs have been rarely observed with panitumumab therapy. Currently, panitumumab is indicated for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with progressive refractory disease, and there is recent evidence documenting its clinical efficacy with cytotoxic chemotherapy in the first-line and second-line settings. However, the safety and efficacy of panitumumab after progression with cetuximab has not been well documented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present a retrospective review of our experience in treating 15 patients with mCRC who tolerated panitumumab with clinical benefit after failure on cetuximab therapy from November 2006 through September 2008 at the Yale Cancer Center in New Haven, CT and at the Saint Francis Cancer Treatment Center in Grand Island, NE. KRAS status was retrospectively assessed in patients with readily available tumor tissue.

RESULTS

All 15 patients were treated with a standard dose of panitumumab 6 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. No patient received premedication therapy. Of the 15 patients treated, 4 received only 2 doses of panitumumab but stopped further therapy because of deterioration in performance status. Of the 11 evaluable patients, we noted minor radiographic responses (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) in 3 patients and stable disease (SD) in 3 other patients after 8 weeks of therapy. Five patients had evidence for progressive disease, and further therapy was stopped. The median duration of SD was 4 months (range, 2-8 months). Among the 11 evaluable patients, 1 patient achieved > 50% reduction in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; 112 to 49 U/L), 3 patients had a 25% reduction (59 to 43 U/L, 84 to 61 U/L, and 67 to 42 U/L), and 1 patient had minor reduction in CEA (98 to 83 U/L). All patients tolerated panitumumab well with no occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions. Grade 3/4 toxicities were skin rash in 5 patients and asthenia in 1 patient. The other adverse events observed included grade 1-2 skin rash in 2 patients, grade 2 paronychia in 4 patients, grade 2 hypomagnesemia in 2 patients, and fatigue in 3 patients. One patient had wild-type KRAS, and this individual experienced a minor response to antibody therapy with > 50% reduction in CEA. A second patient was found to have mutant KRAS and, in terms of clinical response, this patient experienced SD for 6 months. The third patient evaluated had mutant KRAS, and this individual was unable to tolerate more than 2 doses and was therefore not evaluable for response.

CONCLUSION

Panitumumab may represent an alternative treatment strategy for patients with refractory mCRC who have experienced failure with standard therapy including cetuximab-based regimens. Our relatively small clinical experience suggests that cetuximab and panitumumab may exert their antitumor activity through different mechanisms; however, further work is required to investigate this potentially interesting issue.

Development trends for human monoclonal antibody therapeutics

Fully human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are a promising and rapidly growing category of targeted therapeutic agents. The first such agents were developed during the 1980s, but none achieved clinical or commercial success. Advances in technology to generate the molecules for study - in particular, transgenic mice and yeast or phage display - renewed interest in the development of human mAbs during the 1990s. In 2002, adalimumab became the first human mAb to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Since then, an additional six human mAbs have received FDA approval: panitumumab, golimumab, canakinumab, ustekinumab, ofatumumab and denosumab. In addition, 3 candidates (raxibacumab, belimumab and ipilimumab) are currently under review by the FDA, 7 are in Phase III studies and 81 are in either Phase I or II studies. Here, we analyse data on 147 human mAbs that have entered clinical study to highlight trends in their development and approval, which may help inform future studies of this class of therapeutic agents.

Toxic effects and their management: daily clinical challenges in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Among the many chemotherapeutic options for metastatic colorectal cancer, none has shown clear superiority in efficacy. All pharmacologic agents in current use have been associated with adverse events. Frequently reported adverse events associated with the chemotherapeutic agents oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and capecitabine include acute and chronic neuropathy, hypersensitivity reactions, diarrhea, neutropenia, and hand-foot syndrome. Although biologic agents are seemingly less toxic, toxic effects can also arise with their use; antiangiogenic agents result in hypertension, and EGFR inhibitors can cause severe hypersensitivity, paronychial infections, and more commonly, dermatologic rash. Furthermore, a correlation has been reported for the efficacy of anti-EGFR agents and development of rash. Data indicate that elderly patients with colorectal cancer who have adequate function and performance status, who may previously have been dissuaded from pursuing active therapy solely on the basis of age, should receive the same treatment as younger patients. To enhance the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, many therapies are administered. Recognition of treatment-emergent toxic effects will, therefore, aid the design and implementation of management strategies that minimize treatment interruption and/or discontinuation, and enhance quality of life for patients.

Clinical Efficacy and Toxicity of Anti-EGFR Therapy in Common Cancers

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a cell surface molecule and member of the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases. Its activation leads to proliferation, antiapoptosis, and metastatic spread, making inhibition of this pathway a compelling target. In recent years, an increasing number of clinical trials in the management of solid malignancies have become available indicating the clinical efficacy of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and oral small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This review addresses frequently used EGFR inhibitors, summarizes clinical efficacy data of these new therapeutic agents, and discusses their associated toxicity and management.

Successful re-challenge with panitumumab in patients who developed hypersensitivity reactions to cetuximab: report of three cases and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are effective in treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Cetuximab, a chimeric MAb targets EGFR. Even with premedication, cetuximab can cause a hypersensitivity reaction (HSR). In case of severe HSR, further therapy with cetuximab is contraindicated, thus preventing these patients from receiving potentially beneficial anti-EGFR therapy. Panitumumab is a fully human MAb also targets EGFR. To date, no human antihuman Ab have been detected, and unlike CET, HSR are infrequent, and no premedication is required. Safety of panitumumab in patients with a previous severe HSR with cetuximab is not fully known. We present three patients with GI cancers who tolerated panitumumab without HSR after experiencing severe HSR to cetuximab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three patients were challenged with standard dose of panitumumab (6 mg/kg) after experiencing grade 3 HSR to standard dose of cetuximab under strict observation and no premedication. First patient, a 58-year-old male with mCRC developed grade 3 HSR during 8th dose of cetuximab. Second patient was a 58-year-old female with mCRC developed grade 3 HSR during 12th dose of cetuximab. Third patient was a 61-year-old male with pancreatic cancer who experienced grade 3 HSR during loading dose of cetuximab. Charts were reviewed to find history of prior allergy, including H1 blocker use, drug allergy, bee sting allergy, eczema, allergic reactive airways disease, or food allergy.

RESULTS

All patients were Caucasians with an average age of 59 year with no history of prior allergy. No patient received any premedication. First patient received panitumumab for 2 months, second patient was treated for 6 months, and third patient who was rechallenged 1 week after HSR to cetuximab had a partial response following 6 months of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

HSR are serious complications associated with MAbs. Thanks to hybridoma technology that newer generations of MAbs contain less or no mouse-specific protein sequences, hence reducing the risk of HSR. Identification of individuals likely to develop severe and sometimes life-threatening HSR is challenging. Our report of three patients successfully treated with panitumumab after they had severe HSR to cetuximab warrant further investigation.

A phase II study to determine the ability of gefitinib to reverse fluoropyrimidine resistance in metastatic colorectal cancer (the INFORM study)

There are data suggesting that inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase signalling may reverse resistance to fluoropyrimidine treatment. To investigate this further, the INFORM study was an open-label, non-comparative phase II study of gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA) 250 mg daily in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU administered as an intravenous 400 mg m⁻² bolus injection followed by 2800 mg m⁻² infusion over 46 h and folinic acid administered as a 350 mg infusion over 2 h) every 2 weeks for up to 12 cycles in 24 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to previous fluoropyrimidine treatment. There were no objective responses. The stable disease rate was 37.5% (95% CI: 18.80, 59.41), median progression-free survival measured 116 days and overall survival was 226 days. Quality of life was unchanged compared to baseline values, and the commonest toxicities were diarrhoea, rash and fatigue with 7 out of 24 (29%) patients having a grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Gefitinib does not sensitise patients with fluoropyrimidine refractory metastatic colorectal cancer to 5-FU chemotherapy.

Treatment with panitumumab after a severe infusion reaction to cetuximab in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report

Monoclonal antibodies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are effective in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Cetuximab is a human-murine chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting the EGFR. Even with premedication, cetuximab can result in an infusion reaction in select patients. In a portion of these patients, the reaction is severe, and further therapy with cetuximab is contraindicated, thus preventing these patients from receiving potentially beneficial anti-EGFR therapy. Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody also targeting the EGFR. Panitumumab is given without premedication and, in clinical trials, has rarely been associated with infusion reactions. It is not yet known whether panitumumab can be safely given in patients with a previous severe reaction to cetuximab. We report a case of a patient successfully treated with panitumumab after the patient had a severe infusion reaction to cetuximab.

Current role of antibody therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

In less than 10 years, the number and importance of non-surgical treatment modalities in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) have increased dramatically, both in the adjuvant and the advanced settings. However, despite the improvement of cytotoxic therapy in CRC, many patients still develop progressive disease and unfortunately in patients with disease resistant to 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, no effective cytotoxic therapy is known. The rapidly expanding knowledge in tumor biology has encouraged optimism for the possibility to find and target tumor-specific mechanisms and thereby increase both efficacy and tolerance. A great number of 'targeted drugs' are being tested in clinical trials and some of these new drugs, like bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab, are available for routine use in health care. These new targeted drugs will expand the therapeutic arsenal in CRC to a great extent, but they will also add to the complexity of treatment of CRC. In this review, we summarize the current status of antibody therapy in patients with CRC.

Comparing ELISA and Surface Plasmon Resonance for Assessing Clinical Immunogenicity of Panitumumab

Evaluation of the immunogenicity of panitumumab, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor mAb approved for use in colorectal cancer patients, led to the development of two separate immunoassays for the detection of anti-panitumumab Abs. The first immunoassay used a bridging ELISA capable of detecting 10 ng/ml positive control anti-panitumumab Ab. The ELISA incorporated an acid dissociation step to reduce drug interference and tolerated the presence of approximately 100-fold molar excess of drug. During eight clinical trials, the ELISA detected developing Ab responses in 2 of 612 (0.3%) subjects. In one of the ELISA positive subjects, neutralizing Abs were detected using an epidermal growth factor receptor phosphorylation bioassay. The second immunoassay used a Biacore biosensor immunoassay format capable of detecting 1 mug/ml positive control Ab while tolerating the presence of equal molar amounts of drug. Although less sensitive and less tolerant to competing drug in the assay, the Biacore assay detected developing Ab responses in 25 of the 604 (4.1%) subjects. Additionally, the Biacore assay identified eight subjects who developed neutralizing Abs. Mouse mAbs with affinities ranging from 1.1 x 10(-6) to 8.4 x 10(-10) M were used to characterize both assay types. The ELISA was more sensitive for the detection of higher affinity mAbs and detected high-affinity mAbs in the presence of higher molar ratio of drug to mAb. The Biacore assay was more sensitive for detection of lower affinity mAbs and detected low affinity Abs in the presence of higher molar ratios of drug to mAb.

EGFR targeting therapies: monoclonal antibodies versus tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Similarities and differences

Current development of targeted therapy in oncology is particularly active and concerns principally two types of agents which are monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathways play a key role in the regulation of cell proliferation, survival and differentiation. Consequently, EGFR is one of the most-studied ligand-receptor systems and specific EGFR inhibition approaches are currently among the most promising and the most advanced in the clinical setting. Cetuximab (Erbitux), belonging to the Mabs family, gefitinib (Iressa) and erlotinib (Tarceva), belonging to the TKIs family, are among the most advanced anti-EGFR drugs at the clinical level. The aim of this review article is to compare at both experimental and clinical levels the key points which govern the activity of these two types of targeting agents.

Panitumumab the first fully human monoclonal antibody: from the bench to the clinic

Panitumumab (formerly known as ABX-EGF) is the first fully human monoclonal antibody to epidermal growth factor receptor to enter clinical trials for the treatment of solid tumors. Like cetuximab (Erbitux; BMS), it is directed against the extracellular ligand-binding domain of the receptor and results in blockade of the essential downstream signaling pathways that are known to govern apoptosis, proliferation and differentiation of both normal and neoplastic cell types in a wide array of tissues. It has a very high affinity for epidermal growth factor receptor and has been generally well tolerated and associated with very few infusion reactions. As a fully human agent, panitumumab has not been associated with the formation of any antibodies directed against it that has been evidenced by a very reliable pharmacokinetic profile with possible dosing schedules ranging from 1 to 3 weeks. Similar to other agents targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway, a rash has been the primary toxicity and is dose dependent up to 2.5 mg/kg at which dose 100% of all patients have been affected. The anti-tumor activity of panitumumab has been tested in vitro and in vivo, and inhibition of tumor growth has been observed in numerous cancer models, particularly lung, kidney and colorectal. It has been efficacious and well tolerated both as monotherapy and in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Several phase I trials, two phase II trials and most recently a phase III trial in pretreated colorectal cancer have been carried out to date. Currently, there is also a randomized phase III trial (Panitumumab Advanced Colorectal Cancer Evaluation Study) investigating the role of panitumumab in the first-line treatment of colorectal cancer. No unfavorable drug-drug interactions have been observed nor has there been any effect on the pharmacokinetics of drugs with which it is being used. Recent progress in preclinical and clinical studies of panitumumab is reviewed.