1
|
Elkhamisy SA, Valentini C, Lattermann A, Radhakrishna G, Künzel LA, Löck S, Troost EGC. Normo- or Hypo-Fractionated Photon or Proton Radiotherapy in the Management of Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3771. [PMID: 37568587 PMCID: PMC10416887 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
LAPC is associated with a poor prognosis and requires a multimodal treatment approach. However, the role of radiation therapy in LAPC treatment remains controversial. This systematic review aimed to explore the role of proton and photon therapy, with varying radiation techniques and fractionation, in treatment outcomes and their respective toxicity profiles. METHODS Clinical studies published from 2012 to 2022 were systematically reviewed using PubMed, MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Cochrane databases. Different radiotherapy-related data were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS A total of 31 studies matched the inclusion criteria. Acute toxicity was less remarkable in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) compared to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT), while in proton beam therapy (PBT) grade 3 or higher acute toxicity was observed more commonly with doses of 67.5 Gy (RBE) or higher. Late toxicity was not reported in most studies; therefore, comparison between groups was not possible. The range of median overall survival (OS) for the CFRT and SBRT groups was 9.3-22.9 months and 8.5-20 months, respectively. For the PBT group, the range of median OS was 18.4-22.3 months. CONCLUSION CFRT and SBRT showed comparable survival outcomes with a more favorable acute toxicity profile for SBRT. PBT is a promising new treatment modality; however, additional clinical studies are needed to support its efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally A. Elkhamisy
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Chiara Valentini
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Annika Lattermann
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Luise A. Künzel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Esther G. C. Troost
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK;
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Okamoto M, Shiba S, Kobayashi D, Miyasaka Y, Okazaki S, Shibuya K, Ohno T. Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy Combined with Concurrent Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Case Series Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2857. [PMID: 37345195 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Systemic chemotherapy has significantly improved in recent years. In this study. the clinical impact of carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (URPC) was evaluated. METHODS Patients with URPC who were treated with CIRT between January 2016 and December 2020 were prospectively registered and analyzed. The major criteria for registration were (1) diagnosed as URPC on imaging; (2) pathologically diagnosed adenocarcinoma; (3) no distant metastasis; (4) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2; (5) tumors without gastrointestinal tract invasion; and (6) available for concurrent chemotherapy. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for more than one year prior to CIRT were excluded. RESULTS Forty-four patients met the inclusion criteria, and thirty-seven received NAC before CIRT. The median follow-up period of living patients was 26.0 (6.0-68.6) months after CIRT. The estimated two-year overall survival, local control, and progression-free survival rates after CIRT were 56.6%, 76.1%, and 29.0%, respectively. The median survival time of all patients was 29.6 months after CIRT and 34.5 months after the initial NAC. CONCLUSION CIRT showed survival benefits for URPC even in the multiagent chemotherapy era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiko Okamoto
- Heavy-Ion Medical Center, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
| | - Shintaro Shiba
- Heavy-Ion Medical Center, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, 1370-1, Okamoto, Kamakura 247-8533, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Daijiro Kobayashi
- Heavy-Ion Medical Center, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
| | - Yuhei Miyasaka
- Heavy-Ion Medical Center, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
| | - Shohei Okazaki
- Heavy-Ion Medical Center, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, 617-1, Takabayashi-nishi, Ota 373-8550, Gunma, Japan
| | - Kei Shibuya
- Heavy-Ion Medical Center, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Heavy-Ion Medical Center, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang C, Tan G, Zhang J, Fan B, Chen Y, Chen D, Yang L, Chen X, Duan Q, Maimaiti F, Du J, Lin Z, Gu J, Luo H. Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Where Do We Go? Front Oncol 2022; 12:828223. [PMID: 35785193 PMCID: PMC9245892 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.828223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been on the rise in recent years; however, its clinical diagnosis and treatment remain challenging. Although surgical resection remains the only chance for long-term patient survival, the likelihood of initial resectability is no higher than 20%. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in PDAC aims to transform the proportion of inoperable PDACs into operable cases and reduce the likelihood of recurrence to improve overall survival. Ongoing phase 3 clinical trial aims to validate the role of NAT in PDAC therapy, including prolongation of survival, increased R0 resection, and a higher proportion of negative lymph nodes. Controversies surrounding the role of NAT in PDAC treatment include applicability to different stages of PDAC, chemotherapy regimens, radiation, duration of treatment, and assessment of effect. This review aims to summarize the current progress and controversies of NAT in PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenqi Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Guang Tan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Bin Fan
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Northwest University (Xi’an No. 1 Hospital), Xi’an, China
| | - Yunlong Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Dan Chen
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Lili Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Xiang Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Qingzhu Duan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Feiliyan Maimaiti
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Jian Du
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Zhikun Lin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Jiangning Gu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- *Correspondence: Haifeng Luo, ; Jiangning Gu,
| | - Haifeng Luo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- *Correspondence: Haifeng Luo, ; Jiangning Gu,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Okamoto M, Shiba S, Okazaki S, Miyasaka Y, Shibuya K, Kiyohara H, Ohno T. Feasibility and Safety of Repeated Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040665. [PMID: 33562274 PMCID: PMC7914638 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Despite the effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (URPC), isolated local recurrence after CIRT is a therapeutic challenge. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a second course of CIRT for locally recurrent URPC in 10 patients. One patient developed grade 3 diarrhea immediately after the second CIRT; no other grade 3 or higher adverse events were induced by CIRT. The estimated 1-year overall survival rate and local control rate after the second CIRT were 48% and 67%, respectively. Repeated CIRT is feasible with acceptable toxicity for selected patients with locally advanced URPC after CIRT. Abstract Purpose: The feasibility and safety of re-irradiation with carbon ion beams for locally recurrent unresectable pancreatic cancer (URPC) after carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) was evaluated. Methods: Medical records from patients with re-irradiated URPC who were treated with CIRT between November 2017 and February 2019 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were (1) isolated local recurrence after CIRT, (2) URPC, and (3) tumor located at least 3 mm from the gastrointestinal tract. The first and second CIRT irradiation doses were 55.2 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 12 fractions. Results: Ten patients met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up period was 25.5 months (range, 16.0–69.1) after the first CIRT and 8.9 months (range, 6.4–18.9) after the second CIRT. The median interval between the initial CIRT and the local recurrence was 15.8 months (range, 8.0–50.1). One patient developed grade 3 diarrhea immediately after the second CIRT; no other grade 3 or higher adverse events were attributed to CIRT. The estimated 1-year overall survival, local control, and progression-free survival rates after the second CIRT were 48%, 67%, and 34%, respectively. Conclusion: Repeated CIRT is feasible with acceptable toxicity for selected patients with locally advanced URPC after CIRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiko Okamoto
- Gunma University Heavy-ion Medical Center, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma 371-0811, Japan; (S.S.); (S.O.); (Y.M.); (K.S.); (T.O.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Shintaro Shiba
- Gunma University Heavy-ion Medical Center, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma 371-0811, Japan; (S.S.); (S.O.); (Y.M.); (K.S.); (T.O.)
| | - Shohei Okazaki
- Gunma University Heavy-ion Medical Center, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma 371-0811, Japan; (S.S.); (S.O.); (Y.M.); (K.S.); (T.O.)
| | - Yuhei Miyasaka
- Gunma University Heavy-ion Medical Center, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma 371-0811, Japan; (S.S.); (S.O.); (Y.M.); (K.S.); (T.O.)
| | - Kei Shibuya
- Gunma University Heavy-ion Medical Center, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma 371-0811, Japan; (S.S.); (S.O.); (Y.M.); (K.S.); (T.O.)
| | - Hiroki Kiyohara
- Japanese Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Gunma 371-0811, Japan;
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Gunma University Heavy-ion Medical Center, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma 371-0811, Japan; (S.S.); (S.O.); (Y.M.); (K.S.); (T.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Concurrent high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: a pilot study. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1017/s146039692000117x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim:
To evaluate the efficacy of concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose (≥55 Gy) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (CCIMRT) in comparison with chemotherapy alone and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) alone for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Methods:
Forty-six patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing CCIMRT (n = 17), chemotherapy alone (n = 16) or IMRT alone (n = 13) were analysed. Overall survival (OS), locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and gastrointestinal toxicities were evaluated. The median radiation dose was 60 Gy (range, 55–60) delivered in a median of 25 fractions (range, 24–30). Gemcitabine (GEM) alone, GEM + S-1, S-1 alone, FOLFIRINOX and GEM + nab-paclitaxel were used in CCIMRT and chemo-monotherapy.
Results:
The 1-year OS rate was 69% in the CCIMRT group, 27% in the chemotherapy group and 38% in the IMRT group (p = 0·12). The 1-year LRPFS rate was 73, 0 and 40% in the 3 groups, respectively (p = 0·012). Acute Grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea, diarrhea) was observed in 12% (2/17) in the CCIMRT group, 25% (4/16) in the chemotherapy group and 7·7% (1/13) in the IMRT group (p = 0·38). Late Grade 3 gastrointestinal bleeding was observed in 6·3% (1/16) in the chemotherapy group.
Conclusion:
High-dose CCIMRT yielded acceptable toxicity and favorable OS and LRPFS.
Collapse
|
6
|
Efficacy and feasibility of proton beam radiotherapy using the simultaneous integrated boost technique for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Sci Rep 2020; 10:21712. [PMID: 33303947 PMCID: PMC7729854 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78875-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and feasibility of proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) using the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), 81 LAPC patients receiving PBT using SIB technique were analyzed. The prescribed doses to planning target volume (PTV)1 and PTV2 were 45 or 50 GyE and 30 GyE in 10 fractions, respectively. Of 81 patients, 18 patients received PBT without upfront and maintenance chemotherapy (group I), 44 received PBT followed by maintenance chemotherapy (group II), and 19 received PBT after upfront chemotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy (n = 16) (group III). The median follow-up time was 19.6 months (range 2.3-57.6 months), and the median overall survival (OS) times of all patients and of those in groups I, II, and III were 19.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.8-21.7 months), 15.3 months (95% CI 12.9-17.7 months), 18.3 months (95% CI 15.9-20.7 months), and 26.1 months (95% CI 17.8-34.3 months), respectively (p = 0.043). Acute and late grade ≥ 3 toxicities related to PBT were not observed. PBT with the SIB technique showed promising OS for LAPC patients with a safe toxicity profile, and intensive combinations of PBT and chemotherapy could improve OS in these patients.
Collapse
|
7
|
Arpa D, Parisi E, Ghigi G, Savini A, Colangione SP, Tontini L, Pieri M, Foca F, Polico R, Tesei A, Sarnelli A, Romeo A. Re-irradiation of recurrent glioblastoma using helical TomoTherapy with simultaneous integrated boost: preliminary considerations of treatment efficacy. Sci Rep 2020; 10:19321. [PMID: 33168845 PMCID: PMC7653937 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75671-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Although there is still no standard treatment for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (rGBM), re-irradiation could be a therapeutic option. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of re-irradiation using helical TomoTherapy (HT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique in patients with rGBM. 24 patients with rGBM underwent HT-SIB. A total dose of 20 Gy was prescribed to the Flair (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) planning tumor volume (PTV) and 25 Gy to the PTV-boost (T1 MRI contrast enhanced area) in 5 daily fractions to the isodose of 67% (maximum dose within the PTV-boost was 37.5 Gy). Toxicity was evaluated by converting the 3D-dose distribution to the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions on a voxel-by-voxel basis. Median follow-up after re-irradiation was 27.8 months (range 1.6-88.5 months). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4 months (95% CI 2.0-7.9 months), while 6-month PFS was 41.7% (95% CI 22.2-60.1 months). Median overall survival following re-irradiation was 10.7 months (95% CI 7.4-16.1 months). There were no cases of re-operation due to early or late toxicity. Our preliminary results suggest that helical TomoTherapy with the proposed SIB technique is a safe and feasible treatment option for patients with rGBM, including those large disease volumes, reducing toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donatella Arpa
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy.
| | - Elisabetta Parisi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Giulia Ghigi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Alessandro Savini
- Medical Physics Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Sarah Pia Colangione
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Luca Tontini
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Martina Pieri
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Flavia Foca
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Rolando Polico
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| | - Anna Tesei
- Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Anna Sarnelli
- Medical Physics Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Antonino Romeo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014, Meldola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abi Jaoude J, Kouzy R, Nguyen ND, Lin D, Noticewala SS, Ludmir EB, Taniguchi CM. Radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Evolving techniques and treatment strategies. Curr Probl Cancer 2020; 44:100607. [PMID: 32471736 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2020.100607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Despite ongoing efforts, patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) continue to have a dismal prognosis. Such tumors are unresectable, and optimal treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy is still not established. While chemotherapy is conventionally aimed at preventing metastatic spread of disease, radiation therapy acts locally, improving local control which can potentially improve overall survival and most importantly quality of life. Here, we aim to review the primary literature assessing the role of diverse radiation therapy strategies for patients with LAPC. Many radiation regimens can be considered, and no standard treatment has demonstrated a clear improvement in clinical outcomes. We advise that the modality of choice be dependent on the availability of equipment, the dose and fractionation of treatment, as well as the dose received by normal tissue. Moreover, a candid discussion with the patient concerning treatment goals is equally as essential. Three notable strategies for LAPC are intensity-modulated radiation therapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and proton. These radiation modalities tend to have improved dose distribution to the target volumes, while minimizing the radiation dose to surrounding normal tissues. Stereotactic body radiation therapy can also be considered in LAPC patients in cases where the tumor does not invade the duodenum or other neighboring structures. Because of the high doses delivered by stereotactic body radiation therapy, proper respiratory and tumor motion management should be implemented to reduce collateral radiation dosing. Despite improved clinical outcomes with modern radiation modalities, evolving techniques, and more accurate planning, future studies remain essential to elucidate the optimal role for radiation therapy among patients with LAPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ramez Kouzy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Daniel Lin
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Ethan B Ludmir
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sapalidis K, Kosmidis C, Funtanidou V, Katsaounis A, Barmpas A, Koimtzis G, Mantalobas S, Alexandrou V, Aidoni Z, Koulouris C, Pavlidis E, Giannakidis D, Surlin V, Pantea S, Strambu V, Constantina RO, Amaniti A, Zarogoulidis P, Mogoantă S, Kesisoglou I, Sardeli C. Update on current pancreatic treatments: from molecular pathways to treatment. J Cancer 2019; 10:5162-5172. [PMID: 31602269 PMCID: PMC6775621 DOI: 10.7150/jca.36300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is still diagnosed at a late stage although we have novel diagnostic tools. Pancreatic cancer chemotherapy treatment resistance is observed and therefore novel treatments are in need. Anti-cancer stem cell therapy, combination of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy with immunotherapy, proteins/enzymes and gene therapy are currently under evaluation. Targeted treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is also administered and novel inhibitors are also under evaluation. In the current review we present recent data from our search within the year 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Sapalidis
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Christoforos Kosmidis
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Varvara Funtanidou
- Anesthesiology Department, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Athanasios Katsaounis
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Amastasios Barmpas
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios Koimtzis
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Stylianos Mantalobas
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vyron Alexandrou
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Zoi Aidoni
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Charilaos Koulouris
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Efstathios Pavlidis
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Giannakidis
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Valeriu Surlin
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Victor Strambu
- General Surgery Department, "Dr Carol Davila", University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucuresti, Romania
| | | | - Aikaterini Amaniti
- Anesthesiology Department, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Paul Zarogoulidis
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Anesthesiology Department, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Stelian Mogoantă
- Department of Pharmacology and Department of Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania
| | - Isaak Kesisoglou
- 3rd Department of Surgery, “AHEPA” University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Chrysanthi Sardeli
- Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|