1
|
Hodgins T, Forde E. A systematic review of prostate bed motion and anisotropic margins in post-prostatectomy external beam radiotherapy. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2024; 32:100287. [PMID: 39555218 PMCID: PMC11567049 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2024] [Revised: 10/04/2024] [Accepted: 10/25/2024] [Indexed: 11/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate bed (PB) motion may lead to geographical miss of the target volume in post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (RT). Optimal clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins prevent geographical miss and unnecessary irradiation of normal tissue. There is little data available informing appropriate CTV to PTV margins in the post-prostatectomy setting. The purpose of this review was to quantify the inter-fraction and intra-fraction motion of the PB and draw a conclusion regarding the use of anisotropic CTV to PTV margins for post-prostatectomy RT treatment. Methodology A search of PubMed and EMBASE databases was carried out using keywords (prostate bed [Title/Abstract]) AND (motion [Title/Abstract]). All study types assessing inter-fraction and/or intra-fraction motion of the PB based on imaging of soft tissue anatomy were included. Data on patient preparation, immobilisation, and image guidance was abstracted from the included studies. Magnitude of PB motion along with the estimated CTV to PTV margins calculated was also tabulated. Quality of studies was assessed using the MINORS tool. Results Seventeen studies were included in the analysis. The largest magnitude of inter-fraction PB motion occurs in the anterior-posterior direction. This motion is attributed to the influence of the bladder and rectal volume on the PB. The PB moves independently of bone and the magnitude of motion varies between the superior and inferior portions of the prostate bed. Conclusion Anisotropic CTV to PTV margins are appropriate for use in the post-prostatectomy setting and their implementation for treatment planning purposes are warranted based on the evidence reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. Hodgins
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity (ARTT), Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity St. James’s Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - E. Forde
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity (ARTT), Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity St. James’s Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Staal FH, Janssen J, Krishnapillai S, Langendijk JA, Both S, Brouwer CL, Aluwini S. Target coverage and organs at risk dose in hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 31:100600. [PMID: 39022396 PMCID: PMC11254181 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Introducing moderately hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy (SRT) following prostatectomy obligates investigation of its effects on clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) doses. This study assessed interfractional volume and dose changes in OARs and CTV in moderately hypofractionated SRT and evaluated the 8-mm planning target volume (PTV) margin. Materials and methods Twenty patients from the PERYTON-trial were included; 10 received conventional SRT (35 × 2 Gy) and 10 hypofractionated SRT (20 × 3 Gy). OARs were delineated on 539 pre-treatment Cone Beam CT (CBCT) scans to compare interfractional OAR volume changes. CTVs for the hypofractionated group were delineated on 199 CBCTs. Dose distributions with 4 and 6 mm PTV margins were generated using voxel-wise minimum robustness evaluation of the original 8-mm PTV plan, and dose changes were assessed. Results Median volume changes for bladder and rectum were -26 % and -10 %, respectively. OAR volume changes were not significantly different between the two treatment schedules. The 8-mm PTV margin ensured optimal coverage for prostate bed and vesicle bed CTV (V95 = 100 % in >97 % fractions). However, bladder V60 <25 % was not achieved in 5 % of fractions, and rectum V60 <5 % was unmet in 33 % of fractions. A 6-mm PTV margin resulted in CTV V95 = 100 % in 92 % of fractions for prostate bed, and in 86 % for vesicle bed CTV. Conclusions Moderately hypofractionated SRT yielded comparable OAR volume changes to conventionally fractionated SRT. Interfractional changes remained acceptable with a PTV margin of 6 mm for prostate bed and 8 mm for vesicle bed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floor H.E. Staal
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jorinde Janssen
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sajee Krishnapillai
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A. Langendijk
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Both
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L. Brouwer
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mantooth SM, Hancock AM, Thompson PM, Varghese P J G, Meritet DM, Vrabel MR, Hu J, Zaharoff DA. Characterization of an Injectable Chitosan Hydrogel for the Tunable, Localized Delivery of Immunotherapeutics. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2024; 10:905-920. [PMID: 38240491 DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Localized delivery of immunotherapeutics within a tumor has the potential to reduce systemic toxicities and improve treatment outcomes in cancer patients. Unfortunately, local retention of therapeutics following intratumoral injection is problematic and is insufficiently considered. Dense tumor architectures and high interstitial pressures rapidly exclude injections of saline and other low-viscosity solutions. Hydrogel-based delivery systems, on the other hand, can resist shear forces that cause tumor leakage and thus stand to improve the local retention of coformulated therapeutics. The goal of the present work was to construct a novel, injectable hydrogel that could be tuned for localized immunotherapy delivery. A chitosan-based hydrogel, called XCSgel, was developed and subsequently characterized. Nuclear magnetic resonance studies were performed to describe the chemical properties of the new entity, while cryo-scanning electron microscopy allowed for visualization of the hydrogel's cross-linked network. Rheology experiments demonstrated that XCSgel was shear-thinning and self-healing. Biocompatibility studies, both in vitro and in vivo, showed that XCSgel was nontoxic and induced transient mild-to-moderate inflammation. Release studies revealed that coformulated immunotherapeutics were released over days to weeks in a charge-dependent manner. Overall, XCSgel displayed several clinically important features, including injectability, biocompatibility, and imageability. Furthermore, the properties of XCSgel could also be controlled to tune the release of coformulated immunotherapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siena M Mantooth
- Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States
| | - Asher M Hancock
- Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States
| | - Peter M Thompson
- Molecular Education, Technology and Research Innovation Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States
- Department of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States
| | - George Varghese P J
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States
| | - Danielle M Meritet
- Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States
| | - Maura R Vrabel
- Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States
| | - Jingjie Hu
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States
| | - David A Zaharoff
- Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pinkawa M, Haddad H, Schlenter M, Hermani H, Ho H, Kovács A, Chao M. Application of a Radiopaque Viscous Hydrogel Spacer for Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: A Prospective Phase 2 Study. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:57-64. [PMID: 37791943 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of a radiopaque viscous spacer (RVS) for prostate cancer radiation therapy (RT), including injection procedure, toxicity, treatment planning, image guidance, and imaging results up to 12 months after RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS RVS (median, 10 mL) was injected between prostate and rectal wall in 30 patients. Cone beam computed tomography (CT) was performed during the course of RT, a magnetic resonance imaging 3 and 12 months after RT. Injection and treatment tolerability were analyzed. The resulting distribution was compared with a control group of 30 patients with an initially fluid spacer. RESULTS Procedure- or device-related adverse events were not observed. Signs of hydrogel migration were not found in any case. The volume decreased by 25% at 3 months after RT, and small residues were detected at 12 months after RT in 3 cases (10%). The median rectal volume percentage within the 90% isodose was 3.0% (interquartile range, 1.5%-4.5%). Acute and late gastrointestinal toxicities were found in 17% and 3%, respectively (all grade 1). The median distance between prostate and rectum at the base/midplane/apex was greater for RVS in comparison to initially fluid spacer (14/12/11 mm vs 12/10/10 mm, respectively), the gel symmetry (right vs left from midline) was comparable. The application was assessed to be easier to control by the users, and visibility in cone beam CT as good. CONCLUSIONS The injection of a radiopaque viscous hydrogel spacer resulted in a prostate-rectum distance of >10 mm in most cases. The resulting rectum volume within the high-dose region and RT toxicity were very low. Advantages in comparison to the conventional hydrogel spacer are predominantly an improved placement control during the injection process and good visibility on CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Hathal Haddad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marsha Schlenter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Horst Hermani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Huong Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Ringwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Attila Kovács
- Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Michael Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Ringwood, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Morgan HE, Wang K, Yan Y, Desai N, Hannan R, Chambers E, Cai B, Lin MH, Sher DJ, Wang J, Wang AZ, Jiang S, Timmerman R, Park CJ, Garant A. Preliminary Evaluation of PTV Margins for Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy of the Prostatic Fossa. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022:S1879-8500(22)00366-6. [PMID: 36509197 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In modern trials, traditional planning target volume (PTV) margins for postoperative prostate radiation therapy have been large (7-10 mm) to account for both daily changes in patient positioning and target deformation. With daily adaptive radiation therapy, these interfractional changes could be minimized, potentially reducing the margins required for treatment and improving adjacent normal-tissue dosimetry. METHODS AND MATERIALS A single-center retrospective study was conducted from March 2021 to November 2021. Patients receiving conventionally fractionated postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for prostate cancer with pretreatment and posttreatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging (pre-CBCT and post-CBCT, respectively) were included (248 paired images). Pretreatment and posttreatment clinical target volumes (pre-CTVs and post-CTVs) were contoured by a single observer on all CBCTs and verified by a second observer. Motion was calculated from pre-CTV to that of the post-CTV, and predicted margins were calculated with van Herk's formula. Adequate coverage of the proposed planning target volume (PTV) margin expansions (pre-PTV) were verified by determining overlap with post-CTV. In a smaller cohort (25 paired images), dosimetric changes with the proposed online adaptive margins were compared with conventional plans in the Ethos emulator environment. RESULTS The estimated margins predicted to achieve ≥95% CTV coverage for 90% of the population were 1.6 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.2 mm (x-, y-, and z -xes, respectively), with 95% of the absolute region of interest displacement being within 1.9 mm, 2.8 mm, and 2.1 mm. After symmetrically expanding all pre-CTVs by 3 mm, the percentage of paired images achieving ≥95% CTV coverage was 97.1%. When comparing adaptive plans (3-mm margins) with scheduled plans (7-mm margins), rectum dosimetry significantly improved, with an average relative reduction in V40Gy[cc] of 59.2% and V65Gy[cc] of 79.5% (where V40Gy and V65Gy are defined as the volumes receiving 40 Gy and 65 Gy or higher dose, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Online daily adaptive radiation therapy could significantly decrease PTV margins for prostatic PORT and improve rectal dosimetry, with a symmetrical expansion of 3 mm achieving excellent coverage in this cohort. These results need to be validated in a larger prospective cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard E Morgan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, CARTI Cancer Center, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yulong Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Neil Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Eric Chambers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Bin Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Mu-Han Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - David J Sher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Andrew Z Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Steve Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Chunjoo Justin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida.
| | - Aurelie Garant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Williams ISC, McVey A, Perera S, O’Brien JS, Kostos L, Chen K, Siva S, Azad AA, Murphy DG, Kasivisvanathan V, Lawrentschuk N, Frydenberg M. Modern paradigms for prostate cancer detection and management. Med J Aust 2022; 217:424-433. [PMID: 36183329 PMCID: PMC9828197 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Early detection and management of prostate cancer has evolved over the past decade, with a focus now on harm minimisation and reducing overdiagnosis and overtreatment, given the proven improvements in survival from randomised controlled trials. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is now an important aspect of the diagnostic pathway in prostate cancer, improving the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, enabling accurate localisation of appropriate sites to biopsy, and reducing unnecessary biopsies in most patients with normal magnetic resonance imaging scans. Biopsies are now performed transperineally, substantially reducing the risk of post-procedure sepsis. Australian-led research has shown that prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has superior accuracy in the staging of prostate cancer than conventional imaging (CT and whole-body bone scan). Localised prostate cancer that is low risk (International Society for Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade 1, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6; and ISUP grade group 2, Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 with less than 10% pattern 4) can be offered active surveillance, reducing harms from overtreatment. Prostatectomy and definitive radiation remain the gold standard for localised intermediate and high risk disease. However, focal therapy is an emerging experimental treatment modality in Australia in carefully selected patients. The management of advanced prostate cancer treatment has evolved to now include several novel agents both in the metastatic hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant disease settings. Multimodal therapy with androgen deprivation therapy, additional systemic therapy and radiotherapy are often recommended. PSMA-based radioligand therapy has emerged as a treatment option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and is currently being evaluated in earlier disease states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jonathan S O’Brien
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVIC,University of MelbourneMelbourneVIC
| | | | - Kenneth Chen
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVIC,Singapore General HospitalSingaporeSingapore
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVIC,University of MelbourneMelbourneVIC
| | - Arun A Azad
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVIC,University of MelbourneMelbourneVIC
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVIC,University College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVIC,University College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Mark Frydenberg
- Monash UniversityMelbourneVIC,Cabrini Institute, Cabrini HealthMelbourneVIC
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Feng Z, Hooshangnejad H, Shin EJ, Narang A, Lediju Bell MA, Ding K. The Feasibility of Haar Feature-Based Endoscopic Ultrasound Probe Tracking for Implanting Hydrogel Spacer in Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:759811. [PMID: 34804959 PMCID: PMC8599366 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.759811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose We proposed a Haar feature-based method for tracking endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) probe in diagnostic computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans for guiding hydrogel injection without external tracking hardware. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing our method with phantom and patient images. Materials and Methods Our methods included the pre-simulation section and Haar features extraction steps. Firstly, the simulated EUS set was generated based on anatomic information of interpolated CT/MRI images. Secondly, the efficient Haar features were extracted from simulated EUS images to create a Haar feature dictionary. The relative EUS probe position was estimated by searching the best matched Haar feature vector of the dictionary with Haar feature vector of target EUS images. The utilization of this method was validated using EUS phantom and patient CT/MRI images. Results In the phantom experiment, we showed that our Haar feature-based EUS probe tracking method can find the best matched simulated EUS image from a simulated EUS dictionary which includes 123 simulated images. The errors of all four target points between the real EUS image and the best matched EUS images were within 1 mm. In the patient CT/MRI scans, the best matched simulated EUS image was selected by our method accurately, thereby confirming the probe location. However, when applying our method in MRI images, our method is not always robust due to the low image resolution. Conclusions Our Haar feature-based method is capable to find the best matched simulated EUS image from the dictionary. We demonstrated the feasibility of our method for tracking EUS probe without external tracking hardware, thereby guiding the hydrogel injection between the head of the pancreas and duodenum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziwei Feng
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Hamed Hooshangnejad
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Eun Ji Shin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Amol Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Muyinatu A Lediju Bell
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kai Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lim Joon D, Berlangieri A, Harris B, Tacey M, O'Meara R, Pitt B, Viotto A, Brown K, Schneider M, Lawrentschuk N, Sengupta S, Berry C, Jenkins T, Chao M, Wada M, Foroudi F, Khoo V. Exploratory models comparing ethiodized oil-glue and gold fiducials for bladder radiotherapy image-guidance. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2021; 17:77-83. [PMID: 33898783 PMCID: PMC8058020 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose Image-guidance with fiducials has been shown to improve pelvic radiotherapy outcome. However, bladder fiducials using ethiodized oil (EO) alone can disperse widely, and gold causes Computed Tomography scan (CT) metal artifacts. The study's purpose was to investigate the ability to deliver EO-tissue glue fiducials and compare them to gold for bladder radiotherapy image guidance. Materials and methods A fluid-filled porcine bladder model was used to assess the ability to cystoscopically inject visible EO glue fiducials into the submucosa. We then transferred the bladders into a porcine pelvis for imaging and compared them to gold fiducials using CT, Cone Beam CT (CBCT), and kilovoltage (KV) planar views. A tissue-equivalent phantom was utilized to analyze the CT number Hounsfield Unit (HU) characteristics and artifacts of the glue and gold fiducials. Percentile ranges and normal tissue voxel percentages of the subsequent CT number voxel histogram from a 2 cm sphere surrounding the fiducial was used to characterize the artifact. Results We successfully delivered all EO glue fiducials into the porcine bladders as discrete fiducials. They were well seen on CT, CBCT, and KV imaging. The glue fiducials had lower CT number values, but less CT number spread of the voxel percentile ranges consistent with the diminished contrast and less artifact than gold. The glue fiducial types had similar CT number characteristics. Conclusion This study has shown that EO glue fiducials can be delivered with online visualization qualities comparable to gold fiducials without metal-related artifacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl Lim Joon
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia.,Monash University, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Wellington Rd, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
| | - Alexandra Berlangieri
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Benjamin Harris
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Mark Tacey
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Rachel O'Meara
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Brent Pitt
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Angela Viotto
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Kerryn Brown
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Michal Schneider
- Monash University, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Wellington Rd, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Shomik Sengupta
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Colleen Berry
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Trish Jenkins
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Michael Chao
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Morikatsu Wada
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Farshad Foroudi
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia.,Monash University, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Wellington Rd, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.,Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 203 Fulham Rd, Chelsea, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Braide K, Kindblom J, Lindencrona U, Hugosson J, Pettersson N. Salvage radiation therapy in prostate cancer: relationship between rectal dose and long-term, self-reported rectal bleeding. Clin Transl Oncol 2020; 23:397-404. [PMID: 32621207 PMCID: PMC7854429 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02433-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To quantify the relationship between the rectal dose distribution and the prevalence of self-reported rectal bleeding among men treated with salvage radiotherapy (ST) delivered by three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for prostate cancer. To use this relationship to estimate the risk of rectal bleeding for a contemporary cohort of patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) ST. Methods and patients Rectal bleeding of any grade was reported by 56 (22%) of 255 men in a PROM-survey at a median follow-up of 6.7 years after 3DCRT ST. Treatment plan data were extracted and dose–response relationships for the rectal volumes receiving at least 35 Gy (V35Gy) or 63 Gy (V63Gy) were calculated with logistic regression. These relationships were used to estimate the risk of rectal bleeding for a cohort of 253 patients treated with VMAT ST. Results In the dose–response analysis of patients in the 3DCRT ST cohort, both rectal V35Gy and V63Gy were statistically significant parameters in univariable analysis (p = 0.005 and 0.003, respectively). For the dose–response models using either rectal V35Gy or V63Gy, the average calculated risk of rectal bleeding was 14% among men treated with VMAT ST compared to a reported prevalence of 22% for men treated with 3DCRT ST. Conclusions We identified dose–response relationships between the rectal dose distribution and the risk of self-reported rectal bleeding of any grade in a long-term perspective for men treated with 3DCRT ST. Furthermore, VMAT ST may have the potential to decrease the prevalence of late rectal bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Braide
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - J Kindblom
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - U Lindencrona
- Department of Radiation Physics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - J Hugosson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - N Pettersson
- Department of Radiation Physics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Anderson EM, Park K, Lu DJ, Nissen N, Gong J, Hendifar A, Gangi A, Lo S, Kamrava M, Atkins KM. A radiopaque polymer hydrogel as an irreversible electroporation compatible fiducial marker for pancreas stereotactic body radiotherapy. JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT 2020; 7:165-167. [PMID: 33282470 PMCID: PMC7717092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eric M Anderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Kenneth Park
- Department of Interventional Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Diana J Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Nicholas Nissen
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Jun Gong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Andrew Hendifar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Alexandra Gangi
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Simon Lo
- Department of Interventional Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Katelyn M Atkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| |
Collapse
|