Real-world outcome of universal screening for Lynch syndrome in Japanese patients with colorectal cancer highlights the importance of targeting patients with young-onset disease

Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Implications of Genomic Medicine and Precision Oncology

Approximately 10% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases occur in the context of hereditary cancer-predisposing conditions caused by germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in cancer predisposition genes, with Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis at the top of the list. Although the identification of hereditary CRC has traditionally relied on clinical characteristics, including familial accumulation, multiple and early onset of CRC and other related cancers, and the presence of gastrointestinal polyposis, more comprehensive approaches, such as universal tumor screening and universal germline testing, have recently been employed. From a technical standpoint, next-generation sequencing has enabled genome-wide analysis of genetic alterations in germline and somatic settings. Taking advantage of this technology, germline multigene panel testing has been utilized in genetic testing, which leads to the identification of PVs, not only in well-known hereditary CRC genes but also in rare causal genes, moderate-risk genes, and high-risk genes previously not linked to CRC predisposition. In addition, comprehensive genomic profiling and companion diagnostics for solid tumors occasionally yield unexpected hereditary CRC diagnoses. Thus, more hereditary CRCs have been identified not based on clinical phenotypes but rather by comprehensive approaches or as secondary findings of treatment drug testing. In this review, we discuss the impact of recent advances in genomic medicine on the clinical aspects of hereditary CRC, which has promoted an understanding of the entire landscape of genetic predisposition to CRC.

Lynch syndrome screening in patients with young-onset extra-colorectal Lynch syndrome-associated cancers

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary cancer syndrome caused by pathogenic germline variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, which predisposes to various types of cancers showing deficient MMR (dMMR). Identification of LS probands is crucial to reduce cancer-related deaths in affected families. Although universal screening is recommended for colorectal and endometrial cancers, and age-restricted screening is proposed as an alternative, LS screening covering a broader spectrum of cancer types is needed. In the current study, we elucidated the rate of dMMR tumors and evaluated the outcome of LS screening in young-onset extra-colorectal LS-associated cancers.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins were retrospectively performed in a total of 309 tissue samples of endometrial, non-mucinous ovarian, gastric, urothelial, pancreatic, biliary tract, and adrenal cancers in patients < 50 years of age. Clinicopathological information and the results of genetic testing were obtained from medical charts.

RESULTS

There were 24 dMMR tumors (7.8%) including 18 endometrial, three ovarian, two urothelial, and one gastric cancer. Co-occurrence of colorectal cancer and family history of LS-associated cancers was significantly enriched in patients with dMMR tumors. Among the 16 patients with dMMR tumors who were informed of the immunohistochemistry results, five with endometrial and one with urothelial cancer were diagnosed as LS with positive pathogenic variants in MMR genes.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the outcome of immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins performed in multiple types of young-onset extra-colorectal LS-associated cancers. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of a comprehensive LS screening program incorporating young-onset patients with various types of extra-colorectal LS-associated cancers.

Universal screening of colorectal tumors for lynch syndrome: a survey of patient experiences and opinions

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome represents the most common hereditary cause of both colorectal and endometrial cancer. It is caused by defects in mismatch repair genes, as well as EPCAM. Universal screening of colon tumors for Lynch syndrome via microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) can identify patients and families at risk to develop further cancers and potentially impact surveillance and treatment options. The approach to implementation of universal screening, taking ethical considerations into account, is critical to its effectiveness, with patient perspectives providing valuable insight.

METHODS

Patients whose colon tumors underwent universal screening at Penn State Hershey Medical Center over a period of 2.5 years were mailed a survey on universal screening in 2017. Along with the survey, they received a recruitment letter and a summary explanation of research. The survey included both multiple choice and free-response questions that covered topics including respondent knowledge of Lynch syndrome, attitudes toward universal screening and experiences with the screening protocol as implemented.

RESULTS

Sixty-six of 297 possible patients (22.2%) responded to the survey, including 13 whose screening results raised concern for Lynch syndrome. 75.8% of respondents supported universal tumor screening without informed consent. 92.4% preferred receiving screening results regardless of outcome. Respondents described benefits to screening for themselves and their families.

CONCLUSIONS

While broadly supporting universal tumor screening without informed consent, respondents also wanted more information shared about the screening policy, as well as their results. These patient preferences should be one of many factors considered when implementing universal screening and can also inform practices regarding both tumor profiling and universal genetic testing, which is becoming more prevalent.

Prevalence and characteristics of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma having potential Lynch syndrome identified by immunohistochemical universal screening and Amsterdam criteria II

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) having potential Lynch syndrome (pLS) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of DNA mismatch repair gene-related proteins (MMRPs) and Amsterdam criteria II and explore their clinical characteristics.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 150 consecutive patients with UTUC who underwent surgical resection at our institution between February 2012 and December 2020, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) of four MMRPs (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) on all UTUC specimens was performed. Patients who tested positive for Amsterdam criteria (AMS) II and/or IHC screening were classified as having pLS and others as non-pLS, and their characteristics were explored.

RESULTS

In this study, 5 (3%) and 6 (4%) patients were positive for AMS II and IHC screening, respectively. Two patient were positive for both AMS II and IHC screening, resulting in 9 (6%) patients with pLS. The pLS group was predominantly female (67% vs. 36%; p = 0.0093) and had more right-sided tumors (100% vs. 43%; p = 0.0009) than the non-pLS group. Of the 6 patients who were positive for IHC screening, 4 showed a combined loss of MSH2/MSH6 (n = 3) and MLH1/PMS2 (n = 1). Other two patients showed single loss of MSH6 and PSM2.

CONCLUSIONS

AMS II and IHC screening identified pLS in 6% of patients with UTUC. The IHC screening-positive group tends to have relatively high rate of combined loss, but some patients have single loss. AMS II may overlook patients with LS, and a universal screening may be required for patients with UTUC as well as those with colorectal and endometrial cancer.

Using a multistep approach with multidisciplinary team to increase the diagnosis rate of Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer after universal screening: a single-center study in Japan

BACKGROUNDS

This study aimed to evaluate the changes in the rates of genetic counseling and genetic testing as well as the diagnosis rate of Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated colorectal cancer before and after multistep approach with multidisciplinary team in Japanese.

METHODS

In September 2016, we started universal screening for LS by mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry and prospectively collected the records. Following patient interviews, we started multistep approach with multidisciplinary team (MA) in January 2020. MA consists of six surgeons, one genetic counselor, one medical geneticist, and six pathologists. MA is set up to compensate for patients' lack of knowledge about genetic diseases and make case selection for elderly colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR). MA is designed as a system that could be performed by a small number of medical genetic specialists. A total of 522 patients were included during the study duration, 323 and 199 patients in the pre-MA (P-MA) and MA groups, respectively.

RESULTS

The frequency of dMMR in all patients was 10.0%. The patient interview results indicated a significant lack of patient education regarding genetic diseases. The rates of genetic counseling and genetic testing was significantly higher in MA group than in P-MA group (genetic counseling: MA 34.6% vs. P-MA 7.7%, p = 0.04; genetic testing: MA 30.8% vs. P-MA 3.8%, p = 0.02). Moreover, the diagnosis rate of LS-associated colorectal cancer was significantly higher in MA group (2.5%) than in P-MA group (0.3%) (P = 0.03). In addition, MA could be performed without problems despite the small number of medical and human genetics specialists.

CONCLUSIONS

MA has achieved appropriate pickup of suspected hereditary colorectal cancer patients and complemented the lack of knowledge about genetic diseases. The introduction of MA increased LS-associated colorectal cancer after universal screening. MA is an appropriate LS screening protocol for Japanese patients who lag behind in medical and human genetics education.

Impact of Institutional Universal Microsatellite-Instability (MSI) Reflex Testing on Molecular Profiling Differences Between Younger and Older Patients with Colorectal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC) is found in about 15% of early-stage diseases and 5% of metastatic diseases. We reviewed a large, single-institutional database after implementation of universal reflex dMMR/MSI-H testing in CRC to compare profiles of younger (≤50) and older (>50) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2009 and 2017, all patients diagnosed with CRC at the University of Florida underwent reflex somatic tumor testing for dMMR by immunohistochemistry (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6), MSI by PCR, and Next-Generation Sequencing. Statistical analysis was conducted with 2-sample comparison tests and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

There were 375 patients included in the final analysis. Patients were grouped as younger (ages ≤50 years-old; n = 80) or older (>50 years-old; n = 295). Compared to tumors from older patients, tumors from younger patients were less likely to be dMMR/MSI-H (12.5% vs. 21.4%, P = .013) and less likely to have a BRAF mutation (1.5% vs. 16.1%, P = .002). BRAF mutation status was highly associated with MMR status; BRAF-mutated tumors were 29.7 times more likely than BRAF-WT tumors to be dMMR/MSI-H (P = < .001, 95% CI 11.3-78.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumors of younger patients were less likely than tumors of older patients to have a dMMR/MSI-H or BRAF mutation. Universal MMR/MSI testing in our dataset identified a relatively large population of older patients with sporadic CRC who were eligible for immunotherapy.

Clinicopathological characteristics of high microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer: A narrative review

Colorectal cancers (CRCs) with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) show molecular and clinicopathological characteristics that differ from those of proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable CRCs. Despite the importance of MSI-H/dMMR status in clinical decision making, the testing rates for MSI and MMR in clinical practice remain low, even in high-risk populations. Additionally, the real-world prevalence of MSI-H/dMMR CRC may be lower than that reported in the literature. Insufficient MSI and MMR testing fails to identify patients with MSI-H/dMMR CRC, who could benefit from immunotherapy. In this article, we describe the current knowledge of the clinicopathological features, molecular landscape, and radiomic characteristics of MSI-H/dMMR CRCs. A better understanding of the importance of MMR/MSI status in the clinical characteristics and prognosis of CRC may help increase the rates of MMR/MSI testing and guide the development of more effective therapies based on the unique features of these tumors.

Clinicopathological and molecular characterization of deficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer

Tumors demonstrating deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) account for 12%-15% of colorectal cancers (CRCs), but their characteristics have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to characterize dMMR CRCs in terms of clinicopathological findings and molecular alterations. Immunostaining for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins was performed to determine MMR status, and then MLH1 promoter methylation and genetic variants of 25 genes involved in colorectal carcinogenesis were analyzed by next-generation sequencing in dMMR tumors. Coexistence of precancerous lesions was histologically evaluated to characterize the type of precursors. Immunohistochemistry revealed 34 dMMR tumors in 492 CRCs. Among dMMR CRCs, there were 25 MLH1 methylation-positive, 16 BRAF V600E variant-positive, and 7 KRAS variant-positive tumors. Positive MLH1 methylation was associated with BRAF V600E, older age, and right-side tumor location. MLH1 methylated BRAF/KRAS wild-type tumors were distinct in that all 5 tumors possessed variants in ligand-independent WNT signaling genes including APC, AXIN2, and CTNNB1. Among 10 dMMR CRCs that presented with precancerous lesions, 4 BRAF variant-positive, 1 KRAS variant-positive, and 2 BRAF/KRAS wild-type MLH1 methylated tumors coexisted with serrated lesions, whereas 1 MLH1 methylated BRAF/KRAS wild-type tumor and 2 MLH1 unmethylated tumors accompanied conventional adenomas. The present study characterized distinct subgroups of dMMR CRCs based on molecular alterations including MLH1 methylation and variants in BRAF, KRAS, and ligand-independent WNT signaling genes. The existence of distinct precursor lesions including serrated lesion and conventional adenoma further illustrates the involvement of heterogeneous carcinogenetic pathways in the development of dMMR CRCs.