Development of outcome measures for large-vessel vasculitis for use in clinical trials: opportunities, challenges, and research agenda

Establishing clinical remission criteria for giant cell arteritis: Results of a Delphi exercise carried out by an expert panel of the Japan Research Committee of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare for Intractable Vasculitis

OBJECTIVE

To develop a proposal for giant cell arteritis remission criteria in order to implement a treat-to-target algorithm.

METHODS

A task force consisting of 10 rheumatologists, 3 cardiologists, 1 nephrologist, and 1 cardiac surgeon was established in the Large-vessel Vasculitis Group of the Japanese Research Committee of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for Intractable Vasculitis to conduct a Delphi survey of remission criteria for giant cell arteritis. The survey was circulated among the members over four reiterations with four face-to-face meetings. Items with a mean score of ≥4 were extracted as items for defining remission criteria.

RESULTS

An initial literature review yielded a total of 117 candidate items for disease activity domains and treatment/comorbidity domains of remission criteria, of which 35 were extracted as disease activity domains (systematic symptoms, signs and symptoms of cranial and large-vessel area, inflammatory markers, and imaging findings). For the treatment/comorbidity domain, ≤5 mg/day of prednisolone 1 year after starting glucocorticoids was extracted. The definition of achievement of remission was the disappearance of active disease in the disease activity domain, normalization of inflammatory markers, and ≤5 mg/day of prednisolone.

CONCLUSION

We developed proposals for remission criteria to guide the implementation of a treat-to-target algorithm for giant cell arteritis.

Development of outcome measures for giant cell arteritis for use in clinical trials and standard practice

BACKGROUND

Developments in outcome measures in the rheumatic diseases are promoted by the development of successful treatments. Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a multifaceted disorder and, therefore, measurement of multiple outcomes is relevant to this illness. It is a privilege to analyze and monitor/transfer long-term patients' management outcomes particularly if the same outcomes are used in practice and in trials.

OBJECTIVE

To classify the outcome measures for GCA with a discriminative ability to identify the disease activity status and response to therapy.

METHODS

This study was composed of two steps, instrument design (item generation) and judgmental evidence. A panel of 13 experts was used to validate the instrument through quantitative (content validity) and qualitative (cognitive interviewing) methods. Content validity index was used to assess content validity quantitatively.

RESULTS

Five items achieved high content validity where item-content validity index score was >0.79, and in the meantime achieved high content validity response score reflecting greater agreement among panel members. Through qualitative methods, items were improved until saturation was achieved. This agreed with the expert panel ranking of the items included in GCA disease outcome measures set.

CONCLUSION

For daily clinical practice, outcome measures should reflect the patients' disease activity status and have to be easily assessed and recorded. The study identified composite outcome measures for GCA able to assess the disease state and monitor response to therapy. Key Points • Despite the cohort studies published in giant cell arteritis (GCA), there are no fully validated outcome measures for use in standard practice or clinical trials. • There is a gap in international standards for assessing GCA disease activity. • Identifying disease specific outcome measures is vital for monitoring response to therapy, treatment case series and therapeutic clinical trials in GCA. • This study was carried out aiming to classify the outcome measures for GCA with a discriminative ability to identify the disease activity status and response to therapy.

Adult and childhood vasculitis

Vasculitis refers to heterogeneous clinicopathologic disorders that share the histopathology of inflammation of blood vessels. Unrecognized and therefore untreated, vasculitis of the nervous system leads to pervasive injury and disability, making this a disorder of paramount importance to all clinicians. There has been remarkable progress in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of primary CNS and PNS vasculitides, predicated on achievement in primary systemic forms. Primary neurological vasculitides can be diagnosed with assurance after intensive evaluation that incudes tissue confirmation whenever possible. Clinicians must choose from among the available immune modulating, suppressive, and targeted immunotherapies to induce and maintain remission status and prevent relapse, unfortunately without the benefit of RCTs, and tempered by the recognition of anticipated medication side effects. It may be said that efforts to define a disease are attempts to understand the very concept of the disease. This has been especially evident in systemic and neurological disorders associated with vasculitis. For the past 100 years, since the first description of granulomatous angiitis of the brain, the CNS vasculitides have captured the attention of generations of clinical investigators around the globe to reach a better understanding of vasculitides involving the central and peripheral nervous system. Since that time it has become increasingly evident that this will necessitate an international collaborative effort.

Patient reported outcomes in systemic vasculitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review paper evaluates the use of patient reported outcome (PROs) in systemic vasculitis and the increasing incorporation of these measures in the evaluation of clinical outcomes and healthcare provision.

RECENT FINDINGS

Generic PROs such as the SF-12, SF-36, EQ-5D have been used to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) across the spectrum of vasculitis; including giant cell arteritis, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-related vasculitis and immunoglobulin A vasculitis (IgA) vasculitis. More recently disease-specific PROs have been developed including the associated vasculitis (AAV)-PRO and GCA-PRO, whilst further work is ongoing including a Steroid-PRO.

SUMMARY

Generic and disease-specific PROs are complimentary in nature, but the advent of disease-specific PROs allows evaluation of the impact of specific symptoms and intervention on patient HRQOL. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, the advent of increasing virtual work has brought the potential for electronic-PRO measures to the forefront and is a current area of interest.

18F-FDG PET/CT in Late Acquisition Identifies Sites of Active Disease in Treated Takayasu Arteritis

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have taken advantage of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography associated with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to personalize patient evaluation and identify sites of more active disease in Takayasu arteritis (TA)-treated patients. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in late acquisition in identifying sites of active disease in patients under full treatment for TA.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, patients under full treatment underwent whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. Sites of increased 18F-FDG uptake were classified by a score of 3 on the visual scale using the liver uptake as reference. A quantitative analysis was also performed by measuring the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) of the vascular wall of affected arteries. Disease activity using the National Institutes of Health criteria was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 20 patients, there were 18 female and 2 male patients, with a mean age of 43.6 (±11.58) years and a disease duration of 8.3 (±6.25) years. Thirteen participants (65%) were in inflammatory activity according to the criteria proposed by the National Institutes of Health. All patients received immunosuppressive agents, and one of them received immunobiological treatment. The highest SUV value was 6.2 in the aortic arch, and the lowest was 1.0 in the subclavian artery. The mean maximum SUV did not differ between clinically active and inactive patients. In the visual analysis, all participants had at least 1 vascular site with inflammatory activity, with an uptake ≥2 in relation to the liver. The aortic arch was the most frequently involved site.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that 18F-FDG PET/CT in late acquisition is an effective imaging method to assess TA activity even in fully treated patients.

Vascular Uptake on 18F-FDG PET/CT During the Clinically Inactive State of Takayasu Arteritis Is Associated with a Higher Risk of Relapse

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether vascular uptake on ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) during the clinically inactive state of Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is associated with disease relapse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with TAK who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT during the clinically inactive state of the disease between 2006 and 2019 were included. Clinically inactive disease was defined as a status not fulfilling the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria for active disease in TAK. Relapse was defined as recurrence of clinically active disease after a clinically inactive period, requiring change in the treatment regimen. Vascular uptake on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was assessed using target/background ratio (TBR), calculated as arterial maximum standardized uptake value (SUV)/mean SUV in venous blood pool. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with relapse.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients with clinically inactive TAK were included. During a median observation period of 4.5 (0.9-8.1) years, relapse occurred in 9 (27.3%) patients at median 1.3 (0.7-6.9) years. Notably, TBR [1.5 (1.3-1.8) vs. 1.3 (1.1-1.4), p=0.044] was significantly higher in patients who relapsed than in those who did not. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, the presence of NIH criterion 2 [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 7.044 (1.424-34.855), p=0.017] and TBR [adjusted HR: 11.533 (1.053-126.282), p=0.045] were significantly associated with an increased risk of relapse.

CONCLUSION

Vascular uptake on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and the presence of NIH criterion 2 are associated with future relapse in patients with clinically inactive TAK.

Resolution of vascular inflammation in patients with new-onset giant cell arteritis: data from the RIGA study

OBJECTIVES

Efficacy evaluation of GCA treatment is primarily based on non-specific symptoms and laboratory markers. We aimed to assess the change in vascular inflammation in patients with large vessel (LV)-GCA under different treatments using [18F]FDG PET/CT.

METHODS

Observational study on patients with new-onset, active LV-GCA starting treatment with either prednisolone monotherapy (PRED) or combination with MTX or tocilizumab (TOC). All patients underwent baseline and follow-up PET/CT. The aorta and its major branches were assessed using PET vascular activity score (PETVAS) by independent readers. Cumulative glucocorticoid doses and cessation of glucocorticoid treatment were documented in all patients.

RESULTS

We included 88 LV-GCA patients, 27 were treated with PRED, 42 with MTX and 19 with TOC. PETVAS decreased from 18.9-8.0 units at follow-up in the overall population (P <0.001). PETVAS changes were numerically higher in patients receiving MTX (-12.3 units) or TOC (-11.7 units) compared with PRED (-8.7). Mean cumulative prednisolone dosages were 5637, 4418 and 2984 mg in patients treated with PRED, MTX and TOC (P =0.002). Risk ratios for glucocorticoid discontinuation at the time of follow-up PET/CT were 6.77 (95% CI: 1.01, 45.29; P =0.049) and 16.25 (95% CI: 2.60, 101.73; P =0.003) for MTX and TOC users compared with PRED users.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of LV-GCA inhibits vascular inflammation in the aorta and its major branches. While similar control of vascular inflammation was achieved with PRED, MTX and TOC treatments, TOC showed a strong glucocorticoid sparing effect, supporting the concept of initial combination therapy.

Patient Reported Outcomes in Large Vessel Vasculitides

Purpose of Review

The goal of this paper is to review current and future uses of patient-reported outcomes in large vessel vasculitis. The large vessel vasculitides comprise Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu arteritis; both are types of systemic vasculitis which affect the larger blood vessels. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) capture the impact of these diseases on health-related quality of life.

Recent Findings

Generic PROs such as the SF-36 are currently used to compare HRQOL of people with GCA and TAK within clinical trials and observational studies and to make comparisons with the general population and HRQoL in other diseases. The development of a disease-specific PRO for GCA is currently underway. Beyond clinical trials, there is much interest in the use of PROs within routine clinical care, particularly E-PROs for remote use.

Summary

Further work will be needed to complete the development of disease-specific PROs for people with large vessel vasculitis and to establish feasibility, acceptability, and utility of E-PROs.

18F-FDG PET/CT plays a unique role in the management of Takayasu arteritis patients with atypical manifestations

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate the value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) aiding in diagnosing and evaluating disease activity in Takayasu arteritis (TA) patients with atypical clinical manifestations.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 22 TA patients was conducted. All the participants were classified into two groups. Group one including 12 patients, who did not fulfill American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, were diagnosed by modified Ishikawa criteria. Group two involving ten patients, who did not satisfy the modified Ishikawa criteria or ACR criteria, were clinically diagnosed as TA after panel discussion by a combination of clinical data, excluding other diagnoses. PET/CT results were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative metrics. Disease activity was evaluated using the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria.

RESULTS

In group one, nine patients in active stage and two patients in inactive stage had active FDG uptake. One patient in inactive stage had inactive PET/CT results. In group two, five patients in active stage had active FDG uptake and five patients in inactive stage had inactive FDG uptake with SUVmax values of several vascular lesions slightly lower than livermean in each person. The sensitivity of PET/CT scans for evaluating disease activity was 100.0%, specificity was 75.0%, positive predictive value was 87.5%, and negative predictive value was 100.0% compared to NIH criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT plays a unique role in diagnosing these TA with atypical manifestation and assisting in evaluating disease activity. Key Points • Diagnosis of these TA patients with atypical manifestations may be difficult. • PET/CT plays a unique role in diagnosing these TA patients and assisting in evaluating disease activity.

Childhood-onset Takayasu Arteritis

Childhood-onset Takayasu Arteritis (cTAK) is a rare, large-vessel type of vasculitis seen in children, mainly affecting the aorta and its major branches. Clinical manifestations are often severe and arise as a result of systemic and local inflammation, along with end-organ ischemia. Disease flares are common and the disease burden is high, with a significant rate of morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in understanding the underlying disease pathobiology resulted in the use of pathway-targeting agents, such as TNF- or IL-6 inhibitors with improved disease control. Nonetheless, the prognosis often remains guarded and the accrued damage is significant. This review aims at summarizing the recent evidence and observations regarding this condition, with a focus on pediatric publications.

Mechanism and biomarkers in aortitis--a review

Aortitis can be the manifestation of an underlying infectious or noninfectious disease process. An autoimmune cause is suggested in a large proportion of noninfectious causes. Similar to other autoimmune diseases, the pathophysiology of aortitis has been investigated in detail, but the etiology remains unknown. Most cases of aortitis often go undetected for a long time and are often identified at late stages of the disease. Recent advances in imaging techniques have significantly improved the diagnosis of aortitis. However, significant challenges associated with the imaging techniques limit their use. Several routine inflammation-based markers, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and inflammatory cytokines, are nonspecific and, therefore, have limited use in the diagnosis of aortitis. The search for more specific serum biomarkers, which can facilitate detection and progression is under progress. Several autoantibodies have been identified, but assigning their role in the pathogenesis as well as their specificity remains a challenge. The current review addresses some of these issues in detail. KEY MESSAGES: • Noninfectious aortitis is an autoimmune disease. • Several biomarkers, including cytokines and autoantibodies, are increased in aortitis. • Imaging techniques, commonly used to detect aortitis, are associated with the high cost and technical challenges. • There is a need to develop low-cost biomarker-based detection tools. • The knowledge of biomarkers in aortitis detection is discussed.

Treatment of Vasculitis of the Nervous System

The diagnosis of primary central and peripheral nerve vasculitides should be established with certainty if suspected before commencing potent immunosuppressive therapy. The aim of induction therapy is to rapidly control the underlying inflammatory response and stabilize the blood-brain and blood-nerve barriers, followed by maintenance immunosuppression tailored to the likeliest humoral and cell-mediated autoimmune inflammatory vasculitic processes.

Update on Outcome Measure Development in Large-vessel Vasculitis: Report from OMERACT 2018

OBJECTIVE

The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Vasculitis Working Group seeks to develop validated outcome measures for use in trials for large-vessel vasculitis (LVV).

METHODS

An international Delphi exercise conducted among investigators identified items considered important to measure active disease. In parallel, qualitative research with patients was conducted, including interviews and focus groups.

RESULTS

Next steps prioritized by the group for LVV include (1) defining disease states (remission, flare, and patient-acceptable symptom state) and (2) selection of patient-reported outcome tools.

CONCLUSION

The ultimate goal is to develop an OMERACT-endorsed core set of outcome measures for use in clinical trials of LVV.

Effect of Treatment on Imaging, Clinical, and Serologic Assessments of Disease Activity in Large-vessel Vasculitis

OBJECTIVE

Disease activity in large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) is traditionally assessed by clinical and serological variables rather than vascular imaging. This study determined the effect of treatment on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) vascular activity in relation to clinical- and serologic-based assessments.

METHODS

Patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) or Takayasu arteritis (TA) were prospectively evaluated at 6-month intervals in an observational cohort. Treatment changes were made at least 3 months before the followup visit and categorized as increased, decreased, or unchanged. Imaging (FDG-PET qualitative analysis), clinical, and serologic (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein) assessments were determined at each visit and compared over interval visits.

RESULTS

Serial assessments were performed in 52 patients with LVV (GCA = 31; TA = 21) over 156 visits. Increased, decreased, or unchanged therapy was recorded for 36-, 23-, and 32-visit intervals, respectively. When treatment was increased, there was significant reduction in disease activity by imaging, clinical, and inflammatory markers (p ≤ 0.01 for each). When treatment was unchanged, all 3 assessments of disease activity remained similarly unchanged over 6-month intervals. When treatment was reduced, PET activity significantly worsened (p = 0.02) but clinical and serologic activity did not significantly change. Treatment of GCA with tocilizumab and of TA with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors resulted in significant improvement in imaging and clinical assessments of disease activity, but only rarely did the assessments both become normal.

CONCLUSION

In addition to clinical and serologic assessments, vascular imaging has potential to monitor disease activity in LVV and should be tested as an outcome measure in randomized clinical trials.

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography for Monitoring Arterial Inflammation in Takayasu Arteritis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) compared with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in assessing vessel inflammation of Takayasu arteritis (TA).

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 71 patients with TA who had undergone carotid CEUS. Twenty-two of 71 patients underwent FDG-PET after CEUS. Clinical disease activity was assessed by Kerr criteria and the Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score 2010 (ITAS2010). We investigated the correlation between carotid vascularization on CEUS and clinical data. The consistency of carotid CEUS and PET data has been analyzed for TA disease activity.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant correlation between the results of CEUS and ITAS2010 (p = 0.004) or Kerr criteria (p < 0.001). According to ITAS2010, thirty-four of 71 patients with TA were clinically inactive. Assessment of 34 TA patients with clinically inactive disease yielded 11 CEUS scans that showed active lesions (visual grade ≥ 2) in the left or right carotid artery. In 22 cases that underwent CEUS and FDG-PET, 12 were active and 10 were inactive on the basis of ITAS2010. Moreover, bilateral carotid CEUS vascularization score positively correlated with vascular FDG uptake in these patients with TA (p = 0.004). When vascular inflammation was defined as FDG uptake with visual grade ≥ 2, carotid CEUS showed sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 80%.

CONCLUSION

For TA patients with clinically inactive disease, CEUS could help clinicians to identify active lesions in the carotid vascular region. Carotid CEUS may be a rapid and cost-effective imaging tool in the followup of patients with TA.

Feasibility and Construct Validation of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in Systemic Vasculitis

OBJECTIVE

The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a collection of item banks of self-reported health. This study assessed the feasibility and construct validity of using PROMIS instruments in vasculitis.

METHODS

Data from a multicenter longitudinal cohort of subjects with systemic vasculitis were used. Instruments from 10 PROMIS item banks were selected with direct involvement of patients. Subjects completed PROMIS instruments using computer adaptive testing (CAT). The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) was also administered. Cross-sectional construct validity was assessed by calculating correlations of PROMIS scores with SF-36 measures and physician and patient global scores for disease activity. Longitudinal construct validity was assessed by correlations of between-visit differences in PROMIS scores with differences in other measures.

RESULTS

During the study period, 973 subjects came for 2306 study visits and the PROMIS collection was completed at 2276 (99%) of visits. The median time needed to complete each PROMIS instrument ranged from 40 to 55 s. PROMIS instruments correlated cross-sectionally with individual scales of the SF-36, most strongly with subscales of the SF-36 addressing the same domain as the PROMIS instrument. For example, PROMIS fatigue correlated with both the physical component score (PCS; r = -0.65) and with the mental component score (MCS; r = -0.54). PROMIS physical function correlated strongly with PCS (r = 0.81) but weakly with MCS (r = 0.29). Weaker correlations were observed longitudinally between change in PROMIS scores with change in PCS and MCS.

CONCLUSION

Collection of data using CAT PROMIS instruments is feasible among patients with vasculitis and has some cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity.

Systemic vasculitis and patient-reported outcomes: how the assessment of patient preferences and perspectives could improve outcomes

The systemic vasculitides are a group of multisystem diseases, which can be life and organ threatening. High-dose immunosuppressants are required to control inflammation in vital organs, such as the kidneys, lungs, skin, joints, and eyes. Patients report a range of impacts on their health-related quality of life due to symptoms, irreversible damage, and the adverse effects of medications. The measurement of patient perspectives within clinical studies in vasculitis is essential to capture outcomes of greatest importance to patients. Validated generic, disease-specific and symptom-specific patient-reported outcomes available for use in patients with systemic vasculitis are reviewed here.

Pathophysiology of large vessel vasculitis and utility of interleukin-6 inhibition therapy

Takayasu arteritis (TAK) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) affect mainly large- and medium-sized arteries. In refractory cases, vascular remodeling progresses and leads to serious outcomes. Studies have demonstrated that cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6 play crucial roles in the pathophysiology of TAK and GCA. Recently, randomized controlled trials on IL-6 inhibition therapy using tocilizumab (TCZ) were performed, and significant effects were exhibited. The purposes of conventional treatments have been to improve symptoms and decrease the levels of inflammatory markers. Arterial changes have been considered as damages. However, after TCZ came into practical use, establishment of treat to target is desired to prevent vascular remodeling. In contrast, a combination therapy of glucocorticoids (GCs) and TCZ notably increases the risk of infections. When TCZ is used, careful attention must be paid to possible infections, and dose of GC should be tapered as much as possible. Future tasks are to establish indication and dosage of TCZ, indication for discontinuation of TCZ due to remission, efficacy of TCZ monotherapy, and protocols of TCZ for pediatric cases.

Current and emerging therapies in large-vessel vasculitis

GCA shares many clinical features with PMR and Takayasu arteritis. The current mainstay of therapy for all three conditions is glucocorticoid therapy. Given the chronic, relapsing nature of these conditions and the morbidity associated with glucocorticoid therapy, there is a need for better treatment options to induce and sustain remission with fewer adverse effects. Conventional immunosuppressive treatments have been studied and have a modest effect. There is a keen interest in biologic therapies with studies showing the efficacy of IL-6 antagonists in PMR and GCA. Recently the first two randomized clinical trials in Takayasu arteritis have been completed. A major challenge for all of these conditions is the lack of standardized measures to assess disease activity. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the impact of biologic therapies showing potential on important clinical outcomes such as vascular damage, cost-effectiveness and quality of life. The optimal duration of treatment also needs to be assessed.

Unmet Needs in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Vasculitides

Despite the progress in the last years on the field of vasculitides, there are several unmet needs regarding classification, disease activity assessment, predictors of flares and complications, and type of treatment for the different forms. The 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria currently used to define giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis were designed to discriminate between different types of vasculitides but not to differentiate vasculitis from other disorders. Recently, efforts have been made to overcome the shortcomings of the ACR criteria. The lack of an accepted definition of disease activity in large-vessel vasculitides presents a major challenge in creating useful and valid outcome tools for the assessment of disease course. Identification of predictors of flares can aid in optimizing therapeutic strategies, minimizing disease flares, and reducing treatment-related side effects. It is furthermore important to recognize and characterize the risk factor that might predict the manifestations associated with poor outcome and prognosis. Two RCTs have evidenced the efficacy of tocilizumab in addition to glucocorticoids (GCs) in the treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA). However, the role of tocilizumab or other biological agents without GCs needs to be investigated. Recent observational studies have suggested that rituximab is also effective in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-negative patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. Rituximab or anti-TNF alfa may represent a possible alternative therapy in case of refractory or difficult to treat polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) patients. The new International Criteria for Behçet's Disease have shown a better sensitivity and a better accuracy compared to the older International Study Group on Behçet's Disease criteria. The EULAR recommendations for the management of Behçet's disease (BD) have been recently updated. However, the treatment of refractory disease is still a real challenge.

Arterial lesions in giant cell arteritis: A longitudinal study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate large-vessel (LV) abnormalities on serial imaging in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) and discern predictors of new lesions.

METHODS

Clinical and imaging data from patients with GCA (including subjects diagnosed by LV imaging) enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal study and/or a randomized clinical trial were included. New arterial lesions were defined as a lesion in a previously unaffected artery.

RESULTS

The study included 187 patients with GCA, 146 (78%) female, mean (±SD) age at diagnosis 68.5 ± 8.5 years; 39% diagnosed by LV imaging. At least one arterial lesion was present in 123 (66%) on the first study. The most frequently affected arteries were subclavian (42%), axillary (32%), and thoracic aorta (20%). In 106 patients (57%) with serial imaging, new arterial lesions were noted in 41 patients (39%), all of whom had a baseline abnormality, over a mean (±SD) follow-up of 4.39 (2.22) years. New abnormalities were observed in 33% patients by year 2; clinical features of active disease were present at only 50% of these cases. There were no differences in age, sex, temporal artery biopsy positivity, or disease activity in patients with or without new lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients with GCA, LV abnormalities on first imaging were common. Development of new arterial lesions occurred in patients with arterial abnormalities at first imaging, often in the absence of symptoms of active disease. Arterial imaging should be considered in all patients with GCA at diagnosis and serial imaging at least in patients with baseline abnormalities.

Takayasu arteritis and giant cell arteritis: are they a spectrum of the same disease?

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK) are forms of large-vessel vasculitides that affect the aorta and its branches. There is ongoing debate about whether they are within a spectrum of the same disease or different diseases. Shared commonalities include clinical features, evidence of systemic inflammation, granulomatous inflammation on biopsy, role of T-helper (Th)-1 and Th17 in the pathogenesis, and, abnormalities of the aorta and its branches on imaging. However, there are also several differences in the geographic distribution, genetics, inflammatory cells and responses to treatment. This review highlights the similarities and differences in the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, imaging findings and treatment responses in these conditions. Current data supports that they are two distinct conditions despite the numerous similarities.

18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography As an Imaging Biomarker in a Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort of Patients With Large Vessel Vasculitis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical value of ¹⁸ F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in a prospective cohort of patients with large vessel vasculitis (LVV) and comparator subjects.

METHODS

Patients with Takayasu arteritis and giant cell arteritis were studied, along with a comparator group consisting of patients with hyperlipidemia, patients with diseases that mimic LVV, and healthy controls. Participants underwent clinical evaluation and FDG-PET imaging, and patients with LVV underwent serial imaging at 6-month intervals. We calculated sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET interpretation for distinguishing patients with clinically active LVV from comparator subjects and from patients with disease in clinical remission. A qualitative summary score based on global arterial FDG uptake, the PET Vascular Activity Score (PETVAS), was used to study associations between activity on PET scan and clinical characteristics and to predict relapse.

RESULTS

A total of 170 FDG-PET scans were performed in 115 participants (56 patients with LVV and 59 comparator subjects). FDG-PET distinguished patients with clinically active LVV from comparator subjects with a sensitivity of 85% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 69, 94) and a specificity of 83% (95% CI 71, 91). FDG-PET scans were interpreted as active vasculitis in most patients with LVV in clinical remission (41 of 71 [58%]). Clinical disease activity status, disease duration, body mass index, and glucocorticoid use were independently associated with activity on PET scan. Among patients who underwent PET during clinical remission, future clinical relapse was more common in patients with a high PETVAS than in those with a low PETVAS (55% versus 11%; P = 0.03) over a median follow-up period of 15 months.

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET provides information about vascular inflammation that is complementary to, and distinct from, clinical assessment in LVV. FDG-PET scan activity during clinical remission was associated with future clinical relapse.

Takayasu arteritis: challenges in diagnosis and management

Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a rare disease affecting chiefly young women, although it can affect both men and women and persons of many different ethnicities. TA carries a high morbidity rate, but importantly, overall mortality has declined over time such that the 15-year survival rate has increased from 82.9% for patients diagnosed between 1957 and 1975 to 96.5% for those diagnosed from 1976 to 1990. Severity of presenting arterial complications and delay to diagnosis have also decreased over the past decade owing to advances in non-invasive diagnostic imaging and the development of medical therapies. Despite these advances, there still remain significant gaps in the diagnosis and management of these complex patients. These gaps encompass the basic, yet extremely complex, tasks of defining a universally accepted diagnostic criterion, accurate assessment of disease activity and development of clinically meaningful and accurate outcome measures to guide necessary clinical trials for the management of these complex patients.

Development of a Core Set of Outcome Measures for Large-vessel Vasculitis: Report from OMERACT 2016

OBJECTIVE

Among the challenges in conducting clinical trials in large-vessel vasculitis (LVV), including both giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TA), is the lack of standardized and meaningful outcome measures. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Vasculitis Working Group initiated an international effort to develop and validate data-driven outcome tools for clinical investigation in LVV.

METHODS

An international Delphi exercise was completed to gather opinions from clinical experts on LVV-related domains considered important to measure in trials. Patient interviews and focus groups were completed to identify outcomes of importance to patients. The results of these activities were presented and discussed in a "Virtual Special Interest Group" using telephone- and Internet-based conferences, discussions through electronic mail, and an in-person session at the 2016 OMERACT meeting. A preliminary core set of domains common for all forms of LVV with disease-specific elements was proposed.

RESULTS

The majority of experts agree with using common outcome measures for GCA and TA, with the option of supplementation with disease-specific items. Following interviews and focus groups, pain, fatigue, and emotional effect emerged as health-related quality of life domains important to patients. Current disease assessment tools, including the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score, were found to be inadequate to assess disease activity in GCA and standardized assessment of imaging tests were felt crucial to study LVV, especially TA.

CONCLUSION

Initial data from a clinician Delphi exercise and structured patient interviews have provided themes toward an OMERACT-endorsed core set of domains and outcome measures.

Assessment of Disease Activity in Large-vessel Vasculitis: Results of an International Delphi Exercise

OBJECTIVE

To arrive at consensus for candidate outcomes for disease activity assessment in large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) in clinical trials.

METHODS

A Delphi survey including 99 items was circulated among international experts for 3 rounds.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven items were accepted for both giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis. Sixty-seven percent of experts voted to have a common approach for both diseases with additional disease-specific items such as weight loss, scalp tenderness/necrosis, morning stiffness, dizziness, visual symptoms, and imaging.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights similarities and differences in experts' perspectives for assessing clinical activity in LVV and may guide a consensus-driven core set of validated outcomes.

A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Abatacept (CTLA-4Ig) for the Treatment of Takayasu Arteritis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of abatacept to that of placebo for the treatment of Takayasu arteritis (TAK).

METHODS

In this multicenter trial, patients with newly diagnosed or relapsing TAK were treated with abatacept 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1, 15, and 29 and week 8, together with prednisone administered daily. At week 12, patients in remission underwent a double-blinded randomization to continue to receive abatacept monthly or switch to placebo. Patients in both study arms received a standardized prednisone taper, reaching a dosage of 20 mg daily at week 12, with discontinuation of prednisone at week 28. All patients remained on their randomized assignment until meeting criteria for early termination or until 12 months after enrollment of the last patient. The primary end point was duration of remission (relapse-free survival).

RESULTS

Thirty-four eligible patients with TAK were enrolled and treated with prednisone and abatacept; of these, 26 reached the week 12 randomization and underwent a blinded randomization to receive either abatacept or placebo. The relapse-free survival rate at 12 months was 22% for those receiving abatacept and 40% for those receiving placebo (P = 0.853). Treatment with abatacept in patients with TAK enrolled in this study was not associated with a longer median duration of remission (median duration 5.5 months for abatacept versus 5.7 months for placebo). There was no difference in the frequency or severity of adverse events, including infection, between the treatment arms.

CONCLUSION

In patients with TAK, the addition of abatacept to a treatment regimen with prednisone did not reduce the risk of relapse.

A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Abatacept (CTLA-4Ig) for the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of abatacept to that of placebo for the treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS

In this multicenter trial, patients with newly diagnosed or relapsing GCA were treated with abatacept 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1, 15, and 29 and week 8, together with prednisone administered daily. At week 12, patients in remission underwent a double-blinded randomization to continue to receive abatacept monthly or switch to placebo. Patients in both study arms received a standardized prednisone taper, with discontinuation of prednisone at week 28. All patients remained on their randomized assignment until meeting criteria for early termination or until 12 months after enrollment of the last patient. The primary end point was duration of remission (relapse-free survival rate).

RESULTS

Forty-nine eligible patients with GCA were enrolled and treated with prednisone and abatacept; of these, 41 reached the week 12 randomization and underwent a blinded randomization to receive abatacept or placebo. Prednisone was tapered using a standardized schedule, reaching a daily dosage of 20 mg at week 12 with discontinuation in all patients at week 28. The relapse-free survival rate at 12 months was 48% for those receiving abatacept and 31% for those receiving placebo (P = 0.049). A longer median duration of remission was seen in those receiving abatacept compared to those receiving placebo (median duration 9.9 months versus 3.9 months; P = 0.023). There was no difference in the frequency or severity of adverse events, including infection, between the treatment arms.

CONCLUSION

In patients with GCA, the addition of abatacept to a treatment regimen with prednisone reduced the risk of relapse and was not associated with a higher rate of toxicity compared to prednisone alone.

A scoping review of the use of non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in the management of large vessel vasculitis

Takayasu's arteritis (TA) and Giant cell arteritis (GCA) comprise the large vessel vasculitides (LVV). Patients with LVV are treated with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), both conventional (cDMARDs) and biologic (bDMARDs). We undertook a scoping review to assess the effectiveness of cDMARDs in TA and GCA. We could identify 11 studies in TA and 18 studies in GCA. There were only 3 randomized controlled trials on methotrexate, one on hydroxychloroquine and two on cyclosporine in GCA, the others being case series (including all studies on TA). Most of these studies had small patient numbers (median 15 in TA and 27 in GCA). Outcome measures reported in different studies were heterogenous. Overall, methotrexate, leflunomide, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide were effective in TA (low quality of evidence). Methotrexate (high quality of evidence), hydroxychloroquine and cyclosporine (moderate quality of evidence) appeared to be ineffective in GCA. Azathioprine (moderate quality of evidence), leflunomide, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide and dapsone (low quality of evidence) were effective in GCA. There exists a paucity of high quality evidence to guide use of cDMARDs in TA and GCA. There is an unmet need to conduct large multi-centric randomized placebo-controlled trials to accurately assess the utility on cDMARDs in LVV.

Leflunomide in Takayasu arteritis - A long term observational study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the extended follow-up data on efficacy and toxicity of leflunomide therapy in Takayasu arteritis (TA) patients previously enrolled in the original open-label study of short-term effects of leflunomide in TA.

METHODS

An open-label long-term longitudinal study was performed in TA patients who fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria for TA and had participated in a previous study that evaluated short-term efficacy of leflunomide in TA. Complete follow-up information could be retrieved from 12 out of 15 patients enrolled in the original study. Disease activity was evaluated by Kerr's criteria and by the Indian Takayasu Activity Score 2010 (ITAS2010).

RESULTS

The mean follow up time was 43.0±7.6 months and 5 (41.6%) TA patients remained on leflunomide therapy while 7 (58.3%) TA patients had to change to another therapy due to failure to prevent relapses in 6 patients and toxicity in one patient. No significant differences were found between patients who remained on leflunomide therapy and those who changed to another agent regarding age at study entry, time since diagnosis, prednisone daily dose at study entry, baseline ITAS2010, mean or maximum ESR and CRP, and cumulative prednisone dose at study end. Among TA patients who had changed leflunomide to another agent, two had an additional clinical relapse and needed to change therapy.

CONCLUSION

Leflunomide led to sustained remission in approximately half of patients at a mean time of 12 months and was well tolerated by TA patients.

The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score as a Measure of Disease Activity in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) in the assessment of disease activity in giant cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS

Patients with GCA enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal study with symptoms of active vasculitis during any visit were included. Spearman's rank correlation was used to explore the association of the BVAS with other measures of disease activity.

RESULTS

During a mean (SD) followup of 2.3 (1.6) years, symptoms of active GCA were present in 236 visits in 136 subjects (100 female, 74%). Median (range) BVAS1 (new/worse symptoms) was 1 (0-10) and median (range) BVAS2 (persistent symptoms) was 0 (0-5). Median (range) physician's global assessment (PGA) was 4 (0-9) for disease activity in the past 28 days and 2 (0-9) for activity on the day of the visit. Important ischemic manifestations of active vasculitis not recorded by the BVAS included tongue/jaw claudication (27%), upper extremity claudication (15%), lower extremity claudication (5%), carotidynia (7%), and ischemic retinopathy (5%). During 25 visits (11%) with active disease, all symptoms of active vasculitis were placed in the "Other" category yet still resulted in a BVAS1 and BVAS2 of 0. BVAS1 moderately correlated with PGA for the past 28 days (Spearman's correlation 0.50) and physician-rated disease activity for the past 28 days (Spearman's correlation 0.46).

CONCLUSION

The BVAS has limited utility in GCA. Patients with active GCA can have a BVAS of 0. Many important ischemic symptoms attributable to active vasculitis are not included in the composite score.

Leflunomide in Takayasu arteritis - A long term observational study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the extended follow-up data on efficacy and toxicity of leflunomide therapy in Takayasu arteritis (TA) patients previously enrolled in the original open-label study of short-term effects of leflunomide in TA.

METHODS

An open-label long-term longitudinal study was performed in TA patients who fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria for TA and had participated in a previous study that evaluated short-term efficacy of leflunomide in TA. Complete follow-up information could be retrieved from 12 out of 15 patients enrolled in the original study. Disease activity was evaluated by Kerr's criteria and by the Indian Takayasu Activity Score 2010 (ITAS2010).

RESULTS

The mean follow up time was 43.0±7.6 months and 5 (41.6%) TA patients remained on leflunomide therapy while 7 (58.3%) TA patients had to change to another therapy due to failure to prevent relapses in 6 patients and toxicity in one patient. No significant differences were found between patients who remained on leflunomide therapy and those who changed to another agent regarding age at study entry, time since diagnosis, prednisone daily dose at study entry, baseline ITAS2010, mean or maximum ESR and CRP, and cumulative prednisone dose at study end. Among two TA patients who had changed laflunomide to another agent, two had a clinical relapse and needed to change therapy.

CONCLUSION

Leflunomide led to sustained remission in approximately half of patients at a mean time of 12 months and was well tolerated by TA patients.

Update on Outcome Measure Development for Large Vessel Vasculitis: Report from OMERACT 12

OBJECTIVE

The rarity of large vessel vasculitis (LVV) is a major factor limiting randomized controlled trials in LVV, resulting in treatment choices in these diseases that are guided mainly by observational studies and expert opinion. Further complicating trials in LVV is the absence of validated and meaningful outcome measures. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) vasculitis working group initiated the Large Vessel Vasculitis task force in 2009 to develop data-driven, validated outcome tools for clinical investigation in LVV. This report summarizes the progress that has been made on a disease activity assessment tool and patient-reported outcomes in LVV as well as the group's research agenda.

METHODS

The OMERACT LVV task force brought an international group of investigators and patient research partners together to work collaboratively on developing outcome tools. The group initially focused on disease activity assessment tools in LVV. Following a systematic literature review, an international Delphi exercise was conducted to obtain expert opinion on principles and domains for disease assessment. The OMERACT vasculitis working group's LVV task force is also conducting qualitative research with patients, including interviews, focus groups, and engaging patients as research partners, all to ensure that the approach to disease assessment includes measures of patients' perspectives and that patients have input into the research agenda and process.

RESULTS

The preliminary results of both the Delphi exercise and the qualitative interviews were discussed at the OMERACT 12 (2014) meeting and the completion of the analyses will produce an initial set of domains and instruments to form the basis of next steps in the research agenda.

CONCLUSION

The research agenda continues to evolve, with the ultimate goal of developing an OMERACT-endorsed core set of outcome measures for use in clinical trials of LVV.

Outcome measures for Takayasu's arteritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) is a large-vessel vasculitis with a chronic, indolent course affecting the aorta and its main branches. This review will describe the recent studies to develop validated outcome measures to assess TAK.

RECENT FINDINGS

TAK is traditionally assessed with a physician's global assessment including symptoms and signs of inflammation and vascular insufficiency, acute-phase reactants (APRs), and imaging including conventional digital subtraction angiography, computerized tomographic, and magnetic resonance angiography, and recently 18-FDG-PET. Recent attempts to develop a validated tool for disease assessment include the Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score (ITAS2010), which incorporates clinical signs and symptoms with APRs in a simplified and weighted adoption of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score. Among biomarkers to assess clinical activity, pentraxin-3 is perhaps the most promising, but its validity and superiority against APRs in clinical practice need to be demonstrated. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly recognized as of substantial importance to measure in clinical trials; in addition to so-called 'generic' tools such as the SF-36 or measures of fatigue, disease-specific instruments would likely help capture aspects of TAK not measured by generic quality-of-life assessments or physician-based tools.

SUMMARY

Although outcome measures for TAK are not sufficiently validated, progress in the assessment of TAK is reflected in recent studies with new tools such as ITAS2010, new biomarkers, and a variety of PROs.

What matters for patients with vasculitis?

Advances in clinical care for patients with vasculitis have improved survival rates and created new challenges related to the ongoing management of chronic disease. Lack of curative therapies, burden of disease, treatment-related side effects, and fear of relapse contribute to patient-perceived reduction in quality of life. Patient-held beliefs about disease and priorities may differ substantially from the beliefs of their health care providers, and research paradigms are shifting to reflect more emphasis on understanding vasculitis from the patient's perspective. Efforts are ongoing to develop disease outcome measures in vasculitis that better represent the patient experience. Health care providers who care for patients with vasculitis should be sensitive to the substantial burdens of disease commonly experienced by patients living with the disease and should strive to provide comprehensive care directed towards the medical and biopsychological needs of these patients.

State of the art in the treatment of systemic vasculitides

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies (ANCA) are associated with small vessel vasculitides (AASV) affecting the lungs and kidneys. Structured clinical assessment using the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score and Vasculitis Damage Index should form the basis of a treatment plan and be used to document progress, including relapse. Severe disease with organ or life threatening manifestations needs cyclophosphamide or rituximab, plus high dose glucocorticoids, followed by lower dose steroid plus azathioprine, or methotrexate. Additional plasmapheresis is effective for very severe disease, reducing dialysis dependence from 60 to 40% in the first year, but with no effect on mortality or long-term renal function, probably due to established renal damage. In milder forms of ANCA-associated vasculitis, methotrexate, leflunomide, or mycophenolate mofetil are effective. Mortality depends on initial severity: 25% in patients with renal failure or severe lung hemorrhage; 6% for generalized non-life threatening AASV but rising to 30–40% at 5 years. Mortality from GPA is four times higher than the background population. Early deaths are due to active vasculitis and infection. Subsequent deaths are more often due to cardiovascular events, infection, and cancer. We need to improve the long-term outcome, by controlling disease activity but also preventing damage and drug toxicity. By contrast, in large vessel vasculitis where mortality is much less but morbidity potentially greater, such as giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis, therapeutic options are limited. High dose glucocorticoid results in significant toxicity in over 80%. Advances in understanding the biology of the vasculitides are improving therapies. Novel, mechanism based therapies such as rituximab in AASV, mepolizumab in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and tocilizumab in GCA, but the lack of reliable biomarkers remains a challenge to progress in these chronic relapsing diseases.

Prospective long term follow-up of a cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis screened for aortic structural damage (aneurysm or dilatation)

BACKGROUND

Aortic structural damage (ASD) may complicate the course of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). However the frequency and outcome of ASD has not been assessed in long term prospective studies.

METHODS

In a previous screening of 54 biopsy proven GCA patients, significant ASD was detected in 12 (22.2%) after a median follow-up of 5.4 years. These patients were periodically evaluated (every 4 years) over a median of 10.3 years (range 4-16.6 years) in order to investigate the development of new ASD and the outcome of previously detected abnormalities.

RESULTS

18 of the 54 patients abandoned the study due to death or other reasons. The remaining 36 patients were subjected to a second screening and 14 to a third screening. 12 (33.3%) of the 36 patients re-screened and 16 (29.6%) of the initial cohort developed ASD, all but one in the thoracic aorta. Aortic diameters at the ascending and descending aorta significantly increased over time. One patient (1.9% of the initial cohort) died from aortic dissection. Surgery was advised in eight (50%) patients with ASD but could only be performed in three patients (37.7%). The development of ASD was not associated with persistence of detectable disease activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ASD is maximal within the first 5 years after diagnosis but continues developing over time, affecting up to 33.3% of individuals after long term follow-up. Once ASD occurs, dilatation increases over time, underlining the need for periodic evaluation. Surgical repair is feasible in about one-third of candidates.

Outcome measures used in clinical trials for Behçet syndrome: a systematic review

Behçet syndrome (BS) is a multisystem vasculitis that is most active during young adulthood, causing serious disability and significant impairment in quality of life. Differences in the disease course, severity, and organ involvement between patients, depending on the age at presentation and sex, makes it impossible to determine a single management strategy. The diversity and variability in the outcome measures used in clinical trials in BS makes it difficult to compare the results or inform physicians about the best management strategy for individual patients. There is a large unmet need to determine or develop validated outcome measures for use in clinical trials in BS that are acceptable to researchers and regulatory agencies. We conducted a systematic review to describe the outcomes and outcome measures that have been used in clinical trials in BS. This review revealed the diversity and variability in the outcomes and outcome measures and the lack of standard definitions for most outcomes and rarity of validated outcome tools for disease assessment in BS. This systematic literature review will identify domains and candidate instruments for use in a Delphi exercise, the next step in the development of a core set of outcome measures that are properly validated and widely accepted by the collaboration of researchers from many different regions of the world and from different specialties, including rheumatology, ophthalmology, dermatology, gastroenterology, and neurology.

Current status of outcome measure development in vasculitis

The conduct of randomized controlled trials for vasculitis, especially for the antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitides [AAV, granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's) and microscopic polyangiitis], has been greatly advanced by the development, use, and acceptance of validated outcome measures. Trials have subsequently provided the opportunity to validate and refine reliable, valid outcome measures for these multisystemic and relapsing rare diseases. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Vasculitis Working Group was formed in 2004 to foster development of validated and widely accepted outcomes in vasculitis using data-driven analyses, a dedication to building consensus, and adherence to, and guidance by, the principles of the OMERACT approach. This work led to the endorsement by OMERACT of the core set of domains and associated outcome measures for AAV. Next steps for the study of existing outcome tools in AAV include better definition of response criteria through development of more data-driven weighting of the elements of activity and damage assessment. The Working Group is now also embarking on a series of linked projects to develop validated patient-reported outcomes for use in clinical research in vasculitis. Additionally, the Working Group is studying how current methods of disease assessment and plans for new outcomes can be informed by the conceptual framework of the International Classification of Function of the World Health Organization. The success of the Group's work in AAV has also led to a formal process for developing outcomes for the large vessel vasculitides (Takayasu arteritis and giant cell arteritis) and Behçet disease.

Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the assessment of the carotid artery wall in patients with Takayasu or giant cell arteritis

AIMS

Carotid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) was recently proposed for the evaluation of large-vessel vasculitides (LVV), particularly to assess vascularization within the vessel wall. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the potential of carotid colour Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) and CEUS in patients with LVV.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective study included seven patients (mean age 48 ± 14 years, all females) with established LVV (Takayasu arteritis or giant cell arteritis). All patients underwent CDUS and CEUS (14 carotid arteries). Intima-media thickness, lumen diameter, Doppler velocities, vessel wall thickening, and lesion thickness were assessed. CEUS was used to improve visualization of the lumen-to-vessel wall border, and to visualize carotid wall vascularization. Four (57%) patients [7 (50%) carotid arteries] exhibited lesions, and the average lesion thickness was 2.0 ± 0.5 mm. According to the Doppler peak systolic velocity, 5 (35%) carotid arteries had a <50% stenosis, 1 (7%) had a 50-70% stenosis, and 1 (7%) had a ≥70% stenosis. The contrast agent improved the image quality and the definition of the lumen-to-vascular wall border. Carotid wall vascularization was observed in 5 (71%) patients [9 (64%) carotid arteries]. Five (36%) carotid arteries had mild-to-moderate vascularization, and 4 (29%) had severe wall vascularization.

CONCLUSION

Carotid CDUS allows the assessment of anatomical features of LVV, including vessel wall thickening and degree of stenosis. Carotid CEUS improves the visualization of the lumen border, and allows dynamic assessment of carotid wall vascularization, which is a potential marker of disease activity in patients with LVV.

Disease activity assessment in childhood vasculitis: development and preliminary validation of the Paediatric Vasculitis Activity Score (PVAS)

BACKGROUND

Rare chronic childhood vasculitides lack a reliable disease activity assessment tool. With emerging new treatment modalities such a tool has become increasingly essential for both clinical practice and therapeutic trials to reproducibly quantify change in disease state.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a paediatric vasculitis activity assessment tool based on modification of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVASv.3).

METHODS

A paediatric vasculitis registry was reviewed to identify clinical features missing in the BVASv.3. A modified nominal group technique was used to develop a working version of the Paediatric Vasculitis Activity Score (PVAS). Prospective validation provided tool reliability, reproducibility and responsiveness to change. Training of assessors was done according to the BVAS principles.

RESULTS

BVAS items were redefined (n=22) and eight paediatric items added in Cutaneous (n=4), Cardiovascular (n=3) and Abdominal (n=1) sections. The final PVAS has 64 active items in nine categories. The principles of new/worse and persistently active disease were retained as were the overall score and weighting of categories. The median PVAS in 63 children with systemic vasculitis was 4/63 (0-38/63). There was a high interobserver agreement for the overall as well as for subsystem scores (linear-weighted-κ ≥0.87). PVAS correlated with physician's global assessment (p<0.01); treatment decision (p=<0.01) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (p=0.01). In response to treatment, 15/19 patients assessed demonstrated a significant fall in PVAS (p=0.002), with good agreement among assessors for this change.

CONCLUSIONS

The PVAS validity in children with systemic vasculitis was demonstrated. Like the BVAS, we anticipate that the PVAS will provide a robust tool to objectively define disease activity for clinical trials and future research.