Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Golimumab in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis despite Methotrexate Therapy: Final 5-year Results of the GO-FORWARD Trial

Early identification of golimumab-treated patients with higher likelihood of long-term retention

Background

The early identification of patients' profiles most likely to respond to and maintain long-term therapy with a biological drug can have clinical and cost-effectiveness implications.

Objectives

To evaluate the utility of an innovative approach for early identification of patient profiles associated with long-term persistence of golimumab, a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) under real-world conditions.

Design

Retrospective non-interventional database analysis.

Methods

Kaplan-Meier curves of golimumab retention over 8 years from the BIOBADASER registry, overall and by indication, were analysed using a novel approach (a two-phase decay model) to identify the point at which the golimumab retention curve shifted from rapid (indicating high golimumab discontinuation rate) to slow decay (low discontinuation rate). Factors associated with golimumab retention at these time points were identified using Cox regression, and retention rates for different patient profiles were calculated.

Results

885 patients were included. The golimumab retention curve shifted from rapid to slow decay at month 10 for the overall population (retention rate: 73.4%), at month 24 for RA patients (retention: 45.0%), and at month 8 for SpA, including axial SpA and PsA (81.6%). Factors associated with golimumab discontinuation at these early points were, overall, similar to those previously identified at year 8 (RA diagnosis, golimumab as second- or third-line of biological therapy, disease activity over the median and treatment with corticosteroids at golimumab initiation, advanced age [in RA], and female gender [in SpA]).

Conclusion

With this novel approach, the factors associated with long-term retention were identified in the initial period of rapid discontinuation of golimumab.

Long-term golimumab persistence: Five-year treatment retention data pooled from pivotal Phase III clinical trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis

INTRODUCTION

Golimumab, a monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), is used widely for treatment of rheumatic diseases. Long-term persistence is an important factor influencing therapeutic benefit and is a surrogate measure of efficacy. We compared five-year golimumab treatment persistence across studies, indications, and lines of therapy using pooled data from pivotal golimumab Phase III clinical trials.

METHODS

This post-hoc analysis evaluated use of golimumab administered subcutaneously (50 or 100 mg every four weeks) for up to five years in 2228 adult participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA; GO-BEFORE, GO-AFTER, and GO-FORWARD studies), psoriatic arthritis (PsA; GO-REVEAL study), or ankylosing spondylitis (AS; GO-RAISE study). Retention rate differences were evaluated by study, indication, and line of therapy using log-rank tests, and probability of treatment persistence was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Golimumab retention rates at Year 5 were consistently high when used as 1st-line therapy (69.8%) and did not differ significantly across the three indications tested (p = 0.5106) or across 1st-line studies (p = 0.2327). Retention at Year 5 was better in participants using golimumab as 1st-line than in those using it as 2nd-line (41.6%) therapy. Participants on 2nd-line golimumab therapy had a longer disease duration (median 9.2 years versus 3.7 years) than those on 1st-line golimumab therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the value of long-term golimumab therapy in patients with chronic, immune-mediated rheumatic diseases when used as 1st-line (RA, PsA, AS) or 2nd-line (RA) therapy. Key Points • Golimumab is a human monoclonal antibody directed against tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and is approved widely for the treatment of rheumatic autoimmune diseases. • We compared the probability of treatment persistence, or the time of continuous drug use, for golimumab across five Phase III studies spanning multiple rheumatic indications over five years. • Treatment persistence was favorable and did not differ significantly for participants with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis, but persistence was greater when golimumab was used as 1st-line than as 2nd-line biologic therapy.

Risk factors associated with relapse after methotrexate dose reduction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving golimumab and methotrexate combination therapy

AIM

To identify risk factors for relapse after methotrexate (MTX) dose reduction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving golimumab (GLM)/MTX combination therapy.

METHOD

Data on RA patients ≥20 years old receiving GLM (50 mg) + MTX for ≥6 months were retrospectively collected. MTX dose reduction was defined as a reduction of ≥12 mg from the total dose within 12 weeks of the maximum dose (≥1 mg/wk average). Relapse was defined as Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP) score ≥3.2 or sustained (≥ twice) increase of ≥0.6 from baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 304 eligible patients were included. Among the MTX-reduction group (n = 125), 16.8% of patients relapsed. Age, duration from diagnosis to the initiation of GLM, baseline MTX dose, and DAS28-CRP were comparable between relapse and no-relapse groups. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of relapse after MTX reduction was 4.37 (95% CI 1.16-16.38, P = 0.03) for prior use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and the aORs for cardiovascular disease (CVD), gastrointestinal disease and liver disease were 2.36, 2.28, and 3.03, respectively. Compared to the non-reduction group, the MTX-reduction group had a higher proportion of patients with CVD (17.6% vs 7.3%, P = 0.02) and a lower proportion of prior use of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (11.2% vs. 24.0%, P = 0.0076).

CONCLUSION

Attention should be given to RA patients with history of CVD, gastrointestinal disease, liver disease, or prior NSAIDs-use when considering MTX dose reduction to ensure benefits outweigh the risks of relapse.

Long-term retention of golimumab treatment in clinical practice in a large cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis

AIM

To assess the golimumab retention rate during up to 8 years of follow up, and any associated factors.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the BIOBADASER (Spanish registry of biological drugs) database, assessing all adults who had ever started golimumab >6 months before the analysis for an approved indication (rheumatoid arthritis [RA], axial spondyloarthritis [SpA] or psoriatic arthritis [PsA]).

RESULTS

Among 885 patients (RA 267, axial SpA 370, PsA 248) receiving 944 cycles of golimumab, the retention rate of golimumab was 71.1% (95% confidence interval: 68.0-73.9) at year 1% and 37.7% (95% CI: 33.3-42.1) at year 7 and at year 8. Retention was higher when golimumab was used as the first biological drug (81.7% at year 1, 49.9% at year 7, p < 0.001). In Cox regression analysis, factors associated with golimumab retention included use as first-line therapy (hazard ratio [HR] for discontinuation 1.52 for second- and 1.79 for third/later-line vs. first-line), use in axial SpA or PsA rather than RA (HR for axial SpA vs. RA 0.59, for PsA vs. Rheumatoid arthritis 0.67), and treatment with concomitant methotrexate (HR 0.67). Factors associated with golimumab discontinuation were corticosteroid use (HR 1.46) and disease activity above median (HR 1.29) at golimumab initiation.

CONCLUSION

Based on this retrospective analysis of the BIOBADASER registry, nearly two-fifths (37.7%) of adult rheumatology patients initiating golimumab will remain on treatment for 8 years, with a higher probability of retention in axial SpA or PsA indications and when golimumab is used as first biologic.

Rituximab, a Safer Option for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comparison of the Reported Adverse Events of Approved Monoclonal Antibodies

Background & Objectives

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which are commonly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA), have been linked to a variety of adverse events (AEs). The objective of the study was to compare the safety profiles of six FDA-approved mAbs (sarilumab, tocilizumab, adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, and rituximab) marketed for the treatment of RA.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct. The manuscript comprised a total of 23 clinical studies. The percentage of patients who had AEs was calculated and presented using box-whisker and forest plots.

Results

Infections and infestations were found to be the most common AEs in RA patients treated with mAbs. Raised alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), and nasopharyngitis were frequently reported. The most common AEs were reported with adalimumab. The highest percentage of patients reporting AEs was associated with golimumab (52%), while rituximab had the fewest AEs (4.9%).

Conclusion

In conclusion, rituximab appears to be a safer treatment option for RA as it is found to be associated with a lower risk of AEs, particularly respiratory infections.

Toward Overcoming Treatment Failure in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by inflammation and bone erosion. The exact mechanism of RA is still unknown, but various immune cytokines, signaling pathways and effector cells are involved. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are commonly used in RA treatment and classified into different categories. Nevertheless, RA treatment is based on a "trial-and-error" approach, and a substantial proportion of patients show failed therapy for each DMARD. Over the past decades, great efforts have been made to overcome treatment failure, including identification of biomarkers, exploration of the reasons for loss of efficacy, development of sequential or combinational DMARDs strategies and approval of new DMARDs. Here, we summarize these efforts, which would provide valuable insights for accurate RA clinical medication. While gratifying, researchers realize that these efforts are still far from enough to recommend specific DMARDs for individual patients. Precision medicine is an emerging medical model that proposes a highly individualized and tailored approach for disease management. In this review, we also discuss the potential of precision medicine for overcoming RA treatment failure, with the introduction of various cutting-edge technologies and big data.

Long-Term Retention Rate of Golimumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Spondyloarthritis in a Real-Life Setting

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, medical records review study of all patients with RA, PsA, and SpA on GLM treatment attending a large rheumatology department from 2010 to 2017. Times from start to end of GLM treatment were collected, as well as sociodemographic, clinical, and safety variables. Golimumab retention rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparison across diseases was analyzed with the Mantel-Haenszel statistic (log-rank test). Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify factors associated with GLM discontinuation.

RESULTS

In the study period, a total of 212 patients (61 RA, 48 PsA, 103 SpA) were prescribed GLM. Retention rates were 72% in the first year, 61% in the second, 56% in the third, and 38% at 5 years. Differences were statistically significant across diseases (median times to GLM discontinuation were 50.2, 46.0, and 38.7 months for RA, SpA, and PsA, respectively) and according to the number of previous biologic therapies (55.2 months in biologic-naive patients vs 14.0 months in patients with ≥2 previous biologics; p < 0.001). The use of concomitant conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs was associated with a lower probability of discontinuation (hazards ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.97). Female sex (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.07-3.17) and having used 2 biologics before GLM (HR, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.76-5.06) were associated with increased discontinuation rates. Twenty-three patients (10.9%) had at least 1 serious adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-life setting, GLM shows appropriate long-term safety-effectiveness ratio.

Subcutaneous golimumab induced and maintained clinical response in a child with a biological-experienced steroid-refractory flare of ulcerative colitis: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Golimumab is a fully human antitumor necrosis monoclonal antibody that can be administered by either subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion. Golimumab is approved for the treatment of the adults with rheumatic diseases, and ulcerative colitis, Whereas in children, golimumab is indicated only for the treatment of active polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. We have written on the off-label use of subcutaneous golimumab, which helped to induce and maintain remission on a low-weight biologically experienced child with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis flare.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 13-year-old pancolitis Syrian boy presented with abdominal pain and six to seven times bloody diarrhea. The child had treated with mesalamine 80 mg/kg/day, azathioprine 2.5 mg/kg/day, infliximab with an induction dose of 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6 followed by 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks. Infliximab did not maintain remission as the patient suffered from two flares that required hospital admission, intravenous corticosteroids, and infliximab escalation. Initial tests disclosed leukocytosis, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, an elevation in C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin. All Stool studies were negative including routine stool cultures, Clostridium difficile toxin, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Cryptosporidium, and microscopy for ova and parasites. A sigmoidoscopy revealed multiple large ulcerations and spontaneous bleeding, colon biopsies were negative for Clostridium difficile and Cytomegalovirus. Cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and adalimumab were unavailable in Syria. Child's parents opposed colectomy as a treatment option.

DIAGNOSIS

Ulcerative colitis flare.

INTERVENTIONS

A subcutaneous golimumab with a loading dose of 200 mg at week 0, followed by 100 mg at week 2, then 50 mg every 4 weeks.

OUTCOMES

The patient achieved clinical remission by week sixth and maintained the remission for the next 90 weeks. At the time of last evaluation, tests, including C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin, were within normal limits, complete colonoscopy revealed erythema, edema, mucosal friability, loss of vascular patterns, and pseudo-polyps. The Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index and Mayo scores were 5 and 2 points, respectively. No adverse events were documented.

CONCLUSION

Golimumab has shown potential efficacy and safety in the treatment of ulcerative colitis in children which may indicate a significant future role for subcutaneous golimumab in pediatrics ulcerative colitis.

Budget Impact of Sequential Treatment with Biologics, Biosimilars, and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Thai Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Targeted treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) includes biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) and JAK inhibitors (JAKi). These agents are recommended at the same level on the basis of their efficacy and safety data. However, no local evidence of the impact of RA treatment regimens on total budget spending is available to date. This study aimed to explore the budget impact of different sequential targeted treatments in Thai patients with RA who failed at least three conventional synthetic DMARDs.

METHODS

We used the adapted model to evaluate the budget impact of adding tofacitinib in different order to RA targeted treatment regimens. The Thai RA population eligible for treatment was assessed on the basis of local prevalence and experts' opinion. Cost-impact analysis was evaluated for the treatment sequences of four different lines of targeted therapies using inputs like clinical efficacy, safety, and costs. The model used a decision tree structure with treatment nodes corresponding to treatment response outcomes for a cohort of patients. The comparisons included five bDMARDs [etanercept (ETN), infliximab (IFX), golimumab (GOL), rituximab (RTX), tocilizumab (TCZ) intravenous formulation], two JAKi [tofacitinib (TOF) and baricitinib (BAR)], and two IFX biosimilars (PF-06438179/GP1111 and CT-P13). A total of 80 treatment sequences within each containing four sequential first-, second-, third-, and fourth-line options were generated.

RESULTS

The findings of the base case scenario indicated the treatment sequence with RTX as first-line, followed by IFX biosimilar (PF-06438179/GP1111), TOF, and TCZ, respectively, produced the lowest budget impact of US $693.54 million. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of our findings.

CONCLUSION

The order of targeted therapy starting with RTX, then IFX biosimilar, TOF, and finally TCZ incurred the lowest budget impact over a 5-year time horizon for treating moderate to severe RA. Our findings may help payers and policy makers consider appropriate budget allocation on chronic non-communicable diseases, especially RA.

GO-BEYOND: a real-world study of persistence of golimumab in patients with axial spondyloarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in Turkey

Aim: To evaluate the retention rate of golimumab (GLM) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA). Materials & methods: Patients had received/were receiving GLM as their first or second biological drug for at least 3 months. We recorded demographic and clinical data, data on drug continuation and disease activity. Patients were classified as biologic-naive and biologic-experienced. Results: The study included 60 RA and 269 ax-SpA patients. At month 24, the retention rates were 67.2 and 57.1% (biologic-naive and biologic-experienced RA) and 74.8 and 80.4% (anti-TNF-naive and -experienced ax-SpA). No significant differences in retention were observed between the biologic-naive and -experienced groups for either disease. Conclusion: The results of this study confirm the effectiveness of GLM in the treatment of RA and axSpA with good retention rates at 2 years in a real-world setting in Turkey.

Long-term Use of Golimumab in Daily Practice for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and drug retention rate of golimumab (GLM) for long-term use in daily practice for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Patients with RA who started GLM therapy with a minimum follow-up period of 52 weeks were included. The patients were divided into a biologic-naïve group and switch group. The disease activity score (DAS) 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (DAS28-ESR), grip power, and Japanese version of the health assessment questionnaire (J-HAQ) score were assessed. In addition, the treatment continuation rate was evaluated at the final follow-up. Patients Sixty-five patients [58 women and 7 men; median (range) age, 69 (61-74) years; median (range) disease duration, 9 (5-16) years] were included. Twenty-eight patients were biologic-naïve (naïve group), and 37 were switched to biologics (switch group). Results The median (range) follow-up period was 134 (58-162) weeks. The DAS28-ESR improved from a median (range) of 4.31 (3.52-5.25) to 2.65 (2.28-3.77) in the naïve group and from 4.27 (3.19-4.89) to 2.89 (2.49-3.88) in the switch group. The grip power improved in both groups (p<0.01); however, the J-HAQ score showed no marked improvement in either group. The continuation rates were 22/28 (78.6%) in the naïve group, and 26/37 (70.3%) in the switch group at the final follow-up. Conclusion We herein report for the first time that the long-term use of GLM improves the grip power. Improving the grip power may help prevent sarcopenia and frailty in the future. Given the efficacy and high continuation rate, we suggest that GLM would be a well-tolerated treatment option for RA.

Factors associated with long-term retention of treatment with golimumab in rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis: an analysis of the Spanish BIOBADASER registry

BACKGROUND

Retention of biological treatment provides a marker of drug effectiveness and patient satisfaction. Retention of golimumab was high in clinical trial extensions and real-world studies up to 5 years in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the probability of real-world long-term retention of treatment with golimumab up to 7 years after treatment initiation.

METHODS

This retrospective noninterventional study involved analysis of the Spanish biological drugs registry, BIOBADASER. Adults who had ever received golimumab for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), or psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and had initiated it > 6 months before the analysis date, were included.

RESULTS

Among 685 patients (28.5% RA, 42.9% SpA, 28.6% PsA), the overall probability of retention of golimumab treatment since initiation was 71.7% (95% confidence interval 68.1-74.9) at year 1, 60.5% (56.5-64.2%) at year 2, 55.6% (51.5-59.5%) at year 3, 50.6% (46.2-54.8%) at year 4, 45.1% (40.1-50.0%) at year 5, 44.2% (39.0-49.3) at year 6, and 39.5% (32.8-46.2) at year 7. Retention was greater in patients with axial SpA or PsA versus RA (p < 0.001) and when golimumab was used as first-line treatment versus third or later lines (p < 0.001). Factors associated with greater golimumab retention in Cox regression included use as first-line biological therapy, having axial SpA or PsA rather than RA, and concomitant methotrexate therapy. Steroids were associated with lower retention.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world study of RA, axial SpA, and PsA patients, the retention rate of golimumab was 39.5% at year 7. Key Points • Retention of biological treatment provides a marker of drug effectiveness and patient satisfaction. • This real-world study of 685 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) showed that golimumab treatment had a retention rate up to 39.5% at year 7. • Greater golimumab retention was associated with use as first-line biological therapy, having axial SpA or PsA rather than RA, and concomitant methotrexate therapy.

Golimumab improves socio economic and health economic parameters in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis

BACKGROUND

Golimumab (GLM) has shown its efficacy and safety in various clinical trials. We aimed to assess the effect of GLM on socio economic and health economic parameters in daily clinical practice.

SETTING

Rheumatology offices in Germany.

METHOD

Analysis of socio economic and health economic parameters of the non-interventional, multicentre, prospective study GO-NICE. Analyses were performed in an exploratory manner using descriptive statistical methods. Further, p-values on socio economic variables were calculated based on one-sample t-test on the differences between baseline and follow-up visits.

RESULTS

A total of 1458 patients were evaluable, of whom a total of 664 patients completed the 24-month observation period. The proportions of hospitalizations decreased statistically significantly (p ≤ .05) from 10.4/7.6/14.0% at baseline (BL) to 1.7/2.2/0.8%, and the in-patient rehabilitations decreased from 3.3/3.7/7.5% at BL to 0.6/1.8/2.1% at month 24 in patients with RA, PsA, and AS. When considering a 30-day period, the mean number of sick leave days decreased statistically significantly (p ≤ .005) from 4.0 at BL to 0.9 at month 24 (greatest improvement in RA), and the mean number of days with impaired capability decreased statistically significantly (p ≤ .001) from 14.9 at BL to 4.5 at month 24 (greatest improvement in patients with AS). There was also a reduction in the number of consultations and remedies.

CONCLUSION

This evaluation shows improvements in socio economic and health economic parameters on GLM treatment.

Golimumab as the First-, Second-, or at Least Third-Line Biologic Agent in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, or Ankylosing Spondylitis: Post Hoc Analysis of a Noninterventional Study in Germany

INTRODUCTION

While golimumab (GLM) has demonstrated efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in several randomized clinical trials with biologic-naïve patients, observational data from biologic-experienced patients are sparse. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of GLM used as the first-, second-, or at least third-line biologic agent in RA, PsA, and AS patients in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of the noninterventional, prospective, 24-month GO-NICE study of RA, PsA, and AS patients who initiated GLM 50 mg subcutaneously once monthly in a real-world setting in Germany.

RESULTS

In 1454 patients with RA, PsA, or AS, GLM was administered as the first-line (n = 305, 286, 292, respectively), second-line (n = 104, 136, 130, respectively), or at least third-line (n = 64, 79, 58, respectively) biologic agent. In RA patients (n = 473), the time since first diagnosis was 9.7, 10.1, and 14.3 years, respectively. The DAS28 score at BL was 5.0, 4.9, and 5.1 in patients using GLM as a first-, second-, and third-line biologic agent, respectively, and dropped significantly in all groups. After 3 months of treatment, 27.5%, 19.5%, and 14.5% of patients were in remission; the corresponding values after 24 months were 45.3%, 50.0%, and 33.3%, respectively. In PsA patients (n = 501), time since fist diagnosis was 12.4, 13.7, and 13.8 years, respectively. Based on PsARC, a response was achieved at 24 months in the first-, second-, and third-line use of GLM in 76.4%, 51.0%, and 50.0% of the patients. In AS patients (n = 480), the time since first diagnosis was 9.4, 9.8, and 12.4 years in patients using GLM as the first-, second-, and at least third-line biologic agent, respectively. After 24 months of treatment, the mean BASDAI scores decreased significantly (p < 0.001 vs. BL) to 2.1, 2.9, and 2.9 in the patients using GLM as the first-, second-, and at least third-line treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Golimumab is an effective treatment in patients with RA, PsA, and AS, irrespective of any pretreatment with biologic agents.

STUDY REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01313858.

Singapore Chapter of Rheumatologists updated consensus statement on the eligibility for government subsidization of biologic and targeted-synthetic therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 30% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) respond inadequately to conventional-synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). However, widespread use of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and targeted-synthetic (tsDMARDs) is limited by cost. We formulated updated recommendations for eligibility criteria for government-assisted funding of bDMARDs/tsDMARDs for RA patients in Singapore.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Published guidelines regarding use of bDMARD and tsDMARDs were reviewed. We excluded those without a systematic literature review, formal consensus process or evidence grading. Separately, unpublished national reimbursement guidelines were included.

RESULTS

Eleven recommendations regarding choice of disease activity measure, initiation, order of selection and continuation of bDMARD/tsDMARDs were formulated. A bDMARD/tsDMARD is indicated if a patient has: (a) at least moderately active RA with a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints/erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) score of ≥3.2; (b) failed ≥2 csDMARD strategies, 1 of which must be a combination; (c) received an adequate dose regimen of ≥3 months for each strategy. For the first-line bDMARD/tsDMARD, either tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), non-TNFi (abatacept, tocilizumab, rituximab), or tsDMARDs, may be considered. If a first-line TNFi fails, options include another TNFi, non-TNFi biologic or tsDMARDs. If a first-line non-TNFi biologic or tsDMARD fails, options include TNFi or another non-TNF biologic or tsDMARD. For continued bDMARD/tsDMARD subsidization, a patient must have a documented DAS28-ESR every 3 months and at least a moderate European League Against Rheumatism response by 6 months.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations are useful for guiding funding decisions, making bDMARD/tsDMARDs usage accessible and equitable in RA patients who fail csDMARDs.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous golimumab plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged < 65 years and those ≥ 65 years of age

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous golimumab + methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aged < 65 years and those ≥ 65 years who were enrolled in the GO-FURTHER study.

METHODS

In the phase III, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled GO-FURTHER trial, patients with active RA were randomized to intravenous (IV) golimumab 2 mg/kg + MTX or placebo + MTX at weeks 0 and 4, then every 8 weeks thereafter (with crossover to golimumab at week 16 [early escape] or week 24 [per-protocol]). The final golimumab infusion was at week 100. Assessments included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response criteria. Efficacy and adverse events (AEs) were monitored through 2 years. Efficacy and AEs were summarized for patients aged < 65 years or ≥ 65 years; AEs were also summarized for patients < or ≥ 70 years and patients < or ≥ 75 years.

RESULTS

In GO-FURTHER, 592 patients were randomized to receive placebo (n = 197) or golimumab (n = 395), 515 were aged < 65 years and 77 were ≥ 65 years. At week 24, ACR20 response rates were greater for golimumab + MTX patients compared with placebo + MTX for patients < 65 years (61.6% vs 31.3%, p < 0.001) and those ≥ 65 years (69.5% vs 33.3%; p < 0.01). Infections were the most common AE through week 112 (51.6% in patients < 65 years; 55.3% in patients ≥ 65 years); upper respiratory infections were the most common infection in patients < 65 years (13.2%) and those ≥ 65 years (11.8%). Serious AEs occurred in 17.7% in patients < 65 years and 25.0% of patients ≥ 65 years and included malignancies, pneumonia, fractures, acute pancreatitis, cellulitis, and bacterial arthritis.

CONCLUSIONS

In GO-FURTHER, ACR response rates were similar between patients < 65 years and patients ≥ 65 years within each treatment group. AEs in elderly patients were similar to the known safety profile of IV golimumab. Immunosenescence is known to increase the risk of infections in the elderly. Elderly patients had a numerically higher incidence of serious infections. Six malignancies occurred in golimumab-treated patients, all in patients < 65 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00973479 . Registered September 9, 2009.

Cardiovascular safety of tocilizumab: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to compare the cardiovascular safety of tocilizumab and other biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) in rheumatoid arthritis using a network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

A systematic literature search through May 2018 identified randomized controlled trials (RCT) or observational studies (cohort only) reporting cardiovascular outcomes of tocilizumab (TCZ) and/or abatacept (ABA) and/or rituximab (RTX) and/or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in rheumatoid arthritis patients. The composite primary outcome was the rate of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes (MACE, myocardial infarction (MI), peripheral artery disease (PAD) and cardiac heart failure (CHF)).

RESULTS

19 studies were included in the NMA, including 11 RCTs and 8 cohort studies. We found less events with RTX (5.41 [1.70;17.26]. We found no difference between TCZ and other treatments. Concerning MI, we found no difference between TCZ and csDMARD (4.23 [0.22;80.64]), no difference between TCZ and TNFi (2.00 [0.18;21.84]). There was no difference between TCZ and csDMARD (1.51[0.02;103.50] and between TCZ and TNFi (1.00 [0.06;15.85]) for stroke event. With cohorts and RCT NMA, we found no difference between TCZ and other treatments for MACE (0.66 [0.42;1.03] with ABA, 1.04 [0.60;1.81] with RTX, 0.78[0.53;1.16] and 0.91 [0.54;1.51] with csDMARD), but the risk of myocardial infarction was lower with TCZ compared to ABA (0.67 [0.47;0.97]). We lacked data to compare TCZ and other bDMARD for stoke and MI. Not enough data was available to perform a NMA for CHF and PAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an increase in cholesterol levels, TCZ has safe cardiovascular outcomes compared to other bDMARD.

Real-world treatment persistence of golimumab in the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases in Europe: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES

To summarise real-world data from studies reporting golimumab persistence in European immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) populations and to report pooled estimates.

DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant literature was identified through searching Medline and Embase via Ovid as well as the conference databases of European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology-Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We screened records using predefined patients, interventions, comparators, outcomes and study design criteria. Eligible studies included reports of persistence among adult IMRD patients in Europe receiving treatment with subcutaneous golimumab. Clinical trials, randomised controlled trials, literature reviews, editorials, guidelines and studies with <20 patients receiving golimumab were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Following double screening by two independent reviewers, 27 studies out of 578 identified records were selected for inclusion and subsequent data extraction. Persistence was most commonly reported at 12and 24 months; hence, pooled persistence estimates were calculated for these two time points and reported according to indication.

RESULTS

Persistence ranged between 58.1% (psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients regardless of treatment line) and 75.7% (biological-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients) at 12 months; at 24 months, the range was 43% (axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) patients regardless of treatment line) and 69.6% (biological-naïve PsA patients). On the basis of data from 12 studies, persistence with golimumab treatment was either significantly higher or not significantly different from other tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).

CONCLUSIONS

Golimumab persistence at 24 months approximates 50%, with a lower persistence among AxSpA (43%) patients. However, as the number of studies in these populations was low, they warrant further research. In 12 studies comparing various TNFi treatments, golimumab was shown to have significantly better or equal persistence to its comparators.

Golimumab for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Since the advent of infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), new genetically-engineered molecules have appeared. This review aims to present the current data and body of evidence for golimumab (GLM). Safety, efficacy, tolerability and immunogenicity are all being investigated, not only through phase III trials (GO-BEFORE, GO-FORWARD, GO-AFTER, GO-MORE, GO-FURTHER, GO-NICE), but also through studies of real-world data. It seems that GLM in the subcutaneous form is an efficacious molecule with a good safety profile at the standard dosage scheme, but a 100 mg subcutaneous dose is associated with a higher risk of opportunistic infections, lymphoma and demyelination. Furthermore, when compared to other tumor necrosis factor-α molecules, it is non-inferior, and, at some points, such as when it comes to immunogenicity and persistence of the drug, it has a better profile. In summary, GLM is an effective, well-tolerated option for the treatment of RA, for both the clinician and patients who are seeking a convenient dosage scheme.

Patient-reported outcomes with golimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis: non-interventional study GO-NICE in Germany

The TNF inhibitor golimumab (GLM) is a treatment option in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The GO-NICE study assessed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in patients newly treated with monthly GLM 50 mg subcutaneously (SC) under real-life conditions in Germany. A prospective non-interventional study with 24-month observation per patient was conducted at 158 sites. Available for analysis were 1,458 patients, 474 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA: 54.9 ± 13.4 years, 72.8% females, 60.4% biologic-naïve), 501 with psoriatic arthritis (PsA: 50.5 ± 12.1 years, 54.1% females; 47.5% biologic-naïve), and 483 with ankylosing spondylitis (AS: 43.6 ± 12.3 years, 66.5% males; 58.4% biologic-naïve). A total of 664 patients completed follow-up to month 24. An improvement of QoL by EuroQoL EQ-5D-3L was seen after 6 months and was maintained over 24 months. The patients’ health state today (EQ visual analog scale) improved statistically significantly (p < 0.0001 vs. BL) from 51.0 at baseline (BL) to 63.4 (RA), from 48.4 to 64.3 (PsA) and from 46.8 to 66.5 (AS). Functional ability (FFbH) improved significantly (p < 0.003 vs. BL) from BL 68.2 to 76.1 points (RA), from 69.0 to 76.8 points (PsA), and from 69.0 to 78.5 points (AS). The mean FACIT-Fatigue score increased significantly (p < 0.0001 vs. BL) from BL 32.4 to 38.3 points (RA), from 30.0 to 35.9 points (PsA), and from 29.9 to 37.9 points after 24 months (AS); p < 0.0001 vs. BL each. On treatment with GLM SC once monthly, significant improvements in patient-reported QoL parameters were noted in a very similar manner in all three diseases.

Trial registration ClinTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01313858. Registered March 14, 2011; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT01313858.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis: effect of biologics on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis

AIM

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of biologics in inhibiting radiographic progression among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Bayesian network meta-analysis of published trials investigating the USA FDA approved biologics treatment in RA patients, using methotrexate (MTX) as the reference comparator.

RESULTS

Nine trials met the inclusion criteria for base case analysis. Compared with MTX, most biologics (except golimumab) + MTX had significantly lower rates of radiographic progression at 1 year. Mean difference in radiographic progression rates between MTX monotherapy and biologics + MTX was highest for adalimumab + MTX (-3.8) and lowest for tocilizumab + MTX (-0.7). Inhibition of radiographic progression was sustained.

CONCLUSION

Biologics inhibit radiographic progression in patients with RA at 1 year; however, published evidence beyond 1 year is limited.

Persistence with Biological Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Its Associated Resource Utilization and Costs

Objective

The study assessed persistence rates of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Japan and compared resource utilization and treatment costs between persistence and non-persistence groups.

Methods

Data were extracted from a Japanese claims database between 2009 and 2015. bDMARD-naïve patients were identified and included in the final analysis. Survival analysis was used to estimate 1-year persistence rates for current bDMARDs. Propensity score matching was applied to control for potential treatment selection bias. Resource utilization and healthcare costs were calculated 1 year before and after initiation of bDMARDs and compared between persistence and non-persistence groups.

Results

A total of 6153 bDMARD-naïve patients were identified and the overall 1-year persistence rate was 85% (95% CI 84–86). Overall, 1-year outpatient visits increased from 10 at baseline to 16 after bDMARD treatment, while the number of hospital admissions declined from 3.3 to 1.6. The non-persistence group had a larger increase in outpatient visits after bDMARD initiation compared with the persistence group (8–16 vs. 10–16, respectively) and a smaller decrease in hospital admissions (3.1–1.9 vs. 3.5–1.4, respectively). Persistence was associated with a reduction in total healthcare costs of US$760.

Conclusions

Japanese bDMARD-naïve patients with RA have a high persistence rate with those treatments. The reduction in medication costs in non-persistent patients is offset by higher hospitalization costs, making non-persistence more expensive.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40801-018-0139-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effectiveness and safety of golimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis under real-life clinical conditions: non-interventional GO-NICE study in Germany

OBJECTIVE

The Non Interventional Evaluation with Golumimab (GO-NICE) study aimed to document patient and treatment characteristics as well as clinical effectiveness and safety in adult patients newly treated with the tumour necrosis factor inhibitor golimumab (GLM).

DESIGN

Prospective non-interventional study with 24-month observation per patient.

SETTING

158 office-based and clinical-based physicians in Germany.

INTERVENTION

GLM administered in the 50 mg dose subcutaneously in monthly intervals under real-life conditions.

RESULTS

Of the 1613 included patients, 1458 patients were eligible for final analysis: 474 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA, 54.9±13.4 years, 72.8% women, 64.7% biologic-naïve), 501 with psoriatic arthritis (PsA, 50.5±12.1 years, 54.1% women, 56.5% biologic-naïve) and 483 with ankylosing spondylitis (AS, 43.6±12.3 years, 66.5% men, 61.0% biologic-naïve). 664 patients completed follow-up (2-year retention rate 45.5%). Disease Activity Score 28-joint count erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) decreased from 5.0 to 2.9 after 24 months (p<0.0001) in patients with RA, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Index score decreased from 5.1 to 2.4 (p<0.0001) in patients with AS. Response rate calculated in patients with PsA by modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria was 67.9% after 24 months. Most adverse events were of mild or moderate nature, and no new safety signals were detected. According to the physicians' clinical assessments, treatment with GLM was successful (no adverse drug reaction and a clear or moderate therapeutic effect in an individual patient) in 55.0%-56.6% of patients with RA, PsA and AS, respectively, at month 3, increasing from 74.5% to 76.1% at month 24.

CONCLUSIONS

GLM subcutaneously once monthly led to substantial improvements in clinical effectiveness in patients with various inflammatory rheumatic diseases who could be followed up in a real-life setting in Germany. The treatment was well tolerated, and the safety profile of GLM was consistent with that observed in the previous randomised controlled trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01313858.

Golimumab: A Review in Inflammatory Arthritis

Golimumab (Simponi^®), a fully human monoclonal antibody against tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα), is given once monthly by subcutaneous injection. In the EU, golimumab is approved as monotherapy and/or in combination with methotrexate for the treatment of inflammatory arthritis, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis [comprising ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA)] in adults, and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) in children. These approvals were based on the observations that golimumab was generally well tolerated and conferred some or all of the following benefits in pivotal studies in these settings: reduced signs and symptoms of arthritis; improved physical functioning and health-related quality of life; and slowed radiographic progression. Of note, data from long-term extensions (LTEs) of pivotal studies in RA, PsA and AS have confirmed that the safety and efficacy of golimumab are sustained through 5 years of treatment; the long-term tolerability profile of the drug is similar to that of other TNFα inhibitors (TNFis). Like other subcutaneous TNFis, golimumab offers patients the convenience and flexibility of home-based self-injection, although it has the added potential advantage of requiring less frequent administration, in particular compared with older, first generation agents, such as etanercept and adalimumab. Thus, golimumab is an effective, generally well tolerated and potentially convenient option for the treatment of RA, PsA, AS and nr-axSpA in adults, and pJIA in children.

A review on golimumab in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) causes inflammation in and around the joints and usually affects people who already have psoriasis. However, some patients develop the joint problems before the psoriasis. Currently, there are five anti-TNF-α agents licensed for use in patients with PsA: adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab and infliximab. Golimumab, a human monoclonal antibody, has been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of PsA and is targeted against the pro-inflammatory molecule TNF-α. The Phase III GO-REVEAL study confirmed this drug was well tolerated and showed significant improvement in disease activity compared with placebo.

Biologics that inhibit the Th17 pathway and related cytokines to treat inflammatory disorders

INTRODUCTION

Advances in the understanding of TNF-α and IL-17 synergistic functions have recently led to the concept that patients who do not respond or who respond inadequately to TNF-α inhibitors may have IL-17-driven diseases, opening up the way for a new class of therapeutic development: Th17-inhibitors. Areas covered: In this review, the authors discuss the central role that the IL-23/Th17 axis plays in the pathogenesis of several inflammatory diseases, such as psoriasis, highlighting its position as a relevant therapeutic target. In particular, the authors start by giving a brief historical excursus on biologic agent development up until the success of TNF-α inhibitors, and continue with an overview of IL12/23 pathway inhibition. Next, they describe Th17 cell biology, focusing on the role of IL-17 in host defense and in human immune-inflammatory diseases, discussing the use and side effects of IL-17 inhibitors. Expert opinion: The IL-23/Th17 signaling pathway plays a central role in the pathogenesis of several inflammatory diseases, such as psoriasis. Recent data has demonstrated that biologics neutralizing IL-17 (ixekizumab, secukinumab) or its receptor (brodalumab) are highly effective with a positive safety profile in treating moderate to severe psoriasis, offering new treatment possibilities, especially for patients who do not respond adequately to anti-TNF-α therapies.

Persistence with golimumab in immune-mediated rheumatic diseases: a systematic review of real-world evidence in rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis

PURPOSE

In immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs), persistence to treatment may be used as a surrogate marker for long-term treatment success. In previous comparisons of persistence to tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors (TNFis), a paucity of data for subcutaneous (SC) golimumab was identified. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of persistence to SC golimumab in clinical practice and contextualize these data with five-year persistence estimates from long-term open-label extension (OLE) trials of SC TNFis in IMRDs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and conference proceedings from European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), American College of Rheumatology (ACR), and International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) were searched. All studies on patients treated with SC golimumab for IMRD were included if they reported data on the persistence to golimumab.

RESULTS

Of 376 available references identified through the searches, 12 studies with a total of 4,910 patients met the inclusion criteria. Furthermore, nine OLE trials were available. Among the included studies from clinical practice, at six months, one year, two years, and three years, the proportion of patients persistent to treatment ranged from 63% to 91%, 47% to 80%, 40% to 77%, and 32% to 67%, respectively. In the four studies that included comparisons to other biologics, golimumab was either statistically noninferior or statistically superior to other treatments, an observation that was supported by indirect comparisons of unadjusted point estimates of OLE trials.

CONCLUSION

The data reviewed in this study indicate that golimumab may have higher persistence than other TNFis, a notion that is supported by indirect comparisons of persistence data from OLEs of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Furthermore, the study suggests that persistence may be lower in biologic-experienced compared with biologic-naive patients and higher in axial spondyloarthritis compared with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

Five-year Safety Data from 5 Clinical Trials of Subcutaneous Golimumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

Assess 5-year golimumab (GOL) safety in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

Subcutaneous (SC) GOL (50 mg or 100 mg every 4 weeks) was evaluated in phase 3 trials of patients with active RA, PsA, and AS. Safety data through Year 5 were pooled across 3 RA trials [1 each evaluating methotrexate (MTX)-naive, MTX-experienced, and antitumor necrosis factor (TNF)-experienced patients], 1 PsA trial, and 1 AS trial. Data summarized was derived from both placebo-controlled (through weeks 24-52) and uncontrolled study periods. For adverse events (AE) of special interest [serious infections (SI), opportunistic infections (OI), deaths, malignancies, demyelination, tuberculosis (TB)], incidence per 100 patient-years (pt-yrs) was determined.

RESULTS

Across all trials, 639 patients received placebo and 2228 received SC GOL 50 mg only (n = 671), 50 mg and 100 mg (n = 765), or 100 mg only (n = 792). Safety followup extended for averages of 28.5 and 203.2 weeks for placebo and GOL, respectively. Respective placebo and GOL AE incidence/100 pt-yrs (95% CI) through Year 5 were 4.86 (2.83-7.78) and 3.29 (2.92-3.69) for SI, 0.00 (0.00-0.86) and 0.23 (0.14-0.35) for TB, 0.00 (0.00-0.86) and 0.22 (0.13-0.34) for OI, 0.00 (0.00-0.86) and 0.10 (0.05-0.20) for lymphoma, 0.00 (0.00-0.86) and 0.08 (0.03-0.17) for demyelination, and 0.29 (0.01-1.59) and 0.41 (0.29-0.57) for death. TB, OI, lymphoma, and demyelination incidence appeared to be higher among patients receiving GOL 100 mg only.

CONCLUSION

SC GOL safety through Year 5 remained consistent with previously reported Year 3 findings and with other TNF antagonists. Numerically higher incidences of TB, OI, lymphoma, and demyelination were observed with 100 mg versus 50 mg. Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT00264537 (GO-BEFORE), NCT00264550 (GO-FORWARD), NCT00299546 (GO-AFTER), NCT00265096 (GO-REVEAL), and NCT00265083 (GO-RAISE).

Golimumab for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Anti-TNF agents are the mainstay of therapy in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) not responding to 5-aminosalisylic acid, corticosteroids, immunmodulators and for patients dependent on corticosteroids. There is a therapeutic gap of 30%- 60% with infliximab and adalimumab, which is required to be bridged by newer agents. The present review summarizes the literature on the role of golimumab, a new anti TNF agent, in ulcerative colitis.

AREAS COVERED

Literature search was done on PubMed using the search terms 'golimumab' AND 'ulcerative colitis' from inception till March 2016. Golimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against TNF-α, was approved by FDA for clinical use in UC in 2013. In vitro studies showed golimumab to be better than infliximab and adalimumab in terms of affinity and neutralization of TNF-α and its conformational stability. Golimumab was found to be effective and safe in inducing and maintaining clinical remission, clinical response and mucosal healing in patients with UC in the two registration trials. Expert commentary: Although there is no difference in terms of efficacy between golimumab, infliximab and adalimumab, golimumab is better than infliximab in terms of route of administration (subcutaneous vs intravenous) and better than adalimumab in terms of frequency of dosing (4 weeks vs 2 weeks).