An Open-label, Phase II Study of the Safety and Tolerability of Pirfenidone in Patients with Scleroderma-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: the LOTUSS Trial

Advances in management of pulmonary fibrosis

Pulmonary fibrosis care, affecting both idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and other forms of interstitial lung disease (ILD) characterised by fibrosis, has transformed with a range of innovations that affect the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of this condition. Pharmacotherapeutic options have expanded, with increased indications for the application of effective antifibrotic therapy in non-IPF progressive pulmonary fibrosis as a solo treatment or combined with immunosuppression, emerging evidence for immunomodulatory therapy including biologic agents and greater access to clinical trials. The diagnostic approach to unclassifiable ILD now includes transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, a less invasive method to obtain histopathology with reduced morbidity and mortality compared to surgical lung biopsy. A multidisciplinary approach optimises the care of people with ILD and includes non-pharmacological management, addressing significant comorbidities, symptom care and advanced care planning. This review will summarise recent updates in pulmonary fibrosis management.

[Antifibrotic therapies: Where do we stand 10years later?]

INTRODUCTION

Fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are severe respiratory conditions that can lead to respiratory failure and death. Over the past decade, antifibrotic therapies have represented a significant therapeutic advancement and are now widely used.

STATE OF THE ART

Pirfenidone and nintedanib have been approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), while only nintedanib has been approved for systemic sclerosis-related ILD and progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). Both drugs help to reduce the decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) characterizing these three indications and to decrease mortality, acute exacerbations, and quality of life impairment in patients with IPF and PPF.

PERSPECTIVES

Tolerance to these treatments remains a major challenge, prompting evaluation of alternative administration routes, such as inhalation. Numerous ongoing clinical trials and encouraging results from phase 3 studies are expected to lead to the approval of new antifibrotic molecules.

CONCLUSIONS

Antifibrotic therapies have proven to be crucial in the management of IPF and PPF. Prescription should be a shared decision with the patient and may be considered at an early stage, even in elderly individuals, provided that dedicated support is avaialble.

Antifibrotic therapeutic strategies in systemic sclerosis: Critical role of the Wnt/β-catenin and TGF-β signal transduction pathways as potential targets

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a prototypic fibrosing disorder characterized by widespread fibrosis and immune dysregulation. Current evidence highlights the intricate cross-talk between the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) signaling, both of which play fundamental roles in the pathogenesis of fibrosis. This review aims to elucidate the central role of the Wnt/β-catenin-TGF-β pathway and TGF-β signal transduction pathway in fibrotic diseases, focusing on SSc. We summarized evidence from cellular biology studies, animal model investigations, and clinical observations to provide a comprehensive view of the mechanisms by which these pathways cause pathological fibrosis. In addition, we explore the possibilities of antifibrotic therapeutic strategies against Wnt/β-catenin-TGF-β signaling to counteract fibrosis. We aim to delineate approaches towards effectively treating fibrosis in SSc by targeting these interconnected signaling pathways.

Optimising pirfenidone dosage regimens in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: towards a guide for personalised treatment

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic respiratory disorder for which pirfenidone is the recommended first-line anti-fibrotic treatment. While pirfenidone has demonstrated efficacy in slowing the progression of IPF, its use is associated with several challenges and unresolved issues that impact patient outcomes. Pirfenidone administration can result in gastrointestinal side effects, photosensitivity reactions, and significant drug interactions, particularly in patients with hepatic impairment. For those who experience intolerable side effects, dose reductions or temporary discontinuations are frequently employed. However, there is limited data on the efficacy of reduced doses, creating uncertainty about the balance between tolerability and therapeutic benefit.The aim of this study is to evaluate the currently proposed dosage adjustments and to develop new dosage regimens tailored to the needs of patients. Simulations were conducted to explore pirfenidone pharmacokinetics under various challenging conditions, including dose titration, withdrawal, retitration, moderate and severe hepatic impairment, co-administration of moderate (e.g. omeprazole) and strong (e.g. smoking) inducers of the CYP1A2 enzyme, gastrointestinal adverse events, and photosensitivity reactions.Simulations led to specific recommendations for physicians regarding dosage regimens in each condition. The recommended dosage adjustments are designed to maintain concentrations within acceptable levels, ensuring both safe and effective treatment.

Targeting extracellular matrix stiffness for cancer therapy

The physical characteristics of the tumor microenvironment (TME) include solid stress, interstitial fluid pressure, tissue stiffness and microarchitecture. Among them, abnormal changes in tissue stiffness hinder drug delivery, inhibit infiltration of immune killer cells to the tumor site, and contribute to tumor resistance to immunotherapy. Therefore, targeting tissue stiffness to increase the infiltration of drugs and immune cells can offer a powerful support and opportunities to improve the immunotherapy efficacy in solid tumors. In this review, we discuss the mechanical properties of tumors, the impact of a stiff TME on tumor cells and immune cells, and the strategies to modulate tumor mechanics.

Patient-centered care in pulmonary fibrosis: access, anticipate, and act

Comprehensive care integrates individual patient needs and is highly valued for patients with pulmonary fibrosis (PF). The importance of a patient-centered care approach is rooted in the unpredictable progressiveness of the disease course in PF. The respiratory impairment associated with PF has a major impact on the quality of life for both patients and their caregivers. We believe that prioritizing patient preferences could improve the shared decision making process and may ultimately lead to better health outcomes. Despite the growing emphasis for this approach, it remains challenging to adopt it in clinical practice. In this review, we propose the comprehensive Triple A Care Model, consisting of the domains Access, Anticipate, and Act, which emphasizes core elements of patient-centered care for patients with PF. We will provide an overview of the unmet needs in care for patients with PF and elaborate on the current methods for delivering patient-centered care. The latest insights into symptom management and supportive measures and several approaches to improving access to care are discussed, in line with the most recent guidelines.

Advancements in the treatment of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis with the approval of mycophenolate mofetil

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune connective tissue disease characterized by widespread fibrosis affecting various organs. This disorder has two main subtypes based on the extent of cutaneous fibrosis (limited and diffuse cutaneous SSc). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurs in approximately 50% and 25% of patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc and limited cutaneous SSc, respectively. In Japan, over 10,000 people are estimated to have ILD. Out of 10,000 SSc-ILD, at least 4000 patients may have slowly progressive ILD which leads to respiratory failure. Treatment of ILD in patients with SSc includes immunosuppressive and anti-fibrotic agents. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is strongly recommended as a first-line immunosuppressive agent for the treatment of SSc-ILD according to recent American Thoracic Society clinical practice guidelines. However, as of February 2024, MMF was only approved in Japan for patients with organ transplants or lupus nephritis through health insurance policies. Cyclophosphamide is an alternative initial immunomodulatory agent for patients with the disease because it has an efficacy comparable to that of MMF. However, this agent had significantly higher toxicity than MMF. For patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis, despite the use of immunosuppressive agents, adding nintedanib or rituximab to MMF or cyclophosphamide is recommended. This review explores the treatment of ILD associated with SSc in Japan with the approval of MMF based on the latest American Thoracic Society guideline.

Use of pirfenidone in fibrotic interstitial lung diseases and beyond: a review

The pathophysiological mechanisms involved in fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (FILDs) are akin to those observed in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), implying the potential for shared therapeutic approaches. Pirfenidone exhibits antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory properties, making it the first small-molecule drug approved for treating IPF. Pirfenidone has been utilized in IPF treatment for more than one decade. However, guidelines for progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) treatment suggest that further research and evidence are needed to fully comprehend its efficacy and safety across various PPF subtypes. In recent years, numerous studies have explored the use of pirfenidone in treating non-IPF FILD. Herein, we provide an overview of the latest research data on application of pirfenidone in occupational-related ILD, connective tissue disease-associated ILD, post-coronavirus disease-2019 pulmonary fibrosis, and other conditions. We summarize the level of evidence and highlight challenges associated with using pirfenidone in different FILDs to offer clinical guidance.

Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by a tripod combining vasculopathy, fibrosis, and immune-mediated inflammatory processes. The prevalence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in SSc varies according to the methods used to detect it, ranging from 25 to 95%. The fibrotic and vascular pulmonary manifestations of SSc, particularly ILD, are the main causes of morbidity and mortality, contributing to 35% of deaths. Although early trials were conducted with cyclophosphamide, more recent randomized controlled trials have been performed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of several medications, mostly mycophenolate, rituximab, tocilizumab, and nintedanib. Although many uncertainties remain, expert consensus is emerging to optimize the therapeutic management and to provide clinicians with evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for patients with SSc-ILD. This article provides an overview, in the light of the latest advances, of the available evidence for the diagnosis and management of SSc-ILD.

Pirfenidone and Nintedanib in Pulmonary Fibrosis: Lights and Shadows

Pirfenidone and Nintedanib are specific drugs used against idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) that showed efficacy in non-IPF fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILD). Both drugs have side effects that affect patients in different ways and have different levels of severity, making treatment even more challenging for patients and clinicians. The present review aims to assess the effectiveness and potential complications of Pirfenidone and Nintedanib treatment regimens across various ILD diseases. A detailed search was performed in relevant articles published between 2018 and 2023 listed in PubMed, UpToDate, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate, supplemented with manual research. The following keywords were searched in the databases in all possible combinations: Nintedanib; Pirfenidone, interstitial lung disease, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The most widely accepted method for evaluating the progression of ILD is through the decline in forced vital capacity (FVC), as determined by respiratory function tests. Specifically, a decrease in FVC over a 6-12-month period correlates directly with increased mortality rates. Antifibrotic drugs Pirfenidone and Nintedanib have been extensively validated; however, some patients reported several side effects, predominantly gastrointestinal symptoms (such as diarrhea, dyspepsia, and vomiting), as well as photosensitivity and skin rashes, particularly associated with Pirfenidone. In cases where the side effects are extremely severe and are more threatening than the disease itself, the treatment has to be discontinued. However, further research is needed to optimize the use of antifibrotic agents in patients with PF-ILDs, which could slow disease progression and decrease all-cause mortality. Finally, other studies are requested to establish the treatments that can stop ILD progression.

Bletilla striata polysaccharide attenuated the progression of pulmonary fibrosis by inhibiting TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Bletilla striata, a traditional medicinal plant, has been utilized as a folk medicine for many years because of its superior biological activity in China. However, Bletilla striata polysaccharide (BSP) has received less attention, and its specific mechanism for ameliorating pulmonary fibrosis is completely unclear.

AIMS OF THE STUDY

In this study, we aim to assess BSP on the treatment of PF and explore potential mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

BSP was successfully extracted and purified from Bletilla striata. The mechanisms were assessed in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis model and lung fibroblasts activated by transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1). Histological analysis, immunofluorescence, Western blot and flow cytometry were used to explore the alterations after BSP intervention.

RESULTS

The results in vivo showed an anti-PF effect of BSP treatment, which reduced pathogenic damages. Furthermore, TGF-β1-induced abnormal migration and upregulated expression of collagen I (COL1A1), vimentin and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) were suppressed by BSP in L929 cells. Moreover, the abnormal proliferation was retarded by inhibiting the cell cycle of G1 to S phase. Immunofluorescence assay showed that BSP activated autophagy and played an antifibrotic role by inhibiting the expression of p62 and phospho-mammalian target of rapamycin (p-mTOR). Last but not least, the suppression of TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway was critical for BSP to perform therapeutic effects in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSION

The possible mechanisms were involved in improving ECM deposition, regulating cell migration and proliferation, and promoting cellular autophagy. Briefly, all of the above revealed that BSP might be a novel therapy for treating pulmonary fibrosis.

KL6 and IL-18 levels are negatively correlated with respiratory function tests and ILD extent assessed on HRCT in patients with systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD)

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the leading causes of mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Serum biomarkers have been suggested as indicators for pulmonary damage with clinical value in the diagnosis and prognosis of SSc-ILD.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of serum biomarkers (Krebs von den Lungen-6 KL-6, IL-18 and IL-18BP) as a potential biomarker reflecting the severity of SSc-ILD as assessed through high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and pulmonary function tests (PFT), including forced vital capacity (%FVC) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (%DLCO).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study including patients with SSc fulfilling the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria was performed. Patients were classified according to disease duration and pulmonary involvement (presence of ILD). All SSc patients underwent chest HRCT scans and pulmonary function test at baseline. Serum concentration of KL-6, IL8 and IL18BP were determined using the quantitative ELISA technique, sandwich type (solid phase sandwich Enzyme Linked-Immuno-Sorbent Assay), with kits from MyBiosource for KL-6 and from Invitrogen for IL18 and IL18BP. A semiquantitative grade of ILD extent was evaluated through HRCT scan (grade 1, 0-20%; grade 2, >20%). Extensive disease was defined as >20% lung involvement on HRCT, and FVC <70% predicted and limited lung involvement as ≤20% ILD involvement on HRCT, and an FVC ≥70% predicted.

RESULTS

74 patients were included, 27% were male. The mean age at diagnosis was 57.5±15 years and the mean time since diagnosis was 7.67±8 years. 28 patients had ILD (38%). 64% of patients had <20% ILD extent classified through HRCT scan. SSc-ILD patients had elevated serum KL-6 and IL-18 levels compared to patients without ILD (p=0.003 and p=0.04), and those findings were preserved after adjusting for age and sex. Negative correlation between KL-6 levels and%FVC (β=-0.25, p 0.037) and% DLCO (β=-0.28, p 0.02) and between IL-18 levels and%FVC (β=-0.38, p 0.001) and%DLCO (β=-0.27, p 0.03) were found. Serum KL-6 and IL-18 levels successfully differentiated grades 1 and 2 of the semiquantitative grades of ILD extent (p = 0.028 and p = 0.022). Semiquantitative grades of ILD on the HRCT scan were significantly proportional to the KL-6 (p = 0.01) and IL-18 (p = 0.03). A positive correlation between extensive lung disease and KL-6 (β=0.42, p = 0.007) but not with IL-18 was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum KL-6 levels and IL-18 were increased in patients with SSc-ILD and showed a positive correlation with ILD severity as measured using a semiquantitative CT grading scale and negative correlation with PFT parameters. Serum KL-6 and IL-18 could be a clinically useful biomarker in screening and evaluating SSc-ILD.

Connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease

Connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) represents a group of systemic autoimmune disorders characterized by immune-mediated organ dysfunction. Systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, idiopathic inflammatory myositis, and Sjögren's syndrome are the most common CTDs that present with pulmonary involvement, as well as with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features. The frequency of CTD-ILD varies according to the type of CTD, but the overall incidence is 15%, causing an important impact on morbidity and mortality. The decision of which CTD patient should be investigated for ILD is unclear for many CTDs. Besides that, the clinical spectrum can range from asymptomatic findings on imaging to respiratory failure and death. A significant proportion of patients will present with a more severe and progressive disease, and, for those, immunosuppression with corticosteroids and cytotoxic medications are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment. In this review, we summarized the approach to diagnosis and treatment of CTD-ILD, highlighting recent advances in therapeutics for the various forms of CTD.

Targeting Progression in Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Overview of Underlying Mechanisms, Molecular Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Intervention

Interstitial lung diseases comprise a heterogenous range of diffuse lung disorders, potentially resulting in pulmonary fibrosis. While idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has been recognized as the paradigm of a progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease, other conditions with a progressive fibrosing phenotype characterized by a significant deterioration of the lung function may lead to a burden of significant symptoms, a reduced quality of life, and increased mortality, despite treatment. There is now evidence indicating that some common underlying biological mechanisms can be shared among different chronic fibrosing disorders; therefore, different biomarkers for disease-activity monitoring and prognostic assessment are under evaluation. Thus, understanding the common pathways that induce the progression of pulmonary fibrosis, comprehending the diversity of these diseases, and identifying new molecular markers and potential therapeutic targets remain highly crucial assignments. The purpose of this review is to examine the main pathological mechanisms regulating the progression of fibrosis in interstitial lung diseases and to provide an overview of potential biomarker and therapeutic options for patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis.

Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Evidence-based Recommendations. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). To date, clinical practice guidelines regarding treatment for patients with SSc-ILD are primarily consensus based. Methods: An international expert guideline committee composed of 24 individuals with expertise in rheumatology, SSc, pulmonology, ILD, or methodology, and with personal experience with SSc-ILD, discussed systematic reviews of the published evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Predetermined conflict-of-interest management strategies were applied, and recommendations were made for or against specific treatment interventions exclusively by the nonconflicted panelists. The confidence in effect estimates, importance of outcomes studied, balance of desirable and undesirable consequences of treatment, cost, feasibility, acceptability of the intervention, and implications for health equity were all considered in making the recommendations. This was in accordance with the American Thoracic Society guideline development process, which is in compliance with the Institute of Medicine standards for trustworthy guidelines. Results: For treatment of patients with SSc-ILD, the committee: 1) recommends the use of mycophenolate; 2) recommends further research into the safety and efficacy of (a) pirfenidone and (b) the combination of pirfenidone plus mycophenolate; and 3) suggests the use of (a) cyclophosphamide, (b) rituximab, (c) tocilizumab, (d) nintedanib, and (e) the combination of nintedanib plus mycophenolate. Conclusions: The recommendations herein provide an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the treatment of patients with SSc-ILD and are intended to serve as the basis for informed and shared decision making by clinicians and patients.

Real-world therapeutic performance of pirfenidone for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases

BACKGROUND

Pirfenidone (PFD) is commonly applied for antifibrotic treatment in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis but has rarely been studied in cases with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases (CTD-ILDs).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine the efficacy of PFD in patients with CTD-ILD based on real-world data.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

This study assessed the clinical features of CTD-ILD patients with or without a 6-month PFD treatment. A linear mixed effects model was employed to evaluate the effectiveness of PFD in alleviating lung function changes. Differences in response to PFD were analyzed based on CTD subtype, imaging classification, and pattern of pulmonary function at baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 289 patients with CTD-ILD were included, with 155 (53.6%) receiving PFD treatment and the remaining constituting the control group. Patients with the usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern were more likely to receive PFD treatment, and a relatively lower proportion of cases in the PFD group received immunosuppressive therapies compared to the control group (p < 0.05). At the 6-month follow-up, patients in the PFD group demonstrated a more significant improvement in forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (ΔFVC%: 2.9% vs 0.45%, p = 0.009; ΔDLCO%: 1.9% vs -1.1%, p = 0.004). In the linear mixed model analysis, there was a statistically significant group-time interaction between FVC% and DLCO% changes over time (FVC%: β = 4.52, p < 0.001; DLCO%: β = 4.13, p = 0.003). Furthermore, subgroup analysis indicated that pirfenidone may have superior therapeutic effects in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated ILD, non-UIP pattern, and restrictive pattern of lung function at baseline.

CONCLUSION

This study provided real-world data demonstrating the effectiveness of PFD in terms of lung function improvement in patients with CTD-ILD.

The usual Interstitial pneumonia pattern in autoimmune rheumatic diseases

Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) is characterized by progression of lung parenchyma that may be observed in various autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), including rheumatoid arthritis and connective tissue diseases. From a diagnostic point of view, a UIP pattern related to ARDs may display imaging and pathological features able to distinguish it from that related to IPF, such as the "straight-edge" sign at HRCT and lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates at histologic specimens. Multidisciplinary approach (MDD), involving at least pulmonologist, rheumatologist and radiologist, is fundamental in the differential diagnosis process, but MDD is also required in the evaluation of severity, progression and response to treatment, that is based on the combination of changes in symptoms, pulmonary function trends, and, in selected patients, serial CT evaluation. Differently from IPF, in patients with ARDs both functional evaluation and patient-reported outcomes may be affected by systemic involvement and comorbidities, including musculoskeletal manifestations of disease. Finally, in regards to pharmacological treatment, immunosuppressants have been considered the cornerstone of therapy, despite the lack of solid evidence in most cases; recently, antifibrotic drugs were also proposed for the treatment of progressive fibrosing ILDs other than IPF. In ARD-ILD, the therapeutic choice should balance the need for the control of systemic and lung involvements with the risk of adverse events from multi-morbidities and -therapies. Purpose of this review is to summarize the definition, the radiological and morphological features of the UIP pattern in ARDs, together with risk factors, diagnostic criteria, prognostic evaluation, monitoring and management approaches of the UIP-ARDs.

Back to the future: targeting the extracellular matrix to treat systemic sclerosis

Fibrosis is the excessive deposition of a stable extracellular matrix (ECM); fibrotic tissue is composed principally of highly crosslinked type I collagen and highly contractile myofibroblasts. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multisystem autoimmune connective tissue disease characterized by skin and organ fibrosis. The fibrotic process has been recognized in SSc for >40 years, but drugs with demonstrable efficacy against SSc fibrosis in ameliorating the lung involvement have only recently been identified. Unfortunately, these treatments are ineffective at improving the skin score in patients with SSc. Previous clinical trials in SSc have largely focused on the cross-purposing of anti-inflammatory drugs and the use of immunosuppressive drugs from the transplantation field, which address inflammatory and/or autoimmune processes. Limited examination has taken place of specific anti-fibrotic agents developed through their ability to directly target the ECM in SSc by, for example, alleviating the persistent matrix stiffness and mechanotransduction that might be required for both the initiation and maintenance of fibrosis, including in SSc. However, because of the importance of the ECM in the SSc phenotype, attempts have now been made to identify drugs that specifically target the ECM, including some drugs that are currently under consideration for the treatment of cancer.

Weak to no correlation between quantitative high-resolution computed tomography metrics and lung function change in fibrotic diseases

Background

Identifying systemic sclerosis (SSc) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients at risk of more rapid forced vital capacity (FVC) decline could improve trial design. The purpose of the present study was to explore the prognostic value of quantitative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) metrics derived by Imbio lung texture analysis (LTA) tool in predicting FVC slope.

Methods

This retrospective study used data from patients who were not treated with investigational drugs with and without background antifibrotic therapies in tocilizumab phase 3 SSc, lebrikizumab phase 2 IPF, and zinpentraxin alfa phase 2 IPF studies conducted from 2015 to 2021. Controlled HRCT axial volumetric multidetector computed tomography scans were evaluated using the Imbio LTA tool. Associations between HRCT metrics and FVC slope were assessed through the Spearman correlation coefficient and adjusted R2 in a linear regression model adjusted by demographics and baseline clinical characteristics.

Results

A total of 271 SSc and IPF patients were analysed. Correlation coefficients of highest magnitude were observed in the SSc study between the extent of ground glass, normal volume, quantification of interstitial lung disease, reticular pattern, and FVC slope (-0.25, 0.28, -0.28, and -0.33, respectively), while the correlation coefficients observed in IPF studies were in general <0.2. The incremental prognostic value of the baseline HRCT metrics was marginal after adjusting baseline characteristics and was inconsistent across study arms.

Conclusion

Data from the SSc and IPF studies suggested weak to no and inconsistent correlation between quantitative HRCT metrics derived by the Imbio LTA tool and FVC slope in the studied SSc and IPF population.

Validity and Reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in a Real-World Interstitial Lung Disease Cohort

Rationale: Fatigue is a common and debilitating symptom for people living with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Studies on fatigue in ILD are limited, and little headway has been made toward developing interventions targeting the alleviation of fatigue. A barrier to progress is a lack of knowledge around the performance characteristics of a patient-reported outcome measure to assess fatigue in patients with ILD. Objectives: To assess the validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) for measuring fatigue in a national cohort of patients with ILD. Methods: FSS scores and several anchors were measured in 1,881 patients from the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Anchors included the Short Form 6D Health Utility Index (SF-6D) score and a single vitality question from the SF-6D; the University of California, San Diego, Shortness of Breath Questionnaire; FVC; DlCO; and 6-minute-walk distance. Internal consistency reliability, concurrent validity, and known-groups validity were assessed. Structural validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Measurements and Main Results: The FSS demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.96). There were moderate to strong correlations between FSS score and patient-reported anchors (vitality question from the SF-6D [r = 0.55] and University of California, San Diego, Shortness of Breath Questionnaire total score [r = 0.70]) and weak correlations between FSS score and physiological measures (FVC [r = -0.24], percentage predicted DlCO [r = -0.23], and 6-minute-walk distance [r = -0.29]). Higher mean FSS scores, indicating greater fatigue, were observed among patients using supplemental oxygen, those prescribed steroids, and those with lower percentage predicted FVC and percentage predicted DlCO. The confirmatory factor analysis results suggest that the nine questions of the FSS reflect one dimension of fatigue. Conclusions: Fatigue is an important patient-centered outcome in ILD that is poorly correlated with physiological measures of disease severity, including lung function and walk distance. These findings further support the need for a reliable and valid measure of patient-reported fatigue in ILD. The FSS possesses acceptable performance characteristics for assessing fatigue and distinguishing different degrees of fatigue among patients with ILD.

Learnings from clinical trials in patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease

Many clinical trial results are available to inform best practices in the treatment of patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD).Herein, we summarize the results of clinical trials, including patient-reported outcome instruments, for the treatment of patients with ILD associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc/scleroderma), rheumatoid arthritis, and idiopathic inflammatory myositis, the diseases with the most available data. For SSc-ILD, the US Food and Drug Administration approved nintedanib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in 2020 and subcutaneous tocilizumab (an IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody) in 2021. Rituximab was recently shown to have similar efficacy but better tolerability than intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) for CTD-ILD therapy. Scleroderma Lung Study II, conducted in patients with SSc-ILD, showed that oral CYC and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were comparable in their effects on lung function, but MMF was better tolerated. The increasing treatment armamentarium for patients with CTD-ILD offers physicians new opportunities to improve patient outcomes.

Drug development and novel therapeutics to ensure a personalized approach in the treatment of systemic sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a systemic disease encompassing autoimmunity, vasculopathy, and fibrosis. SSc is still burdened by high mortality and morbidity rates. Recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis of SSc have identified novel potential therapeutic targets. Several clinical trials have been subsequently designed to evaluate the efficacy of a number of new drugs. The aim of this review is to provide clinicians with useful information about these novel molecules.

AREA COVERED

In this narrative review, we summarize the available evidence regarding the most promising targeted therapies currently under investigation for the treatment of SSc. These medications include kinase inhibitors, B-cell depleting agents, and interleukin inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

Over the next five years, several new, targeted drugs will be introduced in clinical practice for the treatment of SSc. Such pharmacological agents will expand the existing pharmacopoeia and enable a more personalized and effective approach to patients with SSc. Thus, it will not only possible to target a specific disease domain, but also different stages of the disease.

Systemic therapy in juvenile localized scleroderma

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile localized scleroderma (JLS) is a rare sclerosing disorder of childhood which can result in permanent morbidity and functional disability, if not effectively treated. Treatment should be started in the inflammatory phase before the development of any complication and/or damage.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we will discuss how to assess disease activity and damage in JLS, and propose an escalation plan for systemic treatment, according to a treat-to-target concept. We will discuss the definition of inactive disease and how and when to discontinue medications.

EXPERT OPINION

Before starting treatment, it is extremely important to assess baseline disease activity for treatment response to be adequately checked. Moreover, the activity of the extra cutaneous involvement is an important part of the assessment. Patients should be treated in the 'therapeutic window,' before significant fibrosis results. Most patients should receive systemic treatments; in these patients, Methotrexate should be used as the first-line disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). However, methotrexate intolerance or non-response is an issue, and these patients should be proposed a treatment escalation according to results of latest studies. Future research can develop better prognostic markers to help to guide our decision.

Efficacy and safety of antifibrotic agents in the treatment of CTD-ILD and RA-ILD: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The clinical spectrum of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) and rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) ranges from asymptomatic findings on radiographic imaging to a rapidly progressive illness leading to respiratory failure and death. The treatment is always challenging due to the paucity of proven effective treatments. Nintedanib and pirfenidone are recently approved antifibrotics in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of antifibrotic agents in the treatment of CTD-ILD and RA-ILD.

METHODS

Relevant databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared pirfenidone or nintedanib with placebo in patients with CTD-ILD and RA-ILD. The primary outcome was the change in forced vital capacity (FVC). The odds ratio or risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated for categorical data, and the mean difference with 95% CI was estimated for continuous data. The I² statistic was used to assess heterogeneity, and meta-analysis was performed when possible.

RESULTS

Ten studies with a total of 880 participants met the inclusion criteria. Of these, four studies were included in the meta-analysis. According to the pooled result, the annual decline of FVC was significantly decreased in the antifibrotic agent arm compared to that in the placebo arm (MD 70.58 mL/yr, 95% CI 40.55 to 100.61).

CONCLUSION

This review suggests a potential benefit and safety of antifibrotic treatment in slowing the decline of FVC in patients with CTD-ILD and RA-ILD. Further large-sample, random-controlled, high-quality trials are needed to provide more evidence in the decision-making regarding the use of antifibrotics in this group of patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO; No.: CRD42022369112; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Therapeutic Approaches to Systemic Sclerosis: Recent Approvals and Future Candidate Therapies

Systemic sclerosis is the rheumatic disease with the highest individual mortality. The severity of the disease is determined by the extent of fibrotic changes to cutaneous and internal organ tissues, the most life-threatening visceral manifestations being interstitial lung disease, SSc-associated-pulmonary arterial hypertension and myocardial involvement. The heterogeneity of the disease has initially hindered the design of successful clinical trials, but considerations on classification criteria have improved patient selection in trials, allowing the identification of more homogeneous groups of patients based on progressive visceral manifestations or the extent of skin involvement with a focus of patients with early disease. Two major subsets of systemic sclerosis are classically described: limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis characterized by distal skin fibrosis and the diffuse subset with distal and proximal skin thickening. Beyond this dichotomic subgrouping of systemic sclerosis, new phenotypic considerations based on antibody subtypes have provided a better understanding of the heterogeneity of the disease, anti-Scl70 antibodies being associated with progressive interstitial lung disease regardless of cutaneous involvement. Two targeted therapies, tocilizumab (a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-6 receptors (IL-6R)) and nintedanib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor), have recently been approved by the American Food & Drug Administration to limit the decline of lung function in patients with SSc-associated interstitial lung disease, demonstrating that such better understanding of the disease pathogenesis with the identification of key targets can lead to therapeutic advances in the management of some visceral manifestations of the disease. This review will provide a brief overview of the pathogenesis of SSc and will present a selection of therapies recently approved or evaluated in this context. Therapies evaluated and approved in SSc-ILD will be emphasized and a review of recent phase II trials in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis will be proposed. We will also discuss selected therapeutic pathways currently under investigation in systemic sclerosis that still lack clinical data in this context but that may show promising results in the future based on preclinical data.

Pulmonary vascular fibrosis in pulmonary hypertension - The role of the extracellular matrix as a therapeutic target

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a condition characterized by changes in the extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and vascular remodeling of distal pulmonary arteries. These changes result in increased vessel wall thickness and lumen occlusion, leading to a loss of elasticity and vessel stiffening. Clinically, the mechanobiology of the pulmonary vasculature is becoming increasingly recognized for its prognostic and diagnostic value in PH. Specifically, the increased vascular fibrosis and stiffening resulting from ECM accumulation and crosslinking may be a promising target for the development of anti- or reverse-remodeling therapies. Indeed, there is a huge potential in therapeutic interference with mechano-associated pathways in vascular fibrosis and stiffening. The most direct approach is aiming to restore extracellular matrix homeostasis, by interference with its production, deposition, modification and turnover. Besides structural cells, immune cells contribute to the level of ECM maturation and degradation by direct cell-cell contact or the release of mediators and proteases, thereby opening a huge avenue to target vascular fibrosis via immunomodulation approaches. Indirectly, intracellular pathways associated with altered mechanobiology, ECM production, and fibrosis, offer a third option for therapeutic intervention. In PH, a vicious cycle of persistent activation of mechanosensing pathways such as YAP/TAZ initiates and perpetuates vascular stiffening, and is linked to key pathways disturbed in PH, such as TGF-beta/BMPR2/STAT. Together, this complexity of the regulation of vascular fibrosis and stiffening in PH allows the exploration of numerous potential therapeutic interventions. This review discusses connections and turning points of several of these interventions in detail.

Management of Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Focus on the Role of the Pharmacist

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common manifestation of systemic sclerosis (SSc), which becomes fibrosing and progressive in some patients. Regular monitoring of patients with SSc-ILD is important to assess progression and inform treatment decisions. Therapy for SSc-ILD may include immunomodulatory and antifibrotic therapies. Therapeutic decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis, ideally following multidisciplinary discussion. Most patients with SSc-ILD have several organ manifestations of SSc or comorbidities and are taking a complex medication regimen. Patients with SSc are particularly susceptible to gastrointestinal side-effects of medications due to the gastrointestinal manifestations of the disease. Pharmacists play an important role in the management of patients with SSc-ILD by assisting patients with access to medications, optimizing medication regimens, and advising on alternative dosage forms. Pharmacists can also contribute to patient education to help patients better understand their treatment and how to prevent and manage potential side effects.

State-of-the-art evidence in the treatment of systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune connective tissue disease with multi-organ involvement, fibrosis and vasculopathy. Treatment in SSc, including early diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) and the use of organ-specific therapies, has improved, as evident from randomized clinical trials. Treatments for early dcSSc include immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, rituximab and tocilizumab. Patients with rapidly progressive early dcSSc might be eligible for autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which can improve survival. Morbidity from interstitial lung disease and pulmonary arterial hypertension is improving with the use of proven therapies. Mycophenolate mofetil has surpassed cyclophosphamide as the initial treatment for SSc-interstitial lung disease. Nintedanib and possibly perfinidone can be considered in SSc pulmonary fibrosis. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is frequently treated with initial combination therapy (for example, with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors and endothelin receptor antagonists) and, if necessary, the addition of a prostacyclin analogue. Raynaud phenomenon and digital ulcers are treated with dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (especially nifedipine), then phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors or intravenous iloprost. Bosentan can reduce the development of new digital ulcers. Trial data for other manifestations are mostly lacking. Research is needed to develop targeted and highly effective treatments, best practices for organ-specific screening and early intervention, and sensitive outcome measurements.

Progressive pulmonary fibrosis: an expert group consensus statement

This expert group consensus statement emphasises the need for standardising the definition of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILDs), with an accurate initial diagnosis being of paramount importance in ensuring appropriate initial management. Equally, case-by-case decisions on monitoring and management are essential, given the varying presentations of F-ILDs and the varying rates of progression. The value of diagnostic tests in risk stratification at presentation and, separately, the importance of a logical monitoring strategy, tailored to manage the risk of progression, are also stressed. The term "progressive pulmonary fibrosis" (PPF) exactly describes the entity that clinicians often face in practice. The importance of using antifibrotic therapy early in PPF (once initial management has failed to prevent progression) is increasingly supported by evidence. Artificial intelligence software for high-resolution computed tomography analysis, although an exciting tool for the future, awaits validation. Guidance is provided on pulmonary rehabilitation, oxygen and the use of non-invasive ventilation focused specifically on the needs of ILD patients with progressive disease. PPF should be differentiated from acute deterioration due to drug-induced lung toxicity or other forms of acute exacerbations. Referral criteria for a lung transplant are discussed and applied to patient needs in severe diseases where transplantation is not realistic, either due to access limitations or transplantation contraindications. In conclusion, expert group consensus guidance is provided on the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of F-ILDs with specific focus on the recognition of PPF and the management of pulmonary fibrosis progressing despite initial management.

Understanding Interstitial Lung Diseases Associated with Connective Tissue Disease (CTD-ILD): Genetics, Cellular Pathophysiology, and Biologic Drivers

Connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) is a collection of systemic autoimmune disorders resulting in lung interstitial abnormalities or lung fibrosis. CTD-ILD pathogenesis is not well characterized because of disease heterogeneity and lack of pre-clinical models. Some common risk factors are inter-related with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, an extensively studied fibrotic lung disease, which includes genetic abnormalities and environmental risk factors. The primary pathogenic mechanism is that these risk factors promote alveolar type II cell dysfunction triggering many downstream profibrotic pathways, including inflammatory cascades, leading to lung fibroblast proliferation and activation, causing abnormal lung remodeling and repairs that result in interstitial pathology and lung fibrosis. In CTD-ILD, dysregulation of regulator pathways in inflammation is a primary culprit. However, confirmatory studies are required. Understanding these pathogenetic mechanisms is necessary for developing and tailoring more targeted therapy and provides newly discovered disease biomarkers for early diagnosis, clinical monitoring, and disease prognostication. This review highlights the central CTD-ILD pathogenesis and biological drivers that facilitate the discovery of disease biomarkers.

Recent advances in the treatment of systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease

Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) are a heterogenous group of systemic inflammatory disorders. The development of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) is a key complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this review is to explore the pathogenesis of CTD-ILD and summarize the recent evidence from clinical trials for novel treatment options, including the role of antifibrotics and immunomodulatory therapies with a focus on systemic sclerosis associated ILD. Further clinical trials are ongoing to explore combination therapies and more targeted therapeutic options. Clinicians remain faced with the difficult challenge of appropriately selecting patients who will benefit from the available therapies and timing the start of therapy at the most suitable part of the disease course.

Pulmonary Hypertension in Scleroderma- Evaluation and Management

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) is a clinical syndrome consisting of physiologic/hemodynamic criteria that are a consequence of several etiologies. Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), one of the most common causes of PAH, is an autoimmune disorder of the connective tissue leading to fibrosis that involves the skin, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, heart, kidney etc. SSc has an annual prevalence of one to five cases for every 1000 individuals and nearly 15 percent of all cases develop PAH. At its core, Pulmonary hypertension (PH) in SSc is an obliterative vasculopathy in small to medium-sized pulmonary arterioles. A host of other local and systemic mechanisms operate in concert to gradually alter the hemodynamics resulting in elevated pulmonary vascular resistance and thus right ventricular afterload. A diagnosis of PAH in SSc is virtually a death sentence, with studies reporting a mortality rate of 50 per cent in the 3 years of diagnosis. Therefore, developing and implementing a robust screening and diagnosis protocol is crucial in the fight against this pervasive disease. This review aims to summarize the current literature of PAH in SSc, with a special focus on the screening and diagnosis protocols, newer treatment options and prognostic indicators for the same.

Management of progressive pulmonary fibrosis associated with connective tissue disease

INTRODUCTION

: Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent and severe complication of connective tissue disease (CTD).

AREAS COVERED

: In this narrative review, we update the most relevant differential characteristics of fibrotic ILD associated with CTD (CTD-ILD) and propose a diagnostic and therapeutic approach based on a review of the articles published between 2002 and 2022 through PubMed.

EXPERT OPINION

: The subset of ILD, mainly the radiological/histological pattern and the degree of fibrotic component, usually determines the prognosis and therapeutic strategy for these patients. Some patients with CTD-ILD can develop progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) with severe deterioration of lung function, rapid progression to chronic respiratory failure, and high mortality. PPF has been described in many CTDs, mainly in systemic sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis, and requires a multidisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approach to improve patient outcomes.

The Efficacy and Safety of Pirfenidone Combined With Immunosuppressant Therapy in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A 24-Week Prospective Controlled Cohort Study

Objective

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common manifestation of connective tissue disease (CTD) that manifests as several subtypes with significant differences in prognosis. It is necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone (PFD) combined with immunosuppressant (IS) in the treatment of CTD-ILD.

Methods

A total of 111 patients with CTD-ILD were enrolled, including those with systemic sclerosis (SSc), inflammatory myopathy (IIM), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and other CTDs (such as systemic lupus erythematosus, primary Sjogren's syndrome, and undifferentiated CTD). After evaluation of the high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), pulmonary function (PF), and basic disease activity, patients either were or were not prescribed PFD and were followed up regularly for 24 weeks.

Results

After 24 weeks of treatment, predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) in the SSc-PFD group had improved by 6.60%, whereas this value was 0.55% in patients with SSc-no-PFD. The elevation in FVC% was also significant in IIM-PFD over the IIM-no-PFD controls (7.50 vs. 1.00%). The predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCo%) of RA-PFD was enhanced by 7.40%, whereas that of RA-no-PFD decreased by 5.50%. When performing a subtype analysis of HRCT images, the change in FVC% among patients with SSc with a tendency toward usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) was higher in those given PFD (SSc-PFD-UIP) than the no-PFD group (8.05 vs. −3.20%). However, in IIM patients with a non-UIP tendency, PFD displayed better therapeutic effects than the control (10.50 vs. 1.00%). DLCo% improved significantly in patients with the PFD-treated RA-non-UIP subtype compared with the patients with no-PFD (10.40 vs. −4.45%). Dichotomizing the patients around a baseline FVC% or DLCo% value of 70%, the PFD arm had a more improved FVC% than the no-PFD arm within the high-baseline-FVC% subgroups of patients with SSc and IIM (6.60 vs. 0.10%, 6.30 vs. 1.10%). In patients with RA-PFD, DLCo% showed a significant increase in the subgroup with low baseline DLCo% compared to that in patients with RA-no-PFD (7.40 vs. −6.60%).

Conclusion

The response of PF to PFD varied between CTD-ILD subsets. Patients with SSc and IIM showed obvious improvements in FVC%, especially patients with SSc-UIP and IIM-non-UIP. In RA, the subsets of patients with non-UIP and a lower baseline DLCo% most benefited from PFD.

Management of Connective Tissue Disease-related Interstitial Lung Disease

Purpose of Review

This review aims to collate current evidence on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of various connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated interstitial lung diseases (CTD-ILD) and present a contemporary framework for the management of such patients. It also seeks to summarize treatment outcomes including efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants, anti-fibrotics, and stem cell transplantation in CTD-ILD.

Recent Findings

Screening for ILD has been augmented by the use of artificial intelligence, ultra-low dose computerized tomography (CT) of the chest, and the use of chest ultrasound. Serum biomarkers have not found their way into clinical practice as yet. Identifying patients who need treatment and choosing the appropriate therapy is important to minimize the risk of therapy-related toxicity. The first-line drugs for systemic sclerosis (SSc) ILD include mycophenolate and cyclophosphamide. Nintedanib, an anti-fibrotic tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for use in SSc-ILD. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved tocilizumab subcutaneous injection for slowing the rate of decline in pulmonary function in adult patients with SSc-ILD. Autologous stem cell transplantation may have a role in select cases of SSc-ILD.

Summary

CTD-ILD is a challenging area with diverse entities and variable outcomes. High-resolution CT is the investigative modality of choice. Treatment decisions need to be individualized and are based on patient symptoms, lung function, radiologic abnormalities, and the risk of disease progression. Precision medicine may play an important role in determining the optimal therapy for an individual patient in the future.

Pirfenidone for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Beyond

Pirfenidone (PFD) slows the progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) by inhibiting the exaggerated fibrotic response and possibly through additional mechanisms, such as anti-inflammatory effects. PFD has also been evaluated in other fibrosing lung diseases. Myocardial fibrosis is a common feature of several heart diseases and the progressive deposition of extracellular matrix due to a persistent injury to cardiomyocytes may trigger a vicious cycle that leads to persistent structural and functional alterations of the myocardium. No primarily antifibrotic medications are used to treat patients with heart failure. There is some evidence that PFD has antifibrotic actions in various animal models of cardiac disease and a phase II trial on patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction has yielded positive results. This review summarises the evidence about the possible mechanisms of IPF and modulation by PFD, the main results about IPF or non-IPF interstitial pneumonias and also data about PFD as a potential protective cardiac drug.

Clinical Overview of Progressive Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) on the whole have variable prognoses, but there are those which manifest with fibrosis and are characterized by disease progression. Chief among these is idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, but other ILDs, including autoimmune ILD and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, may have a progressive fibrotic phenotype also. A usual interstitial pneumonia pattern of lung involvement is a prominent risk factor for such a course, suggesting shared fibrotic pathways that may be targeted by antifibrotic therapies. This brief review describes ILDs that are most commonly fibrotic, shared risk factors for development of PF-ILD, and evidence for antifibrotic use in their management.

Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis With Pirfenidone and Nintedanib: A Friend or Foe

Acute exacerbation (AE) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is unfortunate a deadly event with a very high mortality rate. Its occurrence is highly unpredictable, though few baseline risk factors have been identified. The revised definition of AE is more precise with clarity on defined parameters. However, no clear guidelines exist on treatment, with most therapies showing inconsistent benefits. Both the approved anti-fibrotic (pirfenidone and nintedanib) have shown equal efficacy in reducing the decline in lung functions, with few studies suggesting a drop in AE. We report a case of a patient with IPF with mildly impaired lung functions who was initiated on pirfenidone with dose titrated on a weekly basis but developed AE-IPF on day 10 of starting pirfenidone and after four days of doubling the dose from 600 mg/day to 1,200 mg/day. This raised the suspicion of whether pirfenidone played any role in this unfortunate event. With no response to conventional therapy of steroids and non-invasive ventilation for AE-IPF, initialization of nintedanib led to recovery with discharge of the patient in two weeks of hospitalization. This case highlights inadequacy in knowledge about the effects of these anti-fibrotics in IPF and recommends close monitoring in the future.

Emerging Evidence and Treatment Perspectives from Randomized Clinical Trials in Systemic Sclerosis: Focus on Interstitial Lung Disease

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex rare autoimmune disease with heterogeneous clinical manifestations. Currently, interstitial lung disease (ILD) and cardiac involvement (including pulmonary arterial hypertension) are recognized as the leading causes of SSc-associated mortality. New molecular targets have been discovered and phase II and phase III clinical trials published in the last 5 years on SSc-ILD will be discussed in this review. Details on the study design; the drug tested and its dose; the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study; the concomitant immunosuppression; the outcomes and the duration of the study were reviewed. The two most common drugs used for the treatment of SSc-ILD are cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil, both supported by randomized controlled trials. Additional drugs, such as nintedanib and tocilizumab, have been approved to slow pulmonary function decline in SSc-ILD. In this review, we discuss the therapeutic alternatives for SSc management, offering the option to customize the design of future studies to stratify SSc patients and provide a patient-specific treatment according to the new emerging pathogenic features of SSc-ILD.

[Systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease: Diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in the light of recent clinical trials]

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease associated to fibrotic manifestations. Interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), one of the main fibrotic features of SSc, is the first cause of SSc-related death. The management of SSc-ILD has recently benefited from the results of key randomised controlled trials. French authorities have approved Nintedanib for the treatment of SSc-ILD, and tocilizumab has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United-States (US). These recent approvals challenge the management of this fibrotic manifestation of SSc. This narrative literature review, at the crossroad of internal medicine and pulmonology, discusses what could be an up-to date approach, in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for SSc-ILD, in the light of the results from recent clinical trials.

Pirfenidone in Unclassifiable Interstitial Lung Disease: A Subgroup Analysis by Concomitant Mycophenolate Mofetil and/or Previous Corticosteroid Use

Introduction

There are currently no approved treatments solely for unclassifiable interstitial lung disease (uILD); however, a recent trial showed this population can benefit from pirfenidone. We report a subgroup analysis of this trial to assess the effects of immunomodulators (concomitant mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] and/or previous corticosteroids) with pirfenidone in patients with uILD.

Methods

This was a multicenter, international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial of patients with progressive fibrosing uILD (NCT03099187). Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive pirfenidone 2403 mg/day or placebo. This analysis assessed forced vital capacity (FVC) change from baseline measured using site spirometry (key secondary endpoint) and safety over 24 weeks by concomitant MMF use at randomization (pre-specified analysis) and/or previous corticosteroid use (post hoc analysis).

Results

Overall, 253 patients were randomized, including 45 (17.8%) patients (pirfenidone, n = 23; placebo, n = 22) receiving concomitant MMF with/without previous corticosteroids (MMF subgroup); 79 (31.2%) patients (pirfenidone, n = 44; placebo, n = 35) receiving previous corticosteroids without MMF (corticosteroids/no-MMF subgroup); and 129 (51.0%) patients (pirfenidone, n = 60; placebo, n = 69) not receiving concomitant MMF or previous corticosteroids (no-corticosteroids/no-MMF subgroup). At 24 weeks, difference in mean (95% confidence interval) FVC change from baseline between pirfenidone and placebo was − 55.4 mL (− 206.7, 96.0; P = 0.4645) in the MMF subgroup; 128.4 mL (− 6.4, 263.3; P = 0.0617) in the corticosteroids/no-MMF subgroup; and 115.5 mL (35.1, 195.9; P = 0.0052) in the no-corticosteroids/no-MMF subgroup. All subgroups generally exhibited a similar pattern of treatment-emergent adverse events.

Conclusion

Although limited by design and small sample sizes, this analysis suggests pirfenidone may be less effective in patients with uILD receiving concomitant MMF, whereas a beneficial treatment effect was observed in patients not receiving concomitant MMF regardless of previous corticosteroid use. Pirfenidone was well tolerated regardless of MMF and/or corticosteroid use.

Trial Registration Number

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03099187.

Therapeutic Options for Systemic Sclerosis: Current and Future Perspectives in Tackling Immune-Mediated Fibrosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a severe auto-immune, rheumatic disease, characterized by excessive fibrosis of the skin and visceral organs. SSc is accompanied by high morbidity and mortality rates, and unfortunately, few disease-modifying therapies are currently available. Inflammation, vasculopathy, and fibrosis are the key hallmarks of SSc pathology. In this narrative review, we examine the relationship between inflammation and fibrosis and provide an overview of the efficacy of current and novel treatment options in diminishing SSc-related fibrosis based on selected clinical trials. To do this, we first discuss inflammatory pathways of both the innate and acquired immune systems that are associated with SSc pathophysiology. Secondly, we review evidence supporting the use of first-line therapies in SSc patients. In addition, T cell-, B cell-, and cytokine-specific treatments that have been utilized in SSc are explored. Finally, the potential effectiveness of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other novel therapeutic approaches in reducing fibrosis is highlighted.

The role of antifibrotic therapies in the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune condition with complex pathogenesis characterized by a heterogeneous presentation and different disease courses. Fibrosis of multiple organs including the lungs favored by inflammation and vasculopathy is the hallmark of SSc. SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is common and can be associated with poor outcomes, this complication being the leading cause of death in recent series. Because of its huge heterogeneity, SSc-ILD management can be very challenging. Immunosuppressive therapy has long been used to prevent SSc-ILD progression with modest effects in clinical trials. However, thanks to a better understating of SSc pathogenesis, innovative therapies including antifibrotics are increasingly being developed. The achievement of the Safety and Efficacy of Nintedanib in Systemic SClerosIS (SENSCIS) trial has led to the approval by drug agencies of the first antifibrotic drug for SSc-ILD. In parallel, other antifibrotics are being investigated as possible beneficial therapies in SSc-ILD. An important unmet need remains to clarify the positioning of the various strategies, such as the added value of combination of immunosuppressants and antifibrotic therapies in patients at high risk of progression. Indeed, irreversible lung injury or self-perpetuated progression highlights the concept of a window of opportunity in SSc-ILD patients. Herewith, we provide an overview of the most significant clinical trials with antifibrotic drugs developed in recent years for the management of SSc-ILD and a viewpoint about their positioning in treatment algorithms.

Choosing pharmacotherapy for ILD in patients with connective tissue disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a well-recognised complication of several connective tissue diseases (CTD). This article outlines the various treatment options for the most common CTD-ILDs and discuss the ongoing research in this field. https://bit.ly/39NHwx6.

Systemic Sclerosis: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a systemic, immune-mediated chronic disorder characterized by small vessel alterations and progressive fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. The combination of a predisposing genetic background and triggering factors that causes a persistent activation of immune system at microvascular and tissue level is thought to be the pathogenetic driver of SSc. Endothelial alterations with subsequent myofibroblast activation, excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, and unrestrained tissue fibrosis are the pathogenetic steps responsible for the clinical manifestations of this disease, which can be highly heterogeneous according to the different entity of each pathogenic step in individual subjects. Although substantial progress has been made in the management of SSc in recent years, disease-modifying therapies are still lacking. Several molecular pathways involved in SSc pathogenesis are currently under evaluation as possible therapeutic targets in clinical trials. These include drugs targeting fibrotic and metabolic pathways (e.g., TGF-β, autotaxin/LPA, melanocortin, and mTOR), as well as molecules and cells involved in the persistent activation of the immune system (e.g., IL4/IL13, IL23, JAK/STAT, B cells, and plasma cells). In this review, we provide an overview of the most promising therapeutic targets that could improve the future clinical management of SSc.

Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: How to Incorporate Two Food and Drug Administration-Approved Therapies in Clinical Practice

Systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma) has the highest individual mortality of all rheumatic diseases, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) is among the leading causes of SSc-related death. Two drugs are now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and indicated for slowing the rate of decline in pulmonary function in patients with SSc-associated ILD (SSc-ILD): nintedanib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) and tocilizumab (the first biologic agent targeting the interleukin-6 pathway in SSc). In addition, 2 generic drugs with cytotoxic and immunoregulatory activity, mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide, have shown comparable efficacy in a phase II trial but are not FDA-approved for SSc-ILD. In light of the heterogeneity of the disease, the optimal therapeutic strategy for the management of SSc-ILD is still to be determined. The objectives of this review are 2-fold: 1) review the body of research focused on the diagnosis and treatment of SSc-ILD; and 2) propose a practical approach for diagnosis, stratification, management, and therapeutic decision-making in this clinical context. This review presents a practical classification of SSc patients in terms of disease severity (subclinical versus clinical ILD) and associated risk of progression (low versus high risk). The pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic options for first- and second-line therapy, as well as potential combination approaches, are discussed in light of the recent approval of tocilizumab for SSc-ILD.

Advances with pharmacotherapy for the treatment of interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

In recent decades, the primary focus of pharmaceutical research in interstitial lung diseases (ILD) has been on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Recently, pharmaceutical development has also focused on other forms of ILDs, including connective tissue diseases associated ILD, fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and sarcoidosis.

AREAS COVERED

The authors summarize the advances in pharmacotherapy for the treatment of ILD. Specifically, the authors review the most recent studies and discuss the most recent research findings and future prospects.

EXPERT OPINION

Data collected over the past years have confirmed the efficacy of antifibrotic drugs on slowing disease progression in IPF. The usual strategy for CTD-ILD management is represented by the combined use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. There is an urgent need for new target therapies. The concept of progressive fibrosing ILD has emerged in the ILD community in recent years, which has led to grouping several diseases with a common disease behavior to find an effective treatment . At present, selecting the best therapy in ILDs should be reasonably performed on a case-by-case basis through a multidisciplinary team discussion in tertiary ILD centers, taking into consideration patients' symptoms, lung functional trends, and radiological changes.

Role of antifibrotics in the management of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy associated interstitial lung disease

The antifibrotic therapies nintedanib and pirfenidone were first approved by the United States for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in 2014. In 2020, nintedanib received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of all progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD). Given that a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) is progressive interstitial lung disease and respiratory failure, antifibrotic therapies may be useful as adjuvant to traditional immunosuppression. However, randomized controlled trials of antifibrotic therapies in IIM are lacking. The purpose of this review is to (1) summarize the mechanism of action of nintedanib and pirfenidone in ILD with possible role in IIM-ILD, (2) review the clinical data supporting their use in interstitial lung disease in general, and more specifically in connective tissue disease associated ILD, and (3) discuss the evidence and remaining challenges for using antifibrotic therapies in IIM-ILD.

Pirfenidone is a renal protective drug: Mechanisms, signalling pathways, and preclinical evidence

Renal fibrosis, a characteristic of all chronic kidney diseases, lacks effective therapeutic drugs currently. Pirfenidone (PFD), a small molecule drug with good oral bioavailability, is widely used in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and exerts anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-apoptotic effects. These effects have been attributed to the suppression of cell growth factors (in particular, but not exclusively, transforming growth factor-β) and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, as well as the possible down-regulation of pro-inflammatory mediators (such as tumour necrosis factor-α), the protection of mitochondrial function, and the regulation of inflammatory cells. Considering the activation of similar anti-fibrotic pathways in lung and kidney disease and the broad activity of PFD, this drug has improved the treatment of the renal fibrotic disease. In this review, we briefly summarize the pharmacokinetics and safety of PFD as well as the mechanisms of PFD focusing on kidney disease. We summarize the effects of PFD on renal function and pathological alterations based on animal experiments, as well as changes in growth factors based on both animal and renal cell experiments. Moreover, given the activation of similar profibrotic pathways in pulmonary diseases and other disorders, we reviewed in-depth the possible signalling pathways targeted by PFD to attenuate renal fibrosis and protect renal function. Finally, we provide an overview of the current clinical trials of PFD for the treatment of renal fibrosis.