Relapse Risk and Safety of Long-Term Tocilizumab Use Among Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis: A Single-Enterprise Cohort Study

Tocilizumab (TCZ) for Giant Cell Arteritis: Clinical Outcomes Following Relapses and TCZ Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events

OBJECTIVE

Tocilizumab (TCZ) is effective for giant cell arteritis (GCA). However, little is known regarding treatment modification and clinical outcomes after unfavorable events such as GCA relapses or TCZ discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included patients with GCA who initiated TCZ from 2008 to 2021 at 5 Japanese hospitals. GCA relapses and TCZ-related AEs were monitored for 2 years after TCZ initiation. In patients with GCA relapses, subsequent clinical courses, including relapse symptoms and treatment modification, were followed for 90 days after the relapses. Similarly, patients who discontinued TCZ because of AEs were additionally followed until 1 year after the TCZ discontinuation to evaluate AEs, relapses, and treatment changes.

RESULTS

Of 62 eligible patients, 10 patients (16%) relapsed after initiating TCZ therapy. Most relapses (8 of 10) occurred after extending TCZ intervals or discontinuing TCZ. Combinations of adjusting TCZ intervals, adjusting glucocorticoid (GC) dose, and/or adding or increasing methotrexate (MTX) therapy could manage the relapses without serious complications. In the entire cohort, AEs occurred in 28 patients (45%), and 8 patients (13%) discontinued TCZ because of AEs. After AE-related TCZ discontinuation, 6 patients attempted to taper GCs without other immunosuppressive therapy (IST), and 4 subsequently relapsed. In contrast, 2 patients who used other IST or biologic therapy could decrease GCs without relapses.

CONCLUSION

Although GCA relapses can occur after initiating TCZ therapy, most relapses can be safely managed by adjusting TCZ, GC, and/or MTX doses. Adding IST or biologic treatments may potentially be related to preventing relapses when patients discontinue TCZ because of AEs.

French protocol for the diagnosis and management of giant cell arteritis

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a large-vessel vasculitis that mainly affects women over fifty. GCA usually involves branches from the external carotid arteries, causing symptoms such as headaches, scalp tenderness, and jaw claudication. The most severe complication is ophthalmologic involvement, including acute anterior ischemic optic neuropathy and, less frequently, central retinal artery occlusion with a risk of permanent blindness. Approximately 40% of patients may have involvement of the aorta or its branches, which has a poor prognosis, although this is often asymptomatic at diagnosis. Diagnosis is largely based on imaging techniques such as FDG-PET combined with CT, CT angiography, or MRI angiography of the aorta and its branches. Polymyalgia rheumatica is associated with GCA in 30-50% of cases but may also occur independently. Treatment must be initiated urgently in the presence of ophthalmologic signs or when GCA is strongly suspected to prevent vision loss. The gold standard to confirm the diagnosis is temporal artery biopsy. However, Doppler ultrasound and vascular imaging are also reliable diagnostic techniques. Initially, high doses of corticosteroids like prednisone (40-80mg per day) are the mainstay of treatment. Tocilizumab can be discussed in combination with prednisone for corticosteroid sparing. Long-term management is essential, including monitoring for disease recurrence and corticosteroid-related side effects. General practitioners play a crucial role in early diagnosis, directing patients to specialized centres, and in managing ongoing treatment in collaboration with specialists. This collaboration is essential to address potential long-term complications such as cardiovascular events. They can occur five to ten years after the diagnosis of GCA even when the disease is no longer active, meaning that vigilant follow-up is required due to the patients' age and status.

Does tocilizumab eliminate inflammation in GCA? A cohort study on repeated temporal artery biopsies

BACKGROUND

Vascular inflammation persists in temporal artery biopsy (TAB) of giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients even after prolonged glucocorticoid (GC) therapy. We aimed to evaluate the histological impact of adding tocilizumab (TCZ) to GCs.

METHODS

We enrolled all consecutive GCA patients with an inflammed TAB at diagnosis who were treated with TCZ and GCs for ≥6 months and followed from December 2017 to December 2023. Within 2 weeks, all patients underwent a second TAB, positron emission 18-fluorodeoxyglucose tomography/CT (PET/CT) and vessel colour Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS). Results were compared with pretreatment findings.

RESULTS

13 patients repeated TAB after a median TCZ treatment of 2.4 years (Q1-Q3: 1.2-3.9 years). The first TAB showed transmural inflammation (TMI) in 11/13 patients (84.6%), inflammation limited to adventitia (ILA) in one patient (7.7%) and small vessel vasculitis (SVV) in another (7.7%). On repeated TABs, five patients (38.5%) still showed some degree of inflammation. Among the 11 patients with initial TMI, 2 had ILA, 1 had TMI, 1had SVV and 1 had vasa vasorum vasculitis at the second TAB. Nine patients had active vasculitis at baseline PET/CT, and three (33.3%) still showed activity at the last PET/CT, with a relevant reduction in mean PET vascular activity score (-6.5; 95% CI 1.54 to 11.45; p=0.017). The repeated quantitative CDUS revealed altered parameters suggestive of vasculitis in temporal arteries in about one-third of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study, using pathological and imaging assessments, revealed that after TCZ and GCs, over one-third of patients still presented with vascular inflammation.

Relapse after cessation of weekly tocilizumab for giant cell arteritis: a multicentre service evaluation in England

OBJECTIVES

The National Health Service in England funds 12 months of weekly s.c. tocilizumab (qwTCZ) for patients with relapsing or refractory GCA. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, some patients were allowed longer treatment. We sought to describe what happened to patients after cessation of qwTCZ.

METHODS

Multicentre service evaluation of relapse after stopping qwTCZ for GCA. The log-rank test was used to identify significant differences in time to relapse.

RESULTS

A total of 336 GCA patients were analysed from 40 centres, treated with qwTCZ for a median [interquartile range (IQR)] of 12 (12-17) months. At time of stopping qwTCZ, median (IQR) prednisolone dose was 2 (0-5) mg/day. By 6, 12 and 24 months after stopping qwTCZ, 21.4%, 35.4% and 48.6%, respectively, had relapsed, requiring an increase in prednisolone dose to a median (IQR) of 20 (10-40) mg/day. 33.6% relapsers had a major relapse as defined by EULAR. Time to relapse was shorter in those that had previously also relapsed during qwTCZ treatment (P = 0.0017), in those not in remission at qwTCZ cessation (P = 0.0036) and in those with large vessel involvement on imaging (P = 0.0296). Age ≥65 years, gender, GCA-related sight loss, qwTCZ treatment duration, TCZ taper, prednisolone dosing and conventional synthetic DMARD use were not associated with time to relapse.

CONCLUSION

Up to half our patients with GCA relapsed after stopping qwTCZ, often requiring a substantial increase in prednisolone dose. One-third of relapsers had a major relapse. Extended use of TCZ or repeat treatment for relapse should be considered for these patients.

Taper versus discontinuation of tocilizumab in patients with giant cell arteritis: Real-world experience from a tertiary center

INTRODUCTION

Following the approval of tocilizumab (TCZ) for giant cell arteritis (GCA), recent studies have shown a high relapse frequency after abrupt discontinuation of TCZ. However, a thorough exploration of TCZ tapering compared to abrupt discontinuation has never been undertaken. Likewise, adverse events have only been scarcely investigated in routine care. This study aimed to compare the incidence of relapses in GCA patients undergoing TCZ tapering compared to abrupt discontinuation.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study from 2012 to 2022. Data from GCA patients treated with TCZ was obtained from the Electronic Patients Record. Relapse-free survival is reported in Kaplan-Meier plots and tapering versus abrupt discontinuation were compared using a Wilcoxon-Brewlos-Gehan test.

RESULTS

We included 155 patients receiving TCZ treatment for GCA, of which 104 discontinued TCZ. Among the 104 patients discontinuing TCZ, 42 (40 %) experienced a relapse within the first year. A total of 57 patients underwent taper with 6/38 (16 %) and 2/19 (11 %) relapsing while receiving TCZ every second or third week, respectively. In comparison, 59 patients underwent abrupt discontinuation with 27 (46 %) relapsing during follow-up. The patients undergoing abrupt TCZ discontinuation demonstrated a significantly shorter time to relapse compared to all tapered patients (p = 0.02) as well as patients tapered from weekly TCZ treatment to every second week (p < 0.01). Furthermore, 15 % of patients discontinued TCZ due to adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study indicating that TCZ taper induced longer relapse-free survival than abrupt discontinuation, implying that taper may be favored over discontinuation in patients with GCA.

The DANIsh VASculitis cohort study: protocol for a national multicenter prospective study including incident and prevalent patients with giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica

The DANIsh VASculitis cohort study, DANIVAS, is an observational national multicenter study with the overall aim to prospectively collect protocolized clinical data and biobank material from patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) diagnosed and/or followed at Danish rheumatology departments. A long-term key objective is to investigate whether the use of new clinically implemented diagnostic imaging modalities facilitates disease stratification in the GCA-PMR disease spectrum. In particular, we aim to evaluate treatment requirements in GCA patients with and without large-vessel involvement, treatment needs in PMR patients with and without subclinical giant cell arteritis, and the prognostic role of imaging with respect to aneurysm development. Hence, in GCA and PMR, imaging stratification is hypothesized to be able to guide management strategies. With an established infrastructure within rheumatology for clinical studies in Denmark, the infrastructure of the Danish Rheumatologic Biobank, and the possibility to cross-link data with valid nationwide registries, the DANIVAS project holds an exceptional possibility to collect comprehensive real-world data on diagnosis, disease severity, disease duration, treatment effect, complications, and adverse events. In this paper, we present the research protocol for the DANIVAS study. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT05935709.

Relapses in giant cell arteritis: Updated review for clinical practice

Giant cell arteritis (GCA), the most common primary vasculitis in adults, is a granulomatous systemic vasculitis usually affecting the aorta and its major branches, particularly the carotid and vertebral arteries. Although remission can be achieved in most patients with GCA using high-dose glucocorticoids (GC), relapses are frequent, occurring in >40% of GC-only treated patients, mostly during the first two years after diagnosis. Relapsing courses lead to high GC exposure, increasing the risk of treatment-related adverse effects. Although tocilizumab is an efficacious GC-sparing therapy that allows increased sustained remission and reduced cumulative GC doses, relapses are common after drug discontinuation. This narrative review examines the most relevant features of relapses in GCA, including its definition, classification, frequency, clinical, laboratory, and imaging characteristics, chronology, probable pathophysiology, and predictive factors. In addition, we discuss treatment options for relapsing patients and the effect of relapses on patient outcomes.

[Clinical characteristics and follow-up of 60 patients with recent diagnosis of giant cell arteritis, NEWTON study]

INTRODUCTION

The management of giant cell arteritis (GCA) has evolved with the arrival of tocilizumab (TCZ) and the use of PET/CT. Our objective is to describe the characteristics and followup of patients with recent diagnosis of GCA in current care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The NEWTON cohort is a monocentric retrospective cohort based on data collected from 60 GCA patients diagnosed between 2017 and 2022 according to the ACR/EULAR 2022 criteria.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 73 [68.75; 81] years old. At diagnosis, the main manifestations were unusual temporal headaches in 48 (80 %) and an inflammatory syndrome in 50 (83 %) patients. Temporal artery biopsy confirmed the diagnosis in 49/58 (84 %) patients. Doppler of the temporal arteries found a halo in 12/23 (52 %) patients. The PET/CT found hypermetabolism in 19/43 (44 %) patients. Prednisone was stopped in 17.5 [12.75; 24.25] months. During follow-up, 22 (37 %) patients received TCZ. At least one complication of corticosteroid therapy was observed in 22 (37 %) patients. After a median follow-up of 24 [12; 42] months, 25 (42 %) patients relapsed. At the end of the follow-up, 29 (48.3 %) patients were weaned from corticosteroid therapy and 15 (25 %) were on TCZ.

CONCLUSION

Despite the increasing use of TCZ in the therapeutic arsenal and of the PET/CT in the imaging tools of GCA patients, relapses and complications of corticosteroid therapy remain frequent, observed in more than a third of patients.

Large vessel giant cell arteritis

Giant cell arteritis is the principal form of systemic vasculitis affecting people over 50. Large-vessel involvement, termed large vessel giant cell arteritis, mainly affects the aorta and its branches, often occurring alongside cranial giant cell arteritis, but large vessel giant cell arteritis without cranial giant cell arteritis can also occur. Patients mostly present with constitutional symptoms, with localising large vessel giant cell arteritis symptoms present in a minority of patients only. Large vessel giant cell arteritis is usually overlooked until clinicians seek to exclude it with imaging by ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), or [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-CT. Although the role of imaging in treatment monitoring remains uncertain, imaging by MRA or CTA is crucial for identifying aortic aneurysm formation during patient follow up. In this Series paper, we define the large vessel subset of giant cell arteritis and summarise its clinical challenges. Furthermore, we identify areas for future research regarding the management of large vessel giant cell arteritis.

Overview of Vasculitides in Adults

Vasculitis is characterized by the inflammation of blood vessels. Vasculitides refers to the different forms of vasculitis, often classified according to the size of the blood vessel that is involved. Vasculitis may occur as a primary process or secondary to many systemic diseases. This topic provides an overview of the clinical features, diagnosis, and classification of the different forms of vasculitides.

The role of tocilizumab in the treatment of post-transfusion hyperhaemolysis

Hyperhaemolysis syndrome (HHS) is a serious complication of transfusion mostly reported in patients with sickle cell disease. HHS is characterised by the destruction of both donor and autologous red blood cells. Tocilizumab is a recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody that inhibits the binding of interleukin-6 and has been used in the treatment of severe/critical coronavirus disease 2019 infection but also some cases of HHS. We describe two further cases of HHS successfully treated with tocilizumab and propose a decision aid for when to consider this treatment.