Temporal trends in mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a Danish population-based matched cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Excess mortality has been demonstrated in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared with the general population. We aimed to investigate the 5-year and 10-year all-cause mortality in patients with SLE compared with the general population in recent decades.

METHODS

Nationwide population-based exposure matched cohort study. Incident cases of SLE diagnosed between 1996 and 2015 were identified using administrative health registries and followed until 2020, allowing for 5 and 10 years of follow-up. Patients with SLE were matched 1:5 on age and sex with individuals from the Danish general population. Time-to-event analyses were performed using the pseudo-observation approach.

RESULTS

In total, 1351 incident cases of SLE and 6755 matched controls were identified. The crude risk difference (RD) for 5 years mortality decreased over the study period from 10.3% (95% CI 6.5-14.1%) to 4.6% (95% CI 1.4-7.8%) for patients with SLE compared with controls. The relative risk (RR) for 5-year mortality decreased similarly in the same period. Adjustment for comorbidities revealed lower RD and RR for mortality, but the decreasing trend remained. Crude and adjusted RD and RR for 10-year mortality did not change over calendar period. The 10-year RR was highest in young patients <50 years of age.

CONCLUSION

Five-year mortality risk decreased over time for both patients with SLE and matched controls. However, excess 5-year mortality in the most recent calendar period and mortality late in the disease course remained. Continued focus on preventing disease progression and comorbidity is required.

"I couldn't carry on taking a drug like that": A qualitative study of patient perspectives on side effects from rheumatology drugs

OBJECTIVES

There is growing interest in collecting outcome information directly from patients in clinical trials. This study evaluates what patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) consider important to know about symptomatic side effects they may experience from a new prescription drug.

METHODS

Patients with inflammatory arthritis, who had one or more prescribed drugs for their disease for at least 12 months, participated in focus groups and individual interviews. Discussions were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We conducted seven focus groups with 34 participants across three continents. We found four overarching and two underpinning themes. The 'impact on life' was connected to participants 'daily life', 'family life', 'work life', and 'social life'. In 'psychological and physical aspects' participants described 'limitation to physical function', 'emotional dysregulation' and 'an overall mental state'. Extra tests, hospital visits and payment for medication were considered a 'time, energy and financial burden' of side effects. Participants explained important measurement issues to be 'severity', 'frequency', and 'duration'. Underpinning these issues, participants evaluated the 'benefit-harm-balance' which includes 'the cumulative burden' of having several side effects and the persistence of side effects over time.

CONCLUSIONS

In treatment for RMDs, there seems to be an urgent need for feasible measures of patient-reported bother (impact on life and cumulative burden) from side effects and the benefit-harm-balance. These findings contribute new evidence in support of a target domain-an outcome that represents the patient voice evaluating the symptomatic treatment-related side effects for people with RMDs enrolled in clinical trials.

Temporal trends in mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a Danish population-based matched cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the 5-year all-cause mortality in patients with RA compared with the general population.

METHODS

This was a nationwide population-based matched cohort study. RA patients diagnosed between 1996 and the end of 2015 were identified using administrative heath registries and followed until the end of 2020 allowing 5 years of follow-up. Patients with incident RA were matched 1:5 on year of birth and sex with non-RA individuals from the Danish general population. Time-to-event analyses were performed using the pseudo-observation approach.

RESULTS

Compared with matched controls in 1996-2000, the risk difference for RA patients ranged from 3.5% (95% CI 2.7%, 4.4%) in 1996-2000 to -1.6% (95% CI -2.3%, -1.0%) in 2011-15, and the relative risk from 1.3 (95% CI 1.2, 1.4) in 1996-2000 to 0.9 (95% CI 0.8, 0.9) in 2011-15. The age-adjusted 5-year cumulative incidence proportion of death for a 60-year-old RA patient decreased from 8.1% (95% CI 7.3%, 8.9%) when diagnosed in 1996-2000 to 2.9% (95% CI 2.3%, 3.5%) in 2011-15, and for matched controls from 4.6% (95% CI 4.2%, 4.9%) to 2.1% (95% CI 1.9%, 2.4%). Excess mortality persisted in women with RA throughout the study period, while the mortality risk for men with RA in 2011-15 was similar to their matched controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced improvement in mortality was found in RA patients compared with matched controls, but for sex-specific differences excess mortality was only persistent in women with RA.

Polyautoimmunity in Patients With Anticyclic Citrullinated Peptide Antibody-Positive and -Negative Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Nationwide Cohort Study From Denmark

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the prevalence and incidence of polyautoimmunity between anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP)-positive and anti-CCP-negative patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

In a nationwide register-based cohort study, patients with RA (disease duration ≤ 2 yrs) in the DANBIO rheumatology register with an available anti-CCP test in the Register of Laboratory Results for Research were identified. The polyautoimmunity outcome included 21 nonrheumatic autoimmune diseases identified by linkage between the Danish Patient Registry and Prescription Registry. The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) was calculated by modified Poisson regression to estimate the prevalence at diagnosis in anti-CCP-positive vs anti-CCP-negative patients. The hazard ratio (HR) of polyautoimmunity within 5 years of entry into DANBIO was estimated in cause-specific Cox regression models.

RESULTS

The study included 5839 anti-CCP-positive and 3799 anti-CCP-negative patients with RA. At first visit, the prevalence of prespecified polyautoimmune diseases in the Danish registers was 11.1% and 11.9% in anti-CCP-positive and anti-CCP-negative patients, respectively (PR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84-1.05). The most frequent autoimmune diseases were autoimmune thyroid disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and type 1 diabetes mellitus. During a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, only a few (n = 210) patients developed polyautoimmunity (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.46-0.79).

CONCLUSION

Polyautoimmunity as captured through the Danish National Patient Registry occurred in approximately 1 in 10 patients with RA at time of diagnosis regardless of anti-CCP status. In the years subsequent to the RA diagnosis, only a few and mainly anti-CCP-negative patients developed autoimmune disease.

Quantitative sensory testing, psychological profiles and clinical pain in patients with psoriatic arthritis and hand osteoarthritis experiencing pain of at least moderate intensity

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain is the hallmark symptom of joint diseases. This study examined the differences in quantitative sensory testing between patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), hand osteoarthritis (hand-OA) and a pain-free control group and differences between patients with and without concomitant fibromyalgia (cFM).

METHODS

All patients and pain-free controls were assessed using pressure pain thresholds (PPT), temporal summation of pain (TSP), conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and clinical pain intensities. Psychological distress was assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Disability was assessed with the Health Assessment Questionnaire and pain quality with the painDETECT questionnaire. cFM was identified using the revised 2016 American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria.

RESULTS

Patients with hand-OA (n = 75) or PsA (n = 58) had statistically significant lower PPTs and CPM, greater TSP, and higher scores of psychological distress (p < 0.05) than controls (n = 20). Patients with cFM (58%) had higher scores of depression (p = 0.001), anxiety (p = 0.004), catastrophizing (p = 0.012), disability (p < 0.001), higher painDETECT score (p = 0.001), TSP (p = 0.027), and reduced sleep quality (p = 0.021) when compared to patients without cFM.

CONCLUSION

Patients with hand-OA and PsA exhibited signs of pain sensitization and a higher degree of psychological distress and disability than pain-free individuals. Patients with cFM had greater TSP, painDETECT score, disability, catastrophizing, and reduced sleep quality, than patients without, indicating greater degree of pain sensitization, psychological burden, and disability.

STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE

This paper shows that a significant proportion of patients with hand osteoarthritis and psoriatic arthritis with moderate pain intensity have significantly increased signs of pain sensitization and markers of psychological distress. A large proportion of these patients fulfil the criteria for concomitant fibromyalgia and these patients show even greater propensity towards pain sensitization and psychological distress.

Polyautoimmunity in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A nationwide sex- and age-matched cohort study from Denmark

Background

Polyautoimmunity is defined as having 2 or more autoimmune diseases. Little is known about polyautoimmunity in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).

Objectives

To estimate prevalence and 5-year incidence of non-lupus erythematosus (LE) autoimmune diseases in patients with CLE.

Methods

Patients with CLE were identified In the Danish National Patient Registry and each patient was age- and sex-matched with 10 general population controls. Outcome information on non-LE autoimmune diseases was obtained by register-linkage between Danish National Patient Registry and the National Prescription Register. The risk ratio (RR) for prevalent non-LE autoimmune disease at time of CLE diagnosis was calculated in modified Poisson regression; and hazard ratios (HRs) for incident non-LE autoimmune disease were estimated in Cox regression analyses.

Results

Overall, 1674 patients with CLE had a higher prevalence of a non-LE autoimmune disease than the comparators (18.5 vs 7.9%; RR 2.4; 95% CI, 2.1 to 2.6). Correspondingly, the cumulative incidence of a non-LE autoimmune disease during 5 years of follow-up was increased for the patients with CLE: HR 3.5 (95% CI, 3.0 to 4.0).

Limitations

Risk of detection and misclassification bias, mainly pertaining to the CLE group.

Conclusion

Patients with CLE had higher prevalence and 5-year cumulative incidence of a non-LE autoimmune disease than the general population.

Absolute risk estimation of new-onset proteinuria in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a Danish nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Kidney involvement and medical compliance are frequent challenges in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Additional data reporting such as absolute risk estimates may strengthen risk stratification and compliance. This study provides absolute risk estimations of risk of new-onset proteinuria among SLE patients.

METHODS

Danish SLE centres provided clinical data on first time observations of proteinuria and other clinical parameters listed in the 1997 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for SLE. Time from first occurring non-renal manifestation to new-onset proteinuria or censoring defined time at risk. Multivariate Cox-regression models were used to identify risk factors for new-onset proteinuria and to calculate risk of proteinuria stratified by risk factor debut age, duration, and sex.

RESULTS

The patient population consisted of 586 patients with SLE, mainly Caucasian (94%) women (88%), mean age at inclusion of 34.6 years (standard deviation, SD=14.4 years), observed for a mean of 14.9 years (SD=11.2 years). The cumulative prevalence of proteinuria was 40%. Discoid rash, HR =0.42 (p=0.01) and lymphopenia HR=1.77 (p=0.005) were associated with new-onset proteinuria. Male patients with lymphopenia had the highest predictive risks of proteinuria with a 1-, 5- and 10-year risk of proteinuria ranging from 9-27%, 34-75% and 51-89%, depending on the age at presentation (debut at 20, 30, 40 or 50 years). The corresponding risk profiles for women with lymphopenia were 3-9%, 8-34% and 12-58%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Large differences in absolute risk estimates for new-onset proteinuria were identified. The differences may aid risk stratification and patient compliance among high-risk individuals.

Predicting successful biologics tapering in patients with inflammatory arthritis: Secondary analyses based on the BIOlogical Dose OPTimisation (BIODOPT) trial

AIMS

To evaluate predictors for successful biologic tapering among patients with inflammatory arthritis using baseline characteristics from the BIODOPT trial.

METHODS

Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis on stable biologic dose and in low disease activity ≥12 months were enrolled. Participants were randomized (2:1) to disease activity-guided biologic tapering or continuation of baseline biologic. Patients achieving successful tapering reduced their biologic dose by ≥50%, had no protocol deviations and were in low disease activity at 18 months. Modified Poisson regression with robust variance estimator was applied.

RESULTS

In total, 142 patients were randomized to tapering (n = 95) or control (n = 47). Successful tapering was achieved by 32 and 2%, respectively. Tapering group was the only statistically significant independent predictor for successful tapering, risk ratio (RR): 14.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9 to 101.3, P = .009). However, higher Short Form Health Survey 36 mental component summary (SF-36 MCS) was observed to be a predictor of potential importance, RR: 1.06 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.13, P = .097). When limiting the analyses to the tapering group only, none of the baseline variables were statistically significant independent predictors but SF-36 MCS was still considered to be of potential importance, RR: 1.05 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.12, P = .098).

CONCLUSION

Successful tapering is a reachable target for 1 in 3 patients with inflammatory arthritis who are interested in reducing their biological therapy. No statistically significant predictors (besides allocation to tapering) were identified. Future research on mental health and tapering is encouraged.

Disease activity-guided tapering of biologics in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a pragmatic, randomized, open-label, equivalence trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether disease activity-guided tapering of biologics compared to continuation as usual care enables a substantial dose reduction while disease activity remains equivalent.

METHOD

In this pragmatic, randomized, open-label, equivalence trial, adults with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or axial spondyloarthritis in low disease activity on stable-dose biologics for ≥ 12 months were randomized 2:1 into either the tapering group, i.e. disease activity-guided prolongation of the biologic dosing interval until flare or withdrawal, or the control group, i.e. maintaince of baseline biologics with a possible small interval increase at the patients request. The co-primary outcome in the intention-to-treat population was met if superiority in ≥ 50% biologic reduction at 18 months was demonstrated and disease activity was equivalent (equivalence margins ± 0.5).

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were randomized to tapering and 47 to control, of whom 37% (35/95) versus 2% (1/47) achieved ≥ 50% biologic reduction at 18 months. The risk difference was statistically significant [35%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 24%-45%], while disease activity remained equivalent [mean difference 0.05, 95% CI -0.12-0.29]. A statistically significant flare risk was observed [tapering 41% (39/95) vs control 21% (10/47), risk difference 20%, 95% CI 4%-35%]; but, only 1% (1/95) and 6% (3/47) had persistent flare and needed to switch to another biological drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Disease activity-guided tapering of biologics in patients with inflammatory arthritis enabled one-third to achieve ≥ 50% biologic reduction, while disease activity between groups remained equivalent. Flares were more frequent in the tapering group but were managed with rescue therapy.

Increased risk of cardiovascular disease preceding diagnosis of incident ANCA-associated vasculitis: a Danish nationwide study

OBJECTIVE

To examine if patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in the months prior to diagnosis of AAV.

METHODS

Using a nested case-control framework, patients with Granulomatosis with polyangiitis and Microscopic polyangiitis were identified through Danish Nationwide Registries from 1996-2021 and matched 1:3 with age- and sex-matched controls without AAV. Each control was assigned the same index date (date of AAV-diagnosis) as their corresponding case. Conditional logistic regression was used to compute adjusted Hazard Ratios (HRs) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), ischemic heart disease, coronary angiogram, heart failure, venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation, ischemic stroke, pericarditis, and ventricular arrhythmias/ICD-implantation/cardiac arrest (VA/ICD/CA) within 12 months, 6 months, 3 months, 2 months and 1 month before index date.

RESULTS

A total of 2371 patients with AAV (median age: 63yrs, 53.7% male) were matched with 7113 controls. The prevalence of any cardiovascular outcome and MACE within 12 months preceding index date were 10.3% and 2.4% for AAV, compared to 3.8% (HR 3.05[2.48-3.75]) and 1.3% (HR 1.98[1.39-2.82]) of controls. The risk of cardiovascular outcomes was similarly increased in temporal proximity to the diagnosis, with the highest HR at 1 month prior to index date: Any cardiovascular outcome (HR 10.73[7.05-16.32]) and MACE (HR 5.78[2.67-12.52]). In individual analysis, a significantly higher rate was observed for all outcomes (excluding VA/ICD/CA).

CONCLUSIONS

AAV disease is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in the months preceding diagnosis, which underlines the importance of early clinical vigilance toward cardiovascular disease.

Long-term cardiovascular outcomes and temporal trends in patients diagnosed with ANCA-associated vasculitis: a Danish nationwide registry study

OBJECTIVES

To examine long-term cardiovascular outcomes and temporal trends among patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) using Danish nationwide registries.

METHODS

Using a cohort design, we examined patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (ICD-10: DM31.3) and microscopic polyangiitis (ICD-10: DM3.17) in Denmark from 1996-2018. Hazard ratios (HRs) of cardiovascular outcomes were compared between patients with AAV and age and gender-matched controls. Counterfactual G-estimation of HRs was performed to estimate 5-year absolute risks. Temporal trends were obtained by grouping cohorts into evenly distributed tertiles according to inclusion year.

RESULTS

A total of 2306 patients with AAV (median age: 62.9yrs, 52.6% male) were matched with 6918 controls. Median follow-up was 9.5yrs. Patients with AAV had a higher rate of ischaemic heart disease [HR 1.86 (1.62-2.15)], myocardial infarction [HR 1.62 (1.26-2.09)], coronary angiogram [HR 1.64 (1.37-1.96)], percutaneous coronary intervention [HR 1.56 (1.17-2.07)] and ventricular arrhythmias/implantable-cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)-implantations [HR 2.04 (1.16-3.57)]. Similarly, an increased rate of heart failure [HR 2.12 (1.77-2.54)], deep vein thrombosis [HR 3.13 (2.43-4.05)], pulmonary embolism [HR 4.04 (3.07-5.32)], atrial fibrillation [HR 2.08 (1.82-2.39)], ischaemic stroke [HR 1.58 (1.31-1.90)] and in-hospital cardiac arrest [HR 2.27 (1.49-3.48)] was observed. The 5-year risk of all outcomes were significantly higher (excluding ventricular arrhythmia/ICD-implantations). For temporal trends among patients with AAV, a decreased 3-year risk of cardiovascular mortality was observed over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AAV are at increased risk of heart failure, atrial-/ventricular arrhythmias, venous thrombotic events, ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction. Furthermore, patients with AAV were more frequently examined with coronary procedures and underwent more coronary revascularizations. No temporal changes in ischaemic cardiovascular outcomes were observed, albeit the cardiovascular mortality has decreased over time.

Infliximab biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease: clinical outcomes in real-world patients from the DANBIO registry

Objective

Successful uptake of biosimilars in rheumatology is limited by lack of real-world evidence regarding effectiveness of biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching. We investigated infliximab biosimilars CT-P13-to-GP1111 switching among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA).

Methods

Observational cohort study from the DANBIO registry. Patients were classified as originator-naïve or originator-experienced. Retention rates of 1-year GP1111 treatment were explored (Kaplan-Meier). We identified baseline factors (at the time of switch) associated with withdrawal of GP1111 (multivariable Cox-regression analyses with HRs including originator treatment history). Changes in subjective and objective measures of disease activity 4 months before and after the switch were assessed in individual patients.

Results

Of 1605 patients (685 RA, 314 PsA and 606 AxSpA, median disease duration was 9 years, 37% in Clinical Disease Activity Index/Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score remission), 1171 were originator-naïve. Retention rates at 1-year were 83% (95% CI: 81% to 85%) and 92% (95% CI: 90% to 95%) for the originator-naïve and originator-experienced, respectively. GP1111 retention rates were higher in originator-experienced compared to originator-naïve with RA (HR=0.4 (95% CI: 0.2 to 0.7)) and PsA (HR=0.2 (95% CI: 0.1 to 0.8)), but not significantly for AxSpA: HR=0.6 (95% CI: 0.3 to 1.2). Lower disease activity was associated with higher retention. Changes in disease activity preswitch and postswitch were close to zero.

Conclusion

This real-world observational study of more than 1600 patients with inflammatory arthritis showed high 1-year retention following a nationwide infliximab biosimilar-to-biosimilar switch. Retention was higher in originator-experienced and in patients with low disease activity, suggesting outcomes to be affected by patient-related rather than drug-related factors.

Modulating Heart Rate Variability through Deep Breathing Exercises and Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation: A Study in Healthy Participants and in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis or Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are associated with an impaired autonomic nervous system and vagus nerve function. Electrical or physiological (deep breathing-DB) vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) could be a potential treatment approach, but no direct comparison has been made. In this study, the effect of transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS) and DB on vagal tone was compared in healthy participants and RA or SLE patients. The vagal tone was estimated using time-domain heart-rate variability (HRV) parameters. Forty-two healthy participants and 52 patients performed 30 min of DB and 30 min of taVNS on separate days. HRV was recorded before and immediately after each intervention. For the healthy participants, all HRV parameters increased after DB (SDNN + RMSSD: 21-46%), while one HRV parameter increased after taVNS (SDNN: 16%). For the patients, all HRV parameters increased after both DB (17-31%) and taVNS (18-25%), with no differences between the two types of VNS. DB was associated with the largest elevation of the HRV parameters in healthy participants, while both types of VNS led to elevated HRV parameters in the patients. The findings support a potential use of VNS as a new treatment approach, but the clinical effects need to be investigated in future studies.

Perioperative atrial fibrillation in major emergency abdominal surgery: does it affect postoperative outcome?

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in relation to surgery remains a clinical challenge. Major emergency abdominal surgery (e.g. ileus, perforation) is associated with postoperative complications and mortality. However, the prevalence and impact of perioperative AF in this setting is not well examined.

Purpose

We compared 30-days and 1-year outcomes (i.e. hospitalization of any causes, AF-related hospitalization, thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality) in patients who did and did not develop perioperative AF (POAF) in relation to their major emergency abdominal surgery.

Methods

We crosslinked data from Danish nationwide registries and identified all patients who underwent major emergency abdominal surgery (2000–2018) and discharged alive. Patients who developed POAF during hospitalization were matched in a 1:3 ratio on age, sex, year of surgery and category of surgery with those without POAF. Starting follow up at discharge, we examined the rates of outcomes at 30-days and 1-year post-discharge. The cumulative incidences and ratios of outcomes were assessed with the Aalen Johanson estimator together with Kaplan-Meier estimator and multivariable Cox regression analysis, respectively.

Results

We identified 891 patients with POAF and 64,914 patients without POAF. The matched cohort were composed of 889 patients with POAF and 2667 patients without POAF with a median age of 79 years [25th-75th percentile; 72–84 years] and 45.2% males. In general, patients with POAF had higher comorbid burden compared with patients without POAF. The cumulative incidences of a hospitalization of any cause after 30-days post-discharge were 31.2% and 22.3% in patients with and without POAF, respectively. The corresponding numbers for AF-related hospitalization were 20.8% and 1.2%, respectively. In adjusted analyses, POAF was associated with a significantly higher risk of hospitalization of any causes together with AF-related hospitalization (Figure 1 and 2).

The cumulative incidences of a thromboembolic event after 30-days post-discharge were 2.2% and 0.9% in patients with and without POAF, respectively. The corresponding numbers for all-cause mortality were 9.7% and 3.2%, respectively. In adjusted analyses, POAF was associated with a significantly higher risk of a thromboembolic event together with all-cause mortality within 30-days of follow up as well as 1-year of follow up. However, the results regarding thromboembolic events did not reach statistical significance after 1-year of follow up (Figure 1 and 2).

Conclusions

Perioperative atrial fibrillation in relation to major emergency abdominal surgery was associated with higher 30-days and 1-year rates of hospitalizations of any causes, atrial fibrillation related hospitalization, a thromboembolic event and all-cause mortality. These findings suggest that perioperative atrial fibrillation is a strong prognostic marker of increased morbidity following major emergency abdominal surgery.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Validation of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) experience significant fatigue, a debilitating symptom associated with reduced quality of life. There has not yet been agreed on a simple and reliable method for assessing fatigue in SLE.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity) of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) in patients with SLE. The secondary objective was to investigate the contribution of disease activity and organ damage to fatigue.

METHODS

Fatigue was assessed using the MFIS in 61 patients with SLE. Internal consistency of MFIS was assessed with Cronbach's alpha (α) and Principal Component Analysis. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was studied using Spearman's rank correlation (r_s). Associations between MFIS and disease activity and organ damage were estimated with r_s.

RESULTS

Internal consistency of the MFIS was excellent with Cronbach's α = 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-0.98) for the complete scale. Test-retest reliability was good with ICC = 0.89 (95% CI: 0.78-0.95, p < 0.001). Construct validity was confirmed by Spearman's correlation (VT-SF36: r_s = -0.73, p < 0.001. MH-SF36: r_s = 0.70, p < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between the MFIS and SLEDAI (r_s = 0.03, p = 0.83). There was a moderate correlation between MFIS and SLICC Damage Index (r_s = 0.43, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The present study found the MFIS to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing fatigue in SLE. Further investigations are needed to clarify if an association between measured fatigue and disease components exists.

Investigating the Dose-Response Relationship between Deep Breathing and Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Participants and Across-Days Reliability in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) are associated with autonomic dysfunction, potentially through reduced vagus nerve tone. Vagus nerve stimulation has been proposed as an anti-inflammatory treatment, and it can be performed through deep breathing (DB) exercises. In this study, the dose-response relationship between DB exercises and heart rate variability (HRV) was investigated in healthy participants and reliability across days in patients with RA and SLE. On three separate days, 41 healthy participants performed DB for: 5, 15, or 30 min. On two separate days, 52 RA or SLE patients performed DB with the dose associated with the highest HRV increase in healthy participants. The HRV was estimated from ECG-recordings recorded prior and post the DB exercises. Increases in dose led to larger HRV-responses. Thirty minutes led to the largest HRV-response. In the RA and SLE patients, this dose increased the HRV-parameters consistently across the two days, indicating reliability. DB increases HRV in healthy participants and RA or SLE patients, which indicates stimulation of the vagus nerve. Of the tested durations, 30 min of DB was the optimal period of stimulation. A potential anti-inflammatory effect of DB exercises should be investigated in future studies.

A synopsis of global frontiers in fertility preservation

Since 2007, the Oncofertility Consortium Annual Conference has brought together a diverse network of individuals from a wide range of backgrounds and professional levels to disseminate emerging basic and clinical research findings in fertility preservation. This network also developed enduring educational materials to accelerate the pace and quality of field-wide scientific communication. Between 2007 and 2019, the Oncofertility Consortium Annual Conference was held as an in-person event in Chicago, IL. The conference attracted approximately 250 attendees each year representing 20 countries around the world. In 2020, however, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted this paradigm and precluded an in-person meeting. Nevertheless, there remained an undeniable demand for the oncofertility community to convene. To maintain the momentum of the field, the Oncofertility Consortium hosted a day-long virtual meeting on March 5, 2021, with the theme of "Oncofertility Around the Globe" to highlight the diversity of clinical care and translational research that is ongoing around the world in this discipline. This virtual meeting was hosted using the vFairs ® conference platform and allowed over 700 people to participate, many of whom were first-time conference attendees. The agenda featured concurrent sessions from presenters in six continents which provided attendees a complete overview of the field and furthered our mission to create a global community of oncofertility practice. This paper provides a synopsis of talks delivered at this event and highlights the new advances and frontiers in the fields of oncofertility and fertility preservation around the globe from clinical practice and patient-centered efforts to translational research.

Multiomics analysis of rheumatoid arthritis yields sequence variants that have large effects on risk of the seropositive subset

OBJECTIVES

To find causal genes for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its seropositive (RF and/or ACPA positive) and seronegative subsets.

METHODS

We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 31 313 RA cases (68% seropositive) and ~1 million controls from Northwestern Europe. We searched for causal genes outside the HLA-locus through effect on coding, mRNA expression in several tissues and/or levels of plasma proteins (SomaScan) and did network analysis (Qiagen).

RESULTS

We found 25 sequence variants for RA overall, 33 for seropositive and 2 for seronegative RA, altogether 37 sequence variants at 34 non-HLA loci, of which 15 are novel. Genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of these yielded 25 causal genes in seropositive RA and additional two overall. Most encode proteins in the network of interferon-alpha/beta and IL-12/23 that signal through the JAK/STAT-pathway. Highlighting those with largest effect on seropositive RA, a rare missense variant in STAT4 (rs140675301-A) that is independent of reported non-coding STAT4-variants, increases the risk of seropositive RA 2.27-fold (p=2.1×10^-9), more than the rs2476601-A missense variant in PTPN22 (OR=1.59, p=1.3×10^-160). STAT4 rs140675301-A replaces hydrophilic glutamic acid with hydrophobic valine (Glu128Val) in a conserved, surface-exposed loop. A stop-mutation (rs76428106-C) in FLT3 increases seropositive RA risk (OR=1.35, p=6.6×10^-11). Independent missense variants in TYK2 (rs34536443-C, rs12720356-C, rs35018800-A, latter two novel) associate with decreased risk of seropositive RA (ORs=0.63-0.87, p=10^-9-10^-27) and decreased plasma levels of interferon-alpha/beta receptor 1 that signals through TYK2/JAK1/STAT4.

CONCLUSION

Sequence variants pointing to causal genes in the JAK/STAT pathway have largest effect on seropositive RA, while associations with seronegative RA remain scarce.

P-517 Validating reference gene expression stability in human ovarian follicles, oocytes, cumulus cells, ovarian medulla, and ovarian cortex tissue

Study question

How does the expression stability of commonly used reference genes (RG) vary in different human ovarian cells and tissues?

Summary answer

The RG stability differed among human ovarian cell types and tissues, but an RG with high stability was identified for each cell and tissue type.

What is known already

The expression of RGs used to normalize RT-qPCR may vary between different tissues, cell types, and experimental conditions. Hence, selecting the most appropriate RGs is critical in any experimental design to interpret data generated by RT-qPCR with the best accuracy. Human ovarian cells are phenotypically very different and often only available in limited amounts. In several animal species RG expression stability has been validated in oocytes and other ovarian cells, however, the suitability of a single universal RG in the different human ovarian cells and tissues has not been determined.

Study design, size, duration

This is an experimental study performed at a university hospital from January 2021 to September 2021.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

The freely available NormFinder software was used to analyze the expression stability of five commonly used RGs (GAPDH, B2M, RPLP0, ACTB, and PPIA) in human oocytes (n = 160), preantral follicles (n = 160), cumulus cells (n = 13), ovarian medulla (n = 8), and ovarian cortex tissue (n = 60). Samples were collected from 29 patients (aged 28 years on average; range 14–36) undergoing unilateral oophorectomy and ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation.

Main results and the role of chance

The Normfinder software identified ACTB as the best RG for oocytes and cumulus cells; and B2M for medulla tissue and isolated follicles. Overall, comparisons of the cycle threshold (Ct) values demonstrated a wide variation among the RGs within the same group of samples (P &lt; 0.05), especially for oocytes and preantral follicles with normalized RNA. The genes ACTB and RPLP0 showed the highest levels of expression and PPIA the lowest levels of expression in all types of samples, except for cortex tissue, where PPIA had the highest level of expression and B2M the lowest. These results infer that different results could be obtained when using different RGs for data normalization. The combination of two RGs only marginally increased stability, indicating that using a single validated RG would be sufficient when the available testing material is limited. For cultured ovarian cortex culture, GAPDH or ACTB were found to be the most stable genes depending on culture conditions.

Limitations, reasons for caution

Since human oocytes are scarce and contain a small amount of RNA, only five RGs were evaluated. Moreover, only germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes and preantral follicles (60-80 µm) were tested. Future studies may validate other genes and investigate the effect of oocyte maturation and follicle growth on RG stability.

Wider implications of the findings

Our findings highlight the importance of validating RGs for each cell type or tissue and culture condition. Hence, our results can be of use as guidance for future studies involving gene expression analyses in human ovarian cells and tissues, including oocytes and preantral follicles.

Trial registration number

Not applicable

POS1498-HPR NEWLY DIAGNOSED WITH INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS – DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPLEX SELF-MANAGEMENT INTERVENTION

Background

People newly diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis (IA) request regular consultations and support from health professionals (HPRs) in rheumatology to manage physiological, emotional, and social challenges. Evidence suggests that providing a tailored tailormade multi-component self-management program may benefit disease management (1). However, there is a lack of evidence in interventions with multiple components targeting people newly diagnosed with IA.

Objectives

To develop a complex evidence- and theory-based intervention in co-creation with patients and HPRs for better self-management in newly diagnosed people with IA in a rheumatology out-patient clinic.

Methods

This study followed the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework (2,3) for developing a complex intervention. The development phase comprised 1) identifying the evidence base, 2) identifying theory, 3) modelling process and outcomes, resulting in 4) a final description of all components and outcomes of the intervention.

1) Identifying the evidence base

We conducted two literature reviews, on which, we described a preliminary nurse-led intervention.

2) Identifying theory

Given the fact that the theory of Self-management is built upon Social Cognitive Theory (4) this was chosen as the underlying theory along with Acceptance and Commitment Theory (5) to support our communication strategy.

3) Modelling process and outcomes

The preliminary intervention was discussed and further developed in seven workshops to ensure that the intervention was in accordance with patients’ needs and feasible in clinical practice. Three patients and 38 HPRs (nine therapists, 10 rheumatologists, one psychologist, one social worker, and 17 registered nurses) attended.

During the workshops we identified the competencies needed in the HPRs delivering the intervention. In addition, relevant outcomes to measure self-management in a subsequent feasibility study were discussed. Discussions were digitally recorded and analysed using Thematic Analysis (6). Subsequently, the project group discussed the analysis and consensus was reached.

Results

4) Description of all components and outcomes of the intervention

Our intervention, ready for testing in a feasibility study, was a 9-month nurse-led intervention, and consisted of four individual and two group sessions. A physiotherapist and an occupational therapist should attend the group sessions along with the nurse (Figure 1). All sessions should target inflammatory arthritis-specific self-management.

Figure 1.

Intervention activities and

A comprehensive intervention manual has been developed. Our patient research partner and experts in rheumatology and self-management commented on the content to secure content validity. Subsequently, we conducted cognitive interviews with the HPRs to determine the face validity of the manual. In addition, we completed a two-day competence program to train HPRs in delivering the intervention.

The selected patient reported outcomes were: Physical activity levels, Health assessment, Fatigue, Quality of life, Anxiety and depression, Illness intrusiveness, Illness perception, and Self-efficacy, supplemented with objective measures for diseases activity.

Conclusion

NISMA - a nurse-led complex self-management intervention embedded in a multidisciplinary team has been developed and described based on MRC’s framework for the development of complex interventions. The intervention is currently being tested in a feasibility study.

References

[1]Nikiphorou et al., Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 1. oct 2021.

[2]Skivington et al., BMJ. 30. sep. 2021.

[3]Craig et al., nt J Nurs Stud. may 2013.

[4]Bandura A. SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY.

[5]Newman et al., Lancet. oct 2004.

[6]Braun et al., Springer; 2019.

Acknowledgements

First, I would like to thank the patients and health professionals who attended the workshops.

Secondly, I would like to thank The Novo Nordic Foundation for funding.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0272 DEEP BREATHING INCREASES HEART RATE VARIABILITY IN HEALTHY PARTICIPANTS AND IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS: AN INTERVENTIONAL DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY

Background

Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) are known to have an autonomic dysfunction, especially reduced parasympathetic activity. The dysfunction can be measured through heart rate variability (HRV), an indicator of vagus nerve tone. Studies have found a potential anti-inflammatory effect of the vagus nerve and proposed vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as an anti-inflammatory treatment. A way of stimulating the vagus nerve non-invasively could be through deep breathing (DB).

Objectives

The aims of this study were to examine the dose-response of DB on HRV in healthy participants and to examine the reliability of the effect of DB on HRV in patients with RA and SLE across two days.

Methods

The study was designed as an interventional study, more specifically the healthy subjects participated in a dose-response study and the patients with RA and SLE participated in a study of reliability. Forty-one healthy participants performed DB for 5, 15, and 30 minutes (4 seconds of inspiration and 6 seconds of expiration) in a randomized order on three different days. Fifty-two patients with RA and SLE performed the optimal dose of DB found in healthy participants, and the intervention was repeated on two different days to examine the reliability of the effect. The outcome measure was HRV, which was derived from a 5-minute electrocardiogram recording measured twice before and three times after DB. The extracted HRV measures included in the further analysis were the time domain parameters: a) The standard deviation of the R-R intervals (SDNN), b) the root mean square of successive R-R intervals (RMSSD), and c) the proportion of NN50 (pairs of successive R-R intervals that differ more than 50 milliseconds) divided by the total number of R-R intervals (PNN50).

Results

Thirty minutes of DB increased HRV and was the optimal dose of DB in healthy participants. In patients with RA and SLE 30 minutes of DB increased all HRV-parameters similarly across two days indicating reliability, see Figure 1. The effect of DB remained for at least 30 minutes after the intervention.

Figure 1.

Bar chart showing the heart rate variability-parameters plotted as mean ± standard error in patients with RA and SLE. RA: Rheumatoid Arthritis. SLE: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. SDNN: The standard deviation of the R-R intervals. RMSSD: The root mean square of successive R-R intervals. PNN50: The proportion of NN50 (pairs of successive R-R intervals that differ more than 50 milliseconds) divided by the total number of R-R intervals.

Conclusion

DB increases HRV in healthy participants and in patients with RA and SLE, indicating a stimulation of the vagus nerve. Future studies are needed to investigate the potential anti-inflammatory effect as well.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank patients and research personnel at Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

OP0065 INFLIXIMAB BIOSIMILAR-TO-BIOSIMILAR SWITCHING IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES: CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN REAL-WORLD PATIENTS FROM THE DANBIO REGISTRY

Background

In routine care, biosimilar-to-biosimilar infliximab switching may occur to save costs (=non-medical switching). Previous studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of switches from originator infliximab to a corresponding biosimilar in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (1). However, the outcomes after switching from one infliximab biosimilar to a second infliximab biosimilar remain scarcely investigated.

Denmark has recently conducted a nationwide mandatory infliximab biosimilar-to-biosimilar switch.

Objectives

To investigate the effectiveness of infliximab biosimilar-to-biosimilar switch (CTP-13 to GP1111) among patients with RA, PsA and AxSpA, including patients who had previously switched from originator (originator-experienced) to CT-P13 as well as patients who were originator-naïve.

Methods

Observational cohort study based on DANBIO registry (for clinical data upon switch =baseline) linked with national patient registries (to identify prior comorbidities). Patients with RA, PsA or AxSpA who performed a biosimilar-to-biosimilar switch from CT-P13 to GP1111 between April 1st 2019 and February 1st 2020 were included. Patient were divided into two groups: originator-naïve and originator-experienced. Main outcomes in the two groups were one-year GP1111 treatment retention (Kaplan Meier “drug survival curves”) and changes in disease activity 4 months before versus 4 months after switch in individual patients. Also, factors associated with GP1111 treatment retention for both groups combined were explored with Cox proportional hazard regression analyses, stratified by diagnosis (univariate-, age-and gender adjusted and fully adjusted). Analyses were adjusted for relevant clinical factors (for details: see Table 1)

Table 1.

Baseline variables associated with GP1111 withdrawal (RA shown below, similar findings for PsA and AxSpA)

UnivariateAge- and gender adjustedMultivariateHR (95% CI)p-valueHR (95% CI)p-valueHR (95%CI)p-valueRAFemale gender0.9 (0.6-1.3)0.4-0.7 (0.5-1.2)0.2Age, years1.0 (0.9-1.0)0.9-1.0 (0.9-1.1)0.6Originator-experienced versus originator naïve to infliximab0.5 (0.3-0.8)0.0020.5 (0.3-0.8)0.0020.4 (0.2-0.9)0.01Methotrexate use, yes0.5 (0.3-0.7)<0.0010.5 (0.3-0.7)<0.0010.6 (0.4-0.9)0.01Comorbidities ≥11.1 (0.7-1.5)0.81.1 (0.7-1.5)0.80.9 (0.6-1.4)0.7In remission (yes)0.4 (0.3-0.6)<0.0010.4 (0.2-0.6)<0.0010.5 (0.3-0.7)<0.001DAS281.7 (1.4-1.9)<0.0011.7 (1.5-1.9)<0.001--Patient global VAS, mm1.0 (1.0-1.1)<0.0011.0 (1.0-1.1)<0.001--

Results

In total, 1,605 patients underwent an infliximab biosimilar-to-biosimilar switch and were included; 1,171 were originator-naïve and 434 were originator-experienced, 685 RA/314 PsA/606 AxSpA, median disease duration was 9 years, 42% were in DAS28/ASDAS remission at the time of switch.

At one year, 83% (95% CI 81-85) of the originator-naive and 92% (95% CI 90-95) of the originator-experienced switchers maintained GP1111 treatment (Figure 1). Changes in disease activity 4 months pre- and post-switch were close to zero for all disease activity measures (e.g. DAS28, ASDAS, VAS pain, not shown).

The risk of GP1111 withdrawal was lower in originator-experienced compared to originator-naïve patients in patients with RA and PsA: HR 0.4 (95% CI 0.2-0.9, p-value 0.01) and HR 0.1 (0.1-0.6, p=0.01), but not significantly for AxSpA 0.56 (0.27-1.13, p=0.1). Across all indications, lower disease activity at baseline (DAS28/ASDAS remission) was associated with higher retention (Table 1).

Conclusion

Biosimilar-to-biosimilar infliximab switch was effective and well-tolerated in >1,500 real-world patients. Retention was higher in originator-experienced switchers and patients, who were in remission at the time of the switch, suggesting retention to be more affected by patient-related than drug-related factors.

References

[1]Glintborg et al, ARD, 2017; 76: 1426–1431

Acknowledgements

We thank departments reporting to the DANBIO registry.

Disclosure of Interests

Hafsah Nabi Grant/research support from: Research grant from Sandoz, who had no influence on the analysis, interpretation and presentation of data., Merete L. Hetland Speakers bureau: Biogen, Celltrion, Janssen Biologics B.V, MSD, Pfizer, Samsung Biopis, Consultant of: Biogen, Celltrion, Janssen Biologics B.V, MSD, Pfizer,

Samsung Biopis, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Biogen, BMS, Eli Lilly Denmark A/S,

Lundbeck Fond, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Novartis, Anne Gitte Loft Paid instructor for: AbbVie, Eli Lilly Denmark A/S, Janssen- Cilag A/S, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly Denmark A/S, Janssen-Cilag

A/S, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Oliver Hendricks Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, Dorte Jensen: None declared, Jens Kristian Pedersen: None declared, Søren Andreas Just: None declared, Kamilla Danebod: None declared, Heidi Lausten Munk: None declared, Salome Kristensen: None declared, Natalia Manilo: None declared, Ada Colic: None declared, Asta Linauskas: None declared, Pia Høger Thygesen: None declared, Louise Brot Christensen: None declared, Maren Høgberget Kalisz: None declared, Niels Lomborg: None declared, Jolanta Grydehøj: None declared, Johnny Raun: None declared, Rabiah Ahmed: None declared, Frank Mehnert: None declared, Niels Steen Krogh: None declared, Bente Glintborg Grant/research support from: BMS, Pfizer, Sandoz.

POS0761 TIME-DEPENDENT ANALYSES OF CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS IDENTIFY PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK OF INCIDENT PROTEINURIA

Background

Nephritis (LN) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is still a major determinant of poor prognosis[1].

The vast majority of LN occurs in proximity to the SLE diagnosis[2]. Identification of individuals at high risk, especially early onset SLE, is therefore warranted. Inclusion of risk factors prior to the SLE diagnosis may thus be of importance to enable sufficient risk factor profiling. SLE-patients seem to cluster according to clinical and serological phenotypes suggesting distinct disease trajectories[3-5].

Objectives

To determine if incident proteinuria associated with the debut age of non-renal SLE characteristics.

Methods

Data of SLE patients from six Danish centers were obtained from the Danbio-database from 2017 – 2020. The occurrence and timing of proteinuria was compared with first time onset of any non-renal manifestations as defined by the 1997 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria. Cox-regression models were used to identify risk factors for incident proteinuria. Time from first occurring non-renal manifestation to incident proteinuria or censoring defined time at risk. Covariates were eliminated if p >0.01 in a ‘backwards’ manner. After the model reduction process p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

586 SLE patients, mainly white (94%) women (88%), mean age at inclusion of 34.6 years (standard deviation, SD = 0.6 years) and observed for a mean of 14.9 years (SD =0.5 years), were recruited. The cumulative prevalence of proteinuria was 40%. Male gender hazard ratio, HR = 1.35 (range 0.77-2.35), p=0.009, lymphopenia HR = 1.77 (range 1.24-2.52), p=0.005 were associated with incident proteinuria. In contrast, patients with discoid rash had lower risk of incident proteinuria HR 0.42 (range 0.21-0.83), p=0.01. Male patients with lymphopenia had the highest risk of proteinuria with a one-, 5- and 10-year risk of proteinuria ranging from 9-27%, 34-75% and 51-89 %, depending on the age at presentation (debut at 20, 30, 40 or 50 years). The corresponding risk-profiles for women with lymphopenia were 3-9%, 8-34% and 12-58%, respectively, as illustrated in Figure 1.

Conclusion

The occurrences of lymphopenia and discoid rash were oppositely associated with risk of incident proteinuria and the risk effects varied according to gender and patient age at onset of these manifestations. Thus, the risk of proteinuria may not be constant but could vary according to presentation of non-renal manifestations that may call for a differentiated clinical follow-up. Based on these findings, we suggest that the debut age of known prognostic factors, even prior to the SLE diagnosis should be considered when designing prognostic statistical models.

References

[1]Faurschou, M., et al., Prognostic factors in lupus nephritis: diagnostic and therapeutic delay increases the risk of terminal renal failure. J Rheumatol, 2006. 33(8): p. 1563-9.

[2]Hanly, J.G., et al., The frequency and outcome of lupus nephritis: results from an international inception cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2016. 55(2): p. 252-62.

[3]Diaz-Gallo, L.M., et al., Four Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Subgroups, Defined by Autoantibodies Status, Differ Regarding HLA-DRB1 Genotype Associations and Immunological and Clinical Manifestations. ACR Open Rheumatol, 2022. 4(1): p. 27-39.

[4]Jacobsen, S., et al., A multicentre study of 513 Danish patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. II. Disease mortality and clinical factors of prognostic value. Clin Rheumatol, 1998. 17(6): p. 478-84.

[5]Leffers, H.C.B., et al., Smoking associates with distinct clinical phenotypes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a nationwide Danish cross-sectional study. Lupus Sci Med, 2021. 8(1).

Disclosure of Interests

Martin Andersen Employee of: Novo Nordisk A/S: 2010-2014, Anders Stockmarr: None declared, Henrik Leffers: None declared, Anne Troldborg: None declared, Anne Voss: None declared, Salome Kristensen: None declared, Bent Deleuran: None declared, Lene Dreyer Speakers bureau: Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Galderma and Janssen, Grant/research support from: Grant from BMS outside the present work, Laura Johnsen: None declared, Ada Colic: None declared, Søren Jacobsen: None declared

POS1192 INCIDENCE AND RISK FACTORS OF COVID‑19 IN PATIENTS WITH VASCULITIS: A DANISH NATIONWIDE COHORT STUDY

Background

Patients with small vessel vasculitis (SVV) and large vessel vasculitis (LVV, including giant cell arteritis (GCA)) are considered at higher risk of infections compared to the general population, owing to their underlying condition and the use of immunosuppressive drugs. Thus, the risk of COVID-19 infection and related outcomes during the global pandemic is of immediate concern to rheumatologists worldwide.

Objectives

To estimate the incidence of COVID-19 hospitalisation in patients with vasculitis, and to evaluate the impact of glucocorticoid treatment on the outcome between March 2020 and February 2021.

Methods

With use of the Danish nationwide registers, a cohort of patients with LVV and SVV, respectively, and general population controls (GPCs) matched on age and gender was established. Hazard ratios (HR) for COVID-19 hospitalisation was estimated. National COVID-19 surveillance data was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of having had a positive SARS-CoV2 PCR test. Lastly, a nested case-control design and conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the impact of glucocorticoids on the risk of hospitalisation.

Results

Patients with SVV (n=1090) had an increased incidence of COVID-19 hospitalisation compared with GPCs (comorbidity-adjusted HR 2·73; 95% CI 1·64-4·55), whereas no increased risk was seen in patients with LVV. Patients with vasculitis had similar likelihoods of having had a positive PCR test as GPCs. Glucocorticoids did not increase the HR of hospitalisation among patients with LVV or SVV.

Conclusion

Patients with SVV were more likely to be admitted with COVID-19 than the GPCs. The impact of glucocorticoid treatment on the risk of hospitalisation needs further investigation.

References

[1]Cordtz R, Lindhardsen J, Soussi BG, et al. Incidence and severeness of COVID-19 hospitalization in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease: a nationwide cohort study from Denmark. Rheumatology. Published online 2020. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keaa897

[2]Rutherford MA, Scott J, Karabayas M, et al. Risk factors for severe outcomes in patients with systemic vasculitis & COVID-19: a bi-national registry-based cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol. Published online 2021. doi:10.1002/art.41728

[3]Tomelleri A, Sartorelli S, Campochiaro C, Baldissera EM, Dagna L. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with large-vessel vasculitis in Italy: A monocentric survey. Ann Rheum Dis. Published online 2020. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217600

Disclosure of Interests

Salome Kristensen: None declared, René Lindholm Cordtz: None declared, Kirsten Duch: None declared, Jesper Lindhardsen: None declared, Christian Torp-Pedersen Grant/research support from: Recieved grants from Bayer and Novo Nordisk outside the present work, Lene Dreyer Grant/research support from: Received research grant/research support from BMS, and speakers bureau from EliLilly and Galderma outside the present work.

POS1021 THE EFFECT OF CANNABIDIOL ON QUANTITATIVE SENSORY TESTING PARAMETERS IN PATIENTS WITH HAND OSTEOARTHRITIS AND PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL

Background

Cannabidiol (CBD) has been proposed as an analgesic/anti-inflammatory treatment modality for joint pain. This study is based on a randomised, placebo controlled, double blind study (NORDCAN), investigating the effect of CBD in patients with painful hand osteoarthritis or psoriatic arthritis [1].

Objectives

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of CBD on quantitative sensory testing (QST) parameters.

Methods

The present randomised, placebo controlled, double blind study included 128 patients with hand osteoarthritis or psoriatic arthritis with chronic pain of moderate intensity. The trial compared 12 weeks of 20-30 mg CBD treatment with placebo. The QST parameters were assessed at baseline and after treatment. Pressure pain thresholds was measured at the most painful finger joint (local site) and the shin of the right leg (distal non-painful site). Temporal summation of pain and conditioned pain modulation were assessed using computer-controlled cuff algometry with the tourniquets on lower leg at the level of the upper portion of the gastrocnemius.

Results

Baseline characteristics (demographics and pain) for the CBD treated group and placebo group were comparable. No significant differences were observed in QST variables between baseline and end of treatment when comparing CBD and placebo.

Conclusion

No differences in modulation in QST parameters were demonstrated in patients in treatment with 20-30 mg CBD compared to placebo. Further studies of patients with rheumatic diseases treated with different dosage of CBD are needed to clarify the effect of CBD on pain in this patient group.

References

[1]Vela J, Dreyer L, Petersen KK, Nielsen LA, Duch KS, Kristensen S. Cannabidiol treatment in hand osteoarthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Pain 2021;Publish Ah. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002466.

Figure 1.

Flow-diagram of participant in the NORDCAN study

Table 1.

Difference in QST outcomes after 12 weeks of treatment with CBD or placebo.

Placebo groupCBD groupDifference95% CIpDifference95% CIpPPT Joint, kPa*18.62-19 to 56.760.3242.561.95 to 86.310.03PPT Shin, kPa*35.02-8.72 to 78.760.115.88-30.12 to 41.890.75CPM, kPa3.23-2.11 to 8.580.173.92-1.75 to 9.590.17TSP0.18-0.58 to 0.940.640.12-0.41 to 0.650.63

* Assessed using handheld algometer.

Abbreviations: CPM, Conditioned pain modulation; PPT, Pressure pain threshold; TSP, Temporal summation of pain

Acknowledgements

The authors thank patients, research personnel, the patient research partners, the Danish Rheumatism Association and the Psoriasis Association for their contribution to the NORDCAN trial.

Disclosure of Interests

Jonathan Vela: None declared, Kristian Kjær Petersen: None declared, Lene Dreyer Grant/research support from: Has received research grants from BMS and honorariums from Eli Lilly, Galderma, and Janssen, Lars Arent-Nielsen Speakers bureau: Has received speaker and advisory fees from GSK, Pfizer and Grünenthal., Salome Kristensen: None declared

OP0022 DISEASE ACTIVITY-GUIDED TAPERING OF BIOLOGICS IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS: A RANDOMISED, OPEN-LABEL, EQUIVALENCE TRIAL

Background

Traditionally, biologics are maintained lifelong at standard dose in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) when sustained low disease activity (LDA) is reached. However, evidence of possible tapering is emerging but data on the optimal approach is lacking.

Objectives

The primary outcomes at 18 months follow-up are:

Methods

The BIODOPT trial was a randomised, open-label, equivalence trial (EudraCT 2017-001970-41). Eligible patients were adults with RA, PsA, or axSpA in LDA on stable biologic doses during ≥12 months. The randomisation ratio was 2:1 (tapering:continuation) stratified by diagnosis, centre, and repeated biologic failures. In the tapering group, the biologic dosing interval was prolonged by 25% every four months until flare or discontinuation. The continuation group was kept on their baseline biologic dosing interval; however, a small increase was allowed (as usual practise) if requested by the patient. The sample size calculation was based on a pre-defined equivalence margin of ±0.5 disease activity points (<half of the minimal important difference in DAS28-CRP [>1.2] or ASDAS [>1.1]) yielding a power of 87% for 180 enrolled patients. All analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population. Continuous outcomes were analysed with repeated-measures linear mixed-effects models with group, diagnosis, centre, repeated biologic failures, time point, and the interaction between group and time as fixed factors and the baseline value of the relevant variable as a covariate. Categorical outcomes were analysed using logistic regression with missing data imputed as trial failures.

Results

Between May, 2018, and March, 2020, 142 patients were enrolled of which 95 were randomised to tapering and 47 to continuation; inclusion was closed in April 2020 due to national implications of the coronavirus pandemic.

At 18 months, significantly more patients in the tapering group (35 patients [(37%]) achieved a significant reduction in their biologic dose (≥50%) compared to the continuation group (one patient [2%]), absolute risk difference (RD) 35%, 95%CI: 24% to 45%, p<0.0001, Table 1. Furthermore, disease activity at 18 months was within the equivalence margins of ±0.5, mean difference between groups 0.08, 95%CI: -0.12 to 0.29; Table 1 and Figure 1. Flares were more frequent in the tapering group (39 [41%] vs 10 [21%], RD 0.20, 95%CI: 0.04 to 0.35, p=0.011) but managed with rescue therapy (e.g. biologic dose escalation or glucocorticoids) as only one patient (1%) in the tapering group and three patients (6%) in the continuation group lost therapeutic response and were switched to another biological agent.

Table 1.

Comparison at 18 months in the ITT population

OutcomeTapering group N = 95Continuation group N = 47Group difference (95%CI)p-valuePrimary outcome:Biologics reduced to ≤50%, n (%)35 (37%)1 (2%)0.35 (0.24 to 0.45)<0.001Disease activity, LSMeans (SE)1.84 (0.15)1.75 (0.16)0.08 (-0.12 to 0.29)0.428Key secondary outcomes:Remission1, n (%)63 (66%)33 (70%)-0.04 (-0.20 to 0.12)0.637Low disease activity2, n (%)79 (83%)41 (87%)-0.04 (-0.16 to 0.08)0.511Flares3, n (%)39 (41%)10 (21%)0.20 (0.04 to 0.35)0.011

N: number, CI: confidence interval, LSMeans: Least squares means, SE: Standard error.

1: RA or PsA: DAS28-CRP <2.6. AxSpA: ASDAS <1.3.

2: RA or PsA: DAS28-CRP <3.2. AxSpA: ASDAS <2.1.

3: RA or PsA: ΔDAS28-CRP >1.2 or ΔDAS28-CRP >0.6 AND current DAS28-CRP ≥3.2. AxSpA: inflammatory back pain AND ΔASDAS ≥0.9 and/or ≥1 swollen joint.

Conclusion

Across IA conditions, a significant reduction of biologic dose is possible with disease activity-guided tapering while maintaining a similar disease activity state compared to continuation of biologic as usual care.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank patients, research personnel, and the patient research partners for their contribution to the BIODOPT trial, data manager JHW for technical support and for uploading the concealed allocation sequence, and CCH for data management. The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital is supported by a core grant from the Oak Foundation (OCAY-18-774-OFIL).

Disclosure of Interests

Line Uhrenholt Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Novartis, Robin Christensen: None declared, Lene Dreyer Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Galderma and Janssen, Grant/research support from: BMS (outside the present work), Ellen-Margrethe Hauge Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Sanofi, Sobi, and SynACT Pharma, Grant/research support from: Roche, Novartis, and Novo Nordic Foundation (outside the present work), Annette Schlemmer Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Anne Gitte Loft Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD, Novartis and UCB, Consultant of: Eli-Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, Novartis, and UCB, Mads Nyhuus Bendix Rasch Speakers bureau: Sobi, Hans Christian Horn: None declared, Katrine Gade: None declared, Peter C. Taylor Consultant of: AbbVie, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Fresenius, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer Inc, Roche, and Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Celgene, and Galapagos (outside the present work), Salome Kristensen: None declared.

POS0604 THE EFFECT OF TRANSCUTANEOUS AURICULAR VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION AND DEEP BREATHING EXERCISES ON HEART RATE VARIABILITY IN HEALTHY PARTICIPANTS AND PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are chronic autoimmune diseases associated with a reduced function of the autonomic nervous system including an impaired function of the vagus nerve (VN). The VN has potential anti-inflammatory effects, which could be utilized in a new treatment approach using vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). Different types of VNS exist, but no direct comparison has been made of the methods in patients with RA and SLE.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS) and deep breathing (DB) on vagal tone in patients with RA or SLE and healthy participants and to investigate the washout effect assessed through time domain heart rate variability (HRV) measures (RMSSD (root-mean-square of successive differences), SDNN (standard deviation of N-N intervals), and PNN50 (percentage of adjacent N-N intervals that differ from each other by more than 50 milliseconds)).

Methods

The study was designed as an open label cross-over study. 42 healthy participants and 52 patients with RA or SLE performed two interventions, 30 minutes of taVNS and 30 minutes of DB. The interventions were separated by at least 24 hours. Before each intervention, two 5-minutes ECG-recordings were made to determine the participants’ baseline HRV. After each intervention three 5-minutes ECG-recordings were conducted in the following 30 minutes to investigate the potential washout effect.

Results

Healthy participants: A significant increase in SDNN, RMSSD, and PNN50 were found after DB. SDNN increased significantly immediately after taVNS. SDNN was significantly higher after DB compared to taVNS. Otherwise, there were no significant differences between the effects of the two interventions. Patients: A significant increase in SDNN, RMSSD, and PNN50 were present after both DB and taVNS. No significant differences were found between the effects of the two interventions. The effects of the interventions were still measurable 30 minutes after intervention, indicating no washout.

Conclusion

DB causes the greatest increase in HRV for healthy participants, while both DB and taVNS can equally elevate HRV in patients with RA and SLE, which support their use as a potential new treatment approach. However, their clinical effect needs to be investigated in future studies.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank patients and research personnel at Aalborg University Hospital.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0076 DRUG SURVIVAL OF BIOLOGICS AND NOVEL IMMUNOMODULATORS FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS, AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS, PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS, AND PSORIASIS - A NATIONWIDE COHORT STUDY FROM THE DANBIO AND DERMBIO REGISTRIES

Background

Drug survival is an important proxy measure for effectiveness of treatments for inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and psoriasis [1-4].

Objectives

The objective of this study was to examine the real-life drug survival of biologics and novel small-molecule therapies across various disease entities such as RA, AxSpA, PsA, and psoriasis.

Methods

We performed a nationwide cohort study using the prospective nationwide registries DANBIO and DERMBIO, comprising all patients treated with biologics or novel small-molecule therapies for RA, AxSpA, PsA, and psoriasis between January 2015 through May 2021 (DANBIO) and November 2009 to November 2019 (DERMBIO). Drug survival was visualized using Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate adjusted Hazard Ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of discontinuing therapy.

Results

The study comprised a total of 12,089 patients (17,903 treatment series), including 5,104 RA patients (7,867 series), 2,157 AxSpA patients (3,016 series3), 2,551 PsA patients (3,313 series), and 2,577 psoriasis patients (3,707 series). In confounder-adjusted models drug survival in RA was highest for rituximab followed by baricitinib, etanercept and tocilizumab respectively. For AxSpA drug survival was high for golimumab compared to all other drugs, followed by secukinumab and etanercept and lowest for infliximab. For PsA tofacitinib and infliximab had the lowest drug survival compared to all other drugs. All other drugs performed almost equally well with a tendency of a generally higher drug survival for golimumab, followed by secukinumab and ixekizumab. For psoriasis drug survival was generally highest for guselkumab.

Figure 1.

Conclusion

Differing treatment responses to drugs with various types of action across RA, AxSpA, PsA and psoriasis emphasize that although these diseases have many overlaps in their pathogenesis, there is a need for an individualized treatment approach that considers the underlying disease, patient profile, and treatment history.

References

[1]Egeberg A, Ottosen MB, Gniadecki R, et al. Safety, efficacy and drug survival of biologics and biosimilars for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 2018; 178(2): 509-19.

[2]Gron KL, Glintborg B, Norgaard M, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Certolizumab Pegol, Abatacept, and Biosimilar Infliximab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated in Routine Care: Observational Data From the Danish DANBIO Registry Emulating a Randomized Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019; 71(12): 1997-2004.

[3]Lindstrom U, Glintborg B, Di Giuseppe D, et al. Comparison of treatment retention and response to secukinumab versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology 2020.

[4]Glintborg B, Lindstrom U, Di Giuseppe D, et al. One-year treatment outcomes of secukinumab versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the substantial contribution of the academic hospitals and private clinics and their physicians that report data to DANBIO and DERMBIO.

Disclosure of Interests

Alexander Egeberg Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Almirall, Leo Pharma, Zuellig Pharma Ltd., Galápagos NV, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Galderma, Dermavant, UCB, Mylan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Paid instructor for: AbbVie, Almirall, Leo Pharma, Zuellig Pharma Ltd., Galápagos NV, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Galderma, Dermavant, UCB, Mylan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Consultant of: AbbVie, Almirall, Leo Pharma, Zuellig Pharma Ltd., Galápagos NV, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Galderma, Dermavant, UCB, Mylan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Nana Lippert Rosenoe: None declared, David Aagaard: None declared, Erik Lørup: None declared, Lea Nymand: None declared, Lars Erik Kristensen Speakers bureau: Dr. LE Kristensen has received fees for speaking and consultancy from Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, Forward pharma, UCB, Gilead, Biogen, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Eli Lilly, and Janssen pharmaceuticals, Paid instructor for: Dr. LE Kristensen has received fees for speaking and consultancy from Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, Forward pharma, UCB, Gilead, Biogen, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Eli Lilly, and Janssen pharmaceuticals, Consultant of: Dr. LE Kristensen has received fees for speaking and consultancy from Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, Forward pharma, UCB, Gilead, Biogen, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Eli Lilly, and Janssen pharmaceuticals, Grant/research support from: Dr. LE Kristensen has received fees for speaking and consultancy from Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, Forward pharma, UCB, Gilead, Biogen, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Eli Lilly, and Janssen pharmaceuticals, Jacob Thyssen Speakers bureau: Dr. Thyssen has attended advisory boards for Almirall, Eli Lilly & Co, Pfizer, LEO Pharma, Asana, Regeneron, AbbVie, Union Therapeutics, and Sanofi-Genzyme and received speaker honorarium from LEO Pharma, Regeneron, Almirall, Abbvie, Eli Lilly & Co, and Sanofi-Genzyme, and been an investigator for AbbVie, Pfizer, Eli Lilly & Co, LEO Pharma and Sanofi-Genzyme., Paid instructor for: Dr. Thyssen has attended advisory boards for Almirall, Eli Lilly & Co, Pfizer, LEO Pharma, Asana, Regeneron, AbbVie, Union Therapeutics, and Sanofi-Genzyme and received speaker honorarium from LEO Pharma, Regeneron, Almirall, Abbvie, Eli Lilly & Co, and Sanofi-Genzyme, and been an investigator for AbbVie, Pfizer, Eli Lilly & Co, LEO Pharma and Sanofi-Genzyme., Consultant of: Dr. Thyssen has attended advisory boards for Almirall, Eli Lilly & Co, Pfizer, LEO Pharma, Asana, Regeneron, AbbVie, Union Therapeutics, and Sanofi-Genzyme and received speaker honorarium from LEO Pharma, Regeneron, Almirall, Abbvie, Eli Lilly & Co, and Sanofi-Genzyme, and been an investigator for AbbVie, Pfizer, Eli Lilly & Co, LEO Pharma and Sanofi-Genzyme., Grant/research support from: Dr. Thyssen has attended advisory boards for Almirall, Eli Lilly & Co, Pfizer, LEO Pharma, Asana, Regeneron, AbbVie, Union Therapeutics, and Sanofi-Genzyme and received speaker honorarium from LEO Pharma, Regeneron, Almirall, Abbvie, Eli Lilly & Co, and Sanofi-Genzyme, and been an investigator for AbbVie, Pfizer, Eli Lilly & Co, LEO Pharma and Sanofi-Genzyme., Simon F. Thomsen Speakers bureau: Dr. Thomsen has been a speaker or has served on advisory boards for Sanofi-Genzyme, AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Almirall, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; has received research support from Sanofi-Genzyme, AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Novartis, UCB Pharma, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; and has been an investigator for Sanofi-Genzyme, Regeneron, AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Novartis and Pfizer., Paid instructor for: Dr. Thomsen has been a speaker or has served on advisory boards for Sanofi-Genzyme, AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Almirall, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; has received research support from Sanofi-Genzyme, AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Novartis, UCB Pharma, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; and has been an investigator for Sanofi-Genzyme, Regeneron, AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Novartis and Pfizer., Consultant of: Dr. Thomsen has been a speaker or has served on advisory boards for Sanofi-Genzyme, AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Almirall, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; has received research support from Sanofi-Genzyme, AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Novartis, UCB Pharma, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; and has been an investigator for Sanofi-Genzyme, Regeneron, AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Novartis and Pfizer., Grant/research support from: Dr. Thomsen has been a speaker or has served on advisory boards for Sanofi-Genzyme, AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Almirall, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; has received research support from Sanofi-Genzyme, AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Novartis, UCB Pharma, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; and has been an investigator for Sanofi-Genzyme, Regeneron, AbbVie, LEO Pharma, Novartis and Pfizer., René Lindholm Cordtz: None declared, Nikolai Loft Speakers bureau: speaker for Eli Lilly and Janssen Cilag., Lone Skov Speakers bureau: Dr. Skov has been a paid speaker for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and LEO Pharma, and has been a consultant or has served on Advisory Boards with AbbVie, Janssen Cilag, Novartis, Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, UCB, Almirall, and Sanofi. She has served as an investigator for AbbVie, Sanofi, Janssen Cilag, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZenica, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Regeneron, and LEO Pharma, and has received research and educational grants from Novartis, Sanofi, Janssen Cilag, and LEO Pharma., Paid instructor for: Dr. Skov has been a paid speaker for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and LEO Pharma, and has been a consultant or has served on Advisory Boards with AbbVie, Janssen Cilag, Novartis, Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, UCB, Almirall, and Sanofi. She has served as an investigator for AbbVie, Sanofi, Janssen Cilag, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZenica, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Regeneron, and LEO Pharma, and has received research and educational grants from Novartis, Sanofi, Janssen Cilag, and LEO Pharma., Consultant of: Dr. Skov has been a paid speaker for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and LEO Pharma, and has been a consultant or has served on Advisory Boards with AbbVie, Janssen Cilag, Novartis, Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, UCB, Almirall, and Sanofi. She has served as an investigator for AbbVie, Sanofi, Janssen Cilag, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZenica, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Regeneron, and LEO Pharma, and has received research and educational grants from Novartis, Sanofi, Janssen Cilag, and LEO Pharma., Grant/research support from: Dr. Skov has been a paid speaker for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and LEO Pharma, and has been a consultant or has served on Advisory Boards with AbbVie, Janssen Cilag, Novartis, Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, UCB, Almirall, and Sanofi. She has served as an investigator for AbbVie, Sanofi, Janssen Cilag, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZenica, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Regeneron, and LEO Pharma, and has received research and educational grants from Novartis, Sanofi, Janssen Cilag, and LEO Pharma., Lars Erik Bryld: None declared, Mads Rasmussen Speakers bureau: Dr. Rasmussen has been a paid speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, and LEO Pharma. Consulting, or serving on expert/advisory boards with AbbVie, Almirall, Janssen Cilag, and Eli Lilly. He served as investigator for Janssen Cilag, UCB, and Novartis., Paid instructor for: Dr. Rasmussen has been a paid speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, and LEO Pharma. Consulting, or serving on expert/advisory boards with AbbVie, Almirall, Janssen Cilag, and Eli Lilly. He served as investigator for Janssen Cilag, UCB, and Novartis., Consultant of: Dr. Rasmussen has been a paid speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, and LEO Pharma. Consulting, or serving on expert/advisory boards with AbbVie, Almirall, Janssen Cilag, and Eli Lilly. He served as investigator for Janssen Cilag, UCB, and Novartis., Grant/research support from: Dr. Rasmussen has been a paid speaker for AbbVie, Almirall, and LEO Pharma. Consulting, or serving on expert/advisory boards with AbbVie, Almirall, Janssen Cilag, and Eli Lilly. He served as investigator for Janssen Cilag, UCB, and Novartis., Pil Højgaard: None declared, Salome Kristensen: None declared, Lene Dreyer Speakers bureau: Dr. Dreyer has received research grant/research support from BMS, and speakers bureau from Eli Lilly and Galderma., Paid instructor for: Dr. Dreyer has received research grant/research support from BMS, and speakers bureau from Eli Lilly and Galderma., Consultant of: Dr. Dreyer has received research grant/research support from BMS, and speakers bureau from Eli Lilly and Galderma., Grant/research support from: Dr. Dreyer has received research grant/research support from BMS, and speakers bureau from Eli Lilly and Galderma.

AB0006 ESTABLISHED RISK LOCI FOR SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS AT NCF2, STAT4, TNPO3, IRF5 AND ITGAM ASSOCIATE WITH DISTINCT CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS: A DANISH GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY

Background

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been associated with more than 100 genetic loci. This parallels positively to the clinical diversity that is reflected by the classification of SLE.

Objectives

We aimed to investigate associations between disease manifestations of SLE and risk gene variants relevant to Danish subjects of European ancestry.

Methods

We included 427 SLE patients of European ancestry similar to previous reports.[1] We also included 89,699 controls from the Danish Blood Donor Study Genomic Cohort. SLE risk loci in this population were identified by genome-wide association methodology and hereafter correlated to cumulative occurrence of SLE classification items.

Results

Fourteen variants mapped to the following genes: NCF2, STAT4, TNPO3/TPI1P2, IRF5, and ITGAM, were significantly associated (p<5E-8) with SLE.

The five lead variants were associated (p<0.05) with the following manifestations; NCF2: proteinuria and anti-phospholipid antibodies, STAT4: arthritis, serositis, neurologic disorder, lymphopenia, and anti-Smith antibodies, IRF5: seizures and proteinuria, TNPO3: proteinuria, and ITGAM: photosensitivity (Table 2).

Conclusion

Our findings support the future use of select, relevant genetic markers in predicting various SLE phenotypes.

References

[1]Leffers HCB, Troldborg A, Voss A, et al. Smoking associates with distinct clinical phenotypes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a nationwide Danish cross-sectional study. Lupus Sci Med 2021;8(1).

Table 1.

Associations between five SLE risk loci and specific disease manifestations in 427 Danish patients with SLE*.

NCF2STAT4IRF5TNPO3ITGAMrs17849502_Trs7574865_Trs4728142_Ars13239597_Ars11860650_TN (%)Malar rash233 (55%)1.28 (0.84-1.96)0.83 (0.62-1.11)1.01 (0.74-1.38)1.44 (0.97-2.12)1.14 (0.80-1.61)Discoid rash46 (11%)1.49 (0.81-2.73)0.90 (0.56-1.45)1.01 (0.62-1.66)1.16 (0.63-2.12)0.76 (0.42-1.41)Photosensitivity219 (51%)0.96 (0.63-1.46)1.09 (0.81-1.47)0.98 (0.71-1.34)0.84 (0.57-1.25)0.67 (0.47-0.97)Oral ulcers132 (31%)0.96 (0.61-1.50)0.90 (0.65-1.23)0.83 (0.60-1.16)1.30 (0.87-1.96)1.43 (0.99-2.05)Non-erosive Arthritis342 (80%)0.84 (0.52-1.37)1.49 (1.02-2.18)0.93 (0.63-1.36)1.04 (0.64-1.68)1.16 (0.74-1.80)Serositis-Pleuritis124 (29%)0.63 (0.38-1.05)1.38 (1.01-1.89)1.22 (0.87-1.72)0.85 (0.56-1.29)0.84 (0.57-1.24)-Pericarditis72 (17%)0.75 (0.41-1.40)1.35 (0.93-1.96)1.05 (0.70-1.58)1.15 (0.70-1.89)1.09 (0.70-1.72)Persistent proteinuria158 (37%)1.63 (1.07-2.49)1.08 (0.80-1.46)0.68 (0.49-0.94)1.74 (1.16-2.61)1.09 (0.76-1.57)Neurologic disorder-Seizures23 (5%)1.58 (0.75-3.35)1.49 (0.80-2.76)2.10 (1.04-4.25)0.61 (0.26-1.44)0.93 (0.42-2.06)-Psychosis8 (2%)0.76 (0.097-5.87)2.77 (0.94-8.15)0.35 (0.10-1.23)0 (0)2.96 (0.85-10.3)Haematologic disorder-Haemolytic anaemia38 (9%)0.78 (0.34-1.76)1.37 (0.85-2.22)0.75 (0.44-1.29)1.11 (0.57-2.19)1.24 (0.70-2.20)-Leukopenia130 (30%)1.04 (0.67-1.61)1.19 (0.87-1.63)1.00 (0.72-1.39)0.90 (0.60-1.37)0.94 (0.64-1.37)-Lymphopenia228 (53%)0.95 (0.63-1.44)1.35 (1.01-1.81)0.95 (0.70-1.29)1.16 (0.79-1.70)1.09 (0.77-1.54)-Thrombocytopenia102 (24%)1.42 (0.91-2.22)0.84 (0.60-1.18)0.83 (0.58-1.18)1.35 (0.86-2.11)0.91 (0.60-1.37)Immunologic disorder-anti-DNA ab.330 (77%)0.69 (0.44-1.09)1.02 (0.72-1.44)0.94 (0.65-1.35)0.97 (0.62-1.53)1.08 (0.71-1.65)-anti-Smith ab.44 (10%)1.44 (0.79-2.64)1.58 (1.00-2.49)1.23 (0.73-2.07)1.47 (0.80-2.69)1.07 (0.61-1.84)-anti-phospholipid ab.183 (43%)1.63 (1.07-2.49)1.05 (0.79-1.41)0.84 (0.61-1.14)1.14 (0.77-1.68)1.14 (0.80-1.62)

* Logistic regression models for each manifestation included all five lead variants (multivariate) and were adjusted for age and sex

Disclosure of Interests

Henrik Leffers: None declared, David Westergaard: None declared, Saedis Saevarsdottir: None declared, Ingileif Jonsdottir: None declared, Ole Birger Pedersen: None declared, Anne Troldborg: None declared, Anne Voss: None declared, Salome Kristensen: None declared, Jesper Lindhardsen: None declared, Prabhat Kumar: None declared, Asta Linauskas: None declared, Lars Juul: None declared, Niels Steen Krogh: None declared, Bent Deleuran: None declared, Lene Dreyer Speakers bureau: Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Galderma and Janssen, Grant/research support from: from BMS outside the present work, Michael Schwinn: None declared, Lise wegner Thørner: None declared, Lotte Hindhede: None declared, Christian Erikstrup: None declared, Henrik Ullum: None declared, Søren Brunak Shareholder of: SB has ownerships in Intomics A/S, Hoba Therapeutics Aps, Novo Nordisk A/S, Lundbeck A/S, Kari Stefansson: None declared, Karina Banasik: None declared, Søren Jacobsen: None declared

OP0173 INCIDENCE OF COVID-19 INFECTION AND HOSPITALISATION ACCORDING TO VACCINATION STATUS AND DMARD TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A NATIONWIDE MATCHED COHORT STUDY FROM DENMARK

Background

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may have impaired immunogenicity to COVID-19 vaccines.

Objectives

To investigate the incidence of COVID-19 infection and hospitalisation in unvaccinated and vaccinated patients with RA compared with matched individuals; and secondarily in patients with RA according to DMARD treatment.

Methods

Danish nationwide matched cohort study from January to October 2021. Patients with RA were identified in DANBIO and matched 1:20 with individuals from the general population on age, sex, and vaccination status (month and exact type of vaccination). Primary and secondary outcomes were COVID-19 hospitalisation (Danish National Patient Register) and positive SARS-CoV2 PCR test (Danish COVID-19 Surveillance Register), respectively. Stratified by vaccination status, incidence rates (IRs) per 1000 person years (PY) and comorbidity-adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) in cause-specific Cox models were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 hospitalisations was visualised according to RA and vaccine exposure status.

Results

Regardless of vaccination status, patients with RA had increased incidence of COVID-19 hospitalisation compared to matched individuals (Table 1). However, the absolute risk was 0.20% for unvaccinated patients at 60 days and 0.08% for comparators, whereas it remained below 0.05% at 180 days of follow-up in both groups when fully vaccinated (Figure 1). Increased SARS-CoV2 infection rates were seen only among unvaccinated patients with RA (Table 1). Unadjusted analyses showed increased incidence of COVID-19 hospitalisation among rituximab-treated compared with conventional DMARD treated: unvaccinated HR 4.71 (1.98 to 11.18) and vaccinated HR 11.69 (2.07 to 66.06). However, the proportions of patients with previous cancer and treated with prednisolone were higher among the rituximab treated.

Table 1.UnvaccinatedPartially vaccinatedFully vaccinatedRAControlsRAControlsRAControlsN28 447568 94027 154542 61026 217523 826Women, %71.371.371.271.271.071.0Age in years, median [IQR]67.7 [34.2 to 88.3]67.8 [34.2 to 88.4]68.4 [36.4 to 88.6]68.4 (36.5 to 88.6)68.9 [40.9 to 88.7]68.9 (41.0 to 88.7)Methotrexate /55.5 /0.5 /55.4 /1.2 /55.7 /1.3 /Sulfasalazine /14.2 /0.1 /13.7 /0.3 /13.5 /0.3 /Hydroxychloroquine /10.4 /0.1 /10.3 /0.0 /10.3 /0.0 /Other csDMARD,11.0 /0.2 /10.7 /0.3 /10.6 /0.3 /Prednisolone,all in %12.52.012.20.512.20.5TNFi /16.9 /0.1 /17.2 /2.9 /17.1 /3.1 /abatacept /1.5 /0.0 /1.5 /0.5 /1.5 /0.5 /tocilizumab /3.0 /0.0 /3.0 /0.0 /2.9 /0.0 /rituximab, all in %2.20.12.10.12.10.1COVID-19 hospitalisationN65727119511131Median [IQR] days of follow-up102 [62 to 137]115 [88 to 146]28 [22 to 35]30 (21 to 39)150 [111 to 189]150 (111 to 189)Rate per 1000 PY10.4 (8.0 to 13.4)4.7 (4.3 to 5.1)5.5 (3.0 to 10.0)2.2 (1.8 to 2.7)0.9 (0.5 to 1.6)0.5 (0.4 to 0.6)Adjusted HRa1.88 (1.44 to 2.46)1 (Ref.)2.47 (1.25 to 4.89)1 (Ref.)1.94 (1.03 to 3.66)1 (Ref.)SARS-CoV2 infectionRate per 1000 PY37.8 (33.6 to 42.6)33.9 (33.1 to 34.8)27 (20.7 to 35.1)28.5 (27 to 30.2)11.3 (9.2 to 13.9)10.4 (9.9 to 10.9)Adjusted HRa1.22 (1.09 to 1.57)1 (Ref.)0.87 (0.95 to 1.74)1 (Ref.)1.09 (0.92 to 1.14)1 (Ref.)

IQR, Interquartile range. a Adjusted for cancer history, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and chronic lung disease.

Figure 1.

Cumulative incidence of COVID-19 hospitalisation (%) as a function of follow-up time (days) for (A) unvaccinated, (B) partially vaccinated and (C) fully vaccinated patients and comparators.

Conclusion

The incidence of COVID-19 hospitalisation was increased for both unvaccinated and vaccinated patients with RA compared with controls. Importantly, the parallel decreasing risk for patients with RA suggests a comparable relative benefit of vaccination. Less favourable outcomes among rituximab-treated warrant that this drug should be considered with extra care.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge The Danish Departments of Clinical Microbiology and Statens Serum Institut for carrying out laboratory analysis, registration, and release of the national SARS-CoV-2 surveillance data use in the present study. Further, the authors wish to thank all the Danish departments of rheumatology for reporting to the DANBIO register.

Disclosure of Interests

René Cordtz: None declared, Salome Kristensen: None declared, Rasmus Westermann: None declared, Kirsten Duch: None declared, Fiona Pearce Grant/research support from: Pearce reports a grant from Vifor Pharma outside the submitted work., Jesper Lindhardsen: None declared, Christian Torp-Pedersen Grant/research support from: Torp-Pedersen reports grants from Bayer and Novo Nordisk outside the submitted work., Mikkel Porsborg Andersen: None declared, Lene Dreyer Speakers bureau: Dreyer has received speakers bureau from Eli Lilly and Galderma., Grant/research support from: Dreyer has received research grant/support from BMS.

FC059: Cardiovascular Outcomes in Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody Associated Vasculitis in Denmark 1996–2018

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated vasculitis (AAV) is a group of autoimmune systemic inflammatory diseases, with cardiovascular disease being the leading cause of death. However, large-scale real-world data on the risk of long-term cardiovascular outcomes associated with AAV are limited. Therefore, to understand, screen and optimize prevention of cardiovascular disease in AAV patients, we investigated the risk of long-term ischemic cardiovascular events, including ischemic heart disease, coronary angiogram (CAG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and ventricular arrhythmia/use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) devices. Secondary outcomes included heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke, venous thrombotic events and cardiac arrest.

METHOD

We included all incident patients with AAV diagnosed during 1996–2018. Patients were identified from the Danish nationwide healthcare registries by use of a recently validated method (positive predictive value of 97%) [1] comprising at least two consecutive hospital encounters registered as either polyangiitis with granulomatosis or microscopic polyangiitis (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition [ICD-10]: DM31.3 and DM31.7). Patients with AAV were matched 1:3 with controls from the general population on age and gender. We computed adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for each cardiovascular outcome, with all-cause mortality accounted for as a competing risk. G-computation of HRs was performed to estimate 5-year absolute risks standardized to the distribution of risk factors in the population.

RESULTS

A total of 2306 AAV patients [median age: 62.9 years (25th–75th percentile: 50.9–72.0 years), 52.6% male gender] were matched with 6918 controls. Median study follow-up was 9.5 years (25th–75th percentile: 5.3–15.8 years). Compared with controls, AAV patients had a higher rate of ischemic heart disease [HR 1.67 (95% CI 1.45–1.95)], myocardial infarction [HR 1.43 (95% CI 1.11–1.83)], CAG [HR 1.51 (95% CI 1.27–1.80)], PCI [HR 1.42 (95% CI 1.11–1.88)] and ventricular arrhythmia/ICD implantation [HR 2.03 (95% CI 1.17–3.55)]. Secondarily, AAV patients also had an increased rate of additional adverse cardiovascular events: HF [HR 1.77 (95% CI 1.48–2.11)], deep vein thrombosis [HR 2.89 (95% CI 2.24–3.72)], pulmonary embolism [HR 3.59 (95% CI 2.74–4.72)], AF [HR 1.73 (95% CI 1.51–1.98)], ischemic stroke [HR 1.34 (95% CI 1.12–1.61)] and in-hospital cardiac arrest [HR 1.97 (95% CI 1.29–2.99)]. AAV patients had a significantly increased standardized 5-year absolute risk of all outcomes except for MI, PCI and ventricular arrhythmia/ICD implantations compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

In this large nationwide registry-based follow-up study, AAV patients had a higher risk of ischemic cardiovascular events and were more likely to require revascularization therapy compared with matched control subjects. Moreover, AAV patients had a higher risk of HF, atrial- and ventricular arrhythmias as well as venous thrombotic events and ischemic stroke when compared with matched control subjects.

COVID-19 infection and hospitalization risk according to vaccination status and DMARD treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to investigate the incidence of COVID-19 hospitalization in unvaccinated and vaccinated patients with RA compared with matched controls, and in patients with RA according to DMARD treatment.

METHODS

This was a Danish nationwide matched-cohort study from January to October 2021. Patients with RA were identified in the DANBIO register and matched 1:20 with individuals from the general population on age, sex, and vaccination status. Primary and secondary outcomes were COVID-19 hospitalization (Danish National Patient Register) and first-time positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test (Danish COVID-19 Surveillance Register), respectively. Stratified by vaccination status, incidence rates (IRs) per 1000 person years (PYs) and comorbidity-adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) in cause-specific Cox models were calculated with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

In total, 28 447 unvaccinated patients and 568 940 comparators had IRs for COVID-19 hospitalization of 10.4 (8.0-13.4) and 4.7 (4.3-5.1) per 1000 PYs, respectively (aHR 1.88, 1.44-2.46). When fully vaccinated, corresponding IRs were 0.9 (0.5-1.6) and 0.5 (0.4-0.6) per 1000 PYs (aHR 1.94, 1.03-3.66). Unvaccinated RA patients had an aHR of 1.22 (1.09-1.57) for testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and 1.09 (0.92-1.14) among vaccinated RA patients. Vaccinated rituximab-treated patients had increased crude IR of COVID-19 hospitalization compared with conventional DMARD-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of COVID-19 hospitalization was increased for both unvaccinated and vaccinated patients with RA compared with controls. Importantly, the parallel decreasing risk for patients with RA suggests a comparable relative benefit of vaccination in most patients.

Isolation in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases during COVID-19 pandemic compared to healthy individuals: a questionnaire survey

As a result of the pandemic, many patients with an inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD) have isolated themselves. The lack of disease management together with fear of infection could lead to changes in physical- and mental health. The aim of this study was to evaluate the social- and health behaviour in patients with an IRD compared with the behaviour of healthy individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was a questionnaire survey answered by patients with an IRD and healthy individuals (HI). The questionnaire contained seven sections with questions regarding COVID-19 and quality of life including SF-36, EQ-5D-5L, and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, fatigue and global health. Of 1663 invited participants, 661 patients with IRD and 266 HI were included in the analyses. Patients with an IRD felt more isolated during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with HI (IRD: 9.5% (61/644), HI: 3.1% (8/259), p-value = 0.001). More HI (5.4%) had been infected with COVID-19 than patients with an IRD (1.7%). Among patients with an IRD those with worse self-reported disease activity outcomes (VAS pain, fatigue and global health, all p-value < 0.001), worse social functioning and emotional well-being were more isolated than individuals with low disease activity. Patients with an IRD feel more isolated during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to HI. Isolation seems to be most pronounced in patients with worse disease related patient-reported outcomes and lower quality of life.

Incidence and prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in Denmark from 1998 to 2018: a nationwide register-based study

Objective: To investigate the incidence and prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the adult Danish population.Method: In this nationwide register-based cohort study, patients with incident RA between 1998 and the end of 2018 were identified using Danish administrative registries. The age- and sex-standardized incidence rate (IR), incidence proportion (IP), lifetime risk (LR), and point prevalence (PP) of RA were calculated. RA was defined as a first-time RA diagnosis registered in the Danish National Patient Registry combined with a redeemed prescription of a conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug in the following year. In addition, three different case definitions of RA were explored.Results: The overall age- and sex-standardized IR of RA from 1998 to 2018 was 35.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 35.1-35.9] per 100 000 person-years while the IP was 35.2 (95% CI 34.8-35.5) per 100 000 individuals. The IR was two-fold higher for women than for men. The LR of RA ranged from 2.3% to 3.4% for women and from 1.1% to 1.5% for men, depending on the RA case definition used. The overall PP of RA was 0.6% (95% CI 0.5-0.6%) in 2018: 0.8% (95% CI 0.7-0.8%) for women and 0.3% (95% CI 0.3-0.4%) for men. The prevalence increased about 1.5-fold from 2000 to 2018.Conclusion: The IR and PP were approximately two-fold higher for women than for men. The prevalence of RA in Denmark increased significantly from 2000 to 2018. The RA case definition had more impact on the results than the choice of denominator.

Risk of flare after tapering or withdrawal of b-/tsDMARDs in patients with RA or axSpA: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate flare risk when tapering or withdrawing biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b-/tsDMARDs) compared to continuation in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) in sustained remission or low disease activity.

METHODS

Articles were identified in Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. Eligible trials were randomised, controlled trials comparing tapering and/or withdrawal of b- and/or tsDMARDs with standard dose in IA. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed with risk ratio (RR), or Peto's Odds Ratio (POR) for sparse events, and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

RESULTS

The meta-analysis comprised 22 trials: 11 assessed tapering and 7 addressed withdrawal (4 assessed both). Only trials with a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) population were identified. An increased flare risk was demonstrated when b-/tsDMARD tapering was compared to continuation, RR = 1.45 (95%CI: 1.19 to 1.77, I2 = 42.5%), and potentially increased for persistent flare, POR = 1.56 (95%CI: 0.97 to 2.52, I2 = 0%). Comparing tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) withdrawal to continuation, a highly increased flare risk (RR = 2.28, 95%CI: 1.78 to 2.93, I2 = 78%) and increased odds of persistent flare (POR = 3.41, 95%CI: 1.91 to 6.09, I2 = 49%) was observed. No clear difference in flare risk between RA or axSpA was observed.

CONCLUSION

A high risk for flare and persistent flare was demonstrated for TNFi withdrawal whereas an increased risk for flare but not for persistent flare was observed for b-/tsDMARD tapering. Thus, tapering seems to be the more favourable approach.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42019136905).

Is pain associated with premature mortality in patients with psoriatic arthritis? A nested case-control study using the DANBIO Register

OBJECTIVES

It has been hypothesized that the presence of chronic pain causes excess mortality. Since chronic pain is prevalent among patients with PsA this potential association should be explored. We aimed to investigate whether higher cumulative pain intensity is associated with an excess mortality risk in patients with PsA.

METHODS

A nested case-control study using data from the nationwide DANBIO Register (Danish Database for Biological Therapies in Rheumatology) Register and Danish healthcare registers. Cases were patients who died and corresponding to the date of death, matched on sex, year of birth and calendar period at the time of death with up to five controls. Exposure of interest was mean pain intensity reported during the time followed in routine rheumatology practice. Pain intensity was measured using a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100 and conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds of mortality per 5 unit increase in pain while adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 8019 patients. A total of 276 cases were identified and matched with 1187 controls. Higher mean pain intensity was associated with increased odds of mortality [odds ratio 1.06 (95% CI 1.02, 1.10)] in the crude model, but there was no association [odds ratio 0.99 (95% CI 0.95, 1.03)] when adjusting for additional confounders. Factors shown to increase the odds of mortality were recent glucocorticoid use, concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, cancer and cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that experienced pain in itself is not associated with premature mortality in patients with PsA. However, recent glucocorticoid use and concurrent comorbidities were.

Patient-reported outcome measures in systemic lupus erythematosus by a web-based application: A randomized, crossover, agreement study

OBJECTIVES

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but not widely used in clinical practice. However, interest in incorporating PROMs into the management of SLE is increasing as PROMs provide a unique insight into the patient's perception of lupus disease activity. The objective was to assess agreement in PROMs answered using a web app versus an outpatient touchscreen among patients with SLE.

METHODS

In a crossover RCT, SLE patients answered the following PROMs in a random order using the web app and the outpatient touchscreen: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ) Global Health, SLAQ Symptom, SLAQ Total, SLAQ Worsening, Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Fatigue VAS, Patient Global Health VAS, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and an Anchoring Question. Equivalence between the two device types was demonstrated if the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the difference in PROM scores was within the prespecified equivalence margin. Agreement between the two device types was assessed using mixed linear models.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients with SLE were included. Equivalence was demonstrated between the two device types for SLAQ Global Health with a difference of -0.21 (95% CI: -0.65 to 0.23). Moreover, equivalence was also found for HAQ-DI, Pain VAS, and Fatigue VAS whereas only comparability within the limits of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) was demonstrated for VAS Patient Global Health. Statistical comparability was demonstrated for SLAQ Total, SLAQ Worsening, PASS, and Anchoring Question (no predefined MCID/equivalence margins available). However, a statistically significant difference between device types was observed for the SLAQ Symptom of -0.56 (95% CI: -1.10 to -0.01). The difference was, however, very small when considering the scale range of 0-24; thus, it was not judged to be of clinical relevance. Preference for the web app was very high (91.2%).

CONCLUSION

For the first time ever, equivalence and comparability between two electronic device types for various PROMs were demonstrated among patients with SLE. Implementation of the device is expected to improve the management of SLE.

Intake of marine n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: protocol for a cohort study using data from the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort and Danish health registers

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory joint disease with multifactorial aetiology. Smoking is a well-established lifestyle risk factor, but diet may also have an impact on the risk of RA. Intake of the major marine n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in particular eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) have been hypothesised to lower the risk of RA due to their anti-inflammatory effects, although based on limited knowledge. Therefore, we aim to investigate the associations between dietary intake of EPA and DHA and the risk of incident RA.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A cohort study. The follow-up design will be based on data from the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort, which was established between 1993 and 1997. The participants will be followed through record linkage using nationwide registers including the Danish Civil Registration System, the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish National Prescription Registry using the unique Civil Personal Registration number. Time-to-event analyses will be conducted with RA as the outcome of interest. The participants will be followed from inclusion until date of RA diagnosis, death, emigration or end of follow-up. HRs with 95% CIs obtained using Cox proportional hazard regression models, with age as underlying time scale and adjustment for established and potential risk factors, will be used as measures of association.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the Data Protection Committee of Northern Jutland, Denmark (2019-87) and the North Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics (N-20190031). Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presentations at international conferences.

Deep Breathing Increases Heart Rate Variability in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been associated with an impaired function of the autonomic nervous system and reduced vagus nerve (VN) tone measured through lower heart rate variability (HRV). Targeting the VN through electrical stimulation has been proposed as a treatment strategy with promising results in patients with RA. Moreover, it has been suggested that the VN can be stimulated physiologically through deep breathing. In this study, the aim was to investigate if the VN can be stimulated through deep breathing in patients with RA and SLE, as measured by HRV.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with RA and SLE performed deep breathing exercises for 30 minutes in this explorative study. Before the breathing exercise, 2 electrocardiogram recordings were obtained to determine the patient's baseline HRV during rest. After the 30-minute breathing exercise, 5 minutes of electrocardiogram recordings were obtained to determine postintervention HRV and used as a measure of vagal activity.

RESULTS

No change was observed in the HRV between the 2 recordings prior the exercise, but the heart rate and HRV significantly decreased and increased, respectively, after the deep breathing exercise.

CONCLUSIONS

HRV can be modulated in patients with RA and SLE; this may have implications for future treatment with medications in conjunction with deep breathing. However, the biological and clinical effect of deep breathing must be investigated in future studies.

Are fatty acids associated with disease activity and biomarkers in patients with psoriatic arthritis? Data from a multicenter clinical trial

The pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) involves inflammation and bone and soft tissue turnover. Dietary fatty acids have previously been associated with pro-inflammatory effects induced by saturated fatty acids (SFA) and anti-inflammatory effects achieved by at least some polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). The aim of the study was to investigate the correlations between the content of fatty acids in granulocytes and clinical and biochemical markers of PsA. A total of 140 patients with PsA were included. Skin and joint disease activity were assessed. Fatty acid composition in granulocytes was determined by gas chromatography. Competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to assess bone and soft tissue turnover. The content of SFA, n-6 PUFA or n-3 PUFA in granulocytes was not associated with disease activity. Marine n-3 PUFA was significantly positively correlated with collagen degradation. In contrast, n-6 PUFA was significantly positively correlated with collagen formation and negatively correlated with collagen degradation. However, the correlations were all weak. No association was found between the content of fatty acids in granulocytes and disease activity in this population of patients with PsA. The correlation between fatty acids and biomarkers of bone and soft tissue turnover needs further investigation.

Characterization of apolipoprotein E-deficient rats as novel model for atherosclerosis imaging

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

The apolipoprotein E-deficient (apoE-/-) mouse is a well-established atherosclerotic model with impaired lipoprotein clearance and development of vessel plaques. However, the small size of the mouse limits its use as an animal model in longitudinal positron emission tomography (PET) imaging studies of atherosclerosis. Recently, apoE-/- rats have become available. This study addresses the suitability of the apoE-/- rat as model for atherosclerotic PET imaging.

Methods

Ten male apoE-/- rats and ten male control rats (apoE+/+) (age 10+/-1 weeks), each fed with a Western diet, were injected at baseline week 4, 12, 26 and 51, with 60 MBq of [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Plasma cholesterol, body weight and fat were measured. 3h after injection, a computed tomography (CT) and a 20-min PET scan were made. After the final scan, aortic tissue was collected for histological staining.

Results

Cholesterol levels started to increase after 4 weeks in the apoE-/- rats, whereas in the apoE+/+ rats levels stayed stable. Body weight and body fat increased more rapidly in the apoE-/- rats but were similar in both strains at the end of the study. SUVmean and max in the aortic arch and abdominal aorta were significantly higher (p &lt; 0.001) in apoE-/- versus apoE+/+ rats at weeks 12, 26 and 51. Oil red O staining showed lesions in 20.0 % of the surface of the aortic arch in the apoE-/- rats. Hardly no fatty streaks were detected in the apoE+/+ rats (2.29%). More histology data is being analyzed.

Conclusion

Plasma cholesterol levels were elevated in apoE-/- rats. PET imaging demonstrated differences in [18F]-FDG uptake in the aortic arch and abdominal aorta after 12, 26 and 51 weeks. Combined, these data demonstrate that apoE-/- rats represent a useful preclinical model for the non-invasive assessment of atherosclerosis in longitudinal studies.

Using a novel smartphone application for capturing of patient-reported outcome measures among patients with inflammatory arthritis:A randomized, crossover, agreement study

Objectives: In Denmark, patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) have completed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) via touchscreens in the outpatient clinic since 2006. However, current technology makes it possible for patients to use their own smartphone via an application (app) developed for the Danish Rheumatology Database (DANBIO). This study aims to evaluate the agreement of PROMs between the DANBIO app and outpatient touchscreen in patients with IA.Method: Patients with IA (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis) were enrolled in a randomized, crossover, agreement study. Participants answered PROMs through the two device types in a randomized order. Differences in PROM scores with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were evaluated for similarity according to prespecified equivalence margins.Results: The touchscreen invitation was accepted by 138 patients. Sixty patients (20 with each diagnosis) were included. The difference in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index between the two device types was -0.007 (95% CI -0.043 to 0.030); thus, equivalence was demonstrated. In addition, all other PROMs obtained with the two device types were equivalent, except for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), which was within the limits of minimally clinically important difference (MCID). In total, 78.3% preferred the DANBIO app.Conclusion: In patients with IA, equivalence was demonstrated between two device types for all PROMs except BASDAI; however, BASDAI was within the limits of the MCID. Implementation of the DANBIO app is expected to optimize outpatient visits, thereby improving healthcare for the individual patient and society.

POS0313 INCIDENCE AND PREVALENCE OF POLYAUTOIMMUNITY IN SEROPOSITIVE COMPARED WITH SERONEGATIVE PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A NATIONWIDE COHORT STUDY

Background:

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is categorized as seropositive or seronegative referring to the presence or absence of IgM rheumatoid factor (IgM-RF) and/ or anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA).

Patients with an autoimmune disease are more likely to develop additional autoimmune conditions than individuals without pre-existing autoimmune disease.

Objectives:

The aims of this study were to examine patterns of polyautoimmunity in seropositive compared with seronegative patients with recent-onset RA.

Methods:

The study was register-based and used the nationwide DANBIO register (identification of recent-onset (<1 year) seropositive, ICD-10 M05, and seronegative, M06, RA patients) linked to the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish National Prescription Registry to obtain information on additional autoimmune diseases (see Table 1 for autoimmune conditions).

Table 1.

Characteristics, prevalence, and incidence of polyautoimmunity in incident RA patients.

SeropositiveSeronegativeN79834534Age in years59.4 (48.6 to 69.1)63.0 (51.5 to 72.3)Women5476 (69 %)2856 (63 %)HAQ-DI0.857 (0.375 to 1.375)0.875 (0.375 to 1.375)DAS28-CRP4.3 (3.3 to 5.2)4.6 (3.6 to 5.5)CRP, mg/mL10 (4 to 23)10 (3 to 26)VAS physician, 0-100mm27 (15 to 45)30 (16 to 47)Treated with methotrexate86 %84 %-other csDMARD, %24 %24 %-Biological DMARD, %5 %6 %Smoking status:Current / previous / never / unknown, %13 / 11 / 17 / 59 %9 / 9 / 23 / 59 %Prevalence of polyautoimmunity / diabetes mellitus type 1 / autoimmune thyroid disease / inflammatory bowel disease549 (10.6 %) / 1.4 % / 6.7 % / 1.4 %349 (12.8 %) / 1.5 % / 7.8 % / 1.5 %Age and sex adjusted odds ratio0.79 (0.71 to 0.89)1 (ref.)Incident cases of polyautoimmunity373 (4.7 %)242 (5.3 %)Adjusted hazard ratio0.86 (0.71 to 1.05)1 (ref.)

Continuous variables shown as median with interquartile ranges. Autoimmune conditions included:

autoimmune thyroid disease (redeemed prescriptions of ATC=H03A); diabetes mellitus type 1 (ICD-10 diagnosis E10 combined with redeemed prescriptions of insulin, ATC=A10A); pernicious anaemia (D51.0); autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (D59.1); idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (D69.3); Autoimmune adrenalitis (E27.1B); multiple sclerosis (G35); neuromyelitis optica (G36.0); Guillain-Barré syndrome (G61.0); myasthenia gravis (G70); inflammatory bowel disease (K50-1); primary biliary cirrhosis (K74.3); primary sclerosing cholangitis (K83.0); autoimmune hepatitis (K75.4); celiac disease (K90.0); pemphigus vulgaris (L10.0); bullous pemphigoid (L12.0); dermatitis herpetiformis (L13.0); alopecia areata (L63); vitiligo (L80); lichen sclerosis (L90.0); chronic interstitial cystitis (N30.1).

Using age and sex adjusted logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio (OR) of prevalent polyautoimmunity in seropositive compared with seronegative patients at the time of RA diagnosis was calculated.

To estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for developing yet another autoimmune disease in the 5 years after RA diagnosis, adjusted cause-specific Cox regression models were performed. Several sensitivity analyses were carried out including alternative exposure and outcome definitions.

Results:

In total, 12,517 patients with recent-onset RA were included. The groups were similar in terms of disease characteristics and DMARD treatment, but seropositive patients were younger and included more women, see Table 1. Patients with seropositive RA had an OR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.89) for baseline presence of polyautoimmunity compared with seronegative patients, whereas the 5-year HR was 0.86 (95% CI 0.71-1.05) for incident polyautoimmunity. The results remained similar in all sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion:

Patients with seropositive RA had a slightly lower prevalence and incidence of polyautoimmunity compared to seropositive patients. The results were somewhat surprising, yet very robust, and thus raises the question if seronegative RA is in fact “more autoimmune” despite the absence of (identified) autoantibodies.

Acknowledgements:

We acknowledge all patients and all Danish departments of rheumatology contributing to the DANBIO registry.

Disclosure of Interests:

Amalie Hagelskjær: None declared, René Cordtz: None declared, Sofie Bliddal: None declared, Anders Sandermann Mortensen: None declared, Salome Kristensen: None declared, Claus Henrik Nielsen: None declared, Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen: None declared, Christian Torp-Pedersen: None declared, Lene Dreyer Grant/research support from: Grants from BMS, Galderma, and Eli Lilly

POS0025 INCIDENCE RATES AND POINT PREVALENCE OF SEROPOSITIVE AND SERONEGATIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN DENMARK: A NATIONWIDE REGISTER-BASED STUDY FROM 1998 TO 2018 USING FOUR DIFFERENT CASE CRITERIA

Background:

Few previous studies have investigated the incidence rate (IR) and point prevalence (PP) of seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and further, the estimates remain unknown in the Danish population.

Objectives:

To investigate the IR and PP of seropositive and seronegative RA in the adult Danish population from 1998 to 2018 using four register-based case definitions of RA.

Methods:

Nationwide register-based cohort study. Using the Danish administrative registers, patients with RA between 1998 and end of 2018 were identified. ICD-10 codes for RA were identified in the Danish National Patient Registry and information on DMARD prescriptions were obtained through the Danish National Prescription Registry using ATC codes. The used case definitions were1: Criteria A, first time M05/M06 RA diagnosis and redemption of a DMARD in the following year; Criteria B, two RA diagnoses within 90 days of each other, originating from department of rheumatology or general internal medicine, where the latest registered M05/M06 diagnosis defined the serologic status; Criteria C, a M05/M06 diagnosis recorded at any time preceded or followed by redemption of a DMARD prescription within one year, where the M05/M06 diagnosis recorded determined the serologic status; Criteria D, as Criteria A, but with the additional requirements that cases had no registration for other selected inflammatory diseases.

In calculation of IRs the total Danish population from 1998 to 2018 was used as reference population for standardisation. The PP was calculated for years 2000, 2009, 2011 and 2018.

Results:

From 1998 to 2018 the overall IR was 18.0 (95%CI 17.7 to 18.3) per 100,000 person years (PY) for seropositive RA and 16.7 (95%CI 16.4 to 16.9) per 100,000 PY for seronegative RA using Criteria A. A higher IR for seropositive RA than for seronegative RA was found regardless of the case criteria used. Figure 1 shows the temporal IRs of seropositive and seronegative RA.

Regardless of case criteria used, the PP increased from 2000 to 2018 for both seropositive and seronegative RA, and the estimates were higher for seropositive RA than for seronegative RA (Table 1).

Table 1.

Point prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in Denmark in year 2000, 2009, 2011 and 2018 using four different case definitions

2000200920112018SeropositiveSeronegativeSeropositiveSeronegativeSeropositiveSeronegativeSeropositiveSeronegativeCriteria AN3029274174747127871281211243711662Population3964040416629842028914269677PP, % (95%CI)0.08 (0.08 to 0.08)0.07 (0.07 to 0.07)0.18 (0.18 to 0.19)0.17 (0.17 to 0.18)0.21 (0.20 to 0.21)0.19 (0.19 to 0.20)0.27 (0.27 to 0.28)0.26 (0.25 to 0.26)Criteria BN7507489311565903312710100111633413340PP, % (95%CI)0.20 (0.19 to 0.20)0.13 (0.12 to 0.13)0.28 (0.28 to 0.29)0.22 (0.21 to 0.22)0.30 (0.30 to 0.31)0.24 (0.23 to 0.24)0.36 (0.35 to 0.36)0.29 (0.29 to 0.30)Criteria CN6701457011174912512417101491588113712PP, % (95%CI)0.18 (0.17 to 0.18)0.12 (0.12 to 0.12)0.27 (0.27 to 0.28)0.22 (0.22 to 0.23)0.29 (0.29 to 0.30)0.24 (0.24 to 0.25)0.35 (0.34 to 0.35)0.30 (0.30 to 0.31)Criteria DN272423906612598476956759108309452PP, % (95%CI)0.07 (0.07 to 0.07)0.06 (0.06 to 0.07)0.16 (0.16 to 0.16)0.15 (0.14 to 0.15)0.18 (0.18 to 0.19)0.16 (0.16 to 0.17)0.24 (0.23 to 0.24)0.21 (0.20 to 0.21)

PP = Point prevalence

Conclusion:

In Denmark, the IR and PP estimates were higher for seropositive compared to seronegative RA during the study period. However, when applying stricter case criteria for RA (Criteria A and D) the differences in IR and PP estimates were smaller, than when using less strict criteria (Criteria B and C). The findings of such small differences between seropositive and seronegative IRs warrant further investigation.

References:

[1]Soussi BG et al. Incidence and prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in Denmark: a nationwide population based study investigating the effect of four different case definitions [abstract]. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(supplement 1):46

Acknowledgements:

The authors will like to thank The Danish Rheumatism Association for supporting this work.

Disclosure of Interests:

Bolette Gylden Soussi: None declared, René Lindholm Cordtz: None declared, Salome Kristensen: None declared, Christian Sørensen Bork: None declared, Jeppe Christensen: None declared, Erik Berg Schmidt: None declared, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra Grant/research support from: Grants from AMGEN, UCB Biopharma and Les Laboratoires Servier; and Janssen, on behalf of IMI-funded EHDEN and EMIF consortiums, and Synapse Management Partners have supported training programmes organised by DPA’s department and open for external participants, Lene Dreyer Grant/research support from: Grants from BMS, Galderma and Eli Lilly.