1
|
Ørnbjerg LM, Brahe CH, Linde L, Jacobsson L, Nissen MJ, Kristianslund EK, Santos MJ, Nordström D, Rotar Z, Gudbjornsson B, Onen F, Codreanu C, Lindström U, Möller B, Kvien TK, Barcelos A, Eklund KK, Tomšič M, Love TJ, Can G, Ionescu R, Loft AG, Mann H, Pavelka K, van de Sande M, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Suarez MP, Sánchez-Piedra C, Macfarlane GJ, Iannone F, Michelsen B, Hyldstrup LH, Krogh NS, Østergaard M, Hetland ML. Drug effectiveness of 2nd and 3rd TNF inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis - relationship with the reason for withdrawal from the previous treatment. Joint Bone Spine 2024; 91:105729. [PMID: 38582359 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate real-world retention and remission rates in PsA patients initiating a 2nd or 3rd TNFi and the association with reason for discontinuation from the previous TNFi-treatment. METHODS Prospectively collected routine care data from 12 European registries were pooled. Retention rates (Kaplan-Meier estimation) and crude/LUNDEX-adjusted rates of Disease Activity Score 28 and Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAS28 and DAPSA28) remission were calculated and compared with adjusted Cox regression analyses and Chi-squared test, respectively). RESULTS We included 5233 (2nd TNFi) and 1906 (3rd TNFi) patients. Twelve-month retention rates for the 2nd and 3rd TNFi were 68% (95%CI: 67-70%) and 66% (64-68%), respectively. Patients who stopped the previous TNFi due to AE/LOE had 12-month retention rates of 66%/65% (2nd TNFi), and 65%/63% (3rd TNFi), respectively. Patients who stopped the previous TNFi due to LOE after less vs more than 24 weeks had 12-month retention rates of 54%/69% (2nd TNFi), and 58%/65% (3rd TNFi). Six-month crude/LUNDEX-adjusted DAS28 remission rates were 48%/35% and 38%/27%, and DAPSA28 remission rates were 19%/14% and 14%/10%, for the 2nd and 3rd TNFi. CONCLUSION Two-thirds of patients remained on TNFi at 12months for both the 2nd and 3rd TNFi, while one-third and one-quarter of patients were in DAS28 remission after 6months on the 2nd and 3rd TNFi. While drug effectiveness was similar in patients who stopped the previous TNFi due to AE compared to overall LOE, drug effectiveness was better in patients who had stopped the previous TNF due to secondary LOE compared to primary LOE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
| | - Cecilie Heegaard Brahe
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Louise Linde
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Lennart Jacobsson
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Michael J Nissen
- Department of Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Eirik Klami Kristianslund
- Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maria José Santos
- Reuma.pt registry; Department of Rheumatology-Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Dan Nordström
- ROB-FIN Registry, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ziga Rotar
- biorx.si and the Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Bjorn Gudbjornsson
- Centre for Rheumatology Research (ICEBIO), University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Fatos Onen
- TURKBIO Registry and Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Catalin Codreanu
- Center of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ulf Lindström
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Burkhard Möller
- Leitender Arzt der Universitätsklinik für Rheumatologie, Immunologie und Allergologie Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tore K Kvien
- Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anabela Barcelos
- Reuma.pt registry, Rheumatology Department - Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga, Aveiro and Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Kari K Eklund
- Inflammation Center, Department of Rheumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Matija Tomšič
- biorx.si and the Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Thorvardur Jon Love
- University of Iceland, Faculty of Medicine, and Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Gercek Can
- TURKBIO Registry and Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ruxandra Ionescu
- Center of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Herman Mann
- Institute of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Karel Pavelka
- Institute of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marleen van de Sande
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Rheumatology & immunology Center (ARC), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Manuel Pombo Suarez
- Rheumatology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Santiago, Spain
| | | | - Gary J Macfarlane
- Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health (Epidemiology Group) University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Florenzo Iannone
- GISEA registry, Rheumatology Unit-DETO, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Brigitte Michelsen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Research Unit, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristianssand, Norway
| | - Lise Hejl Hyldstrup
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Møller-Bisgaard S, Hørslev-Petersen K, Ørnbjerg LM, Ejbjerg B, Hetland ML, Møller JM, Nielsen SM, Glinatsi D, Boesen M, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Madsen OR, Jensen B, Villadsen JA, Hauge EM, Hendricks O, Lindegaard H, Krogh NS, Jurik AG, Thomsen H, Christensen R, Østergaard M. Long-term efficacy of a 2-year MRI treat-to-target strategy on disease activity and radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission: 5-year follow-up of the IMAGINE-RA randomised trial. RMD Open 2024; 10:e003945. [PMID: 38490697 PMCID: PMC10946351 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether a 2-year MRI treat-to-target strategy targeting the absence of osteitis combined with clinical remission, compared with a conventional treat-to-target strategy targeting clinical remission only (IMAGINE-rheumatoid arthritis (RA) trial) improves clinical and radiographic outcomes over 5 years in patients with RA in clinical remission. METHODS IMAGINE-more was an observational extension study of the original 2-year IMAGINE-RA randomised trial (NCT01656278). Clinical examinations and radiographs (hands and feet) were obtained yearly. Prespecified coprimary outcomes at year 5 were Disease Activity Score in 28 joints C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) remission rate (DAS28-CRP<2.6) and no radiographic progression (van der Heijde-modified Sharp score (vdHSS) ≤0) from baseline. Secondary outcomes included 5-year changes in radiographic, MRI and clinical measures of disease activity and physical function. RESULTS In total 131 patients, 86 women (67%), mean age 61.2, disease duration 9.5 years, median baseline DAS28-CRP 1.9 (IQR 1.6-2.2) and vdHSS 16.0 (IQR 7.0-36.0) were included in the study; 59 (59%) patients from the original MRI treat-to-target group and 72 (72%) from the conventional group. At year 5, 47 patients (80%) in the MRI treat-to-target group vs 54 patients (75%) in the conventional treat-to-target group were in DAS28-CRP remission (OR 2.00 (95% CI 0.76 to 5.28); p=0.16) while 14 patients (24%) vs 19 patients (26%) had no radiographic progression (OR 0.70, (95% CI 0.28 to 1.71); p=0.43). CONCLUSION A 2-year combined MRI and clinical treat-to-target strategy, compared with a conventional clinical treat-to-target strategy alone, had no effect on the long-term probability of achieving DAS28-CRP remission and of avoiding radiographic progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Signe Møller-Bisgaard
- Department of Rheumatology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Kim Hørslev-Petersen
- Department of Rheumatology, Sønderborg Sygehus, Sønderborg, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Bo Ejbjerg
- Department of Rheumatology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Sabrina Mai Nielsen
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Daniel Glinatsi
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Skaraborg Hospital Skövde, Skövde, Sweden
| | - Mikael Boesen
- Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristian Stengaard-Pedersen
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ole Rintek Madsen
- Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Bente Jensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Frederiksberg University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | | | - Ellen Margrethe Hauge
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Oliver Hendricks
- Department of Rheumatology, Sønderborg Sygehus, Sønderborg, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Hanne Lindegaard
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Anne Grethe Jurik
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Henrik Thomsen
- Department of Radiology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Robin Christensen
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Williams J, Verstappen SMM, Krogh NS, Dixon WG, Chinoy H, Oldroyd AGS. Remotely collected patient-reported data characterises the impact of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy flares upon work productivity. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023:kead692. [PMID: 38141204 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Williams
- Post Graduate Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - William G Dixon
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance, Manchester Academic Health Science Center, Salford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Hector Chinoy
- Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance, Manchester Academic Health Science Center, Salford, UK
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Alexander G S Oldroyd
- National Institute for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wetterslev M, Georgiadis S, Nysom Christiansen S, Pedersen SJ, Juul Sørensen I, Lund Hetland M, Duer A, Boesen M, Gosvig KK, Møller JM, Bakkegaard M, Heegaard Brahe C, Krogh NS, Jensen B, Madsen OR, Christensen J, Hansen A, Nørregaard J, Røgind H, Østergaard M. Occurrence and Prediction of Flare After Tapering of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis. J Rheumatol 2023:jrheum.2023-0495. [PMID: 37839816 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in clinical remission tapered tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapy according to a clinical guideline. Over a 2-year follow-up period, we aimed to investigate flare frequency, dose at which flare occurred, type of flare, and predictors thereof. METHODS Patients in clinical remission (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] < 40, physician global score < 40, and without disease activity the previous year) tapered TNFi to two-thirds the standard dose at baseline, half at week 16, one-third at week 32, and discontinued at week 48. Flares were defined as BASDAI flare (BASDAI ≥ 40 and change ≥ 20 since inclusion), and/or clinical flare (development of inflammatory back pain, musculoskeletal or extraarticular manifestations, and/or Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS] ≥ 0.9), and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) flare (≥ 2 new or worsened inflammatory lesions). RESULTS Of 108 patients, 106 (99%) flared before 2-year follow-up: 29 patients (27%) at two-thirds standard dose, 21 (20%) at half dose, 29 (27%) at one-third dose, and 27 (25%) after discontinuation. Regarding type of flare, 105 (99%) had clinical flares, 25 (24%) had BASDAI flares, and 23 (29% of patients with MRI at flare available) had MRI flares. Forty-one patients (41%) fulfilled the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) definition of clinically important worsening (≥ 0.9 increase since baseline). Higher baseline physician global score was an independent predictor of flare after tapering to two-thirds (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04-1.41, P = 0.01). Changes in clinical and/or imaging variables in the 16 weeks prior to tapering did not predict flare. CONCLUSION Almost all (99%) patients with axSpA in clinical remission experienced flare during tapering to discontinuation, but in over half of these patients, flare did not occur before receiving one-third dose or less. Higher physician global score was an independent predictor of flare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Wetterslev
- M. Wetterslev, MD, PhD, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
| | - Stylianos Georgiadis
- S. Georgiadis, PhD, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
| | - Sara Nysom Christiansen
- S. Nysom Christiansen, MD, PhD, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
| | - Susanne Juhl Pedersen
- S. Juhl Pedersen, MD, PhD, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
| | - Inge Juul Sørensen
- I. Juul Sørensen, MD, PhD, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- M. Lund Hetland, MD, PhD, DMSc, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, and The DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
| | - Anne Duer
- A. Duer, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Copenhagen
| | - Mikael Boesen
- M. Boesen, MD, PhD, DMSc, Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen
| | - Kasper Kjærulf Gosvig
- K.K. Gosvig, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen
| | | | - Mads Bakkegaard
- M. Bakkegaard, MD, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
| | - Cecilie Heegaard Brahe
- C. Heegaard Brahe, MD, PhD, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen
| | | | - Bente Jensen
- B. Jensen, MD, PhD, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen
| | - Ole Rintek Madsen
- O.R. Madsen, MD, PhD,Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Herlev, and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen
| | - Jan Christensen
- J. Christensen, MD, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen
| | - Annette Hansen
- A. Hansen, MD, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Herlev, and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen
| | - Jesper Nørregaard
- J. Nørregaard, MD, PhD, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
| | - Henrik Røgind
- H. Røgind, MD, PhD, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- M. Østergaard, MD, PhD, DMSc, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Linde L, Ørnbjerg LM, Brahe CH, Wallman JK, Di Giuseppe D, Závada J, Castrejon I, Díaz-Gonzalez F, Rotar Z, Tomšič M, Glintborg B, Gudbjornsson B, Geirsson AJ, Michelsen B, Kristianslund EK, Santos MJ, Barcelos A, Nordström D, Eklund KK, Ciurea A, Nissen M, Akar S, Hyldstrup LH, Krogh NS, Hetland ML, Østergaard M. Second and third TNF inhibitors in European patients with axial spondyloarthritis: Effectiveness and impact of the reason for switching. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023:kead494. [PMID: 37738257 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate real-world effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and the association with 1) treatment line (second and third TNFi-series) and 2) reason for withdrawal from the preceding TNFi (lack of efficacy (LOE) versus adverse events (AE)). METHODS Prospectively collected routine care data from 12 European registries were pooled. Rates for 12-month drug retention and 6-month remission (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score C-reactive protein inactive disease (ASDAS-ID)) were assessed in second and third TNFi-series and stratified by withdrawal reason. RESULTS We included 8254 s and 2939 third TNFi-series; 12-month drug retention rates were similar (71%). Six-month ASDAS-ID rates were higher for the second (23%) than third TNFi (16%). Twelve-month drug retention rates for patients withdrawing from the preceding TNFi due to AE versus LOE were similar for the second (68% and 67%) and third TNFi (both 68%), while for the second TNFi, rates were lower in primary than secondary non-responders (LOE < 26 versus ≥26 weeks) (58% versus 71%, p< 0.001). Six-month ASDAS-ID rates for the second TNFi were higher if the withdrawal reason was AE (27%) versus LOE (17%), p< 0.001, while similar for the third TNFi (19% versus 13%, p= 0.20). CONCLUSION A similar proportion of axSpA patients remained on a second and third TNFi after one year, but with low remission rates for the third TNFi. Remission rates on the second TNFi (but not the third) were higher if the withdrawal reason from the preceding TNFi was AE versus LOE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Linde
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center for Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center for Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Cecilie Heegaard Brahe
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center for Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Johan Karlsson Wallman
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Daniela Di Giuseppe
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jakub Závada
- Institute of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology, 1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Isabel Castrejon
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón and Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Federico Díaz-Gonzalez
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dermatology and Psychiatry, Universidad de La Laguna and Rheumatology Service, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain
| | - Ziga Rotar
- Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Matija Tomšič
- Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Bente Glintborg
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center for Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bjorn Gudbjornsson
- Centre for Rheumatology Research (ICEBIO), Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | - Brigitte Michelsen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center for Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Research Unit, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Eirik Klami Kristianslund
- Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maria José Santos
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada and Instituto Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Reuma.pt registry
| | - Anabela Barcelos
- Department of Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga, Aveiro and Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Lisbon, Portugal: Reuma.pt registry
| | - Dan Nordström
- Departments of Medicine and Rheumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kari K Eklund
- Inflammation Center, Department of Rheumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Adrian Ciurea
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Nissen
- Department of Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Servet Akar
- School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Lise Hejl Hyldstrup
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center for Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center for Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center for Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hum RM, Lilleker JB, Lamb JA, Oldroyd AGS, Wang G, Wedderburn LR, Diederichsen LP, Schmidt J, Danieli MG, Oakley P, Griger Z, Phuong TNT, Kodishala C, Vazquez-Del Mercado M, Andersson H, De Paepe B, De Bleecker JL, Maurer B, McCann L, Pipitone N, McHugh N, New RP, Ollier WE, Krogh NS, Vencovsky J, Lundberg IE, Chinoy H. Comparison of clinical features between patients with anti-synthetase syndrome and dermatomyositis: Results from the MYONET registry. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023:kead481. [PMID: 37698987 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare clinical characteristics, including the frequency of cutaneous, extramuscular manifestations, and malignancy, between adults with anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS) and dermatomyositis (DM). METHODS Using data regarding adults from the MYONET registry, a cohort of DM patients with anti-Mi2/-TIF1ɣ/-NXP2/-SAE/-MDA5 autoantibodies, and a cohort of ASyS patients with anti-tRNA synthetase autoantibodies (anti-Jo1/-PL7/-PL12/-OJ/-EJ/-Zo/-KS) were identified. Patients with DM sine dermatitis or with discordant dual autoantibody specificities were excluded. Sub-cohorts of patients with ASyS with or without skin involvement were defined based on presence of DM-type rashes (heliotrope rash, Gottron's papules/sign, violaceous rash, shawl sign, V sign, erythroderma, and/or periorbital rash). RESULTS In total 1,054 patients were included (DM, n = 405; ASyS, n = 649). In ASyS cohort, 31% (n = 203) had DM-type skin involvement (ASyS-DMskin). A higher frequency of extramuscular manifestations, including Mechanic's hands, Raynaud's phenomenon, arthritis, interstitial lung disease, and cardiac involvement differentiated ASyS-DMskin from DM (all p< 0.001), whereas higher frequency of any of four DM-type rashes: heliotrope rash (n = 248, 61% vs n = 90, 44%), violaceous rash (n = 166, 41% vs n = 57, 9%), V sign (n = 124, 31% vs n = 28, 4%), and shawl sign (n = 133, 33% vs n = 18, 3%) differentiated DM from ASyS-DMskin (all p< 0.005). Cancer-associated myositis (CAM) was more frequent in DM (n = 67, 17%) compared with ASyS (n = 21, 3%) and ASyS-DMskin (n = 7, 3%) cohorts (both p< 0.001). CONCLUSION DM-type rashes are frequent in patients with ASyS; however, distinct clinical manifestations differentiate these patients from classical DM. Skin involvement in ASyS does not necessitate increased malignancy surveillance. These findings will inform future ASyS classification criteria and patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Malcolm Hum
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal & Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, Manchester, UK
- The University of Manchester, National Institute for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - James B Lilleker
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal & Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, Manchester, UK
| | - Janine A Lamb
- The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Epidemiology and Public Health Group, Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Alexander G S Oldroyd
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal & Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, Manchester, UK
- The University of Manchester, National Institute for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Guochun Wang
- Department of Rheumatology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, Beijing, CN
| | - Lucy R Wedderburn
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, London, London, UK
| | - Louise P Diederichsen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kobenhavn, DK
| | - Jens Schmidt
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Gottingen, Niedersachsen, DE
| | - Maria Giovanna Danieli
- Clinica Medica, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Molecolari, Universita Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, IT
| | | | - Zoltan Griger
- Department of Immunology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hajdú-Bihar, HU
| | | | - Chanakya Kodishala
- Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, St John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN
- Department of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Monica Vazquez-Del Mercado
- Division de Medicina Interna, Servicio de Reumatologia, Hospital Civil Dr. Juan I. Menchaca, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, MX
| | | | - Boel De Paepe
- Department of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Ghent, BE
| | | | - Britta Maurer
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Bern, CH
| | - Liza McCann
- Department of Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK
| | - Nicolo Pipitone
- Department of Rheumatology, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, IT, Emilia-Romagna
| | - Neil McHugh
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, UK
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Robert Paul New
- MRC/ARUK Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - William E Ollier
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Jiri Vencovsky
- Institute of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology, Charles University, Praha, Praha, CZ
| | - Ingrid E Lundberg
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SE
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dermatology, and Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, SE
| | - Hector Chinoy
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal & Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Westerlind H, Glintborg B, Hammer HB, Saevarsdottir S, Krogh NS, Hetland ML, Hauge EM, Martinez Tejada I, Sexton J, Askling J. Remission, response, retention and persistence to treatment with disease-modifying agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a study of harmonised Swedish, Danish and Norwegian cohorts. RMD Open 2023; 9:e003027. [PMID: 37673441 PMCID: PMC10496677 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Precision medicine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) requires a good understanding of treatment outcomes and often collaborative efforts that call for data harmonisation. We aimed to describe how harmonisation across study cohorts can be achieved and investigate how the observed proportions reaching remission vary across remission criteria, study types, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and countries, and how they relate to other treatment outcomes. METHODS We used data from eight existing large-scale, clinical RA registers and a pragmatic trial from Sweden, Denmark and Norway. In these, we defined three types of treatment cohorts; methotrexate monotherapy (as first DMARD), tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) (as first biological DMARD) and rituximab. We developed a harmonised study protocol defining time points during 36 months of follow-up, collected clinical visit data on treatment response, retention, persistence and six alternative definitions of remission, and investigated how these outcomes differed within and between cohorts, by treatment. RESULTS Cohort sizes ranged from ~50 to 22 000 patients with RA. The proportions reaching each outcome varied across outcome metric, but with small to modest variations within and between cohorts, countries and treatment. Retention and persistence rates were high (>50% at 1 year), yet <33% of patients starting methotrexate or TNFi, and only 10% starting rituximab, remained on drug without other DMARDs added and achieved American Congress of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology or Simplified Disease Activity Index remission at 1 year. CONCLUSION Harmonisation of data from different RA data sources can be achieved without compromising internal validity or generalisability. The low proportions reaching remission, point to an unmet need for treatment optimisation in RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helga Westerlind
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bente Glintborg
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Hilde Berner Hammer
- Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Saedis Saevarsdottir
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Niels Steen Krogh
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Ellen-Margrethe Hauge
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Isabel Martinez Tejada
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Joseph Sexton
- Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Johan Askling
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vittrup I, Krogh NS, Larsen HHP, Elberling J, Skov L, Ibler KS, Jemec GBE, Mortz CG, Bach RO, Bindslev-Jensen C, Dalager MG, Egeberg A, Agner T, Deleuran M, Vestergaard C, Thyssen JP. A nationwide 104 weeks real-world study of dupilumab in adults with atopic dermatitis: Ineffectiveness in head-and-neck dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2023; 37:1046-1055. [PMID: 36606551 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of new systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) after approval is important. There are few published data exceeding 52-week therapy with dupilumab. OBJECTIVES To examine the safety, effectiveness and drug survival of dupilumab in a Danish nationwide cohort with moderate-to-severe AD up to 104 weeks exposure. METHODS We included 347 adult patients with AD who were treated with dupilumab and registered in the SCRATCH registry during 2017-2022. RESULTS At all visits, we observed improvement in AD severity measured by Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) [median (IQR)]. EASI score at baseline was 18.0 (10.6-25.2), at week 4: 6.5 (3.5-11.6), at week 16: 3.7 (1.2-6.2), at week 52: 2.0 (0.8-3.6), at week 104: 1.7 (0.8-3.8). While drug survival was high (week 52: 90%; week 104: 86%), AD in the head-and-neck area remained present in most patients at high levels; proportion with head-and-neck AD at baseline was 76% and 68% at week 104. 35% of patients reported any AE. Conjunctivitis was the most frequent (25% of all patients) and median time to first registration of conjunctivitis was 201 days. CONCLUSIONS While 2-year drug survival was 86%, dupilumab was unable to effectively treat AD in the head-and-neck area, and conjunctivitis was found in 25% of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Vittrup
- Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Henrik Hedegaard Pliess Larsen
- Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jesper Elberling
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lone Skov
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristina Sophie Ibler
- Department of Dermatology, Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Gregor B E Jemec
- Department of Dermatology, Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Charlotte G Mortz
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Rasmus Overgaard Bach
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | - Alexander Egeberg
- Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tove Agner
- Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mette Deleuran
- Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen
- Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Terslev L, Ostergaard M, Georgiadis S, Brahe CH, Ellegaard K, Dohn UM, Fana V, Møller T, Juul L, Huynh TK, Krabbe S, Ornbjerg LM, Glinatsi D, Røgind H, Hansen A, Nørregaard J, Jacobsen S, Jensen DV, Manilo N, Asmussen K, Boesen M, Rastiemadabadi Z, Morsel-Carlsen L, Møller JM, Krogh NS, Hetland ML. Flare during tapering of biological DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine care: characteristics and predictors. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002796. [PMID: 36549857 PMCID: PMC9791469 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify predictors of flare in a 2-year follow-up study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in sustained clinical remission tapering towards withdrawal of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). METHODS Sustained clinical remission was defined as Disease Activity Score for 28 joints (DAS28)-C reactive protein (CRP) ≤2.6 without radiographic progression for >1 year. bDMARDs were tapered according to a mandatory clinical guideline to two-thirds of standard dose at baseline, half of dose at week 16 and discontinuation at week 32. Prospective assessments for 2 years included clinical evaluation, conventional radiography, ultrasound and MRI for signs of inflammation and bone changes. Flare was defined as DAS28-CRP ≥2.6 with ∆DAS28-CRP ≥1.2 from baseline. Baseline predictors of flare were assessed by logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Of 142 included patients, 121 (85%) flared during follow-up of which 86% regained remission within 24 weeks after flare. Patients that flared were more often rheumatoid factor positive, had tried more bDMARDs and had higher baseline ultrasound synovitis sum scores than those not flaring. For patients on standard dose, predictors of flare within 16 weeks after reduction to two-thirds of standard dose were baseline MRI-osteitis (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.33; p=0.014), gender (female) (OR 6.71; 95% CI 1.68 to 46.12; p=0.005) and disease duration (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.11; p=0.020). Baseline predictors for flare within 2 years were ultrasound grey scale synovitis sum score (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.44; p=0.020) and number of previous bDMARDs (OR 4.07; 95% CI 1.35 to 24.72; p=0.007). CONCLUSION The majority of real-world patients with RA tapering bDMARDs flared during tapering, with the majority regaining remission after stepwise dose increase. Demographic and imaging parameters (MR-osteitis/ultrasound greyscale synovitis) were independent predictors of immediate flare and flare overall and may be of importance for clinical decision-making in patients eligible for tapering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Terslev
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stylianos Georgiadis
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Cecilie Heegaard Brahe
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Karen Ellegaard
- The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg og Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - UM Dohn
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Viktoria Fana
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Torsten Møller
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Lars Juul
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Tuan Khai Huynh
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark,Holte Rheumatology Clinic, Capital Region, Holte, Denmark
| | - Simon Krabbe
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - L M Ornbjerg
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Daniel Glinatsi
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark,Department of Rheumatology, Skaraborg Hospital Skövde, Skovde, Sweden
| | - Henrik Røgind
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Annette Hansen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Jesper Nørregaard
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Søren Jacobsen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dorte V Jensen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark,Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Danbio Registry, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Natalia Manilo
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Karsten Asmussen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Mikael Boesen
- Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Lone Morsel-Carlsen
- Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nabi H, Hendricks O, Jensen DV, Loft AG, Pedersen JK, Just SA, Danebod K, Munk HL, Kristensen S, Manilo N, Colic A, Linauskas A, Thygesen PH, Christensen LB, Kalisz MH, Lomborg N, Chrysidis S, Raun JL, Andersen M, Mehnert F, Krogh NS, Hetland ML, Glintborg B. Infliximab biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease: clinical outcomes in real-world patients from the DANBIO registry. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002560. [PMID: 36418087 PMCID: PMC9685195 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Successful uptake of biosimilars in rheumatology is limited by lack of real-world evidence regarding effectiveness of biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching. We investigated infliximab biosimilars CT-P13-to-GP1111 switching among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA). Methods Observational cohort study from the DANBIO registry. Patients were classified as originator-naïve or originator-experienced. Retention rates of 1-year GP1111 treatment were explored (Kaplan-Meier). We identified baseline factors (at the time of switch) associated with withdrawal of GP1111 (multivariable Cox-regression analyses with HRs including originator treatment history). Changes in subjective and objective measures of disease activity 4 months before and after the switch were assessed in individual patients. Results Of 1605 patients (685 RA, 314 PsA and 606 AxSpA, median disease duration was 9 years, 37% in Clinical Disease Activity Index/Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score remission), 1171 were originator-naïve. Retention rates at 1-year were 83% (95% CI: 81% to 85%) and 92% (95% CI: 90% to 95%) for the originator-naïve and originator-experienced, respectively. GP1111 retention rates were higher in originator-experienced compared to originator-naïve with RA (HR=0.4 (95% CI: 0.2 to 0.7)) and PsA (HR=0.2 (95% CI: 0.1 to 0.8)), but not significantly for AxSpA: HR=0.6 (95% CI: 0.3 to 1.2). Lower disease activity was associated with higher retention. Changes in disease activity preswitch and postswitch were close to zero. Conclusion This real-world observational study of more than 1600 patients with inflammatory arthritis showed high 1-year retention following a nationwide infliximab biosimilar-to-biosimilar switch. Retention was higher in originator-experienced and in patients with low disease activity, suggesting outcomes to be affected by patient-related rather than drug-related factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hafsah Nabi
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Oliver Hendricks
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Disease, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Syddanmark, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Dorte Vendelbo Jensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rønne Hospital, Rønne, Denmark
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jens Kristian Pedersen
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine M, Svendborg Hospital, Svendborg, Syddanmark, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Søren Andreas Just
- Department of Rheumatology, Svendborg Hospital, Svendborg, Syddanmark, Denmark
| | - Kamilla Danebod
- Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Heidi Lausten Munk
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Salome Kristensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Natalia Manilo
- Department of Rheumatology, Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ada Colic
- Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Asta Linauskas
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg Universitet, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Louise Brot Christensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Maren Høgberget Kalisz
- Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Niels Lomborg
- Department of Rheumatology, Vejle Hospital Lillebælt, Vejle, Denmark
| | | | | | - Marlene Andersen
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjorring, Nordjylland, Denmark
| | - Frank Mehnert
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Merete Lund Hetland
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bente Glintborg
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Glintborg B, Jensen DV, Terslev L, Hendricks O, Østergaard M, Horskjær Rasmussen S, Jensen MP, Adelsten T, Colic A, Danebod K, Kildemand M, Loft AG, Munk HL, Pedersen JK, Østgård RD, Møller Sørensen C, Krogh NS, Agerbo J, Ziegler C, Hetland ML. Nationwide, large-scale implementation of an online system for remote entry of patient-reported outcomes in rheumatology: characteristics of users and non-users and time to first entry. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002549. [PMID: 36418086 PMCID: PMC9685239 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims In May 2020, a nationwide, web-based system for remote entry of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in inflammatory rheumatic diseases was launched and implemented in routine care (DANBIO-from-home). After 1.5 years of use, we explored clinical characteristics of patients who did versus did not use the system, and the time to first entry of PROs. Methods All patients followed in DANBIO were informed about DANBIO-from-home by electronic invitations or when attending their clinic. Characteristics of patients who did/did not use DANBIO-from-home in the period after implementation were explored by multivariable logistic regression analyses including demographic and clinical variables (gender, age group, diagnosis, disease duration, use of biological disease-modifying agent (bDMARD), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Patient Acceptable Symptom Scale (PASS)). Time from launch to first entry was presented as cumulative incidence curves by age group (<40/40–60/61–80/>80 years). Results Of 33 776 patients, 68% entered PROs using DANBIO-from-home at least once. Median (IQR) time to first entry was 27 (11–152) days. Factors associated with data entry in multivariate analyses (OR (95% CI)) were: female gender (1.19 (1.12 to 1.27)), bDMARD treatment (1.41 (1.33 to 1.50)), age 40–60 years (1.79 (1.63 to 1.97)), 61–80 years (1.87 (1.70 to 2.07), or age >80 years (0.57 (0.50 to 0.65)) (reference: age <40 years), lower HAQ (0.68 (0.65 to 0.71)) and PASS ‘no’ (1.09 (1.02 to 1.17). Diagnosis was not associated. Time to first entry of PROs was longest in patients <40 years of age (119 (24–184) days) and shortest in the 61–80 years age group (25 (8–139) days). Conclusion A nationwide online platform for PRO in rheumatology achieved widespread use. Higher age, male gender, conventional treatment and disability were associated with no use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Glintborg
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dorte Vendelbo Jensen
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Gentofte University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Lene Terslev
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Oliver Hendricks
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Simon Horskjær Rasmussen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Mogens Pfeiffer Jensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Thomas Adelsten
- Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital Koge, Koge, Denmark
| | - Ada Colic
- Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital Koge, Koge, Denmark
| | - Kamilla Danebod
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Malene Kildemand
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Heidi Lausten Munk
- Rheumatology Research Unit, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jens Kristian Pedersen
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Jette Agerbo
- Danish Rheumatism Association/Gigtforeningen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Connie Ziegler
- Danish Rheumatism Association/Gigtforeningen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Glintborg B, Jensen DV, Terslev L, Hendricks O, Østergaard M, Rasmussen SH, Jensen MP, Adelsten T, Colic A, Danebod K, Kildemand M, Loft AG, Munk HL, Pedersen JK, Østgård RD, Sørensen CM, Krogh NS, Agerbo JN, Ziegler C, Hetland ML. Long-term Behavioral Changes During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Impact of Vaccination in Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases. J Rheumatol 2022; 49:1163-1172. [PMID: 35705237 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.211280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore anxiety and self-isolation in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD)15 months into the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, including attitudes toward and effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. METHODS A nationwide online survey was conducted at 3 timepoints: May 2020, November 2020, and May 2021. Patients with IRD followed in the Danish Rheumatology Quality Registry (DANBIO) were asked about the effects of the pandemic, including SARS-CoV-2 infection and their behavior, anxiety, and concerns. The May 2021 survey included attitudes toward SARS-CoV-2 and influenza vaccination. Characteristics associated with self-isolation in May 2021 were explored with adjusted logistic regression analyses that included patient characteristics and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status. RESULTS Respondents to surveys 1, 2, and 3 included 12,789; 14,755; and 13,921 patients, respectively; 64% had rheumatoid arthritis and 63% were female. Anxiety and concerns were highest in May 2020 and decreased to stable levels in November 2020 and May 2021; 86%, 50%, and 52% of respondents reported self-isolation, respectively. In May 2021, 4% of respondents self-reported previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The SARS-CoV-2 vaccine acceptance rate was 86%, and the proportion of patients vaccinated against influenza had increased from 50% in winter 2019-2020 to 64% in winter 2020-2021. The proportion of patients with anxiety appeared similar among those vaccinated and unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. In multivariable analyses, being unvaccinated, female gender, receiving biologic drugs, and poor quality of life were independently associated with self-isolation. CONCLUSION Levels of anxiety and self-isolation decreased after the initial lockdown period in patients with IRD. Half of the patients reported self-isolation in May 2021, a phase that included widespread reopening of society and large-scale vaccination. The lack of prepandemic data prevented a full understanding of the long-term effects of the pandemic on anxiety and self-isolation in patients with IRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Glintborg
- B. Glintborg, MD, PhD, DMSc, M. Østergaard, MD, PhD, DMSc, Professor, M.L. Hetland, MD, PhD, DMSc, Professor, DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen;
| | - Dorte Vendelbo Jensen
- D.V. Jensen, MD, DANBIO, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Copenhagen, and Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Gentofte
| | - Lene Terslev
- L. Terslev, MD, PhD, Professor, M. Pfeiffer Jensen, MD, PhD, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
| | - Oliver Hendricks
- O. Hendricks, MD, Professor, Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, and Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- B. Glintborg, MD, PhD, DMSc, M. Østergaard, MD, PhD, DMSc, Professor, M.L. Hetland, MD, PhD, DMSc, Professor, DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
| | - Simon Horskjær Rasmussen
- S.H. Rasmussen, PhD, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen
| | - Mogens Pfeiffer Jensen
- L. Terslev, MD, PhD, Professor, M. Pfeiffer Jensen, MD, PhD, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
| | - Thomas Adelsten
- T. Adelsten, MD, A. Colic, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge
| | - Ada Colic
- T. Adelsten, MD, A. Colic, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge
| | - Kamilla Danebod
- K. Danebod, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
| | - Malene Kildemand
- M. Kildemand, RN, Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- A. Gitte Loft, MD, DMSc, Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus
| | - Heidi Lausten Munk
- H.L. Munk, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Research Unit, Odense University Hospital and University of Southern Denmark, Odense
| | - Jens Kristian Pedersen
- J.K. Pedersen, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Odense University Hospital and Svendborg Hospital, Svendborg, and Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
| | - René Drage Østgård
- R.D. Østgård, MD, PhD, Diagnostic Center, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg
| | | | | | - Jette Nørgaard Agerbo
- J.N. Agerbo, Patient Representative, C. Ziegler, Patient Representative, Gigtforeningen/Danish Rheumatism Association, Denmark
| | - Connie Ziegler
- J.N. Agerbo, Patient Representative, C. Ziegler, Patient Representative, Gigtforeningen/Danish Rheumatism Association, Denmark
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- B. Glintborg, MD, PhD, DMSc, M. Østergaard, MD, PhD, DMSc, Professor, M.L. Hetland, MD, PhD, DMSc, Professor, DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Onen F, Can G, Capar S, Dalkilic E, Pehlivan Y, Senel S, Akar S, Koca SS, Tufan A, Yazici A, Yilmaz S, Inanc N, Sari I, Birlik M, Solmaz D, Cefle A, Ozturk MA, Yolbas S, Krogh NS, Yilmaz N, Erten S, Bes C, Gunduz OS, Goker B, Haznedaroglu S, Yavuz S, Yildirim Cetin G, Yildiz F, Direskeneli H, Akkoc N. A real-life analysis of patients with rheumatologic diseases on biological treatments: Data from TURKBIO Registry. Eur J Rheumatol 2022; 9:82-87. [PMID: 35546332 PMCID: PMC10176217 DOI: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2022.21060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE TURKBIO registry, established in 2011, is the first nationwide biological database in Turkey. This study aimed to provide an overview of TURKBIO data collected by June 2018. METHODS The registry included adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-AxSpA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Demographic and clinical features, disease activity markers, and other follow-up parameters, current and previous treat- ments, and adverse events were registered electronically at each visit using open-source software. The registration of patient-reported outcome measures was carried out electronically by the patients using touch screens. RESULTS TURKBIO registry included a total of 41,145 treatment series with biologicals. There were 2,588 patients with axSpA (2,459 AS and 129 nr-axSpA), 2,036 with RA, and 428 with PsA. The total number of patients, including those with other diagnoses, was 5,718. In the follow-up period, the number of patients and also visits steadily increased by years. The yearly mean number of visits per patient was found to be 2.3. Significant improvements in disease activity and health assessment parameters were observed following the biological treatments. Biologics were often given in combination with a con- ventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in patients with RA. Infections were the most commonly seen adverse events, followed by allergic reactions. Tuberculosis was observed in 12 patients, malignancy in 18, and treatment-related mortality in 31. CONCLUSION TURKBIO provided a valuable real-life experience with the use of biologics in rheumatic diseases in Turkey.
Collapse
|
14
|
Studenic P, Hensvold A, Kleyer A, van der Helm-van Mil A, Pratt AG, Sieghart D, Krönke G, Williams R, de Souza S, Karlfeldt S, Johannesson M, Krogh NS, Klareskog L, Catrina AI. Prospective Studies on the Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis: The European Risk RA Registry. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:824501. [PMID: 35273981 PMCID: PMC8901993 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.824501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The accumulation of risk for the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is regarded as a continuum that may start with interacting environmental and genetic factors, proceed with the initiation of autoimmunity, and result in the formation of autoantibodies such as anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA). In parallel, at-risk individuals may be asymptomatic or experience joint pain (arthralgia) that is itself non-specific or clinically suspicious for evolving RA, even in the absence of overt arthritis. Optimal strategies for the management of people at-risk of RA, both for symptom control and to delay or prevent progression to classifiable disease, remain poorly understood. Methods To help address this, groups of stakeholders from academia, clinical rheumatology, industry and patient research partners have collaborated to advance understanding, define and study different phases of the at-risk state. In this current report we describe different European initiatives in the field and the successful effort to build a European Registry of at-risk people to facilitate observational and interventional research. Results We outline similarities and differences between cohorts of at-risk individuals at institutions spanning several countries, and how to best combine them within the new database. Over the past 2 years, besides building the technical infrastructure, we have agreed on a core set of variables that all partners should strive to collect for harmonization purposes. Conclusion We emphasize to address this process from different angles and touch on the biologic, epidemiologic, analytic, and regulatory aspects of collaborative studies within a meta-database of people at-risk of RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Studenic
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Internal Medicine 3, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aase Hensvold
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Academic Specialist Centre-Stockholm Health Care Services, Centre for Rheumatology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Arnd Kleyer
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Annette van der Helm-van Mil
- Department of Rheumatology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Arthur G Pratt
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.,Musculoskeletal Services Directorate, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Daniela Sieghart
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerhard Krönke
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ruth Williams
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Savia de Souza
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Susanne Karlfeldt
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Academic Specialist Centre-Stockholm Health Care Services, Centre for Rheumatology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martina Johannesson
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Lars Klareskog
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Rheumatology Section, Theme Inflammation and Infection, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anca I Catrina
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Rheumatology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Oldroyd AGS, Krogh NS, Dixon WG, Chinoy H. Investigating characteristics of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy flares using daily symptom data collected via a smartphone app. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 61:4845-4854. [PMID: 35274670 PMCID: PMC9707041 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to use daily data collected via a smartphone app for characterization of patient-reported and symptom-based (using an a priori definition) flares in an adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) cohort. METHODS UK adults with an IIM answered patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) daily via a smartphone app during a 91-day study. Daily symptom PROMs addressed global activity, overall pain, myalgia, fatigue, and weakness (on a 0-100 visual analogue scale). Patient-reported flares were recorded via a weekly app question. Symptom-based flares were defined via an a priori definition related to increase in daily symptom data from the previous 4-day mean. RESULTS Twenty participants (65% female) participated. Patient-reported flares occurred on a median of 5 weeks (IQR 3, 7) per participant, out of a possible 13. The mean of each symptom score was significantly higher in flare weeks, compared with non-flare weeks (e.g. mean flare week myalgia score 34/100, vs 21/100 during non-flare week, t test P-value <0.01). Fatigue accounted for the most symptom-based flares [incidence-rate 23/100 person-days (95% CI 19, 27)], and myalgia the fewest [incidence rate 13/100 person-days (95% CI 11, 16)]. Symptom-based flares typically resolved after 3 days, although fatigue-predominant flares lasted 2 days. The majority (69%) of patient-reported flare weeks coincided with at least one symptom-based flare. CONCLUSIONS IIM flares are frequent and associated with increased symptom scores. This study has demonstrated the ability to identify and characterize patient-reported and symptom-based flares (based on an a priori definition), using daily app-collected data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander G S Oldroyd
- Correspondence to: Alexander G. S. Oldroyd, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Manchester M13 9PG, UK. E-mail:
| | | | - William G Dixon
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester,Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, UK
| | - Hector Chinoy
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust,Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre,Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Leffers HCB, Westergaard D, Saevarsdottir S, Jonsdottir I, Pedersen OB, genomic consortium DBDS, Troldborg A, Voss A, Kristensen S, Lindhardsen J, Kumar P, Linauskas A, Juul L, Krogh NS, Deleuran B, Dreyer L, Schwinn M, Thørner LW, Hindhede L, Erikstrup C, Ullum H, Brunak S, Stefansson K, Banasik K, Jacobsen S. Established risk loci for systemic lupus erythematosus at NCF2, STAT4, TNPO3, IRF5 and ITGAM associate with distinct clinical manifestations: a Danish genome-wide association study. Joint Bone Spine 2022; 89:105357. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
17
|
Ørnbjerg LM, Svensson E, Løngaard K, Meincke RH, Pedersen JK, Dreyer L, Krogh NS, Jensen DV, Hetland ML. OUP accepted manuscript. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 61:3919-3929. [PMID: 35108380 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and validate in real-world patients a conversion algorithm from the Multidimensionel Health Assessment Questionnaire physical function scale (MDHAQ) to the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index physical function scale (HAQ) score. METHODS From the DANBIO registry, 13 391 patients with RA (n = 8983), PsA (n = 2649) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA, n = 1759) with longitudinal data on HAQ and MDHAQ were included, stratified by diagnosis, and randomized 1:1 into development and validation cohorts. Conversion algorithms were developed by linear regression and applied in validation cohorts. From MDHAQ, the HAQ was calculated (cHAQ) and validated against the observed HAQ for criterion, correlational and construct validity. RESULTS For RA, we developed the conversion algorithm cHAQ = 0.15+MDHAQ*1.08, and validated it in the RA validation cohort. Criterion validity: HAQ and cHAQ had comparable discriminative power to distinguish between high and low patient global scores (standardized mean difference: HAQ:-1.29, cHAQ:-1.35). Kappa value between HAQ and cHAQ functional states indicated good agreement (0.83). Correlational validity: baseline HAQ and cHAQ, respectively, correlated well with patient global scores (r = 0.65/0.67). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement across all functional states. Construct validity: HAQ and cHAQ discriminated equally well between patients reporting symptom state as acceptable vs not, and across responses to an external anchor. Aiming for a common algorithm, the RA conversion algorithm was validated for PsA and axSpA with similar results. CONCLUSION This study suggests that in observational datasets with only the MDHAQ available, a simple algorithm allows valid conversion to HAQ on the group level in RA, PsA and axSpA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lykke M Ørnbjerg
- DANBIO, Copenhagen Centre for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
| | | | - Katja Løngaard
- RKKP - The Danish Clinical Quality Program, Frederiksberg
| | - Rikke H Meincke
- DANBIO, Copenhagen Centre for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
| | - Jens Kristian Pedersen
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine M, Odense University Hospital and Svendborg Hospital, Svendborg
| | - Lene Dreyer
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg
| | | | - Dorte V Jensen
- DANBIO, Copenhagen Centre for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
| | - Merete L Hetland
- DANBIO, Copenhagen Centre for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mathew AJ, Glintborg B, Krogh NS, Hetland ML, Østergaard M. Enthesitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis - data from the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2021; 52:151948. [PMID: 35027245 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the registration, pattern and burden of clinical enthesitis among routine-care patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry. METHODS In patients with PsA and axSpA in DANBIO, prospectively registered data from 2010 to 2020 on clinical entheseal assessment using SPARCC score were compared with demographic, clinical and patient-reported-outcome (PRO) data. RESULTS 6582 PsA and 5547 axSpA patients had their first registration in DANBIO in 2010 or later ("incident cohort"). At these registrations, 1037 (16%) PsA and 1188 (21%) axSpA patients had entheseal assessments, with ≥1 enthesitis being found in 66% and 39%, respectively. Mean enthesitis scores were 2.5 (PsA) and 1.3 (axSpA). Most common sites were: Achilles tendon (right/left/symmetrical: PsA:24.4%/23.3%/17.1%; axSpA:10.4%/10.6%/8.0%), lateral epicondyle (PsA:22.2%/20.1%/16.2%; axSpA:.4%/9.7%/7.6%), plantar fascia (PsA:17.1%/17.0%/12.6%; axSpA:10.4%/10.6%/8.0%), greater trochanter (PsA:14.2%/15.4%/11.7%; axSpA:9.9%/11.2%/8.2%). Enthesitis was more frequent in women (PsA/axSpA 61%/62%) than men (39%/37%). Patients with vs without enthesitis had higher overall burden (higher physician global, swollen/tender joint counts, pain, fatigue, patient global; fewer in patient-acceptable-symptom-state (PASS)) (all p < 0.05). Comparable demographic, clinical and PRO-results in patients with missing entheseal assessments, support the data being representative. In an "overall" cohort of all patients with ≥1 entheseal assessments after 2010, results on enthesitis were comparable. CONCLUSION Entheseal assessments were only performed at a minority of clinical visits. Clinical enthesitis was frequent, particularly in women, often symmetrical and associated with a higher physician- and patient-reported disease burden in patients with PsA and axSpA treated in routine practice, emphasizing the need for systematic assessment in routine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish J Mathew
- The Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; The Danish Rheumatologic Database (DANBIO), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
| | - Bente Glintborg
- The Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; The Danish Rheumatologic Database (DANBIO), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | | - Merete L Hetland
- The Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; The Danish Rheumatologic Database (DANBIO), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- The Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; The Danish Rheumatologic Database (DANBIO), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wetterslev M, Georgiadis S, Juul Sørensen I, Juhl Pedersen S, Christiansen SN, Hetland ML, Brahe CH, Bakkegaard M, Duer A, Boesen M, Gosvig KK, Møller JM, Krogh NS, Jensen B, Madsen OR, Christensen J, Hansen A, Nørregaard J, Røgind H, Østergaard M. Tapering of TNF inhibitors in axial spondyloarthritis in routine care-2-year clinical and MRI outcomes and predictors of successful tapering. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:2398-2412. [PMID: 34636846 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In a 2-year follow-up study of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in clinical remission who tapered tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment according to a clinical guideline, we aimed to investigate the proportion who successfully tapered/discontinued therapy and baseline predictors thereof. The proportion regaining clinical remission after flare and the progression on MRI/radiography were also assessed. METHODS One-hundred-and-nine patients (78(72%)/31(28%) receiving standard respectively reduced dose) in clinical remission (BASDAI < 40, physician global score < 40) and no signs of disease activity the previous year tapered TNFi as follows: to two-thirds of standard dose at baseline, half at week 16, one-third at week 32 and discontinuation at week 48. Patients experiencing clinical, BASDAI or MRI flare (predefined criteria) stopped tapering and escalated to previous dose. Prediction analyses were performed by multivariable regression. RESULTS One-hundred-and-six patients(97%) completed 2-years follow-up; 55 patients(52%) had successfully tapered: 23(22%) receiving two-thirds, 15(14%) half, 16(15%) one-third dose and 1(1%) discontinued. In patients at standard dose at baseline(n = 78), lower physician global score was the only independent predictor of successful tapering (Odds ratio(OR)=0.79(95% Confidence Interval = 0.64-0.93); p= 0.003). In the entire patient group lower physician global score(OR = 0.86(0.75-0.98); p= 0.017), lower Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada(SPARCC) Sacroiliac Joint Erosion score(OR = 0.78(0.57-0.98); p= 0.029) and current smoking(OR = 3.28(1.15-10.57); p= 0.026) were independent predictors of successful tapering. At 2-years, 97% of patients were in clinical remission. Minimal changes in imaging findings were observed. CONCLUSION After two years following a clinical guideline, 52% of patients with axSpA in clinical remission had successfully tapered TNFi, only 1% discontinued. Baseline physician global score was an independent predictor of successful tapering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Wetterslev
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stylianos Georgiadis
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Inge Juul Sørensen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Susanne Juhl Pedersen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sara Nysom Christiansen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,The DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Cecilie Heegaard Brahe
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mads Bakkegaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Duer
- Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikael Boesen
- Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Bente Jensen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ole Rintek Madsen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jan Christensen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Annette Hansen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jesper Nørregaard
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Røgind
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Glintborg B, Jensen DV, Terslev L, Pfeiffer Jensen M, Hendricks O, Østergaard M, Engel S, Horskjær Rasmussen S, Adelsten T, Colic A, Danebod K, Kildemand M, Loft AG, Munk HL, Pedersen JK, Østgård RD, Møller Sørensen C, Krogh NS, Nørgaard Agerbo J, Ziegler C, Hetland ML. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on treat-to-target strategies and physical consultations in >7000 patients with inflammatory arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60:SI3-SI12. [PMID: 34146099 PMCID: PMC8344418 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on treat-to-target strategies (disease activity, remission rates) and access to physical consultations in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease, as well as to explore characteristics of patients with/without physical consultations in the clinic and the impact of early vs established disease. METHODS Patients with RA, PsA or axial SpA (axSpA) prospectively followed in the nationwide DANBIO registry answered online questionnaires and reported patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in June and November 2020. Patient characteristics, disease activity and physical consultations in the clinic before and during the pandemic were identified in DANBIO [all patients and subgroups with early disease (disease duration ≤2 years)]. In individual patients, changes in PROs before and during the pandemic were calculated. Characteristics of patients with/without physical consultations were described (age, gender, education level, comorbidities, disease duration, treatment). RESULTS We included 7836 patients (22% of eligible patients), 12% of which had early disease. PROs were stable before and during the pandemic, with median changes approximating zero, as well as in patients with early disease. Remission rates were stable. The relative decrease in the number of patients with physical consultations was 21-72%, which was highest in axSpA. Characteristics of patients with/without physical consultations were similar. Self-reported satisfaction with treatment options and access was >70%; the preferred contact form was physical consultation (66%). CONCLUSION In this nationwide study performed during the first 8 months of the pandemic, patient satisfaction was high and the PROs and remission rates remained stable despite the remarkable reduction in physical consultations, as well as in patients with early disease. Characteristics of patients with/without physical consultations appeared similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Glintborg
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
| | - Dorte Vendelbo Jensen
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet
- Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital
| | - Lene Terslev
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen
| | - Mogens Pfeiffer Jensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen
| | - Oliver Hendricks
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
| | - Sara Engel
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet
| | - Simon Horskjær Rasmussen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen
| | - Thomas Adelsten
- Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge
| | - Ada Colic
- Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge
| | - Kamilla Danebod
- Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
| | | | - Anne Gitte Loft
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus
| | - Heidi Lausten Munk
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
| | - Jens Kristian Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine M, Odense University Hospital and Svendborg Hospital, Svendborg
| | - René Drage Østgård
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine M, Odense University Hospital and Svendborg Hospital, Svendborg
- Diagnostic Center, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg
| | | | | | | | | | - Merete Lund Hetland
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Møller-Bisgaard S, Hørslev-Petersen K, Ejbjerg B, Hetland ML, Christensen R, Ørnbjerg LM, Glinatsi D, Møller JM, Boesen M, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Madsen OR, Jensen B, Villadsen JA, Hauge EM, Bennett P, Hendricks O, Asmussen K, Kowalski M, Lindegaard H, Bliddal H, Krogh NS, Ellingsen T, Nielsen AH, Larsen L, Jurik AG, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M. Effect of initiating biologics compared to intensifying conventional DMARDs on clinical and MRI outcomes in established rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical remission: Secondary analyses of the IMAGINE-RA trial. Scand J Rheumatol 2021; 51:268-278. [PMID: 34474649 DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2021.1935312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the effect of treat-to-target-based escalations in conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologics on clinical disease activity and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) inflammation in a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cohort in clinical remission.Method: One-hundred patients with established RA, Disease Activity Score based on 28-joint count-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) < 3.2, and no swollen joints (hereafter referred to as 'in clinical remission') who received csDMARDs underwent clinical evaluation and MRI of the wrist and second to fifth metacarpophalangeal joints every 4 months. They followed a 2 year MRI treatment strategy targeting DAS28-CRP ≤ 3.2, no swollen joints, and absence of MRI osteitis, with predefined algorithmic treatment escalation: first: increase in csDMARDs; second: adding a biologic; third: switch biologic. MRI osteitis and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (co-primary outcomes) and MRI combined inflammation and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) (key secondary outcomes) were assessed 4 months after treatment change and expressed as estimates of group differences. Statistical analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population analysed using repeated-measures mixed models.Escalation to first biologic compared to csDMARD escalation more effectively reduced MRI osteitis (difference between least squares means 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.6), HAQ score (0.08, 0.03-0.1), MRI combined inflammation (2.5, 0.9-4.1), and SDAI scores (2.7, 1.9-3.5).Treat-to-target-based treatment escalations to biologics compared to escalation in csDMARDs more effectively improved MRI inflammation, physical function, and clinical disease activity in patients with established RA in clinical remission. Treatment escalation in RA patients in clinical remission reduces clinical and MRI-assessed disease activity.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01656278.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Møller-Bisgaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Rheumatology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - K Hørslev-Petersen
- Department of Rheumatology, Sønderborg Sygehus, Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Sønderborg, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - B Ejbjerg
- Department of Rheumatology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - M L Hetland
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - R Christensen
- Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.,Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - L M Ørnbjerg
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - D Glinatsi
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Rheumatology, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden
| | - J M Møller
- Department of Radiology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - M Boesen
- Department of Radiology, Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - K Stengaard-Pedersen
- Department of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - O R Madsen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - B Jensen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - J A Villadsen
- Department of Rheumatology, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - E M Hauge
- Department of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - P Bennett
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - O Hendricks
- Department of Rheumatology, Sønderborg Sygehus, Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Sønderborg, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - K Asmussen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - M Kowalski
- Department of Rheumatology, Sygehus Vendsyssel i Hjørring, Hjørring, Denmark
| | - H Lindegaard
- Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - H Bliddal
- The Parker Institute, Department of Rheumatology, Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | | | - T Ellingsen
- Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - A H Nielsen
- Department of Radiology, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - L Larsen
- Department of Radiology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - A G Jurik
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - H S Thomsen
- Department of Radiology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - M Østergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lindström U, Glintborg B, Di Giuseppe D, Schjødt Jørgensen T, Gudbjornsson B, Lederballe Grøn K, Aarrestad Provan S, Michelsen B, Lund Hetland M, Wallman JK, Nordström D, Trokovic N, Love TJ, Krogh NS, Askling J, Jacobsson LTH, Kristensen LE. Comparison of treatment retention and response to secukinumab versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60:3635-3645. [PMID: 33367900 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare treatment retention and response to secukinumab vs adalimumab, including the other four TNF inhibitors (TNFi) as comparators, in PsA. METHODS All patients with PsA starting secukinumab or a TNFi in 2015-2018 were identified in the biologic registers of the Nordic countries. Data on comorbidities were linked from national registers. One-year treatment retention and hazard ratios (HRs) for treatment discontinuation were calculated. The proportion achieving a 6 month 28-joint Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA28) remission was determined together with odds ratios (ORs) for remission (logistic regression). Both HRs and ORs were calculated with adalimumab as the reference and adjusted for baseline characteristics and concurrent comorbidities. All analyses were stratified by the line of biologic treatment (first, second, third+). RESULTS We identified 6143 patients contributing 8307 treatment courses (secukinumab, 1227; adalimumab, 1367). Secukinumab was rarely used as the first biologic, otherwise baseline characteristics were similar. No clinically significant differences in treatment retention or response rates were observed for secukinumab vs adalimumab. The adjusted HRs for discontinuation per the first, second and third line of treatment were 0.98 (95% CI 0.68, 1.41), 0.94 (0.70, 1.26) and 1.07 (0.84, 1.36), respectively. The ORs for DAPSA28 remission in the first, second and third line of treatment were 0.62 (95% CI 0.30, 1.28), 0.85 (0.41, 1.78) and 0.74 (0.36, 1.51), respectively. In the subset of patients previously failing a TNFi due to ineffectiveness, the results were similar. CONCLUSION No significant differences in treatment retention or response were observed between secukinumab and adalimumab, regardless of the line of treatment. This suggests that even in patients who have failed a TNFi, choosing either another TNFi or secukinumab may be equally effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulf Lindström
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Bente Glintborg
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniela Di Giuseppe
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tanja Schjødt Jørgensen
- Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bjorn Gudbjornsson
- Centre for Rheumatology Research, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Kathrine Lederballe Grøn
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Brigitte Michelsen
- Department of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of Southern Norway Trust, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Johan K Wallman
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Dan Nordström
- Department of Medicine and rheumatology, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Thorvardur Jon Love
- Centre for Rheumatology Research, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | - Johan Askling
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lennart T H Jacobsson
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lars Erik Kristensen
- Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Uhrenholt L, Christensen R, Dreyer L, Schlemmer A, Hauge EM, Krogh NS, Abildtoft MK, Taylor PC, Kristensen S. Using a novel smartphone application for capturing of patient-reported outcome measures among patients with inflammatory arthritis:A randomized, crossover, agreement study. Scand J Rheumatol 2021; 51:25-33. [PMID: 34151710 DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2021.1907925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: In Denmark, patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) have completed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) via touchscreens in the outpatient clinic since 2006. However, current technology makes it possible for patients to use their own smartphone via an application (app) developed for the Danish Rheumatology Database (DANBIO). This study aims to evaluate the agreement of PROMs between the DANBIO app and outpatient touchscreen in patients with IA.Method: Patients with IA (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis) were enrolled in a randomized, crossover, agreement study. Participants answered PROMs through the two device types in a randomized order. Differences in PROM scores with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were evaluated for similarity according to prespecified equivalence margins.Results: The touchscreen invitation was accepted by 138 patients. Sixty patients (20 with each diagnosis) were included. The difference in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index between the two device types was -0.007 (95% CI -0.043 to 0.030); thus, equivalence was demonstrated. In addition, all other PROMs obtained with the two device types were equivalent, except for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), which was within the limits of minimally clinically important difference (MCID). In total, 78.3% preferred the DANBIO app.Conclusion: In patients with IA, equivalence was demonstrated between two device types for all PROMs except BASDAI; however, BASDAI was within the limits of the MCID. Implementation of the DANBIO app is expected to optimize outpatient visits, thereby improving healthcare for the individual patient and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Uhrenholt
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.,Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,The DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - R Christensen
- Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - L Dreyer
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - A Schlemmer
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - E-M Hauge
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - P C Taylor
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Kristensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Glintborg B, Jensen DV, Engel S, Terslev L, Pfeiffer Jensen M, Hendricks O, Østergaard M, Horskjær Rasmussen S, Adelsten T, Colic A, Danebod K, Kildemand M, Loft AG, Munk HL, Pedersen JK, Østgård RD, Møller Sørensen C, Krogh NS, Nørgaard Agerbo J, Ziegler C, Lund Hetland M. Anxiety and concerns related to the work situation during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in >5000 patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease followed in the DANBIO registry. RMD Open 2021; 7:rmdopen-2021-001649. [PMID: 33941664 PMCID: PMC8098969 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Glintborg
- DANBIO, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark .,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Kobenhavn, Denmark.,Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Dorte Vendelbo Jensen
- DANBIO, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Hovedstaden, Denmark
| | - Sara Engel
- DANBIO, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.,Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Lene Terslev
- DANBIO, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Kobenhavn, Denmark.,Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Mogens Pfeiffer Jensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Kobenhavn, Denmark.,Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Oliver Hendricks
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatology, University of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Syddanmark, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Kobenhavn, Denmark.,Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Simon Horskjær Rasmussen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Thomas Adelsten
- Department of Rheumatology, Sjællands Universitetshospital Køge, Koge, Sjælland, Denmark
| | - Ada Colic
- Department of Rheumatology, Sjællands Universitetshospital Køge, Koge, Sjælland, Denmark
| | - Kamilla Danebod
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Malene Kildemand
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Midtjylland, Denmark
| | - Heidi Lausten Munk
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark
| | - Jens Kristian Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark.,Department of Medicine M, Svendborg, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark
| | - René Drage Østgård
- Diagnostic center, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Midtjylland, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Connie Ziegler
- Danish Rheumatism Association/Gigtforeningen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- DANBIO, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Kobenhavn, Denmark.,Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nabi H, Georgiadis S, Loft AG, Hendricks O, Jensen DV, Andersen M, Chrysidis S, Colic A, Danebod K, Hussein MR, Kalisz MH, Kristensen S, Lomborg N, Manilo N, Munk HL, Pedersen JK, Raun JL, Mehnert F, Krogh NS, Hetland ML, Glintborg B. Comparative effectiveness of two adalimumab biosimilars in 1318 real-world patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease mandated to switch from originator adalimumab: nationwide observational study emulating a randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 80:1400-1409. [PMID: 33926921 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-219951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In 2018, a nationwide mandatory switch from originator to biosimilar adalimumab was conducted in Denmark. The available biosimilar was GP2017 (Hyrimoz) in Eastern regions and SB5 (Imraldi) in Western regions. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of GP2017 versus SB5 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)/psoriatic arthritis (PsA)/axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA). METHODS Observational cohort study based on the DANBIO registry with geographical cluster pseudo-randomisation, analysed by emulating a randomised clinical trial. Main outcome was adjusted 1-year treatment retention (Cox regression). Furthermore, 6 months' remission rates (logistic regression), reasons for withdrawal and back-switching to originator were investigated (overall and stratified by indication). RESULTS Overall, of 1570 eligible patients, 1318 switched and were included (467 RA/321 PsA/530 AxSpA); 623 (47%) switched to GP2017, 695 (53%) to SB5. Baseline characteristics of the two clusters were largely similar, but some differences in registration practice were observed. The combined 1-year retention rate for the two biosimilars was 89.5%. Compared with SB5, estimated risk of withdrawal for GP2017 was lower (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.86) and 6 months' remission rate was higher (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.25 to 2.37). Stratified analyses gave similar results (statistically significant for RA). During 1 year, 8.5% and 12.9% withdrew GP2017 and SB5, respectively (primarily lack of effect and adverse events), of whom 48 patients (3.6%) back-switched. CONCLUSION This head-to-head comparison of GP2017 versus SB5 following a mandatory switch from the originator indicated differences in effectiveness in routine care. This may reflect a true difference, but other explanations, for example, differences in excipients, differences between clusters and residual confounding cannot be ruled out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hafsah Nabi
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark .,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stylianos Georgiadis
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Oliver Hendricks
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Dorte Vendelbo Jensen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rønne Hospital, Rønne, Denmark.,Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Marlene Andersen
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark
| | | | - Ada Colic
- Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Kamilla Danebod
- Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | | - Maren Høgberget Kalisz
- Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Salome Kristensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Niels Lomborg
- Department of Rheumatology, Vejle Hospital Lillebælt, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Natalia Manilo
- Department of Rheumatology, Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Heidi Lausten Munk
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| | | | | | - Frank Mehnert
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Merete Lund Hetland
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bente Glintborg
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Møller-Bisgaard S, Georgiadis S, Hørslev-Petersen K, Ejbjerg B, Hetland ML, Ørnbjerg LM, Glinatsi D, Møller J, Boesen M, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Madsen OR, Jensen B, Villadsen JA, Hauge EM, Bennett P, Hendricks O, Asmussen K, Kowalski M, Lindegaard H, Bliddal H, Krogh NS, Ellingsen T, Nielsen AH, Balding L, Jurik AG, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M. Predictors of joint damage progression and stringent remission in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60:380-391. [PMID: 32929463 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To study if clinical, radiographic and MRI markers can predict MRI and radiographic damage progression and achievement of stringent remission in patients with established RA in clinical remission followed by a targeted treatment strategy. METHODS RA patients (DAS28-CRP <3.2, no swollen joints) receiving conventional synthetic DMARDs were randomized to conventional or MRI-targeted treat-to-target strategies with predefined algorithmic treatment escalations. Potentially predictive baseline variables were tested in multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS In the 171 patients included, baseline MRI osteitis independently predicted progression in MRI erosion [odds ratio (OR) 1.13 (95% CI 1.06, 1.22)], joint space narrowing [OR 1.15 (95% CI 1.07, 1.24)] and combined damage [OR 1.23 (95% CI 1.13, 1.37)], while tenosynovitis independently predicted MRI erosion progression [OR 1.13 (95% CI 1.03, 1.25)]. A predictor of radiographic erosion progression was age, while gender predicted progression in joint space narrowing. Following an MRI treat-to-target strategy predicted stringent remission across all remission definitions: Clinical Disease Activity Index remission OR 2.94 (95% CI 1.25, 7.52), Simplified Disease Activity Index remission OR 2.50 (95% CI 1.01, 6.66), ACR/EULAR Boolean remission OR 5.47 (95% CI 2.33, 14.13). Similarly, low tender joint count and low patient visual analogue scale pain and global independently predicted achievement of more stringent remission. CONCLUSION Baseline MRI osteitis and tenosynovitis were independent predictors of 2 year MRI damage progression in RA patients in clinical remission, while independent predictors of radiographic damage progression were age and gender. Following an MRI treat-to-target strategy, low scores of patient-reported outcomes and low tender joint count predicted achievement of stringent remission. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), NCT01656278.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Signe Møller-Bisgaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Rheumatology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Stylianos Georgiadis
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Kim Hørslev-Petersen
- Department of Rheumatology, Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Sønderborg, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Bo Ejbjerg
- Department of Rheumatology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Daniel Glinatsi
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Rheumatology, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden
| | - Jakob Møller
- Department of Radiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Mikael Boesen
- Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Kristian Stengaard-Pedersen
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ole Rintek Madsen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Bente Jensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | | | - Ellen-Margrethe Hauge
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Philip Bennett
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Oliver Hendricks
- Department of Rheumatology, Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Sønderborg, Denmark
| | - Karsten Asmussen
- Department of Rheumatology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Marcin Kowalski
- Department of Rheumatology, Hjørring Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark
| | - Hanne Lindegaard
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Henning Bliddal
- Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Torkell Ellingsen
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Lone Balding
- Department of Radiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Anne Grethe Jurik
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Henrik S Thomsen
- Department of Radiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Leffers HCB, Troldborg A, Voss A, Kristensen S, Lindhardsen J, Kumar P, Linauskas A, Juul L, Krogh NS, Deleuran B, Dreyer L, Jacobsen S. Smoking associates with distinct clinical phenotypes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a nationwide Danish cross-sectional study. Lupus Sci Med 2021; 8:8/1/e000474. [PMID: 33811110 PMCID: PMC8023756 DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Objectives SLE displays large clinical heterogeneity that beyond genetic factors may be determined by environmental exposures. In this Danish nationwide study, we aimed to determine if clinical subsets of SLE were associated with smoking history. Methods At each of six participating centres, incident or prevalent inpatients and outpatients with SLE were consecutively included. Manifestations forming the basis of SLE classification were registered in an electronic chart system. Patients also provided questionnaire-based data on environmental exposures, including smoking history. Hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to determine and characterise subsets of patients with similar traits of disease manifestations. Levels of smoking exposure by pack-years were correlated to the identified SLE subsets, as well as discrete SLE manifestations. Results The cohort consisted of 485 patients (88% women and 92% Caucasian) with SLE of which 51% were ever smokers. Common disease manifestations comprised non-erosive arthritis (81%), malar rash (57%), lymphopenia (55%), photosensitivity (50%) and persistent proteinuria (41%). We identified three distinct phenotypic clusters characterised by their preponderance of (A) neurological, serosal and mucosal involvement; (B) renal, haematological and immunological disorders; and (C) acute and chronic skin manifestations. Cluster B was the youngest and had the lowest level of smoking exposure. Age-adjusted regression analyses showed that compared with never smokers a smoking history of >20 pack-years was associated with neurological disorder (OR=3.16), discoid rash (OR=2.22), photosensitivity (OR=2.19) and inversely with haematological disorder (OR=0.40), renal disorder (OR=0.40) and non-erosive arthritis (OR=0.45), p<0.05 for all. Conclusions Our findings support that SLE presents in varying clinical phenotypes and suggest that they may have differentiated associations with smoking history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrik Christian Bidstrup Leffers
- Lupus and Vasculitis Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark
| | - Anne Troldborg
- Departments of Biomedicine and Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anne Voss
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Salome Kristensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, North Denmark Region, Denmark
| | - Jesper Lindhardsen
- Lupus and Vasculitis Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark
| | - Prabhat Kumar
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, North Denmark Region, Denmark
| | - Asta Linauskas
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, North Denmark Region, Denmark
| | - Lars Juul
- Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Hovedstaden, Denmark
| | | | - Bent Deleuran
- Departments of Biomedicine and Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lene Dreyer
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, North Denmark Region, Denmark
| | - Søren Jacobsen
- Lupus and Vasculitis Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen, Hovedstaden, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Terslev L, Brahe CH, Hetland ML, Georgiadis S, Ellegaard K, Juul L, Huynh T, Døhn UM, Fana V, Møller T, Krabbe S, Ørnbjerg LM, Glinatsi D, Røgind H, Hansen A, Nørregaard J, Jacobsen S, Jensen DV, Manilo N, Asmussen K, Boesen M, Rastiemadabadi Z, Morsel-Carlsen L, Møller JM, Krogh NS, Østergaard M. Doppler ultrasound predicts successful discontinuation of biological DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical remission. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60:5549-5559. [PMID: 33748831 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the ability of ultrasound to predict successful tapering and successful discontinuation of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) at 2-year follow-up in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in sustained remission. METHODS Patients in sustained remission (DAS28-CRP≤2.6) and no radiographic progression the previous year tapered bDMARD according to a standardized regime. One-hundred-and-nineteen of these patients were included in this ultrasound sub-study. At baseline, clinical assessment, MRI, x-ray and ultrasound of 24 joints were performed. Ultrasound-detected synovitis was defined and scored 0-3 using the Outcome in Rheumatology (OMERACT) scoring system at joint level for both greyscale and Doppler activity. Sum scores for each ultrasound modality were calculated for 24 joints at patient level. Final state of treatment was assessed after 2 years. The predictive value of ultrasound measures for successful tapering and discontinuation at 2-year follow-up was assessed via logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Negative IgM-RF (OR = 0.29; 95% Confidence Interval (CI)=0.10-0.85; p = 0.024) and lower Doppler sum score of 24 joints (OR(95%CI)=0.44;(0.15-0.87); p = 0.014) were independent predictors for successful discontinuation of bDMARD at 2-year follow-up. The predictive value of Doppler sum score was independent of MRI findings. Previous numbers of bDMARDs were predictive of successful tapering (OR(95% CI)=0.58(0.35-0.91); p = 0.018), whereas ultrasound was not. Clinical parameters were not predictive for successful tapering/discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS Doppler sum score was an independent predictor for successful discontinuation of bDMARDs at 2-year follow-up - the odds for achieving successful discontinuation decreased by 56% per one-unit increase in Doppler sum score. Ultrasound could not predict successful tapering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lene Terslev
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Cecilie Heegaard Brahe
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,DANBIO registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Stylianos Georgiadis
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Karen Ellegaard
- The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Juul
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of head and orthopedics, Gentofte, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Tuan Huynh
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark.,Holte Rheumatology Clinic, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Uffe Møller Døhn
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Viktoria Fana
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Torsten Møller
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Simon Krabbe
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Daniel Glinatsi
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark.,Department of Rheumatology, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden
| | - Henrik Røgind
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Anette Hansen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of head and orthopedics, Gentofte, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Jesper Nørregaard
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Søren Jacobsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Copenhagen Lupus and Vasculitis Clinic, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dorte Vendelbo Jensen
- DANBIO registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark.,Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of head and orthopedics, Gentofte, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Natalia Manilo
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of head and orthopedics, Frederiksberg, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Karsten Asmussen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of head and orthopedics, Frederiksberg, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark
| | - Mikael Boesen
- Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Lone Morsel-Carlsen
- Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Glostrup, Rigshospitalet, Capital Region, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Michelsen B, Ørnbjerg LM, Kvien TK, Pavelka K, Nissen MJ, Nordström D, Santos MJ, Koca SS, Askling J, Rotar Z, Gudbjornsson B, Codreanu C, Loft AG, Kristianslund EK, Mann HF, Ciurea A, Eklund KK, Vieira-Sousa E, Yazici A, Jacobsson L, Tomšič M, Löve TJ, Ionescu R, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Iannone F, Pombo-Suarez M, Jones GT, Hyldstrup LH, Krogh NS, Hetland ML, Østergaard M. Impact of discordance between patient's and evaluator's global assessment on treatment outcomes in 14 868 patients with spondyloarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 59:2455-2461. [PMID: 31960053 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of 'patient's minus evaluator's global assessment of disease activity' (ΔPEG) at treatment initiation on retention and remission rates of TNF inhibitors (TNFi) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients across Europe. METHODS Real-life data from PsA and axSpA patients starting their first TNFi from 11 countries in the European Spondyloarthritis Research Collaboration Network were pooled. Retention rates were compared by Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank test and by Cox regression, and remission rates by χ2 test and by logistic regression across quartiles of baseline ΔPEG, separately in female and male PsA and axSpA patients. RESULTS We included 14 868 spondyloarthritis (5855 PsA, 9013 axSpA) patients. Baseline ΔPEG was negatively associated with 6/12/24-months' TNFi retention rates in female and male PsA and axSpA patients (P <0.001), with 6/12/24-months' BASDAI < 2 (P ≤0.002) and ASDAS < 1.3 (P ≤0.005) in axSpA patients, and with DAS28CRP(4)<2.6 (P ≤0.04) and DAPSA28 ≤ 4 (P ≤0.01), but not DAS28CRP(3)<2.6 (P ≥0.13) in PsA patients, with few exceptions on remission rates. Retention and remission rates were overall lower in female than male patients. CONCLUSION High baseline patient's compared with evaluator's global assessment was associated with lower 6/12/24-months' remission as well as retention rates of first TNFi in both PsA and axSpA patients. These results highlight the importance of discordance between patient's and evaluator's perspective on disease outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigitte Michelsen
- EuroSpA Coordinating Center, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of Southern Norway Trust, Kristiansand.,Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg
- EuroSpA Coordinating Center, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Tore K Kvien
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karel Pavelka
- Institute of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michael J Nissen
- Department of Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dan Nordström
- ROB-FIN Registry, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Maria José Santos
- Reuma.pt Registry and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Suleyman Serdar Koca
- TURKBIO Registry and Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Johan Askling
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ziga Rotar
- BioRx.si and the Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Bjorn Gudbjornsson
- Centre for Rheumatology Research (ICEBIO), University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Catalin Codreanu
- Center of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Carol Davila', Bucharest, Romania
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Eirik Klami Kristianslund
- DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Herman F Mann
- Institute of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Adrian Ciurea
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kari K Eklund
- Inflammation Center, Department of Rheumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Elsa Vieira-Sousa
- Reuma.pt Registry and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Ayten Yazici
- TURKBIO Registry and Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Izmit, Turkey
| | - Lennart Jacobsson
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Matija Tomšič
- BioRx.si and the Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Thorvardur Jón Löve
- University of Iceland, Faculty of Medicine, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Ruxandra Ionescu
- Center of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Carol Davila', Bucharest, Romania
| | - I E van der Horst-Bruinsma
- Department Rheumatology & Immunology Center (ARC), Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Florenzo Iannone
- GISEA Registry, Rheumatology Unit - DETO, University of Bari, Italy
| | - Manuel Pombo-Suarez
- Rheumatology Service, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Gareth T Jones
- Epidemiology Group, School of Medicine, Medical Science and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Lise Hejl Hyldstrup
- EuroSpA Coordinating Center, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | | - Merete Lund Hetland
- EuroSpA Coordinating Center, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- EuroSpA Coordinating Center, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Glintborg B, Jensen DV, Engel S, Terslev L, Pfeiffer Jensen M, Hendricks O, Ostergaard M, Horskjær Rasmussen S, Adelsten T, Colic A, Danebod K, Kildemand M, Loft AG, Munk HL, Pedersen JK, Østgård RD, Møller Sørensen C, Krogh NS, Agerbo J, Ziegler C, Hetland M. Self-protection strategies and health behaviour in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic: results and predictors in more than 12 000 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases followed in the Danish DANBIO registry. RMD Open 2021; 7:e001505. [PMID: 33402443 PMCID: PMC7786545 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS In Danish patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases to explore self-protection strategies and health behaviour including adherence to disease-modifying antirheumatic treatment (DMARD) during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and again after the reopening of the society started. Furthermore, to identify characteristics of patients with high levels of anxiety and self-isolation. METHODS Patients in routine care followed prospectively in the nationwide DANBIO registry were invited to answer an online questionnaire regarding disease activity and COVID-19 infection, behaviour in March and June 2020. Responses were linked to patient data in DANBIO. Characteristics potentially associated with anxiety, self-isolation and medication adherence (gender/age/diagnosis/education/work status/comorbidity/DMARD/smoking/EQ-5D/disease activity) were explored with multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS We included 12 789 patients (8168 rheumatoid arthritis/2068 psoriatic arthritis/1758 axial spondyloarthritis/795 other) of whom 65% were women and 36% treated with biological DMARD. Self-reported COVID-19 prevalence was 0.3%. Patients reported that they were worried to get COVID-19 infection (March/June: 70%/45%) and self-isolated more than others of the same age (48%/38%). The fraction of patients who changed medication due to fear of COVID-19 were 4.1%/0.6%. Female gender, comorbidities, not working, lower education, biological treatment and poor European Quality of life, 5 dimensions were associated with both anxiety and self-isolation. CONCLUSION In >12 000 patients with inflammatory arthritis, we found widespread anxiety and self-isolation, but high medication adherence, in the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. This persisted during the gradual opening of society during the following months. Attention to patients' anxiety and self-isolation is important during this and potential future epidemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Glintborg
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dorte Vendelbo Jensen
- DANBIO, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Hovedstaden, Denmark
| | - Sara Engel
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Lene Terslev
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Mogens Pfeiffer Jensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Oliver Hendricks
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Syddanmark, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Simon Horskjær Rasmussen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Thomas Adelsten
- Department of Rheumatology, Sjællands Universitetshospital Køge, Koge, Sjælland, Denmark
| | - Ada Colic
- Department of Rheumatology, Sjællands Universitetshospital Køge, Koge, Sjælland, Denmark
| | - Kamilla Danebod
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Malene Kildemand
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Midtjylland, Denmark
| | - Heidi Lausten Munk
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark
| | | | - René Drage Østgård
- Diagnostic Center, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Midtjylland, Denmark
| | | | | | - Jette Agerbo
- Danish Rheumatism Association/Gigtforeningen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Connie Ziegler
- Danish Rheumatism Association/Gigtforeningen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Merete Hetland
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hansen S, Hilberg O, Ulrik CS, Bodtger U, M. Rasmussen L, D. Assing K, Wimmer-Aune A, B. Rasmussen K, Bjerring N, Christiansen A, Schmid J, Krogh NS, Porsbjerg C. The Danish severe asthma register: an electronic platform for severe asthma management and research. Eur Clin Respir J 2020; 8:1842117. [PMID: 33209214 PMCID: PMC7646603 DOI: 10.1080/20018525.2020.1842117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The evaluation and management of severe asthma patients require collection of comprehensive information, which is often a challenge in a busy outpatient clinic. The Danish Severe Asthma Register (DSAR) was designed as an electronic patient record form that captures operational clinical data and provides a clinical overview of the severe asthma patient. DSAR is a nationwide register; all patients in Denmark who are treated with biologics for severe asthma are included, and data are as a minimum entered at start of biological treatment, after four and 12 months of treatment, and hereafter annually. Currently, there are data from 621 treatment courses with biologics included in DSAR, with 71% of patients treated with anti-IL-5 drugs and 29% with an anti-IgE drug. Patients enter Patient Reported Outcome Measures electronically on tablets when they arrive in the outpatient clinic and their answers are immediately available to the clinician during the consultation. Nurses and doctors enter clinical data into DSAR during the consultation. DSAR offers immediate access to well-presented longitudinal overview and automatically creates a journal output that can be copy-pasted into the hospital's existing health record form. DSAR is also currently expanding with an app, to be used for monitoring of home-treatment. In addition to serving as an electronic patient record form, DSAR will also provide opportunities to monitor the real-life efficacy of biological treatment for severe asthma in Denmark, and it will be a valuable research platform that will aid in answering important research questions on severe asthma in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Hansen
- Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Respiratory Research Unit, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ole Hilberg
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Suppli Ulrik
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Uffe Bodtger
- Institute of Regional Health Services Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Naestved Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Linda M. Rasmussen
- Allergy Clinic, Department of Dermato-Allergology, Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karin D. Assing
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Kirsten B. Rasmussen
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Niels Bjerring
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anders Christiansen
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Johannes Schmid
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Niels Steen Krogh
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Celeste Porsbjerg
- Respiratory Research Unit, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Eliasen A, Abildtoft MK, Krogh NS, Rechnitzer C, Brok JS, Mathiasen R, Schmiegelow K, Dalhoff KP. Smartphone App to Self-Monitor Nausea During Pediatric Chemotherapy Treatment: User-Centered Design Process. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8:e18564. [PMID: 32706744 PMCID: PMC7400028 DOI: 10.2196/18564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nausea and vomiting are common and distressing side effects for children receiving chemotherapy. Limited evidence is available to guide antiemetic recommendations; therefore, prospective and reliable evaluation of antiemetic efficacy is needed. Smartphone apps can be used to effortlessly and precisely collect patient-reported outcomes in real time. Objective Our objective was to develop a smartphone app to monitor nausea and vomiting episodes in pediatric cancer patients aged 0 to 18 years and to test its usability and adherence to its use. Methods We used a user-centered design process and the evolutionary prototype model to develop and evaluate the app. Multidisciplinary group discussions and several rounds of patient feedback and modification were conducted. We translated the validated Pediatric Nausea Assessment Tool to assess nausea severity in children aged 4 to 18 years. The child’s own term for nausea was interactively incorporated in the nausea severity question, with response options expressed as 4 illustrative faces. Parent-reported outcomes were used for children aged 0 to 3 years. Reminders were sent using push notifications in order to ensure high response rates. Children aged 0 to 18 years who were undergoing chemotherapy were recruited from the Department of Pediatric Oncology at Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet to evaluate the app. Results The app’s most important function was to record nausea severity in children. After assistance from a researcher, children aged 4 to 18 years were able to report their symptoms in the app, and parents were able to report symptoms for their children aged 0 to 3 years. Children (n=20, aged 2.0-17.5 years) and their parents evaluated the app prospectively during a collective total of 60 chemotherapy cycles. They expressed that the app was user-friendly, intuitive, and that the time spent on data entry was fair. The response rates were on average 92%, 93%, and 80% for the day before, the first day of, and the next 3 days after chemotherapy, respectively. Researchers and clinicians were able to obtain an overview of the patient’s chemotherapy dates and responses through a secure and encrypted web-based administrative portal. Data could be downloaded for further analysis. Conclusions The user-friendly app could be used to facilitate future pediatric antiemetic trials and to refine antiemetic treatment during chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Eliasen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Catherine Rechnitzer
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jesper Sune Brok
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - René Mathiasen
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kjeld Schmiegelow
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kim Peder Dalhoff
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pincus T, Castrejon I, Riad M, Obreja E, Lewis C, Krogh NS. Reliability, Feasibility, and Patient Acceptance of an Electronic Version of a Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire for Routine Rheumatology Care: Validation and Patient Preference Study. JMIR Form Res 2020; 4:e15815. [PMID: 32459182 PMCID: PMC7287716 DOI: 10.2196/15815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) that was developed primarily for routine rheumatology care has advanced clinical research concerning disease burden, disability, and mortality in rheumatic diseases. Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), an index within the MDHAQ, is the most widely used index to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical care in the United States, and it recognizes clinical status changes in all studied rheumatic diseases. MDHAQ physical function scores are far more significant in the prognosis of premature RA mortality than laboratory or imaging data. However, electronic medical records (EMRs) generally do not include patient questionnaires. An electronic MDHAQ (eMDHAQ), linked by fast healthcare interoperability resources (FIHR) to an EMR, can facilitate clinical and research advances. OBJECTIVE This study analyzed the reliability, feasibility, and patient acceptance of an eMDHAQ. METHODS Since 2006, all Rush University Medical Center rheumatology patients with all diagnoses have been asked to complete a paper MDHAQ at each routine care encounter. In April 2019, patients were invited to complete an eMDHAQ at the conclusion of the encounter. Analyses were conducted to determine the reliability of eMDHAQ versus paper MDHAQ scores, arithmetically and by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The feasibility of the eMDHAQ was analyzed based on the time for patient completion. The patient preference for the electronic or paper version was analyzed through a patient paper questionnaire. RESULTS The 98 study patients were a typical routine rheumatology patient group. Seven paper versus eMDHAQ scores were within 2%, differences neither clinically nor statistically significant. ICCs of 0.86-0.98 also indicated good to excellent reliability. Mean eMDHAQ completion time was a feasible 8.2 minutes. The eMDHAQ was preferred by 72% of patients; preferences were similar according to age and educational level. CONCLUSIONS The results on a paper MDHAQ versus eMDHAQ were similar. Most patients preferred an eMDHAQ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Isabel Castrejon
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.,Department of Rheumatology, General University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariam Riad
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Elena Obreja
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Candice Lewis
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Glintborg B, Georgiadis S, Loft AG, Linauskas A, Lindegaard H, Hendricks O, Jensen DV, Andersen BL, Danebod K, Villumsen A, Eng G, Wiell C, Manilo N, Kristensen S, Raun J, Grydehøj J, Chrysidis S, Nørgaard M, Mehnert F, Krogh NS, Hetland ML. Hospital contacts due to hepatobiliary adverse events in >5000 patients with inflammatory joint disease treated with originator or biosimilar etanercept (SB4): an observational nationwide study applying linkage between DANBIO and national registries. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:846-848. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
35
|
Brahe CH, Ørnbjerg LM, Jacobsson L, Nissen MJ, Kristianslund EK, Mann H, Santos MJ, Reino JG, Nordström D, Rotar Z, Gudbjornsson B, Onen F, Codreanu C, Lindström U, Möller B, Kvien TK, Pavelka K, Barcelos A, Sánchez-Piedra C, Eklund KK, Tomšič M, Love TJ, Can G, Ionescu R, Loft AG, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Macfarlane GJ, Iannone F, Hyldstrup LH, Krogh NS, Østergaard M, Hetland ML. Retention and response rates in 14 261 PsA patients starting TNF inhibitor treatment—results from 12 countries in EuroSpA. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019; 59:1640-1650. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Revised: 06/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To investigate TNF inhibitor (TNFi) retention and response rates in European biologic-naïve patients with PsA.
Methods
Prospectively collected data on PsA patients in routine care from 12 European registries were pooled. Heterogeneity in baseline characteristics between registries were explored (analysis of variance and pairwise comparison). Retention rates (Kaplan–Meier), clinical remission [28-joint count DAS (DAS28) <2.6; 28 joint Disease Activity index for Psoriatic Arthritis ⩽4] and ACR criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20)/ACR50/ACR70 were calculated, including LUNDEX adjustment.
Results
Overall, 14 261 patients with PsA initiated a first TNFi. Considerable heterogeneity of baseline characteristics between registries was observed. The median 12-month retention rate (95% CI) was 77% (76, 78%), ranging from 68 to 90% across registries. Overall, DAS28/28 joint Disease Activity index for Psoriatic Arthritis remission rates at 6 months were 56%/27% (LUNDEX: 45%/22%). Six-month ACR20/50/70 responses were 53%/38%/22%, respectively. In patients initiating a first TNFi after 2009 with registered fulfilment of ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria (n = 1980) or registered one or more swollen joint at baseline (n = 5803), the retention rates and response rates were similar to those found overall.
Conclusion
Approximately half of >14 000 patients with PsA who initiated first TNFi treatment in routine care were in DAS28 remission after 6 months, and three-quarters were still on the drug after 1 year. Considerable heterogeneity in baseline characteristics and outcomes across registries was observed. The feasibility of creating a large European database of PsA patients treated in routine care was demonstrated, offering unique opportunities for research with real-world data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilie Heegaard Brahe
- EuroSpA Coordinating Center, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
- DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg
- EuroSpA Coordinating Center, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
- DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Lennart Jacobsson
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Michael J Nissen
- Department of Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Herman Mann
- Institute of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Maria José Santos
- Reuma.pt registry and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Dan Nordström
- ROB-FIN Registry, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ziga Rotar
- biorx.si and the Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia, Ljubljana
| | - Bjorn Gudbjornsson
- Centre for Rheumatology Research, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Fatos Onen
- TURKBIO Registry and Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Catalin Codreanu
- Center of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ulf Lindström
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Burkhard Möller
- Leitender Arzt der Universitätsklinik für Rheumatologie, Immunologie und Allergologie Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tore K Kvien
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karel Pavelka
- Institute of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anabela Barcelos
- Rheuma.pt registry, Rheumatology Department—Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga and Ibimed—Institute for Biomedicine, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | | | - Kari K Eklund
- Inflammation Center, Department of Rheumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Matija Tomšič
- biorx.si and the Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia, Ljubljana
| | - Thorvardur Jon Love
- University of Iceland, Faculty of Medicine, and Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Gercek Can
- TURKBIO Registry and Division of Rheumatology, School of Medicine Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ruxandra Ionescu
- Center of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- DANBIO Registry, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - I E van der Horst-Bruinsma
- Amsterdam Rheumatology & immunology Center (ARC), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam
- Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gary J Macfarlane
- Epidemiology Group, School of Medicine, Medical Science and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Florenzo Iannone
- GISEA registry, Rheumatology Unit – DETO, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Lise Hejl Hyldstrup
- EuroSpA Coordinating Center, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
| | | | - Mikkel Østergaard
- EuroSpA Coordinating Center, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- EuroSpA Coordinating Center, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lindström U, Glintborg B, Di Giuseppe D, Nordström D, Aarrestad Provan S, Gudbjornsson B, Askling J, Lund Hetland M, Aaltonen K, Krogh NS, Geirsson AJ, Jacobsson LTH. Treatment retention of infliximab and etanercept originators versus their corresponding biosimilars: Nordic collaborative observational study of 2334 biologics naïve patients with spondyloarthritis. RMD Open 2019; 5:e001079. [PMID: 31749988 PMCID: PMC6827791 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Although clinical trials support equivalence of originator products and biosimilars for etanercept and infliximab, real-world studies among biologics-naïve patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) are lacking. The objectives were to compare treatment retention in biologics-naïve patients with SpA starting either the originator product or a biosimilar of infliximab and etanercept, and to explore the baseline characteristics of these patients. Methods Patients with SpA (ankylosing spondylitis/non-radiographical axial SpA/undifferentiated SpA), starting infliximab or etanercept as their first-ever biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug during January 2014–June 2017 were identified in five Nordic biologics–rheumatology registers. Baseline characteristics were retrieved from each registry; comorbidity data were identified through linkage to national health registers. Country-specific data were pooled, and data on infliximab and etanercept were analysed separately. Comparisons of treatment retention between originators and biosimilars were assessed through survival probability curves, retention rates (2 years for infliximab/1 year for etanercept) and Hazard Ratios (HR). Results We included 1319 patients starting infliximab (24% originator/76% biosimilar), and 1015 patients starting etanercept (49% originator/51% biosimilar). Baseline characteristics were largely similar for the patients treated with the originators compared with the corresponding biosimilars. Survival probability curves were highly similar for the originator and its biosimilar, as were retention rates: infliximab 2-year retention originator, 44% (95% CI 38% to 50%)/biosimilar, 46% (95% CI: 42% to 51%); and etanercept 1-year retention originator, 66% (95% CI 61% to 70%)/biosimilar, 73% (95% CI 68% to 78%). HRs were not statistically significant. Conclusion This observational study of biologics-naïve patients with SpA from five Nordic countries showed similar baseline characteristics and very similar retention rates in patients treated with originators versus biosimilars, for both infliximab and etanercept, indicating comparable effectiveness in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulf Lindström
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Bente Glintborg
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniela Di Giuseppe
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dan Nordström
- Department of Medicine, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Bjorn Gudbjornsson
- Centre for Rheumatology Research, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Johan Askling
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kalle Aaltonen
- Pharmaceuticals Pricing Board, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | | - Lennart T H Jacobsson
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ørnbjerg LM, Brahe CH, Askling J, Ciurea A, Mann H, Onen F, Kristianslund EK, Nordström D, Santos MJ, Codreanu C, Gómez-Reino J, Rotar Z, Gudbjornsson B, Di Giuseppe D, Nissen MJ, Pavelka K, Birlik M, Kvien T, Eklund KK, Barcelos A, Ionescu R, Sanchez-Piedra C, Tomsic M, Geirsson ÁJ, Loft AG, van der Horst-Bruinsma I, Jones G, Iannone F, Hyldstrup L, Krogh NS, Hetland ML, Østergaard M. Treatment response and drug retention rates in 24 195 biologic-naïve patients with axial spondyloarthritis initiating TNFi treatment: routine care data from 12 registries in the EuroSpA collaboration. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78:1536-1544. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
ObjectiveTo study drug retention and response rates in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) initiating a first tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi).MethodsData from 12 European registries, prospectively collected in routine care, were pooled. TNFi retention rates (Kaplan-Meier statistics), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) Inactive disease (<1.3), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) <40 mm and Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society responses (ASAS 20/40) were assessed at 6, 12 and 24 months.ResultsA first TNFi was initiated in 24 195 axSpA patients. Heterogeneity of baseline characteristics between registries was observed. Twelve-month retention was 80% (95% CI 79% to 80%), ranging from 71% to 94% across registries. At 6 months, ASDAS Inactive disease/BASDAI<40 rates were 33%/72% (LUNDEX-adjusted: 27%/59%), ASAS 20/40 response rates 64%/49% (LUNDEX-adjusted 52%/40%). In patients initiating first TNFi after 2009, 6097 patients was registered to fulfil ASAS criteria for axSpA, 2935 was registered to fulfil modified New York Criteria for Ankylosing Spondylitis and 1178 patients was registered as having non-radiographic axSpA. In nr-axSpA patients, we observed lower 12-month retention rates (73% (70%–76%)) and lower 6-month LUNDEX adjusted response rates (ASDAS Inactive disease/BASDAI40 20%/50%, ASAS 20/40 45%/33%). For patients initiating first TNFi after 2014, 12-month retention rate, but not 6-month response rate, was numerically higher compared with patients initiating TNFi in 2009–2014.ConclusionA large European database of patients with axSpA initiating a first TNFi treatment in routine care, demonstrated that 27% of patients achieved ASDAS inactive disease after 6 months, while 59% achieved BASDAI <40. Four of five patients continued treatment after 1 year.
Collapse
|
38
|
Palsson O, Love TJ, Gunnarsdottir AI, Gunnarsson PS, Runarsdottir EE, Krogh NS, Gudbjornsson B. Patients with psoriatic arthritis who are not eligible for randomised controlled trials for TNF inhibitors have treatment response and drug survival similar to those who are eligible. RMD Open 2019; 5:e000984. [PMID: 31413869 PMCID: PMC6667974 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Revised: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 06/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To determine in a retrospective cohort whether patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who would not have fulfilled the inclusion criteria for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for the TNF inhibitor (TNFi) chosen for their treatment (excl) have similar benefits and drug survival as those patients who would have (incl). Methods All patients with rheumatic disorders who are treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Iceland are registered in ICEBIO. On 1 February 2016, 329 individuals with PsA were registered in ICEBIO, of whom 231 had data available for their first start of TNFi and could be evaluated according to the inclusion criteria of the respective RCTs. Disease activity was collected at baseline using Visual Analogue Scale (pain, fatigue and global (patient and physician) assessments), swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC), Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Treatment response was measured at 6 and 18 months according to American College of Rheumatology response criteria, DAS28-CRP and Disease Activity Score in Psoriatic Arthritis for 28 joints. Drug survival rate was also analysed. Results The demographics of these two groups were similar at baseline, although the incl group had higher SJC (5.5 vs 3.8) and subsequently higher DAS28-CRP (4.6 vs 4.2). While a larger change in disease activity was observed in the incl group with respect to HAQ and SJC, both groups had similar disease activity at follow-up. Drug survival was similar in both groups. Conclusions Patients with PsA who would not have fulfilled the inclusion criteria in RCTs reach similar disease activity scores at follow-up of 6 and 18 months and have similar drug survival as those patients who would have been included in RCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olafur Palsson
- Centre for Rheumatology Research, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Thorvardur Jon Love
- Department of Science and Research, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Anna Ingibjorg Gunnarsdottir
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Hospital Pharmacy, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Petur Sigurdur Gunnarsson
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Hospital Pharmacy, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | | | - Bjorn Gudbjornsson
- Centre for Rheumatology Research, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hendricks O, Andersen TE, Christiansen AA, Primdahl J, Hauge EM, Ellingsen T, Horsted TI, Bachmann AG, Loft AG, Bojesen AB, Østergaard M, Lund Hetland M, Krogh NS, Roessler KK, Petersen KH. Efficacy and safety of cannabidiol followed by an open label add-on of tetrahydrocannabinol for the treatment of chronic pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis: protocol for a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028197. [PMID: 31167870 PMCID: PMC6561449 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are chronic, systemic, inflammatory diseases, primarily in the musculoskeletal system. Pain and fatigue are key symptoms of RA and AS. Treatment presents a clinical challenge for several reasons, including the progressive nature of the diseases and the involvement of multiple pain mechanisms. Moreover, side effects of pain treatment pose an implicit risk. Currently, no well-controlled studies have investigated how medical cannabis affects pain and cognitive functions in RA and AS. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of medical cannabis in the treatment of persistent pain in patients with RA and AS with low disease activity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled study of cannabidiol (CBD), followed by an open label add-on of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) with collection of clinical data and biological materials in RA and AS patients treated in routine care. The oral treatment with CBD in the experimental group is compared with placebo in a control group for 12 weeks, followed by an observational 12-week period with an open label add-on of THC in the primary CBD non-responders. Disease characteristics, psychological parameters, demographics, comorbidities, lifestyle factors, blood samples and serious adverse events are collected at baseline, after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, and at a follow-up visit at 36 weeks. Data will be analysed in accordance with a predefined statistical analysis plan. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Danish Ethics Committee (S-20170217), the Danish Medicines Agency (S-2018010018) and the Danish Data Protection Agency approved the protocol. The project is registered in the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT 2017-004226-15). All participants will give written informed consent to participate prior to any study-related procedures. The results will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Hendricks
- Rheumatology, Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, Denmark
- IRS, Syddansk Universitet Det Naturvidenskabelige Fakultet, Odense, Denmark
| | - Tonny Elmose Andersen
- Department of Psychology, Syddansk Universitet Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet, Odense, Denmark
| | - Afshin Ashouri Christiansen
- Rheumatology, Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, Denmark
- IRS, Syddansk Universitet Det Naturvidenskabelige Fakultet, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jette Primdahl
- Rheumatology, Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, Syddansk Universitet Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Anja Godske Bachmann
- Rheumatology, Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, Denmark
- IRS, Syddansk Universitet Det Naturvidenskabelige Fakultet, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus Universitet Health, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anders Bo Bojesen
- Rheumatology, Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Department of Rheumatology, COPECARE, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Department of Rheumatology, COPECARE, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Niels Steen Krogh
- Department of Rheumatology, COPECARE, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Kaya Roessler
- Department of Psychology, Syddansk Universitet Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet, Odense, Denmark
| | - Kim Hørslev Petersen
- Rheumatology, Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, Denmark
- IRS, Syddansk Universitet Det Naturvidenskabelige Fakultet, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Møller-Bisgaard S, Hørslev-Petersen K, Ejbjerg B, Hetland ML, Ørnbjerg LM, Glinatsi D, Møller J, Boesen M, Christensen R, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Madsen OR, Jensen B, Villadsen JA, Hauge EM, Bennett P, Hendricks O, Asmussen K, Kowalski M, Lindegaard H, Nielsen SM, Bliddal H, Krogh NS, Ellingsen T, Nielsen AH, Balding L, Jurik AG, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M. Effect of Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Conventional Treat-to-Target Strategies on Disease Activity Remission and Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The IMAGINE-RA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019; 321:461-472. [PMID: 30721294 PMCID: PMC6440221 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.21362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Whether using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to guide treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) improves disease activity and slows joint damage progression is unknown. OBJECTIVE To determine whether an MRI-guided treat-to-target strategy vs a conventional clinical treat-to-target strategy improves outcomes in patients with RA in clinical remission. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Two-year, randomized, multicenter trial conducted at 9 hospitals in Denmark. Two hundred patients with RA in clinical remission (disease activity score in 28 joints-C-reactive protein [DAS28-CRP] <3.2 and no swollen joints) were enrolled between April 2012 and June 2015. The final follow-up visit was April 2017. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to an MRI-guided vs a conventional treat-to-target strategy. In the MRI-guided group, the treatment goal was absence of MRI bone marrow edema combined with clinical remission, defined as DAS28-CRP of 3.2 or less and no swollen joints. In the conventional group, the treatment goal was clinical remission. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Co-primary outcomes were proportions of patients achieving DAS28-CRP remission (DAS28-CRP <2.6) and with no radiographic progression (no increase in total van der Heijde-modified Sharp score) at 24 months. Significance testing for the primary outcome was based on 1-sided testing. Secondary outcomes were clinical and MRI measures of disease activity, physical function, and quality of life. RESULTS Of 200 patients randomized (133 women [67%]; mean [SD] age, 61.6 [10.5] years; median baseline DAS28-CRP, 1.9 [interquartile range, 1.7-2.2]; van der Heijde-modified Sharp score, 18.0 [interquartile range, 7.0-42.5]), 76 patients (76%) in the MRI-guided group and 95 (95%) in the conventional group completed the study. Of these, 64 (85%) vs 83 (88%), respectively, reached the primary clinical end point (risk difference, -4.8% [1-sided 95% CI, -13.6% to + ∞; 1-sided P = .19]) and 49 (66%) vs 58 (62%), respectively, reached the primary radiographic end point (risk difference, 4.7% [1-sided 95% CI, -7.0% to + ∞; 1-sided P = .25). Of 10 key secondary end points, 8 were null and 2 showed statistically significant benefit for the MRI treat-to-target group. Seventeen patients (17%) in the MRI-guided treat-to-target group and 6 patients (6%) in the conventional treat-to-target group experienced serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with RA in clinical remission, an MRI-guided treat-to-target strategy compared with a conventional treat-to-target strategy did not result in improved disease activity remission rates or reduce radiographic progression. These findings do not support the use of an MRI-guided strategy for treating patients with RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01656278.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Signe Møller-Bisgaard
- Department of Rheumatology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Kim Hørslev-Petersen
- Department of Rheumatology, King Christian X’s Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Graasten, Denmark
| | - Bo Ejbjerg
- Department of Rheumatology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Daniel Glinatsi
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Jakob Møller
- Department of Radiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Mikael Boesen
- Department of Radiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Robin Christensen
- Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Kristian Stengaard-Pedersen
- Department of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ole Rintek Madsen
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Bente Jensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | | | - Ellen-Margrethe Hauge
- Department of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Philip Bennett
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Oliver Hendricks
- Department of Rheumatology, King Christian X’s Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Graasten, Denmark
| | - Karsten Asmussen
- Department of Rheumatology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Marcin Kowalski
- Department of Rheumatology, Hjørring Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark
| | - Hanne Lindegaard
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sabrina Mai Nielsen
- Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Henning Bliddal
- The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Torkell Ellingsen
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Lone Balding
- Department of Radiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Anne Grethe Jurik
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Henrik S. Thomsen
- Department of Radiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Glintborg B, Loft AG, Omerovic E, Hendricks O, Linauskas A, Espesen J, Danebod K, Jensen DV, Nordin H, Dalgaard EB, Chrysidis S, Kristensen S, Raun JL, Lindegaard H, Manilo N, Jakobsen SH, Hansen IMJ, Pedersen DD, Sørensen IJ, Andersen LS, Grydehøj J, Mehnert F, Krogh NS, Lund Hetland M. Response to ''To switch or not to switch': the missing piece in the puzzle of biosimilar literature?' by Scherlinger et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 79:e37. [PMID: 30674476 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Glintborg
- The DANBIO Registry and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Glostrup, Denmark .,Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Emina Omerovic
- Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | | - Asta Linauskas
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark
| | - Jakob Espesen
- Department of Rheumatology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Kamilla Danebod
- Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Dorte Vendelbo Jensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Henrik Nordin
- Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | | | | | - Salome Kristensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Hanne Lindegaard
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Natalia Manilo
- Department of Rheumatology, Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Inge Juul Sørensen
- The DANBIO Registry and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Jolanta Grydehøj
- Department of Rheumatology, Holstebro Hospital, Holstebro, Denmark
| | - Frank Mehnert
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Grøn KL, Arkema EV, Glintborg B, Mehnert F, Østergaard M, Dreyer L, Nørgaard M, Krogh NS, Askling J, Hetland ML. Risk of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated in routine care with abatacept, rituximab and tocilizumab in Denmark and Sweden. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 78:320-327. [PMID: 30612115 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate (1) crude and age-and gender-adjusted incidence rates (IRs) of serious infections (SI) and (2) relative risks (RR) of SI in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating treatment with abatacept, rituximab or tocilizumab in routine care. METHODS This is an observational cohort study conducted in parallel in Denmark and Sweden including patients with RA in Denmark (DANBIO) and Sweden (Anti-Rheumatic Treatment in Sweden Register/Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register) who started abatacept/rituximab/tocilizumab in 2010-2015. Patients could contribute to more than one treatment course. Incident SI (hospitalisations listing infection) and potential confounders were identified through linkage to national registries. Age- and gender-adjusted IRs of SI per 100 person years and additionally adjusted RRs of SI during 0-12 and 0-24 months since start of treatment were assessed (Poisson regression). Country-specific RRs were pooled using inverse variance weighting. RESULTS We identified 8987 treatment courses (abatacept: 2725; rituximab: 3363; tocilizumab: 2899). At treatment start, rituximab-treated patients were older, had longer disease duration and more previous malignancies; tocilizumab-treated patients had higher C reactive protein. During 0-12 and 0-24 months of follow-up, 456 and 639 SI events were identified, respectively. The following were the age- and gender-adjusted 12-month IRs for abatacept/rituximab/tocilizumab: 7.1/8.1/6.1 for Denmark and 6.0/6.4/4.7 for Sweden. The 24-month IRs were 6.1/7.5/5.2 for Denmark and 5.6/5.8/4.3 for Sweden. Adjusted 12-month RRs for tocilizumab versus rituximab were 0.82 (0.50 to 1.36) for Denmark and 0.76 (0.57 to 1.02) for Sweden, pooled 0.78 (0.61 to 1.01); for abatacept versus rituximab 0.94 (0.55 to 1.60) for Denmark and 0.86 (0.66 to 1.13) for Sweden, pooled 0.88 (0.69 to 1.12); and for abatacept versus tocilizumab 1.15 (0.69 to 1.90) for Denmark and 1.14 (0.83 to 1.55) for Sweden, pooled 1.13 (0.91 to 1.42). The adjusted RRs for 0-24 months were similar. CONCLUSION For patients starting abatacept, rituximab or tocilizumab, differences in baseline characteristics were seen. Numerical differences in IR of SI between drugs were observed. RRs seemed to vary with drug (tocilizumab < abatacept < rituximab) but should be interpreted with caution due to few events and risk of residual confounding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrine Lederballe Grøn
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark .,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Bente Glintborg
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Frank Mehnert
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lene Dreyer
- Departments of Clinical Medicine and Rheumatology, Aalborg University and Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Mette Nørgaard
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Johan Askling
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Glintborg B, Loft AG, Omerovic E, Hendricks O, Linauskas A, Espesen J, Danebod K, Jensen DV, Nordin H, Dalgaard EB, Chrysidis S, Kristensen S, Raun JL, Lindegaard H, Manilo N, Jakobsen SH, Hansen IMJ, Dalsgaard Pedersen D, Sørensen IJ, Andersen LS, Grydehøj J, Mehnert F, Krogh NS, Hetland ML. Response to: ‘Mandatory, cost-driven switching from originator etanercept to its biosimilar SB4: possible fallout on non-medical switching’ by Cantini and Benucci. Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 79:e14. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|
44
|
Secher AE, Glintborg B, Gudbergsen H, Krogh NS, Sørensen IJ, Jensen DV, Christensen R, Skougaard M, Pedersen PL, Hetland ML. Comparing patient-reported outcomes entered at home versus at hospital, and testing touch screens for initial recruitment to scientific trials in arthritis patients. Scand J Rheumatol 2018; 48:178-184. [PMID: 30444168 DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2018.1522666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Touch screens for entering patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are available at all Danish departments of rheumatology reporting to the nationwide DANBIO registry. This project comprises two substudies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), aiming to (A) investigate the feasibility of first line patient recruitment for research via touch screens, and (B) compare PROs collected at hospital versus at home, including patient preferences. METHOD Substudy A: using a touch screen, patients answered whether we could contact them about a clinical research project (yes/no). Characteristics of patients who accepted/declined were explored using chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Substudy B (randomized crossover agreement study): a random sample of patients from the accepting group in substudy A was contacted by telephone. According to prespecified power and sample size estimation, 56 patients were included. After randomization, 50% of patients entered PROs and information on comorbidities and lifestyle from home and then at hospital, and 50% first from hospital and then at home. Finally, they stated their preference for data entry (hospital/home/equally good). Differences in PROs entered from home and in the hospital were compared (limits of agreement, 95% confidence intervals, and intraclass correlation coefficients). RESULTS The touch-screen invitation was accepted by 428/952 patients (45%). Patients who accepted and those who declined had similar PROs and demographics. Substudy B was completed by 42 patients (22 RA, 20 AxSpA). They had no significant differences between PROs and lifestyle/comorbidity data entered from home and hospital, except for AxSpA patients on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index item 5. The preferred method of data entry was hospital (10%), home (50%), and equally good (40%). CONCLUSION Touch screens seem feasible for first line research recruitment. PROs collected from home were similar to the touch-screen solution. Patients preferred data entry from home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A E Secher
- a The Danish Rheumatologic Database (DANBIO) and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet , Glostrup , Denmark
| | - B Glintborg
- a The Danish Rheumatologic Database (DANBIO) and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet , Glostrup , Denmark.,b Department of Rheumatology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - H Gudbergsen
- c The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals , Frederiksberg , Denmark
| | | | - I J Sørensen
- a The Danish Rheumatologic Database (DANBIO) and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet , Glostrup , Denmark
| | - D V Jensen
- a The Danish Rheumatologic Database (DANBIO) and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet , Glostrup , Denmark.,b Department of Rheumatology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - R Christensen
- c The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals , Frederiksberg , Denmark.,e Department of Rheumatology , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
| | - M Skougaard
- c The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals , Frederiksberg , Denmark
| | | | - M L Hetland
- a The Danish Rheumatologic Database (DANBIO) and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet , Glostrup , Denmark.,g Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Glintborg B, Loft AG, Omerovic E, Hendricks O, Linauskas A, Espesen J, Danebod K, Jensen DV, Nordin H, Dalgaard EB, Chrysidis S, Kristensen S, Raun JL, Lindegaard H, Manilo N, Jakobsen SH, Hansen IMJ, Dalsgaard Pedersen D, Sørensen IJ, Andersen LS, Grydehøj J, Mehnert F, Krogh NS, Hetland ML. To switch or not to switch: results of a nationwide guideline of mandatory switching from originator to biosimilar etanercept. One-year treatment outcomes in 2061 patients with inflammatory arthritis from the DANBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 78:192-200. [PMID: 30396903 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Revised: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Real-world evidence on effectiveness of switching to biosimila r etanercept is scarce. In Denmark, a nationwide guideline of mandatory switch from 50 mg originator (ETA) to biosimilar (SB4) etanercept was issued for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) in 2016. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were studied in ETA-treated patients, who switched to SB4 (switchers) or maintained ETA (non-switchers). Retention rates were compared with that of a historic cohort of ETA-treated patients. Switchers who resumed ETA treatment (back-switchers) were characterised. METHODS Observational cohort study based on the DANBIO registry. Treatment retention was explored by Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression (crude, adjusted). RESULTS 1621 (79%) of 2061 ETA-treated patients switched to SB4. Disease activity was unchanged 3 months' preswitch/postswitch. Non-switchers often received 25 mg ETA (ETA 25 mg pens/syringes and powder solution were still available). One-year adjusted retention rates were: non-switchers: 77% (95% CI: 72% to 82%)/switchers: 83% (79% to 87%)/historic cohort: 90% (88% to 92%). Patients not in remission had lower retention rates than patients in remission, both in switchers (crude HR 1.7 (1.3 to 2.2)) and non-switchers (2.4 (1.7 to 3.6)). During follow-up, 120 patients (7% of switchers) back-switched to ETA. Back-switchers' clinical characteristics were similar to switchers, and reasons for SB4 withdrawal were mainly subjective. CONCLUSION Seventy-nine per cent of patients switched from ETA to SB4. After 1 year, adjusted treatment retention rates were lower in switchers versus the historic ETA cohort, but higher than in non-switchers. Withdrawal was more common in patients not in remission. The results suggest that switch outcomes in routine care are affected by patient-related factors and non-specific drug effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Glintborg
- The DANBIO registry and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark .,Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Emina Omerovic
- Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | | - Asta Linauskas
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark
| | - Jakob Espesen
- Department of Rheumatology, Vejle Hospital Lillebælt, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Kamilla Danebod
- Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Dorte Vendelbo Jensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Henrik Nordin
- Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | | | | | - Salome Kristensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Hanne Lindegaard
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Natalia Manilo
- Department of Rheumatology, Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Inge Juul Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,The DANBIO registry and COPECARE, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | | - Jolanta Grydehøj
- Department of Rheumatology, Holstebro hospital, Holstebro, Denmark
| | - Frank Mehnert
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,The DANBIO registry and COPECARE, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Michelsen B, Sexton J, Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Krogh NS, van der Heijde D, Kvien TK, Hetland ML. Can disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis be adequately assessed by a modified Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) based on 28 joints? Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 77:1736-1741. [PMID: 30237203 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2018] [Revised: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test the psychometric performance of a modified Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) using 28 instead of 66 swollen/68 tender joint counts (SJC/TJC). METHODS We included patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) from the Danish national quality registry DANBIO, divided into examination (n=3157 patients, 23987 visits) and validation cohorts (n=3154 patients, 24160 visits). We defined DAPSA28 = (28TJC × conversion factor1) + (28SJC × conversion factor2) + patient global (0-10VAS) + pain (0-10VAS) + C reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dL). Identification of the conversion factors was performed by generalised estimating equations in the examination cohort and evaluation of criterion, correlational and construct validity in the validation cohort. RESULTS We estimated DAPSA28 = (28TJC × 1.6) + (28SJC × 1.6) + patient global (0-10VAS) + pain (0-10VAS) + CRP (mg/dL). Criterion validity: DAPSA/DAPSA28 had comparable discriminative power expressed as standardised mean difference (DAPSA, 0.90; DAPSA28, 0.93) to distinguish between patients in high and low disease activity. Kappa with quadratic weighting of DAPSA/DAPSA28 disease activity states was high: 0.92 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.92). Standardised response means for DAPSA/DAPSA28 were -0.96/-0.92 for visits after biological DMARD-initiation. Correlational validity: Baseline DAPSA/DAPSA28 had high correlation with 28-joint disease activity score with CRP (r=0.87/r=0.93), simplified disease activity index (r=0.92/r=0.99), p<0.001. Bland-Altman plot showed better agreement between DAPSA/DAPSA28 for low than high disease activity. Construct validity: DAPSA/DAPSA28 were similarly correlated to Health Assessment Questionnaire; r=0.60/0.62, p<0.001. DAPSA/DAPSA28 discriminated patients reporting their symptom state as acceptable versus not acceptable equally well: mean (SD) 9.1 (8.7)/8.4 (8.0) and 24.2 (14.9)/22.5 (13.8), respectively. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that data sets with only 28-joint counts available can be used to calculate DAPSA28, especially in patients with low disease activity. DAPSA28 showed good criterion, correlational and construct validity and sensitivity to change. Still, our results support that 66/68 joint count should be performed and the original DAPSA should be preferred in PsA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigitte Michelsen
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway .,Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of Southern Norway Trust, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Joseph Sexton
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna and Lainz Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna and Lainz Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Désirée van der Heijde
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tore K Kvien
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- DANBIO, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hetland ML, Østergaard M, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Junker P, Ejbjerg B, Jacobsen S, Ellingsen T, Lindegaard H, Pødenphant J, Vestergaard A, Jurik AG, Krogh NS, Hørslev-Petersen K. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, 28-joint Disease Activity Score, and magnetic resonance imaging bone oedema at baseline predict 11 years’ functional and radiographic outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 2018; 48:1-8. [DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2018.1466362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- ML Hetland
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- DANBIO registry, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - M Østergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - P Junker
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - B Ejbjerg
- Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - S Jacobsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - T Ellingsen
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - H Lindegaard
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - J Pødenphant
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - A Vestergaard
- Department of Radiology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - AG Jurik
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - NS Krogh
- ZiteLab ApS, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - K Hørslev-Petersen
- King Christian X’s Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University of Southern Denmark, Gråsten, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Glintborg B, Lindström U, Aaltonen K, Kristianslund EK, Gudbjornsson B, Chatzidionysiou K, Askling J, Nordström D, Hetland ML, Di Giuseppe D, Dreyer L, Kristensen LE, Jørgensen TS, Eklund K, Grondal G, Ernestam S, Joensuu J, Törmänen MRK, Skydsgaard H, Hagfors J, Kvien TK, Lie E, Fagerli K, Geirsson AJ, Jonsson H, Provan SA, Krogh NS, Jacobsson LTH. Biological treatment in ankylosing spondylitis in the Nordic countries during 2010–2016: a collaboration between five biological registries. Scand J Rheumatol 2018; 47:465-474. [DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2018.1444199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- B Glintborg
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte Hospital, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - U Lindström
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - K Aaltonen
- Pharmaceuticals Pricing Board, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - EK Kristianslund
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - B Gudbjornsson
- Centre for Rheumatology Research, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - K Chatzidionysiou
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Askling
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Nordström
- Department of Medicine, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - ML Hetland
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - D Di Giuseppe
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Dreyer
- Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte Hospital, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - LE Kristensen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - TS Jørgensen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - K Eklund
- Department of Rheumatology, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - G Grondal
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - S Ernestam
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Joensuu
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki,Finland
| | - MRK Törmänen
- Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - H Skydsgaard
- The Danish Rheumatism Association, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J Hagfors
- Norwegian Rheumatism Association, Oslo, Norway
| | - TK Kvien
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - E Lie
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - K Fagerli
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - AJ Geirsson
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - H Jonsson
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - SA Provan
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - LTH Jacobsson
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hammer NM, Midtgaard J, Hetland ML, Krogh NS, Esbensen BA. Physical activity behaviour in men with inflammatory joint disease: a cross-sectional register-based study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018; 57:803-812. [PMID: 29390089 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Physical activity is recommended as an essential part of the non-pharmacological management of inflammatory joint disease, but previous research in this area has predominantly included women. The aim of this study was to examine physical activity behaviour in men with inflammatory joint disease. Methods The study was conducted as a cross-sectional register-based study. Data on physical activity behaviour in men with RA, PsA and AS were matched with sociodemographic and clinical variables extracted from the DANBIO registry. Logistic regression analyses using multiple imputations were performed to investigate demographic and clinical variables associated with regular engagement in physical activity (moderate-vigorous ⩾2 h/week). Descriptive statistics were applied to explore motivation, barriers and preferences for physical activity. Results A total of 325 men were included of whom 129 (40%) engaged in regular physical activity. In univariate analyses, higher age, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, VAS fatigue, VAS patient's global, CRP level, disease activity, functional disability and current smoking were negatively associated with regular engagement in physical activity. In the final multivariable regression model only a high VAS fatigue score (⩾61 mm) (OR = 0.228; CI: 0.119, 0.436) remained significantly independently associated with regular physical activity. Conclusion A majority of men with inflammatory joint disease do not meet the recommendations of regular physical activity. Both sociodemographic and clinical parameters were associated with engagement in physical activity, and fatigue especially seems to play a pivotal role in explaining suboptimal physical activity behaviour in this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nanna Maria Hammer
- The DANBIO Registry and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Julie Midtgaard
- The University Hospitals Centre for Health Research (UCSF), Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- The DANBIO Registry and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Bente Appel Esbensen
- The DANBIO Registry and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gudbjornsson B, Geirsson AJ, Krogh NS. Low starting dosage of infliximab with possible escalating dosage in psoriatic arthritis gives the same treatment results as standard dosage of adalimumab or etanercept: results from the nationwide Icelandic ICEBIO registry. Psoriasis (Auckl) 2018; 8:13-19. [PMID: 29765870 PMCID: PMC5942167 DOI: 10.2147/ptt.s161522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective To explore differences in response to a low dosage regimen of infliximab with an escalating dosage in comparison to a standard dosage of etanercept and adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods Biologically naïve PsA patients who were beginning anti-TNF-α therapy were selected from the ICEBIO registry. Demographics and clinical differences were compared in four treatment groups: infliximab <4 mg/kg; infliximab >4 mg/kg; etanercept or adalimumab at baseline and on follow-up (6 and 12 months, last visit). The Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test was used for comparison of the groups and the Wilcoxon test to compare the two infliximab dosage regimens. Results One hundred and eighty-five patients (61% female) were identified; 84 patients received infliximab, 66 etanercept, and 35 adalimumab. A total of 19% of the patients treated with infliximab escalated their dosage ≥4 mg/kg. No significant differences were observed at baseline in respect to visual analog scale (VAS) pain, VAS fatigue, Health Assessment Questionnaire, C-reactive protein (CRP), numbers of swollen or tender joints, or Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28-CRP values. A similar treatment response was observed in all four treatment groups on follow-up. Conclusion In respect to treatment effects, a low dosage of infliximab with possible escalating dosage is acceptable for the majority of PsA patients who are in need of biological treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjorn Gudbjornsson
- Centre for Rheumatology Research, University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Arni Jon Geirsson
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Laeknasetrid - Medical Clinic, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | |
Collapse
|