Effect of work-hour restrictions and resident turnover in orthopedic trauma

Systematic Review of the Impact of Physician Work Schedules on Patient Safety with Meta-Analyses of Mortality Risk

Resident physician work hour limits continue to be controversial. Numerous trials have come to conflicting conclusions about the impact on patient safety of eliminating extended duration work shifts. We conducted meta-analyses to evaluate the impact of work hour policies and work schedules on patient safety. After identifying 8,362 potentially relevant studies and reviewing 688 full-text articles, 132 studies were retained and graded on quality of evidence. Of these, 68 studies provided enough information for consideration in meta-analyses. We found that patient safety improved following implementation of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's 2003 and 2011 resident physicians work hour guidelines. Limiting all resident physicians to 80-hour work weeks and 28-hour shifts in 2003 was associated with an 11% reduction in mortality (p < 0.001). Limited shift durations and shorter work weeks were also associated with improved patient safety in clinical trials and observational studies not specifically tied to policy changes. Given the preponderance of evidence showing that patient and physician safety is negatively affected by long work hours, efforts to improve physician schedules should be prioritized. Policies that enable extended-duration shifts and long work weeks should be reexamined. Further research should expand beyond resident physicians to additional study populations, including attending physicians and other health care workers.

Fellow Involvement in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is There an "August Effect?"

The purpose of this study is to determine if a fellow's involvement, as well as duration of a fellow's training, impacts complications, outcomes, and survivorship in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A retrospective review identified 2,790 consecutive patients (3,530 knees) who underwent primary TKA between 2003 and 2008. A 2-year minimum follow-up was available on 2,785 knees (2,195 patients). Operative data, clinical outcomes, complications, and survivorship were compared between cases with and without a fellow involved as well as comparing cases in the first quarter (Q1) of the academic year to the last three quarters (Q2-4). Mean follow-up was 9.7 years. Fellows were involved in 1,434 (41%) surgeries. Fellow cases had significantly longer tourniquet times (59.5 vs. 49 minutes, p < 0.001) and operative times (82.4 vs. 70.8 minutes, p < 0.001). Overall, there was no difference in clinical, functional, or pain outcomes between attending and fellow cases. Fellow cases during Q1 had significantly worse pain scores (p = 0.009) and clinical scores (p < 0.001). Revision rate, infection rates, and survivorship were not significantly different between fellow and attendings or during Q1 of fellowship compared with attendings. Primary TKA survivorship and complications were not affected by fellow involvement or academic quarter. An "August Effect" may be suggested for clinical and pain outcomes in the first 3 months of fellowship.

Does a "July Effect" Exist for Fellowship Training in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

The hypothetical association between health-care errors and the transition of the medical academic year has been termed the "July effect." Data supporting its existence are conflicting, particularly in orthopedic surgery, and prior studies have inappropriately grouped fellows with resident trainees. No studies to date have examined whether a training initiation effect exists among surgical fellows in adult reconstructive orthopedics.

METHODS

This is a level IV retrospective cohort study reviewing 15,650 primary hip and knee arthroplasties performed from 2006 to 2016 at a single institution. Forty arthroplasty fellows were trained during this 10-year period. Primary outcome measures included intraoperative complications, additional procedures, revisions, and nonoperative complications within 90 days of surgery. These complication rates were analyzed by quarter of academic year and by temporal progression through three-month fellowship rotations.

RESULTS

There were no differences in intraoperative complication, revision, or nonoperative complication rates between any academic quarter. There was a single statistically lower rate of additional procedures in the third quarter (1.2%) than in the fourth quarter (1.8%, P = .04). The most common complication in this subset was wound dehiscence for patients undergoing hip arthroplasty and stiffness for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. There was no difference in complication rates during the first, second, or third month as fellows progressed through a single rotation.

CONCLUSION

This study does not support the existence of a training-initiation effect among fellows in adult hip and knee reconstruction. Graduated autonomy can be safely employed in a fellowship program without negatively impacting patient outcomes, ensuring the continued high-caliber training of future surgeons.

Associations Between In-Hospital Mortality, Health Care Utilization, and Inpatient Costs With the 2011 Resident Duty Hour Revision

BACKGROUND

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has mandated revisions to residents' work hours to improve patient safety and enhance resident education and wellness. The impact on clinical outcomes on a national level is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

We examined data from before and after the ACGME 2011 duty hour revision and looked for differences between teaching and nonteaching US hospitals.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of patients admitted to hospitals in the 2-year periods before and after the 2011 duty hour revision was conducted, utilizing a nationally representative data set. We compared patient and hospital characteristics using standardized differences. With nonteaching hospitals serving as the control group, we used multiple group interrupted time series segmented regression analysis to test for postrevision level and trend changes in mortality, length of stay (LOS), and costs.

RESULTS

We examined more than 117 million hospitalizations. At teaching and nonteaching hospitals, trends in mortality and LOS in prerevision and postrevision periods were not significantly different (all P > .05). A significant monthly reduction in cost per hospitalization was noted postrevision at teaching hospitals (P = .019) but not at nonteaching hospitals (P = .62). In the 2 years following the 2011 revision, there was a monthly reduction in cost per hospitalization (-$52.28; 95% confidence interval -$116.90 to -$12.32; P = .026) at teaching relative to nonteaching hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in mortality or LOS between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. However, there was a small decrease in cost per hospitalization at teaching hospitals following the 2011 revision.

Variation in National ACGME Case Log Data for Pediatric Orthopaedic Fellowships: Are Fellow Coding Practices Responsible?

BACKGROUND

The introduction of the 80-hour work week for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited fellowship programs initiated many efforts to optimize surgical training. One particular area of interest is on recording and tracking surgical experiences. The current standard is logging cases based on Current Procedural Terminology codes, which are primarily designed for billing. Proposed guidelines from the ACGME regarding logging exist, but their implementation is unknown, as is the variation in case volume across fellowship programs. The purpose of this study was to investigate variability in the national case log data, and explore potential sources of variation using fellow surveys.

METHODS

National ACGME case log data for pediatric orthopaedic fellowships from 2012 to 2015 were reviewed, with particular attention to the domains of spine, pelvis/hip, arthroscopy, trauma, and other (which includes clubfoot casting). To explore potential sources of case log variability, a survey on case logging behavior was distributed to all pediatric orthopaedic fellows for the academic year 2015 to 2016.

RESULTS

Reported experiences based on ACGME case logs varied widely between fellows with percentage difference of up to 100% in all areas. Similarly, wide variability is present in coding practices of pediatric orthopaedic fellows, who often lack formal education on the topic of appropriate coding/logging. In the survey, hypothetical case scenarios had an absolute difference in recorded codes of up to 13 and a percentage difference of up to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

ACGME case log data for pediatric orthopaedic fellowships demonstrates wide variability in reported surgical experiences. This variability may be due, in part, to differences in logging practices by individual fellows. This observation makes meaningful interpretation of national data on surgical volume challenging. Proposed surgical experience minimums should be interpreted in light of these data, and may not be advisable unless accompanied by standardized and specific guidelines for case log entry. Efforts to optimize training in the post 80-hour era will require accurate data to serve as a starting point for future educational efforts.

Operative Intervention of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures More Complicated in July: Analysis of the July Effect

BACKGROUND

The "July Effect" involves the influx of new interns and residents early in the academic year (July and August), which may have greater potential for poorer patient outcomes. Current orthopaedic literature does not demonstrate the validity of this concept in arthroplasty, spine, hand, and arthroscopy. No study has investigated the possibility of this effect on common pediatric orthopaedic procedures, such as closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation of supracondylar humerus fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all type II or III supracondylar humerus fractures that underwent primary closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation (CPT code 24538) at a single pediatric level 1 trauma center from July 2009 to June 2013. Patients were grouped according to time in the academic year: early (July and August) and late (May and June). Demographic data included length of follow-up, age at surgery, sex, side of injury, and Wilkin's modified Gartland classification. Outcomes included length of operation, number of pins used, length of stay, complications, and the need for repeat surgery.

RESULTS

There were 245 patients, 101 in the early and 144 in the late group. There was no increase in surgical time [33.32±24.74 (early) vs. 28.63±10.06 (late) min, P=0.07) or complication rates [7.0% (early) vs. 2.1% (late), P=0.06) between the early and the late groups. Cases performed with junior residents demonstrated longer operative (31.72±17.07 vs. 28.96±18.71 min, P=0.02) and fluoroscopy (48.63±30.96 vs. 34.12±27.38 s, P=0.01) times.

CONCLUSIONS

The academic orthopaedic surgeon must ensure the education of residents, while providing the highest level of safety to patients. Our study shows that education of young residents early in the academic year results in no increase in operative times, radiation exposure, or complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

A Narrative Review of High-Quality Literature on the Effects of Resident Duty Hours Reforms

PURPOSE

To summarize current high-quality studies evaluating the effect and efficacy of resident duty hours reforms (DHRs) on patient safety and resident education and well-being.

METHOD

The authors searched PubMed and Medline in August 2012 and again in May 2013 for literature (1987-2013) about the effects of DHRs. They assessed the quality of articles using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) scoring system. They considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs), partial RCTs, and all studies with a MERSQI score ≥ 14 to be "high-quality" methodology studies.

RESULTS

A total of 72 high-quality studies met inclusion criteria. Most studies showed no change or slight improvement in mortality and complication rates after DHRs. Resident well-being was generally improved, but there was a perceived negative impact on education (knowledge acquisition, skills, and cognitive performance) following DHRs. Eleven high-quality studies assessed the impact of DHR interventions; all reported a neutral to positive impact. Seven high-quality studies assessed costs associated with DHRs and demonstrated an increase in hospital costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of most studies that allow enough time for DHR interventions to take effect suggest a benefit to patient safety and resident well-being, but the effect on the quality of training remains unknown. Additional methodologically sound studies on the impact of DHRs are necessary. Priorities for future research include approaches to optimizing education and clinical proficiency and studies on the effect of intervention strategies on both education and patient safety. Such studies will provide additional information to help improve duty hours policies.

Work Hour Reduction: Still Room for Improvement

OBJECTIVE

The effect of resident duty hour restrictions continues to yield conflicting results on patient outcomes. Failure to rescue (FTR), or death after a major complication, has become a topic of increasing quality assessment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of duty hour restrictions on in-hospital mortality, complication rates, and FTR in patients suffering traumatic injuries.

DESIGN

Data from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) were retrospectively reviewed (Research Data Set 2007-2008 and version 7.2). Patients admitted to Level I or II teaching institutions were dichotomized into pre-duty hour restriction (2002-2003) and post-duty hour restriction (2007-2008) time periods. Patients who had nonsurvivable injuries (any region Abbreviated Injury Scale score = 6), died within 48 hours, or had missing data were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for differences in patient characteristics and derive adjusted outcomes.

SETTING

Level I and II teaching institutions in the NTDB.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients with trauma admitted to a Level I or II teaching institution between January 1, 2002 and June 30, 2003 and between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2008.

RESULTS

Although overall adjusted in-hospital mortality was decreased (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.7, p < 0.001) in the post-duty hour restriction era, overall complications (AOR = 2.0, p < 0.001) and FTR (AOR = 2.0, p < 0.001) were significantly higher.

CONCLUSION

Although there may be some benefit to resident duty hour restrictions, there is still room for improvement in patient care. Individual institutions should carefully review their own complication data to identify preventable systems issues, such as poor handoffs, and opportunities for increased resident supervision.

What effects have resident work-hour changes had on education, quality of life, and safety? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

More than 15 years ago, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) identified medical error as a problem worthy of greater attention; in the wake of the IOM report, numerous changes were made to regulations to limit residents' duty hours. However, the effect of resident work-hour changes remains controversial within the field of orthopaedics.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We performed a systematic review to determine whether work-hour restrictions have measurably influenced quality-of-life measures, operative and technical skill development, resident surgical education, patient care outcomes (including mortality, morbidity, adverse events, sentinel events, complications), and surgeon and resident attitudes (such as perceived effect on learning and training experiences, personal benefit, direct clinical experience, clinical preparedness).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Google Scholar using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were any English language peer-reviewed articles that analyzed the effect(s) of orthopaedic surgery resident work-hour restrictions on patient safety, resident education, resident/surgeon quality of life, resident technical operative skill development, and resident surgeon attitudes toward work-hour restrictions. Eleven studies met study inclusion criteria. One study was a prospective analysis, whereas 10 studies were of level IV evidence (review of surgical case logs) or survey results.

RESULTS

Within our identified studies, there was some support for improved resident quality of life, improved resident sleep and less fatigue, a perceived negative impact on surgical operative and technical skill, and conflicting evidence on the topic of resident education, patient outcomes, and variable attitudes toward the work-hour changes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of high-level or clear evidence evaluating the effect of the changes to resident work hours. Future research in this area should focus on objective measures that include patient safety as a primary outcome.

The "July effect" in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: analysis of 21,434 cases from the ACS-NSQIP database

The "July effect" is the hypothetical increase in morbidity thought to be associated with the training of new residents during the first portion of the academic year. We evaluated for the presence of the July effect in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database among 21,434 patients who underwent primary total hip or knee arthroplasty. There was no association of an interaction term for academic quarter and resident involvement with "serious adverse events" (P = 0.656) or "any adverse events" (P = 0.578). As a result, this study could not demonstrate a July effect. Patients can be reassured that undergoing total joint arthroplasty during the first part of the academic year is without increased risk of adverse events related to the training of residents.

"July effect" in elective spine surgery: analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate for the presence and magnitude of the "July effect" within elective spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The July effect is the hypothetical increase in morbidity and mortality thought to be associated with the influx of new (or newly promoted) trainees during the first portion of the academic year. Studies evaluating for the presence and magnitude of the July effect have demonstrated conflicting results.

METHODS

We accessed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005-2010. Statistical analyses were conducted using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 14,986 cases met inclusion criteria and constitute the study population. Of these, 26.5% occurred in the first academic quarter and 25.3% had resident involvement. The rate of serious adverse events was 1.9 times higher and the rate of any adverse events was 1.6 times higher among cases with resident involvement than among those without (P < 0.001 for both). Among cases without resident involvement, the rates of serious adverse events and any adverse events did not differ by academic quarter. Similarly, among cases with resident involvement, the rates of serious adverse events and any adverse events did not differ by academic quarter.

CONCLUSION

We could not demonstrate that the training of new (or newly promoted) residents is associated with an increase in the adverse events of spine surgery. Safeguards that have been put in place to ensure patient safety during this training period seem to be effective. Although adverse events were more common among cases with resident involvement than among cases without resident involvement, our data suggest that this association is more likely a product of the riskier population of cases in which residents participate than of the resident involvement itself.