Sequential harvesting of bone graft from the intramedullary canal of the femur

Complications associated using the reamer-irrigator -aspirator (RIA) system: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Complications associated with the application of the Reamer-irrigator-Aspirator (RIA) system are described in the literature. However, to date a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess prevalence of complications associated with the use of the RIA system have not been conducted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021269982). MEDLINE, the Web of Science Core Collection, and Embase were searched from the inception to 10 August 2021. The primary objective was to assess complications and blood loss associated with the use of the RIA system.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies involving 1834 procedures performed with the RIA system were finally included. A total of 105 complications were reported, with a pooled estimated overall prevalence of 1.7% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.40 to 3.60, with cortex perforation being the largest reported complication with a total of 34 incidences. A significant subgroup difference was observed (p = 0.02). In subgroup 1 (bone graft harvesting), complication prevalence was 1.4% (95% CI 0.2-3.4); in subgroup 2 (clearance intramedullary canal) it was 0.7% (95% CI 0.00-6.30) and in subgroup 3 (reaming with RIA system prior to nail fixation) 11.9% (95% CI 1.80-26.40). No statistically significant difference for tibia and femur as RIA system application site was observed (CI 0.69-4.19). In studies reporting blood loss, a mean volume of 803.29 ml, a mean drop of hemoglobin of 3.74 g/dl and a necessity of blood transfusion in 9.72% of the patients were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate a low overall prevalence rate of complications associated with the RIA system. However, especially the risk of cortical perforation and the frequently reported relevant intraoperative blood loss are complications that should be anticipated in perioperative management and ultimately considered when using the RIA system.

Fusion Revision Surgery With Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator to Harvest Autograft After Spinal Pseudarthrosis

Background and purpose

Spinal pseudarthrosis (SPA) is a common complication after attempted cervical or lumbosacral spinal fusion surgery. Revision surgeries usually necessitate bone graft implementation as an adjunct to hardware revision. Iliac crest bone graft is the gold standard but availability can be limited and usage often leads to persistent postoperative pain at the donor site. There is scant literature regarding the use of reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA)-harvested bone graft in lumbar spinal fusion. This is a collaborative study between orthopedic surgery and neurosurgery departments to utilize femur intramedullary autograft harvested using the RIA system as an adjunct graft in SPA revision surgeries.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review was conducted at a single center between August 2014 and December 2017 of patients aged ≥ 18 years and diagnosed with cervical, thoracic, or lumbar SPA who underwent revision fusion surgery using femur intramedullary autograft harvested using the RIA system. Plain radiographs and CT scans were utilized to confirm successful fusion.

Results

Eleven patients underwent 12 SPA revision surgeries using the RIA system as a source for bone graft in addition to bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and allograft. The mean amount of graft harvested was 51.3 mL (range: 20-70 mL). Nine patients achieved successful fusion (81.8%). The average time to fusion was 9.1 months. Four patients (36.4%) had postoperative knee pain. Regarding patient position and approach for harvesting, 66.7% (n = 8) of cases were positioned prone and a retrograde approach was utilized in 91.7% (n = 11) of cases.

Interpretation

This is the first case series in known literature to report the RIA system as a reliably considerable source of autologous bone graft for SPA revision surgeries. It provides a useful adjunct to the known types of bone grafts. Patient positioning and the approach choice for graft harvesting can be adjusted according to the fusion approach and the surgeon’s preference.

Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA) is a relatively recent device that is placed in the medullary canal of long bones to harvest a large volume of bone marrow, which is collected in a filtered canister. This study compares outcomes and complications of the RIA versus a traditional iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) for the treatment of bone defects.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus databases were accessed in June 2021. All clinical trials comparing the RIA and ICBG with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were included.

RESULTS

Data from 4819 patients were collected. The RIA group demonstrated lower site pain (P < 0.0001), fewer infections (P = 0.001), and a lower rate of adverse events (P < 0.0001). The ICBG group demonstrated a greater rate of bone union (P < 0.0001). There was no difference between groups in VAS (P = 0.09) and mean time to union (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

The current evidence supports the use of the RIA, given its low morbidity and short learning curve.

Is This Autograft Worth It?: The Blood Loss and Transfusion Rates Associated With Reamer Irrigator Aspirator Bone Graft Harvest

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the blood loss and transfusion rate associated with the use of reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA).

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Academic Level-I trauma hospital.

PATIENTS

One hundred eight patients requiring bone graft harvest for surgical reconstruction of nonunion or failed arthrodesis.

INTERVENTION

Bone graft harvest preformed via RIA or iliac crest bone graft (ICBG).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Blood loss as measured by a change in preoperative and postoperative hematocrit (Hct). In addition, postoperative transfusion reported intraoperative blood loss, volume of graft harvested, and major complications.

RESULTS

The average Hct drop was found to be 13.7 (4.1-27.4) in the RIA cohort of 61 patients and 7.36 (1.2-14.5) in the ICBG cohort of 47 patients (P = 0.013). Operative reports documented an average estimated blood loss of 674 mL (100-2000 mL) in the RIA cohort compared with 255 mL (50-1000 mL) in the ICBG cohort (P < 0.001). Twenty-seven patients (44%) required blood transfusion after RIA, whereas 10 patients (21%) required blood transfusion after ICBG (odds ratio 5.32, 95% confidence interval 2.2-6.3, P < 0.001). RIA procedures collected an average 53 mL (20-100 mL) of bone graft compared with 27 mL (15-50 mL) with ICBG. There was no significant difference between groups regarding age, sex, medical comorbidities, or postoperative major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This series demonstrated that 44% of patients undergoing RIA bone graft harvest required transfusion, with a mean Hct drop of 13.7 across all subjects, which is significantly greater than that associated with ICBG.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Mesenchymal stem cells from reaming material possess high osteogenic potential and react sensitively to bone morphogenetic protein 7

BACKGROUND

Femoral material harvested using the Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA) system is an alternative source for autogenous bone material in the treatment of non-unions, especially in combination with bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP). So far, there is no in vivo evidence of BMP-7 interacting with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from RIA material (RIA-MSCs) and iliac crest autogenous bone (BMSCs). The aim of this study was to compare their osteogenic potential when stimulated with BMP-7 in vivo.

METHODS

RIA-MSC and BMSC from 11 donors were isolated and the character of MSCs was investigated in vitro. Constructs consisting of MSC, β-tricalcium phosphate and 2 concentrations of BMP-7 (0.1 µg/mL and 1 µg/mL) were implanted in mice for 8 weeks. Bone formation in the constructs was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.

RESULTS

All cell populations used were determined to be MSCs. The qualitative in vivo analysis showed formation of bone tissue. With regard to quantity, bone formation was significantly higher in RIA constructs without or with stimulation with 0.1 µg/mL BMP-7, compared with BMSC constructs. We found no significant differences between constructs stimulated with 1 µg/mL BMP-7. In the RIA group, we observed a significant increase in bone formation after stimulation with 0.1 µg/mL BMP-7. No significant change could be found using a higher concentration. In the BMSC group, we detected a significant increase when using 0.1 µg/mL and 1 µg/mL BMP-7.

CONCLUSIONS

RIA material is a source of MSCs with high osteogenic potential. Our results showed that stimulation by BMP-7 leads to an increased osteogenic potential of MSCs. In this respect, RIA-MSCs reacted more sensitively than BMSCs.