Lyme amaurosis in a child

Neurosurgical management of intracranial hypertension in pediatric neuroborreliosis: a systematic literature review

Neuroborreliosis is a well-described complication of Lyme disease in the pediatric population. Intracranial hypertension can occur with this condition in children presenting with transient or permanent vision loss in severe cases. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to answer the following questions: what forms of neurosurgical management have been used in the treatment of intracranial hypertension in pediatric Lyme disease, what are the indications for such neurosurgical management, and what outcomes are associated with these interventions? 43 publications were identified including 131 cases of intracranial hypertension secondary to neuroborreliosis. Of these, 4 cases were identified where neurosurgical intervention was required for the management of intracranial hypertension in neuroborreliosis. All cases involved cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures including lumbar drains, ventriculoperitoneal shunts, and external ventricular drains. Neurosurgical intervention was utilized for intracranial hypertension refractory to medical therapy in all cases, with all patients experiencing vision loss. Resolution of papilledema was observed in all cases. 2 of 4 cases experienced complete resolution of vision loss, while 2 had long lasting visual deficits despite intervention. This review highlights the role for cerebrospinal fluid diversion in refractory intracranial hypertension secondary to neuroborreliosis. Timely recognition, awareness of this potential complication, and early neurosurgical involvement, if necessary, may help improve outcomes for this patient population. Further study is warranted.

Thieme Atlas of Anatomy: Head and Neuroanatomy

BACKGROUND

Establishing a causal relationship between optic neuritis and Lyme disease (LD) has been hampered by technical limitations in serologic diagnosis of LD. Even so, there is a general impression that optic neuritis is a common manifestation of LD.

METHODS

Retrospective case analysis of Lyme serology in 440 patients with optic neuritis examined between 1993 and 2003 in a single neuro-ophthalmic practice at Stony Brook University Medical Center, Suffolk County, New York, a region hyper-endemic for LD.

RESULTS

Lyme enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was positive in 28 (6.4%) patients with optic neuritis, three of whom had syphilis with cross-reactive antibodies. Among the remaining 25 ELISA-positive patients, optic neuritis could be confidently attributed to LD in only one case, a patient with papillitis. The other 24 cases had reactive Lyme serologies related to a history of LD years earlier, asymptomatic exposure, false-positive results, or non-specific humoral expansion. The ELISA in these 24 cases were weakly positive and the Western blots were negative by Centers for Disease Control criteria. There were no significant clinical differences between the 25 seropositive optic neuritis cases and 50 seronegative optic neuritis cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these cases and a review of the literature, there is insufficient evidence for a causal link between LD and retrobulbar optic neuritis or neuroretinitis. There is sufficient evidence to establish a causal link between LD and papillitis and posterior uveitis.

[Isolated intracranial hypertension due to Lyme's disease]

Lyme's borreliosis is characterized by the variety of its revealing symptoms, which may explain an often delayed diagnosis. We report on a case of a child affected by Lyme's disease, confirmed by serology, who presented a particular form consisting in an isolated intracranial hypertension. This rare form must be known and diagnosed early in order to avoid serious complications such as optic nerve atrophia in the absence of an appropriate treatment.

Optic neuropathy in children with Lyme disease

Involvement of the optic nerve, either because of inflammation or increased intracranial pressure, is a rare manifestation of Lyme disease. Of the 4 children reported here with optic nerve abnormalities, 2 had decreased vision months after disease onset attributable to optic neuritis, and 1 had headache and diplopia early in the infection because of increased intracranial pressure associated with Lyme meningitis. In these 3 children, optic nerve involvement responded well to intravenous ceftriaxone therapy. The fourth child had headache and visual loss attributable to increased intracranial pressure and perhaps also to optic neuritis. Despite treatment with ceftriaxone and steroids, he had persistent increased intracranial pressure leading to permanent bilateral blindness. Clinicians should be aware that neuro-ophthalmologic involvement of Lyme disease may have significant consequences. If increased intracranial pressure persists despite antibiotic therapy, measures must be taken quickly to reduce the pressure.

[Etiological and clinical characteristics of infectious optic neuritis]

Fifty-one patients with infectious optic neuritis (ION) with no associated choroidal or retinal involvement were studied in relation to the etiologic agents, and to the epidemiological and clinical features to look up features which could be used to distinct them from the demyelinating optic neuritis (DON) which have a well-known tendency to convert to multiple sclerosis. Bilateral involvement was found in 23 patients (45.1%), simultaneously in 18 cases. Sex distribution was 2M:1F. The ages ranged from 1 to 82 years (median 34.8); 1/3 of the patients were younger than 20 and 1/3 were 50 years of age or older. Syphilis was found in 19 patients being the single most common etiology, whereas viral infections were found in 41.2% of the cases. Visual acuity was severely damaged in most patients and was worse than 20/200 in 57.3% of the involved eyes. Color vision was affected in 91.8%. Visual field defects were found in 92.2%, with predominance of the central defects (40.7%). The optic disc was abnormal in 90.5% of the eyes. This study clearly demonstrates that ION and DON have distinct epidemiological and clinical features. The awareness of these differences may help clinicians to follow different paths for the correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment and prognostic orientation of their patients.