Trans-arterial embolisation therapies for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review

Conventional and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and pooled analysis

PURPOSE

Patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) have poor survival. Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (c-TACE) and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) are two treatment options for ICC, and this systematic review describes the efficacy of each of these modalities for unresectable ICC to guide clinical practice.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases regarding transhepatic arterial chemoembolization for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment Scale (NOS) was used to assess the risk of bias. Tumor response, disease control, and 1-, 2-, 3-year overall survival rate were pooled for estimation.

RESULTS

The number of initial search results was 1035, and 19 articles met the inclusion criteria for this study after the screening. A total of 23 study cohorts and 1091 patients were provided. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) for c-TACE and DEB-TACE treating ICC was 29.4% (95% CI 11.6-50.8%) and 51.2% (95% CI 30.6-71.7%), respectively; disease control rate (DCR) was 72.8% (95% CI 55.6-87.3%) and 88.7% (95% CI 78.8-96.2%), respectively. The pooled survival rate at 1 year, 2 year, and 3 year was 49.7% (95% CI 39.1-60.3%), 24.0% (95% CI 12.6-37.3%), and 23.5% (95% CI 11.1-38.7%) for c-TACE; 58.6% (95% CI 44.2-72.3%), 26.7% (95% CI 18.1-36.3%), and 16.2% (95% CI 6.0-29.4%) for DEB-TACE.

CONCLUSION

The descriptive analysis suggested that DEB-TACE treatment for ICC may have better tumor response and disease control rates than c-TACE treatment, but the impact on overall survival was not demonstrated significantly by DEB-TACE treatment.

Optimizing Patient Pathways in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers: Recent Advances and a French Perspective

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors that are rare in Western countries and have a poor prognosis. Three subgroups are defined by their anatomical location (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma) and exhibit distinct clinical, molecular, and epidemiologic characteristics. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced disease stage and are not eligible for curative-intent resection. In addition to first- and second-line chemotherapies (CisGem and FOLFOX, respectively), biologic therapies are now available that target specific genomic alterations identified in BTC. To date, targets include alterations in the genes for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2, v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2 or ERRB2), and neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK), and for those leading to DNA mismatch repair deficiency. Therapies targeting these genomic alterations have demonstrated clinical benefit for patients with BTC. Despite these therapeutic advancements, genomic diagnostic modalities are not widely used in France, owing to a lack of clinician awareness, local availability of routine genomic testing, and difficulties in obtaining health insurance reimbursement. The addition of durvalumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the immune checkpoint programmed cell death ligand-1, to CisGem in the first-line treatment of advanced BTC has shown an overall survival benefit in the TOPAZ-1 trial. Given the high mortality rates associated with BTC and the life-prolonging therapeutic options now available, it is hoped that the data presented here will support updates to the clinical management of BTC in France.

[Transarterial radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma]

Since the first version of the S3 guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2013, a large number of studies have consolidated the data on transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and created a broad evidence base. As a result, TARE was incorporated into the current 2021 S3 guideline with a number of specific recommendations, whereas it was previously only offered under study conditions. TARE is now offered with the other minimally invasive procedures for bridging and downstaging before liver transplantation, but also as an alternative to transarterial chemotherapy (TACE) in intermediate HCC and in locally limited intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in second-line therapy for selected patients-albeit with different levels of evidence. Based on the study situation, however, TARE is not recommended for advanced HCC; here, systemic therapy with immunotherapeutic agents is preferred based on current data.

[Clinical relevance of the new S3 guideline on hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary tract cancer for practitioners]

The update of the S3 German guideline for the management of the hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary tract cancer contains a comprehensive revision of the guideline for hepatocellular carcinoma and establishes a new guideline for biliary tract cancer. In recent years several studies have been conducted to improve diagnostic and therapeutic options for liver cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biopsy are important for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma. This guideline shows the progress in the treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma, including advances in liver transplantation, bridging and downstaging. For cholangiocarcinoma there is a focus on interventional treatment and resection. This guideline also emphasizes the need of molecular diagnostics and the resulting treatment options in targeted therapy.

Current management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: from resection to palliative treatments

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common liver primary tumour after hepatocellular carcinoma and represents 20% of all the cholangiocarcinomas. Its incidence is increasing and mortality rates are rising. Surgical resection is the only option to cure the disease, despite the high recurrence rates reported to be up to 80%. Intrahepatic recurrences may be still treated with curative intent in a small percentage of the patients. Unfortunately, due to lack of specific symptoms, most patients are diagnosed in a late stage of disease and often unsuitable for resection. Liver transplantation for ICC is still controversial. After the first published poor results, improving outcomes have been reported in highly selected cases, including locally advanced ICC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, when successful in controlling tumour progression. Thus, liver transplantation should be considered a possible option within study protocols. When surgical management is not possible, palliative treatments include chemotherapy, radiotherapy and loco-regional treatments such as radiofrequency ablation, trans-arterial chemoembolization or radioembolization.

Conclusions

This update on the management of ICC focusses on surgical treatments. Known and potential prognostic factors are highlighted in order to assist in treatment selection.

Embolotherapy for Hepatic Oncology: Current Perspectives and Future Directions

Primary and secondary liver cancers are a major cause of mortality worldwide. Transarterial liver-directed therapy, or embolotherapy, represents an important locoregional treatment strategy for primary and secondary liver tumors. Embolotherapeutic modalities include bland embolization (transarterial embolization), chemoembolization (transarterial chemoembolization), and radioembolization or selective internal radiotherapy. A brief technical overview of embolotherapeutic modalities as well as supportive evidence for the treatment of most common primary and secondary liver tumors will be discussed in this review. Several potential future applications, including synergy with systemic therapy, interventional theranostics, and artificial intelligence will also be reviewed briefly.

The Landmark Series: Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive biliary tract cancer (BTC) with distinct anatomic, molecular, and clinical characteristics that distinguishes it from other BTCs.

METHODS

In this landmark series review, we highlight the critical studies that have defined the surgical management of ICC, as well as several randomized controlled trials that have investigated adjuvant therapy strategies.

RESULTS

Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment and should involve margin-negative resection with regional lymphadenectomy. Several recently completed and ongoing randomized controlled trials are defining the indications for adjuvant therapy among patients with resected ICC.

CONCLUSIONS

In the near future, improved understanding of the molecular features of ICC should lead to newer targeted therapies as well as a more personalized approach to systemic therapy.

A pooled analysis of transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Purpose: The aim of this pooled analysis was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) microspheres for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, SCI with the English language from inception to October 2018. A pooled analysis was conducted using Stata software. Results: There were 16 eligible studies included in this pooled analysis. The pooled median overall survival (OS) from 12 studies was 14.3 (95% CI: 11.9-17.1) months. Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), no complete response was reported, and the median of partial response, stable disease and progressive disease were 11.5% (range: 4.8-35.3%), 61.5% (range: 42.9-81.3%) and 22.7% (range: 12.5-52.4%) respectively. The pooled disease control rate (DCR) from nine studies was 77.2% (95% CI: 70.2-84.2%). According to the type of microspheres, subgroup analysis was performed, the median OS in the glass microspheres group was 14.0 (95% CI: 9.1-21.4) months, and 14.3 (95% CI: 11.5-17.8) months in the resin microspheres group. The DCR was 77.3% (95% CI: 63.5-91.1%) and 77.4% (95% CI: 66.8-87.9%) in the glass and resin microspheres groups respectively. Most of the side effects reported in the included studies were mild and did not require intervention. Conclusion: TARE with ⁹⁰Y microspheres is safe and effective for patients with unresectable ICC with acceptable side effects. And it seems that the type of microsphere has no influence on therapeutic efficacy.

The efficacy and safety of different pharmacological interventions for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: A network meta-analysis

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is the second common cancer in liver cancer. Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatments for patients with advanced or metastatic disease, while fluorouracil (FU)-based and gemcitabine (GEM)-based treatments are most widely applied. This NMA aimed to figure out whether the addition of platinum (PLA) and target agents (TAR) can influence the efficacy and safety of standard chemotherapy. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted based on the records from PubMed, Embase and Cochrane. Eligible data was extracted from available qualified trials and outcomes. Software R 3.2.3 and STATA 13.0 were used to conduct the Bayesian NMA, calculating odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% credible interval (CrI) to evaluate different treatments.Almost all treatments were superior to best supportive care (BSC) and FU in terms of 1-OS, 2-OS and 1-PFS. GEM+PLA and GEM+PLA+TAR exhibited better efficacy than most treatments in 1-OS, 2-OS and 1-PFS, and yielded better results than BSC and GEM+FU in terms of 2-PFS. Most drug-containing treatments reported higher overall response rate (ORR) than BSC. GEM and GEM+FU were associated with a higher risk of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia compared to FU, FU+PLA and GEM+PLA. No statistical difference was detected in terms of nausea and vomiting.GEM+PLA and GEM+PLA+TAR were both efficacious and were associated with fewer adverse events. In conclusion, the addition of PLA can significantly improve the efficacy of FU and GEM-based treatments, and the addition of TAR to GEM+PLA can contribute to further improvement, but with a mild increase of adverse events.

Salinomycin enhances doxorubicin sensitivity through reversing the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of cholangiocarcinoma cells by regulating ARK5

Chemotherapy response rates in patients with cholangiocarcinoma remain low, primarily due to the development of drug resistance. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of cancer cells is widely accepted to be important for metastasis and progression, but it has also been linked to the development of chemoresistance. Salinomycin (an antibiotic) has shown some potential as a chemotherapeutic agent as it selectively kills cancer stem cells, and has been hypothesized to block the EMT process. In this study, we investigated whether salinomycin could reverse the chemoresistance of cholangiocarcinoma cells to the chemotherapy drug doxorubicin. We found that combined salinomycin with doxorubicin treatment resulted in a significant decrease in cell viability compared with doxorubicin or salinomycin treatment alone in two cholangiocarcinoma cell lines (RBE and Huh-28). The dosages of both drugs that were required to produce a cytotoxic effect decreased, indicating that these two drugs have a synergistic effect. In terms of mechanism, salinomycin reversed doxorubicin-induced EMT of cholangiocarcinoma cells, as shown morphologically and through the detection of EMT markers. Moreover, we showed that salinomycin treatment downregulated the AMP-activated protein kinase family member 5 (ARK5) expression, which regulates the EMT process of cholangiocarcinoma. Our results indicated that salinomycin reversed the EMT process in cholangiocarcinoma cells by inhibiting ARK5 expression and enhanced the chemosensitivity of cholangiocarcinoma cells to doxorubicin. Therefore, a combined treatment of salinomycin with doxorubicin could be used to enhance doxorubicin sensitivity in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

Chemoembolization versus radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a single institution image-based efficacy and comparative toxicity

Aim

Compare radioembolization (Y90) and chemoembolization (CE) for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (UICC).

Materials & methods

Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective search was performed. Forty patients with UICC were treated with either Y90 (n = 25, 39 treatments) or CE (n = 15, 35 treatments). Comparative analysis was performed using Student's t and fisher-exact tests. Multivariable-logistic regression was also performed.

Results

Median ages were 60 and 64 years for CE and Y90 groups, respectively (p = 0.798). Patient variables including age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, tumor burden, extra-hepatic disease, prior chemotherapy and prior surgery were similar between groups. Adverse events were similar in both groups (CE 20%, Y90 26%; p > 0.9). Overall response rate (CE 6%, Y90 4%; p > 0.9) and disease control rate (CE 46%, Y90 48%; p > 0.9) were statistically similar. Multilogistic regression did not identify any variables that correlated with disease control rate, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score and tumor burden.

Conclusion

Our observation shows that CE and Y90 display similar toxicity and disease control in the treatment of UICC.

Decision Making: Intra-arterial Therapies for Cholangiocarcinoma-TACE and TARE

The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has been increasing in recent years and now represents the second most common primary hepatic cancer in the United States. The prognosis is dismal without surgical resection. In patients ineligible to receive curative treatments, locoregional therapies represent a diverse array of techniques that can stabilize or reverse tumor progression to improve overall survival and reduce tumor-related symptoms. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) have been demonstrated to be efficacious methods for this patient population. Deciding between these two options is challenging. This article reviews the differences in patient selection, preprocedural evaluation, financial considerations and availability, quality of life, and rates of complications and overall survival.

Intraarterial Liver-Directed Therapies: The Role of Interventional Oncology

BACKGROUND

Since the early 1990s, the minimally invasive image-guided therapies used in interventional oncology to treat hepatocellular carcinoma have continued to evolve. Additionally, the range of applications has been expanded to the treatment of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer, neuroendocrine tumors, cholangiocarcinoma, breast cancer, melanoma, and sarcoma.

METHODS

We searched the literature to identify publications from 1990 to the present on various image-guided intraarterial therapies and their efficacy, as well as their role in the management of primary and secondary liver malignancies.

RESULTS

Chemoembolization and radioembolization are considered a standard of care in treating, delaying progression of disease, and downstaging to bridge to liver transplantation. Progression-free survival and overall survival outcomes are promising in patients with colorectal cancer and neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastases. Applications in the treatment of hepatic metastases from cholangiocarcinoma, breast cancer, melanoma, and sarcoma also show potential.

CONCLUSION

Interventional oncology and its image-guided intraarterial therapies continue to gain recognition as treatment options for primary and secondary liver cancers. Growing evidence supports their role as a standard of care alongside medical oncology, surgery, and radiation oncology.

Locoregional Therapies of Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is the second most primary liver malignancy with increasing incidence in Western countries. Currently, surgical R0 resection is regarded as the only potentially curative treatment. The results of systemic chemotherapy and best supportive care (BSC) in patients with metastatic disease are often disappointing in regard to toxicity, oncologic efficacy, and overall survival. In current practice, the use of different locoregional therapies is increasingly more accepted.

METHODS

A review of the literature on locoregional therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) was undertaken.

RESULTS

There are no prospective randomized controlled trials. For localized ICC, either primary or recurrent, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is by far the most commonly used thermal ablation modality. Thereby, a systematic review and meta-analysis reports major complication in 3.8% as well as 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of 82, 47, and 24%, respectively. In selected patients (e.g. with a tumor diameter of ≤3 cm), oncologic efficacy and survival after RFA are comparable with surgical resection. For diffuse ICC, different transarterial therapies, either chemotherapy-based (hepatic artery infusion (HAI), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)) or radiotherapy-based (transarterial radioembolization (TARE)), show extremely promising results. With regard to controlled trials (transarterial therapy versus systemic chemotherapy, BSC or no treatment), tumor control is virtually always better for transarterial therapies and very often accompanied by a dramatic survival benefit and improvement of quality of life. Of note, the latter is the case not only for patients without extrahepatic metastatic disease but also for those with liver-dominant extrahepatic metastatic disease. There are other locoregional therapies such as microwave ablation, irreversible electroporation, and chemosaturation; however, the current data support their use only in controlled trials or as last-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

Dedicated locoregional therapies are commonly used for primary and recurrent ICC as well as liver-only and liver-dominant extrahepatic metastatic disease. Currently, the best evidence and most promising results are available for RFA, HAI, TACE, and TARE. In cohort studies, the overall survival rates are similar to those obtained with surgery or systemic therapies. Prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to compare safety and efficacy between different surgical, interventional, and systemic therapies, as well as their combinations.

Knockdown of Sall4 inhibits intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cell migration and invasion in ICC-9810 cells

In spite of improvements in surgical technology, the resectability and curability of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are still low. Our previous study showed that the strong Sal-like protein 4 (Sall4)-positive cases had shorter overall survival compared to Sall4-negative cases, indicating an oncogenic role of Sall4 in ICC. In this study, we aimed to explore the precise mechanism of Sall4 on ICC cell invasion and metastasis. We evaluated the expression of Sall4, PTEN, and Bmi-1 in 28 cases of adjacent tissues and 175 cases of ICC tissues by using immunohistochemical staining. We found that the expression of Sall4 and Bmi-1 was significantly increased in ICC tissues compared with the adjacent tissues, while PTEN expression was reduced in ICC tissues compared with the adjacent tissues, and there was a reverse relationship between Sall4 and PTEN in ICC, whereas there was a positive correlation in Sall4 and Bmi-1 expression in ICC. In addition, overall survival analysis showed that ICC patients with low PTEN exhibited a worse prognosis than ICC patients with high PTEN, and lower Bmi-1 expression showed a better prognosis than ICC patients with high Bmi-1. By a battery of experiments in vitro, we demonstrated that Sall4 promotes ICC cell proliferation, and progression of ICC might be through PTEN/PI3K/Akt and Bmi-1/Wnt/β-catenin signaling and enhancing epithelial-mesenchymal transition process. Thus, Sall4 may be a potential target for the treatment of ICC metastasis.