Cost of AF Ablation: Where Do We Stand?

American Indians and atrial fibrillation

The American Indian population is known to experience high rates of cardiovascular disease and have a heightened vulnerability to severe outcomes driven by an overall poor health status and lower access to quality health care. Our group has previously published an analysis demonstrating that American Indians have the highest risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), as well as of AF-related stroke, when compared with other races and ethnicities. Despite this, AF in this population has not been extensively studied and additional publications are scarce. Our review article provides an up-to-date summary of the relevant literature addressing the relationship between race, ethnicity, and AF by focusing on American Indians.

Healthcare utilization and cost in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure undergoing catheter ablation

Background

Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). However, little is known about how healthcare utilization and cost change after ablation in this population. We sought to determine healthcare utilization and cost patterns among patients with AF and HF undergoing ablation.

Methods

Using a large United States administrative database, we identified (n = 1568) treated with ablation with a primary and secondary diagnosis of AF and HF, respectively, were evaluated 1‐year pre‐ and postablation for outcomes including inpatient admissions (AF or HF), emergency department (ED) visits, cardioversions, length of stay (LOS), and cost. A secondary analysis was extended to 3‐years postablation.

Results

Reductions were observed in AF‐related admissions (64%), LOS (65%), cardioversions (52%), ED visits (51%, all values, p < .0001), and HF‐related admissions (22%, p = .01). There was a 40% reduction in inpatient admission cost ($4165 preablation to $2510 postablation, p < .0001). In a sensitivity analysis excluding repeat‐ablation patients, a greater reduction in overall AF management cost was observed compared to the full cohort (−43% vs. −2%). Comparing 1‐year pre‐ to 3‐years postablation, both total mean AF‐management cost ($850 per‐patient per‐month 1‐year pre‐ to $546 3‐years postablation, p < .0001) and AF‐related healthcare utilization was reduced.

Conclusions

Catheter ablation in patients with AF and HF resulted in significant reductions in healthcare utilization and cost through 3‐years of follow‐up. This reduction was observed regardless of whether repeat ablation was performed, reflecting the positive impact of ablation on longer term cost reduction.

Intermediate term outcome after electrogram guided segmental ostial pulmonary vein isolation using an 8 mm tip catheter for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Introduction

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the most widely used procedure for ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Not withstanding recent advancements in this field, including sophisticated three-dimensional (3D) based imaging and advanced ablation catheters with contact force technology, many patients and healthcare systems in developing countries will not afford such an expensive therapeutic procedure. There are no data from India analyzing the efficacy of PVI for PAF using conventional mapping and ablation. In this article, we have summarized the intermediate term outcome following PVI in patients with PAF using electrogram-based mapping and a 8 mm tip ablation catheter.

Method

A total of 42 consecutive patients who underwent PVI for symptomatic PAF not controlled with at least one antiarrhythmic drug were studied in a tertiary care institute from March 2011 to June 2018. Patients with rheumatic AF were excluded. The pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy was assessed by pulmonary angiography during the ablation procedure. Using conventional electrophysiologic mapping, a variable curve Lasso catheter placed in the PVs was used to guide the earliest site of breakthrough. The segmental ostial PVI was performed using a 8 mm tip radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter. Elimination of all PV ostial potentials and complete entrance block into the PV were considered indicative of complete electrical isolation. Follow-up visits were scheduled at one, three, and six months after the procedure, and every six months thereafter. History, symptom review, clinical examination, and 12-lead ECG were performed at each follow-up.

Results

At pre-discharge, 34 patients (81%) were in sinus rhythm, while eight patients (19%) continued to have atrial fibrillation. The age of the study population was 51.5 ± 11.7 yrs. The mean follow-up duration was 44 ± 21 months (range 6–84 months). The number of PVs isolated included one (five patients, 11.9%), two (20 patients, 47.6%), three (12 patients, 28.6%), and four (five patients, 11.9%). In 42 patients, a total of 101 PVs were isolated. The right superior PV (RSPV) was isolated in 37 patients, the left superior PV (LSPV) was isolated in 39 patients, the left inferior PV (LIPV) was isolated in 14 patients, and the right inferior PV (RIPV) was isolated in six patients. The procedure duration was 125 ± 29 min and the fluoroscopy time was 47 ± 13 min. The number of patients who remained in sinus rhythm at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months were 34 (81%), 32 (76%), 30 (71%), and 26 (62%), respectively. Two patients of these underwent repeat PVI, which was successful, and they had freedom from AF episodes. Complications were rare. One patient had a minor pericardial effusion, and one patient had transient sinus pauses, which were conservatively managed.

Conclusion

Conventional RF ablation using PV potential-based mapping and ablation with 8 mm tip catheters is safe for patients with PAF. The intermediate term outcome is satisfactory and cost-effective in our setting with limited resources.

Cost-Effectiveness of Cardiac Radiosurgery for Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Reducing Health Care Morbidity, Utilization, and Costs

In the United States (U.S.), atrial fibrillation (AF) is the second-most common cardiovascular condition after hypertension, affecting four million Americans each year. Individuals with AF are three times more likely to be hospitalized over the span of a year when compared to medically matched control groups. The considerably large clinical population of individuals with AF mandates that the cost-effectiveness and efficacy of current treatment regimens for AF have egregious implications for health care spending and public health. Unfortunately, catheter ablation for AF treatment has been shown to make only modest gains in quality-adjusted life years, has yet to demonstrate cost-utility advantages over conventional therapies for AF, and has a reported rate of recurrence for AF that is notably high. Thus, there is a major unmet clinical need for a therapeutic option to treat AF that produces more consistent and efficacious results that are cost-effective. Cardiac radiosurgery as a therapy for AF has the potential to be remarkably cost-effective and produce robust patient outcomes. CyberHeart Inc. has developed the world's first-ever cardiac radiosurgery (CRS) system designed to ablate the heart non-invasively. Procedures that ablate the heart utilizing the Cyberheart CRS system are anticipated to allow higher efficacy and more consistent results than current techniques such as catheter ablation. The aim of this study is to present the current healthcare utilization and expenditures in AF treatment, report the cost-effectiveness of catheter ablation for AF, and project the potential cost-effectiveness of cardiac radiosurgery for the treatment of AF.

Why we Should Not Delay Ablation in New Onset Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation

Recurrent episodes of atrial fibrillation are associated with progressive left atrial substrate remodelling over time. We present an argument for early ablation in the treatment of recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation prior to such deleterious changes in "left atrial electrical health".