Transesophageal echocardiography to evaluate success of transcatheter closure of large secundum atrial septal defects in adults using the buttoned device

Morphologic Characteristics and Relating Factors to the Need of Technical Modification in Transcatheter Closure of Large Atrial Septal Defect (>/=25 mm)

Background and Objectives

The rigid coupling between the delivery wire and the right atrial disk has been occasionally encountered during transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD). Therefore the device frequently makes a perpendicular angle, and the leading edge of left atrial disk slips through the defect and prolapses into right atrium (RA) before it is properly placed in the septum. The purpose of this study is to investigate relating factors to the need of technical modification in transcatheter closure of large ASD and to evaluate relevant morphologic characteristics of atrial septal rim in this situation.

Subjects and Methods

From July, 2003 to May, 2007, 312 patients underwent transcatheter occlusion of ASD with Amplatzer Septal Occluder® (ASO, AGA medical corporation, Golden Valley, MN, USA) at Yonsei Cardiovascular Center and among them 109 patients had large ASD (≥25 mm) and these patients were enrolled in our study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the deploying methods of the device (Group I: standard method, Group II: modified methods). Assessments of the defects and its surrounding rims were made by echocardiography.

Results

There were no differences between 2 groups in age, body weight and height except for balloon-stretched diameter (stop-flow technique) and device size. Group II patients with modified methods showed larger balloon-stretched diameter and device size than group I patients with standard method. The mean length of anterosuperior (AS) rim in group II was significantly shorter than group I (p<0.05). As the size of the device used in procedure increased, there was a trend towards increase in the need of modified methods.

Conclusion

This study shows that AS rim deficiency and the size of ASD may be the relating factors to the need of technical modification in transcatheter closure of ASD. Therefore, when the initial try with standard method is not successful in large ASD with deficient AS rim, we suggest that changing strategy of implantation may save time and efforts and possibly reduce the risk of complications associated with prolonged procedure.

Cribriform amplatzer device closure of fenestrated atrial septal defects: feasibility and technical aspects

Fenestrated atrial septal defects (F-ASDs) may pose a challenge to device closure; recently, a cribriform device with a minimal connecting intrawaist diameter and large, equal left- and right-sided discs has been designed to cover more than one adjacent defect. This study demonstrates the feasibility and technical aspects of closing F-ASDs using this new device. Sixteen patients between August 2003 and January 2006 were included in this study. The inclusion criterion was the presence of a F-ASD diagnosed by transesophageal echocardiography. One of the three available cribriform ASD device sizes (18, 25, or 35 mm) was implanted. Patients were followed for at least 1 year after the procedure. Thirteen patients had successful cribriform ASD device implantation (median age and weight, 12.5 years and 36 kg, respectively). Ten patients (62%) had an associated atrial septal aneurysm. The mean procedure time was 75.6 +/- 28.5 min and the mean fluoroscopy time 14.8 +/- 6.3 min. The RVEDD was significantly reduced, from a mean of 24.2 mm to 21.0 (p < 0.05). One patient developed atrial tachycardia requiring cardioversion during the procedure. There were no embolic events, heart block, or mortality. Complete closure was 10 of 13 (77 %) the next day and 12 of 13 (92%) at 6 and 12 months. We conclude that the cribriform Amplatzer device can be successfully and safely used in patients with F-ASDs. Complete closure may take up to 6 months.

Transcatheter closure of complex atrial septal defects: feasibility and mid-term results

OBJECTIVE

Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs) is currently a reliable alternative to surgery, even though challenging in the case of complex septal anatomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and mid-term results of percutaneous closure of complex ASDs in a tertiary referral centre compared with simple ASD closure.

METHODS

Between April 2000 and November 2004, 209 patients were submitted to transcatheter ASD closure; 83 patients (39.7%) presented with a complex defect (large ASDs with a deficient rim or a multifenestrated/aneurysmal septum) and were treated using different devices tailored to the atrial septal anatomy.

RESULTS

The transcatheter procedure was successful in 72 patients (86.8%), using a single device in 69 patients and two devices in the remaining three patients. Overall, 71 Amplatzer septal occluders, two multifenestrated Amplatzer septal occluders and two Cardioseal/Starflex devices were used. Procedural and fluoroscopy times were 141 +/- 45 min and 28 +/- 22 min, respectively (P < 0.0001 vs. simple ASD closure for both comparisons). Procedure-related complications were recorded in nine patients (12.5%) (P < 0.01 vs. simple ASD closure). One patient required surgical repair of a femoral arteriovenous fistula and another developed mitral valve dysfunction. Immediate ASD occlusion was recorded in 59.7% of patients, reaching 95.9% at the last follow-up control (P = NS vs. simple ASD closure for both comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous closure of complex ASDs may be considered technically feasible, relatively safe and highly effective, although the procedure is still significantly more demanding than transcatheter closure of simple ASDs.

Short- and intermediate-term results of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect with the Amplatzer Septal Occluder

BACKGROUND

The Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO) (AGA Medical Corp, Golden Valley, Minn) has gained wide acceptance for transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD). We conducted this study to evaluate the short-and intermediate-term results of ASD closure with the ASO and to determine the impact of deficient rim on the results.

METHODS

Between March 1999 and February 2003, 197 patients underwent attempted transcatheter closure of ASD with the ASO. The size of the selected device either equaled or was 1 to 2 mm larger than the stretched diameter of the defect. Transesophageal echocardiography was used to monitor the implantation procedure. One hundred and fourteen patients (58%) with a deficiency in 1 rim (<5 mm) were included as group I, and the remaining 83 patients with adequate rims comprised group II.

RESULTS

The mean stretched diameter measured with the balloon catheter was 18.6 +/- 6.7 mm (range 7.1-37.2 mm). Deployment of the ASO was successful in 191 (97%) patients and failed in 6. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the success rate for ASD closure (110/114 vs 81/83). Repositioning of the device was required in 28 patients: 21 in group I and 7 in group II (21/114 vs 7/83, P >.05) The mean stretched diameter of the defect in these 28 patients was significantly larger than that in those who did not require repositioning of the device (27.3 +/- 5.7 vs 17.1 +/- 5.5 mm, P <.01). Three patients experienced severe complications: 1 had transient complete atrioventricular block, 1 had tamponade requiring drainage, and 1 had dislodgement of the device requiring emergent operation. One had a distal embolism to a fingertip. Echocardiography at 1 day, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after the procedure showed residual shunts in 37/191 (19%), 15/189 (8%), 11/176 (6%), 7/131 (5%), and 3/72 (4%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ASO is a safe and effective device for the transcatheter closure of ASD. Deficiency in 1 rim, particularly the superior anterior rim, does not influence the success rate of ASD closure.

New technique for device closure of large atrial septal defects

The objective of this study was to describe a new technique for transcatheter device closure of large atrial septal defects (ASDs) using the Amplatzer septal occluder and our experience with this technique in 14 patients. Transcatheter closure of large (> 25 mm) ASDs is challenging. We have developed a balloon-assisted technique (BAT) to facilitate device closure of large ASDs. The BAT consists of using a balloon catheter to support the left atrial (LA) disk of the Amplatzer septal occluder during device deployment. The balloon support prevents prolapse of the LA disk into the right atrium. Between April 2003 and February 2004, 14 patients with large ASDs (mean age, 25.71 +/- 15.71 years; mean weight, 51.21 +/- 23.78 kg) underwent device closure with the Amplatzer septal occluder using the BAT. The median balloon-stretched diameter of the ASD was 32 (range, 26-40) mm. The median device size used was 33 mm (range, 26-40 mm). All 14 patients had successful deployment of the device using the BAT. The mean follow-up period was 16.5 +/- 11.95 weeks. No major complications were noted during the procedure or on short-term follow-up. The BAT enables predictably successful closure of large ASDs using the Amplatzer septal occluder.

Effect of Atrial Septal Mobility on Transcatheter Closure of Interatrial Communications

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter techniques have evolved as alternatives to surgical closure of interatrial communications due to its less invasive nature and low morbidity. The technique may be limited by the inability to deploy the device and, thus, may be complicated by significant residual shunting. Mobile or redundant septal tissue has been implicated as a possible cause of unsuccessful closure.

METHODS

To determine if atrial septal hypermobility precludes successful transcatheter device closure of interatrial communications, 69 patients (mean age 46.4 +/- 17.5 years [male:female ratio 34:35]) with periprocedural transesophageal echocardiograms were reviewed. Septal excursion was defined as the maximal transit of the interatrial septum between either side of the plane connecting the superior and inferior attachment points. Unsuccessful closure was defined as subsequent cardiac surgery to close the defect, inability to deploy the device, recurrent attempts at closure, device malalignment, residual shunting greater than mild in degree on follow-up transthoracic study, and procedural complications.

RESULTS

Reasons for closure were the following: embolic events (n = 48); platypnea/orthodeoxia (n = 15); atrial septal defect with right ventricular dilatation and paroxysmal atrial tachycardia (n = 2); atrial septal defect (n = 3); and prophylactic patent foramen ovale closure in a scuba diver (n = 1). Successful closure occurred in 76% of patients (n = 53). Compared with those patients with successful transcatheter closure, the mean septal excursion in patients with failed closure was 0.66 +/- 0.56 cm versus 0.76 +/- 0.47 cm (P = not significant [NS]).

CONCLUSION

Our results do not support the concern that exaggerated septal mobility compromises successful device closure of interatrial communications.