Outcome of patients with end-stage renal disease admitted to the intensive care unit

Predictive performance of the sequential organ failure assessment score for in-hospital mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease in intensive care units: A multicenter registry in Japan

INTRODUCTION

There is limited evidence regarding whether the performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score differs between patients with and without end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in intensive care units (ICUs).

METHODS

We used a multicenter registry (Japanese Intensive care Patient Database) to enroll adult ICU patients between April 2018 and March 2021. We recalibrated the SOFA score using a logistic regression model and evaluated its predictive ability in both ESKD and non-ESKD groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

128 134 patients were enrolled. The AUROC of the SOFA score was lower in the ESKD group than in the non-ESKD group [0.789 (95% CI, 0.774-0.804) vs. 0.846 (95% CI, 0.841-0.850)]. The calibration plot revealed good performance in both groups. However, it overestimated in-hospital mortality in ESKD groups.

CONCLUSION

The SOFA score demonstrated good predictive ability in patients with and without ESKD, but it overestimated the in-hospital mortality in ESKD patients.

Incidence and Outcomes of Patients Receiving Chronic Kidney Replacement Therapy Admitted to Scottish ICUs Between 2009 and 2019-A National Observational Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence and characteristics of ICU admissions in the Scottish population of patients treated with chronic kidney replacement therapy (KRT) over an 11-year period and determine factors associated with post-ICU admission mortality.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

We analyzed admissions to Scottish intensive care environments between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019.

PATIENTS

All patients receiving chronic KRT-including maintenance dialysis and kidney transplant-in Scotland.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Descriptive statistics and factors associated with mortality using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models. From 10,657 unique individuals registered in the Scottish Renal Registry over the 11-year study period and alive as of January 1, 2009, 1,402 adult patients were identified as being admitted to a Scottish critical care setting. Between 2009 and 2019, admissions to ICU increased in a nonlinear manner driven by increases in admissions for renal causes and elective cardiac surgery. The ICU admission rate was higher among patients on chronic dialysis than in kidney transplant recipients (59.1 vs 19.9 per 1,000 person-years), but post-ICU mortality was similar (about 24% at 30 d and 40% at 1 year). Admissions for renal reasons were most common (20.9%) in patients undergoing chronic dialysis, whereas kidney transplant recipients were most frequently admitted for pneumonia (19.3%) or sepsis (12.8%). Adjusted Cox PH models showed that receiving invasive ventilation and vasoactive drugs was associated with an increased risk of death at 30 days post-ICU admission (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.28-2.39 and 1.72; 95% CI, 1.28-2.31, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

With a growing population of kidney transplant recipients and the improved survival of patients on chronic dialysis, the number of ICU admissions is rising in the chronic KRT population. Mortality post-ICU admission is high for these patients.

Prediction of mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common medical condition that is increasing in prevalence. Existing published evidence has revealed through regression analyses that several clinical characteristics are associated with mortality in CKD patients. However, the predictive accuracies of these risk factors for mortality have not been clearly demonstrated.

AIM

To demonstrate the accuracy of mortality predictive factors in CKD patients by utilizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) analysis.

METHODS

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for eligible articles through January 2021. Studies were included based on the following criteria: (1) Study nature was observational or conference abstract; (2) Study populations involved patients with non-transplant CKD at any CKD stage severity; and (3) Predictive factors for mortality were presented with AUC analysis and its associated 95% confidence interval (CI). AUC of 0.70-0.79 is considered acceptable, 0.80-0.89 is considered excellent, and more than 0.90 is considered outstanding.

RESULTS

Of 1759 citations, a total of 18 studies (n = 14579) were included in this systematic review. Eight hundred thirty two patients had non-dialysis CKD, and 13747 patients had dialysis-dependent CKD (2160 patients on hemodialysis, 370 patients on peritoneal dialysis, and 11217 patients on non-differentiated dialysis modality). Of 24 mortality predictive factors, none were deemed outstanding for mortality prediction. A total of seven predictive factors [N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), BNP, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), augmentation index, left atrial reservoir strain, C-reactive protein, and systolic pulmonary artery pressure] were identified as excellent. Seventeen predictive factors were in the acceptable range, which we classified into the following subgroups: predictors for the non-dialysis population, echocardiographic factors, comorbidities, and miscellaneous.

CONCLUSION

Several factors were found to predict mortality in CKD patients. Echocardiography is an important tool for mortality prognostication in CKD patients by evaluating left atrial reservoir strain, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, diastolic function, and left ventricular mass index.

Short- and Long-Term Outcome of Chronic Dialyzed Patients Admitted to the ICU and Assessment of Prognosis Factors: Results of a 6-Year Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Data about end-stage kidney disease patients admitted to the ICU are scarce, dated, and mostly limited to short-term survival. The aim of this study was to assess the short- and long-term outcome and to determine the prognostic factors for end-stage kidney disease patients admitted to the ICU.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Medical ICUs in two university hospitals.

PATIENTS

Consecutive end-stage kidney disease patients admitted in two ICUs between 2012 and 2017.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Renal replacement therapy variables, demographic, clinical, and biological data were collected. The requirement of mechanical ventilation and vasopressive drugs were also collected. In-ICU and one-year mortality were estimated and all data were analyzed in order to identify predictive factors of short and long-term mortality. A total of 140 patients were included, representing 1.7% of total admissions over the study period. Septic shock was the main reason for admission mostly of pulmonary origin. Median Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score were at 63 and 6.7, respectively. In-ICU, hospital, and 1-year mortality were 41.4%, 46.4%, and 63%, respectively. ICU mortality was significantly higher as compared with ICU control group non-end-stage kidney disease (25% vs 41.4%; p = 0.005). By multivariate analysis, the short-term outcome was significantly associated with nonrenal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, and with the requirement of mechanical ventilation or/and vasoconstrictive agents during ICU stay. One-year mortality was associated with increased dialysis duration (> 3 yr) and phosphatemia (> 2.5 mmol/L), with lower albuminemia (< 30 g/L) and nonrenal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment greater than 8.

CONCLUSIONS

End-stage kidney disease patients presented frequently severe complications requiring critical care that induced significant short- and long-term mortality. ICU and hospital mortality depended mainly on the severity of the critical event reflected by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and the need of mechanical ventilation and/or catecholamines. One-year mortality was associated with both albuminemia and phosphatemia and with prior duration of chronic dialysis treatment, and with organ failure at ICU admission.

Lower short-term mortality in ICU patients on chronic dialysis than in those requiring acute dialysis

BACKGROUND

In ICU patients, we aimed to describe the outcomes of those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as compared to those requiring acute renal replacement therapy (RRT).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all adult patients admitted to a general, university hospital ICU from 2005 to 2012. ESRD was defined as use of chronic RRT >90 days prior to admission.

RESULTS

We included 5927 patients of whom 1004 (17%) received acute RRT and 161 (3%) had pre-existing ESRD requiring RRT. Thirty-day mortality was 42% vs 28% for acute RRT vs ESRD patients (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.90 (0.61-1.34)), and 16% for those not requiring RRT (aHR 0.91 (0.60-1.38) compared to ESRD patients). Ninety-day mortality was 55% vs 45% for acute RRT vs ESRD patients (aHR 0.96 (0.70-1.31)), and 22% for those not requiring RRT (aHR 1.19 (0.84-1.67) compared to ESRD patients). Ninety-day ESRD survivors were younger, less severely ill and needed less vasopressor treatment than 90-day ESRD non-survivors. Five-year mortality was 68% vs 69% for acute RRT vs ESRD patients (aHR 1.06 (0.81-1.39)), and 38% for those not requiring RRT (aHR 1.31 (0.99-1.74) compared to ESRD patients).

CONCLUSIONS

The crude mortality for patients with pre-existing ESRD was high. Short-term mortality was within range of those not receiving RRT when adjusted for confounders. The severity of acute illness and the burden of comorbidities may be more important than the lack of kidney function per se for the short-term prognosis of RRT patients in the ICU.

Predictors of Mortality in Patients with Acute Renal Failure

Mortality associated with acute renal failure (ARF) remains high despite of developments in therapy strategies and definition of different prognostic factors. Therefore, this study focused on to define new prognostic factors and especially regional characteristics of the ARF patients. One hundred fifteen ARF patients, diagnosed from November 1998 to May 2003, were included to this prospective and observational study. Clinical features, laboratory parameters, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III scores and co-morbid conditions of the patients were examined. Clinical and laboratory data, and APACHE III scores were recorded at the first nephrology consult day. Thirty of the patients (26%) died. APACHE III scores, presence and the total number of co-morbid conditions and serum albumin levels at the time of first nephrology consultation were found as independent predictors of mortality. There was a negative correlation between APACHE III scores and serum albumin levels. Not only increased APACHE III score and presence of co-morbid conditions but also low serum albumin level was found as the predictors of mortality. However, only serum albumin level is seen as modifiable prognostic factor among these parameters. Therefore, further studies are necessary to determine the causes of hypoalbuminemia in patients with ARF and the effect of it’s effective treatment on patients outcome.

Impact of end-stage renal disease on hospital outcomes among patients admitted to intensive care units: A retrospective matched-pair cohort study

AIM

We aimed to estimate the burden of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs), by comparing hospital outcomes between patients with and without ESRD.

METHODS

Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we identified patients aged 20 years or older who were admitted to ICUs for ≥3 days (2 nights) in 2011. We created a matched cohort of patients with and without ESRD for hospital, age, sex, main diagnosis category, and ICU admission type (medical or surgical) at a maximum ratio of 1:3. For these matched patients, we compared patient characteristics, treatment regimens at ICU admission, and hospital outcomes. We also performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis for the associations between ESRD and 28-day (counting from ICU admission) and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Among the 164 423 eligible patients, 7998 (4.9%) had ESRD, from which 5228 ESRD and 12 274 non-ESRD patients were matched for the aforementioned factors. Compared to non-ESRD patients, ESRD patients were on more intensive treatment regimens, including mechanical ventilation, vasoactive drugs, and blood transfusion. Patients with ESRD showed significantly higher ICU, 28-day, and in-hospital mortality and longer lengths of stay in the ICU and hospital (28-day mortality: 11.7% vs. 8.3%; P < 0.001, in-hospital mortality: 21.1% vs. 12.0%; P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding factors, ESRD was independently associated with 28-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-1.52) and in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.69-2.02).

CONCLUSION

This study involving the Japanese national inpatient database, with a matched-pair cohort design, suggested that ESRD is an important burden in the critical care setting.

Impact of End-Stage Renal Disease and Acute Kidney Injury on ICU Outcomes in Patients With Sepsis

PURPOSE

To report the characteristics and outcomes of patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU) with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) compared to patients with nonkidney injury (non-KI).

METHODS

Retrospective study of all patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU of a university hospital within a 12-month time period. Data were obtained from the University Health Consortium database and a chart review of the electronic medical records.

RESULTS

We identified 39 cases of ESRD, 106 cases of AKI, and 103 cases of non-KI. Intensive care unit mortality was 15.4% for ESRD, 30.2% for AKI, and 13.6% for non-KI ( P < .01). Hospital mortality was 20.5% for ESRD, 32.1% for AKI, and 13.6% for non-KI ( P < .01). Early AKI and late AKI had an ICU mortality of 24.4% versus 50% ( P <.01), hospital mortality of 26.8% versus 50% ( P = .03), ICU length of stay (LOS) of 3 and 6 days ( P = .04), and hospital LOS of 7 and 12.5 days ( P <.01), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with sepsis having AKI have a higher mortality rate than those with ESRD and non-KI. Hospital and ICU mortality rates for patients with ESRD were similar to non-KI patients. Late AKI compared to early AKI had a higher mortality and longer LOS.

Long-term mortality and risk factors for development of end-stage renal disease in critically ill patients with and without chronic kidney disease

Introduction

Prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) amongst intensive care unit (ICU) admissions is rising. How mortality and risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) differs between those with and without CKD and with acute kidney injury (AKI) is unclear. Determining factors that increase the risk of ESRD is essential to optimise treatment, identify patients requiring nephrological surveillance and for quantification of dialysis provision.

Method

This cohort study used the Swedish intensive care register 2005–2011 consisting of 130,134 adult patients. Incomplete cases were excluded (26,771). Patients were classified (using diagnostic and intervention codes as well as admission creatinine values) into the following groups: ESRD, CKD, AKI, acute-on-chronic disease (AoC) or no renal dysfunction (control). Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcome was ESRD incidence.

Results

Of 103,363 patients 4,192 had pre-existing CKD; 1389 had ESRD; 5273 developed AKI and 998 CKD patients developed AoC. One-year mortality was greatest in AoC patients (54 %) followed by AKI (48.7 %), CKD (47.6 %) and ESRD (40.3 %) (P < 0.001). Five-year mortality was highest for the CKD and AoC groups (71.3 % and 68.2 %, respectively) followed by AKI (61.8 %) and ESRD (62.9 %) (P < 0.001). ESRD incidence was greatest in the AoC and CKD groups (adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) 259 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 156.9–429.1) and 96.4, (95 % CI 59.7–155.6) respectively) and elevated in AKI patients compared with controls (adjusted IRR 24 (95 % CI 3.9–42.0); P < 0.001). Risk factors independently associated with ESRD in 1-year survivors were, according to relative risk ratio, AoC (356; 95 % CI 69.9–1811), CKD (267; 95 % CI 55.1–1280), AKI (30; 95 % CI 5.98–154) and presence of elevated admission serum potassium (4.6; 95 % CI 1.30–16.40) (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Pre-ICU renal disease significantly increases risk of death compared with controls. Subjects with AoC disease had extreme risk of developing ESRD. All patients with CKD who survive critical care should receive a nephrology referral.

Trial registration

Clinical trials registration number: NCT02424747 April 20th 2015.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-1101-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Which risk-adjustment index performs better in predicting 30-day mortality? A systematic review and meta-analysis

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Individual comparisons of the performance of risk-adjustment indices have been widely conducted. Few reviews have been conducted to summarize the performance of different risk-adjustment indices. A 30-day mortality rate is widely used to evaluate the quality of care in hospitals by federal agencies like the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This study examined relative performance of risk-adjustment indices that predict 30-day mortality.

METHODS

Databases including Medline, PubMed and PsycINFO were searched for studies that compared risk-adjustment indices. The search protocol included comparative studies in which the performance of risk-adjustment indices were compared across any defined cohort to compare 30-day mortality, including mortality within 30 days and intensive care unit mortality, which lasts less than 30 days. Data were extracted using a structured form and abstract data included author and publication year, population studied (including location, sample size, study time period), comparison indices, outcome studied, results and conclusions from the results. A meta-analytical approach was used to summarize all the studies. Scaled ranking score was used to estimate the relative superiority of any given risk-adjustment indices. A hypergeometric test was carried out to evaluate the performance of risk-adjustment measures.

RESULTS

Out of 2805 studies identified, 23 studies met the eligibility criteria. Main risk-adjustment indices used for comparison included Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Charlson co-morbidity index, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS). Based on scaled ranking score, SAPS performed best (score 0.510) among all the risk-adjustment indices. However, based on hypergeometric test, the five measures performed equally well.

CONCLUSIONS

Although all the selected risk-adjustment indices perform equally well, SAPS seems better than other indices for short-term mortality based on scaled ranking score.

Renal replacement therapy in the ICU: comparison of clinical features and outcomes of patients with acute kidney injury and dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study is to study clinical features and outcomes of the patients who had renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the intensive care unit (ICU) between 2000 and 2007.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 222 patients.

RESULTS

Overall ICU mortality and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) rates were 58.1 and 61.3 %. The mean APACHE II score was 27.6 ± 8.3. Chronic dialysis (CD) patients formed 45.5 % of the study population. Acute kidney injury (AKI) patients had higher rates of IMV (73 vs. 51.5 %, p = 0.002), cancer (27.8 vs. 7.9 %, p ≤ 0.001) and mortality (67.8 vs. 50.5 %, p = 0.010) than CD patients. AKI patients with normal kidney function (NKF) before ICU admission had poorer prognosis than acute-on-chronic kidney disease (CKD) and CD patients (78.6, 51 and 50.5 %, respectively, p ≤ 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that IMV (OR, 14.8; 95 % CI, 5.47-40.05; p ≤ 0.001) and having NKF before hospitalization (OR, 2.8; 95 % CI, 1.04-7.37; p = 0.041) were predictors of overall ICU mortality. Additionally, IMV is found as a prognostic factor for both AKI (OR, 18.7; 95 % CI, 4.48-77.72; p ≤ 0.001) and CD patients (OR, 8.14; 95 % CI, 2.01-33.04; p = 0.003), but APACHE II score is meaningful only for CD patients (OR, 1.13; 95 % CI, 1.02-1.26; p = 0.024). The areas under the ROC curves for APACHE II score were 0.52 (95 % CI, 0.39-0.66) for AKI and 0.78 (95 % CI, 0.55-0.89) for CD patients.

CONCLUSION

The observed ICU mortality among patients requiring RRT is high and IMV is associated with mortality. AKI patients have increased mortality compared to CD patients. AKI patients with past NKF have poorer prognosis than acute-on-CKD and CD patients.

Assessment of dialysis dose in critically ill maintenance dialysis patients

Maintenance dialysis patients are admitted more frequently to the intensive care unit (ICU) and have higher ICU mortality than the general population. It is unclear if such dialysis patients receive adequate dialysis in the ICU setting. Using the Daugirdas formula for calculation of spKt/Vurea, single treatment delivered dialysis dose was assessed in 85 critically ill maintenance hemodialysis patients during their first ICU dialysis session. Weekly delivered spKt/Vurea was determined in the surviving 64 patients and compared with their corresponding delivered outpatient dialysis dosages. Outcome measures were ICU and in-hospital mortality and mortality at 6 and 12 months after discharge. Prescribed dose of the first ICU dialysis was a spKt/Vurea of 1.43 ± 0.11, the single treatment delivered dose was 1.02 ± 0.14. The weekly prescribed ICU Kt/Vurea was 4.25 ± 0.12 and delivered ICU Kt/Vurea was 3.48 ± 0.19. Patients with sepsis had the lowest mean spKt/Vurea values (0.87 ± 0.12). Serial measurements of delivered dialysis dose suggest that this gap is explained by variability of volume of urea distribution. ICU mortality was 25% and was related to APACHE II score, but not to delivered intermittent hemodialysis dose. Critically ill maintenance dialysis patients receive suboptimal dialysis doses. The impact of short-term underdialysis on survival of hospitalized maintenance dialysis patients remains unknown. Assessment of dialysis adequacy should be routinely performed in these patients and delivered dialysis should be tracked through the initial clinical course.

Care of the critically ill patient with advanced chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The number of individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is rising, and these individuals often require intensive care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with CKD and ESRD require critical care more frequently than those without these conditions and have similar reasons for requiring critical care as the general population. However, the burden of comorbidities, overall severity of illness as assessed by standard scoring systems, and mortality are higher in patients with ESRD than in the non-ESRD critically ill. After adjustment for demographics, comorbidities, and physiologic variables, the increased mortality risk in patients with ESRD is attenuated. In comparison to patients with dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury (AKI), critically ill patients with ESRD have a more favorable prognosis. Severity of illness scoring systems such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation and Simplified Acute Physiology Score tend to overestimate the risk of death in critically ill ESRD patients. ICU admission does not appear to dramatically affect long-term mortality in those with ESRD who survive their initial acute illness as compared ESRD patients without critical illness.

SUMMARY

Despite the manifest physiologic derangements attending CKD/ESRD, a higher burden of comorbid conditions and a greater severity of illness on presentation account for much of the increased mortality. There is no justification for therapeutic nihilism in this population.

Outcomes of chronic hemodialysis patients in the intensive care unit

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) experience higher rates of hospitalisation, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality and are more likely to require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) than patients with normal renal function. Sepsis and cardiovascular diseases are the most common reasons for ICU admission. ICU mortality rates in patients requiring chronic hemodialysis are significantly higher than for patients without ESRD; however, dialysis patients have a better ICU outcome than those with acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring renal replacement therapy suggesting that factors other than loss of renal function contribute to their prognosis. Current evidence suggests, the longer-term outcomes after discharge from ICU may be favourable and that long-term dependence on dialysis should not prejudice against prompt referral or admission to ICU.

Considerations in the critically ill ESRD patient

ESRD patients are admitted more frequently to intensive care units (ICUs) and have higher mortality risks than the general population, and the main causes of critical illness among ESRD patients are cardiovascular events, sepsis, and bleeding. Once in the ICU, hemodynamic stabilization and fluid-electrolyte management pose major challenges in oligoanuric patients. Selection of renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality is influenced by the outpatient modality and access, as well as severity of illness, renal provider experience, and ICU logistics. Currently, most patients receive intermittent hemodialysis or continuous RRT with temporary vascular access catheters. Acute peritoneal dialysis (PD) is less frequently utilized, and utility of outpatient PD is reduced after an ICU admission. Thus, preservation of current vascular accesses, while limiting venous system damage for future access creations, is relevant. Also, dosing of small-solute clearance with urea kinetic modeling is difficult and may be supplanted by novel online clearance techniques. Medication dosing, coordinated with delivered RRT, is essential for septic patients treated with antibiotics. A comprehensive, standardized approach by a multidisciplinary team of providers, including critical care specialists, nephrologists, and pharmacists, represents a nexus of care that can reduce readmission rates, morbidity, and mortality of vulnerable ESRD patients.

Patients with end-stage renal disease admitted to the intensive care unit: systematic review

The number of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing worldwide, with a growing demand on healthcare services. A systematic review of the literature was performed to determine the requirement for intensive care unit (ICU) services, reasons for admission, predictors of mortality, and short- and long-term outcomes of ESRD patients admitted to ICU. Sixteen studies were identified, comprising 6591 ICU admissions. Cardiovascular disease and sepsis accounted for the majority of admissions. Acute illness severity scores tend to overestimate mortality among ESRD patients. Critical illness associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) is associated with significantly higher hospital mortality compared with ESRD patients admitted to the ICU [odds ratio (OR) 3.9; 3.5-4.4; P<0.0001]. However, hospital mortality of ESRD patients is less favourable compared with matched patients with mild AKI (OR 1.5; 1.4-1.6; P<0.0001). Although the mortality rate remains high shortly after hospital discharge, the duration of increased mortality risk is unclear. Patients with ESRD frequently benefit from ICU admission, despite chronic co-morbidity. Further studies are required to modify and validate existing illness severity scores for ESRD patients admitted to the ICU, and to establish the duration of increased mortality risk after discharge from ICU.

Renal replacement therapy in the end-stage renal disease patient with critical illness

Dialysis patients account for 1-9% of all intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. As a result of the increasing prevalence of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and the changing demographics of this population, the number of dialysis patients requiring hospitalization and ICU support is expected to increase. Critically ill ESRD patients have more comorbidity and higher severity of illness than the general population resulting in higher ICU and in-hospital mortality rates. ESRD patients have been excluded from trials evaluating renal replacement therapy in the ICU, therefore little information is available about the optimal management of renal replacement therapy for dialysis patients in this setting. This review focuses on the epidemiology of chronic dialysis patients admitted to the ICU and discusses an approach to providing renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients with ESRD.

Dialysis patients and critical illness

Dialysis patients account for 1%-9% of all intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. As a result of the increasing prevalence of patients treated with long-term dialysis and the changing demographics of this population, the number of dialysis patients requiring hospitalization and ICU support is expected to increase. Critically ill dialysis patients have more comorbid conditions and higher severity of illness than the general population, resulting in higher ICU and in-hospital mortality rates, but lower than for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, suggesting that illness severity may contribute more to adverse outcomes than dialysis status. This review focuses on the epidemiology, prognosis, and short- and long-term outcomes of long-term dialysis patients admitted to the ICU, with data suggesting that dialysis patients have reasonable outcomes after ICU admission compared with the general population. It is important to recognize that illness severity and comorbid conditions rather than dialysis status account for much of the observed differences in short-term mortality rates. There are limited data to guide decision making regarding which dialysis patients may benefit from ICU admission, with common prognostic scoring systems routinely overestimating mortality in dialysis patients.

High rates of mortality and technique failure in peritoneal dialysis patients after critical illness

INTRODUCTION

Little is known regarding the causes and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). We explored the outcomes of technique failure and mortality in a cohort of PD patients admitted to the ICU.

METHODS

Using a provincial database of 990 incident PD patients followed from January 1997 to June 2009, we identified 90 (9%) who were admitted to the ICU. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate to determine differences in baseline characteristics. The Cox proportional hazards and competing risk methods were used to investigate associations.

RESULTS

Compared with other patients, those admitted to the ICU had been on PD longer (p < 0.0001) and were more often on continuous ambulatory PD (74.2% vs 25.8%, p = 0.016). Cardiac problems were the most common admitting diagnosis (50%), followed by sepsis (23%), with peritonitis accounting for 69% of the sepsis admissions. The 1-year mortality was 53.3%, with 12% alive and converted to hemodialysis, and one third remaining alive on PD. In multivariate Cox modeling, age [hazard ratio (HR): 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99 to 1.03], white blood cell count (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.04), temperature (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.92), and peritonitis (1.64; 95% CI: 1.21 to 2.22) at admission to the ICU were associated with the composite outcome of technique failure or death. In a competing risk analysis, the risk for death was 30%, and for technique failure, 36% at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on PD have high rates of death and technique failure after admission to the ICU.

Long-term outcomes of end-stage renal disease patients admitted to the ICU

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) have poor survival and high rates of readmission; however, little evidence exists on long-term outcomes. We set out to investigate the long-term (6 and 12 months) survival of ESRD patients admitted to the ICU and whether differential survival could be explained by dialysis modality and vascular access.

METHODS

We compared the admission characteristics, outcomes and readmission rates of 619 ESRD [95 peritoneal dialysis (PD), 334 hemodialysis with a catheter (HD CVC), 190 hemodialysis with an AV fistula (HD AVF)] patients admitted to 11 ICU's in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used as appropriate to determine differences in baseline characteristics. Multivariable Cox and logistic regression was used to assess outcomes between the groups.

RESULTS

The 6- and 12-month crude survival was 62 and 52%, respectively. In a univariate model, modality and vascular access were associated with an increased hazard ratio (HR) of death [PD HR 1.60 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-2.13, HD CVC HR 1.55 95% CI 1.25-1.93] compared to patients on HD with an AVF. In three different multivariate adjusted models, this association persisted with HRs for death of 1.63-1.75 for PD and 1.50-1.58 for HD CVC.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall long-term survival of ESRD patients after admission to the ICU is poor. Being on PD or being dialyzed with a catheter was independently associated with an increased mortality.

End-stage renal disease status and critical illness in the elderly

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Elderly patients (> 65 years old) are a rapidly growing demographic in the ESRD and intensive care unit (ICU) populations, yet the effect of ESRD status on critical illness in elderly patients remains unknown. Reliable estimates of prognosis would help to inform care and management of this frail and vulnerable population.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

The effect of ESRD status on survival and readmission rates was examined in a retrospective cohort of 14,650 elderly patients (>65 years old) admitted to 11 ICUs in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada between 2000 and 2006. Logistic regression models were used to adjust odds of mortality and readmission to ICU for baseline case mix and illness severity.

RESULTS

Elderly ESRD patients had twofold higher crude in-hospital mortality (22% versus 13%, P < 0.0001) and readmission rate (6.4 versus 2.7%, P = 0.001). After adjustment for illness severity alone or illness severity and case mix, the odds ratio for mortality decreased to 0.85 (95% CI: 0.57 to 1.25) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.55 to 1.23), respectively. In contrast, ESRD status remained significantly associated with readmission to ICU after adjustment for other risk factors (OR 2.06 [95% CI: 1.32, 3.22]).

CONCLUSIONS

Illness severity on admission, rather than ESRD status per se, appears to be the main driver of in-hospital mortality in elderly patients. However, ESRD status is an independent risk factor for early and late readmission, suggesting that this population might benefit from alternative strategies for ICU discharge.

Outcome of patients with end stage renal disease admitted to an intensive care unit in India

AIMS

We sought to determine outcome and evaluate performance of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores upon admission in predicting 30-day mortality of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients admitted in ICU.

METHODS

This prospective observational cohort study examined 73 consecutive ESRD patients admitted in an ICU of a tertiary care institute over 15 months. Primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Data on patient characteristics, reason for ICU admission, cause of ESRD, mode of renal replacement, and use of mechanical ventilation (MV) or inotropes were recorded. The APACHE 2 and SOFA scores were calculated based on admission characteristics.

RESULTS

First-day median APACHE II, SOFA, and APACHE II-predicted hospital mortality rates were 26 (14-49), 7 (4-17), and 56.9% (18.6-97.4%), respectively. Observed ICU and 30-day mortality rates were 27.4%, and 41.1%, respectively. During the ICU course, MV and inotropic support was required in 27 (37%) and 23 (35.1%) patients, respectively. Need for MV (p < 0.001) and inotropic support (p < 0.001) were predictors of 30-day mortality in univariate analysis. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve for APACHE II in predicting 30-day mortality was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.76-0.93) compared with 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-0.97) for SOFA score (p = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome of ESRD patients admitted to ICU is poor, especially if they require other organ support. APACHE II and SOFA scores perform well as predictors of 30-day mortality.

Outcomes of chronic dialysis patients admitted to the intensive care unit

Admission rates and outcomes of patients who have ESRD and are admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) are not well defined. We conducted a historical cohort study using a prospective regional ICU database that captured all 11 adult ICUs in Winnipeg, Canada. Between 2000 and 2006, there were 34,965 total admissions to the ICU, 1173 (3.4%) of which were patients with ESRD. The main admission diagnoses among patients with ESRD were cardiac disease (31%), sepsis (15%), and arrest (10%). Compared with other patients in the ICU, those with ESRD were significantly younger but had more diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, and higher APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) scores; mean length of stay in the ICU was similar, however, between these two groups. Restricting the analysis to first admissions to the ICU, unadjusted in-hospital mortality was higher for patients with ESRD (16 versus 11%; P < 0.0001), but this difference did not persist after adjustment for baseline illness severity. In conclusion, although ESRD associates with increased mortality among patients who are admitted to the ICU, this effect is mostly a result of comorbidity.

Long-term survival of chronic dialysis patients following survival from an episode of multiple-organ failure

Introduction

This study aimed to examine the long-term outcome for patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF) who survived multiple-organ failure.

Methods

We performed a review of databases from the renal medicine service and intensive care units (ICU) of the participating hospitals within Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. Patients with ESRF admitted to ICU who required support of two or more organ systems or were ventilated for more than 36 hours were included. To provide a comparison we examined the survival of a comparator group of ESRF patients in the general population with similar demographic and disease characteristics to our study group. We also examined the outcome for ESRF patients admitted to ICU who died prior to discharge.

Results

Survival data for two years following discharge from ICU were examined for the impact of age, prior dialysis history, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores and medical or surgical status. Of the 199 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 111 (56%) survived their ICU stay. Sixty-two (56%) of the survivors remained alive two years following discharge. There was no group difference in survival with regards to age, dialysis history or APACHE II scores. Those admitted with a medical rather than surgical diagnosis were less likely to survive two years (P < 0.01). Patients who died in ICU had higher APACHE II scores (P < 0.0001) and were more likely to have a medical diagnosis. By log rank analysis two-year mortality was significantly higher (P = 0.003) in the ICU survivors than the comparator group with ESRF. This difference was lost when patients who died within a month of discharge were excluded.

Conclusions

ESRF patients with multiple-organ failure have a high mortality, with the increased risk of death continuing into the early post-ICU period. Those with non-surgical diagnoses have the highest risk. Survival within the group who live beyond the early post-ICU period appears similar to the background population of ESRF patients.

Sustained low-efficiency dialysis versus continuous veno-venous hemofiltration for postsurgical acute renal failure

BACKGROUND

In postsurgical acute renal failure patients with moderate unstable hemodynamics or fluid overload, the choice of dialysis modality is difficult. This study was performed to compare the outcomes between the sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) and continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) in these patients.

METHODS

Sequential postsurgical acute renal failure patients undergoing acute dialysis with CVVH (2002-2003), or SLED (2004-2005) as a result of severe fluid overload or moderately unstable hemodynamics were analyzed. Multivariate analyses of comorbidity, disease severity before initiating dialysis, biochemical measurements, and hemodynamic parameters for 3 days after the first dialysis session were performed by fitting multiple logistic regression models to predict patient's 30-day after hospital discharge (AHD) mortality.

RESULTS

Among the 101 recruited patients, 38 received SLED and the rest received CVVH. The 30-day AHD mortality was 62.4%. The independent risk factors of 30-day AHD mortality included older age (P = .008), lower first postdialysis mean arterial pressure (MAP) (P = .021), higher first postdialysis blood urea nitrogen level (P = .009), and absence of a history of hypertension (P = .002). A further linear regression analysis found that dialysis using SLED was associated with higher first postdialysis MAP (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Among the postsurgical patients requiring acute dialysis with severe fluid overload or moderately unstable hemodynamics, the patients treated with SLED had a higher first postdialysis MAP than those treated with CVVH, which led to lower mortality. Further multicenter randomized clinical trials of larger sample size are needed to compare the effects of SLED and CVVH on the outcomes of postsurgical acute dialysis patients.

Outcomes of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury and end-stage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapy: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with those of matched controls of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring renal replacement therapy.

METHODS

A case-control study was performed at the intensive care units (ICU) of three tertiary-care hospitals between December 2004 and September 2007. Patients were admitted with life-threatening complications and were matched for age and for severity of illness and organ dysfunctions. Conditional logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients with ESRD and 54 patients with AKI were eligible for the study and were well matched. In general, clinical characteristics were similar. Nonetheless, comorbidities were more frequent in patients with ESRD, and patients with AKI more frequently required mechanical ventilation. ICU (43% versus 20%, P = 0.023) and hospital (50% versus 24%, P = 0.010) mortality rates were higher in patients with AKI. In addition, patients with AKI experienced longer ICU and hospitals stays. The SAPS II score had a regular ability in discriminating survivors and non-survivors, and tended to underestimate mortality in patients with AKI and overestimate in patients with ESRD. When all patients were evaluated, older age [OR = 1.05 (95% CI, 1.01-1.09)], poor chronic health status [OR = 3.90(1.19-12.82)] and number of associated organ failures [OR = 4.44(1.97-10.00)] were the main independent predictors of mortality. After adjusting for those covariates, ESRD was still associated with a lower probability of death [OR = 0.17 (0.06-0.050)].

CONCLUSIONS

ESRD patients with life-threatening complications had significantly better outcome than AKI patients.

End-stage renal disease patients on renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit: short- and long-term outcome

OBJECTIVE

The number of patients with end-stage renal disease has increased during the last decades. Data shows that 10% of the renal replacement therapy population in the intensive care unit are patients with end-stage renal disease. We aimed to describe the short- and long-term outcome of these patients after renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit.

DESIGN

Nationwide cohort study between the years 1995 and 2004. Follow-up up to 5 years.

SETTING

Swedish general intensive care units and Swedish hospitals.

PATIENTS

Eligible subjects were end-stage renal disease patients treated with renal replacement therapy in 32 Swedish general intensive care units. In total, 245 patients were studied.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Short- and long-term mortality was studied. Logistic regression was used to analyze short-term mortality. Long-term mortality was compared with the mortality of end-stage renal disease patients outside the intensive care unit and the mortality in the population. Diabetes and heart failure are significant risk factors for 90-day mortality, with an odds ratio of 1.9 and 2.0, respectively. The intensive care unit end-stage renal disease cohort had increased long-term mortality as compared with non-intensive care unit end-stage renal disease patients, relative risk of death 2.32 (confidence interval 1.84-2.92). A comparison with the mortality rate in the general population yielded a standardized mortality ratio of 25 (95% confidence interval: 19.6-31.4).

CONCLUSIONS

For end-stage renal disease patients in the intensive care unit, age, diabetes mellitus, and heart failure are risk factors for 90-day mortality. Long-term mortality is associated with age and heart failure. The long-term mortality of end-stage renal disease patients surviving the intensive care unit stay is significantly higher compared with end-stage renal disease patients without a known intensive care unit admission.

Outcomes for dialysis patients with end-stage renal failure admitted to an intensive care unit or high dependency unit

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes for chronic dialysis patients requiring admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) or high dependency unit (HDU).

DESIGN

Retrospective audit of prospectively collected data from local and national databases.

SETTING

The ICU and HDU at a tertiary referral hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

70 chronic dialysis patients admitted between 2001 and 2006.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Unit and hospital mortality, recurrent admission patterns and median survival after discharge from hospital.

RESULTS

For patients' last admissions, mortality in the ICU or HDU was 17% and in hospital was 29%. The 12 deaths in the ICU or HDU occurred a median of 18 hours (range, 3-203 hours) after admission, reflecting the severity of their underlying illness. The independent predictors of death in hospital were age and the number of non-renal organ systems failing. Patients with pulmonary oedema had a lower risk of death than patients admitted for other reasons. Although 21 patients accounted for 55 of 104 admissions (53%), recurrent admissions to the ICU or HDU generally occurred during different hospital admissions. They were not associated with a higher risk of death in hospital. Patients discharged home had a median survival of 2.25 years, and a median survival of 3.5 years from starting dialysis. The median survival for patients on dialysis in Australia in general is 4.5 years (Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry).

CONCLUSION

Dialysis patients discharged home after an ICU or HDU admission have survival similar to that of Australian dialysis patients generally.

Haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients admitted to intensive care units

Hutchison and colleagues report a 10-year experience of dialysis patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in the UK excluding Scotland. Their study is the largest published so far and raises issues of interest to both ICU physicians and nephrologists. Overall, the dialysis patients, although sicker on admission and having pre-existing co-morbidities, do as well as other ICU patients. Their clinical progress after leaving the ICU, however, is less good than for other ICU patients, raising the possibility that the patients might be leaving too early, or perhaps that dialysis patients should be discharged to a high-dependency unit rather than go direct to a renal ward. All in all, the paper by Hutchison and colleagues provides a useful foundation for planning the critical care management of dialysis patients in the UK and elsewhere.

Case mix, outcome and activity for patients admitted to intensive care units requiring chronic renal dialysis: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database

INTRODUCTION

This report describes the case mix, outcome and activity for admissions to intensive care units (ICUs) of patients who require prior chronic renal dialysis for end-stage renal failure (ESRF), and investigates the effect of case mix factors on outcome.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a high-quality clinical database, namely the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC) Case Mix Programme Database, which includes 276,731 admissions to 170 adult ICUs across England, Wales and Northern Ireland from 1995 to 2004.

RESULTS

During the eight year study period, 1.3% (n = 3,420) of all patients admitted to ICU were receiving chronic renal dialysis before ICU admission. This represents an estimated ICU utilization of six admissions (32 bed-days) per 100 dialysis patient-years. The ESRF group was younger (mean age 57.3 years versus 59.5 years) and more likely to be male (60.2% versus 57.9%) than those without ESRF. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and Acute Physiology Score revealed greater severity of illness on admission in patients with ESRF (mean 24.7 versus 16.6 and 17.2 versus 12.6, respectively). Length of stay in ICU was comparable between groups (median 1.9 days versus 1.8 days) and ICU mortality was only slightly elevated in the ESRF group (26.3% versus 20.8%). However, the ESRF group had protracted overall hospital stay (median 25 days versus 17 days), and increased hospital mortality (45.3% versus 31.2%) and ICU readmission (9.0% vs. 4.7%). Multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for case mix identified the increased hospital mortality to be associated with increasing age, emergency surgery and nonsurgical cases, cardiopulmonary resuscitation before ICU admission and extremes of physiological norms. The adjusted odds ratio for ultimate hospital mortality associated with chronic renal dialysis was 1.24 (95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.37).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ESRF admitted to UK ICUs are more likely to be male and younger, with a medical cause of admission, and to have greater severity of illness than the non-ESRF population. Outcomes on the ICU were comparable between the two groups, but those patients with ESRF had greater readmission rates, prolonged post-ICU hospital stay and increased post-ICU hospital mortality. This study is by far the largest comparative outcome analysis to date in patients with ESRF admitted to the ICU. It may help to inform clinical decision-making and resource requirements for this patient population.

A five-year, retrospective, comparison review of survival in neurosurgical patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism and treated with either inferior vena cava filters or anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

[corrected] The optimal role of inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) in the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to compare mortality risk for VTE patients treated with IVCF or anticoagulants.

METHODS

Analyses were based on data from 175 VTE patients, who had concurrent conditions of central nervous system (CNS) cancer or brain hemorrhage, and who were seen at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital between 1998 and 2002. Patients who received filters (n = 136) and those who were treated with anticoagulants only (n = 39) were compared on in-hospital mortality via logistic regression and on overall mortality via survival analyses methods.

RESULTS

A total of 17 study patients (9.7%) died in-hospital. After controlling for patient sociodemographic, medical, and treatment characteristics, the filter group had a 65% reduction of risk compared to the anticoagulant group (adjusted odds ratio, OR = 0.36, P = 0.138). Age, renal disease, and ventriculoperitoneal shunt/ventriculostomy were independent predictors of higher in-hospital mortality. A total of 128 deaths (73.1%) were recorded during the study's entire follow-up period. Unadjusted median survival was 21 weeks for the filter group and 11 weeks for the anticoagulant group (P = 0.177). In adjusted analyses, the filter group had a 28% reduction of risk compared to the anticoagulant group (adjusted hazard ratio, HR = 0.72, P = 0.181). Caucasian race and CNS cancer were independent predictors of higher overall mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither in-hospital nor overall mortality differences between the two treatment groups was significant, although we found some indication of a beneficial effect of filter placement with respect to short-term, in-hospital survival.

Prolonged coma from refractory status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

Status epilepticus is a life-threatening medical condition. In its most severe form, refractory status epilepticus (RSE) seizures may not respond to first and second-line anti-epileptic drugs. RSE is associated with a high mortality and significant medical complications in survivors with prolonged hospitalizations.

METHODS

We describe the clinical course of RSE in the setting of new onset lupus in a 31-year-old male who required prolonged barbiturate coma.

RESULTS

Seizure stopped on day 64 of treatment. Prior to the resolution of seizures, discussion around withdrawal of care took place between the physicians and patient's family. Medical care was continued because of the patient's age, normal serial MRI studies, and the patient's reversible medical condition.

CONCLUSION

Few evidence-based data exist to guide management of RSE. Our case emphasizes the need for continuous aggressive therapy when neuroimaging remains normal.