Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-stent Restenosis

Development of a Clinical and Ultrasonic Parameter-Based Nomogram Model to Predict Restenosis after Superficial Femoral Artery Stenting

BACKGROUND

Prediction of in-stent restenosis (ISR) is clinically important for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) in superficial femoral artery (SFA) who have been treated with stenting. The aim of this study was to construct and validate a predictive model for ISR after SFA stenting based on a series of clinical and ultrasonic parameters.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 381 patients who were treated with self-expanding bare nitinol stents in their SFA at our hospital between January 1, 2018, and January 1, 2022. These patients were randomly allocated to a training cohort (266 patients) or a validation cohort (115). Clinical and ultrasonic parameters related to ISR (>50%) in the SFA at 12 months were derived by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to create a nomogram model predictive of risk of ISR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to assess the recognition ability of the model. A calibration curve was used to evaluate the model's calibration ability, and decision curve analysis was used to validate the nomogram's clinical utility.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analyses showed that sex, echogenicity of the target plaque, preoperative arterial runoff score, preoperative popliteal artery flow rate, lesion length, and residual diameter were risk factors for ISR; these parameters were used to construct the nomogram model. Internal and external validation showed that the areas under the ROC curves were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.87) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.60-0.79), respectively, suggesting good recognition ability of the model. Additionally, calibration curves for the predictive model indicated good calibration, and the decision curve analysis demonstrated clinical utility of the model.

CONCLUSION

This novel nomogram that predicts ISR after SFA stenting demonstrated excellent discriminatory power, calibration capacity, and clinical usefulness.

Real-World Performance of Excimer Laser Ablation Combined with Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis Disease

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess the effectiveness and identify the risk factors associated with postoperative restenosis in patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (FP-ISR) disease treated with excimer laser ablation (ELA) combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus DCB alone.

METHODS

This retrospective real-world study compares patients with FP-ISR treated with ELA + DCB versus DCB alone. Additionally, subgroup analysis was conducted for long-segment lesions (lesion length ≥200 mm) and Tosaka III lesions. Then Cox regression analysis was used to examine 24-month outcomes of target lesion revascularization and restenosis.

RESULTS

We found no significant differences in primary patency and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) at 24 months between the ELA + DCB group (49 patients) and the DCB group (82 patients). In the subgroup analysis of long-segment lesions (target lesion length ≥200 mm), the results showed that ELA + DCB was superior to DCB at 24 months in terms of both primary patency (55.0% vs 35.3%; P = 0.048) and freedom from CD-TLR (77.8% vs 50.8%; P = 0.033). The 2 treatment methods did not show statistical significance in the subgroup analysis of Tosaka III patients. Target lesion length of ≥200 mm was found to have a significant association with restenosis (hazard ratio = 5.28; 95% CI, 2.48-11.23; P < 0.001) and freedom from CD-TLR (hazard ratio = 3.02; 95% CI, 1.02-9.30; P = 0.044) in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We do not have sufficient evidence to show a significant difference between ELA + DCB and DCB alone for FP-ISR. However, for patients with long-segment FP-ISR lesions, ELA + DCB may provide better long-term patency.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Our results suggest that for patients with long-segment (≥200 mm) FP-ISR, the efficacy of ELA combined with DCB may be superior to that of DCB alone. For patients with FP-ISR <200 mm, DCB alone may achieve satisfactory efficacy, thus reducing the medical burden on patients and allowing for the selection of more appropriate treatment options for different types of lesions.

International Cross-Sectional Survey ON TReatment Of Occluded Femoro-Popliteal Stents (SUNROOF)

PURPOSE

The aim of this project is to explore practice patterns of experienced vascular specialists involved in the treatment of patients with arterial femoro-popliteal in-stent occlusion (ISO) and to understand key concepts and shared thoughts, throughout an international cross-sectional survey.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The web-based survey was in English and included 31 questions. One-hundred experts were invited by email to fill in the survey anonymously on Google Forms using a dedicated link. Reminders were sent after the first 2 weeks. In addition to reporting of pooled responses, subanalyses of answers were also performed, according to country of origin (European vs non-European), years of experience (≤20 years vs >20 years), and type of institution (Academic/University vs Non-academic/Private).

RESULTS

A total of 77 physicians from 22 countries completed the survey. Most responders were males (70/77, 91%). Most of the participants were vascular surgeons (58/77, 75%). Endovascular therapy was the preferred option in patients presenting with either acute limb ischemia, disabling intermittent claudication, or chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Atherectomy/thrombectomy+Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) was the preferred endovascular modality (32/77, 42%). No differences between country of origin, years of experience, and type of institution of the participants were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The international SUrvey oN TReatment Of Occluded Femoro-Popliteal Stent (SUNROOF) survey has suggested that endovascular therapy is the preferred method for the treatment of femoro-popliteal ISO. This survey could represent a good starting point for future research on comparison between open and endovascular approach and different devices, which currently lacks good-level scientific evidence and appropriate guidelines.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The international SUNROOF survey included 31 questions. It was performed by 77 vascular physicians from 22 countries. More than a half of respondents considered an endovascular approach as the preferred treatment modality in acute limb ischemia, disabling intermittent claudication, or chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Most responders agreed they would intensify the follow-up protocol and anti-thrombotic medications regimen after a first in-stent occlusion episode. This survey could represent a good starting point for future research on comparison between open and endovascular approach and different devices, which currently lacks of good level scientific evidence and appropriate guidelines.

Comparative Study between Mechanical Rotational Atherectomy Combined with Drug-Coated Balloon versus Drug-Coated Balloon Alone for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis during Peripheral Endovascular Interventions: A Multicentric Trial

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous mechanical debulking (PMD) using mechanical rotational atherectomy combined with paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus using paclitaxel DCB alone in the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Material and Methods: This is a multicentric retrospective observational study conducted over a period of 2 years from 2020 to 2022. The study included 49 patients presented with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) associated with in-stent restenosis, either acute (<14 days), subacute (<3 months) or chronic (>3 months). The enrolled patients underwent endovascular revascularization using either PMD combined with paclitaxel DCB or paclitaxel DCB only. They were followed up for 6 months after the intervention clinically and by duplex evaluation. Results: The lesion length was about 14.2 mm in the group treated by PMD+ DCB and 9.3 mm in the group treated by DCB alone. The technical success rate was the same between the two groups. However, the follow-up after 6 months showed that patencies for PMD + DCB and DCB alone were 15 (68.2%) patients and 15 (55.6%) patients, respectively (significant p value = 0.028). Procedural-related complications for PMD + DCB are distal embolization (9%) of cases and no vessel perforation. Regarding the candidates who were treated by DCB alone, there were minor groin hematomas (11.1%), distal arterial thrombosis (11.1%) and contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) (11.1%) cases. Conclusion: The endovascular management of in-stent restenosis using percutaneous mechanical debulking (PMD) in conjunction with paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) showed that PMD combined with DCB is a safe and effective modality for achieving recanalization. It gives a satisfactory outcome in terms of technical success, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization rate (CD-TLR) and mortality. Despite these promising results, further research with a large enrolled population may be required to determine the cost/benefit.

Meta-analysis of outcomes from drug-eluting stent implantation in femoropopliteal arteries

OBJECTIVE

In recent years, studies of drug-eluting stent (DES) for femoropopliteal artery diseases (FPADs) have been gradually published. To explore whether this type of stent is superior to the traditional bare metal stent (BMS), we performed this study.

METHODS

A systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), and Cochrane Library was performed on November 29, 2022. We innovatively adopted the hazard ratio (HR), the most appropriate indicator, as a measure of the outcomes that fall under the category of time-to-event data. The HRs was extracted directly or indirectly. Then, the meta-analyses using random effects model were performed. The bias risks of included papers were assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. This study was registered on the PROSPER platform (CRD42023391944) and not funded.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs involving 1,889 participants were found. After pooled analyses, we obtained results without propensity on each of the following 3 outcomes of interest: in-stent restenosis (ISR) -free survival, primary patency (PP) survival, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) -free survival (P >0.05, respectively). Because the results of pooled analyses of the other two outcomes of interest (all-cause death free survival and clinical benefit survival) had high heterogeneity both, they were not accepted by us.

CONCLUSION

For FPADs, the DES has not yet demonstrated superiority or inferiority to BMS, in the ability to maintain PP, avoid ISR and TLR.

Predicting 1-year in-stent restenosis in superficial femoral arteries through multiscale computational modelling

In-stent restenosis in superficial femoral arteries (SFAs) is a complex, multi-factorial and multiscale vascular adaptation process whose thorough understanding is still lacking. Multiscale computational agent-based modelling has recently emerged as a promising approach to decipher mechanobiological mechanisms driving the arterial response to the endovascular intervention. However, the long-term arterial response has never been investigated with this approach, although being of fundamental relevance. In this context, this study investigates the 1-year post-operative arterial wall remodelling in three patient-specific stented SFA lesions through a fully coupled multiscale agent-based modelling framework. The framework integrates the effects of local haemodynamics and monocyte gene expression data on cellular dynamics through a bi-directional coupling of computational fluid dynamics simulations with an agent-based model of cellular activities. The framework was calibrated on the follow-up data at 1 month and 6 months of one stented SFA lesion and then applied to the other two lesions. The calibrated framework successfully captured (i) the high lumen area reduction occurring within the first post-operative month and (ii) the stabilization of the median lumen area from 1-month to 1-year follow-ups in all the stented lesions, demonstrating the potentialities of the proposed approach for investigating patient-specific short- and long-term responses to endovascular interventions.

Endovascular Treatment and Outcomes for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis: Insights from the XLPAD Registry

Background

There is limited "real-world" evidence examining treatment modalities and outcomes in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease undergoing endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal (FP) in-stent restenosis (ISR).

Materials and Methods

We compared outcomes in 2,895 patients from the XLPAD registry (NCT01904851) between 2006 and 2019 treated for FP ISR (n = 347) and non-ISR (n = 2,548) lesions. Primary endpoint included major adverse limb events (MALE) at 1 year, a composite of all-cause death, target limb repeat revascularization, or major amputation.

Results

ISR patients were more frequently on antiplatelet (94.5% vs 89.4%, p=0.007) and statin (68.9% vs 60.3%, p=0.003) therapies. Lesion length was similar (ISR: 145 ± 99 mm vs. non-ISR: 142 ± 99 mm, p=0.55). Fewer treated ISR lesions were chronic total occlusions (47.3% vs. 53.7%, p=0.02) and severely calcified (22.4% vs. 44.7%, p < 0.001). Atherectomy (63.5% vs. 45.0%, p < 0.001) and drug-coated balloons (DCB; 4.7% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001) were more frequently used in ISR lesions. The distal embolization rate was higher in ISR lesions (2.4% vs. 0.9%, p=0.02). Repeat revascularization (21.5% vs. 16.7%, p=0.04; Figure) was higher and freedom from MALE at 1 year was significantly lower (87% vs. 92.5%, p < 0.001) in the ISR group.

Conclusion

Atherectomy and DCB are more frequently used to treat FP ISR lesions. Patients with FP ISR have more intraprocedural distal embolization, higher repeat revascularization procedures, and lower freedom from MALE at 1 year.

A predictive multiscale model of in-stent restenosis in femoral arteries: linking haemodynamics and gene expression with an agent-based model of cellular dynamics

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a maladaptive inflammatory-driven response of femoral arteries to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent deployment, leading to lumen re-narrowing as consequence of excessive cellular proliferative and synthetic activities. A thorough understanding of the underlying mechanobiological factors contributing to ISR is still lacking. Computational multiscale models integrating both continuous- and agent-based approaches have been identified as promising tools to capture key aspects of the complex network of events encompassing molecular, cellular and tissue response to the intervention. In this regard, this work presents a multiscale framework integrating the effects of local haemodynamics and monocyte gene expression data on cellular dynamics to simulate ISR mechanobiological processes in a patient-specific model of stented superficial femoral artery. The framework is based on the coupling of computational fluid dynamics simulations (haemodynamics module) with an agent-based model (ABM) of cellular activities (tissue remodelling module). Sensitivity analysis and surrogate modelling combined with genetic algorithm optimization were adopted to explore the model behaviour and calibrate the ABM parameters. The proposed framework successfully described the patient lumen area reduction from baseline to one-month follow-up, demonstrating the potential capabilities of this approach in predicting the short-term arterial response to the endovascular procedure.

In-Stent Restenosis Progression in Human Superficial Femoral Arteries: Dynamics of Lumen Remodeling and Impact of Local Hemodynamics

In-stent restenosis (ISR) represents a major drawback of stented superficial femoral arteries (SFAs). Motivated by the high incidence and limited knowledge of ISR onset and development in human SFAs, this study aims to (i) analyze the lumen remodeling trajectory over 1-year follow-up period in human stented SFAs and (ii) investigate the impact of altered hemodynamics on ISR initiation and progression. Ten SFA lesions were reconstructed at four follow-ups from computed tomography to quantify the lumen area change occurring within 1-year post-intervention. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed at each follow-up to relate wall shear stress (WSS) based descriptors with lumen remodeling. The largest lumen remodeling was found in the first post-operative month, with slight regional-specific differences (larger inward remodeling in the fringe segments, p < 0.05). Focal re-narrowing frequently occurred after 6 months. Slight differences in the lumen area change emerged between long and short stents, and between segments upstream and downstream from stent overlapping portions, at specific time intervals. Abnormal patterns of multidirectional WSS were associated with lumen remodeling within 1-year post-intervention. This longitudinal study gave important insights into the dynamics of ISR and the impact of hemodynamics on ISR progression in human SFAs.

Baseline local hemodynamics as predictor of lumen remodeling at 1-year follow-up in stented superficial femoral arteries

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is the major drawback of superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenting. Abnormal hemodynamics after stent implantation seems to promote the development of ISR. Accordingly, this study aims to investigate the impact of local hemodynamics on lumen remodeling in human stented SFA lesions. Ten SFA models were reconstructed at 1-week and 1-year follow-up from computed tomography images. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed to relate the local hemodynamics at 1-week, expressed in terms of time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index and relative residence time, with the lumen remodeling at 1-year, quantified as the change of lumen area between 1-week and 1-year. The TAWSS was negatively associated with the lumen area change (ρ = - 0.75, p = 0.013). The surface area exposed to low TAWSS was positively correlated with the lumen area change (ρ = 0.69, p = 0.026). No significant correlations were present between the other hemodynamic descriptors and lumen area change. The low TAWSS was the best predictive marker of lumen remodeling (positive predictive value of 44.8%). Moreover, stent length and overlapping were predictor of ISR at follow-up. Despite the limited number of analyzed lesions, the overall findings suggest an association between abnormal patterns of WSS after stenting and lumen remodeling.

Percutaneous mechanical atherothrombectomy using the Rotarex®S device in peripheral artery in-stent restenosis or occlusion: a French retrospective multicenter study on 128 patients

Background

To ascertain the safety and mid-term outcomes of Rotarex^®S rotational atherectomy plus thrombectomy device (Straub Medical AG, Wangs, Switzerland) with or without adjunctive treatment (e.g., percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, PTA/drug-coated balloon, DCB/stenting) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) or occlusion in the iliac and/or infrainguinal arteries.

Methods

French multicenter retrospective study of all patients treated by in-stent percutaneous mechanical debulking (PMD) of the lower limbs with Rotarex^®S device between January 2013 and November 2018.

Results

The cohort consisted of 128 patients (88 men and 40 women), aged 39-94 years (mean, 66.7±12 years). All patients presented with cardio-vascular risk factors. Overall, 51.5% of patients had critical limb ischemia. The study demonstrated a technical success of 96.9% in the population with PMD and adjunctive PTA (95/128, 74.2%) or adjunctive DCB (16/128, 12.5%) or both (13/128, 10.2%). At 12-months follow-up, the primary clinical success/patency rate was 92.3% and the secondary clinical success/patency rate was 91.4%. Rate of limb salvage was 93.7%. Overall 32 (25%) reinterventions were reported with mean time from Rotarex^®S treatment to reintervention of 7.1±8.2 months. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 19.5% (25/128). Seven (5.5%) patients developed distal embolism that responded to endovascular treatment. At mean follow-up, major adverse events (MAE) observed were death (18/128, 14.1%), myocardial infarction (MI) (9/128, 7.0%), stroke (2/128, 1.6%) and renal failure (3/128, 2.3%).

Conclusions

Recanalization with Rotarex^®S rotational atherectomy plus thrombectomy device is a practical choice for arterial ISR/occlusions of the iliac and/or infrainguinal arteries, regardless of the age of the thrombus, with satisfying TLR. Only adjunctive PTA is often necessary to further improve the recanalization.

Combination of Rotarex Thrombectomy and Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-Stent Restenosis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment method for femoropopliteal (FP) artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains controversial. We assess the efficacy and safety of combination of Rotarex thrombectomy and drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of FP ISR.

METHODS

From June 2016 to July 2017, 32 patients with FP ISR who underwent combination of Rotarex thrombectomy and DCB angioplasty were included in a prospective registry. The primary end point was primary patency of the target lesion defined as a peak systolic velocity ratio <2.4 documented by duplex ultrasound at 12 months without clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). The secondary outcome measure was the rate of major adverse limb events. The primary functional end point was assessed using the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine (90.6%) patients completed 12-month follow-up. Mean ankle-brachial index was 0.45 ± 0.14 at baseline and 0.84 ± 0.12 at 12 months (P < 0.05). The WIQ score was 30.45 ± 21.14 at baseline and 52.68 ± 29.75 at 12 months (P < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the primary patency rate at 12 months was 86.2% (25/29), and freedom from CD-TLR rate at 12 months was 89.7% (26/29).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that combination of Rotarex thrombectomy and DCB for treatment of FP ISR is safe and effective with satisfying primary patency rate and freedom from CD-TLR rate at 12-month follow-up.