Consensus Recommendations for the Clinical Application of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the Treatment of Depression

Optimally combining transcranial magnetic stimulation with antidepressants in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and Meta-analysis

There is a critical knowledge gap in optimally combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and antidepressants to treat patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). TMS is effective in treating MDD in patients who have failed at least one antidepressant trial, with accelerated protocols showing faster remission in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Although clinicians routinely augment antidepressants with TMS, there is a knowledge gap in stopping versus continuing antidepressants or the dosing strategies when starting or tapering TMS. These considerations are important when considering maintenance TMS (delivered alone or in combination with suitable antidepressants) to maintain remission in MDD after the index course of TMS. As the first step towards filling this knowledge gap, we reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and open-label trials from 2 databases (PubMed/Medline and EMBASE) that compared active TMS combined with a pre-specified antidepressant dosed in the same manner for adults with MDD versus sham TMS combined with the same antidepressant as in the active arm. All studies were published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2023. We excluded case reports, case series, and clinical studies that augmented TMS with antidepressants and vice versa. We found 10 RCTs (n = 654 participants) and performed a meta-analysis. This showed active TMS combined with pre-specified antidepressants had greater efficacy for MDD treatment than sham TMS combined with the same antidepressants as in the active arm (Hedge's g = 1; 95 % CI [0.27, 1.73]). The review and meta-analysis indicate greater short-term efficacy in combining antidepressants with TMS from the get-go in MDD. Given the increasing role of accelerated TMS protocols in expediting remission in MDD and the results of our meta-analysis, we advocate for RCTs examining the short-term and long-term effects of various antidepressant classes on these TMS protocols in MDD. This can also optimize and individualize maintenance TMS protocols to prevent relapse in MDD.

Cost-utility analysis of adjunct repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment resistant bipolar depression

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as an adjunct to standard care from an Australian health sector perspective, compared to standard care alone for adults with treatment-resistant bipolar depression (TRBD).

METHODS

An economic model was developed to estimate the cost per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for rTMS added to standard care compared to standard care alone, for adults with TRBD. The model simulated the time in three health states (mania, depression, residual) over one year. Response to rTMS was sourced from a meta-analysis, converted to a relative risk and used to modify the time in the depressed state. Uncertainty and sensitivity tested the robustness of results.

RESULTS

Base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were $72,299 per DALY averted (95 % Uncertainty Interval (UI): $60,915 to $86,668) and $46,623 per QALY gained (95 % UI: $39,676 - $55,161). At a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $96,000 per DALY averted, the base-case had a 100 % probability of being marginally cost-effective. At a WTP threshold of $64,000 per QALY gained, the base-case had a 100 % probability of being cost-effective. Sensitivity analyses decreasing the number of sessions provided, increasing the disability weight or the time spent in the depression state for standard care improved the ICERs for rTMS.

CONCLUSIONS

Dependent on the outcome measure utilised and assumptions, rTMS would be considered a very cost-effective or marginally cost-effective adjunct to standard care for TRBD compared to standard care alone.

Does deep TMS really works for smoking cessation? A prospective, double blind, randomized, sham controlled study

INTRODUCTION

A substantial proportion of smokers wishing to quit do not stop smoking when using current therapies to aid cessation. Magnetic pulses to specific brain areas designated as transcranial magnetic stimulation may modulate brain activity and thereby change chemical dependencies. Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) with the H4 coil stimulates neuronal pathways in the lateral prefrontal cortex and insula bilaterally, areas involved in tobacco addiction.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dTMS with T4 coil in smoking cessation.

METHODS

In a double blind, controlled clinical trial, adult smokers of at least 10 cigarettes/day were randomized to active (n = 50) versus sham dTMS (n = 50). The protocol involved up to 21 sessions administered over up to 12 weeks. Tobacco use was monitored by self-report and confirmed by expired air monoximetry (at each dTMS visit) and blood cotinine (at the screening visit and at the end of sessions). Participants completed abstinence, mood and cognition scales at determined timepoints during follow-up.

RESULTS

In the intention to-treat-analysis, the cessation rate of the intervention and control groups was 14.0%. The reported side effects were as expected for this procedure. Although there were no serious adverse events, three participants were withdrawn according to safety criteria.

CONCLUSION

Active treatment with dTMS H4 coil was safe but not effective for smoking cessation.

A real-world retrospective cohort study comparing two bilateral stimulation protocols of add-on rTMS in patients with treatment resistant depression and severe anxiety

BACKGROUND

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been shown to improve response and remission in patients with treatment resistant depression. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of two bilateral rTMS protocols with different protocols in patients with treatment resistant depression and comorbid severe anxiety.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study involving 67 patients who underwent two different bilateral TMS protocols and who met the specified eligibility criteria was conducted. Group 1 received stimulation with 85% RMT intermittent theta burst (iTBS) in the left DLPFC + 120% RMT (1 Hz) in the right DLPFC. Group 2 received stimulation with 100% RMT (iTBS) in the left DLPFC + 110% RMT (1 Hz) in the left DLPFC.

RESULTS

After the magnetic stimulation treatment, 55% (n=22) achieved response to depression symptoms in group 1 and 62% (n=18) in group 2. Remission of depression symptoms was achieved in 13% in group 1 (n=5) and 24% in group 2 (n=7). There were no significant differences between the two protocols after TMS CONCLUSIONS: Different bilateral protocol parameters in individuals undergoing TMS may have an impact on symptom response and remission. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed.

Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for adolescents with treatment-resistant depression: A preliminary dose-finding study exploring safety and clinical effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) that modulates neural activity. Deep TMS (dTMS) can target not only cortical but also deeper limbic structures implicated in depression. Although TMS has demonstrated safety in adolescents, dTMS has yet to be applied to adolescent TRD.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

This pilot study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and clinical effects of dTMS in adolescents with TRD. We hypothesized dTMS would be safe, tolerable, and efficacious for adolescent TRD.

METHODS

15 adolescents with TRD (Age, years: M = 16.4, SD = 1.42) completed a six-week daily dTMS protocol targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BrainsWay H1 coil, 30 sessions, 10 Hz, 3.6 s train duration, 20s inter-train interval, 55 trains; 1980 total pulses per session, 80 % to 120 % of motor threshold). Participants completed clinical, safety, and neurocognitive assessments before and after treatment. The primary outcome was depression symptom severity measured by the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R).

RESULTS

14 out of 15 participants completed the dTMS treatments. One participant experienced a convulsive syncope; the other participants only experienced mild side effects (e.g., headaches). There were no serious adverse events and minimal to no change in cognitive performance. Depression symptom severity significantly improved pre- to post-treatment and decreased to a clinically significant degree after 10 treatment sessions. Six participants met criteria for treatment response.

LIMITATIONS

Main limitations include a small sample size and open-label design.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide preliminary evidence that dTMS may be tolerable and associated with clinical improvement in adolescent TRD.

Trajectories of suicidal ideation during rTMS for treatment-resistant depression

BACKGROUND

rTMS is a safe and effective intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, there is limited data on its specific impact on suicidal ideation (SI), and the trajectory of SI over the treatment course.

OBJECTIVE

This open-label clinical trial investigated SI outcomes and trajectories in patients with TRD receiving low-frequency rTMS (LFR) to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC; N = 55).

METHODS

A latent class mixed-effect model was used to identify response trajectories for SI as well as core mood symptoms. Logistic regression analyses investigated risk factors associated with identified trajectories.

RESULTS

For each symptom domain, we identified two distinct trajectories during LFR, one tracking improvement (SI: n = 35, 60 %; mood: n = 29, 53 %) and the other tracking no improvement (SI: n = 20, 40 %; mood: n = 26, 47 %). Male sex, higher baseline anxiety, and higher baseline SI were risk factors for no improvement of SI; while higher baseline anxiety and benzodiazepine use were risk factors for no improvement of mood. Mediation analyses showed that anxiety was a risk factor for no improvement of SI and mood independent of benzodiazepine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to investigate trajectories of response to LFR to the right DLPFC. SI and mood improved with LFR in most patients but the severity of anxiety symptoms was a factor of poor prognosis for both. Nuanced characterization of SI response to rTMS may lead to critical insights for individualized targeting strategies.

Neuronavigated Right Orbitofrontal 20 Hz Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Augmentation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder with Comorbid Depression and Anxiety Disorders: An Open-Label Study

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for treating obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), alternative approaches need to be explored due to the high likelihood of treatment resistance. Neuronavigated 20 Hz theta burst stimulation (TBS-20 Hz), targeting the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) augmented with the right orbitofrontal cortex (ROFC), was tested for treating OCD comorbid with depression and anxiety disorders.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on fourteen patients treated for moderate-to-severe OCD in a private outpatient clinic. Twelve patients had comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD), and thirteen patients had either generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) or panic disorder (PD). Patients completed the Y-BOCS-SR, BDI-II, and BAI rating scales weekly, which were used to measure the changes in OCD, depression, and anxiety symptoms, respectively.

RESULTS

Neuronavigated TBS-20 Hz was sequentially applied to the right DLPFC (RDLPFC), left DLPFC (LDLPFC), and ROFC. A total of 64% (9/14) of patients achieved remission from OCD (Y-BOCS-SR ≤ 14) in an average of 6.1 weeks of treatment (SD = 4.0). A total of 58% (7/12) of patients remitted from MDD (BDI < 13) in an average of 4.1 weeks (SD = 2.8), and 62% (8/13) of patients remitted from GAD/PD (BAI < 8) in an average of 4.3 weeks (SD = 2.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The neuronavigated TBS-20 Hz sequential stimulation of RDLPFC and LDLPFC, followed by ROFC, significantly reduced OCD, MDD, and GAD/PD symptoms. Randomized sham controls are warranted to validate these results.

The Clinical Efficacy of Accelerated Deep Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Depression and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Multi-centric Real-World Observational Data

Background Of late, the interest in accelerated treatment protocols in repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for the treatment of depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been gaining momentum. Studies have already found that the patterned theta burst stimulation is non-inferior to the standard high-frequency stimulation in treating depression. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a customized accelerated combination TMS naturalistic setting. Methods Retrospective analysis of pre and post-deep repetitive TMS responses in depression and OCD patients was performed. About 391 Depression and 239 OCD patients' data was analyzed. Customized treatment protocols consisted of twice daily high-frequency stimulations intervened by one theta burst stimulation. The outcome measures were a day six score in depression and a day 10 score in OCD, compared to day one baseline scores. Results The overall response rate in depression was 60.86%, estimated as a >50% reduction in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) 21 items score, and 62.76% in OCD, estimated as a >35% reduction in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score. The mean reduction of YBOCS and HAM-D was statistically significant at p<0.0001 (Mann-Whitney U test statistic=9442.5, z=12.66 for YBOCS and 16673.5, z=18.92 for HAM-D). Corresponding effect size estimations revealed Cohen's d value of 1.40 and 1.59, respectively. Conclusions The response rates achieved at day six and day 10 in depression and OCD, respectively, were comparable to previous studies employing standard treatment protocols. The accelerated protocol produced satisfactory short-term clinical outcomes that were effective in the early management of the illness without any serious adverse effects.

Older age associated with better antidepressant response to H1-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation in female patients

BACKGROUND

TMS is increasingly used to treat depression, but predictors of treatment outcomes remain unclear. We assessed the association between age and TMS response given inconsistent prior reports limited by small sample size, heterogeneity, outdated TMS parameters, lack of assessment of H1-coil TMS, and lack of an a priori hypothesis. We hypothesized that older age would be associated with better treatment response based on trends in recent large exploratory analyses.

METHODS

We conducted a naturalistic retrospective analysis of patients (n = 378) ages 18-80 with depression (baseline Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) > 5) who received 29-35 sessions of TMS between 2014 and 2021. Response was assessed using percent reduction of QIDS-SR. The relationship between percent response or remission and age group was assessed using the chi-square test.

RESULTS

85 % of patients received the standard protocol of H1-coil TMS to the left DLPFC. Percent response and remission rates for the entire study sample increased with age (response: p = .026; remission: p = .0023). This finding was stronger in female patients (response: p = .0033; remission: p = .00098) and was not observed in male patients (response: p = .73; remission: p = .26). This was confirmed in a sub-analysis of patients who only received the standard protocol with the H1-coil for the entire treatment course.

LIMITATIONS

Naturalistic retrospective analysis from one academic center.

CONCLUSIONS

Older age is associated with a better antidepressant response to H1-coil TMS in female patients. This was demonstrated in a hypothesis-driven confirmation of prior exploratory findings in a large sample size with a homogeneous data collection protocol across all participants.

Accelerated sequential bilateral theta-burst stimulation in major depression: an open trial

Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is approved and widely used in the treatment of treatment resistant-major depression. More recently, accelerated protocols delivering multiple treatments per day have been shown to be efficacious and potentially enhance outcomes compared to once daily protocols. Meanwhile, bilateral treatment protocols have also been increasingly tested to enhance outcomes. Here, we examined the efficacy and safety of accelerated bilateral TBS in major depressive disorder (MDD). In this open label pilot study, 25 patients with MDD (60%: women; mean age (SD): 45.24 (12.22)) resistant to at least one antidepressant, received bilateral TBS, consisting of 5 sequential bilateral intermittent TBS (iTBS) (600 pulses) and continuous TBS (cTBS) (600 pulses) treatments delivered to the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), respectively, daily for 5 days at 120% resting motor threshold. Outcome measures were post-treat treatment changes at day 5 and 2-weeks in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) scores and response (≥ 50% reduction from the baseline scores) and remission (≤ 7) rates. There was a significant reduction in HDRS scores at day 5 (p < 0.001) and 2-weeks post treatment (p < 0.001). The response rates increased from 20% at day 5 to 32% at 2-weeks post treatment suggesting delayed clinical effects. However, reduction in symptom scores between two post treatment endpoints was non-significant. 60% of patients could not tolerate the high intensity stimulation. No major adverse events occurred. Open label uncontrolled study with small sample size. These preliminary findings suggest that accelerated bilateral TBS may be clinically effective and safe for treatment resistant depression. Randomized sham-controlled trials are needed to establish the therapeutic role of accelerated bilateral TBS in depression.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT10001858.

Cortical stimulation depth of nTMS investigated in a cohort of convexity meningiomas above the primary motor cortex

BACKGROUND

In clinical routine, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is usually applied down to 25 mm. Yet, besides clinical experience and mathematical models, the penetration depth remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the maximum cortical stimulation depth of nTMS in patients with meningioma above the primary motor cortex, causing a displacement of the primary motor cortex away from the skull.

NEW METHOD

nTMS stimulation data was reviewed regarding the maximum depth of stimulations eliciting motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). Additionally, electric field values and stimulation intensity were analyzed.

RESULTS

Out of a consecutive cohort of 17 meningioma cases, 3 cases of meningioma located in motor-eloquent regions of the upper extremity and 3 cases of the lower extremity were analyzed after fulfilling all inclusion criteria. Regarding the upper extremity motor representations, the MEP could be elicited at a stimulation depth of up to 44 mm, with an electric field of 69 V/m. These results were found in 1 case with the maximum potential distance to the cortex being higher than the maximum stimulation depth eliciting MEPs. For the lower extremities, a maximum depth of 40 mm was recorded (electric field 64 V/m).

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS

None available CONCLUSIONS: The effect of nTMS is not limited to superficial cortical stimulation alone. Depending on electric-field intensity and focality, nTMS stimulation can be applied at a depth of 44 mm. In all cases, electric field strength was comparable and no superficial cortex with comparable electric field strength was observed to elicit MEPs.

Chronometric TMS-fMRI of personalized left dorsolateral prefrontal target reveals state-dependency of subgenual anterior cingulate cortex effects

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied to a left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) area with a specific connectivity profile to the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) has emerged as a highly effective non-invasive treatment option for depression. However, antidepressant outcomes demonstrate significant variability among therapy plans and individuals. One overlooked contributing factor is the individual brain state at the time of treatment. In this study we used interleaved TMS-fMRI to investigate the influence of brain state on acute TMS effects, both locally and remotely. TMS was performed during rest and during different phases of cognitive task processing. Twenty healthy participants were included in this study. In the first session, imaging data for TMS targeting were acquired, allowing for identification of individualized targets in the left DLPFC based on highest anti-correlation with the sgACC. The second session involved chronometric interleaved TMS-fMRI measurements, with 10 Hz triplets of TMS administered during rest and at distinct timings during an N-back task. Consistent with prior findings, interleaved TMS-fMRI revealed significant BOLD activation changes in the targeted network. The precise timing of TMS relative to the cognitive states during the task demonstrated distinct BOLD response in clinically relevant brain regions, including the sgACC. Employing a standardized timing approach for TMS using a task revealed more consistent modulation of the sgACC at the group level compared to stimulation during rest. In conclusion, our findings strongly suggest that acute local and remote effects of TMS are influenced by brain state during stimulation. This study establishes a basis for considering brain state as a significant factor in designing treatment protocols, possibly improving TMS treatment outcomes.

Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation combined with antidepressant medications for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Antidepressants, noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), and their combination are commonly used in routine clinical practice. Nevertheless, there is a continuous dispute regarding whether the effectiveness of NIBS in combination with antidepressants exceeds that of antidepressants alone. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the existing evidence and draw a definitive conclusion on this issue.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of five databases: Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, SinoMed, and the Cochrane Database of Randomized Controlled Trials. The search was conducted until October 6, 2023. The primary outcomes were the pre- and post-intervention depression and anxiety scores. Secondary outcomes included dropout rates, response rates, and certain levels of neurotransmitters [ 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), dopamine (DA), and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)] at the end of the intervention. Subgroup, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. The data were analysed using R 4.2.2.

RESULTS

We included 18 RCTs [1357 participants; 11 studies used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and 7 studies used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)]. The follow-up duration varied from two weeks to three months. Overall, whether in combination with rTMS or tDCS, antidepressants proved more effective in alleviating depressive symptoms compared to when used as monotherapy. However, this advantage was not evident during the follow-up period. (p > 0.05). And the combination's efficacy in improving anxiety was found to be lacking. Post-treatment serum levels of 5-HT, DA, and GABA were higher in the rTMS group were higher than antidepressant medication group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, subgroup analysis results indicated that only the rTMS + antidepressant medication treatment significantly improved remission and remission rates. The meta-regression results showed that the type of antidepressant and the sex of the participants had a significant association with the depression score.

CONCLUSION

Combination treatment with NIBS was significantly more effective in improving depression symptoms than medication alone. rTMS combined with antidepressants appears to be more effective in improving response and remission rates. However, efficacy may be influenced by the type of medicine used in combination, and long-term efficacy data is lacking.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023388259.

A potential neuromodulation target for PTSD in Veterans derived from focal brain lesions

Neuromodulation trials for PTSD have yielded mixed results, and the optimal neuroanatomical target remains unclear. We analyzed three datasets to study brain circuitry causally linked to PTSD in military Veterans. After penetrating traumatic brain injury (n=193), lesions that reduced probability of PTSD were preferentially connected to a circuit including the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), amygdala, and anterolateral temporal lobe (cross-validation p=0.01). In Veterans without lesions (n=180), PTSD was specifically associated with connectivity within this circuit (p<0.01). Connectivity change within this circuit correlated with PTSD improvement after transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) (n=20) (p<0.01), even though the circuit was not directly targeted. Finally, we directly targeted this circuit with fMRI-guided accelerated TMS, leading to rapid resolution of symptoms in a patient with severe lifelong PTSD. All results were independent of depression severity. This lesion-based PTSD circuit may serve as a neuromodulation target for Veterans with PTSD.

Knowledge and attitude toward transcranial magnetic stimulation among rehabilitation specialists in Saudi Arabia

Research has demonstrated the benefits of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in rehabilitation. TMS has been widely used in clinical and research settings for individuals with and without neurological dysfunctions. Therefore, understanding the knowledge and attitudes of rehabilitation specialists regarding TMS is crucial for its application. To our knowledge, no such studies have previously been conducted in the rehabilitation field. Therefore, this study is the first to assess rehabilitation specialists' knowledge of and attitudes toward TMS. An observational cross-sectional study using a self-administered online survey was conducted among 102 rehabilitation specialists to assess their knowledge and attitudes regarding TMS application in rehabilitation sciences. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to describe the knowledge and attitudes of rehabilitation specialists toward TMS and examine the impact of different factors such as gender, education level, acceptability, and practice on these outcomes. Rehabilitation specialists who participated in this study showed a limited level of general knowledge of TMS in rehabilitation (7.81 ± 6.20, 37.19%). However, a significant association between educational levels and knowledge was found. Higher knowledge scores were observed for specialists with post-graduate degrees compared to those with only a bachelor's degree. Moreover, knowledge level, experience, and availability of TMS equipment in the workplace led to a positive attitude toward TMS among rehabilitation specialists. A low knowledge level among rehabilitation specialists was attributed to their level of education. Nevertheless, specialists showed an overall positive attitude toward TMS. Therefore, customized medical education is necessary to incorporate TMS theory and applications into neuroscience and rehabilitation courses for rehabilitation specialists as it holds significant promise as a therapeutic tool.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Across the Lifespan: Impact of Developmental and Degenerative Processes

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has emerged as a pivotal noninvasive technique for investigating cortical excitability and plasticity across the lifespan, offering valuable insights into neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative processes. In this review, we explore the impact of TMS applications on our understanding of normal development, healthy aging, neurodevelopmental disorders, and adult-onset neurodegenerative diseases. By presenting key developmental milestones and age-related changes in TMS measures, we provide a foundation for understanding the maturation of neurotransmitter systems and the trajectory of cognitive functions throughout the lifespan. Building on this foundation, the paper delves into the pathophysiology of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Tourette syndrome, and adolescent depression. Highlighting recent findings on altered neurotransmitter circuits and dysfunctional cortical plasticity, we underscore the potential of TMS as a valuable tool for unraveling underlying mechanisms and informing future therapeutic interventions. We also review the emerging role of TMS in investigating and treating the most common adult-onset neurodegenerative disorders and late-onset depression. By outlining the therapeutic applications of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques in these disorders, we discuss the growing body of evidence supporting their use as therapeutic tools for symptom management and potentially slowing disease progression. The insights gained from TMS studies have advanced our understanding of the underlying mechanisms in both healthy and disease states, ultimately informing the development of more targeted diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for a wide range of neuropsychiatric conditions.

Accelerated Theta Burst Stimulation: Safety, Efficacy, and Future Advancements

Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that can be used to modulate neural networks underlying psychiatric and neurological disorders. TBS can be delivered intermittently or continuously. The conventional intermittent TBS protocol is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to treat otherwise treatment-resistant depression, but the 6-week duration limits the applicability of this therapy. Accelerated TBS protocols present an opportunity to deliver higher pulse doses in shorter periods of time, thus resulting in faster and potentially more clinically effective treatment. However, the acceleration of TBS delivery raises questions regarding the relative safety, efficacy, and durability compared with conventional TBS protocols. In this review paper, we present the data from accelerated TBS trials to date that support the safety and effectiveness of accelerated protocols while acknowledging the need for more durability data. We discuss the stimulation parameters that seem to be important for the efficacy of accelerated TBS protocols and possible avenues for further optimization.

rTMS for post-covid-19 condition: A sham-controlled case series involving iTBS-300 and iTBS-600

Post-Covid-19 Condition (PCC) is a syndrome comprised of symptoms persisting 3 months or more beyond SARS-CoV-2 primary infection. It is typically characterized by fatigue, cognitive problems and psychiatric symptoms, as well as cardiac symptoms that contribute to exercise intolerance in many. Despite the high prevalence of PCC among those with a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, there is currently no widely accepted rehabilitation strategy, and many conventional modalities are movement-based. Non-invasive brain stimulation methods such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may have some potential to alleviate the cognitive and affective symptoms of PCC without reliance on exercise. The purpose of the present study was to explore the feasibility and tolerability of using rTMS to treat symptoms of "brain fog" and affective disturbance among those living with PCC, using a case series design. We enrolled four individuals with PCC following a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, at least 3 months after the resolution of the primary infection. Participants were randomized to 4 sessions of active and 2 sessions of sham intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS); two intensities of iTBS were evaluated: iTBS-300 and iTBS-600. No adverse events occurred in active or sham stimulation; 2 participants reported tingling sensation on the scalp but no other tolerability issues. Trends in symptoms suggested improvements in cognitive interference, quality of life, and anxiety in the majority of participants. In summary, in this case series iTBS was well tolerated among 4 individuals with PCC; active stimulation was associated with positive trends in some primary symptom clusters as compared with sham stimulation. Future studies should examine the effects of iTBS on PCC symptoms in the context of experimental studies and randomized controlled trials.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of neuromodulation therapies for substance use disorders

While pharmacological, behavioral and psychosocial treatments are available for substance use disorders (SUDs), they are not always effective or well-tolerated. Neuromodulation (NM) methods, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) may address SUDs by targeting addiction neurocircuitry. We evaluated the efficacy of NM to improve behavioral outcomes in SUDs. A systematic literature search was performed on MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and PubMed databases and a list of search terms for four key concepts (SUD, rTMS, tDCS, DBS) was applied. Ninety-four studies were identified that examined the effects of rTMS, tDCS, and DBS on substance use outcomes (e.g., craving, consumption, and relapse) amongst individuals with SUDs including alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, stimulants, and opioids. Meta-analyses were performed for alcohol and tobacco studies using rTMS and tDCS. We found that rTMS reduced substance use and craving, as indicated by medium to large effect sizes (Hedge's g > 0.5). Results were most encouraging when multiple stimulation sessions were applied, and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was targeted. tDCS also produced medium effect sizes for drug use and craving, though they were highly variable and less robust than rTMS; right anodal DLPFC stimulation appeared to be most efficacious. DBS studies were typically small, uncontrolled studies, but showed promise in reducing misuse of multiple substances. NM may be promising for the treatment of SUDs. Future studies should determine underlying neural mechanisms of NM, and further evaluate extended treatment durations, accelerated administration protocols and long-term outcomes with biochemical verification of substance use.

Major depressive disorder: hypothesis, mechanism, prevention and treatment

Worldwide, the incidence of major depressive disorder (MDD) is increasing annually, resulting in greater economic and social burdens. Moreover, the pathological mechanisms of MDD and the mechanisms underlying the effects of pharmacological treatments for MDD are complex and unclear, and additional diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for MDD still are needed. The currently widely accepted theories of MDD pathogenesis include the neurotransmitter and receptor hypothesis, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis hypothesis, cytokine hypothesis, neuroplasticity hypothesis and systemic influence hypothesis, but these hypothesis cannot completely explain the pathological mechanism of MDD. Even it is still hard to adopt only one hypothesis to completely reveal the pathogenesis of MDD, thus in recent years, great progress has been made in elucidating the roles of multiple organ interactions in the pathogenesis MDD and identifying novel therapeutic approaches and multitarget modulatory strategies, further revealing the disease features of MDD. Furthermore, some newly discovered potential pharmacological targets and newly studied antidepressants have attracted widespread attention, some reagents have even been approved for clinical treatment and some novel therapeutic methods such as phototherapy and acupuncture have been discovered to have effective improvement for the depressive symptoms. In this work, we comprehensively summarize the latest research on the pathogenesis and diagnosis of MDD, preventive approaches and therapeutic medicines, as well as the related clinical trials.

The differential effects of psychiatrists' and patients' prior experiences on views about psychiatric electroceutical interventions

The aim of this study is to examine ways in which prior experiences and familiarity with psychiatric electroceutical interventions (PEI) shape psychiatrists' and patients' views about these interventions. We administered a national survey, with an embedded experiment, to psychiatrists (n = 505) and adults diagnosed with depression (n = 1050). We randomly assigned respondents to one of 8 conditions using a full factorial experimental design: 4 PEI modalities [ECT, rTMS, DBS, or adaptive brain implants (ABIs)] by 2 depression severity levels [moderate or severe]. We analyzed the survey data with ANOVA and OLS linear regression models. Patients having experience with any PEI reported more positive affect toward, but also greater perceived risk from, their assigned PEI than did patients with no such experience. Psychiatrists who referred or administered any PEI reported more positive affect toward and greater perceived influence on self and perceived benefit from their assigned PEI than did psychiatrists with no such familiarity. Limitations of our study include that our participants were randomly assigned to a PEI, not necessarily to the one they had experience with. Moreover, our study did not directly ask about the kind of experiences participants had with a given PEI. Overall, our survey data shows that greater experience with PEIs elicits more positive affect in both stakeholder groups. Beyond this, prior PEI experience shapes attitudes towards these interventions in complex ways. Further research linking different types of experience with a given PEI would help better understand factors shaping attitudes about specific PEIs.

Evaluating real-world effectiveness of accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in a tertiary referral center based in Quebec, Canada

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in a tertiary referral center in Quebec, Canada, focusing on a real-world clinical setting.

METHODS

We reviewed the data of 247 TRD patients treated between January 2012 and May 2022 who received accelerated TMS. Participants were adults diagnosed with unipolar or bipolar depression, resistant to at least two antidepressant trials, and assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).

RESULTS

Significant symptom reduction was found in the completer sample (N = 147), with 46.3 % of patients meeting post-treatment response criteria and 36.1 % achieving remission. Baseline severity of depression, age, and the number of antidepressant trials were key predictors of treatment outcomes. Patients who did not complete treatment had generally more severe depressive and anxious symptoms and greater treatment resistance. No significant differences in response rates were observed across different TMS coils.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated the effectiveness and tolerability of accelerated TMS for TRD in a real-world clinical setting.

Non-invasive Neuromodulation of Arrhythmias

Dysfunction of the cardiac autonomic nervous system (CANS) is associated with various cardiac arrhythmias. Subsequently, invasive techniques have successfully targeted the CANS for the treatment of certain arrhythmias, such as sympathetic denervation for ventricular tachycardia storm. Non-invasive strategies capable of modulating the CANS for arrhythmia treatment have begun to gain interest due to their low-risk profile and applicability as an adjuvant therapy. This review provides an evidence-based overview of the currently studied technologies capable of non-invasively modulating CANS for the suppression of atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias.

Theta burst stimulation add on to dialectical behavioral therapy in borderline-personality-disorder: methods and design of a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial

Specialized psychotherapeutic treatments like dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) are recommended as first treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD). In recent years, studies have emerged that focus on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in BPD. Both have independently demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of BPD. Intermitted theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a modified design of rTMS, is thought to increase the excitability of neurons and could be a supplement to psychotherapy in addition to being a standalone treatment. However, no studies to date have investigated the combination of DBT and rTMS/iTBS. This study protocol describes the methods and design of a randomized, single-blinded, sham-controlled clinical pilot study in which BPD patients will be randomly assigned to either iTBS or sham during four consecutive weeks (20 sessions in total) in addition to standardized DBT treatment. The stimulation will focus on the unilateral stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), which plays an important role in the control of impulsivity and risk-taking. Primary outcome is the difference in borderline symptomatology, while secondary target criteria are depressive symptoms, general functional level, impulsivity and self-compassion. Statistical analysis of therapy response will be conducted by Mixed Model Repeated Measurement using a 2 × 2-factorial between-subjects design with the between-subject factor stimulation (TMS vs. Sham) and the within-subject factor time (T0 vs. T1). Furthermore, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be conducted and analyzed. The study will provide evidence and insight on whether iTBS has an enhancing effect as add-on to DBT in BPD.Trial registration: drks.de (DRKS00020413) registered 13/01/2020.

Cortical glutamate, Glx, and total N-acetylaspartate: potential biomarkers of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment response and outcomes in major depression

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective treatment for individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have not improved with standard therapies. However, only 30-45% of patients respond to rTMS. Predicting response to rTMS will benefit both patients and providers in terms of prescribing and targeting treatment for maximum efficacy and directing resources, as individuals with lower likelihood of response could be redirected to more suitable treatment alternatives. In this exploratory study, our goal was to use proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy to examine how glutamate (Glu), Glx, and total N-acetylaspartate (tNAA) predict post-rTMS changes in overall MDD severity and symptoms, and treatment response. Metabolites were measured in a right dorsal anterior cingulate cortex voxel prior to a standard course of 10 Hz rTMS to the left DLPFC in 25 individuals with MDD. MDD severity and symptoms were evaluated via the Inventory of Depression Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR). rTMS response was defined as ≥50% change in full-scale IDS-SR scores post treatment. Percent change in IDS-SR symptom domains were evaluated using principal component analysis and established subscales. Generalized linear and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between baseline Glu, Glx, and tNAA and outcomes while controlling for age and sex. Participants with baseline Glu and Glx levels in the lower range had greater percent change in full scale IDS-SR scores post-treatment (p < 0.001), as did tNAA (p = 0.007). Low glutamatergic metabolite levels also predicted greater percent change in mood/cognition symptoms (p ≤ 0.001). Low-range Glu, Glx, and tNAA were associated with greater improvement on the immuno-metabolic subscale (p ≤ 0.003). Baseline Glu predicted rTMS responder status (p = 0.025) and had an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve of 0.81 (p = 0.009), demonstrating excellent discriminative ability. Baseline Glu, Glx, and tNAA significantly predicted MDD improvement after rTMS; preliminary evidence also demonstrates metabolite association with symptom subdomain improvement post-rTMS. This work provides feasibility for a personalized medicine approach to rTMS treatment selection, with individuals with Glu levels in the lower range potentially being the best candidates.

Effects and central mechanism of electroacupuncture and MRI-navigated rTMS for PSD: study protocol for an fMRI-based single-center, randomized, controlled, open-label trial

Background

Post-stroke depression (PSD) is the most common mental complication after stroke and has a serious impact on functional outcomes and quality of life for stroke patients. Antidepressants are the first-line treatment for PSD; however, many reported side effects remain. Clinical research and practice guidelines have shown that electro-acupuncture (EA) or rTMS have a positive effect on PSD. However, there are few clinical studies on EA and MRI-navigated rTMS for PSD that explore the fMRI-based central mechanism in depression.

Methods

In this randomized, controlled, open-label trial, 64 patients with PSD will be randomly allocated into the experiment group (n = 32) or control group (n = 32). The experiment group will receive EA and MRI-navigated rTMS and the control group will receive MRI-navigated rTMS treatment, in 12-20 sessions over 4 weeks. In addition, 10 healthy people for fMRI scanning will be recruited as a healthy control group without any intervention. The primary outcome will be the change from baseline in the Hamilton Depression Scale-24 item (HAMD-24) scores at week 4. The primary analysis of the central mechanism will mainly involve cortical morphology, local spontaneous brain activity, and the default mode network (DMN) functional connectivity based on fMRI at 0 and 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes will include the neuro-patho-physiological and quality of life changes in cortical excitability, determined using the motor evoked potential test (MEP), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Scale, Modified Barthel Index (MBI) Scale, and Health Scale of Traditional Chinese Medicine (HSTCM). Additional indicators will include the Acceptability Questionnaire and Health Economics Evaluation (cost-effectiveness analysis) to assess the acceptability and economic practicality of the treatment under study. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and post intervention.

Discussion

EA and MRI-navigated rTMS therapy could become an alternative treatment for PSD, and it is expected that this trial will provide reliable clinical evidence and a potential central mechanism for the future use of EA and MRI-navigated rTMS for PSD.

Clinical trial registration

NCT05516680, ClinicalTrials.gov (registered in August 2022).

The role of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy in functional bowel disease

Objective

This study investigates the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a biophysical therapy for alleviating symptoms of functional bowel disorder (FBD) and associated psychological symptoms by targeting the brain-gut axis.

Methods

We conducted a comparative analysis involving 226 subjects, comprising the FBD group (n = 113) and a healthy control group (n = 113). Within the FBD group, participants were further divided into those who received rTMS therapy (FBD treatment group, n = 63) and those who did not (FBD control group, n = 50). The FBD treatment group was subcategorized based on the number of rTMS treatments received. We evaluated various factors, including gender, age, monthly household income, daily activity level, and sleep quality, as potential risk factors for FBD. Severity assessments of FBD and associated symptoms (constipation, anxiety, depression, and somatization disorders) were conducted using validated scales before and after treatment.

Results

Our findings revealed a higher incidence of FBD in women, with most cases emerging at age 50 or older. We identified lower monthly household income, reduced daily activity levels, and poorer sleep quality as factors associated with a higher likelihood of FBD. FBD patients exhibited higher scores for constipation, anxiety, depression, and somatization disorders compared to healthy controls. rTMS therapy was effective in reducing gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety, depression, and somatization disorders among FBD patients. Notably, the extent of improvement was positively correlated with the number of rTMS sessions. No adverse effects were observed during the study.

Conclusion

Our study underscores the efficacy of biophysical therapy, specifically repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, in mitigating FBD symptoms and associated psychological distress. The treatment's effectiveness is positively linked to the frequency of rTMS sessions.

Comparisons of Accelerated Continuous and Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression and Suicidal Ideation

BACKGROUND

Suicidal ideation is a substantial clinical challenge in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Recent work demonstrated promising antidepressant effects in TRD patients with no or mild suicidal ideation using a specific protocol termed intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). Here, we examined the clinical effects of accelerated schedules of iTBS and continuous TBS (cTBS) in patients with moderate to severe suicidal ideation.

METHODS

Patients with TRD and moderate to severe suicidal ideation (n = 44) were randomly assigned to receive accelerated iTBS or cTBS treatment. Treatments were delivered in 10 daily TBS sessions (1800 pulses/session) for 5 consecutive days (total of 90,000 pulses). Neuronavigation was employed to target accelerated iTBS and cTBS to the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), respectively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in a 4-week follow-up period.

RESULTS

Accelerated cTBS was superior to iTBS in the management of suicidal ideation (pweek 1 = .027) and anxiety symptoms (pweek 1 = .01). Accelerated iTBS and cTBS were comparable in antidepressant effects (p < .001; accelerated cTBS: mean change at weeks 1, 3, 5 = 49.55%, 54.99%, 53.11%; accelerated iTBS: mean change at weeks 1, 3, 5 = 44.52%, 48.04%, 51.74%). No serious adverse events occurred during the trial. One patient withdrew due to hypomania. The most common adverse event was discomfort at the treatment site (22.73% in both groups).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide the first evidence that accelerated schedules of left DLPFC iTBS and right DLPFC cTBS are comparably effective in managing antidepressant symptoms and indicate that right DLPFC cTBS is potentially superior in reducing suicidal ideation and anxiety symptoms.

Equal remission rates and reduced length of hospital stay with twice-daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for major depression - A large naturalistic retrospective cohort association study

OBJECTIVES

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a level 1a evidence-based treatment for major depression, but high cost of care and limited effectiveness in naturalistic cohorts have been lingering criticisms. This naturalistic, retrospective cohort analysis compares the effect of once and twice daily treatment protocols of rTMS using quality assurance data collected at an Australian private psychiatric hospital.

METHODS

A total of 210 inpatients self-selected into two groups receiving up to 30 sessions of either daily (n = 101) or twice daily (n = 109) 10 Hz rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The a priori primary outcome measure was remission rate as measured by pre and post treatment HAMD-17 scores. Length of hospital stay was a secondary post hoc outcome adopted due to the importance to cost of acute psychiatric care.

RESULTS

Remission rates were similar across groups, with 44.9% and 45.4% for twice daily and daily rTMS groups respectively, although these may be confounded by patient expectations, other treatments and medication changes given the naturalistic setting. The length of hospital stay was 10.11 days and 18.44 days for twice daily and daily rTMS respectively - the twice daily rTMS length of hospital stay was 45.1% shorter 95% CI [38.7% - 51.56%]. Dropout rates were high; Twenty-seven (24.77%) twice daily participants dropped out before 20 sessions were completed, and 35 (34.65%) of daily participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Twice daily 10 Hz left sided rTMS remission outcomes were similar to traditional once daily rTMS but required a shorter length of hospital stay. This finding has substantial cost of care implications. If these findings are independently replicated, twice daily rTMS may become the standard of care for inpatient rTMS.

Non-inferiority of intermittent theta burst stimulation over the left V1 vs. classical target for depression: A randomized, double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the visual cortex (VC) has shown antidepressant effects for major depressive disorder (MDD) in sham-controlled trials, but comparisons with rTMS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) are lacking. We aimed to determine the non-inferiority of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) over VC vs DLPFC for MDD.

METHODS

Participants randomly received navigated iTBS over the left V1 or the left DLPFC twice daily for 14 days with a 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) score from baseline to treatment end, with 2.5 points as the non-inferiority margin. Secondary outcomes included: improvement in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); response and remission rates; suicidal ideation and adverse events.

RESULTS

Of 75 randomized patients, 67 completed full treatment, including 52 first-episode patients and 15 relapsers. The primary outcome indicated the non-inferiority of VC (adjusted difference 1.14, lower 97.5 % CI -1.24; p = .002), confirmed by improvements in objective cognitive task and protein levels, as did most secondary outcomes. Reduced suicidal ideation after treatment, incidence of eye discomfort and pain score were lower in the VC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Left VC iTBS has the potential to be non-inferior to DLPFC iTBS in most first-episode MDD in improving depressive symptoms and cognitive function, with less suicidal ideation and adverse events.

LIMITATIONS

Given the limited sample size, the lack of a sham control and the use of antidepressants, the findings should be interpreted with caution.

Pre-clinical indications of brain stimulation treatments for non-affective psychiatric disorders, a status update

Over the past two decades noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have emerged as powerful therapeutic options for a range of psychiatric and neurological disorders. NIBS are hypothesized to rebalance pathological brain networks thus reducing symptoms and improving functioning. This development has been fueled by controlled studies with increasing size and rigor aiming to characterize how treatments induce clinically effective change. Clinical trials of NIBS for specific indications have resulted in federal approval for unipolar depression, bipolar depression, smoking cessation, and obsessive-compulsive disorder in the United States, and several other indications worldwide. As a rapidly emerging field, there are numerous pre-clinical indications currently in development using a variety of electrical and magnetic, non-convulsive, and convulsive approaches. This review discusses the state-of-the-science surrounding promising avenues of NIBS currently in pre-approval stages for non-affective psychiatric disorders. We consider emerging therapies for psychosis, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and borderline personality disorder, utilizing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and magnetic seizure therapy (MST), with an additional brief section for early-stage techniques including transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (tFUS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). As revealed in this review, there is considerable promise across all four psychiatric indications with different NIBS approaches. Positive findings are notable for the treatment of psychosis using tDCS, MST, and rTMS. While rTMS is already FDA approved for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder, methodologies such as tDCS also demonstrate potential in this condition. Emerging techniques show promise for treating non-affective disorders likely leading to future regulatory approvals.

Pre-treatment frontal beta events are associated with executive dysfunction improvement after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression: A preliminary report

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an established clinical treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) that has also been found to improve aspects of executive functioning. The objective of this study was to examine whether oscillatory burst-like events within the beta band (15-29 Hz) prior to treatment could predict subsequent change in self-reported executive dysfunction (EDF) across a clinical course of rTMS for MDD. Twenty-eight adults (64% female) with MDD completed the self-report Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe) and provided eyes-closed resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) before and after a clinical course of rTMS therapy for primary MDD. The rate, power, duration, and frequency span of transient EEG measured oscillatory beta events were calculated. Events within delta/theta and alpha bands were examined to assess for beta specificity. After controlling for improvement in primary depressive symptoms, a lower rate of beta events at F3, Fz, F4, and Cz prior to rTMS treatment was associated with a larger improvement in EDF after rTMS treatment. In addition, a decrease in beta event rate at Fz pre-to-post treatment was associated with a larger improvement in EDF after treatment. Results were largely specific to the beta band. In this study, the rate of frontrocentral beta events prior to treatment significantly predicted the likelihood of subsequent improvement in EDF symptoms following a clinical course of rTMS for MDD. These preliminary findings suggest the potential utility of EEG measured beta events and rTMS for targeting EDF across an array of neuropsychiatric disorders.

Managing substance use in patients receiving therapeutic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: A scoping review

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is an invaluable treatment option for neuropsychiatric disorders. Co-occurring recreational and nonmedical substance use can be common in those presenting for rTMS treatment, and it is unknown how it may affect the safety and efficacy of rTMS for the treatment of currently approved neuropsychiatric indications. This scoping review aimed to map the literature on humans receiving rTMS and had a history of any type of substance use. The search identified 274 articles providing information on inclusion/exclusion criteria, withdrawal criteria, safety protocols, type of rTMS and treatment parameters, adverse events and effect on primary outcomes that related to substance use. There are neurophysiological effects of substance use on cortical excitability, although the relevance to clinical rTMS practice is unknown. The current literature supports the safety and feasibility of delivering rTMS to those who have co-occurring neuropsychiatric disorder and substance use. However, specific details on how varying degrees of substance use alters the safety, efficacy, and mechanisms of rTMS remains poorly described.

Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Systematic Review and Meta‑analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Therapeutic alternatives for spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) are limited. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a potential intervention has drawn heightened interest because of its ease of implementation, cost-effectiveness, and safety profile. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of rTMS in the treatment of SCA3. We systematically searched databases-PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Springer-for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of rTMS in the treatment of SCA3. Major efficacy outcomes were assessed, including International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) scores, Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) scores, and ICARS subscale scores. Six randomized controlled trials involving 175 patients were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis results indicated statistically significant increases in ICARS (mean difference (MD) =  - 3.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) =  - 7.46 to - 0.30; p = 0.03) and SARA (MD of - 1.59, 95% CI - 2.99 to - 0.19; p = 0.03) scores. No significant heterogeneity was observed across all outcomes (I2 = 0%). Dynamic function within the ICARS scale markedly improved with rTMS (MD =  - 2.19, 95% CI =  - 3.82 to - 0.55; p = 0.009). The majority of the included studies exhibited a low risk of bias, and no severe adverse reactions were noted. Our meta-analysis, consisting of six randomized controlled trials with 175 participants, suggests that rTMS exhibits efficacy in alleviating both ataxic symptoms and certain aspects of motor function in SCA3.

A Meta-analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

BACKGROUND

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating illness with substantial morbidity. Although pharmacological and behavioral evidence-based treatments have shown efficacy, many patients remain unresponsive to this first-line care. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown significant promise for patients with treatment-refractory affective disorders. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to examine the therapeutic benefit of rTMS in patients with OCD and explore moderators of its treatment effects.

METHODS

PubMed (1997-Dec 31, 2022) and PsycINFO were searched for randomized sham-controlled trials of rTMS to treat OCD using the following terms: "obsessive-compulsive disorder," "transcranial magnetic stimulation," and "randomized controlled trial." Clinical characteristics and effect sizes were extracted from 25 randomized controlled trials (860 participants). A random effects model calculated the effect sizes for treatment efficacy and treatment response using the clinician-rated Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale.

RESULTS

Across randomized controlled trials, rTMS exhibited a moderate therapeutic effect (g = 0.65) on OCD symptom severity and a 3-fold increased likelihood of treatment response (relative risk = 3.15) compared with sham conditions. Greater improvement in comorbid depression severity corresponded with greater treatment effects of rTMS on OCD symptom severity. In addition, longer rTMS sessions and fewer overall sessions predicted greater clinical improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

rTMS is moderately effective for reducing OCD symptom severity. It holds potential to serve as a therapeutic intervention, particularly for patients with OCD who have failed standard treatments and those with comorbid depression. Further research is needed to optimize rTMS protocols and evaluate the long-term efficacy of rTMS for OCD.

Effects of intermittent theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation on post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms: A randomized controlled trial

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent and debilitating illness, which can be alleviated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a newer form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), offers the advantage of shorter treatment sessions compared to the standard 10 Hz rTMS treatment. In order to compare the two forms of TMS, we enrolled 75 participants aged between 18 and 55 years who presented with (PCL-C) scale score of at least 50. Participants were randomly assigned to groups in a ratio of 1:1:1, receiving either 10 Hz rTMS, iTBS, or sham-controlled iTBS. Participants in the two treatment groups underwent 15 therapies which consisted of 1800 pulses and targeted the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The main outcomes included changes in scores on the PCL-C and the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). After intervention, the PCL-C and PTGI scores in iTBS and rTMS groups were significantly different from those in sham-controlled iTBS group. No significant differences in PCL-C and PTGI were found between the two active treatment groups. ITBS, with a shorter treatment duration, can effectively improve the symptoms of PTSD, with no significant difference in effect from that of rTMS. Future studies need to further elucidate the mechanisms, optimize the parameters and investigate the therapeutic potential and efficacy of iTBS in PTSD.

Personalized, parcel-guided rTMS for the treatment of major depressive disorder: Safety and proof of concept

BACKGROUND

Not all patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) benefit from the US Food and Drug Administration-approved use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. We may be undertreating depression with this one-size-fits-all rTMS strategy.

METHODS

We present a retrospective review of targeted and connectome-guided rTMS in 26 patients from Cingulum Health from 2020 to 2023 with MDD or MDD with associated symptoms. rTMS was conducted by identifying multiple cortical targets based on anomalies in individual functional connectivity networks as determined by machine learning connectomic software. Quality of life assessed by the EuroQol (EQ-5D) score and depression symptoms assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were administered prior to treatment, directly after, and at a follow-up consultation.

RESULTS

Of the 26 patients treated with rTMS, 16 (62%) attained remission after treatment. Of the 19 patients who completed follow-up assessments after an average interval of 2.6 months, 11 (58%) responded to treatment and 13 (68%) showed significant remission. Between patients classified with or without treatment-resistant depression, there was no difference in BDI improvement. Additionally, there was significant improvement in quality of life after treatment and during follow-up compared to baseline.

LIMITATIONS

This review is retrospective in nature, so there is no control group to assess the placebo effect on patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The personalized, connectome-guided approach of rTMS is safe and may be effective for depression. This personalized rTMS treatment allows for co-treatment of multiple disorders, such as the comorbidity of depression and anxiety.

rTMS ameliorates depressive-like behaviors and regulates the gut microbiome and medium- and long-chain fatty acids in mice exposed to chronic unpredictable mild stress

INTRODUCTION

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a clinically useful therapy for depression. However, the effects of rTMS on the metabolism of fatty acids (FAs) and the composition of gut microbiota in depression are not well established.

METHODS

Mice received rTMS (15 Hz, 1.26 T) for seven consecutive days after exposure to chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS). The subsequent depressive-like behaviors, the composition of gut microbiota of stool samples, as well as medium- and long-chain fatty acids (MLCFAs) in the plasma, prefrontal cortex (PFC), and hippocampus (HPC) were evaluated.

RESULTS

CUMS induced remarkable changes in gut microbiotas and fatty acids, specifically in community diversity of gut microbiotas and PUFAs in the brain. 15 Hz rTMS treatment alleviates depressive-like behaviors and partially normalized CUMS induced alterations of microbiotas and MLCFAs, especially the abundance of Cyanobacteria, Actinobacteriota, and levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in the hippocampus and PFC.

CONCLUSION

These findings revealed that the modulation of gut microbiotas and PUFAs metabolism might partly contribute to the antidepressant effect of rTMS.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a feasible, non-invasive, neuromodulatory intervention in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. A very first proof of concept

INTRODUCTION

A neurobiological feature of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) is a global decrease in neuronal connectivity, which leads to significant impairments in everyday functionality. Non-invasive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could potentially positively influence neuronal plasticity but has not yet been studied in FASD. The present trial addresses this gap, making it the first-ever study of rTMS in FASD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prospective clinical trial was conducted at the LMU University Hospital Munich and enrolled eight FASD participants aged 6-16. Six sessions of 1 Hz-rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex were administered two times a week for three weeks consisting of 1500 pulses at 90 % of resting motor threshold in four trains of 375s. Outcome measures investigated feasibility and treatment response of rTMS on executive functions, attention/impulsivity, social-emotional regulation and quality of life (QoL) via standardized tests and the FASD parents' app.

RESULTS

Adherence and retention rate were 100 %. Adverse events (AEs) were mild and self-limiting, resulting in a per-session risk of 53.3 %, with local paraesthesia accounting for 54.2 % of the AEs. There were individual relevant but no significant group-level improvements in the investigated functional cerebral domains or participants' QoL. The FASD parents' app showed no significant change in participants' daily functioning or caregivers' QoL. Caregivers' parental stress decreased significantly.

CONCLUSION

FASD is a very complex disorder that is difficult to treat. In addition, comorbidities as atypical responses to pharmacotherapies are frequent. For this reason, non-invasive, innovative therapies for children with FASD have to be developed. For the first time, rTMS was shown to be safe, tolerable, and acceptable and thus well feasible in paediatric patients with FASD. Further clinical studies with larger samples are needed to identify effective stimulation protocols and to evaluate treatment response.

Neurobiological mechanisms of ECT and TMS treatment in depression: study protocol of a multimodal magnetic resonance investigation

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive neurostimulation treatments are increasingly being used to treat major depression, which is a common cause of disability worldwide. While electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are both effective in treating depressive episodes, their mechanisms of action are, however, not completely understood. ECT is given under general anesthesia, where an electrical pulse is administered through electrodes placed on the patient's head to trigger a seizure. ECT is used for the most severe cases of depression and is usually not prescribed before other options have failed. With TMS, brain stimulation is achieved through rapidly changing magnetic fields that induce electric currents underneath a ferromagnetic coil. Its efficacy in depressive episodes has been well documented. This project aims to identify the neurobiological underpinnings of both the effects and side effects of the neurostimulation techniques ECT and TMS.

METHODS

The study will utilize a pre-post case control longitudinal design. The sample will consist of 150 subjects: 100 patients (bipolar and major depressive disorder) who are treated with either ECT (N = 50) or TMS (N = 50) and matched healthy controls (N = 50) not receiving any treatment. All participants will undergo multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well as neuropsychological and clinical assessments at multiple time points before, during and after treatment. Arterial spin labeling MRI at baseline will be used to test whether brain perfusion can predict outcomes. Signs of brain disruption, potentiation and rewiring will be explored with resting-state functional MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy and multishell diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). Clinical outcome will be measured by clinician assessed and patient reported outcome measures. Memory-related side effects will be investigated, and specific tests of spatial navigation to test hippocampal function will be administered both before and after treatment. Blood samples will be stored in a biobank for future analyses. The observation time is 6 months. Data will be explored in light of the recently proposed disrupt, potentiate and rewire (DPR) hypothesis.

DISCUSSION

The study will contribute data and novel analyses important for our understanding of neurostimulation as well as for the development of enhanced and more personalized treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05135897.

The antidepressant effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS): study protocol for a randomized double-blind sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) when applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been shown to be equally effective and safe to treat depression compared to traditional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) paradigms. This protocol describes a funded single-centre, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled, clinical trial to investigate the antidepressive effects of iTBS and factors associated with an antidepressive response.

METHODS

In this trial, outpatients (N = 96, aged 22-65 years) meeting the diagnostic criteria for at least moderate depression (Montgomery and Aasberg Depression Rating Scale score ≥ 20) will be enrolled prospectively and receive ten, once-a-day sessions of either active iTBS or sham iTBS to the left DLPFC, localized via a neuronavigation system. Participants may have any degree of treatment resistance. Prior to stimulation, participants will undergo a thorough safety screening and a brief diagnostic assessment, genetic analysis of brain-derived neurotropic factor, 5-HTTLPR and 5-HT1A, and cerebral MRI assessments. A selection of neuropsychological tests and questionnaires will be administered prior to stimulation and after ten stimulations. An additional follow-up will be conducted 4 weeks after the last stimulation. The first participant was enrolled on June 4, 2022. Study completion will be in December 2027. The project is approved by the Regional Ethical Committee of Medicine and Health Sciences, Northern Norway, project number 228765. The trial will be conducted according to Good Clinical Practice and published safety guidelines on rTMS treatment.

DISCUSSION

The aims of the present trial are to investigate the antidepressive effect of a 10-session iTBS protocol on moderately depressed outpatients and to explore the factors that can explain the reduction in depressive symptoms after iTBS but also a poorer response to the treatment. In separate, but related work packages, the trial will assess how clinical, cognitive, brain imaging and genetic measures at baseline relate to the variability in the antidepressive effects of iTBS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05516095. Retrospectively registered on August 25, 2022.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Therapy for Migraine: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Introduction

This overview of systematic reviews (SRs) systematically collected, evaluated, and combined the evidence for migraine treatment with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature search in various databases, such as PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP, and China Biomedical Literature. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality, risk of bias, reporting quality, and strength of evidence of the included studies using AMSTAR-2, ROBIS, the PRISMA checklist, and the GRADE system.

Results

We performed an overview of 7 relevant SRs, of which 4 were of moderate quality and 3 were of low quality according to AMSTAR 2. All SRs had low risk of bias in Phase 1 (Assessing relevance), Domain 1 (Study eligibility criteria), and Domain 4 (Synthesis and findings) as evaluated by ROBIS. In Domain 2 (Identification and selection of studies), 4 SRs (57.1%) had low risk of bias, while in Domain 3 (data collection and study appraisal) and Risk of Bias in the Review Phase 3, 4 SRs (57.1%) had low risk of bias. The PRISMA reporting standards were generally comprehensive, but some limitations were observed in the assessments, pooled results, evidence reliability, registration and protocols, and funding sources. The GRADE levels ranged from moderate to low, with 10 outcomes of moderate quality and 6 outcomes of low quality. The main reason for the low quality of evidence was the small sample size and high heterogeneity of the available studies.

Conclusion

TMS may improve migraine severity and frequency, but the evidence is limited due to methodological flaws and heterogeneity. Future studies should standardize use, assess side effects, and compare with other treatments.

A randomized trial comparing beam F3 and 5.5 cm targeting in rTMS treatment of depression demonstrates similar effectiveness

BACKGROUND

The Beam F3 and 5.5 cm methods are the two most common targeting strategies for localizing the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) treatment site in repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols. This prospective, randomized, double-blind comparative effectiveness trial assesses the clinical outcomes for these two methods in a naturalistic sample of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) undergoing clinical rTMS treatment.

METHODS

105 adult patients with MDD (mean age = 43.2; range = 18-73; 66% female) were randomized to receive rTMS to the Beam F3 (n = 58) or 5.5 cm (n = 47) target. Between group differences from pre-to post-treatment were evaluated with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) [primary outcome measure], Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and clinician-administered Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Scale (MADRS). Primary treatment endpoint was completion of daily treatment series.

RESULTS

Per-protocol analyses showed no statistically significant differences on any measure between the 5.5 cm and F3 groups (all p ≥ 0.50), including percent improvement (PHQ-9: 39% vs. 39%; GAD-7: 34% vs. 27%; MADRS: 40% vs. 38%), response rate (PHQ-9: 37% vs. 43%; GAD-7: 27% vs. 30%; MADRS: 43% vs. 43%), and remission rate (PHQ-9: 22% vs. 21%; MADRS: 20% vs. 19%). Post hoc analysis of anxiety symptom change while controlling for depression severity suggested more favorable anxiolytic effects with 5.5 cm targeting (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Similar antidepressant effects were observed with DLFPC rTMS using either the Beam F3 or 5.5 cm targeting method, supporting clinical equipoise in MDD patients with head circumference ≤ 60 cm. Comparison to MRI-based targeting and differential effects on anxiety symptoms require further investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03378570.

Personalized functional imaging-guided rTMS on the superior frontal gyrus for post-stroke aphasia: A randomized sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Aphasia affects approximately one-third of stroke patients and yet its rehabilitation outcomes are often unsatisfactory. More effective strategies are needed to promote recovery.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of the theta-burst stimulation (TBS) on the language area in the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) localized by personalized functional imaging, in facilitating post-stroke aphasia recovery.

METHODS

This randomized sham-controlled trial uses a parallel design (intermittent TBS [iTBS] in ipsilesional hemisphere vs. continuous TBS [cTBS] in contralesional hemisphere vs. sham group). Participants had aphasia symptoms resulting from their first stroke in the left hemisphere at least one month prior. Participants received three-week speech-language therapy coupled with either active or sham stimulation applied to the left or right SFG. The primary outcome was the change in Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R) aphasia quotient after the three-week treatment. The secondary outcome was WAB-R aphasia quotient improvement after one week of treatment.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients were screened between January 2021 and January 2022, 45 of whom were randomized and 44 received intervention (15 in each active group, 14 in sham). Both iTBS (estimated difference = 14.75, p < 0.001) and cTBS (estimated difference = 13.43, p < 0.001) groups showed significantly greater improvement than sham stimulation after the 3-week intervention and immediately after one week of treatment (p's < 0.001). The adverse events observed were similar across groups. A seizure was recorded three days after the termination of the treatment in the iTBS group.

CONCLUSION

The stimulation showed high efficacy and SFG is a promising stimulation target for post-stroke language recovery.

A century of research on neuromodulation interventions: A scientometric analysis of trends and knowledge maps

Interest in neurostimulation interventions has significantly grown in recent decades, yet a scientometric analysis objectively mapping scientific knowledge and recent trends remains unpublished. Using relevant keywords, we conducted a search in the Web of Science Core Collection on September 23, 2022, retrieving a total of 47,681 documents with 987,979 references. We identified two prominent research trends: 'noninvasive brain stimulation' and 'invasive brain stimulation.' These methods have interconnected over time, forming a cluster focused on evidence synthesis. Noteworthy emerging research trends encompassed 'transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation,' 'DBS/epilepsy in the pediatric population,' 'spinal cord stimulation,' and 'brain-machine interface.' While progress has been made for various neurostimulation interventions, their approval as adjuvant treatments remains limited, and optimal stimulation parameters lack consensus. Enhancing communication between experts of both neurostimulation types and encouraging novel translational research could foster further development. These findings offer valuable insights for funding agencies and research groups, guiding future directions in the field.

Association between Mood and Sensation Seeking Following rTMS

Previous studies investigating mood changes in healthy subjects after prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have shown largely inconsistent results. This may be due to methodological issues, considerable inter-individual variation in prefrontal connectivity or other factors, e.g., personality traits. This pilot study investigates whether mood changes after rTMS are affected by personality parameters. In a randomized cross-over design, 17 healthy volunteers received three sessions of 1 Hz rTMS to Fz, F3 and T3 (10/20 system). The T3 electrode site served as the control condition with the coil angled 45° to the scalp. Subjective mood was rated at baseline and after each condition. Personality traits were assessed using the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) and the Sensation Seeking Scale (SSS). For all conditions, a significant association between mood changes towards a deterioration in mood and SSS scores was observed. There were no differences between conditions and no correlations between mood changes and NEO-FFI. The data show that sensation-seeking personality has an impact on subjective mood changes following prefrontal rTMS in all conditions. Future studies investigating the effects of rTMS on emotional paradigms should include individual measures of sensation-seeking personality. The pre-selection of subjects according to personality criteria may reduce the variability in results.

Robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a pilot study

There has been an increasing demand for robotic coil positioning during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment. Accurate coil positioning is crucial because rTMS generally targets specific brain regions for both research and clinical application with other reasons such as safety, consistency and reliability and individual variablity. Some previous studies have employed industrial robots or co-robots and showed they can more precisely stimulate the target cortical regions than traditional manual methods. In this study, we not only developed a custom-TMS robot for better TMS coil placement but also analyzed the therapeutic effects on depression. Treatment effects were evaluated by measuring regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) using single-photon emission computed tomography and depression severity before and after rTMS for the two positioning methods. The rTMS preparation time with our robotic coil placement was reduced by 53% compared with that of the manual method. The position and orientation errors were also significantly reduced from 11.17 mm and 4.06° to 0.94 mm and 0.11°, respectively, confirming the superiority of robotic positioning. The results from clinical and neuroimaging assessments indicated comparable improvements in depression severity and rCBF in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex between the robotic and manual rTMS groups. A questionnaire was used to determine the patients' feelings about the robotic system, including the safety and preparation time. A high safety score indicated good acceptability of robotic rTMS at the clinical site.

Preliminary Observations of Personalized Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation (PrTMS) Guided by EEG Spectra for Concussion

There are no FDA-approved treatments for the chronic sequelae of concussion. Repetitive magnetic transcranial stimulation (rTMS) has been explored as a therapy but outcomes have been inconsistent. To address this we developed a personalized rTMS (PrTMS) protocol involving continual rTMS stimulus frequency adjustment and progressive activation of multiple cortical sites, guided by spectral electroencephalogram (EEG)-based analyses and psychological questionnaires. We acquired pilot clinical data for 185 symptomatic brain concussion patients who underwent the PrTMS protocol over an approximate 6 week period. The PrTMS protocol used a proprietary EEG spectral frequency algorithm to define an initial stimulation frequency based on an anteriorly graded projection of the measured occipital alpha center peak, which was then used to interpolate and adjust regional stimulation frequency according to weekly EEG spectral acquisitions. PrTMS improved concussion indices and normalized the cortical alpha band center frequency and peak EEG amplitude. This potentially reflected changed neurotransmitter, cognitive, and perceptual status. PrTMS may be a promising treatment choice for patients with persistent concussion symptoms. This clinical observational study was limited in that there was no control group and a number of variables were not recorded, such as time since injury and levels of depression. While the present observations are indeed preliminary and cursory, they may suggest further prospective research on PrTMS in concussion, and exploration of the spectral EEG as a concussion biomarker, with the ultimate goals of confirmation and determining optimal PrTMS treatment parameters.