Direct and Indirect Costs Among Caregivers of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Attempt

Impact of living with an adult with depressive symptoms among households in the United States

BACKGROUND

The effect of depressive symptoms on individuals has been widely studied but their impact on households remains less explored. This study assessed the humanistic and economic impact of living with an adult with depressive symptoms on adults without depressive symptoms among households in the United States (US).

METHODS

The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) Household Component database was used to identify adults without depressive symptoms living in households with ≥1 adult with depressive symptoms (depression household) and adults without depressive symptoms living in households without an adult with depressive symptoms (no-depression household). Weighted generalized linear models with clustered standard errors were used to compare total income (USD 2020), employment status, workdays missed, quality of life (QoL), and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) between cohorts.

RESULTS

Adults without depressive symptoms living in a depression household (n = 1699) earned $4720 less in total annual income (representing 11.3% lower than the average income of $41,634 in MEPS), were less likely to be employed, missed more workdays per year, and had lower QoL than adults without depressive symptoms living in a no-depression household (n = 15,286). Differences in total annual healthcare costs and for most types of HRU, except for increased outpatient mental health-related visits, were not significant.

LIMITATIONS

Data is subject to reporting bias, misclassification, and other inaccuracies. Causal inferences could not be established.

CONCLUSION

The economic and humanistic consequences of depressive symptoms may extend beyond the affected adults and impact other adult members of the household.

Disability and workers' compensation trends for employees with mental disorders and SUDs in the United States

Introduction

US employee absence benefits may include workers' compensation (WC) for work-related injuries/illnesses, short- and long-term disability (STD and LTD, respectively) for non–work-related injuries/illnesses, and discretionary sick leave (SL). Absences can significantly impact business performance, and employers are intensifying efforts to manage benefits and connections with employee health. This research compares all-cause STD/LTD/WC/SL use and variation from baseline (2002) for eligible employees (EMPs) with mental disorders (MDs) and SUDs to determine if use/payments varied over time.

Methods

Employees incurring medical claims with Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality MD and SUD ICD-9/10 codes were identified in the WorkPartners database (January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2019). Retrospective analysis was performed on annual prevalence, benefit use, mean days of leave, and median payments as a percent of salary (including lump-sum distributions and potentially extending beyond initiation year). WC claims without work absences were excluded. For each benefit, annual outcomes were calculated as a percent of baseline to show variability.

Results

Use was 48.1% to 202.2% (median, 102.8%) of baseline rates for SL (SUD-EMPs), and 87.3% to 108.4% (median, 97.3%) for STD (MD-EMPs). Days of LTD leaves were 21.5% to 657.8% (median, 359.2%) of baseline days (MD-EMPs), and 122.7% to 1042.2% (median, 460.0%) of baseline days for (SUD-EMPs). Median payments for WC were 78.6% to 253.6% (median, 114.6%) of baseline (MD-EMPs) and 97.9% to 481.6% (median, 104.0%) for SUD-EMPs.

Discussion

Employees with MD/SUD used absence benefits at differing rates over time with varying days of leave and payments as a percent of salary. Using a constant cost or salary replacement factor over time for all benefits is not accurate or appropriate.