Immediate versus delayed intramedullary nailing for open fractures of the tibial shaft: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting deep infection and fracture healing

Impact of Surgical Timing on Fracture Healing in Tibial Shaft Injuries: A Comparative Review of Intramedullary Nailing Techniques

Tibial shaft fractures are a prevalent and challenging orthopedic injury, often resulting from high-energy trauma. Optimal management of these fractures is crucial to prevent complications such as nonunion, malunion, and prolonged functional impairment. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is widely regarded as the gold standard for treating these injuries due to its ability to provide stable fixation, preserve soft tissues, and enable early mobilization. However, the timing of surgical intervention remains a topic of ongoing debate. Early surgical intervention, defined as surgery within 24-48 hours of injury, is advocated for its potential to reduce hospital stay, facilitate early mobilization, and decrease the risk of secondary complications such as compartment syndrome. Conversely, delayed intervention allows for patient stabilization and reduction of soft tissue swelling, potentially lowering the risk of infection and other complications. This comprehensive review aims to evaluate the impact of surgical timing on fracture healing outcomes in tibial shaft fractures treated with IMN. It explores the benefits and limitations of early versus delayed surgery, emphasizing their influence on union rates, healing time, and complication rates. Furthermore, the review examines different IMN techniques, including reamed versus unreamed and static versus dynamic nailing, to determine their role in optimizing fracture healing. By synthesizing current evidence, this review provides critical insights into the optimal timing and technique for IMN in tibial shaft fractures, ultimately aiming to guide clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes. Future research should focus on randomized controlled trials to establish standardized surgical timing and technique selection guidelines in this patient population.

Frequency of complications in intramedullary nailing of open tibial shaft fractures: a systematic review

Background

Open tibial shaft fractures comprise almost 45% of all open fractures and are frequently the result of high-energy trauma. Due to contamination, limited soft tissue coverage of the tibial shaft and poor tibial blood supply, open tibial shaft fractures are associated with high rates of complication including malunion, non-union and infection. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is a mainstay of treatment. This study aims to determine the frequency of the various complications in this cohort.

Methods

A systematic review of papers published on Embase, PubMed and Cochrane databases pertaining to the use of IMN to fix open tibial shaft fractures were included. The available evidence was collated in regard to the incidence of union, malunion, non-union and infection seen in this cohort.

Results

A total of 2767 citations were reviewed, and 17 studies comprising 1850 patients were included in the analysis. There was a delayed union rate of 22.4%, malunion rate of 8.3%, non-union rate of 9.7% and infection rate of 8.1% (95% CI: 5.7%-10.8%) in this patient cohort. Subgroup analysis showed a 3-fold increase in non-union and a 2-fold increase in deep infection among Gustilo III injuries compared to Gustilo I and II.

Conclusions

IMN for open tibial shaft fractures results in high rates of union and low rates of infection, comparable to figures seen in closed injuries and superior to those seen with alternative methods of fixation. There is a substantially increased risk of complication associated with Gustilo III injuries, reinforcing the significance of the soft tissue injury in these patients.

Incidence, costs and post-operative complications following ankle fracture - A US claims database analysis

BACKGROUND

The epidemiology and payer costs for ankle fractures are not well documented. This study evaluated: (1) the incidence of ankle fracture and ankle surgery following fracture in the US population; and (2) the clinical presentation of patients presenting with ankle fractures requiring surgery, their complication rates, and payer costs.

METHODS

Patients in the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases with an inpatient/outpatient diagnosis of ankle fracture from 2016 to 2019 were stratified by age group and gender, and rates of fracture per 10,000 enrollees were estimated. Surgically-treated patients between January 2016 - October 2021 were further analyzed. One-year post-surgical outcomes evaluated complication rates (e.g., infection, residual pain), reoperations, and 1-year payments. Standard descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables and outcomes. Generalized linear models were designed to estimate payments for surgical care and incremental payments associated with postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Fracture cases affected 0.14% of the population; 23.4% of fractures required surgery. Pediatric and elderly patients were at increased risk. From 3 weeks to 12 months following index ankle surgery, 5.5% (5.3% - 5.7%) of commercially insured and 5.9% (5.1% - 6.8%) of Medicare patients required a new surgery. Infection was observed in 4.4% (4.2% - 4.6%) commercially insured and 9.8% (8.8% - 10.9%) Medicare patients, and residual pain 3 months post-surgery was observed in 29.5% (28.7% - 30.3%) commercially-insured and 39.3% (36.0% - 42.6%) Medicare patients. Commercial payments for index surgery ranged from $9,821 (95% CI: $9,697 - $9,945) in the ambulatory surgical center to $28,169 (95% CI: $27,780 - $28,559) in the hospital inpatient setting, and from $16,775 (95% CI: $16,668 - $16,882) in patients with closed fractures, to $41,206 (95% CI: $38,795 - $43,617) in patients with Gustilo III fractures. Incremental commercial payments for pain and infection averaged $5,200 (95% CI: $4,261 - $6,139) and $27,510 (95% CI: $21,759 - $33,261), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ankle fracture has a high incidence and complication rate. Residual pain affects more than one-third of all patients. Ankle fracture thus presents a significant societal impact in terms of patient outcomes and payer burden.

Outcome and risk factors for recurrence of early onset fracture-related infections treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention: Results of a large retrospective multicentre cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Early Fracture-Related Infections (FRIs) are a common entity in hospitals treating trauma patients and are often treated with a Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) procedure. Aims of this study were to 1) evaluate the recurrence rate after DAIR procedures for early onset FRI, 2) establish the number of surgical procedures to gain control of the initial infection and 3) identify independent predictors for recurrence in this cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective multicentre cohort study was conducted in two level 1 trauma centres. Consecutive patients who underwent a DAIR procedure between January 1st 2015 and July 1st 2020 for confirmed FRI with an onset of <6 weeks after the latest osseous operation were included. Recorded data included patient demographics, treatment characteristics and follow-up. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess predictors for recurrent FRI.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients with early FRI were included in this study with a median age of 54.0 years (interquartile range (IQR) 34.5-64.0). The recurrence rate of FRI was 13% (n = 19) at one year follow-up and 18% (n = 25) at 23.1 months (IQR 15.3-36.4) follow-up. Infection control was achieved in 94% (n = 127/135) of cases. In total, 73 patients (52%) underwent at least two surgical procedures to treat the ongoing initial episode of FRI, of whom 54 patients (74%) required two to three procedures and 17 patients (23%) four to five procedures. Predictors for recurrent FRI were use of an intramedullary nail during index operation (odds ratio (OR) 4.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-13.8)), need for additional surgical procedures to treat ongoing infection during the treatment period following the first presentation of early FRI (OR 1.9 (95% CI 1.1-3.5)) and a decreased Injury Severity Score (ISS) (inverted OR 1.1 (95% CI 1.0-1.1)).

CONCLUSION

The recurrence rate after treatment of early onset FRI in patients treated with a DAIR procedure was 18% at 23.1 months follow-up. At least two surgical procedures to gain control of the initial infection were needed in 52% of patients. Independent predictors for recurrent FRI were the use of an intramedullary nail during index operation, need for additional surgical procedures and a decreased ISS.

Outcomes after primary intramedullary nail fixation of open tibial and femoral fractures in low resource settings

INTRODUCTION

Open fractures are unique in the urgency they impart to the injury and the therapeutic challenge they pose. Non-union and infection are among the major concerns. Open tibial and femoral shaft fractures are among the commonest orthopaedic urgencies. Primary intramedullary (IM) nailing requires a skillset and knowledge of the principles of open fracture management and also a well-equipped operating room with the necessary implants and instruments. In a low resource setting, one or more of these prerequisites may not be met, and the outcome may thus be affected similarly. The objective of this study was to study these outcomes.

METHODS

We prospectively studied primary IM nailing of open 1, 2 and 3A tibial and femoral fractures done in our hospital, in a simple non-modular operating room without an image intensifier.

RESULTS

There were 106 fractures in 104 patients: 93 tibial and 13 femoral. The mean time from injury to surgical debridement was 19.6 h. Mean duration of antibiotics therapy was 4.3 days, and the mean duration of hospital stay was 4.1 days. All patients were followed up to union. Mean time to radiographic union was 6.1 months for the tibia and 5.7 months for the femur. Non-union was seen in 4 tibial and 1 femoral fractures. There were 3 superficial infections but no deep infection.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes were comparable to, and in some cases better than, those found in existing literature. We conclude that primary IM nailing in open long bone fractures can be performed in austere environments with good success, in expert hands if the principles are adhered to.

Risk factors for nonunion following surgically managed, traumatic, diaphyseal fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Management of Gustilo-Anderson IIIB open tibial fractures in adults-a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Open tibial fractures are the most common open long bone fracture, despite this, the management of these complex injuries still remains a topic of discussion amongst orthopaedic surgeons.

SOURCES OF DATA

We searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE and Google Scholar and a systematic review of 7500 articles, leaving 23 after exclusion criteria were applied, in order to analyse the management of open tibial fractures.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT AND CONTROVERSY

Infection was noted to be the most significant concern amongst authors, with definitive external fixation having a high rate of superficial pin-site infection and internal fixation having a high deep infection rate.

GROWING POINTS

It is essential to have a combined ortho-plastic approach to the management of these fractures as muscle flaps were the most common form of soft tissue coverage.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

A national pragmatic trial into the management of open tibial fractures is required looking at fixation methods and soft tissue coverage, with at least a 2-year follow-up in order to ascertain the most appropriate management of these fractures and patient-related outcomes.

Intramedullary Antibiotic Depot Does Not Preclude Successful Intramedullary Lengthening or Compression

SUMMARY

The challenging problem of long bone infection and limb length difference cannot be addressed using only an antibiotic-coated nonmagnetic static nail. The combined use of resorbable calcium sulfate and magnetic lengthening nails offers a possible solution to this dilemma, as well as for infected nonunions that require compression. We present a combined technique to treat or prevent infection using femoral or tibial intramedullary antibiotic delivery with an absorbable calcium sulfate depot and concomitant internal lengthening or compression using a nail. Adequate débridement is required in cases of established infection and is a prerequisite for this technique.

Risk factors for complications after primary intramedullary nailing to treat tibial shaft fractures: A cohort study of 184 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary nailing is the standard of care for tibial shaft fractures. The risk factors for infectious and/or mechanical complications, notably non-union, remain incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate risk factors for complications, notably non-union.

HYPOTHESIS

Active smoking and an initial open wound are independent risk factors for complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively included consecutive patients managed for open or closed tibial shaft fractures by primary intramedullary nailing between 2013 and 2018. We collected data on preoperative factors related to the patient and to the mechanism of injury (age, sex, smoking history, energy of the trauma, open wound), on intraoperative factors (residual interfragmentary gap), and on postoperative factors (early or delayed weight-bearing). We evaluated the associations between these factors and the occurrence of complications, notably non-union, by performing a univariate analysis followed by a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

We included 184 patients [mean age, 38.5±17.6 (range, 15-91), 72.2% of males]. One or more complications developed in 28 (15.2%) patients and non-union occurred in 15 (8.1%) patients. There were three significant risk factors for complications: active smoking (OR, 7.93; 95%CI, 2.76-22.7), a residual interfragmentary gap >5mm (OR, 4.92; 95%CI, 1.72-14.02), and an initial open wound (OR,5.16; 95%CI, 1.62-16.43) (p<0.05). The same three factors were significant risk factors for non-union. Energy of the trauma, age, sex, and early or delayed weight bearing were not significantly associated with an excess risk of complications.

DISCUSSION

Active smoking, a residual interfragmentary gap >5mm, and an initial open wound are risk factors for postoperative complications after intramedullary nailing to treat a tibial shaft fracture. Preventive strategies and specific information could be implemented for these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; single-centre retrospective cohort study.

A Reevaluation of the Risk of Infection Based on Time to Debridement in Open Fractures: Results of the GOLIATH Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies and Limited Trial Data

BACKGROUND

Open fractures are one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. The threshold time to debridement that reduces the infection rate is unclear.

METHODS

We searched all available databases to identify observational studies and randomized trials related to open fracture care. We then conducted an extensive meta-analysis of the observational studies, using raw and adjusted estimates, to determine if there was an association between the timing of initial debridement and infection.

RESULTS

We identified 84 studies (18,239 patients) for the primary analysis. In unadjusted analyses comparing various "late" time thresholds for debridement versus "early" thresholds, there was an association between timing of debridement and surgical site infection (odds ratio [OR] = 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 1.49, p < 0.001, I2 = 30%, 84 studies, n = 18,239). For debridement performed between 12 and 24 hours versus earlier than 12 hours, the OR was higher in tibial fractures (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.87, p = 0.05, I2 = 19%, 12 studies, n = 2,065), and even more so in Gustilo type-IIIB tibial fractures (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.89, p = 0.004, I2 = 23%, 12 studies, n = 1,255). An analysis of Gustilo type-III fractures showed a progressive increase in the risk of infection with time. Critical time thresholds included 12 hours (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.28 to 1.78, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%, 16 studies, n = 3,502) and 24 hours (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.73 to 2.72, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%, 29 studies, n = 5,214).

CONCLUSIONS

High-grade open fractures demonstrated an increased risk of infection with progressive delay to debridement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instruction for Authors for a complete description of the levels of evidence.

Prevalence and influencing factors of nonunion in patients with tibial fracture: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of nonunion in patients with tibia fracture and the association between influencing factors and tibia fracture nonunion.

METHOD

A database searches of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Weipu database, and Wanfang database from inception until June 2019 was conducted. The pooled prevalence, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with Stata software.

RESULTS

In this study, 111 studies involving 41,429 subjects were included. In the study of the relationship between influencing factors and tibia fracture nonunion, 15 factors significantly influenced the fracture union, including > 60 years old, male, tobacco smoker, body mass index > 40, diabetes, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) user, opioids user, fracture of middle and distal tibia, high-energy fracture, open fracture, Gustilo-Anderson grade IIIB or IIIC, Müller AO Classification of Fractures C, open reduction, fixation model, and infection.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of nonunion in patients with tibia fracture was 0.068 and 15 potential factors were associated with the prevalence. Closed reduction and minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) have the low risks of nonunion for the treatment of tibial fractures.

Predictors of mechanical complications after intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary (IM) nailing is the gold standard treatment for tibial shaft fractures, but can be associated with various mechanical complications, including delayed union.

HYPOTHESIS

We believe that complications do not occur randomly, but in certain conditions that contribute to their development. Risk factors likely to predict delayed union can be identified to support prevention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 171 fractures treated by IM nailing between 2005 and 2015 was reviewed retrospectively. Independent variables included intrinsic, patient-related factors and extrinsic factors such as those related to the fracture or surgery. A multiple logistic regression model was used to determine which factors can predict each type of complication.

RESULTS

Delayed union occurred in 22.8% of patients. Smoking and high-energy trauma were risk factors. Hardware breakage was significantly reduced (p<0.05) when the nail diameter was greater than 10mm. A nail diameter/reamer diameter ratio outside the recommended limits (0.80-0.99) was more likely to be associated with screw failure. Diabetes is a risk factor for hardware migration, which itself is associated with other complications.

DISCUSSION

Nonunion is the most common complication after IM nailing of tibial shaft fractures. Smoking cessation after a fracture is necessary in our opinion, even if the literature is ambivalent on this aspect and stopping to smoke once the fracture occurs may not be sufficient to prevent a poor outcome. Use of a nail diameter/reamer diameter between 0.80 and 0.99 favors union and prevents hardware breakage. Hardware migration in a diabetic patient may be a warning sign of other types of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study. Level IV.

Definitive Management of Open Tibia Fractures Using Limb Reconstruction System

INTRODUCTION

Open fractures are treated as surgical emergency and early administration of intravenous antibiotic coupled with early irrigation and debridement decreases the infection rate dramatically. Limb Reconstruction System (LRS) is a unilateral rail system which consists of Shanz pins, rail rods and sliding clamps. It is specifically designed to enable the surgeon to perform simple and effective surgery as it offers rigid fixation of fracture fragments, allowing early weight bearing and reduces economic burden.

AIM

To determine the efficacy of Limb Reconstruction System for treatment of compound tibia fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was carried out where in 54 cases out of 412 compound tibia fractures having Modified Gustilo Anderson Type IIIA and IIIB with a mean age of 42±5 years were treated using LRS over a period of 26 months. Limb reconstruction system was used in acute docking mode or with corticotomy and bone transport was done depending upon the bone loss. The soft tissue condition was assessed and split thickness skin grafting and flap repairs were done as per the need. Clinical and radiological assessment was done at every follow-up. Bony and functional assessment was done by Association for the Study and Application of the Methods of Illizarov (ASAMI) criteria.

RESULTS

Among 54 patients, bony results as per ASAMI score were excellent in 36, good in 14, fair in 2 and poor in 2 patients. Functional results were excellent in 43, good in 7, fair in 4 patients. The average fracture union time was 8 months. Post-surgery patient satisfaction was excellent since fixation allowed weight bearing immediately. Average hospital stay was 7 days and financial burden was reduced by 40% as compared to multi staged surgery. The average time of return to work was 20 days.

CONCLUSION

LRS is an easy, simple and definitive surgical procedure that allows immediate full weight bearing walking. It reduces hospital stay, is cost effective with excellent patient compliance and can also be used for bone lengthening/transportation.

Risk factors for long bone fracture non-union: a stratification approach based on the level of the existing scientific evidence

Non-union continues to be the most devastating complication after fracture fixation. Its treatment can be prolonged and often unpredictable. The burden to the patient, surgeon and health care system can be immense. Strategies to prevent it and or identify early its development are desirable in order to improve the clinical course of the affected patients and their outcomes. We undertook a systematic review of the literature in order to identify the most common and important risk factors based on the hierarchy of level of evidence. Accordingly, a stratification scale was formed which highlighted 10 risk factors including; an open method of fracture reduction, open fracture, presence of post-surgical fracture gap, smoking, infection, wedge or comminuted types of fracture, high degree of initial fracture displacement, lack of adequate mechanical stability provided by the implant used, fracture location in the poor zone of vascularity of the affected bone, and the presence of the fracture in the tibia. Clinicians should take in to account these findings when managing patients with long bone fractures, particularly the femur and tibia in order to minimise the risk of non-union.

The ortho-plastic approach to soft tissue management in trauma

Fractures with associated soft tissue injuries, or those termed 'open,' are not uncommon. There has been much discussion regarding there management, with the guidance from the combined British Orthopaedic Association and British Association and Aesthetic Surgeons teams widely accepted as the gold level of therapy. We aim to discuss the current evidence about the initial management of this group of injuries, taking a journey from arrival in the accident and emergency department through to the point of definitive closure. Other modes of therapy are also reviewed.

Open tibial fractures grade IIIC treated successfully with external fixation, negative-pressure wound therapy and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 7

The aim of the therapy in open tibial fractures grade III was to cover the bone with soft tissue and achieve healed fracture without persistent infection. Open tibial fractures grade IIIC with massive soft tissue damage require combined orthopaedic, vascular and plastic-reconstructive procedures. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), used in two consecutive cases with open fracture grade IIIC of the tibia diaphysis, healed extensive soft tissue defect with exposure of the bone. NPWT eventually allowed for wound closure by split skin graft within 21-25 days. Ilizarov external fixator combined with application of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 at the site of delayed union enhanced definitive bone healing within 16-18 months.

Intramedullary nailing after external fixation of the femur and tibia: a review of advantages and limits

PURPOSE AND METHODS

External fixation is a safe option for stabilisation of extremity lesions in the polytraumatised patient as well as in fractures with severe soft tissue damage. Nevertheless, long-term-complications are to be expected when external fixation is chosen as a definitive treatment. The purpose of this review article is twofold: primarily, to define the rationale of a procedural change from an external fixator to an intramedullary nail; secondarily, to assess the possible advantages and pitfalls of a single- or two-staged procedure.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

External fixation of the femur is recommended in multiply injured patients who are critically ill to avoid an additional inflammatory response caused by the surgical trauma of primary nailing. The conversion towards nailing must be done as soon as the clinical condition of the patient has been stabilised. Stable polytraumatised patients do not benefit from initial stabilisation with an external fixator and should immediately be treated with a definitive osteosynthesis. In tibial fractures, external fixation followed by intramedullary nailing is recommendable in fractures with severe soft tissue injuries. Conversion should be done as soon as the soft tissues allow before pin-tract infections occur and performed in a one-staged procedure.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the additional benefit of local prophylactic antibiotic therapy for infection rates in open tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing

PURPOSE

This analysis compared the rate of deep wound infections in patients with open tibia fractures, treated with intramedullary nails, receiving additional locally-delivered antibiotics to those receiving standard care.

METHODS

Two systematic literature searches identified studies reporting infection rates in patients treated with intramedullary nails for tibia fractures receiving systemic antibiotics only (search one) and in patients receiving adjunctive locally-administered antibiotics peri-operatively at the tissue-implant interface (search two). After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 and seven papers from searches one and two, respectively, were included in meta-analyses.

RESULTS

The absolute rate of infection was lower for all Gustilo-Anderson grades of tibia fractures when local antibiotics were administered as adjunctive prophylactic therapy. For severe fractures, classified as GAIII fractures, patients receiving systemic antibiotics only had an infection rate of 14.4 % [95 % CI: 10.5 %, 18.5 %]; adding local antibiotics reduced the rate to 2.4 % [0.0 %, 9.4 %], with an odds ratio of 0.17. Risk of deep wound infections increased with severity of fracture, rising to over 31 % in GIIIB&C fractures for patients receiving systematic antibiotics only, but to below 9 % with additional local antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

The findings support consideration of augmenting the antibiotic prophylaxis regimen to include locally-delivered antibiotics. Patients with severe fractures will obtain greatest benefit from infections avoided. No trial directly compared the two treatments for open tibia fractures, limiting the ability to attribute the differences in observed infection rates directly to the treatments themselves. A large comparative study to improve the evidence on relative effect size is merited.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Prevalence of complications of open tibial shaft fractures stratified as per the Gustilo-Anderson classification

The aim of the present study was to comparatively analyse certain outcome measures of open tibial fractures, stratified per grade of open injury and method of treatment. For this purpose, a systematic review of the English literature from 1990 until 2010 was undertaken, comprising 32 eligible articles reporting on 3060 open tibial fractures. Outcome measures included rates of union progress (early union, delayed union, late union and non-union rates) and certain complication rates (deep infection, compartment syndrome and amputation rates). Statistical heterogeneity across component studies was detected with the use of Cochran chi-square and I(2) tests. In the absence of significant statistical heterogeneity a pooled estimate of effect size for each outcome/complication of interest was produced. All component studies were assigned on average a moderate quality score. Reamed tibial nails (RTNs) were associated with significantly higher odds of early union compared with unreamed tibial nails (UTNs) in IIIB open fractures (odds ratio: 12, 95% CI: 2.4-61). Comparing RTN and UTN modes of treatment, no significant differences were documented per grade of open fractures with respect to both delayed and late union rates. Surprisingly, nonunion rates in IIIB open fractures treated with either RTNs or UTNs were lower than IIIA or II open fractures, although the differences were not statistically significant. Significantly increased deep infection rates of IIIB open fractures compared with all other grades were documented for both modes of treatment (RTN, UTN). However, lower deep infection rates for IIIA open fractures treated with RTNs were recorded compared with grades I and II. Interestingly, grade II open tibial fractures, treated with UTN, presented significantly greater odds for developing compartment syndrome than when treated with RTNs. Our cumulative analysis, providing for each grade of open injury and each particular method of treatment a summarised estimate of effect size for the most important outcome measures of open tibial fractures, constitutes a useful tool of the practicing surgeon for optimal decision making when operative treatment of such fractures is contemplated.

Recent advances in the use of serological bone formation markers to monitor callus development and fracture healing

The failure of an osseous fracture to heal, or the development of a nonunion, is common; however, current diagnostic measures lack the capability of early and reliable detection of such events. Analyses of radiographic imaging and clinical examination, in combination, remain the gold standard for diagnosis; however, these methods are not reliable for early detection. Delayed diagnosis of a nonunion is costly from both the patient and treatment standpoints. In response, repeated efforts have been made to identify bone metabolic markers as diagnostic or prognostic tools for monitoring bone healing. Thus far, the evidence regarding a correlation between the kinetics of most bone metabolic markers and nonunion is very limited. With the aim of classifying the role of biological pathways of bone metabolism and of understanding bone conditions in the development of osteoporosis, advances have been made in our knowledge of the molecular basis of bone remodeling, fracture healing, and its failure. Procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide has been shown to be a reliable bone formation marker in osteoporosis therapy and its kinetics during fracture healing has been recently described. In this article, we suggest that procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide presents a good opportunity for early detection of nonunion. We also review the role and potential of serum PINP, as well as other markers, as indications of fracture healing.