Percutaneous Sacroiliac Screw Placement: A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Robot-assisted Navigation Procedures with a Conventional Technique

Fragility Fractures of the Pelvic Ring: Analysis of Epidemiology, Treatment Concepts, and Surgical Strategies from the Registry of the German Pelvic Multicenter Study Group

Background: Fragility fractures of the pelvic ring (FFPs) represent a fast-growing entity in geriatric traumatology with increasing incidence worldwide. This study aimed to analyze the epidemiology, treatment concepts, and surgical strategies for FFPs based on data collected by the German Pelvic Multicenter Study Group documented in the German Pelvic Fracture Registry. It is the largest cohort study of its kind. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 65 years or older after FFPs, as classified according to the Rommens and Hofmann classification. Data were collected from July 2018 onward and analyzed for demographics; fracture classifications; treatment modalities (operative vs. non-operative); and details of surgery, including timing and choice of implants. Patients after high-energy trauma were excluded. Statistical analyses included descriptive metrics and subgroup comparisons. Results: Among 1242 patients (84% female; median age 83.4 years), FFP Type II was the most common fracture type (50.8%), followed by Type IV (21.1%). Non-operative management was employed in 68.8% of cases, while 30.9% underwent surgery. Surgical intervention was more frequent in higher-grade FFPs (e.g., 72.1% in Type IV). The most common surgical technique for the posterior pelvic ring was percutaneous screw fixation (61.3%), with navigation used in 47.4% of cases. Conclusions: This study highlights the variability in treatment strategies for FFPs, with conservative management predominating in lower-grade fractures and surgical approaches increasingly utilized for more complex cases. The findings underscore the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines and further research to optimize treatment and long-term outcomes for geriatric patients with FFPs.

Telesurgery: current status and strategies for latency reduction

Telesurgery is a rapidly evolving field in robotic assisted surgery that allows surgeons to operate on patients remotely with the help of robotic systems. This has allowed increased access to specialized care reducing geographic barriers and improving overall surgical outcomes in remote locations. An important challenge that hinders its widespread adoption is latency period which is primarily a delay that exists in data transmission between the surgeon and the robotic system. It is essential to determine strategies that can reduce it to ensure greater precision, dexterity, and patient safety. A literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. After screening the articles for relevance, data were synthesized to present a narrative review on the current challenges and emerging solutions in latency reduction. Those articles were included that discussed telesurgery with latency periods, network infrastructure, AI driven latency compensation, and cybersecurity. After removing 8 duplicates, a total of 238 articles were identified in the literature search out of which 175 articles were excluded after title and abstract screening done by two independent reviewers. 63 full text articles were assessed for eligibility. Latency period greatly impacts telesurgical performance with an ideal value being less than 200 ms. This threshold is essential for effective surgical precision, and safety. The adoption of ultra-low latency 6G wireless networks, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence can enhance telesurgical performance. Ethical, legal, and cybersecurity challenges must be addressed for widespread adoption of telesurgery. Latency in telesurgery arise due to a multitude of factors, including network infrastructure, geographic barriers, cybersecurity protocols, hardware, and software limitations. AI-based algorithms, edge computing, advancements in 5G technology, along with optimum haptic feedback mechanisms are promising solutions in reducing latency.

Robot-assisted percutaneous scaphoid fixation: patient-reported outcomes and learning curve at two centres

This study describes patient-reported outcomes of robot-assisted percutaneous scaphoid fracture fixation of 62 patients from two medical centres and the learning curve of this new technique. One attempt to place the guidewire was sufficient in 97% of cases. All fractures achieved radiographic union at a mean of 9 weeks. There were no complications observed. At a mean follow-up of 36 months (range 12-68 months), the mean patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) was 2 (range 0-22) and the mean Mayo Wrist Score was 96 (range 70-100). After the initial ten to 20 cases, the learning phase was reasonably surmountable with a marked reduction of operative duration and improvement of the screw accuracy.Level of evidence: IV.

Robot-Assisted Screw Fixation Combined With Endoscopic Bone Graft in the Minimally Invasive Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolysis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

Spondylolysis, often progressing to spondylolisthesis, commonly defies conservative treatment in refractory cases, indicating a need for surgery. Robot-assisted techniques may provide a stable and effective minimally invasive approach for the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis. To compare the clinical efficacy between robot-assisted percutaneous screw fixation combined with endoscopic bone graft and conventional open screw fixation with bone graft in the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis.

METHODS

A cohort study involving 43 individuals with lumbar spondylolysis who underwent surgical treatment was conducted. From January 2022 to June 2023, 20 patients underwent percutaneous screw fixation combined with endoscopic bone graft while 23 patients underwent conventional open screw fixation with bone graft. The demographic data, parameters related to robotic surgery, perioperative indicators, VAS and ODI scores, pedicle screw accuracy, radiographic fusion outcomes, and follow-up results were systematically recorded, analyzed, and then compared between the two groups. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests, and continuous variables were evaluated with t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests following normality assessment, with statistical significance at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Compared with the conventional surgery group, the robot-assisted surgery group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative drainage, shorter hospital stay, less intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and radiation exposure dose (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, the duration of the surgery was longer. Postoperative imaging findings showed high screw accuracy in both groups, with a grade A rate of 95% in the robot-assisted group compared with 91.4% in the conventional open surgery group according to the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. Both groups achieved similar improvements in VAS and ODI during 1-year follow-up, and both groups achieved good bone graft fusion (97.5% fusion rate in the robot-assisted group versus 93.5% in the conventional open surgery group).

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted screw fixation combined with endoscopic bone graft provides a safe and reliable minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spondylolysis, with high accuracy of pedicle screw implantation and less radiation exposure dose, less intraoperative trauma, and quicker recovery than conventional open surgery.

Accuracy in navigated percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation of pelvic fragility fractures is increasingly being used to maintain mobility and reduce pain in the elderly patient population. Traditionally, this is performed using 2D fluoroscopy. Several newer, navigated techniques have emerged that may further facilitate this procedure. It, however, remains unclear whether there is a benefit regarding accuracy, radiation exposure and complications of these new navigation techniques when compared to the traditional 2D fluoroscopy.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. PubMed, CENTRAL and Embase were searched for both randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing new navigation techniques to 2D fluoroscopy for percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation. Effect estimates were pooled (random effects) and presented as odds ratio, mean difference and standardized mean difference with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

19 studies were included. The 2D fluoroscopy group had 642 patients and the new navigation group 663 patients. Accuracy was significantly higher in the new navigation group (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.53-3.90), especially O-Arm, 3D CT and Robotic navigation. On average, accuracy was 82% in the 2D group and 92% in the new navigation group, which was significant. Also, fluoroscopy time (MD 71.89 s, 95% CI 51.37-92.41) and frequency (MD 17.22 images in total, 95% CI 7.73-26.70) were significantly reduced in the new navigation group. Complications are acceptably low, however, poorly reported in both groups.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated a higher accuracy, lower fluoroscopic frequency and time for new navigation techniques compared to 2D fluoroscopy. More advanced navigation techniques, such as 3D CT and robotic navigation, appeared to be even better.

Robotic Spine Surgery: Systematic Review of Common Error Types and Best Practices

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Robotic systems have emerged as a significant advancement in the field of spine surgery. They offer improved accuracy in pedicle screw placement and reduce intraoperative complications, hospital length of stay, blood loss, and radiation exposure. As the use of robotics in spine surgery continues to grow, it becomes imperative to understand common errors and challenges associated with this new and promising technology. Although the reported accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement is very high, the current literature does not capture near misses or incidental procedural errors that might have been managed during surgery or did not alter treatment of patients. We evaluated errors that occur during robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion and identify best practices to minimize their occurrence.

METHODS

In this systematic review, we characterized 3 types of errors encountered during robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion-registration errors, skiving, and interference errors-that have been reported in the literature.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 13 relevant studies reporting robot-assisted screw errors. Nine studies reported registration errors, with 60% of failed screws in those studies caused by registration issues. Seven studies highlighted skiving errors; 26.8% of the failed screws in those studies were caused by skiving. Finally, interference errors were reported in 4 studies, making up 19.5% of failed screws.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of these findings, we suggest best practices-including close attention to preoperative planning, patient positioning, image registration, and equipment selection-to minimize the occurrence of these errors. Awareness of how errors occur may increase the safety of this technology.

Freehand Placement of a Transiliac-Transsacral Screw for Fixation of Posterior Pelvic Ring Injuries

OBJECTIVE

There are many advantages to stabilize the posterior pelvic ring injuries with a transiliac-transsacral (TITS) screw percutaneously. To identify the correct entry point and insert a guidewire accurately for a TITS screw, we propose a method of specifying the optimal entry point, and introduce a technique of enabling freehand placement of a guidewire with fluoroscopic guidance.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 116 patients who underwent pelvic CT scans and pelvic lateral radiographs at our institution from January 2020 to April 2022 were enrolled. The optimal entry point for a TITS screw was formulated in the strict mid-sagittal CT plane, and then transferred to the pelvic lateral radiograph relying on the sacral cortexes which were easily visible even in the poor fluoroscopy. The relative position of this point to other anatomical markers was checked to confirm its feasibility as an entry point. With the method to locate the entry point, 18 patients suffered the posterior pelvic ring injuries were treated with TITS screws through hammering a reverse Kirschner wire (K-wire) to insert a guidewire assisted by a canula, followed by the validation of the screw placement accuracy.

RESULTS

The transferred point in radiograph was consistently beneath the sacral alar slope, and located posteroinferior to the iliac cortical density (ICD) and anterosuperior to the sacral nerve root tunnel in all 116 patients. In clinical practice, 18 TITS screws were successfully placed in 18 patients without cortex violation. The average operative time for each screw was 20.11 ± 6.29 min, with an average of 14.11 ± 6.81 fluoroscopic shots per screw. At the 3-month follow-up, fracture healing was confirmed in all patients. The average Majeed score was 89.61 ± 6.90 at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

It's feasible to identify an entry point for a TITS screw based on the sacral cortexes, and hammering a reverse K-wire assisted by a percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) canula is a safe and practical technique for guidewire insertion.

Robot-assisted anterior odontoid screw for the treatment of type Ⅱ odontoid fractures: Safety and effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Anterior odontoid screw fixation is considered to be preferred surgical treatment for the type Ⅱ odontoid fractures. However, due to the high difficulty to insert odontoid screw with barehand, the high risk of screw misalignment and damage to surrounding important tissue structures, we urgently need robot-assisted screw insert navigation technology to improve the safety and accuracy of inserting odontoid screws.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 7 patients with type II odontoid fractures who underwent Tinavi robot-assisted screw insert technology from May 2018 to May 2019 at our hospital. All patients had received 64-row CT scans and 3D reconstructions completed preoperatively, and magnetic resonance (MRI) were performed to verify the severity of odontoid fractures, soft tissue injuries and vertebral artery height. Postoperative CT was repeated in 6 months after surgery to evaluate cervical stability and confirm whether the screw had breached the bone cortex, the accuracy of screw placement based on Rampersaud A-D grade. Functional recovery was assessed using the post-traumatic Mayor scoring system for the cervical spine.

RESULTS

All 7 patients successfully completed the robot-assisted operation without nerve and blood vessel damage. What is the operation time 103.3 min, intraoperative blood loss 11.1 ml. The angulation and displacement of the fracture were basically corrected by closed reduction during the operation. Postoperative CT of these 7 patients showed that the cervical spine was stable, the accuracy of "perfect" and "clinically acceptable" odontoid screw implantation was 100 % (7/7), none of the seven odontoid screws breached the bone cortex. Reexamination of X-rays showed that the fractures were all healed, and the average fracture healing time was average 13.7 weeks (12-15 weeks). During the follow-up period, 7 patients had no surgical complications, postoperative cervical spine trauma mayo score: excellent in 6 cases and good in 1 case.

CONCLUSION

Tinavi robot-assisted screw insert technology is a minimally invasive, accurate, safe and feasible method for the treatment of type Ⅱ odontoid fractures.

Preoperative 3D printing planning technology combined with orthopedic surgical robot-assisted minimally invasive screw fixation for the treatment of pelvic fractures: a retrospective study

Objective

To explore the advantages and effectiveness of preoperative 3D printing planning technology combined with orthopedic surgical robot-assisted screw placement in the minimally invasive treatment of pelvic fractures compared to orthopedic surgical robot-assisted screw placement alone.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 29 patients with unstable pelvic fractures treated with orthopedic surgical robot-assisted percutaneous screw fixation from July 2021 to August 2023 was conducted. Among them, 13 patients who underwent preoperative 3D printing technology for screw planning were assigned to the experimental group, and the remaining 16 patients were assigned to the control group. All patients underwent screw fixation alone or combined with other fixation methods for fracture fixation. The application of preoperative 3D printing planning in orthopedic surgical robot operations was described. The intraoperative screw drawing time, invasive operation time, number of fluoroscopies during invasive operation, postoperative evaluation of screw accuracy, fracture healing, complications, and functional outcomes were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results

All patients successfully underwent surgery, with one patient in the control group experiencing numbness in the sciatic nerve innervation area. All patients were followed up for 4-15 months, with an average of 8 months, and all fractures achieved healing. The experimental group had a total of 26 screws inserted, while the control group had 30 screws. In the experimental group, the intraoperative screw drawing time was 3.0 (3.0, 3.37) min, significantly shorter than 4.0 (3.6, 4.0) min in the control group (P < 0.05). The proportion of screws not penetrating the bone postoperatively was 88.5% in the experimental group, significantly higher than 63.3% in the control group (P < 0.05). In the experimental group, the postoperative screw position, compared to the planned screw position, had an average position deviation of 3.05 ± 0.673 mm and an average spatial angle deviation of 2.22 ± 0.605°. At the last follow-up, the Majeed score was used to assess function, with the experimental group having an excellent and good rate of 84.6%, slightly higher than 75.0% in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

In the treatment of pelvic fractures using screw fixation, preoperative 3D printing technology planning combined with orthopedic surgical robots, compared to orthopedic surgical robot-assisted screw placement alone, can significantly reduce intraoperative screw drawing time, decrease drawing difficulty, enhance screw placement accuracy, and does not increase invasive operation time or the number of fluoroscopies. This approach makes the surgery safer and is a method worth applying.

Navigation and 3D-imaging in pelvic ring surgery: a systematic review of prospective comparative studies

BACKGROUND

Few literature reviews have been published focusing on navigation, robotic or pre-operative planning using 3D-imaging technology (3D-printing, 3D-planning). To our knowledge, no reviews have been performed to assess and compare all these modalities together versus control groups (conventional fluoroscopy) through high Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) and Prospective Control Studies (PCSs). The aim of this study was to assess and compare 3D-imaging technologies from pre-operative planning to per-operative navigation and robotic in the management of pelvic ring fractures through high level studies.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed, the Cochrane library and Google scholar using keywords up to December 2023. Only prospective comparative studies (RCT and PCS) were included. A total of 341 articles were identified, 39 articles were selected for full-text analysis leaving 7 articles included in this literature systematic review.

RESULTS

A trend towards improved precision in screw placement and reduction of radiation exposure without consequences in term of functional outcomes have been identified. No conclusions can be extrapolated regarding operative time and blood loss except for robotic which improve these parameters because robotic arm assistance help surgeons to correctly follow the planning based on 2D-fluoroscopy. Surgery duration and radiation dose are significantly reduced with robotic-arm assistance for the same reasons. With navigation the results have to be nuanced according to the experience of the surgical team. Interest of navigation is emphasized in sacral dysmorphism in comparison with conventional fluoroscopy. This highlights the benefits of navigation for ilio-sacral screw placement in difficult cases and less experimented teams.

CONCLUSION

High level studies which assess and compare 3D-imaging technologies from pre-operative planning to per-operative navigation and robotic in the management of pelvic ring fractures are low. To date and according to the present high level literature, navigation and 3D-technologies in pelvic ring surgery should be recommended for difficult cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE, II

Systematic review of Level II studies.

Robotic Placement of 3 Trans-Sacral TransiIliac Screws Through a Single Corridor for U-Type Sacrum Fracture: A Case Report

CASE

We present a case of robot-assisted placement of 3 trans-sacral transiliac screws through a single corridor for an unstable U-type sacral fracture in a 95-year-old woman. She had persistent pain and inability to mobilize with physical therapy. At 3-month follow-up, the patient had evidence of interval healing and stable hardware and was able to return to her prior functional baseline.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate successful utilization of robotics to place 3 trans-sacral transiliac screws in a single corridor for fixation of an unstable pelvic ring injury. This technique was used to overcome challenges with visualization and implant placement.

Reducing residual forces in spinal fusion using a custom-built rod bending machine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

As part of spinal fusion surgery, shaping the rod implant to align with the anatomy is a tedious, error-prone, and time-consuming manual process. Inadequately contoured rod implants introduce stress on the screw-bone interface of the pedicle screws, potentially leading to screw loosening or even pull-out.

METHODS

We propose the first fully automated solution to the rod bending problem by leveraging the advantages of augmented reality and robotics. Augmented reality not only enables the surgeons to intraoperatively digitize the screw positions but also provides a human-computer interface to the wirelessly integrated custom-built rod bending machine. Furthermore, we introduce custom-built test rigs to quantify per screw absolute tensile/compressive residual forces on the screw-bone interface. Besides residual forces, we have evaluated the required bending times and reducer engagements, and compared our method to the freehand gold standard.

RESULTS

We achieved a significant reduction of the average absolute residual forces from for the freehand gold standard to (p=0.0015) using the bending machine. Moreover, our bending machine reduced the average time to instrumentation per screw from to . Reducer engagements per rod were significantly decreased from an average of 1.00±1.14 to 0.11±0.32 (p=0.0037).

CONCLUSION

The combination of augmented reality and robotics has the potential to improve surgical outcomes while minimizing the dependency on individual surgeon skill and dexterity.

TiRobot-Assisted Percutaneous Cannulated Screw Fixation for Elderly Patients with Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs) is increasing in the elderly population, and FFPs that require fixation are a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. The insertion of implants is not risk free due to the complex anatomical and osteoporotic bones and requires a steep learning curve. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of TiRobot-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation in the treatment of elderly FFP patients.

METHOD

The clinical data of 46 elderly FFP patients who had been treated with percutaneous cannulated screw fixation from May 2020 to September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-four patients were treated with percutaneous cannulated screw fixation assisted by the TiRobot (TiRobot-assisted group) and 22 patients were treated with conventional freehand surgery (freehand group). Postoperative outcomes, including Matta value, excellent and good rate (EGR) of fracture reduction, and accuracy of screw placement (ASP), were compared. Changes in the Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and the Majeed score were recorded and compared between groups before and after surgery and during the 24-week follow-up. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and effect sizes were used as analysis methods.

RESULTS

A total of 90 screws were implanted, 51 screws in the TiRobot-assisted group and 39 screws in the freehand group. The operation time of the two groups was 34.1 ± 2.67 min versus 64.5 ± 4.19 min (p < 0.001). There were no screw-related complications or revision surgeries in any group. The Matta value of the TiRobot-assisted group was 5.13 ± 3.52, which was significantly lower than that of the freehand group (9.00 ± 3.68, p < 0.001), while the EGR was 91.67% versus 72.73%, with statistical significance (p < 0.001). The ASP was 100% in the TiRobot-assisted group, better than that in the freehand group, where it was 85.7% (p = 0.043). At each timepoint in the early postoperative period, the VAS score of the TiRobot-assisted group was significantly lower than that of the freehand group and was close to consistent by the last follow-up; the Majeed score of the former was significantly higher than that of the latter at each timepoint of follow-up, with statistical significance (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

TiRobot-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of elderly FFP patients is advantageous over conventional freehand surgery, with less invasion, more accurate screw placement, better fracture reduction, early pain relief, and rapid recovery, suggesting that Freehand method to stabilize FFP in the elderly population.

Robot Navigation System Assisted PFNA Fixation of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly: A Retrospective Clinical Study

Objective

The incidence of hip fracture in the elderly is increasing. Robot navigation technology has the advantages of minimally invasive and accurate. To explore the difference between the clinical effects of proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail (PFNA) assisted by robot navigation in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture and traditional PFNA in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly; analyze the advantages and feasibility of PFNA assisted by robot navigation in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly.

Patients and Methods

From February 2021 to October 2022, the elderly (>65 years old) with femoral intertrochanteric fracture underwent surgery in our center. Divided the patients included in the study into 2 groups based on the surgical method. The surgical method of robot group was PFNA fixation assisted by robot navigation, while the surgical method of traditional group was classic PFNA fixation, Baseline data (general condition, Evans classification, time from injury to operation, preoperative hemoglobin) and observation indicators (intraoperative bleeding, operation time, the length of incision for mail nail insertion, postoperative hemoglobin drop, blood transfusion rate and the Harris score of hip joint 1 year after operation) of the two groups were collected to compare whether there were differences between the two groups.

Results

There was no statistical difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative bleeding in the robot group was 68.17±10.66 mL, the intraoperative bleeding in the traditional group was 174±8.11mL (P<0.001). The operation time in the robot group was 68.81 ± 6.89 min, in the traditional group, the operation time was 76.94 ± 8.18 min (P<0.001). The length of incision for mail nail insertion in the robot group was 3.53 ± 0.63 cm, the length of the incision for mail nail insertion in the traditional group was 4.23 ± 0.71 cm (P<0.001). 5 patients (13.9%) in the robot group received blood transfusion treatment, and 13 patients (36.1%) in the traditional group received blood transfusion treatment (P=0.029). The hemoglobin in the robot group decreased by 14.81 ± 3.27 g/l after operation compared with that before operation, while that in the traditional group decreased by 16.69 ± 3.32 g/l (P=0.018). The Harris score of the hip joint of the affected limb in the robot group was excellent in 25 cases, good in 8 cases and poor in 3 cases one year after the operation; In the traditional group, Harris scores were excellent in 18 cases, good in 11 cases and poor in 7 cases (P=0.021).

Conclusion

PFNA fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fracture with robot navigation assistance has the advantages of minimally invasive and accurate, shorter operation time, less bleeding and lower blood transfusion rate than traditional surgical methods, and has certain advantages in reducing postoperative complications of elderly patients.

Percutaneous Sacroiliac Screw Fixation: A Modified Screw Insertion Method Using Just 2 Fluoroscopy Views

Objectives

Percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation (PSSF) is a well-defined method of surgery to fix unstable fractures of the pelvic ring with fewer post-surgical complications. However, the complex anatomy of the mentioned area makes PSSF a formidable challenge. The present study aimed to investigate a modified screw insertion method using two views of fluoroscopy X-ray instead of the prior three views to reduce the duration of operations and radiation exposures.

Methods

The present study was performed on 10 radiopaque plastic pelvic models (including 20 half pelvis) during simulated surgical procedures. Of the 20 screws, 10 were inserted using the conventional method with the navigation of three fluoroscopy views (Group A). The remaining 10 were inserted using the modified method with the navigation of two fluoroscopy views, including just the outlet and inlet views, without taking the lateral view, based on our theory and order of fluoroscopy (Group B). Following screw insertion, the accuracy of screw locations was evaluated using a computed tomography (CT) scan, and the duration of operations and radiation exposures were compared between the two surgery methods at the end of the study.

Results

In both groups, nine screws (90%) were located correctly, and one screw (10%) perforated the anterior wall of the first sacral vertebra. The mean±SD of the duration of radiation exposure in groups A and B was 6.1±1.0 min and 4.2±0.1 min, respectively (P=0.01). Moreover, the mean±SD of operation duration in group A was 45.7±5.8 min, but this value in group B was 35.5±4.5, which showed a significant decrease in operation duration (P=0.04).).

Conclusion

PSSF using a modified screw insertion method with just two fluoroscopy views not only had similar accuracy to conventional methods but also could decrease operation time and the following radiation exposure.

Robotics and navigation in spine surgery: A narrative review

Introduction

In recent decades, there has been a rising trend of spinal surgical interventional techniques, especially Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (MIS), to improve the quality of life in an effective and safe manner. However, MIS techniques tend to be difficult to adapt and are associated with an increased risk of radiation exposure. This led to the development of 'computer-assisted surgery' in 1983, which integrated CT images into spinal procedures evolving into the present day robotic-assisted spine surgery. The authors aim to review the development of spine surgeries and provide an overview of the benefits offered. It includes all the comparative studies available to date.

Methods

The manuscript has been prepared as per "SANRA-a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles". The authors searched Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus using the terms "(((((Robotics) OR (Navigation)) OR (computer assisted)) OR (3D navigation)) OR (Freehand)) OR (O-Arm)) AND (spine surgery)" and 68 articles were included for analysis excluding review articles, meta-analyses, or systematic literature.

Results

The authors noted that 49 out of 68 studies showed increased precision of pedicle screw insertion, 10 out of 19 studies show decreased radiation exposure, 13 studies noted decreased operative time, 4 out of 8 studies showed reduced hospital stay and significant reduction in rates of infections, neurological deficits, the need for revision surgeries, and rates of radiological ASD, with computer-assisted techniques.

Conclusion

Computer-assisted surgeries have better accuracy of pedicle screw insertion, decreased blood loss and operative time, reduced radiation exposure, improved functional outcomes, and lesser complications.

Robotic-assisted systems for the safe and reliable treatment of femoral neck fractures: retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Robots are being used in a wide range of surgical procedures. However, in clinical practice, the efficacy of orthopedic robotic-assisted treatment of femoral neck fractures is still poorly reported, particularly in terms of screw placement accuracy, femoral neck fracture healing rates and postoperative functional recovery. Moreover, there is a lack of comparative analysis between robot-assisted surgery and traditional surgical approaches.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with femoral neck fractures treated with TiRobot-assisted hollow screw fixation with those of patients with femoral neck fractures treated with traditional surgical approaches.

METHODS

This study included 112 patients with femoral neck fracture who were treated from March 2017 to October 2021 with percutaneous hollow screw internal fixation. These included 56 cases in the TiRobot-assisted surgery group and 56 cases in the standard surgery group. After at least 1 year of follow-up, the treatment outcomes of the two groups were compared, including the amount of intraoperative bleeding, the duration of intraoperative fluoroscopy, the number of guide pin positioning adjustments, the length of hospital stay, the accuracy rate of screw placement, the final Harris Hip Score, the fracture healing rate, and the rate of femoral head necrosis. Statistical analysis software was used to process and analyze the result.

RESULTS

The TiRobot-assisted group had a statistically significant improvement over the control group in terms of intraoperative bleeding, the duration of intraoperative fluoroscopy, the number of guide pin positioning adjustments, length of hospital stay, accuracy of screw placement and incidence of femoral head necrosis (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in time to surgery, final Harris hip score and fracture healing rate (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that TiRobot-assisted surgery has the advantages of short hospital stay, high safety, minimally invasive, high success rate of nail placement, and can reduce the amount of intraoperative radiation and the incidence of femoral head necrosis, thus achieving satisfactory clinical outcomes, and is worthy of clinical promotion.

Robot-assisted vs traditional percutaneous freehand for the scaphoid fracture treatment: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficiency, safety, and accuracy of cannulated screw fixation using a robot-assisted method compared with a traditional percutaneous freehand method.

METHODS

This retrospective clinical study included 18 patients with scaphoid fracture who underwent cannulated screw fixation by robot-assisted technique or traditional percutaneous freehand technique from June 2018 to June 2020. All patients were divided into the robot-assisted group (9 patients) or the traditional surgery group (9 patients). The operation time, blood loss, number of intra-operative fluoroscopies, fracture healing time, Mayo wrist function score, and screw implantation accuracy were recorded in the two groups.

RESULTS

The average age of the robot-assisted group was 37.9 ± 10.6 years (with a range of 30 to 52 years), there were eight males and one female, and there were six cases of scaphoid fracture on the right side and three on the left side. The average pre-operative time was 2.8 ± 0.7 days (ranging from 1 to 3 days). The average age of the traditional surgery group was 31.6 ± 6.8 years (with a range of 20 to 45 years), there were eight males and one female, and there were five cases of scaphoid fracture on the right side and four on the left side. The average pre-operative time was 2.1 ± 0.8 days (with a range of 2 to 4 days). The number of intra-operative fluoroscopies was 24.4 ± 3.5 in the traditional surgery group, whereas it was only 10.1 ± 1.9 in the robot-assisted group, which was significantly lower (P < 0.05). The average operation time of the traditional operation group was 48.4 ± 12.2 min, and that of the robot-assisted group was 32.6 ± 4.2 minutes, which was significantly shorter (P < 0.05). The angles between the actual screw position and the central axis of the scaphoid on both the coronal and sagittal post-operative CT images were 8.3° ± 2.3° and 8.8° ± 1.6° for the traditional operation group and 3.8° ± 0.8° and 4.3° ± 1.2° for the robot-assisted group, so the accuracy of the robot-assisted group was significantly higher (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in wrist function recovery or fracture healing time.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted treatment of scaphoid fracture is more accurate than traditional freehand technology, with shorter operation time and fewer intra-operative fluoroscopies. There is no difference between the two surgical techniques in intra-operative bleeding, post-operative fracture healing, or functional recovery. Robot-assisted surgery is a safe, effective, and accurate method for treating scaphoid fracture.

Robotics in spine surgery: systematic review of literature

PURPOSE

Over 4.83 million spine surgery procedures are performed annually around the world. With the considerable caseload and the precision needed to achieve optimal spinal instrumentation, technical progress has helped to improve the technique's safety and accuracy with the development of peri-operative assistance tools. Contrary to other surgical applications already part of the standard of care, the development of robotics in spine surgery is still a novelty and is not widely available nor used. Robotics, especially when coupled with other guidance modalities such as navigation, seems to be a promising tool in our quest for accuracy, improving patient outcomes and reducing surgical complications. Robotics in spine surgery may also be for the surgeon a way to progress in terms of ergonomics, but also to respond to a growing concern among surgical teams to reduce radiation exposure.

METHOD

We present in this recent systematic review of the literature realized according to the PRISMA guidelines the place of robotics in spine surgery, reviewing the comparison to standard techniques, the current and future indications, the learning curve, the impact on radiation exposure, and the cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

Seventy-six relevant original studies were identified and analyzed for the review.

CONCLUSION

Robotics has proved to be a safe help for spine surgery, both for the patient with a decrease of operating time and increase in pedicular screw accuracy, and for the surgical team with a decrease of radiation exposure. Medico-economic studies demonstrated that despite a high buying cost, the purchase of a robot dedicated for spine surgery is cost-effective resulting in lesser revision, lower infection, reduced length of stay, and shorter surgical procedure.

Robot-assisted all-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

To review a series of adolescent patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries surgically treated with robot-assisted all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction (ACLR), and to compare with the traditional freehand group.

METHODS

This retrospective clinical study included 16 patients with ACL injuries who underwent ACLR by robot-assisted technique or traditional freehand method from June 2018 to March 2020. All patients were divided into the robot-assisted group (6 patients) or the traditional surgery group (10 patients). The number of intra-operative fluoroscopies, operation time, accuracy of bone tunnel insertions, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score and ligament laxity testing were recorded in the two groups.

RESULTS

All patients returned for follow-up, at a mean of 31.6 ± 4.5 months after surgery. The average age of the robot-assisted group was 12.2 ± 1.3 years. The number of intra-operative fluoroscopies was 10.9 ± 2.8 in the traditional freehand group, whereas it was only 3.0 ± 0.6 in the robot-assisted group, which was significantly lower (P < 0.05). The operative time in the robot-assisted group was shorter than that in the traditional freehand group (87 ± 10.7 min vs. 126 ± 12.1 min, P < 0.05). The distance between the center of actual insertion and the center of the idea insertion on both femoral and tibial intra-articular bone tunnel were 1.5 ± 0.3 mm and 1.6 ± 0.3 mm for the robot-assisted group and 2.7 mm ± 0.4 mm and 2.4 ± 0.4 mm for the traditional freehand group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in function recovery at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

All-epiphyseal ACLR is a technically demanding procedure with a small margin of error. Robot-assisted treatment of ACL injuries in skeletally immature patients is more accurate than traditional freehand method, with shorter operation time and fewer intra-operative fluoroscopies.

Sacroiliac screws fixation navigated with three-dimensional printing personalized guide template for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury: A case report

Objective

Pelvic injuries refer to the disruption of the inherent structural and mechanical integrity of the pelvic ring. Sacroiliac screw fixation technique is often used for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury, which is prone to the iatrogenic injury. Various attempts were proposed to avoid iatrogenic injuries, while the executing processes are usually too cumbersome. The patient-personalized guide template based on 3D printing technology has been considered as a promising method, which can achieve lower deviation and higher accuracy in a simple and convenient way. We reported the first case of posterior pelvic ring injury using 3D printing personalized guide template with the verification of intraoperative CT.

Methods

The subject was a 74-year-old female with posterior pelvic ring injury. Two patient-specific guide templates were customized based on 3D printing technology, one for S1 and the other for S2. We used the guide templates for navigation to place the sacroiliac screws. The placement of screws was verified by intraoperative CT. Intraoperative and postoperative variables were collected.

Results

The technique helped us successfully insert the sacroiliac screws into the safe zone. The intraoperative blood loss was 23.03 ml, and the duration of operation was 62 min. The exposure dose during CT scanning was 7.025 mSv. The assessment of screws position was excellent. Furthermore, there was no sign of any functional impairment postoperatively.

Conclusion

Sacroiliac screws fixation with the assistance of 3D printing personalized guide template under the verification of intraoperative CT may be a promising method to treat posterior pelvic ring injuries.

Robot-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Robot-assisted pelvic screw fixation is a new technology with promising benefits on intraoperative outcomes for patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries. We aim to compare robot-assisted pelvic screw fixation to the traditional fluoroscopy-assisted technique with regards to intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used along with a search of electronic information to identify all studies comparing the outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional screw fixation in patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries. Primary outcomes included operative duration (minutes), intraoperative bleeding (mL), fluoroscopy exposure and intraoperative drilling frequency. Secondary outcome measures included Majeed score, healing time (minutes) and rate (%), postoperative complications, screw positioning, incision length (cm) and guide wire insertion times (minutes). The random effects model was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Four observational studies including a total of 294 patients were identified. There was a significant difference between robot-assisted and conventional groups in terms of operative duration (MD = - 24.66, p < 0.05), intraoperative bleeding (MD = - 10.37, P < 0.05), fluoroscopy exposure (MD = - 2.15, P < 0.05) and intraoperative drilling frequency (MD = - 2.42, P =  < 0.05). For secondary outcomes, no significant difference was seen in Majeed score, healing time and rate and postoperative complications. The robot-assisted group had better screw positioning, smaller incision length, and shorter anaesthesia and guide wire insertion times.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted fixation has superior intraoperative outcomes compared to conventional fixation. Further studies are needed to look at postoperative outcomes as there is no significant difference in postoperative prognosis between the techniques.

Spinal robotics in cervical spine surgery: a systematic review with key concepts and technical considerations

OBJECTIVE

Spinal robotics for thoracolumbar procedures, predominantly employed for the insertion of pedicle screws, is currently an emerging topic in the literature. The use of robotics in instrumentation of the cervical spine has not been broadly explored. In this review, the authors aimed to coherently synthesize the existing literature of intraoperative robotic use in the cervical spine and explore considerations for future directions and developments in cervical spinal robotics.

METHODS

A literature search in the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases was performed for the purpose of retrieving all articles reporting on cervical spine surgery with the use of robotics. For the purposes of this study, randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials, retrospective case series, and individual case reports were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was utilized to assess risk of bias of the studies included in the review. To present and synthesize results, data were extracted from the included articles and analyzed using the PyMARE library for effect-size meta-analysis.

RESULTS

On careful review, 6 articles published between 2016 and 2022 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, including 1 randomized controlled trial, 1 nonrandomized controlled trial, 2 case series, and 2 case reports. These studies featured a total of 110 patients meeting the inclusion criteria (mean age 53.9 years, range 29-77 years; 64.5% males). A total of 482 cervical screws were placed with the use of a surgical robot, which yielded an average screw deviation of 0.95 mm. Cervical pedicle screws were the primary screw type used, at a rate of 78.6%. According to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification, 97.7% of screws in this review achieved a clinically acceptable grade. The average duration of surgery, blood loss, and postoperative length of stay were all decreased in minimally invasive robotic surgery relative to open procedures. Only 1 (0.9%) postoperative complication was reported, which was a surgical site infection, and the mean length of follow-up was 2.7 months. No mortality was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted cervical screw placement is associated with acceptable rates of clinical grading, operative time, blood loss, and postoperative complications-all of which are equal to or improved relative to the metrics seen in the conventional use of fluoroscopy or computer-assisted navigation for cervical screw placement.

Comparative retrospective study of triangular osteosynthesis with and without robotic assistance for unilateral unstable sacral fractures combined with lumbosacral junction injuries

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical efficacy of unilateral unstable sacral fractures (USFs) involving the lumbosacral region treated with and without robot-aided triangular osteosynthesis (TOS).

METHODS

Patients of the unilateral USF combined with the ipsilateral lumbosacral junction injury (LSJI) treated with TOS were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups: the robot group (TOS with robotic assistance) and the conventional group (TOS with open procedure). Screw placement was assessed using the modified Gras criterion. Patients were followed up with routine visits for clinical and radiographic examinations. At the final follow-up, clinical outcomes were recorded and scored using the Majeed scoring system.

RESULTS

Eleven patients in the robot group and seventeen patients in the conventional group were recruited into this study. Significant differences in surgical bleeding (P < 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (P = 0.002) were noted between the two groups. Operation time (P = 0.027) and fracture healing time (P = 0.041) was shorter in the robot group. There was no difference in postoperative residual displacement between the two groups (P = 0.971). According to the modified Gras criterion, the percentages of grade I for sacroiliac screws in the two groups were 90.9% (10/11) and 70.6% (12/17), and for pedicle screws were 100% (11/11) and 100% (17/17), respectively. The rate of incision-related complications was 0% (0/11) in the robot group and 11.8% (2/17) in the conventional group. Statistical differences were shown on the Majeed criterion (P = 0.039), with higher scores in the robot group.

CONCLUSION

TOS with robotic assistance for the treatment of unilateral USFs combined with ipsilateral LSJIs is safe and feasible, with the advantages of less radiation exposure and fewer incision-related complications.

TiRobot‑assisted versus conventional fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for pelvic ring injuries: a meta‑analysis

BACKGROUND

The TiRobot is the only robot that has been reported in the literature for posterior pelvic injuries. We aim to compare TiRobot-assisted pelvic screw fixation with the conventional fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis to identify studies involving TiRobot‑assisted versus conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for pelvic ring injuries in electronic databases, including Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Library, Highwire, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang database, up to April 2022. The following keywords were used: "TiRobot," "robot," "robotic," "pelvic fracture," "screw fixation," "percutaneous," and "pelvic ring injury." Pooled effects of this meta-analysis were calculated using STATA SE version 15.0.

RESULTS

Compared with conventional fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation, TiRobot will result in less radiation exposure time of screw implantation (P = 0.000), less frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy (P = 0.000), fewer guide wire attempts (P = 0.000), less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.005), better screw accuracy (P = 0.011), better Majeed score (P = 0.031), and higher overall excellent and good rates of Majeed score (P = 0.018). However, there were no significant differences in terms of operative time (P = 0.055), fracture healing time (P = 0.365), and overall excellent and good rate of reduction accuracy (P = 0.426) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

TiRobot-assisted fixation has less intraoperative fluoroscopy and intraoperative blood loss, superior screw accuracy, and Majeed score compared with conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation. TiRobot has no significant effect on operative time, fracture healing time, and reduction accuracy. Given the relevant possible biases in our meta-analysis, we required more adequately powered and better-designed RCT studies with long-term follow-up to reach a firmer conclusion.

A Comparison Between Robotic-Assisted Scaphoid Screw Fixation and a Freehand Technique for Acute Scaphoid Fracture: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

We compared robotic-assisted scaphoid screw fixation to conventional technique in terms of accuracy, surgical times, radiation exposure, and clinical outcomes, including range of motion, grip strength, functional score, and complications.

METHODS

This study was a registered, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. From May 2019 to December 2019, 1 surgeon performed 18 robotic-assisted and 18 conventional scaphoid screw fixations and these patients were eligible for participation in this study. Surgical time, including the time of the overall procedure, set-up time, and time for ideal guidewire placement, was recorded. The number of guidewire attempts also was recorded. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at follow-up with respect to the severity of pain, wrist motion, grip strength, complications, and Mayo modified wrist score.

RESULTS

The average set-up time and overall time of the procedure were longer in the robotic-assisted than in the conventional groups, while the mean guidewire insertion time and the mean guidewire attempts was less in the robotic-assisted group than that of the conventional group. The overall radiation exposure was lower in the robotic group.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted technique provided a useful tool to improve implantation accuracy and shorten radiation exposure. Additional cost and prolonged duration of surgery without evidence of improved clinical scores may limit widespread acceptance of this technique.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

The design and application of an individualized 3D printing assisted guide plates in assisting sacroiliac screws insertion

OBJECTIVE

Currently, the sacroiliac screws insertion still faces several challenges in the fixation of pelvic and acetabular injuries. This study was aimed to design a personalized three-dimensional (3D) printing assisted guide plates to assist sacroiliac screws insertion, so as to provide a reference for further clinical applications.

METHODS

Eight pelvic specimens (5 males and 3 females) of normal adults were used to simulate actual operation. After thin-layer CT scanning, the 3D models of pelvis were established based on the images data. Furthermore, in Mimics 17.0 software, the screw entry points and screw channels of sacroiliac screws were further simulated and designed, and the appropriate range of the posterior superior iliac spine was selected to establish and print the virtual guide plates. Then, the simulated screws insertion was performed in vitro, the pelvic specimens after screws insertion were scanned again by CT, and the effect of screws insertion was further evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 16 sacroiliac screw guide plates were designed and printed, and 48 screws were inserted on both sides. Therein, 45 screws were completely located in the sacral vertebra, which was determined as grade 0, with an accuracy rate of 93.2%. The other 3 screws penetrated the anterior cortex or sacral canal of sacral vertebra, including 2 screws in Grade 1 (4.1%) and 1 screw in Grade 2 (2.1%). Compared with the simulated screw channels, the anterior and posterior offset angles of the cross section were (0.912 ± 0.625) ° and (0.802 ± 0.681) ° respectively, with no significant difference (p > 0.05). The upper and lower offset angles of coronal plane were (1.158 ± 0.823) ° and (1.034 ± 0.908) ° respectively, and there was no significant difference (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

3 D printing guide plates assisted sacroiliac screws insertion can enhance the stability of pelvic posterior ring fixation and assist surgeons to reduce the difficulty of operation.

Finite Element Analysis and Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation for Posterior Pelvic Ring with Sacrum Dysplasia

OBJECTIVE

Posterior pelvic ring sacroiliac screws are preferred by clinicians for their good biomechanical performance. However, there are few studies on mechanical analysis and intraoperative screw insertion of the dysplastic sacrum and sacroiliac screw. This study investigated the biomechanical performance of oblique sacroiliac screws (OSS) in S1 combined with transiliac-transsacral screws (TTSs) in S2 for pelvic fracture or sacroiliac dislocation with dysplastic sacrum and evaluated the safety of screw placement assisted by the navigation template.

METHODS

Six models were established, including one OSS fixation in the S2 segment, one transverse sacroiliac screw (TSS) fixation in the S2 segment, one TTS fixation in the S2 segment, one OSS fixation in the S1 and S2 segments, one OSS fixation in the S1 segment and one TSS fixation in the S2 segment, one OSS fixation in the S1 segment and one TTS fixation in the S2 segment. Then, finite element analysis (FEA) was performed. Twelve dysplastic sacrum patients with pelvis fracture or sacroiliac dislocation underwent OSS insertion in the S1 combined with TTS insertion in the S2 under the assistance of the patient-specific locked navigation template. Grading and Matta scores were evaluated after surgery.

RESULTS

In the one-screw fixation group, the vertical displacements of the sacrum surface of S2 OSS, S2 TSS and S2 TTS were 1.23, 1.42, and 1.22 mm, respectively, and the maximum stress of screw were 139.45 MPa, 144.81 MPa, 126.14 MPa, respectively. In the two-screw fixation group, the vertical displacements of the sacrum surface of the S1 OSS + S2 OSS, S1 OSS + S2 TSS and S1 OSS + S2 TTS were 0.91, 1.06, and 0.75 mm, respectively, and the maximum stress of screw were 149.26 MPa, 167.13 Pa, 136.76 MPa, respectively. Clinically, a total of 12 TTS and OSS were inserted under the assistance of navigation templates, with a surgical time of 55 ± 7.69 min, bleeding of 57.5 ± 18.15 ml and radiation times of 14.5 ± 4.95. One of the TTS and one of the OSS were grade 1, and the other screws were grade 0. The Matta scores of nine patients were excellent, and three patents were good.

CONCLUSION

OSS in the S1 combined with TTS in the S2 had the best mechanical stability in six models, and it is safe for screw insertion assisted by the patient-specific locked navigation template.

Current status of robot-assisted surgery in the clinical application of trauma orthopedics in China: A systematic review

Background and Aims

To elaborate on the development and characteristics of trauma orthopedic robots and their real curative effect in a clinical application through the collection and analysis of relevant literature and reported clinical results.

Method

We conducted the Embase, ScienceDirect, Pubmed, Medline, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP search of the literature on robotic-assisted surgery in trauma orthopedics in China. We combined search terms with "robotic surgery/artificial intelligence surgery/navigation surgery," "trauma/trauma orthopedics," and "China/Chinese." The exclusion criteria were: (1) articles in languages other than English or Chinese, (2) articles focused on other topics other than robotic-assisted surgery in trauma orthopedics of China, (3) article types were not clinical studies (reviews, basic research, etc.), and (4) articles were not included in the Chinese core journals or science citation index. Authors, type of surgery, robot type, and clinical research results were recorded and analyzed.

Results

There were three categories of surgical robots in the clinical application of trauma orthopedics (TiRobot, electromagnetic navigation surgical robots, and small medical robots developed by Beijing Jishuitan Hospital). In terms of blood loss, the fluoroscopy time, and fluoroscopy frequency, most studies found that the robot group was significantly better than the traditional group.

Conclusions

Robot-assisted surgery has obvious advantages in accuracy, stability, and reducing intraoperative radiation exposure, but there is no final conclusion about functional recovery.

Comparison of the Accuracy and Safety of TiRobot-Assisted and Fluoroscopy-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Studies have compared the safety and accuracy of robot-assisted techniques for inserting conventional open pedicle screws for spinal surgery. However, no relevant studies have confirmed that robot-assisted percutaneous screw placement is better than fluoroscopic percutaneous screw placement for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. This study compared the accuracy and safety of TiRobot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement with those of the fluoroscopy-assisted percutaneous technique for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 126 patients with thoracolumbar fractures who underwent percutaneous pedicle screw placement. Sixty-five patients were treated with the TiRobot-assisted technique and 61 patients were treated with the fluoroscopy-assisted technique. Patient demographics, accuracy of screw placement (according to the Gertzbein and Robbins scale of grades A to E), screw insertion angle, radiation exposure, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, incision length, hospital expenses, surgical site infection, and neurological injury of the TiRobot-assisted and fluoroscopy-assisted groups were compared using Student's t-test, Pearson χ² test, or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 729 screws were placed (TiRobot-assisted group: 374 screws; fluoroscopy-assisted group: 355 screws). In the TiRobot-assisted group, 82.8% of screws were optimally positioned (grade A); however, the placement grades of the remaining screws were categorized as grade B (13.3%), grade C (3.2%), and grade D (0.5%). In the fluoroscopy-assisted group, 66.7% of the screws were optimally positioned (grade A); however, the placement grades of the remaining screws were categorized as grade B (21.4%), grade C (7.6%), grade D (3.6%), and grade E (0.5%). The proportion of clinically acceptable screws (grade A or B) was greater in the TiRobot-assisted group than in the fluoroscopy-assisted group. Additionally, the TiRobot-assisted group had a significantly larger mean screw insertion angle (22.27° ± 5.48° vs 20.55° ± 5.15°), larger incision length (13.86 ± 1.24 cm vs 12.77 ± 1.43 cm), and higher hospital expenses (69061.55 ± 7166.60 yuan vs 59383.85 ± 5019.64 yuan) than the fluoroscopy-assisted group. There were no significant differences in the intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and rates of surgical site infection and neurological injury in both groups (p > 0.05). However, the TiRobot-assisted group had significantly better surgical times, radiation times, and radiation exposure than the fluoroscopy-assisted group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous TiRobot-assisted pedicle screw placement is a safe, useful, and potentially more accurate alternative to the percutaneous fluoroscopy-assisted technique for treating thoracolumbar fractures.

[Orthopedic robot based on 5G technology for remote navigation of percutaneous screw fixation in pelvic and acetabular fractures]

Objective

To investigate the accuracy and safety of percutaneous screw fixation for pelvic and acetabular fractures with remote navigation of orthopedic robot based on 5G technology.

Methods

Between January 2021 and December 2021, 15 patients with pelvic and/or acetabular fractures were treated with percutaneous screws fixation which were placed by remote navigation of orthopedic robot based on 5G technology. There were 8 males and 7 females. The age ranged from 20 to 98 years, with an average of 52.1 years. The causes of trauma included traffic accident injury in 6 cases, falling from height injury in 6 cases, fall injury in 2 cases, and heavy object smashing injury in 1 case. The time from injury to operation ranged from 3 to 32 days, with an average of 10.9 days. There were 8 cases of simple pelvic fractures, 2 simple acetabular fractures, and 5 both pelvic and acetabular fractures. There were 7 cases of pelvic fractures of Tile type B2, 2 type B3, 1 type C1, and 3 type C2; 4 cases of unilateral anterior column fracture of the acetabulum, 2 bilateral anterior column fractures, and 1 anterior wall fracture. CT images within 5 days after operation were collected for screw position assessment. The screw planning time and guidewire placement time were recorded, as well as the presence of intraoperative adverse events and complications within 5 days after operation.

Results

All patients achieved satisfactory surgical results. A total of 36 percutaneous screws were inserted (20 sacroiliac screws, 6 LC Ⅱ screws, 9 anterior column screws, and 1 acetabular apical screw). In terms of screw position evaluation, 32 screws (88.89%) were excellent and 4 screws (11.11%) were good; there was no screw penetrating cortical bone. The screw planning time ranged from 4 to 15 minutes, with an average of 8.7 minutes. The guidewire placement time ranged from 3 to 10 minutes, with an average of 6.8 minutes. The communication delayed in 2 cases, but the operation progress was not affected, and no serious intraoperative adverse events occurred. No delayed vascular or nerve injury, infection, or other complications occurred within 5 days after operation. No cases need surgical revision.

Conclusion

The fixation of pelvic and acetabular fractures by percutaneous screw with remote navigation of orthopedic robot based on 5G technology is accurate, safe, and reliable.

[Development and clinical application of robot-assisted technology in traumatic orthopedics]

OBJECTIVE

To review and evaluate the basic principles and advantages of orthopedic robot-assisted technology, research progress, clinical applications, and limitations in the field of traumatic orthopedics, especially in fracture reduction robots.

METHODS

An extensive review of research literature on the principles of robot-assisted technology and fracture reduction robots was conducted to analyze the technical advantages and clinical efficacy and shortcomings, and to discuss the future development trends in this field.

RESULTS

Orthopedic surgical robots can assist orthopedists in intuitive preoperative planning, precise intraoperative control, and minimally invasive operations. It greatly expands the ability of doctors to evaluate and treat orthopedic trauma. Trauma orthopedic surgery robot has achieved a breakthrough from basic research to clinical application, and the preliminary results show that the technology can significantly improve surgical precision and reduce surgical trauma. However, there are still problems such as insufficient evaluation of effectiveness, limited means of technology realization, and narrow clinical indications that need to be solved.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted technology has a broad application prospect in traumatic orthopedics, but the current development is still in the initial stage. It is necessary to strengthen the cooperative medical-industrial research, the construction of doctors' communication platform, standardized training and data sharing in order to continuously promote the development of robot-assisted technology in traumatic orthopedics and better play its clinical application value.

Robotic Spine Surgery: Past, Present, and Future

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to present an overview of robotic spine surgery (RSS) including its history, applications, limitations, and future directions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The first RSS platform received United States Food and Drug Administration approval in 2004. Since then, robotic-assisted placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws has been extensively studied. More recently, expanded applications of RSS have been introduced and evaluated.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Cochrane, OVID-MEDLINE, and PubMed databases was performed for articles relevant to robotic spine surgery. Institutional review board approval was not needed.

RESULTS

The placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws using RSS is safe and accurate and results in reduced radiation exposure for the surgeon and surgical team. Barriers to utilization exist including learning curve and large capital costs. Additional applications involving minimally invasive techniques, cervical pedicle screws, and deformity correction have emerged.

CONCLUSION

Interest in RSS continues to grow as the applications advance in parallel with image guidance systems and minimally invasive techniques.

IRB APPROVAL

N/A.

Association of robot-assisted techniques with the accuracy rates of pedicle screw placement: A network pooling analysis

BACKGROUND

Traditional paired meta-analyses have yielded inconsistent results for the safety and effectiveness of robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement due to the high heterogeneity within studies. This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement.

METHODS

The Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched with no language limitations from inception to Jan 4, 2022. Odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to report results. The main outcomes were accuracy of pedicle screw placement, proximal facet joint violation, and complications. The study protocol was published in PROSPERO (CRD42022301417).

FINDINGS

26 trials including 2046 participants evaluating robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement were included in this study. Our pooled results showed that Renaissance (OR 2.86; [95% CI 1.79 to 4.57]) and TiRobot (OR 3.10; [95% CI 2.19 to 4.40]) yielded higher rates of perfect pedicle screw insertion (Grades A) than the conventional freehand technique. Renaissance (OR 2.82; [95% CI 1.51 to 5.25]) and TiRobot (OR 4.58; [95% CI 2.65 to 7.89]) yielded higher rates of clinically acceptable pedicle screw insertion (Grades A+B). However, ROSA, SpineAssist, and Orthobot were not associated with higher perfect pedicle screw insertion and clinically acceptable pedicle screw insertion rates. Robot-assisted techniques were associated with low rates of proximal facet joint violation (OR 0.18; [95% CI 0.10 to 0.32]; I²:9.55%) and overall complications (OR 0.38; [95% CI 0.23 to 0.63]; I²:27.05%). Moreover, robot-assisted techniques were associated with lower radiation doses (MD -14.38; [95% CI -25.62 to -3.13]; I²:100.00%).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest that only Renaissance and TiRobot systems are associated with high accuracy rates of pedicle screw placement. Robotic-assisted techniques hold great promise in spinal surgery due to their safety and effectiveness.

FUNDING

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81871818), Tangdu Hospital Seed Talent Program (Fei-Long Wei) and Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (No.2019JM-265).

Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Freehand Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Screw Fixation in Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Robotic-assisted navigation for percutaneous femoral neck fracture fixation is a new technology that has shown enhanced intraoperative and postoperative outcomes compared to the conventional freehand fluoroscopy-guided technique. The authors aim to compare robot-assisted femoral neck fracture fixation to conventional freehand fluoroscopy-guided repair. Electronic databases were searched, identifying all observational studies comparing outcomes of both groups. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. The primary outcomes included operative duration (minutes), intraoperative bleeding (mL), fluoroscopy exposure, and frequency of intraoperative drilling. The secondary outcomes included Harris scores, healing rate and time, screw accuracy, and postoperative complications. Seven observational studies were identified, enrolling 506 patients. There was a significant difference between the robot-assisted and conventional groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss (mean difference (MD) = -18.83, p ≤ 0.05), fluoroscopy exposure (MD = -1.81, p ≤ 0.05), and intraoperative drilling frequency (MD = -7.35, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in operative duration between the groups (MD = -0.21, p = 0.66). Most secondary outcomes were improved in the robot-assisted group. Overall, robot-assisted fixation was superior in terms of safety and efficacy.

Comparative Analysis of Optoelectronic Accuracy in the Laboratory Setting Versus Clinical Operative Environment: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

The optoelectronic camera source and data interpolation process serve as the foundation for navigational integrity in robotic-assisted surgical platforms. The current systematic review serves to provide a basis for the numerical disparity observed when comparing the intrinsic accuracy of optoelectronic cameras versus accuracy in the laboratory setting and clinical operative environments.

METHODS

Review of the PubMed and Cochrane Library research databases was performed. The exhaustive literature compilation obtained was then vetted to reduce redundancies and categorized into topics of intrinsic accuracy, registration accuracy, musculoskeletal kinematic platforms, and clinical operative platforms.

RESULTS

A total of 465 references were vetted and 137 comprise the basis for the current analysis. Regardless of application, the common denominators affecting overall optoelectronic accuracy are intrinsic accuracy, registration accuracy, and application accuracy. Intrinsic accuracy equaled or was less than 0.1 mm translation and 0.1 degrees rotation per fiducial. Controlled laboratory platforms reported 0.1 to 0.5 mm translation and 0.1 to 1.0 degrees rotation per array. Accuracy in robotic-assisted spinal surgery reported 1.5 to 6.0 mm translation and 1.5 to 5.0 degrees rotation when comparing planned to final implant position.

CONCLUSIONS

Navigational integrity and maintenance of fidelity of optoelectronic data is the cornerstone of robotic-assisted spinal surgery. Transitioning from controlled laboratory to clinical operative environments requires an increased number of steps in the optoelectronic kinematic chain and error potential. Diligence in planning, fiducial positioning, system registration and intra-operative workflow have the potential to improve accuracy and decrease disparity between planned and final implant position.

Robot-Assisted Autonomous Reduction of a Displaced Pelvic Fracture: A Case Report and Brief Literature Review

Displaced pelvic fracture is among the most complicated fractures in traumatic orthopedics, with high mortality and morbidity. Reduction is considered a complex procedure as well as a key part in surgical treatment. However, few robotic techniques have been employed in the reduction of pelvic fracture, despite the rapid advancement of technologies. Recently, we designed a robot surgery system specialized in the autonomous reduction of displaced pelvic fracture and applied it in the true patient for the first time. In this paper, we report its successful clinical debut in the surgery of a displaced pelvic fracture. Total surgery time was 110 min and an anatomic reduction was achieved. We then present a brief overview of the literature about reduction techniques in pelvic fracture and introduce related principles involved in our robot-assisted reduction system.

Percutaneous Robot-Assisted versus Freehand S2 Iliosacral Screw Fixation in Unstable Posterior Pelvic Ring Fracture

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficiency, safety, and accuracy of S₂ (IS) screw fixation using a robot-assisted method compared with a freehand method.

METHODS

This is a retrospective clinical study. We analyzed the patients treated with S₂ IS screw fixation for unstable pelvic fractures from January 2016 to January 2019 in our institution. Sixty-three patients (17 men and 46 women) aged between 21 and 55 years (with an average age of 39.22 ± 9.28) were included in this study. According to the Tile classification, there were 26 (41.3%) type B fractures and 37 (58.7%) type C fractures. All patients were divided into robot-assisted (RA) group (38 patients) or the traditional freehand (FH) group (25 patients). In RA group, the S₂ IS screws were implanted with a robot-assisted technique. And S₂ IS screws were implanted with a traditional freehand technique in FH group. The screw-related complications were recorded during and after the surgery. The position of all screws and fracture reduction was assessed by postoperative CT scans according to the Gras classification. The number of guide wire attempts and the radiation exposure for S₂ screw implantation during operation were also recorded. Finally, the Matta standard was used to evaluate the fracture reduction of the IS joint.

RESULTS

A total of 89 IS screws were implanted into S2 iliosacral joint. Fifty-four screws were placed by RA (38 patients) and 35 screws were by FH (25 patients). There was no difference between the two groups with respect to demographic data. There was no screw-related complications or revision surgery in any group. In terms of screw placement, the excellent and good rate was 100% in the RA group, better than that in the FH group where it was only 85.7% (P < 0.001). The fluoroscopy time was 8.06 ± 3.54 s in RA group, which was much less than that in the FH group (27.37 ± 8.82 s, P < 0.001). The guide wire attempts in the RA group (0.685 ± 0.820) were much less than those in the FH group (5.77 ± 3.34) (P < 0.001). Both the fluoroscopy time per screw and the number of guide wire attempts in the RA group were much less than those in the FH group (P < 0.001). The overall postoperative excellent and good rate of Matta standard in RA and FH groups were 86.8% (34/4) and 90.0% (23/25), respectively (P = 0.750), and there was no statistical difference.

CONCLUSION

The robot-assisted surgery is an accurate and minimally invasive technique. S₂ IS screw implantation assisted by TiRobot to treat the posterior pelvic ring fractures, have a high success rate than the freehand technique. Percutaneous RA S₂ IS screw fixation for unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries is safe and clinically feasible and has great clinical application value.

Feasibility and accuracy of orthopaedic surgical robot system for intraoperative navigation to locate bone tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The combination of navigational system and robotics has the potential to accurately identify and drill bone tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This study explores the feasibility and accuracy of bone tunnel positioning using the TiRobot, an orthopaedic surgical robot.

METHODS

The experiment was divided into two groups. In group A, the bone tunnels were positioned using the TiRobot surgical robot (n = 8). In group B, handheld locators were used for positioning (n = 8).

RESULTS

TiRobot can be used for positioning the ACL bone tunnel. The accuracy of positioning the femoral tunnel in group A and B was 1.00 ± 0.20 and 3.10 ± 0.59 mm, respectively (t = -9.49, P < 0.001). As for tibial tunnel, the accuracy was 1.02 ± 0.20 and 2.64 ± 0.14 mm, respectively (t = -18.54, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The bone tunnel drilling precision using TiRobot for ACL reconstruction surgery was more accurate than traditional surgical techniques.

Robot-assisted fracture fixation in orthopaedic trauma surgery: a systematic review

Objective:

To investigate the applications of robot-assisted surgery and its effect on surgical outcomes in orthopaedic trauma patients.

Data Sources:

A search was performed in PubMed and Embase for articles in English, Dutch, German, or French, without restrictions on follow-up times, study size, or year of publication.

Study Selection:

Studies were included if they investigated patients undergoing robot-assisted fracture fixation surgery for orthopaedic trauma.

Data Extraction:

Outcomes studied were operating time, fluoroscopy time/frequency, complications, functional outcomes, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing, and screw placement accuracy. Critical appraisal was done by using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.

Data Synthesis:

Narrative review.

Conclusions:

A total of 3832 hits were identified with the search and 8 studies were included with a combined total of 437 included patients, 3 retrospective cohort studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, 1 cohort study not otherwise specified, 1 case series, and 1 randomized controlled trial. Four studies investigated pelvic ring fractures, 3 studies investigated femur fractures, and 1 study investigated scaphoid fractures. Seven investigated percutaneous screw fixation and 1 studied intramedullary nail fixation. One robotic system was used across all studies, the TiRobot, and all procedures were performed in China. The limited evidence suggests that that robot-assisted orthopaedic trauma surgery may reduce operating time, use of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, and improve screw placement accuracy, but the overall quality of evidence was low with a high risk of bias. Robot-assisted fracture fixation does not appear to lead to better functional outcomes for the patient.

Level of evidence: III

Guide wire displacement in robot-assisted spinal pedicle screw implantation

Aim

Guide wire displacement in spinal pedicle screw implantation was analyzed in order to reduce or avoid the occurrence of this phenomenon and to reduce the complications associated with robot-assisted pedicle screw implantation surgery.

Material and methods

From April 2017 to December 2019, a retrospective study was conducted with 398 patients who underwent robot-assisted spinal pedicle screw implantation. The causes of guide wire displacement in 60 punctures were analyzed.

Results

There were 2,408 robot-assisted wire punctures of the pedicle, of which 2,348 wire punctures were located well within the pedicle, and 60 wire displacements occurred during robot-assisted wire puncture, with a displacement rate of 2.49%. There was 1 case of thoracic segmental artery injury and 1 case of spinal cord incomplete injury.

Conclusions

As it is a rare phenomenon in robot-assisted spinal pedicle screw implantation, guide wire displacement should be avoided as much as possible to improve the accuracy of screw placement and reduce surgical complications during the operation.

Accuracy of Robotic-Assisted Spinal Surgery-Comparison to TJR Robotics, da Vinci Robotics, and Optoelectronic Laboratory Robotics

BACKGROUND

The optoelectronic camera source and data interpolation serve as the foundation for navigational integrity in the robotic-assisted surgical platform. The objective of the current systematic review serves to provide a basis for the numerical disparity that exists when comparing the intrinsic accuracy of optoelectronic cameras: accuracy observed in the laboratory setting versus accuracy in the clinical operative environment. It is postulated that there exists a greater number of connections in the optoelectronic kinematic chain when analyzing the clinical operative environment to the laboratory setting. This increase in data interpolation, coupled with intraoperative workflow challenges, reduces the degree of accuracy based on surgical application and to that observed in controlled musculoskeletal kinematic laboratory investigations.

METHODS

Review of the PubMed and Cochrane Library research databases was performed. The exhaustive literature compilation obtained was then vetted to reduce redundancies and categorized into topics of intrinsic optoelectronic accuracy, registration accuracy, musculoskeletal kinematic platforms, and clinical operative platforms.

RESULTS

A total of 147 references make up the basis for the current analysis. Regardless of application, the common denominators affecting overall optoelectronic accuracy are intrinsic accuracy, registration accuracy, and application accuracy. Intrinsic accuracy of optoelectronic tracking equaled or was less than 0.1 mm of translation and 0.1° of rotation per fiducial. Controlled laboratory platforms reported 0.1 to 0.5 mm of translation and 0.1°-1.0° of rotation per array. There is a huge falloff in clinical applications: accuracy in robotic-assisted spinal surgery reported 1.5 to 6.0 mm of translation and 1.5° to 5.0° of rotation when comparing planned to final implant position. Total Joint Robotics and da Vinci urologic robotics computed accuracy, as predicted, lies between these two extremes-1.02 mm for da Vinci and 2 mm for MAKO.

CONCLUSIONS

Navigational integrity and maintenance of fidelity of optoelectronic data is the cornerstone of robotic-assisted spinal surgery. Transitioning from controlled laboratory to clinical operative environments requires an increased number of steps in the optoelectronic kinematic chain and error potential. Diligence in planning, fiducial positioning, system registration, and intraoperative workflow have the potential to improve accuracy and decrease disparity between planned and final implant position. The key determining factors limiting navigation resolution accuracy are highlighted by this Cochrane research analysis.

Robotic-Navigated Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Has Less Facet Joint Violation Than Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Screws

OBJECTIVE

To directly compare robotic-versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement in thoracolumbar spine trauma with a focus on clinically acceptable pedicle screw accuracy and facet joint violation (FJV).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review assessed 37 trauma patients undergoing percutaneous thoracic and/or lumbar fixation. Postoperative computed tomography images were reviewed by authors blinded to surgical technique who assessed pedicle screw trajectory accuracy and FJV frequency.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients underwent placement of 143 PPS with robotic assistance (robot group), compared with 20 patients receiving 149 PPS using fluoroscopy assistance (control group). Overall, the robot cohort demonstrated decreased FJV frequency of 2.8% versus 14.8% in controls (P = 0.0003). When further stratified by level of surgery (i.e., upper thoracic, lower thoracic, lumbar spine), the robot group had FJV frequencies of 0%, 3.2%, and 3.7%, respectively, compared with 17.7% (P = 0.0209), 14.3% (P = 0.0455), and 11.9% (P = 0.2340) in controls. The robot group had 84.6% clinically acceptable screw trajectories compared with 81.9% in controls (P = 0.6388). Within the upper thoracic, lower thoracic, and lumbar regions, the robot group had acceptable screw trajectories of 66.7%, 87.1%, and 90.7%, respectively, compared with 58.8% (P = 0.6261), 91.1% (P = 0.5655), and 97.6% (P = 0.2263) in controls.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in clinically acceptable screw trajectory accuracy between robotic versus fluoroscopy-guided PPS placement. However, the robot cohort demonstrated a statistically significantly decreased FJV overall and specifically within the thoracic spine region. Use of robotic technology may improve radiographic outcomes for a subset of patients or spine surgeries.

Development status of telesurgery robotic system

As an emerging field, telesurgery robotic system is changing the traditional medical mode and can delivery remote surgical treatment anywhere in the world. Advances in telesurgery robotic technology achieve the remote control beyond the current limitation of distance and special medical environment. This review introduces the development history, the current status and the potential in future of the telesurgery robotic system. In addition, it presents the construction of control platform and the application, especially in trauma treatment, as well as the challenge in clinic.

Robot-assisted double screw fixation of minimally displaced scaphoid waist fracture nonunions or delayed unions without bone graft

We retrospectively reviewed 12 minimally displaced fractures of the scaphoid waist in 12 patients who developed delayed or nonunions with or without conservative treatment. Mean time between injury and surgery was 6 months (range 3-12). The fractures were stabilized with double screws, which were percutaneously inserted with robot assistance, and without bone grafting. All fractures united at a mean of 8 weeks (range 6-10) after surgery. The patients were followed-up at 6 months and 1 year. The patients recovered good wrist function. No major postoperative complications were reported, and the patients returned to their usual level of activity. Robot assistance gave a high degree of accuracy when placing the cannulated screws since only two attempts were needed for correct placement of the guide wires. We explain the high union incidence by patient selection, good stabilization and not disturbing the vascular supply.Level of evidence: IV.

A cost benefit analysis of increasing surgical technology in lumbar spine fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Numerous advances have been made in the field of spine fusion, such as minimally invasive (MIS) or robotic-assisted spine surgery. However, it is unknown how these advances have impacted the cost of care.

PURPOSE

Compare the economic outcomes of lumbar spine fusion between open, MIS, and robot-assisted surgery patients.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective review of a single center spine surgery database.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Three hundred sixty propensity matched patients.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs, EuroQol-5D (EQ5D), cost per quality adjusted life years (QALY).

METHODS

Inclusion criteria: surgical patients >18 years undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on procedure type: open, MIS, or robotic. Open patients undergoing poster spinal fusion were considered as the control group. MIS patients included those undergoing transforaminal or lateral lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous screws. Robotic patients were those undergoing robot-assisted fusion. Propensity score matching was performed between all groups for the number of levels fused. Costs were calculated using the PearlDiver database, which reflects both private insurance and Medicare reimbursement claims for ICD-9 codes. For robotic cases, costs were reflective of operational fees and initial purchase cost. Complications and comorbidities and major complications and comorbidities were assessed according to CMS.gov manual definitions. QALYs and cost per QALY were calculated using a 3% discount rate to account for residual decline to life expectancy (78.7 years). Costs per QALY were calculated for both 1 year and life expectancy, assuming no loss of benefit. A 10,000 trial Monte Carlo simulation with probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) assessed our model parameters and costs.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty propensity matched patients (120 open, 120 MIS, 120 robotic) met inclusion criteria. Descriptive statistics for the cohort were: age 58.8±13.5, 50% women, BMI 29.4±6.3, operative time 294.4±119.0, LOS 4.56±3.31 days, estimated blood loss 515.9±670.0 cc, and 2.3±2.2 average levels fused. Rates of post-op complications were significantly higher in robotic cases versus open and MIS (43% vs. 21% and 22% for open and MIS, p<.05). However, revision rates were comparable between all groups (3% open, 3% MIS, 5% robotic, p>.05). After factoring in complications, revisions, and purchasing and operating fees, the costs of robotic cases was significantly higher than both open and MIS surgery ($60,047.01 vs. $42,538.98 open and $41,471.21 MIS). In a subanalysis of 42 patients with baseline (BL) and 1Y EQ5D data, the cost per QALY at 1Y for open, MIS, and robot-assisted cases was $296,624.48, $115,911.69, and $592,734.30. If utility gained was sustained to life expectancy, the cost per QALY was $14,905.75, $5,824.71, $29,785.64 for open, MIS, and robot-assisted cases. Results of the PSA were consistent with MIS surgery having the most incremental cost effectiveness when compared to open and robotic surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous advances have been made in the field of spine surgery, however, there has been limited discussion of the effect these advances have on economic outcomes. When matched for levels fused, robot-assisted surgery patients had significantly higher rates of complications and 30% higher costs of surgery compared to minimally invasive and open spine surgery patients. While 1 year economic outcomes were not optimal for robotic surgery cases, the projected costs per QALYs at life expectancy were well below established acceptable thresholds. The above findings may be reflective of an educational learning curve and emerging surgical technologies undergoing progressive refinement.

A useful intraoperative technique for transiliac-transsacral screws: a point-to-point coaxial guide apparatus

Background

The transiliac-transsacral screw placement is a clinical challenge for surgeons. This study explored a point-to-point coaxial guide apparatus assisting the transiliac-transsacral screw insertion and aimed to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of the guide apparatus in the treatment of posterior ring unstable pelvic fracture compared with a free-hand technique.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed to evaluate patients treated with transiliac-transsacral screws assisted by the point-to-point coaxial guide apparatus or free-hand technique. The intraoperative data of operative time and radiation exposure times were recorded. Postoperative radiographs and CT scans were performed to scrutinize the accuracy of screws position. The quality of the postoperative fracture reduction was assessed according to Matta radiology criteria. The pelvic function was assessed according to the Majeed scoring criteria at 6 months postoperatively.

Results

From July 2017 to December 2019, a total of 38 patients were included in this study, 20 from the point-to-point guide apparatus group and 18 from the free-hand group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in gender, age, injury causes, pelvic fracture type, screws level, and follow-up time (P > 0.05). The average operative time of the guide apparatus group for each screw was significantly less than that in the free-hand group (25.8 ± 4.7 min vs 40.5 ± 5.1, P < 0.001). The radiation exposure times were significantly lower in the guide apparatus group than that in the free-hand group (24.4 ± 6.0 vs 51.6 ± 8.4, P < 0.001). The intraosseous and juxtacortical rate of screw placement (100%) higher than in the free-hand group (94.4%).

Conclusion

The point-to-point coaxial guide apparatus is feasible for assisting the transiliac-transsacral screw in the treatment of posterior unstable pelvic fractures. It has the advantages of simple operation, reasonable design and no need for expensive equipment, and provides an additional surgical strategy for the insertion of the transiliac-transsacral screw.

The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery

The advent and widespread adoption of pedicle screw instrumentation prompted the need for image guidance in spine surgery to improve accuracy and safety. Although the conventional method, fluoroscopy, is readily available and inexpensive, concerns regarding radiation exposure and the drive to provide better visual guidance spurred the development of computer-assisted navigation. Contemporaneously, a non-navigated robotic guidance platform was also introduced as a competing modality for pedicle screw placement. Although the robot could provide high precision trajectory guidance by restricting four of the six degrees of freedom (DOF), the lack of real-time depth control and high capital acquisition cost diminished its popularity, while computer-assisted navigation platforms became increasingly sophisticated and accepted. The recent integration of real-time 3D navigation with robotic platforms has resulted in a resurgence of interest in robotics in spine surgery with the recent introduction of numerous navigated robotic platforms. The currently available navigated robotic spine surgery platforms include the ROSA Spine Robot (Zimmer Biomet Robotics formerly Medtech SA, Montpellier, France), ExcelsiusGPS^® (Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA, USA), Mazor X spine robot (Medtronic Navigation Louisville, CO; Medtronic Spine, Memphis, TN; formerly Mazor Robotics, Caesarea, Israel) and TiRobot (TINAVI Medical Technologies, Beijing, China). Here we provide an overview of these navigated spine robotic platforms, existing applications, and potential future avenues of implementation.

Research quality and transparency, outcome measurement and evidence for safety and effectiveness in robot-assisted surgery: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has potential panspecialty surgical benefits. High-quality evidence for widespread implementation is lacking. This systematic review aimed to assess the RAS evidence base for the quality of randomized evidence on safety and effectiveness, specialty 'clustering', and outcomes for RAS research.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken according to PRISMA guidelines. All pathologies and procedures utilizing RAS were included. Studies were limited to RCTs, the English language and publication within the last decade. The main outcomes selected for the review design were safety and efficacy, and study purpose. Secondary outcomes were study characteristics, funding and governance.

RESULTS

Searches identified 7142 titles, from which 183 RCTs were identified for data extraction. The commonest specialty was urology (35·0 per cent). There were just 76 unique study populations, indicating significant overlap of publications; 103 principal studies were assessed further. Only 64·1 per cent of studies reported a primary outcome measure, with 29·1 per cent matching their registration/protocol. Safety was assessed in 68·9 per cent of trials; operative complications were the commonest measure. Forty-eight per cent of trials reported no significant difference in safety between RAS and comparator, and 11 per cent reported RAS to be superior. Efficacy or effectiveness was assessed in 80·6 per cent of trials; 43 per cent of trials showed no difference between RAS and comparator, and 24 per cent reported that RAS was superior. Funding was declared in 47·6 per cent of trials.

CONCLUSION

The evidence base for RAS is of limited quality and variable transparency in reporting. No patterns of harm to patients were identified. RAS has potential to be beneficial, but requires continued high-quality evaluation.