Bone tumor mimickers: A pictorial essay

Pseudolesions involving bone and soft tissue regarding orthopedic oncology

Pseudolesions in bone and muscle are encountered mostly incidentally in routine imaging studies, especially due to the recent advancements on many different imaging modalities. These lesions can be categorized into the following categories: normal variants; congenital; iatrogenic; degenerative; and postoperative. In this review, we discuss the many different radiological characteristics of musculoskeletal pseudolesions that appear on imaging, which can prevent non-essential additional studies.

Neoplastic and Non-neoplastic Bone Lesions of the Knee

Numerous anatomical variants are described around the knee, many of which look like bony lesions, so it is important to know them to avoid unnecessary complementary tests and inadequate management. Likewise, several alterations in relation to normal development can also simulate bone lesions.However, numerous pathologic processes frequently affect the knee, including traumatic, inflammatory, infectious, and tumor pathology. Many of these entities show typical radiologic features that facilitate their diagnosis. In other cases, a correct differential diagnosis is necessary for proper clinical management.Despite the availability of increasingly advanced imaging techniques, plain radiography is still the technique of choice in the initial study of many of these pathologies. This article reviews the radiologic characteristics of tumor and nontumor lesions that may appear around the knee to make a correct diagnosis and avoid unnecessary complementary radiologic examinations and inadequate clinical management.

FDG-Avid Periprosthetic Particle Disease Mimicking Osteosarcoma Recurrence

ABSTRACT

A 24-year-old man with a history of osteosarcoma presented with swelling in his right thigh for more than 1 year. 18 F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated increased FDG uptake in multiple juxtacortical masses around the prosthesis, which highly suggested the possibility of osteosarcoma recurrence. A biopsy was performed, and the pathology confirmed the diagnosis of particle disease. The current case indicates that particle disease should be considered when interpreting the PET/CT images with high FDG uptake around the prosthesis.

Society of skeletal radiology position paper - recommendations for contrast use in musculoskeletal MRI: when is non-contrast imaging enough?

The following White Paper will discuss the appropriateness of gadolinium administration in MRI for musculoskeletal indications. Musculoskeletal radiologists should consider the potential risks involved and practice the judicious use of intravenous contrast, restricting administration to cases where there is demonstrable added value. Specific nuances of when contrast is or is not recommended are discussed in detail and listed in table format. Briefly, contrast is recommended for bone and soft tissue lesions. For infection, contrast is reserved for chronic or complex cases. In rheumatology, contrast is recommended for early detection but not for advanced arthritis. Contrast is not recommended for sports injuries, routine MRI neurography, implants/hardware, or spine imaging, but is helpful in complex and post-operative cases.

Benign incidental do-not-touch bone lesions

Benign bone lesions may occasionally be incidentally detected on radiographs and are also increasingly found on CT or MRI performed for other clinical indications. Although mostly asymptomatic or associated with minor symptoms, these lesions may simulate true pathological lesions, causing problems in diagnosis. For instance, asymptomatic benign bone lesions can be misinterpreted as metastasis when incidentally encountered in a patient with known cancer. Recognising these entities as "do-not-touch" lesions helps avoid unnecessary further investigation or harmful intervention. In this review, we highlight three groups of bone incidentalomas found in adults, namely: osteolytic lesions, osteoblastic lesions, and bone protuberances. We aim to review the key imaging features of selected common and less common conditions in these three groups, so as to help radiologists confidently identify these benign do-not-touch lesions and to distinguish them from more sinister pathological lesions.

Magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating between aggressive and non-aggressive bone tumors

BACKGROUND

While radiography remains essential in the initial evaluation of bone lesions, tissue biopsy or further imaging is often required to clarify indeterminate radiographic features. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assists radiologists in evaluating lesions with indeterminate features as it has advantages in delineating tumorous tissues and bone marrow.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association factors of MRI for bony aggressiveness.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 226 MRI examinations from patients diagnosed with bone tumors in a tertiary hospital during 2008-2018 was performed. All the MR images were interpreted by musculoskeletal radiologists without diagnostic information. The bony lesions were categorized into aggressive and non-aggressive groups using tumor margin, cortical changes, periosteal reaction, joint extension, extraosseous soft tissue involvement, tumor homogeneity, and enhancement pattern from the MR images. Univariable and multivariable analysis were applied for each feature on the MRI scans. In addition, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for MRI diagnoses of aggressive bone lesions.

RESULTS

In total, 180 aggressive and 46 non-aggressive bone lesions were examined on MRI. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for differentiating between aggressive and non-aggressive bone lesions were 98.89% and 50%, respectively. Ill-defined margin, cortical break, cortical signal changes, sunburst and Codman's triangle periosteal reaction, joint extension, and tumoral and heterogeneous enhancement could be predictive signs for aggressive bone lesions.

CONCLUSION

MRI can be a valuable tool to assist in distinguishing aggressive from non-aggressive bone lesions. In cases of indeterminate radiographic features, MRI could be used as an additional imaging to improve diagnostic accuracy and could reduce unnecessary invasive procedures.

Cystic lesions of the humeral head on magnetic resonance imaging: a pictorial review

Cystic lesions of the humeral head are commonly encountered on routine shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Differential diagnoses include degenerative lesions, calcific tendinitis with osseous involvement, perianchor cysts, abscesses and less often, tumours. Degenerative lesions, including subcortical and subchondral cysts, are the most commonly encountered. These may be associated with rotator cuff disease and degenerative joint diseases or considered part of ageing depending on the location of the cystic lesions. For instance, cysts of the bare area of the humeral head are considered benign age-related entities, whereas cysts of the greater or lesser tuberosity may herald rotator cuff disease. Infectious lesions, particularly osteomyelitis and intraosseous (Brodie’s) abscesses, are intramedullary in location and should be suspected in the context of clinical features such as fever and radiological features such as the penumbra sign. Perianchor cysts are postoperative lesions associated with the use of suture anchors in surgeries such as rotator cuff tear repairs. They generally self-resolve over 18 to 24 months. On MRI, the distribution, morphology, and signal characteristics can help point towards a specific diagnosis. The patient’s demographic, clinical presentation, and past surgical history can be discriminatory. Knowledge of different cystic lesions in the humeral head and underlying aetiology can be useful in helping the radiologist develop a more thorough search pattern for associated conditions. Determining the underlying cause of cysts can have important implications on management, such as when differentiating perianchor cysts from infection. This pictorial review outlines the differential diagnoses of humeral head cysts on MRI and provides a diagnostic approach for the radiologist.

Transient Hip Osteoporosis: Etiopathogenetic, Clinical, and Imaging Approach

Transient Hip Osteoporosis (THO) is a relatively rare, benign, and usually self-limiting disease caused by bone marrow edema, depicted on MRI. It presents with sudden onset of pain or may be asymptomatic. Given the poor coverage of this subject in the relevant international literature and the lack of sufficient understanding of the aetiopathogenic mechanisms underlying this condition, no established diagnostic guidelines are available, leading to frequent under- or overdiagnosis. Therefore, great care should be taken to provide a correct differential diagnosis in order to achieve proper treatment. The international literature from 1990 to 2020 was searched in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The keywords: bone marrow edema, transient osteoporosis, osteonecrosis, and aetiopathogenesis were used, and original studies and review articles in English and Greek language were retrieved. Based on evidence provided in the current literature, this article offers a definition and describes in a concise and comprehensive manner the aetiopathogenesis, symptomatology, imaging findings, and differential diagnosis of the disease, in order to provide physicians with a sound knowledge of the condition, necessary to their clinical practice.

Giant Tug Lesion of the Soleus

Teaching point: A giant soleus tug lesion is a benign pseudo-tumoral excrescence at the attachment of the soleus muscle at the posterior upper third of the tibia.

Shoulder Tumor/Tumor-Like Lesions: What to Look for

This article discusses the most common tumor and tumor-like lesions arising at the shoulder. Osseous tumors of the shoulder rank second in incidence to those at the knee joint and include benign osteochondromas and myeloma or primary malignant lesions, such as osteosarcoma or chondrosarcomas. Soft tissue tumors are overwhelmingly benign, with lipomas predominating, although malignant lesions, such as liposarcomas, can occur. Numerous tumor-like lesions may arise from the joints or bursae, due to either underlying arthropathy and synovitis (eg, rheumatoid arthritis and amyloid) or related to conditions, including tenosynovial giant cell tumor and synovial osteochondromatosis.

Musculoskeletal "don't touch" lesions: pictorial essay

Focal bone lesions are not uncommon findings in the daily practice of radiology. Therefore, it is essential to differentiate between lesions with aggressive, malignant potential that require action and those that have no clinical significance, many of which are variants or benign lesions, sometimes self-limited and related to reactive processes. In some cases, a diagnostic error can have catastrophic results. For example, a biopsy performed in a patient with myositis ossificans can lead to an incorrect diagnosis of sarcomatous lesions and consequently to mutilating surgical procedures. The present study reviews the main radiological aspects of the lesions that are most commonly seen in daily practice and have the potential to be confused with aggressive, malignant bone processes. We also illustrate these entities by presenting cases seen at our institution.

Tibial periosteal ganglion cyst: The ganglion in disguise

Soft tissue ganglions are commonly encountered cystic lesions around the wrist presumed to arise from myxomatous degeneration of periarticular connective tissue. Lesions with similar pathology in subchondral location close to joints, and often simulating a geode, is the less common entity called intraosseous ganglion. Rarer still is a lesion produced by mucoid degeneration and cyst formation of the periostium of long bones, rightly called the periosteal ganglion. They are mostly found in the lower extremities at the region of pes anserinus, typically limited to the periosteum and outer cortex without any intramedullary component. We report the case of a 62 year-old male who presented with a tender swelling on the mid shaft of the left tibia, which radiologically suggested a juxtacortical lesion extending to the soft tissue or a soft tissue neoplasm eroding the bony cortex of tibia. It was later diagnosed definitively as a periosteal ganglion in an atypical location, on further radiologic work-up and histopathological correlation.

Benign Bone Conditions That May Be FDG-avid and Mimic Malignancy

Positron emission tomography with the radiotracer ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) plays an important role in the evaluation of bone pathology. However, FDG is not a cancer-specific agent, and knowledge of the differential diagnosis of benign FDG-avid bone alterations that may resemble malignancy is important for correct patient management, including the avoidance of unnecessary additional invasive tests such as bone biopsy. This review summarizes and illustrates the spectrum of benign bone conditions that may be FDG-avid and mimic malignancy, including osteomyelitis, bone lesions due to benign systemic diseases (Brown tumor, Erdheim-Chester disease, Gaucher disease, gout and other types of arthritis, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, and sarcoidosis), benign primary bone lesions (bone cysts, chondroblastoma, chondromyxoid fibroma, desmoplastic fibroma, enchondroma, giant cell tumor and granuloma, hemangioma, nonossifying fibroma, and osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma), and a group of miscellaneous benign bone conditions (post bone marrow biopsy or harvest status, bone marrow hyperplasia, fibrous dysplasia, fractures, osteonecrosis, Paget disease of bone, particle disease, and Schmorl nodes). Several ancillary clinical and imaging findings may be helpful in discriminating benign from malignant FDG-avid bone lesions. However, this distinction is sometimes difficult or even impossible, and tissue acquisition will be required to establish the final diagnosis.