Efficacy of basiliximab induction in poorly matched living donor renal transplantation

Predictors of Short-Term Outcomes in Living Donor Renal Allograft Recipients: A Prospective Study From a Tertiary Care Center in North India

Background

Renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients of all ages with end-stage kidney disease. The long-term outcomes of renal transplantation are assessed by graft and patient survival rates. These outcomes are, in turn, influenced by post-transplant events such as delayed graft function, rejections, post-transplant infections, and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). Each of these short-term outcomes is, in turn, determined by the interplay of various factors in the pre-, peri-, and post-transplant period. This prospective study was designed to understand the factors affecting short-term outcomes in living donor transplantation and their effect on graft and patient survival.

Methodology

A total of 86 patients underwent live donor renal transplantation between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2016, at a tertiary care hospital in north India. Of these, five were lost to follow-up, and the remaining 81 patients were prospectively followed up to December 31, 2017.

Results

The majority of the recipients were males (91%) and the donors were females (74%). Spousal and related donors comprised 49% and 51% of donations, respectively. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of donors was 98 ± 9.2 mL/minute/1.73m². Induction therapy with basiliximab was given to 21/81 (26%) recipients. The majority of recipients (68/81, 84%) received triple-drug immunosuppression with prednisolone, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Delayed graft function (DGF) occurred in 4/81 (4.9%) cases. Biopsy-proven acute rejections (BPARs) occurred in 15/81 (18.5%) cases, two-thirds of which were acute antibody-mediated rejections (ABMRs). During the follow-up period, 50 episodes of infections occurred in 35/81 (43.2%) recipients, with the most common being urinary tract infection (23/81, 28.5%). PTDM was diagnosed in 22/81 (27.2%) patients beyond six weeks of transplant. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the most significant predictor of DGF was acute rejections and vice versa. Acute rejections also predicted the occurrence of post-transplant infections. Pre-transplant hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and cyclosporine-based therapy were significant predictors of PTDM. At the six-month follow-up, 10/81 (12.3%) patients developed graft dysfunction. The predictors of graft dysfunction at six months were recipients of related donors and rural patients. One-year graft survival, death-censored graft survival, and patient survival rates were 85.2%, 92.6%, and 91.3%, respectively. The most common cause of death was post-transplant infections (5/7, 71.4%) of which the majority (4/5, 80%) were fungal infections. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the most significant predictor of graft loss and patient loss was low pre-transplant donor eGFR and PTDM, respectively.

Conclusions

Graft and patient survival in living donor kidney transplantation are influenced by a multitude of interdependent factors during the pre-transplant (donor eGFR, type of donor, socioeconomic status, HCV infection in recipient, type of immunosuppression) and the post-transplant (DGF, rejections, infections, and PTDM) period.

Outcomes of Interleukin-2 Receptor Antagonist Induction Therapy in Standard-Risk Renal Transplant Recipients Maintained on Tacrolimus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The additive benefit of interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2-RA) induction in standard-risk kidney transplant recipients, while maintained on tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy, is uncertain.

METHODS

We divided the studies included in this meta-analysis into 2 groups: group A (included studies that used same dose of tacrolimus in both arms of each study) and group B (included studies that compared patients who received induction therapy and low-dose tacrolimus vs. those who received no-induction therapy and high dose of tacrolimus).

RESULTS

In group A, 11 studies were included (n = 2,886). IL2-RA induction therapy was not associated with significant differences in comparison to no-induction therapy in terms of acute rejection rates at 6 months post-transplant (risk ratio = 1.12 and 95% confidence interval [CI] range: 0.94-1.35) or graft survival at 1 year post-transplant (risk ratio = 0.78 and 95% CI range: 0.45-1.36). In group B, 2 studies were included (n = 669). There was no difference between both arms in terms of acute rejection rates (risk ratio = 0.62, with 95% CI range: 0.33-1.14) or graft survival (risk ratio = 1 and 95% CI range: 0.57-1.74).

CONCLUSION

IL2-RA induction therapy does not improve outcomes in patients maintained on tacrolimus-based immunotherapy in standard-risk population.

Outcomes of Spousal versus Parental Donor Kidney Transplants: A Comparative Study

Introduction:

Parents and spouse constitute 70% of organ donors in India. Some centres use induction immunosuppression (IS) for all spousal transplants considering it as an immunologically high risk. This study was designed to compare the outcomes of transplant recipients who received parental donors (PDs) and spousal donors (SDs) without any induction IS.

Methods:

It was a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in South India. Adults aged 18 years or above who underwent renal transplantation from a SD or PD between January 2006 and December 2016 were included in the study.

Results:

Our study included 154 patients with PDs and 75 patients with SDs. The mean recipient age of the PD group was 27.79 ± 6.85 years and of the SD group was 45.62 ± 7.96 years (P < 0.001). However, the follow-up period was significantly higher for the PD group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between acute rejection, patient loss, mean survival, graft survival (uncensored), and death censored graft survival between two groups.

Conclusion:

The outcomes of immunologically low-risk transplant recipients who have received PD and SD are similar and induction immunosuppression can be avoided in these patients.

Induction therapy of basiliximab versus antithymocyte globulin in renal allograft: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of basiliximab versus antithymocyte globulin for induction therapy in renal allograft.

METHODS

Medline (PubMed), Embase, Ovid, Cochrane, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature databases were searched to identify prospective randomized controlled trials that compared basiliximab with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) for induction therapy in renal transplantation. RevMan 5.1 software and Stat Manager V4.1 software were used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs were included, including a total of 1153 patients. Of these, 547 (47%) had received basiliximab, and 606 (53%) had received ATG. The pooled results revealed that the basiliximab had a lower rate of neoplasm compared with ATG [odds ratio (OR) 0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.78; P = 0.02]. There were no significant differences between the two drugs regarding 1-year acute rejection rate (OR 1.32; 95% CI 0.93-1.87; P = 0.13), 1-year graft survival rate (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.45-1.18; P = 0.20), 1-year patient survival rate (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.27-1.02; P = 0.06), 1-year infection rate (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.48-1.68; P = 0.73).

CONCLUSION

Induction therapy of basiliximab has similar short-time effects on the recipients in renal transplantation compared with that of ATG. However, regarding the long-term effect, as represented by the rate of neoplasm, basiliximab has a significant advantage.

Novel surgical techniques, regenerative medicine, tissue engineering and innovative immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

On the 60th anniversary of the first successfully performed renal transplantation, we summarize the historical, current and potential future status of kidney transplantation. We discuss three different aspects with a potential significant influence on kidney transplantation progress: the development of surgical techniques, the influence of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering, and changes in immunosuppression. We evaluate the standard open surgical procedures with modern techniques and compare them to less invasive videoscopic as well as robotic techniques. The role of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine as a potential method for future kidney regeneration or replacement and the interesting search for novel solutions in the field of immunosuppression will be discussed. After 60 years since the first successfully performed kidney transplantation, we can conclude that the greatest achievements are associated with the development of surgical techniques and with planned systemic immunosuppression.

Outcomes of spousal versus related donor kidney transplants: A comparative study

This study was designed to compare the outcomes of spousal donor (SD) with related donor (RD) kidney transplants performed at our center between January 2010 and October 2012. A total of 323 adult, ABO-compatible kidney transplants (SD 150 [46.4%], RD 173 [53.6%]) were included. Data on outcomes at 6 months post-transplant was collected retrospectively (2010-2011) and prospectively (January-October 2012). Majority of the donors (SD 88%, RD 72.2%) were females. In the SD group, donors were younger (SD 35.6 ± 8.2 years, RD 45.2 ± 11.5 years; P < 0.0001), whereas recipients were older (SD 42.2 ± 8.3 years, RD 30.0 ± 9.5 years; P < 0.0001). A significantly higher proportion of patients in the SD group were given induction therapy (43% vs 12%; P < 0.001). Biopsy proven acute rejections were more common in the RD group (16% vs 28.3%; P = 0.01). Majority (80.8%) of the acute rejections occurred in the first 2 weeks post-transplant in both groups. Isolated acute cellular rejections (ACRs) and isolated antibody mediated rejections constituted 50% and 25% of rejection episodes in both groups, whereas the remainder had histological evidence of both. The proportion of steroid responsive ACRs was similar in both groups (SD 83.3%, RD 65.4%; P = 0.2). The number of patients with abnormal graft function at the end of the study was higher in the RD group (2.3% vs. 12.3%; P = 0.001). Patient survival and infection rates were similar in the two groups. We conclude that short-term outcomes of SD transplants are not inferior to RD transplants. Lesser use of induction therapy in the RD group may explain the poorer outcomes as compared to the SD group.