Renal Transplant in Elderly End-Stage Renal Disease Patients: Impact of Comorbidities and Posttransplant Adverse Events on Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Elderly renal transplant continues to be debated because of age-related factors affecting transplant success and long-term prognosis. We investigated the effects ofrecipient age and predictors of renal transplant outcomes in elderly renal transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 506 patients who had a first renal transplant between January 2010 and December 2020; there were 165 recipients aged ≥60 years (elderly) and 341 recipients aged <60 years (young).We collected recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics and assessed 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall patient and death-censored graft survival and risk factors influencing outcomes ofrenal transplant in elderly recipients.

RESULTS

Elderly recipients showed significantly lower 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates (96.3%, 89.8%, 80.9%) than young recipients (98.8%, 98.5%, 97.8%; P < .001). However, death-censored graft survival rates were not significantly different (P = .459) between elderly (96.3%, 94.3%, 93.2%) and young recipients (97.7%, 97.0%, 93.9%). Advanced recipient age was identified as an independent risk factor for patient survival, irrespective of donor age. In elderly recipients, male gender (hazard ratio 2.013; 95% CI, 1.110-3.649), pretransplant cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio 1.774; 95% CI, 1.030-3.553), and posttransplant chestinfection (hazard ratio 2.421; 95% CI, 1.439-4.076) were significant predictors of inferior patient survival. Proteinuria at 1 month (hazard ratio 1.006; 95% CI, 1.000-1.011) and low estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 months (hazard ratio 0.943; 95% CI, 0.899-0.988) posttransplant were early predictors of worse death-censored graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly renaltransplantrecipients showed promising 5-year patient and death-censored graft survival, exceeding 80%, despite higher mortality risk compared with young recipients. Optimizing outcomes of elderly renal transplant necessitates a multifaceted approach encompassing meticulous pretransplant cardiovascular disease assessment, rigorous posttransplant chest infection prevention and management, and proactive monitoring for early posttransplant kidney dysfunction, to permit timely intervention.

Post-transplant malignancy: Focusing on virus-associated etiologies, pathogenesis, evidence-based management algorithms, present status of adoptive immunotherapy and future directions

Modern immunosuppression has led to a decrease in rejection rates and improved survival rates after solid organ transplantation. Increasing the potency of immunosuppression promotes post-transplant viral infections and associated cancers by impairing immune response against viruses and cancer immunoediting. This review reflects the magnitude, etiology and immunological characteristics of various virus-related post-transplant malignancies, emphasizing the need for future research. A multidisciplinary and strategic approach may serve best but overall literature evidence targeting it is sparse. However, the authors attempted to provide a more detailed update of the literature consensus for the prevention, diagnosis, management and surveillance of post-transplant viral infections and associated malignancies, with a focus on the current role of adoptive immunotherapy and the way forward. In order to achieve long-term patient and graft survival as well as superior post-transplant outcomes, collaborative research on holistic care of organ recipients is imperative.

Hematopoietic cell-based and non-hematopoietic cell-based strategies for immune tolerance induction in living-donor renal transplantation: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Despite its use to prevent acute rejection, lifelong immunosuppression can adversely impact long-term patient and graft outcomes. In theory, immunosuppression withdrawal is the ultimate goal of kidney transplantation, and is made possible by the induction of immunological tolerance. The purpose of this paper is to review the safety and efficacy of immune tolerance induction strategies in living-donor kidney transplantation, both chimerism-based and non-chimerism-based. The impact of these strategies on transplant outcomes, including acute rejection, allograft function and survival, cost, and immune monitoring, will also be discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, as well as additional online resources such as EBSCO, were exhaustively searched. Adult living-donor kidney transplant recipients who developed chimerism-based tolerance after concurrent bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or those who received non-chimerism-based, non-hematopoietic cell therapy using mesenchymal stromal cells, dendritic cells, or regulatory T cells were studied between 2000 and 2021. Individual sources of evidence were evaluated critically, and the strength of evidence and risk of bias for each outcome of the transplant tolerance study were assessed.

RESULTS

From 28,173 citations, 245 studies were retrieved after suitable exclusion and duplicate removal. Of these, 22 studies (2 RCTs, 11 cohort studies, 6 case-control studies, and 3 case reports) explicitly related to both interventions (chimerism- and non-chimerism-based immune tolerance) were used in the final review process and were critically appraised. According to the findings, chimerism-based strategies fostered immunotolerance, allowing for the safe withdrawal of immunosuppressive medications. Cell-based therapy, on the other hand, frequently did not induce tolerance except for minimising immunosuppression. As a result, the rejection rates, renal allograft function, and survival rates could not be directly compared between these two groups. While chimerism-based tolerance protocols posed safety concerns due to myelosuppression, including infections and graft-versus-host disease, cell-based strategies lacked these adverse effects and were largely safe. There was a lack of direct comparisons between HLA-identical and HLA-disparate recipients, and the cost implications were not examined in several of the retrieved studies. Most studies reported successful immunosuppressive weaning lasting at least 3 years (ranging up to 11.4 years in some studies), particularly with chimerism-based therapy, while only a few investigators used immune surveillance techniques. The studies reviewed were often limited by selection, classification, ascertainment, performance, and attrition bias.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates that chimerism-based hematopoietic strategies induce immune tolerance, and a substantial number of patients are successfully weaned off immunosuppression. Despite the risk of complications associated with myelosuppression. Non-chimerism-based, non-hematopoietic cell protocols, on the other hand, have been proven to facilitate immunosuppression minimization but seldom elicit immunological tolerance. However, the results of this review must be interpreted with caution because of the non-randomised study design, potential confounding, and small sample size of the included studies. Further validation and refinement of tolerogenic protocols in accordance with local practice preferences is also warranted, with an emphasis on patient selection, cost ramifications, and immunological surveillance based on reliable tolerance assays.

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Kidney Transplantation: A Narrative Review of Clinical Management Approaches

Inflammatory bowel disease is not uncommon among kidney transplant recipients. In transplant patients with chronic diarrhea and abdominal pain, de novo inflammatory bowel disease can be considered among differential diagnoses, after exclusion of infectious causes and drug-induced diarrhea. Inflammatory bowel disease, in the cnnnontext of organ transplant, is associated with a higherrisk of morbidity, increased rate of hospitalization, and higher mortality.Therefore, a multidisciplinary approach, before and after transplant, among a gastroenterologist specialized in inflammatory bowel disease, a gastrointestinal surgeon, and a transplant clinician is essential, given the higher clinical complexity for this subgroup of patients. Limited data are available on management of inflammatory bowel disease in kidney transplant recipients, although the concurrent use of immunosuppressive therapy can mitigate flare-ups but with increased infection risks. Colorectal cancer can be a serious complication of inflammatory bowel disease; hence, patient compliance with regular colonoscopy surveillance programs is crucial. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease who are undergoing kidney transplant have a shorter overall survival rate compared with matched control groups. However, inferences based on studies involving inflammatory bowel disease in kidney transplant recipients are blighted by small sample sizes,thus making it difficult to draw accurate conclusions. Our review was undertaken to comprehensively report the clinical approaches to kidney transplant recipients with inflammatory bowel disease, describing their clinical course, outcomes, and management plan.

Management of pre-renal transplant secondary hyperparathyroidism: parathyroidectomy versus cinacalcet

Background

Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a common consequence of end-stage renal disease. Despite the efficacy of kidney transplantation in treating renal failure, many transplant recipients still suffer from persistent or tertiary hyperparathyroidism. Furthermore, the impact of secondary hyperparathyroidism therapy choices on other renal transplant outcomes is poorly understood.

Methods

We retrieved the clinical data of 334 patients who received a kidney allograft between January 2007 and December 2014 at the Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom. We identified three groups: parathyroidectomy group (34 patients), including patients who had parathyroidectomy before transplantation; cinacalcet group (31 patients), including patients who received cinacalcet before transplantation; and control group (269 patients), including patients who receive a transplant in the same period but did not have any evidence of hyperparathyroidism. We reviewed the demographic data, biochemical parameters and graft survival of all groups.

Results

Patients who underwent parathyroidectomy before transplantation had significantly better post-transplant calcium and parathyroid hormone levels than patients in the cinacalcet group (p=0.003). In addition, a significantly lower number of patients had tertiary hyperparathyroidism in the parathyroidectomy group than in the cinacalcet group at 1 year of follow-up (p=0.001). However, short-term and long-term graft survival was comparable in all groups.

Conclusions

Renal allograft survival was comparable in all groups. However, tertiary hyperparathyroidism was less likely to occur in patients who underwent parathyroidectomy than in those who were administered cinacalcet.

Infertility, pregnancy and breastfeeding in kidney transplantation recipients: Key issues

Chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially in advanced stages, is an important cause of infertility. In CKD patients, infertility has been linked to multiple factors. The pathophysiology of infertility related to CKD is complex and forked. Correction of modifiable factors can improve fertility in both genders. In males as well as females, successful kidney transplantation offers good chances of restoration of reproductive function. In female renal allograft recipients, recovery of reproductive functions in the post-transplant period will manifest as restoration of normal menses and ovulation. Owing to this improvement, there is a significant risk of unplanned pregnancy, hence the need to discuss methods of contraception before transplantation. In kidney transplant recipients, different contraceptive options for pregnancy planning, have been used. The selection of one contraception over another is based on preference and tolerability. Pregnancy, in renal transplanted females, is associated with physiologic changes that occur in pregnant women with native kidneys. Immunosuppressive medications during pregnancy, in a recipient with a single functioning kidney, expose the mother and fetus to unwanted complications. Some immunosuppressive drugs are contraindicated during pregnancy. Immunosuppressive medications should be discussed with renal transplant recipients who are planning to breastfeed their babies. In addition to antirejection drugs, other medications should be managed accordingly, whenever pregnancy is planned.

A Novel Hybrid Methodology for Anomaly Detection in Time Series

Numerous research methods have been developed to detect anomalies in the areas of security and risk analysis. In healthcare, there are numerous use cases where anomaly detection is relevant. For example, early detection of sepsis is one such use case. Early treatment of sepsis is cost effective and reduces the number of hospital days of patients in the ICU. There is no single procedure that is sufficient for sepsis diagnosis, and combinations of approaches are needed. Detecting anomalies in patient time series data could help speed the development of some decisions. However, our algorithm must be viewed as complementary to other approaches based on laboratory values and physician judgments. The focus of this work is to develop a hybrid method for detecting anomalies that occur, for example, in multidimensional medical signals, sensor signals, or other time series in business and nature. The novelty of our approach lies in the extension and combination of existing approaches: Statistics, Self Organizing Maps and Linear Discriminant Analysis in a unique and unprecedented way with the goal of identifying different types of anomalies in real-time measurement data and defining the point where the anomaly occurs. The proposed algorithm not only has the full potential to detect anomalies, but also to find real points where an anomaly starts.

Management of osteoporosis in patients with chronic kidney disease

Patients with CKD have a 4-fivefold higher rate of fractures. The incidence of fractures increases with deterioration of kidney function. The process of skeletal changes in CKD patients is characterized by compromised bone strength because of deterioration of bone quantity and/or quality. The fractures lead to a deleterious effect on the quality of life and higher mortality in patients with CKD. The pathogenesis of bone loss and fracture is complex and multi-factorial. Renal osteodystrophy, uremic milieu, drugs, and systemic diseases that lead to renal failure all contribute to bone damage in CKD patients. There is no consensus on the optimal diagnostic method of compromised bone assessment in patients with CKD. Bone quantity and mass can be assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Bone quality on the other side can be assessed by non-invasive methods such as trabecular bone score (TBS), high-resolution bone imaging methods, and invasive bone biopsy. Bone turnover markers can reflect bone remodeling, but some of them are retained by kidneys. Understanding the mechanism of bone loss is pivotal in preventing fracture in patients with CKD. Several non-pharmacological and therapeutic interventions have been reported to improve bone health. Controlling laboratory abnormalities of CKD-MBD is crucial. Anti-resorptive therapies are effective in improving BMD and reducing fracture risk, but there are uncertainties about safety and efficacy especially in advanced CKD patients. Accepting the prevalent of low bone turnover in patients with advanced CKD, the osteo-anabolics are possibly promising. Parathyroidectomy should be considered a last resort for intractable cases of renal hyperparathyroidism. There is a wide unacceptable gap in osteoporosis management in patients with CKD. This article is focusing on the updated management of CKD-MBD and osteoporosis in CKD patients. Chronic kidney disease deteriorates bone quality and quantity. The mechanism of bone loss mainly determines pharmacological treatment. DXA and QCT provide information about bone quantity, but assessing bone quality, by TBS, high-resolution bone imaging, invasive bone biopsy, and bone turnover markers, can guide us about the mechanism of bone loss.

Is de novo membranous nephropathy suggestive of alloimmunity in renal transplantation? A case report

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant nephrotic syndrome (PTNS) in a renal allograft carries a 48% to 77% risk of graft failure at 5 years if proteinuria persists. PTNS can be due to either recurrence of native renal disease or de novo glomerular disease. Its prognosis depends upon the underlying pathophysiology. We describe a case of post-transplant membranous nephropathy (MN) that developed 3 mo after kidney transplant. The patient was properly evaluated for pathophysiology, which helped in the management of the case.

CASE SUMMARY

This 22-year-old patient had chronic pyelonephritis. He received a living donor kidney, and human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) mismatching was zero. PTNS was discovered at the follow-up visit 3 mo after the transplant. Graft histopathology was suggestive of MN. In the past antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) might have been misinterpreted as de novo MN due to the lack of technologies available to make an accurate diagnosis. Some researchers have observed that HLA-DR is present on podocytes causing an anti-DR antibody deposition and development of de novo MN. They also reported poor prognosis in their series. Here, we excluded the secondary causes of MN. Immunohistochemistry was suggestive of IgG1 deposits that favoured the diagnosis of de novo MN. The patient responded well to an increase in the dose of tacrolimus and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor.

CONCLUSION

Exposure of hidden antigens on the podocytes in allografts may have led to subepithelial antibody deposition causing de novo MN.

Association of Nephrectomy of the Failed Renal Allograft With Outcome of the Future Transplant: A Systematic Review

Kidney allograft failure is a significant complication in kidney transplant recipients, and the surgical decision to perform allograft nephrectomy poses a strong dilemma because it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is a debate over the effect of allograft nephrectomy on the development of allosensitization and the impact on potential retransplantation. Moreover, the use of immunosuppression may contribute to antibody allosensitization as allograft nephrectomy and immunosuppression act jointly and interdependently toward antibody formation. Because more and more patients with kidney allograft failure are entering wait lists for repeat transplant procedures, a review of available evidence on the field is required. Here, we performed a literature search using multiple medical databases to identify relevant studies that assessed the effects of allograft nephrectomy on important retransplant endpoints such as allograft and patient survival; furthermore, secondary outcomes such as alloantibody sensitization were also evaluated. A total of 15 studies were identified; all were retrospective, single-center studies. The rate of allograft nephrectomy in patients with retransplant varied widely (from 20% to 80%). The average allograft nephrectomy rate in included studies was 43% (allograft nephrectomy number/number of repeat transplantations: 2351/5431). Most studies did not observe an allograft survival benefit after retransplant for patients with allograft nephrectomy with the exception of 4 studies that found worse allograft survival after allograft nephrectomy. Interestingly, 1 study found that, in the patient subgroup with early kidney allograft failure (<12 months posttransplant), allograft nephrectomy may be associated with better allograft survival. Available data suggested that allograft nephrectomy may be associated with a higher risk of increasing anti-HLA antibody levels. The quality of the included studies suffered from nonrandomized design, potential confounding, and small sample size. To conclude, further randomized controlled trials are required to delineate the role of allograft nephrectomy on retransplant outcomes.

Management of the Failing Kidney Transplant: Challenges and Solutions

The kidneys are the most transplanted organs, and the number of failed kidney transplants that require reinstitution of renal replacement therapy in patients is on the increase. Increased mortality has been noted in patients with failed grafts compared with transplant- naïve patients with chronic kidney disease who are treated with dialysis. Issues such as management of immunosuppression, the need for transplant nephrectomy, addressing the increased risk of cardiovascular events, malignancies, and infections are debatable and often based on individual or hospital practices. The optimal timing and modality of renal replacement therapy to be reinitiated are sometimes blurred, with considerable variations among physician practices. Guidelines are therefore needed to appropriately manage this special population of patients with the aim of improving outcomes. Here, our objective was to review the current practices in managing patients with failing kidney transplants so that recommendations can be made based on the available evidence.

Journey of a patient with scleroderma from renal failure up to kidney transplantation

The increased awareness of systemic sclerosis (SS) and its pathogenetic background made the management of this disease more amenable than previously thought. However, scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) is a rarely seen as an associated disorder that may involve 2%-15% of SS patients. Patients presented with earlier, rapidly progressing, diffuse cutaneous SS disease, mostly in the first 3-5 years after non-Raynaud clinical manifestations, are more vulnerable to develop SRC. SRC comprises a collection of acute, mostly symptomatic rise in blood pressure, elevation in serum creatinine concentrations, oliguria and thrombotic microangiopathy in almost 50% of cases. The advent of the antihypertensive angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in 1980 was associated with significant improvement in SRC prognosis. In a scleroderma patient maintained on regular dialysis; every effort should be exerted to declare any possible evidence of renal recovery. A given period of almost two years has been suggested prior to proceeding in a kidney transplant (KTx). Of note, SS patients on dialysis have the highest opportunity of renal recovery and withdrawal from dialysis as compared to other causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). KTx that is the best well-known therapeutic option for ESRD patients can also be offered to SS patients. Compared to other primary renal diseases, SS-related ESRD was considered for a long period of poor patient and allograft survivals. Pulmonary involvement in an SS patient is considered a strong post-transplant independent risk factor of death. Recurrence of SRC after transplantation has been observed in some patients. However, an excellent post-transplant patient and graft outcome have been recently reported. Consequently, the absence of extrarenal manifestations in an SS-induced ESRD patient can be accepted as a robust indicator for a successful KTx.

MO981OUTCOMES OF INTERLEUKIN-2 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST INDUCTION THERAPY IN STANDARD-RISK RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS MAINTAINED ON TACROLIMUS - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Background and Aims

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) antagonist has been used as an induction therapy in many centres in calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens. Tacrolimus has overwhelmingly replaced cyclosporine in the maintenance immunosuppressive protocols in many transplant centres. The aim of our study and meta-analysis is to explore the effect of IL-2 induction therapy on the rate of rejection and patient and graft survival in standard-risk renal transplant patients with tacrolimus-based maintenance immunotherapy. Secondary aims included assessment of the effect of IL-2 induction therapy on the risk of delayed graft function, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, and malignancy.

Method

We conducted a systematic review in different databases to identify studies and research work that assessed the effect of IL-2 antibody induction therapy on renal transplant outcomes. Inclusion criteria for our meta-analysis were all studies that compared IL-2 induction therapy with placebo or no induction therapy in standard-risk renal transplant recipients on tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. Data collected were the name of the first author, journal title, year of publication, country where the study was conducted, number of patients in the IL-2 induction therapy arm and in the placebo arm, number of patients who had biopsy-proven rejection and graft survival in each arm. A random effects model was used for the meta-analysis. We divided the studies included in this meta-analysis into two groups: Group A (included studies that used same dose of tacrolimus in both arms of each study) and Group B (included studies that compared patients who received induction therapy and low dose tacrolimus versus those who received no induction therapy and high dose of tacrolimus). Standard-risk renal transplant was defined as HLA mismatch &lt;5 and PRA&lt;50%.

Results

In group A, 11 studies were included (n=2886). IL2-RA induction therapy was not associated with significant differences in comparison to no induction therapy in terms of acute rejection rates (Risk Ratio=1.03, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] range: 0.84 - 1.26, I squared=0%, P=0.79), graft survival (Risk Ratio=1.15, 95% CI range: 0.82 to 1.62), delayed graft function (Risk Ratio=1.01, 95% CI range: 0.82 to 1.24), CMV infection (Risk Ratio =1.37, 95% CI range: 0.53 to 3.51) or malignancy (Risk Ratio=1.29, 95% CI range: 0.61 to 2.75). In group B, two studies were included (n=669). There was no difference between both arms in terms of acute rejection rates (Risk Ratio=0.62, with 95% CI range: 0.33 to 1.14) or graft survival (Risk Ratio=1, 95% CI range: 0.57 to 1.74) or delayed graft function (Risk Ratio=0.88, 95% CI range: 0.45 to 1.71).

Conclusion

IL2-RA induction therapy does not improve outcomes in patients maintained on tacrolimus-based immunotherapy in standard risk population. our results strengthen the argument for individualized medical therapy and the potential tailoring the immunosuppression regimes according to the actual patients, needs.

Outcomes of Interleukin-2 Receptor Antagonist Induction Therapy in Standard-Risk Renal Transplant Recipients Maintained on Tacrolimus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The additive benefit of interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2-RA) induction in standard-risk kidney transplant recipients, while maintained on tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy, is uncertain.

METHODS

We divided the studies included in this meta-analysis into 2 groups: group A (included studies that used same dose of tacrolimus in both arms of each study) and group B (included studies that compared patients who received induction therapy and low-dose tacrolimus vs. those who received no-induction therapy and high dose of tacrolimus).

RESULTS

In group A, 11 studies were included (n = 2,886). IL2-RA induction therapy was not associated with significant differences in comparison to no-induction therapy in terms of acute rejection rates at 6 months post-transplant (risk ratio = 1.12 and 95% confidence interval [CI] range: 0.94-1.35) or graft survival at 1 year post-transplant (risk ratio = 0.78 and 95% CI range: 0.45-1.36). In group B, 2 studies were included (n = 669). There was no difference between both arms in terms of acute rejection rates (risk ratio = 0.62, with 95% CI range: 0.33-1.14) or graft survival (risk ratio = 1 and 95% CI range: 0.57-1.74).

CONCLUSION

IL2-RA induction therapy does not improve outcomes in patients maintained on tacrolimus-based immunotherapy in standard-risk population.

Does steroid-free immunosuppression improve the outcome in kidney transplant recipients compared to conventional protocols?

Steroids continue to be the cornerstone of immune suppression since the early days of organ transplantation. Steroids are key component of induction protocols, maintenance therapy and in the treatment of various forms of rejection. Prolonged steroid use resulted in significant side effects on almost all the body organs owing to the presence of steroid receptors in most of the mammalian cells. Kidney allograft recipients had to accept the short and long term complications of steroids because of lack of effective alternatives. This situation changed with the intro-duction of newer and more effective immune suppression agents with a relatively more acceptable side effect profile. As a result, the clinicians have been contemplating if it is the time to abandon the unquestionable reliance on maintenance steroids in modern transplantation practice. This review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of various steroid-minimization approaches (steroid avoidance, early steroid withdrawal, and late steroid withdrawal) in kidney transplant recipients. A meticulous electronic search was conducted through the available data resources like SCOPUS, MEDLINE, and Liverpool University library e-resources. Relevant articles obtained through our search were included. A total number of 90 articles were eligible to be included in this review [34 randomised controlled trials (RCT) and 56 articles of other research modalities]. All articles were evaluating the safety and efficacy of various steroid-free approaches in comparison to maintenance steroids. We will cover only the RCT articles in this review. If used in right clinical context, steroid-free protocols proved to be comparable to steroid-based maintenance therapy. The appropriate approach should be tailored individually according to each recipient immuno-logical challenges and clinical condition.

Drug-Induced Myelosuppression in Kidney Transplant Patients

Renal transplant is considered the best therapeutic option for suitable patients with end-stage kidney failure. Hematological complications that occur after kidney transplant include posttransplant anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Severely persistent leukopenia and neutropenia events predispose patients to infection, including opportunistic infections. The mainstay tactic for such complications is to reduce the burden of the immunosuppression by the offending agent, but this tactic is associated with increased risk of acute rejection. Given the absence of laboratory investigations to specifically identify the culprit, a complete withdrawal of these agents may be the ultimate diagnostic option. Future therapeutic strategies, however, should focus on reducing the immunosuppressive burden, the introduction of less myelotoxic agents, early recognition, and prompt treatment of infectious episodes. This will help in the optimization of the myelopoietic function and normalization of the hematological profile, resulting in better allograft and patient survival.

Belatacept in renal transplantation in comparison to tacrolimus and molecular understanding of resistance pattern: Meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The T-cell costimulation blocking agent belatacept has been identified as a possible substitute for calcineurin inhibitors, however, no consensus has been established against its use over the standard care agent Tacrolimus.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of belatacept based maintenance immuno-suppressive regimens in comparison to tacrolimus in renal transplantion.

METHODS

We did extensive search of all the available literature comparing the role of belatacept to tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients by searching the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Crossref, Scopus, clinical trials registry on October 5, 2020.

RESULTS

The literature search identified four randomized controlled trials (n = 173 participants) comparing belatacept with tacrolimus. There was no significant difference in estimated renal function at 12 mo [mean difference 4.12 mL/min/1.73 m², confidence interval (CI): -2.18 to 10.42, P = 0.20]. Further, belatacept group was associated with significant increase in biopsy proven acute rejection [relative risk (RR) = 3.27, CI: 0.88 to 12.11, P = 0.08] and worse 12 mo allograft survival (RR = 4.51, CI: 1.23 to 16.58, P = 0.02). However, incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus was lower with belatacept at 12 mo (RR = 0.26, CI: 0.07 to 0.99, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The evidence reviewed in this meta-analysis suggested that belatacept-based maintenance immunosuppression regimens were associated with an increased risk allograft loss in renal transplant recipients with equivalent renal functioning against standard tacrolimus; however, observed significantly reduced new onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation incidence and lower serum low density lipid profile levels in belatacept group. In addition, the adaptation of belatacept in renal transplantation has been forestalled by increased rates of rejection and resistance owing to development of various effector memory T cells through, parallel differentiation and immunological plasticity.

Global Practices and Policies of Organ Transplantation and Organ Trafficking

OBJECTIVES

Organ trafficking has emerged worldwide as an important medical and ethical concern. In this study, we reviewed the literature presented on this matter to evaluate the global practices, ethical standards, and legal aspects of organ transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We adopted a qualitative study design to perform this study, which included conduct of a literature review. The main focus was organ transplantation.

RESULTS

Our review suggested a dire need to adopt ethical principles and implement equitable distribution of organs around the globe as per the respective need.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed to evaluate the role and status of organ recipients to create a much more organized environment for safe and effective implantation of evidence-based principles of clinical transplantation globally.

Identifying Early Extraperitoneal High-Volume Urine Leak Post Kidney Transplantation

Transplant clinicians need to be watchful of several potential surgical complications in the early post-transplant period, including haemorrhage, extraperitoneal urine leak, and lymphocele. While haemorrhage and extraperitoneal urine leak usually present in the early post kidney transplant period, lymphoceles usually present 2–6 weeks after transplantation. While the colour and volume of the drained fluid can give some indication of the problem, is not enough evidence for a confident urine leak diagnosis. Further investigations, such as serum biochemical parameter analysis of the drained fluid and ultrasonography, help to identify the true cause. This paper discusses how to identify high-volume extraperitoneal urine leaks in the early post kidney transplant period and considers the differential diagnoses. Different ureteroneocystostomy procedures, including the Lich–Grégoir, Politano–Leadbetter, and U-stitch techniques, are discussed and compared regarding complication rates (especially urine leak and haematuria). The authors also address the management of low- and high-volume extraperitoneal urine leak, the follow-up needed, and the impact of urine leak on graft and patient survival, length of hospital stay, and rate of hospital readmission.

COVID-19 in Renal Transplant Recipients: Case Series and a Brief Review of Current Evidence

By April 26, 2020, infections related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affected people from 210 countries and caused 203,818 reported deaths worldwide. A few studies discussed the outcome of COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients. This short series demonstrates our experience in managing COVID-19 disease in renal transplant patients in the absence of strong evidence. We report 8 cases of kidney transplant recipients infected with COVID-19 (median age = 48.5 years; range = 21–71 years), including 4 males and 4 females. The most frequently associated comorbidity was hypertension. The most common presenting features were fever and cough. The main radiological investigation was a portable chest X-ray. Other common features included lymphopenia, high C-reactive protein, and a very high ferritin level. Overall, 1 patient was managed as an outpatient, the remaining 7 required hospital admission, 1 of them referred to the intensive therapy unit. Management included supportive treatment (intravenous fluid therapy, monitoring renal function, and symptomatic treatment with or without ward-based oxygen therapy depending on oxygen saturation) and discontinuation of the antiproliferative immunosuppressive drugs. Seven patients recovered and discharged home to self-isolate. One patient required intensive care treatment and mechanical ventilation. Supportive treatment could be sufficient for the management or to be tried first. We also found that short hospital stay with self-isolation on discharge reduces the burden on the health service and protect the staff and the public.

MO010TREATMENT STRATEGIES OF ANTIBODY MEDIATED REJECTION IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Background and Aims

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) remains accountable for the majority of death-censored graft failure following the first year of kidney transplantation. Despite significant advances in transplant immunology and immunosuppressive agents, long-term graft survival has not improved significantly. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the optimal treatment strategy for AMR by investigating the effect on kidney function, proteinuria, donor specific antibody (DSA), histopathology, graft survival, adverse events and patient survival.

Method

MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched following the PRISMA guidelines. Any kidney transplant study conducted between 1997-2018, which investigated treatment strategies for biopsy-proven AMR, and reported at least one of the following outcomes; serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), proteinuria, DSA, histopathology scores, graft survival, adverse events and/or patient survival were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomised controlled studies.

Results

Our analysis identified a total of 27 studies consisting of 6 RCTs and 21 non-randomised controlled studies. Together these studies included 1,237 transplant recipients; 748 patients with acute AMR (AAMR) and 489 with chronic AMR (CAMR). Meta-analysis identified significantly better 1-year graft survival in patients with AAMR when treated with Rituximab in addition to plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) compared to plasmapheresis and IVIG alone [risk ratio (RR): 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27-0.86, Z=2.46, P=0.01, I2=0%] (Fig-1A). Pooled analysis of GFR in the AAMR group was not possible due to insufficient data. There was no significant difference in the GFR at 6-12 months after treatment of CAMR with IVIG plus Rituximab compared to no treatment [mean difference: 0.36, 95% CI: -11.80-12.52, Z=0.06, P=0.95, I2=89%] (Fig-1B). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the 1-year graft survival after treatment of CAMR with IVIG plus Rituximab compared to no treatment [RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.42-1.40, Z=0.86, P=0.39, I2=9%] (Fig-1C). Late diagnosis of AMR and established transplant glomerulopathy seem associated with graft dysfunction and poor prognosis. Additionally, declining GFR and proteinuria seem to impact considerably on the overall outcome of the graft. Pooled analysis of proteinuria, DSA titres, and histopathology scores was not possible due to insufficient data. Similarly, pooled analysis of adverse events was not possible; however, these therapeutic strategies were generally well tolerated and associated with excellent patient survival throughout the included studies. Novel therapeutic approaches seem promising, but currently there is insufficient evidence for their routine use in AMR. The risk of bias ranged between low-risk to high-risk throughout the included RCTs and between moderate-risk to critical-risk amongst the non-randomised controlled studies.

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis outlines the treatment of AMR in kidney transplantation using the current best available evidence. We identified low-quality evidence in favour of treatment with combined plasmapheresis, IVIG and Rituximab in AAMR. Treatment of established CAMR does not seem advantageous in terms of graft function and survival. Additionally, the treatment of AMR is particularly heterogeneous between transplant centres, reflecting the lack of good quality evidence to guide practice. RCTs conducted via multicentre collaboration are urgently required to establish the optimal therapeutic strategies and validate models for predicting therapeutic response in AMR.

P1649IS BK VIRUS CARCINOGENIC?!

Background and Aims

The role of polyomaviruses (PyV) in malignancy is controversial, this can be demonstrated in three ways; Firstly, hit and run mechanism where polyomaviruses contribute to the early phases of oncogenic progression. The second way, where PyV act as a passenger as polyomaviruses neither necessary nor contribute to the oncogenic progression. The third way, where PyV acts as (bystander) as PyV is not related to the malignancy, but PyV could be detected in the anatomically connected sites or neighbouring cells. BKV has been classified as a possible carcinogenic to humans (2b) as there is sufficient evidence that it is carcinogenic to animals, however, BKV carcinogenicity evaluation to humans was inadequate. There are inconsistent data regarding the contribution of BKV to tumors that occur in both animals and humans.

Method

Retrospective analyses of 492 consecutive renal transplant recipients in a single-center, 2010-2018. Data Source: prospectively managed electronic patient records. Malignancy data in both control and BKV infected groups were assessed.

Results

A total of 492 cases were studied, were categorized into 2 groups the BKV infected group (n:73) patients and BKV non-infected group (n: 419) patients, then an assessment of different malignancies in both groups. The BKV infected group had 15 cases out of 73 who had malignancy, while the BKV non-infected group had 28 cases out of 419 totally (Table 1). The association between malignancy in BKV was statistically significant (P-value of 0.038). Moreover, the risk factors involved in the development of malignancy in renal transplant recipients were older age, BK virus infection and maintenance immunosuppression agents (Table 2). Lastly, Logistic regression analysis was used to assess predictors of malignancy among renal transplant recipients. For every one-year increase in age among renal transplant recipients, the odds of having a malignancy increase by 4.6% (p=0.003). Meanwhile, there is a 4 times increase in the odds of having malignancy for recipients who are BK virus-positive vs. those who are BK virus negative (p=0.001). Furthermore, there is a 10 times increase in the odds of having malignancy for recipients who are on sirolimus as a maintenance immunosuppressant vs. those who are on TAC/PRED/MMF (p=0.007).

Conclusion

Our study highlights the statistically significant correlation between BK virus infection and the development of malignancy in renal transplant recipients. However, statistical correlation doesn`t mean causation which makes the potential oncogenic role of BKV is unclear. Also, there is increased reporting of malignancy in patients infected with BKV. Increased vigilance is required for early detection of malignancy in patients infected with BKV not only the patients who are heavily immunosuppressed.

Relationship between rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin and development of PTLD and its aggressive form in renal transplant population

Introduction

The aim of our study is to explore the relationship of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (R-ATG) on development of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) and its aggressive forms (monomorphic PTLD and Hodgkin lymphoma) in renal transplant recipients.

Methodology

All patients diagnosed with PTLD post-renal transplant in the United States’ Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network from 2003 till 2013 and followed up till 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Multi-variable logistic regression analysis assessed association of R-ATG to development of PTLD and its aggressive form.

Results

Risk of developing PTLD post renal transplant is 1.35%. In comparison to interleukin-2 blocker induction therapy, R-ATG is associated with increased risk of development of PTLD (Odds Ratio = 1.48, confidence interval ranges from 1.04 to 2.11, p = .02) and is associated with higher risk of development of aggressive PTLD (Odds Ratio = 1.83, confidence interval ranges from 1.001 to 3.34, p = .04).

Conclusion

We conclude that R-ATG induction is associated with a higher risk of PTLD and its aggressive form (monomorphic PTLD and Hodgkin lymphoma). Careful monitoring for development of PTLD in renal transplant recipients receiving R-ATG induction therapy is advised.

Effect of Interleukin-2 Receptor Antibody Induction Therapy on Survival in Renal Transplant Patients Receiving Tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess outcomes of interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor blocker induction therapy on allograft and patients' outcomes in standard risk recipients in the tacrolimus era, analysing data form the British Renal Transplant Registry.

METHODS

The study population involved all standard-risk renal transplant patients from 2000 till 2015 who were registered in the UK transplant registry and followed up till May 2018. Standard risk transplants were defined as patients with <2DR mismatch, calculated reaction frequency <20%, live donors or donors after brain death and patients with no previous renal transplantation transplant. We used inverse probability weights to adjust different covariates between the groups. Cox regression analysis for adjusted data and treatment effects model were used to assess outcomes.

RESULTS

In all, 3,597 renal transplant patients were included in the study. Two groups were identified; induction group (n = 2,858) which included patients who received IL-2 receptor blocker induction therapy and the no-induction group (n = 739). There was no significant difference between both groups in terms of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) rate at 1-year post-transplant (correlation co-efficient = 1.224, 95% CI ranges from -0.347 to 2.796). Average eGFR was 59.922 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the induction group (SD 29.171) and 64.557 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the no-induction groups (SD 46.763). There was no significant difference between both groups regarding graft survival at 5 years post-transplant (hazard ratio [HR] 0.944, 95% CI ranges from 0.599 to 1.485, p = 0.804), patient survival at 5 years post-transplant (HR 0.809, 95% CI ranges from 0.477 to1.372, p = 0.433).

CONCLUSION

In the standard risk renal transplant population, the IL2 receptor blocker induction regimen does not affect eGFR at 1 year or renal and graft outcomes at 5 years.

Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) versus IL-2 receptor antagonist induction therapies in tacrolimus-based immunosuppression era: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this meta-analysis is to explore the effect of IL-2RA vs rATG on the rate of acute rejection, post-transplant infections, and graft as well as patient's survival in standard- and high-risk renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus-based maintenance immunotherapy.

METHODS

Random effects model was the method used for identifying risk difference. Confidence interval including the value 1 was used as evidence for statistically significant risk difference. Heterogeneity was assessed using Der Simonian analysis. Heterogeneity was evident at the level of P value < 0.1 RESULTS: The random effects model showed no significant differences in both acute rejection rates between IL-2RA and rATG induction therapies with relative risk of 1.24 graft survival with relative risk 0.90. Patient survival also did not demonstrate any significant difference with a relative risk of 1.19. Random effects for CMV infection showed a lesser tendency for CMV infection in IL-2RA group compared to ATG group the with a relative risk of 0.73.In subgroup analysis, the random effects model for acute rejection rates in high-risk transplants showed a higher risk of acute rejection in the IL-2RA group compared to rATG (relative risk equals 1.55) In standard-risk transplants, there were no significant differences between both groups with relative risk equals 1.02 CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in patient and graft survival when using IL-2RA vs rATG with the tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression era. However, subgroup analysis showed less incidence of rejection in high-risk renal transplant recipient's population using rATG compared to IL-2RA.

Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders: Current concepts and future therapeutic approaches

Transplant recipients are vulnerable to a higher risk of malignancy after solid organ transplantation and allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) include a wide spectrum of diseases ranging from benign proliferation of lymphoid tissues to frank malignancy with aggressive behavior. Two main risk factors of PTLD are: Firstly, the cumulative immunosuppressive burden, and secondly, the oncogenic impact of the Epstein-Barr virus. The latter is a key pathognomonic driver of PTLD evolution. Over the last two decades, a considerable progress has been made in diagnosis and therapy of PTLD. The treatment of PTLD includes reduction of immunosuppression, rituximab therapy, either isolated or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents, adoptive therapy, surgical intervention, antiviral therapy and radiotherapy. In this review we shall discuss the prevalence, clinical clues, prophylactic measures as well as the current and future therapeutic strategies of this devastating disorder.

Pancreatic transplantation: Brief review of the current evidence

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for management of end-stage renal disease. However, in diabetic patients, the underlying metabolic disturbance will persist and even may get worse after isolated kidney transplantation. Pancreatic transplantation in humans was first introduced in 1966. The initial outcome was disappointing. However, this was changed after the improvement of surgical techniques together with better patient selection and the availability of potent and better-tolerated immune-suppression like cyclosporine and induction antibodies. Combined kidney and pancreas transplantation will not only solve the problem of organ failure, but it will also stabilise or even reverse the metabolic complications of diabetes. Combined kidney and pancreas transplantation have the best long term outcome in diabetic cases with renal failure. Nevertheless, at the cost of an initial increase in morbidity and risk of mortality. Other transplantation options include pancreas after kidney transplantation and islet cell transplantation. We aim by this work to explore various options which can be offered to a diabetic patient with advanced chronic kidney disease. Our work will provide a simplified, yet up-to-date information regarding the different management options for those diabetic chronic kidney failure patients.

Implication of interleukin-2 receptor antibody induction therapy in standard risk renal transplant in the tacrolimus era: a meta-analysis

Background

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) antagonist has been used as an induction therapy in many centres in calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens. Tacrolimus has overwhelmingly replaced cyclosporine in the maintenance immunosuppressive protocols in many transplant centres. The aim of our study and meta-analysis is to explore the effect of IL-2 induction therapy on the rate of rejection and patient and graft survival in standard-risk renal transplant patients with tacrolimus-based maintenance immunotherapy. Secondary aims included assessment of the effect of IL-2 induction therapy on creatinine change and the risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review in different databases to identify studies and research work that assessed the effect of IL-2 antibody induction therapy on renal transplant outcomes. Inclusion criteria for our meta-analysis were all studies that compared IL-2 induction therapy with placebo or no induction therapy in standard-risk renal transplant recipients on tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. Data collected were the name of the first author, journal title, year of publication, country where the study was conducted, number of patients in the IL-2 induction therapy arm and in the placebo arm, number of patients who had biopsy-proven rejection and graft survival in each arm. A random effects model was used for the meta-analysis.

Results

Of the 470 articles found in different databases, 7 were included in the meta-analysis. Forest plot analysis for rate of rejection during the follow-up period post-transplant showed no significant difference between the groups. There was no evidence of heterogenicity between included studies (I ² = 21.8%, P = 0.27). The overall risk difference was -0.02 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.05-0.01]. A random effects meta-analysis for patient and graft survival was performed using forest plot analysis and showed no significant effect of IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) antibody induction on patient or graft survival compared with placebo. The overall risk difference was -0.01 (95% CI -0.04-0.01) and 0.00 (95% CI -0.00-0.01), respectively. Three of the included studies showed no effect of basiliximab on creatinine change, two showed no effect on risk of CMV infection and two showed less risk of post-transplant diabetes in the basiliximab group.

Conclusion

IL-2R antibody induction therapy has no significant effect on the rate of rejection or patient or graft survival in standard-risk renal transplant recipients on tacrolimus-based maintenance immunotherapy. More randomized controlled studies are needed.

Perinephric transplant fluid collection approach and management

Renal transplant is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease. Perirenal fluid collections are a common surgical complication postrenal transplant that may lead to early graft loss, considerable morbidity, and excess financial loss, if not diagnosed and managed early. The causes of posttransplant fluid collections are urinary leak, lymphocele, hematoma, and seroma, which can be further complicated by abscess formation if becomes infected. Urine leak is considered the most common urological complication postrenal transplant. Diagnosis can be made by biochemical analysis of the fluid drainage with the simultaneous comparison to that of serum. Radiological imaging is also essential for confirming the diagnosis of urinary leak that may not necessarily identify the site of the leak. The management of urinary leak is usually surgical unless the leak is small. The choice of surgery depends on the location of the leak, the vascularization of the involved ureter, and the presence of any complications caused by the leak. This article reviews the differential diagnoses of perirenal fluid collections in postrenal transplant period and focuses on the clinical assessment of urinoma and management options according to the latest evidence-based medicine.

Positive Luminex and negative flow cytometry in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The presence of pre-formed donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in kidney transplantation is associated with worse overall outcomes compared with DSA-negative transplantation. A positive complement-dependant cytotoxic crossmatch presents a high immunological risk, while a negative flow cytometry crossmatch is at the lower end of the risk spectrum. Yet, the presence of low-level DSA detected by Luminex alone, that is, positive Luminex and negative flow (PLNF) cytometry crossmatch lacks robust scientific exploration. In this systematic review and pooled analysis, we investigate the glomerular filtration rate, acute rejection (AR), graft survival and patient survival of PLNF transplants compared with DSA-negative transplants. Our analysis identified seven retrospective studies consisting of 429 PLNF transplants and 10 677 DSA-negative transplants. Pooled analysis identified no significant difference in the incidence of AR at 1 year [relative risk (RR) = 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90–2.02, Z = 1.46, P = 0.14, I2 = 0%], graft failure at 1 year (RR = 1.66, 95% CI 0.94–2.94, Z = 1.75, P = 0.08, I2 = 23%), graft failure at 5 years (RR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.90–1.87, Z = 1.38, P = 0.17, I2 = 0%), patient mortality at 1 year (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.31–2.56, Z = 0.22, P = 0.82, I2 = 0%) and patient mortality at 5 years (RR = 1.76, 95% CI 0.48–6.48, Z = 0.85, P = 0.39, I2 = 61%). Pooled analysis of graft function was not possible due to insufficient data. Current evidence suggests that low-level DSA detected by Luminex alone does not pose significant risk at least in the short–medium term. Considering the shortage of kidney transplants and the ever-increasing waiting time, the avoidance of PLNF transplants may be unwarranted especially in patients who have been enlisted for a long time.

Complement-mediated renal diseases after kidney transplantation - current diagnostic and therapeutic options in de novo and recurrent diseases

For decades, kidney diseases related to inappropriate complement activity, such as atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy (a subtype of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis), have mostly been complicated by worsened prognoses and rapid progression to end-stage renal failure. Alternative complement pathway dysregulation, whether congenital or acquired, is well-recognized as the main driver of the disease process in these patients. The list of triggers include: surgery, infection, immunologic factors, pregnancy and medications. The advent of complement activation blockade, however, revolutionized the clinical course and outcome of these diseases, rendering transplantation a viable option for patients who were previously considered as non-transplantable cases. Several less-costly therapeutic lines and likely better efficacy and safety profiles are currently underway. In view of the challenging nature of diagnosing these diseases and the long-term cost implications, a multidisciplinary approach including the nephrologist, renal pathologist and the genetic laboratory is required to help improve overall care of these patients and draw the optimum therapeutic plan.

Thrombotic microangiopathy after renal transplantation: Current insights in de novo and recurrent disease

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is one of the most devastating sequalae of kidney transplantation. A number of published articles have covered either de novo or recurrent TMA in an isolated manner. We have, hereby, in this article endeavored to address both types of TMA in a comparative mode. We appreciate that de novo TMA is more common and its prognosis is poorer than recurrent TMA; the latter has a genetic background, with mutations that impact disease behavior and, consequently, allograft and patient survival. Post-transplant TMA can occur as a recurrence of the disease involving the native kidney or as de novo disease with no evidence of previous involvement before transplant. While atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome is a rare disease that results from complement dysregulation with alternative pathway overactivity, de novo TMA is a heterogenous set of various etiologies and constitutes the vast majority of post-transplant TMA cases. Management of both diseases varies from simple maneuvers, e.g., plasmapheresis, drug withdrawal or dose modification, to lifelong complement blockade, which is rather costly. Careful donor selection and proper recipient preparation, including complete genetic screening, would be a pragmatic approach. Novel therapies, e.g., purified products of the deficient genes, though promising in theory, are not yet of proven value.

Early urological complications after kidney transplantation: An overview

Urological complications, especially urine leaks, remain the most common type of surgical complication in the early post-transplant period. Despite major advances in the field of transplantation, a small minority of kidney transplants are still being lost due to urological problems. Many of these complications can be traced back to the time of retrieval and implantation. Serial ultrasound examination of the transplanted graft in the early post-operative period is of key importance for early detection. The prognosis is generally excellent if recognized and managed in a timely fashion. The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss the different presentations, compare various ureterovesical anastomosis techniques and provide a basic overview for the management of post-transplant urological complications.

Utility of central venous pressure measurement in renal transplantation: Is it evidence based?

Adequate intravenous fluid therapy is essential in renal transplant recipients to ensure a good allograft perfusion. Central venous pressure (CVP) has been considered the cornerstone to guide the fluid therapy for decades; it was the only available simple tool worldwide. However, the revolutionary advances in assessing the dynamic preload variables together with the availability of new equipment to precisely measure the effect of intravenous fluids on the cardiac output had created a question mark on the future role of CVP. Despite the critical role of fluid therapy in the field of transplantation. There are only a few clinical studies that compared the CVP guided fluid therapy with the other modern techniques and their relation to the outcome in renal transplantation. Our work sheds some light on the available published data in renal transplantation, together with data from other disciplines evaluating the utility of central venous pressure measurement. Although lager well-designed studies are still required to consolidate the role of new techniques in the field of renal transplantation, we can confidently declare that the new techniques have the advantages of providing more accurate haemodynamic assessment, which results in a better patient outcome.

Vaccination practices in End Stage Renal Failure and Renal Transplantation; Review of current guidelines and recommendations

Due to the increased burden of infectious complications following solid organ transplantation, vaccination against common pathogens is a hugely important area of discussion and application in clinical practice. Reduction in infectious complications will help to reduce morbidity and mortality post-transplantation. Immunisation history is invaluable in the work-up of potential recipients. Knowledge of the available vaccines and their use in transplant recipients, donors and healthcare providers is vital in the delivery of quality care to transplant recipients. This article will serve as an aide-memoire to transplant physicians and health care professionals involved in managing transplant recipients as it provides an overview of different types of vaccines, timing of vaccination, vaccines contraindicated post solid organ transplantation and travel vaccines.

Role of crossmatch testing when Luminex-SAB is negative in renal transplantation

The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system plays an important role in the acceptance of renal graft. Long and better graft survival has been reported in patients with HLA-identical siblings and a nonreactive cytotoxicity assay (CDC). New methods of HLA-typing and anti-HLA antibody detection techniques such as flow cytometry, solid-phase immunoassays, or antigen bead assays have further improved the outcomes of renal transplant recipients. In the present review, the explicit details of these methodologies are discussed in detail.

Urine Leak After Kidney Transplant: A Review of the Literature

Although they are not common, urologic complications after renal transplant are associated with risk of graft loss. Fluid collection during the postoperative period can be caused by urine leak or lymph leak of seroma. Biochemical analysis of the drained liquid is essential and should be compared with a concomitant serum sample. Surgical exploration is indicated if suspected urine leak is significant. Reimplantation of the ureter to the bladder can be challenging if there is extensive ureteral necrosis due to compromised vascularization.

De novo glomerular diseases after renal transplantation: How is it different from recurrent glomerular diseases?

The glomerular diseases after renal transplantation can occur de novo, i.e., with no relation to the native kidney disease, or more frequently occur as a recurrence of the original disease in the native kidney. There may not be any difference in clinical features and histological pattern between de novo glomerular disease and recurrence of original glomerular disease. However, structural alterations in transplanted kidney add to dilemma in diagnosis. These changes in architecture of histopathology can happen due to: (1) exposure to the immunosuppression specifically the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI); (2) in vascular and tubulointerstitial alterations as a result of antibody mediated or cell-mediated immunological onslaught; (3) post-transplant viral infections; (4) ischemia-reperfusion injury; and (5) hyperfiltration injury. The pathogenesis of the de novo glomerular diseases differs with each type. Stimulation of B-cell clones with subsequent production of the monoclonal IgG, particularly IgG3 subtype that has higher affinity to the negatively charged glomerular tissue, is suggested to be included in PGNMID pathogenesis. De novo membranous nephropathy can be seen after exposure to the cryptogenic podocyte antigens. The role of the toxic effects of CNI including tissue fibrosis and the hemodynamic alterations may be involved in the de novo FSGS pathophysiology. The well-known deleterious effects of HCV infection and its relation to MPGN disease are frequently reported. The new concepts have emerged that demonstrate the role of dysregulation of alternative complement pathway in evolution of MPGN that led to classifying into two subgroups, immune complex mediated MPGN and complement-mediated MPGN. The latter comprises of the dense deposit disease and the C3 GN disease. De novo C3 disease is rather rare. Prognosis of de novo diseases varies with each type and their management continues to be empirical to a large extent.

Recurrence of primary glomerulonephritis: Review of the current evidence

In view of the availability of new immunosuppression strategies, the recurrence of allograft glomerulonephritis (GN) are reported to be increasing with time post transplantation. Recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis of the GN recurrent disease provided a better chance to develop new strategies to deal with the GN recurrence. Recurrent GN diseases manifest with a variable course, stubborn behavior, and poor response to therapy. Some types of GN lead to rapid decline of kidney function resulting in a frustrating return to maintenance dialysis. This subgroup of aggressive diseases actually requires intensive efforts to ascertain their pathogenesis so that strategy could be implemented for better allograft survival. Epidemiology of native glomerulonephritis as the cause of end-stage renal failure and subsequent recurrence of individual glomerulonephritis after renal transplantation was evaluated using data from various registries, and pathogenesis of individual glomerulonephritis is discussed. The following review is aimed to define current protocols of the recurrent primary glomerulonephritis therapy.

Transplant Renal Vein Thrombosis

Transplant renal vein thrombosis usually occurs early after surgery with a reported prevalence of 0.1% to 4.2%. It is a devastating event that ultimately leads to graft loss in almost all cases. There are many predisposing factors related to donor, recipient, surgery, and immunosuppression, with mechanical factors being considered the most common causes of transplant renal vein thrombosis. The clinical manifestations of acute renal vein thrombosis are nonspecific and are not dissimilar to the features of urine leak, urinary obstruction, or severe acute rejection. The diagnosis of transplant renal vein thrombosis depends on a high index of clinical suspicion and duplex ultrasonographic scans. Although venography remains the criterion standard, this procedure is invasive and nephrotoxic, due to use of ionizing contrast agents and also due to exposure to ionizing radiation. There are 2 therapies that have been described in the literature for salvaging a renal allograft with transplant renal vein thrombosis: thrombolytic therapy and surgical thrombectomy. The usual end result is renal allograft.