Endometrial receptivity array: Clinical application

Personalized embryo transfer guided by rsERT with hourly precision improves pregnancy outcomes in patients with a receptive window of implantation: a pilot study

PURPOSE

To investigate whether personalized embryo transfer (pET) predicted by a modified RNA-sequencing-based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) model can improve intrauterine pregnancy rate (IPR) in patients with a receptive window of implantation (WOI).

DESIGN

A retrospective pilot study was conducted in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Central South University, from January 2018 to December 2023. A total of 524 patients with receptive WOI results from rsERT were assigned into two groups based on whether they underwent conventional embryo transfer (conventional ET) or pET. Patients in the conventional ET were matched with those in the pET group at a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Before PSM, the IPR (55.73% vs. 46.19%, P = 0.032) and implantation rate (IR) (47.51% vs. 34.03%, P = 0.000) in the pET group were significantly higher than that in the conventional ET group. However, the number and types of transferred embryos differed significantly between the two groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, IPR (57.38% vs. 44.81, P = 0.016) and IR (46.81% vs. 33.10%, P = 0.001) remained significantly higher in the pET group compared to the conventional ET group. The implantation failure rate was significantly lower in the pET group compared to controls (42.62% vs. 55.19%, P = 0.016). Additionally, the multiple-pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the pET group compared to the conventional ET group (10.29% vs. 1.68%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with receptive WOI results could benefit from the receptivity-timed pET predicted by the newly refined rsERT. These findings provide a basis for future research in precision medicine for embryo transfer.

Precise hourly personalized embryo transfer significantly improves clinical outcomes in patients with repeated implantation failure

Purpose

This study investigated whether RNA-Seq-based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT)-which provides precision for the optimal hour of the window of implantation (WOI)-can improve clinical outcomes of frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles in patients with a history of repeated implantation failure (RIF).

Methods

Patients with a history of RIF who received at least one autologous high-quality blastocyst during the subsequent FET cycle were retrospectively enrolled and divided into two groups: rsERT and FET, comprising patients who underwent rsERT-guided pET (n=115) and standard FET without rsERT (n=272), respectively.

Results

In the rsERT group, 39.1% (45/115) of patients were receptive. rsERT patients showed a higher probability of achieving both positive human chorionic gonadotropin (63.5% vs. 51.5%, P=0.03) and clinical pregnancy (54.8% vs. 38.6%, P=0.003) rates. In subgroup analysis, rsERT patients with non-receptive results had higher clinical pregnancy rates than patients undergoing FET (58.6% vs. 38.6%, P=0.003). rsERT patients with receptive results guided by rsERT with a precise WOI time had higher, although non-significant, clinical pregnancy rates (48.9% vs. 38.6%, P=0.192) than patients who underwent standard-time FET.

Conclusion

Hourly precise rsERT can significantly improve the probability of achieving clinical pregnancy in patients with RIF, especially in those with non-receptive rsERT results.

An Approach to Improve Endometrial Receptivity: Is It Beneficial to Flush The Uterine Cavity with Follicular Fluid and Granulosa Cells? A Phase III Randomised Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The follicular fluid (FF) of mature oocytes contains a high concentration of growth factors and cytokines that have the potential to influence implantation in either a paracrine or autocrine manner. During the physiological processes of ovulation, FF enters the fallopian tubes in conjunction with the oocyte. The purpose of this study is to evaluate implantation and clinical pregnancy rates following uterine flushing with FF and granulosa cells in infertile women with moderate male factor infertility after ovum retrieval for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This phase III randomised clinical trial enrolled 140 women with moderate male factor infertility who intended to undergo ICSI at Royan Infertility Clinic (Tehran, Iran). A computer-generated program and opaque sealed envelopes were used to randomly allocate patients to either an intervention group (n=70) or a control group (n=70). Participants in the intervention group received 2 ml of clear FF (without blood contamination) from 2 to 3 dominant follicles after oocyte retrieval. The control group only underwent uterine cavity catheterisation.

RESULTS

The intervention group had a clinical pregnancy rate of 38.5% (25/65) compared to the control group [42.9% (27/63); P=0.719] and an implantation rate of 24.1% compared to the control group (27%; P=0.408). These rates did not differ between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups in terms of pregnancy-related complications-ectopic pregnancy, blighted ovum or anembryonic pregnancy, and abortion.

CONCLUSION

Uterine cavity flushing with FF from mature follicles following oocyte retrieval had no effect, either positively or negatively, on clinical pregnancy or implantation rates in women with moderate male factor infertility (registration number: NCT04077970).

Current Status of Ovarian and Endometrial Biomarkers in Predicting ART Outcomes

This review evaluates the role of ovarian and endometrial biomarkers in predicting outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART). It highlights established ovarian biomarkers such as the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), alongside emerging ones like growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9), bone morphogenetic protein 15 (BMP15), connexin, and granulosa cell gene profiles. Additionally, the paper explores endometrial biomarkers such as ERA, BCL6, and immune markers, as well as the potential for genomic and proteomic technologies in customizing implantation. It concludes that while many of these biomarkers show promise, their clinical integration requires rigorous research and validation to confirm their safety and utility in ART.

MiR-135a-5p regulates window of implantation by suppressing pinopodes development and decidualization of endometrial stromal cells

PURPOSE

The window of implantation (WOI) is a brief period during which the endometrium is receptive to embryo implantation. This study investigated the relationship between miR-135a-5p and endometrial receptivity.

METHODS

Peripheral blood was collected on the day of ovulation and the 5th day after ovulation for high-throughput sequencing from women who achieved clinical pregnancy through natural cycle frozen embryo transfer. RT-qPCR assessed miR-135a-5p expression in the endometrium tissue or cells during the mouse implantation window or decidualization. Scanning electron microscopy was utilized to observe pinopode morphology and quantity in mice overexpressing miR-135a-5p during the WOI. Human endometrial stromal cells (HESC) and artificial induction of mouse uterine decidualization were used to explore whether miR-135a-5p overexpression inhibits decidualization by regulating HOXA10 and BMPR2. Furthermore, the impact of miR-135a-5p on HESC proliferation and HTR8/SVneo invasion was explored.

RESULTS

A total of 54 women were enrolled in the study. bioinformatics analysis and animal models demonstrated that miR-135a-5p was significantly downregulated during the WOI, and its high expression can lead to abnormal pregnancy outcomes. Overexpression of miR-135a-5p resulted in the absence of pinopode in mouse endometrial tissue during the WOI. High miR-135a-5p levels were found to potentially inhibit endometrial tissue decidualization by downregulating HOXA10 and BMPR2 expression. Finally, CEBPD was identified as a potential regulator of miR-135a-5p, which would explain the decreased miR-135a-5p expression during the WOI.

CONCLUSION

MiR-135a-5p expression is significantly downregulated during the WOI. High miR-135a-5p levels suppress pinopode development and endometrial tissue decidualization through HOXA10 and BMPR2, contributing to inadequate endometrial receptivity.

A Comprehensive Review of the Endometrial Receptivity Array in Euploid Embryo Transfer Cycles

The Endometrial Receptivity Array (ERA) is a revolutionary molecular diagnostic tool that determines the optimal timing for embryo transfer by analyzing the gene expression profile of endometrial tissue. This comprehensive review examines the significance and application of ERA in euploid embryo transfer cycles, where the implantation of embryos with the correct number of chromosomes is critical for achieving successful pregnancy outcomes. This review underscores its role in enhancing implantation rates and reducing pregnancy loss by assessing the evolution, methodology, clinical applications, efficacy, and challenges associated with ERA. Key findings highlight ERA's superior accuracy in identifying the window of implantation compared to traditional methods, resulting in improved clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles. Despite its benefits, the review acknowledges challenges such as cost, accessibility, and the need for standardization. Recommendations for clinical practice emphasize the integration of ERA into routine ART protocols, comprehensive patient counseling, and the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration. The review outlines promising prospects, including technological advancements to make ERA more cost-effective, the development of refined gene expression profiles, and the potential integration with other emerging ART technologies. Further research directions include long-term studies on the outcomes of ERA-guided pregnancies and exploring its application in cases of recurrent implantation failure and unexplained infertility. Overall, ERA represents a significant advancement in reproductive medicine, offering a personalized approach to embryo transfer timing that can significantly improve the success rates of euploid embryo transfers.

Exploring the effectiveness of endometrial receptivity array and immune profiling in patients with multiple implantation failure：A retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA), endometrial immune profiling, and a combination of both in improving the pregnancy outcomes for multiple implantation failure patients. According to patients' willingness, 1429 women who incurred at least two or more consecutive implantation failures in IVF/ICSI treatment opted for frozen embryo transfer and were divided into four groups: 'No test', 'Immune Profiling', 'ERA' and 'ERA+ Immune Profiling'. Women in three test groups underwent timed endometrial biopsy for ERA, immune profiling, a combination of both. We observed the overall incidence rates of the displaced window of implantation (WOI) and endometrial immune dysregulation were 75.14% and 79.29%, respectively. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), our data revealed that the 'ERA' and 'ERA + Immune Profiling' groups demonstrated significantly higher rates of biochemical, clinical, ongoing pregnancy, and implantation compared to the 'No test' group (p < 0.01). The 'Immune Profiling' group showed a higher implantation rate compared to 'No test' group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, when comparing three test groups, the 'ERA + Immune Profiling' group exhibited notably higher rates of clinical and ongoing pregnancy compared to the 'Immune Profiling' group (p < 0.017). However, there was no association between endometrial immune profiling and ERA phases, and their results did not differ between embryo implantation and non-implantation in these patients. Our findings underline the increased implantation rates by use of ERA and endometrial immune profiling in patients with multiple implantation failure, either individually or corporately. Moreover, a combination of both could improve their pregnancy outcomes significantly.

Personalized embryo transfer guided by rsERT improves pregnancy outcomes in patients with repeated implantation failure

Introduction

Embryo implantation requires synchronous communication between the embryo and maternal endometrium. Inadequate maternal endometrial receptivity is one of the principal causes for embryo implantation failure [especially repeated implantation failure (RIF)] when biopsied good-quality euploid embryos are transferred. An RNA-seq-based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) was previously established to precisely guide successful embryo implantation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of personalized embryo transfer (pET) via rsERT on the clinical outcomes in patients with RIF.

Methods

A total of 155 patients with RIF were included in the present retrospective study and were divided into two groups: 60 patients who underwent rsERT and pET (Group rsERT) and 95 patients who underwent standard frozen embryo transfer (FET) without rsERT (Group FET). Reproductive outcomes were compared for patients who underwent rsERT-guided pET and standard FET.

Results

Forty percent (24/60) of the patients who underwent rsERT were receptive, and the remaining 60% (36/60) were non-receptive. The positive human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) rate (56.3% vs. 30.5%, P = 0.003) and clinical pregnancy rate (43.8% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.017) were significantly higher in Group rsERT patients than in FET group patients. Additionally, Group rsERT patients also showed a higher implantation rate (32.1% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.104) and live birth rate (35.4% vs. 21.1%, P = 0.064) when compared with FET patients, although without significance. For subpopulation analysis, the positive β-hCG rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and live birth rate of receptive patients were not statistically significant different from those of non-receptive patients.

Conclusions

The rsERT can significantly improve the pregnancy outcomes of RIF patients, indicating the clinical potential of rsERT-guided pET.

Assessment of immune cells in the uterine fluid at the time of the embryo transfer

PROBLEM

Although endometrial receptivity is a key factor in influencing implantation in both naturally conceived and assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles, very little is known about the endometrium milieu around the time of implantation. Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of several cytokines in the endometrium that affect implantation. However, there is lacking data about the presence of immune cell subtypes within the endometrium and in the uterine cavity at the time of implantation.

METHOD OF STUDY

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (# 225589). The study was designed as a prospective observational cohort study between May 2021 and December 2022 at a single academic-based fertility center. All patients underwent at least one In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycle and have frozen embryos. Twenty-four participants were recruited for this study which was conducted during the frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle regardless of the outcome of previous cycles. Two samples were acquired from each subject, denoted as lower and upper. A trial transfer catheter was introduced under ultrasound guidance into the lower uterine segment. Upon removal, the tip was rinsed in IMDM medium containing 10% FBS (lower uterus). A transfer catheter was then loaded with the embryo that was placed in the upper uterus under ultrasound guidance. The tip of the transfer catheter was rinsed in separate aliquot of the above media (upper uterus). After centrifugation, pelleted cells were stained for the following surface markers: CD45, CD3, CD19, CD4, CD8, gamma delta TCR, CD25, CD127, CD66b, CD14, CD16, CD56 and acquired on Sony SP6800 Spectral Analyzer.

RESULTS

Upon staining the pelleted cells, we were able to identify viable leukocytes from samples obtained from both, upper and lower uterus (0.125 × 106 cells ± SD 0.32), (0.123 × 106 cells ± SD 0.12), respectively. Among total viable cells, there was no significant difference in both percent and number of CD45+ cells between the upper and lower uterus (9.88% ± 6.98 SD, 13.67% ± 9.79 SD, p = .198) respectively. However, there was significantly higher expression of CD3+ (p = .006), CD19+ (p = .032) and CD14+ (p = .019) cells in samples collected from upper compared to lower uterus. Within all CD3+ cells, we found that gamma delta T cells (GDT) were the major population of T cells in both upper and lower uterus. In contrast, CD8+ T cells were significantly higher in the lower uterus when compared to the upper uterus (p = .009). There was no statistically significant difference in the expression of CD4+ T cells, T regulatory cells (CD4+CD25+CD127-), NK cells (CD56+), neutrophils (CD66b+) and FcγRIII+ cells (CD16+) between upper and lower uterus.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe the immune milieu at the time of embryo transfer will affect implantation. Understanding the composition of immune cells will guide further research in identifying optimal immune milieus that favor implantation. Comprehensive analysis of endometrium is expected to lead to new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to improve IVF outcomes.

Single-Cell RNA Transcriptome of the Human Endometrium Reveals Epithelial Characterizations Associated with Recurrent Implantation Failure

Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) remains a complex and poorly characterized disorder despite significant advancements in assisted reproductive technology. This study utilizes single-cell transcriptome sequencing (scRNA-seq) to characterize the mid-secretory endometrium of RIF patients. Stromal fibroblast-enriched and epithelium-enriched populations are collected using a two-step dissociation process. After quality control, 25,315 individual cells from 3 RIF patients are analyzed. The analysis identifies 12 distinct cell types, including 6 subtypes of epithelial cells. Significantly, the study reveals the replacement of glandular epithelia with MAP2K6+ EPCAMDIM epithelia in the endometrial glands of RIF patients. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that endometrial gland organoids derived from RIF patients exhibit diminished responses to sex steroids compared to the controls. Single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering (SCENIC) analysis identifies cell-specific cis-regulatory elements and constructed regulatory networks in both groups, showing alterations gene-regulatory networks in RIF patients. Cell-cell communication analysis distinguishes intercellular communication between the two groups, shedding light on disrupted cellular interactions associated with RIF. In summary, these findings provide valuable insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying RIF, highlighting the roles of epithelial cells in the implantation process.

Simultaneous transfer of one good-quality and one poor-quality cleavage stage embryo does not improve pregnancy outcomes

Embryo quality and quantity are key factors that determine the success of IVF-ET. Yet it is still unclear if, for those patients with only one good-quality embryo in an IVF cycle, the inclusion of a poor-quality embryo increases the procedure's success rate. This is a common question for both clinicians and patients in determining their course of treatment. The purpose of this work was to answer this intriguing question in the context of prognosis of patients undergoing fresh cycles with only one good-quality and more than one poor-quality cleavage-stage embryos. To control for confounding effects, we only included patients at similar age, body mass index (BMI), level of basal follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and endometrial thickness from January 2015 to June 2021. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to extract the matched pairs. Then we evaluated pregnancy outcome, including the rate of clinical pregnancy, live birth, embryo implantation, early miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy. We found that the clinical pregnancy rate (34.8 vs. 38.0%, p = 0.553), live birth rate (27.1 vs. 29.9%, p = 0.598), early miscarriage rate (18.1 vs. 9.5%, p = 0.171) and ectopic pregnancy rate (1.3 vs. 1.2%, p = 1.000) did not significantly differ between those two groups, notwithstanding significant difference of the implantation rate (34.8 vs. 21.3%, p <0.001). Our work indicates that, for prognosis patients at approximately 34 years old with only one good-quality embryo, having additional poor-quality embryos does not seem to help to improve ART success rates per intended embryo transfer. In conclusion, we found that simultaneous transfer of one good-quality and one poor-quality cleavage stage embryo does not improve pregnancy outcomes.

Factors affecting the ongoing pregnancy rate in women with repeated implantation failure undergoing an endometrial receptivity array

OBJECTIVE

In this retrospective study, we analyzed factors influencing the ongoing pregnancy rate (PR) in women with repeated implantation failure (RIF) undergoing embryo transfer with endometrial receptivity array (ERA).

METHODS

Eighty-three consecutive personalized embryo transfers (pETs) with ERA, from 54 women with RIF, were selected from June 2020 to April 2022. Vitrified blastocyst transfer was timed based on ERA results.

RESULTS

The ongoing PR per pET was 33.7%. Using ERA, the endometrium was identified as pre-receptive in 26 cycles, early receptive in 25 cycles, receptive in 31 cycles, and late receptive in one cycle. With cycles categorized into three receptivity phases (pre-receptive, early receptive, or receptive), no significant differences were found in the clinical PR (27.3%, 55.6%, and 40%, respectively) or ongoing PR (9.1%, 55.6%, and 40%, respectively) after a single blastocyst transfer. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the clinical PR or ongoing PR after the transfer of two or more blastocysts. Among women with ongoing pregnancy relative to those without, age at first pET was significantly lower (35 years vs. 39 years, p=0.001), while blastocyst score (23 vs. 18, p=0.012) and the proportion of blastocyst scores >18 (71.4% vs. 38.9%, p=0.005) were significantly higher. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the woman's age (odds ratio [OR], 0.814; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.706 to 0.940; p=0.005) and blastocyst score >18 (OR, 3.052; 95% CI, 1.075 to 8.665; p=0.036) were identified as significant factors influencing ongoing pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

In pET with ERA, ongoing pregnancy was closely associated with woman's age and blastocyst quality.

Current knowledge on the role of extracellular vesicles in endometrial receptivity

Endometrial receptivity has been widely understood as the capacity of the endometrium to receive implantable embryos. The establishment of endometrial receptivity involves multiple biological processes including decidualization, tissue remodeling, angiogenesis, immune regulation, and oxidative metabolism. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid-bilayer-membrane nanosized vesicles mediating cell-to-cell communication. Recently, EVs and their cargo have been proven as functional factors in the establishment of endometrial receptivity. In this review, we comprehensively summarized the alteration of endometrium/embryo-derived EVs during the receptive phase and retrospected the current findings which revealed the pivotal role and potential mechanism of EVs to promote successful implantation. Furthermore, we highlight the potentiality and limitations of EVs being translated into clinical applications such as biomarkers of endometrial receptivity or reproductive therapeutic mediators, and point out the direction for further research.

Endometrial receptivity change: ultrasound evaluation on ovulation day and transplantation day during the natural frozen embryo transfer cycle

Objective

To obtain quantitative and comprehensive results of the changes in comprehensive ER indicators from ovulation day to transplantation day by ultrasonography during the natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle (FET).

Methods

This is a prospective analysis of 230 infertile women undergoing their first FET cycles from April 2019 to July 2021. To evaluate ER, ultrasound scans were performed on the days of ovulation and embryo transfer for all included patients. All included patients were divided into a pregnancy group and a nonpregnancy group according to whether clinical pregnancy was achieved. The ER changes from ovulation day to transplantation day in the overall study population (n=230), pregnancy group (n=158) and nonpregnancy group (n=72) were analyzed.

Results

In the overall population, type C was predominant on ovulation day, but type B was the most common on transplantation day (P<0.001). From ovulation day to transplantation day, endometrial thickness was significantly increased (11.26 ± 2.14 vs. 11.89 ± 2.08 mm, P<0.001), but endometrial volume (4.26 ± 1.75 vs. 4.03 ± 1.62 ml, P<0.001), endometrial VI (1.34 ± 1.64 vs. 0.95 ± 1.99, P<0.001), VFI (0.47 ± 0.72 vs. 0.40 ± 1.03, P<0.001), subendometrial VI (5.04 ± 3.89 vs. 3.29 ± 2.92, P<0.001), FI (34.07 ± 4.61 vs. 33.41 ± 5.30, p=0.004), VFI (2.07 ± 2.65 vs. 1.19 ± 1.19, P<0.001) and frequency of endometrial peristalsis (2.90 ± 1.44 vs. 1.40 ± 1.41, P<0.001) were significantly decreased. In the pregnancy group, the changes in all ultrasound parameters were in the same direction as those in the overall population. In the nonpregnancy group, except for endometrial volume and VI, which showed no difference, other ultrasound parameters showed the same direction of change as those in the overall population. No significant difference was found in the pregnancy probability among the different absolute change groups.

Conclusion

During a natural cycle, the morphology of the endometrium changes mostly from type C to type B, the endometrial thickness increases, and the volume decreases. The blood supply of the endometrium, the subendometrial 5 mm and the frequency of peristalsis decrease from ovulation day to transplantation day. Compared with the nonpregnancy group, the pregnancy group tended to have more obvious decreases in endometrial volume and blood flow perfusion. However, these endometrial changes do not mean that pregnancy is bound to occur. endometrial receptivity, in vitro fertilization, frozen-thawed embryo transfer, natural cycle, ultrasound evaluation, ovulation day, transplantation day.

Targeted gene expression profiling for accurate endometrial receptivity testing

Expressional profiling of the endometrium enables the personalised timing of the window of implantation (WOI). This study presents and evaluates a novel analytical pipeline based on a TAC-seq (Targeted Allele Counting by sequencing) method for endometrial dating. The expressional profiles were clustered, and differential expression analysis was performed on the model development group, using 63 endometrial biopsies spanning over proliferative (PE, n = 18), early-secretory (ESE, n = 18), mid-secretory (MSE, n = 17) and late-secretory (LSE, n = 10) endometrial phases of the natural cycle. A quantitative predictor model was trained on the development group and validated on sequenced samples from healthy women, consisting of 52 paired samples taken from ESE and MSE phases and five LSE phase samples from 31 individuals. Finally, the developed test was applied to 44 MSE phase samples from a study group of patients diagnosed with recurrent implantation failure (RIF). In validation samples (n = 57), we detected displaced WOI in 1.8% of the samples from fertile women. In the RIF study group, we detected a significantly higher proportion of the samples with shifted WOI than in the validation set of samples from fertile women, 15.9% and 1.8% (p = 0.012), respectively. The developed model was evaluated with an average cross-validation accuracy of 98.8% and an accuracy of 98.2% in the validation group. The developed beREADY screening model enables sensitive and dynamic detection of selected transcriptome biomarkers, providing a quantitative and accurate prediction of endometrial receptivity status.

Hyperandrogenism and Its Possible Effects on Endometrial Receptivity: A Review

Endometrial receptivity is a state of the endometrium defined by its readiness for embryo implantation. When the receptivity of the endometrium is impaired due to hyperandrogenism or androgen excess, this condition can lead to pregnancy loss or infertility. Hyperandrogenism encompasses a wide range of clinical manifestations, including polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), idiopathic hirsutism, hirsutism and hyperandrogaenemia, non-classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia, hyperandrogenism, insulin resistance, acanthosis nigricans (HAIR-AN), ovarian or adrenal androgen-secreting neoplasms, Cushing's syndrome, and hyperprolactinaemia. Recurrent miscarriages have been shown to be closely related to elevated testosterone levels, which alter the endometrial milieu so that it is less favourable for embryo implantation. There are mechanisms for endometrial receptivity that are affected by excess androgen. The HOXA gene, aVβ3 integrin, CDK signalling pathway, MECA-79, and MAGEA-11 were the genes and proteins affect endometrial receptivity in the presence of a hyperandrogenic state. In this review, we would like to explore the other manifestations of androgen excess focusing on causes other than PCOS and learn possible mechanisms of endometrial receptivity behind androgen excess leading to pregnancy loss or infertility.

The Role of MicroRNAs in Development of Endometrial Cancer: A Literature Review

Endometrial cancer (EC) ranks as the second most common gynaecological cancer worldwide. EC patients are diagnosed at an early clinical stage and generally have a good prognosis. Therefore, there is a dire need for development of a specific marker for early detection of endometrial adenocarcinoma. The development of EC is conditioned by a multistep process of oncogenic upregulation and tumor suppressor downregulation as shown by molecular genetic evidence. In this setting, microRNAs appear as significant regulators of gene expression and several variations in the expression of microRNAs have been implicated in normal endometrium, endometrial tissue, metrorrhagia, and endometrial cancer. Furthermore, microRNAs act as highly precise, sensitive, and robust molecules, making them potential markers for diagnosing specific cancers and their progression. With the rising incidence of EC, its management remains a vexing challenge and diagnostic methods for the disease are limited to invasive, expensive, and inaccurate tools. Therefore, the prospect of exploiting the utility of microRNAs as potential candidates for diagnosis and therapeutic use in EC seems promising.

Review of Endometrial Receptivity Array: A Personalized Approach to Embryo Transfer and Its Clinical Applications

Successful outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) rely on both the formation of a chromosomally normal embryo and its implantation in a receptive endometrium. Pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has been widely accepted as a tool to assess the viability of an embryo. In 2011, the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) was first published as a tool to determine when the endometrium is most receptive to an embryo, commonly referred to as the "window of implantation" (WOI). The ERA uses molecular arrays to assess proliferation and differentiation in the endometrium and screens for inflammatory markers. Unlike PGT-A, there has been dissent within the field concerning the efficacy of the ERA. Many studies that contest the success of the ERA found that it did not improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with an already-good prognosis. Alternatively, studies that utilized the ERA in patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF) and transfer of known euploid embryos demonstrated improved outcomes. This review aims to describe the ERA as a novel technique, review the various settings that the ERA may be used in, such as natural frozen embryo transfer (nFET) and hormone replacement therapy frozen embryo transfer (HRT-FET), and provide a summary of the recent clinical data for embryo transfers in patients with RIF utilizing the ERA.

Automation in ART: Paving the Way for the Future of Infertility Treatment

In vitro fertilisation (IVF) is estimated to account for the birth of more than nine million babies worldwide, perhaps making it one of the most intriguing as well as commoditised and industrialised modern medical interventions. Nevertheless, most IVF procedures are currently limited by accessibility, affordability and most importantly multistep, labour-intensive, technically challenging processes undertaken by skilled professionals. Therefore, in order to sustain the exponential demand for IVF on one hand, and streamline existing processes on the other, innovation is essential. This may not only effectively manage clinical time but also reduce cost, thereby increasing accessibility, affordability and efficiency. Recent years have seen a diverse range of technologies, some integrated with artificial intelligence, throughout the IVF pathway, which promise personalisation and, at least, partial automation in the not-so-distant future. This review aims to summarise the rapidly evolving state of these innovations in automation, with or without the integration of artificial intelligence, encompassing the patient treatment pathway, gamete/embryo selection, endometrial evaluation and cryopreservation of gametes/embryos. Additionally, it shall highlight the resulting prospective change in the role of IVF professionals and challenges of implementation of some of these technologies, thereby aiming to motivate continued research in this field.

Clinical outcomes of personalized blastocyst embryo transfer after endometrial receptivity analysis: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study

Purpose

To evaluate clinical outcomes after endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA).

Methods

This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study involving 861 women who underwent ERA testing at certified fertility clinics in Japan, and who received subsequent personalized blastocyst embryo transfers (ET) between 2018 and 2020. Clinical outcomes, including pregnancies, miscarriages, and live births, were evaluated according to receptivity status for ERA.

Results

Mean patient age was 37.7 years (SD = 4.0), and the median number of previous ETs was 2 (interquartile range, 2-3). 41.0% (353/861) of patients were non-receptive for ERA testing. Clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates for personalized blastocyst ET were 44.5% (226/508), 26.1% (59/226), and 26.8% (136/508) for receptive patients, and 43.1% (152/353), 28.3% (43/152), and 28.9% (102/353) for non-receptive patients, all statistically nonsignificant. Multiple logistic regression demonstrated similar nonsignificant associations between receptivity and clinical outcomes. Greater patient age, smoking, and longer duration of infertility were significantly and negatively associated with receptivity, whereas a history of delivery was positively associated and statistically significant.

Conclusions

Clinical outcomes after ERA testing were similar between receptive and non-receptive patients. Further prospective study including an appropriate comparison group are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of ERA testing.

Commercially Available Molecular Approaches to Evaluate Endometrial Receptivity: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of the Literature

Despite the advances in the field of reproductive medicine, implantation failure represents a challenging condition affecting 10-30% of patients subjected to in vitro fertilization (IVF). Research has focused on the identification of molecules playing crucial roles in endometrial receptivity, with the aim of designing predictive tools for efficient detection of the implantation window. To that end, novel molecular genomic and transcriptomic approaches have been introduced as promising tools to enable personalized approaches with the aim of optimizing embryo transfer dating. However, the clinical value of these approaches remains unclear. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic review and critical analysis of the existing evidence regarding the employment of commercially available novel approaches to evaluate endometrial receptivity. An Embase and PubMed/Medline search was performed on 1 February 2022. From the 475 articles yielded, only 27 were included and analyzed. The considerable heterogeneity of the included articles indicates the uniqueness of the implantation window, showcasing that the optimal time for embryo transfer varies significantly between women. Moreover, this study provides information regarding the technical aspects of these advanced molecular tools, as well as an analysis of novel possible biomarkers for endometrial receptivity, providing a basis for future research in the field.

P16 and P21 are involved in the pathogenesis of endometrial thinning: A cross-sectional study

P16 plays a role in the negative regulation of cell proliferation, regulating cell apoptosis to control the growth of tumor cells. P21 is a nuclear protein that suppresses DNA synthesis and inhibits cell division. This study aimed to examine the expression and roles of P16 and P21 in endometrial thinning. Thirty cases of endometrial biopsy diagnosed as endometrial thinning were assessed by p16 and p21 immunohistochemistry from March 2014 to August 2020 in Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital. Another thirty cases of normal endometrium in the same period were assessed as controls. The specimens underwent histological analysis, and P16 and P21 were assessed by immunohistochemistry. There were no statistically significant differences in age, menstrual cycle, BMI, sex hormone levels, gravidity and parity between the two groups (all P > .05). In the endometrial thinning group, P16 was expressed in the endometrial adenoid nucleus, cytolymph and interstitial cell nucleus. In the normal group, P16 was mainly expressed in the endometrial adenoid nucleus, with some P16 signals detected in the endometrial interstitial nucleus. P21 expression was mainly detected in the endometrial adenoid nucleus. P16 and P21 amounts in endometrial thinning cases were significantly lower than those of the normal endometrial group. There was no correlation between p16 and p21 amounts. This study revealed aberrant expression of P16 and P21 in the endometrium might be due to a compensatory effect of the thin endometrium to increase cell proliferation and suppress cell apoptosis. However, the pathological roles of P16 and P21 in endometrial thinning and the contribution of cell senescence deserve further investigation.

Personalized Embryo Transfer Outcomes in Recurrent Implantation Failure Patients Following Endometrial Receptivity Array With Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing

Introduction

Implantation failure is a trending problem for pregnancy outcomes. Women's reproduction rates can increase by in-vitro fertilization, which comes with frequent implantation failures. These failures can be mitigated by the personalization of embryo transfer depending on the patient's implantation window. The study aimed to assess the importance of using an endometrial receptivity array (ERA) combined with pre-implantation genetic testing in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and the significant role of personalized embryo transfer (PET) after ERA in patients with a displaced window of implantation. The study also determined the efficacy of this approach in improving clinical outcomes.

Methods

We conducted this observational retrospective study following approval by the Ethics Committee of Wings In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Women's Hospital, a unit of Reveba Infertility Clinics Pvt. Ltd., Ahmadabad (Approval No. 2019/002/31B). Two hundred ninety-one RIF patients were recruited and categorized into Group I (patients without ERA group) and Group II (ERA study group). Patients in the ERA study group were screened for ERA and subclassified into receptive and nonreceptive ERA groups. PET was performed for all subjects in the ERA study group according to their receptivity as assessed by ERA. We also screened some of the patients for ploidy (genetic) status of embryos by pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) before embryo transfer. The study had a power of 95% and an alpha of 0.05; therefore, 80 ± 2 subjects were required to conduct the study. 

Results

The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate followed by the implantation rate. We found an improved clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate (73.5% and 78.6%) in the nonreceptive endometrial group after adjusting their embryo transfer schedule to their endometrial receptivity. The clinical pregnancy rate (64% and 65%) and implantation rate (65% and 74%) in receptive and nonreceptive ERA (respectively) were high in subjects with donor oocytes for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. In addition, patients who opted for PGT-A to eliminate the risk of transferring aneuploidy embryos had significantly better implantation (88% and 95% receptive and nonreceptive, respectively) and clinical pregnancy rates (100% in both groups) compared to non-PGT-A screened patients (p<0.05; 34% and 37% clinical pregnancy rate, 96% and 57% implantation rate in receptive and nonreceptive groups, respectively).

Conclusion

Endometrial receptivity assessment is a highly beneficial method to assess the genetic expression of the endometrium and embryo transfer timing. In our study, in patients with recurrent implantation failure, this technology found receptivity issues and provided a chance to plan embryo transfer according to the window of implantation. The combination of PGT-A with ERA rules out the genetic issues related to embryos. In RIF patients, ERA results-guided PET improved the implantation rate and reproductive outcomes.

The Clinical Efficacy of Personalized Embryo Transfer Guided by the Endometrial Receptivity Array/Analysis on IVF/ICSI Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: To assess the prevalence of displaced window of implantation (WOI) in infertile women, and the clinical utility of personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by the endometrial receptivity array/analysis (ERA) on IVF/ICSI outcomes.

Methods: The protocol was registered at Prospero: CRD42020204237. We systematically searched all published English literature related to the prevalence of WOI displacement and ongoing pregnancy rate/live birth rate in the overall good-prognosis infertile patients (GPP) and/or repeated implantation failure (RIF) patients undergoing IVF/ICSI-ET cycles after ERA test until August 2021.

Result(s): 11 published studies were enrolled in the final analysis. The estimate of the incidence of WOI displacement based on ERA was 38% (95%CI 19–57%) in GPP and 34% (95%CI 24–43%) in RIF, respectively. There was no difference in OPR/LBR between patients undergoing routine ET without ERA test and those who following pET with ERA (39.5 vs. 53.7%, OR 1.28, p = 0.49, 95%CI 0.92–1.77, I² = 0%) in relative GPP. Notably, the meta-analysis revealed that OPR/LBR of patients with RIF undergoing pET who had non-receptive ERA increased to the level of to those undergoing sET with receptive ERA (40.7 vs.49.6%, OR 0.94, p = 0.85, 95%CI 0.70–1.26, I² = 0%).

Conclusion: Considering the approximately one third of infertile women could suffered from displaced WOI, the ERA test emerged as a promising tool. Although the present meta-analysis demonstrates that patients with general good-prognosis may not benefit from ERA, pET guided by ERA significantly increases the chances of pregnancy for non-receptive patients with RIF of endometrial origin.

Effectiveness of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors on the treatment of thin endometrium and pregnancy outcomes: An systematic review

Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors are thought to play a role in increasing endometrial thickness and increasing the success rate of pregnancy outcomes. This study was done to investigate the effects of PDE5 inhibitors on infertile women with thin endometrium and pregnancy outcomes. In this systematic review, all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were retrieved from databases including Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), PubMed, and Scopus by interesting keywords. A checklist was designed to collect necessary data and pregnancy outcomes, and the required items were recorded. PDE5 inhibitors through various mechanisms such as induction of vasodilatory effect through the effect on NO/cGMP signaling on vascular smooth muscle, through regulating cells proliferation and induction angiogenesis by increasing the expression of tumor suppressor factor (p53), and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and downregulating inflammation by downregulating proinflammatory cytokines, affect endometrial thickness that eventually increases and pregnancy outcomes. Although PDE5s inhibitors increase endometrial thickness by different mechanisms, especially in women with thin endometrial, this does not necessarily mean that they induce a positive effect in all situations. However, their positive effects on pregnancy outcome may be affected by the time of administration, type of infertility treatment, underlying diseases such as pelvic disorders and inflammation. So in this regard, there are still ambiguous aspects that required further RCTs study in this area.

Non-Invasive and Mechanism-Based Molecular Assessment of Endometrial Receptivity During the Window of Implantation: Current Concepts and Future Prospective Testing Directions

Suboptimal endometrial receptivity and altered embryo-endometrial crosstalk account for approximately two-thirds of human implantation failures. Current tests of the window of implantation, such as endometrial thickness measurements and the endometrial receptivity assay, do not consistently improve clinical outcomes as measured by live birth rates. Understanding the mechanisms regulating the endometrial receptivity during the window of implantation is a critical step toward developing clinically meaningful tests. In this narrative review, the available literature is evaluated regarding mechanisms that regulate the endometrial receptivity during the window of implantation and the current tests developed. Overall, both animal and human studies point to five possible and interrelated mechanisms regulating the endometrial window of implantation: suitable synchrony between endometrial cells, adequate synchrony between the endometrium and the embryo, standard progesterone signaling and endometrial responses to progesterone, silent genetic variations, and typical morphological characteristics of the endometrial glands. The biological basis of current clinical markers or tests of window of implantation is poor. Future studies to elucidate the mechanisms shaping the window of implantation and to investigate the potential markers based on these mechanisms are required. In addition, molecular testing of the endometrium at single-cell resolution should be an initial step toward developing clinically meaningful tests for the optimal window of implantation. As understanding of the optimal window of implantation continues to evolve, one can envision the future development of non-invasive, mechanism-based testing of the window of implantation.

The clinical efficiency of transcriptome-based endometrial receptivity assessment (Tb-ERA) in Chinese patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF): A study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

Today, approximately 10% of participants in assisted reproductive technology (ART) are defined as having recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Recent studies show that endometrial receptivity array can improve pregnancy and implantation rates by nearly 20% in women with RIF. However, these studies are limited, with little published data in the Chinese population. Recently, we have established a transcriptome-based endometrial receptivity assessment (Tb-ERA) method of predicting the endometrial window of implantation (WOI) using transcriptome-profiling data of different phases of the menstrual cycle from healthy fertile Chinese women by RNA-Seq. It is meaningful to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the clinical efficiency of Tb-ERA in Chinese patients with RIF.

Methods

In this RCT, a total of 200 RIF patients will be recruited and randomized into 2 groups. Patients in the Tb-ERA group will undergo a Tb-ERA test, after which embryo transfer time will be adjusted according to Tb-ERA results and embryo transfer will be performed again in the next cycle. Patients in the control group will not receive any interventions until the next transfer cycle. We will perform statistical analysis on both groups at the primary endpoint (clinical-pregnancy rate) and at secondary endpoints (rate of WOI displacement, embryo implantation, biochemical pregnancy, early abortion, and ectopic pregnancy). Implications: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of our Tb-ERA test in Chinese RIF patients and to determine that whether Tb-ERA could improve the clinical-pregnancy rate in these RIF patients.

Trial registration

NCT04497558, registered August 4, 2020.

The efficacy of add-ons: selected IVF "add-on" procedures and future directions

Since the advent of ART, technology has continuously evolved to improve embryology and pregnancy outcomes. However, not all technologies that are integrated into practice have convincing evidence of clinical effectiveness, and they often increase the financial burden of fertility care. We discuss here a selection of commonly utilized IVF "add-ons" and discuss the existing evidence for their utility. The procedures included in this review are time-lapse imaging of embryos, assisted hatching, EmbryoGlue, sperm DNA testing, egg activation with calcium ionophore, endometrial receptivity array, and physiological intracytoplasmic sperm injection (PICSI). While there is rather limited supporting evidence for nearly all IVF add-ons that we reviewed, there is strong demand from patients, physicians, and the biotechnology industry to continue further research and development in this arena. We propose that all add-on procedures should provide true efficacy for the patient, and reproductive endocrinologists should inform patients of the costs and benefits of utilizing various technologies before they undergo treatment. In the future, add-ons that show clear evidence of efficacy and justifiable cost should be incorporated into routine practice, while others that do not meet these criteria should be phased out entirely.

The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population

Displaced window of implantation (WOI) is one of the endometrial origins that accounts for implantation failure, especially for patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF), yet no standard diagnostic tool has been recognized. The study consists of two parts, aiming to compare the concordance and efficacy of the diagnostic tools, the newly developed RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) to the conventional pinopode, in diagnosing WOI and guiding personalized embryo transfer (pET). With the same group of RIF patients, the rsERT diagnosed 32 patients (65.31%) with normal WOIs, and most of the displacements were advancements (30.61%). While according to pinopode, only 14 patients (28.57%) were found with normal WOIs, and most patients (63.27%) presented delayed growth patterns. After conducting pET, patients in the rsERT group had higher successful pregnancy rates while requiring fewer ET cycles (50.00% vs. 16.67%, p=0.001). The study proved poor consistency between the diagnostic tools of endometrial receptivity based on cellular structure and gene profiling, and it supported rsERT as a reliable tool with potential clinical value.

Clinical relevance of a newly developed endometrial receptivity test for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Japan

Purpose

To assess the clinical efficacy of personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by a new endometrial receptivity test, ERPeakSM, in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF).

Methods

Recurrent implantation failure patients of all ages at two private Japanese clinics from April 2019 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The intervention group (n = 244) received pET in accordance with endometrial receptivity testing results and was compared to control group (n = 306) receiving standardized timing, non-personalized embryo transfer (npET). In propensity score matching analysis, the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) were compared between groups, and a subanalysis of advanced maternal age (AMA) (≥38 years old) versus non-AMA (<38 years old) patients was also conducted.

Results

The CPR and LBR of the pET group were significantly higher than those of the npET group (37.7% vs. 20.0%, adjusted OR: 2.64; 95%CI, 1.70-4.11, p < 0.001 and 29.9% vs. 9.7%, adjusted OR: 4.13; 95%CI, 2.40-7.13, p < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, in the subanalyses, the CPR and LBR of the pET group were significantly higher than those of the npET group in both the AMA non-AMA patients.

Conclusions

The new ERPeakSM endometrial receptivity test is a useful alternative diagnostic tool for poor-prognosis patients, regardless of age.

Human implantation: The complex interplay between endometrial receptivity, inflammation, and the microbiome

Human embryo implantation is an intricate spatiotemporal process that involves the intimate association between the embryo and the endometrium of the mother. During implantation, the endometrium undergoes a dynamic cascade of gene activation and repression, largely driven by autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine action. Steroid hormones, such as estrogen and progesterone, act on a variety of targets including cellular adhesion molecules (CAMs), cytokines, and growth factors to facilitate the implantation process. Given the synchrony required to achieve implantation, it is unsurprising that embryo implantation represents a substantial problem for infertility patients. This is due to a complex interplay taking place at the level of the endometrium. This review discusses the intricacies of embryo implantation including the window of implantation, the cyclical phases of the endometrium, the implantation process itself, and features of endometrial receptivity. Additionally, we will discuss new research regarding inflammatory reproductive biology, epigenetics and microRNA, and the role of the vaginal and endometrial microbiome in implantation. A better understanding of embryo implantation and the interactions occurring at the level of the blastocyst and the endometrium will improve patient care for infertile patients who experience this frustrating challenge.

A survey study of endometrial receptivity tests and immunological treatments in in vitro fertilisation (IVF)

BACKGROUND

Suboptimal endometrial receptivity is a key factor behind in vitro fertilisation (IVF) implantation failure. Direct clinical tests of the endometrium of natural killer (NK) cells and endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) are controversial.

AIMS

To examine the current practice of endometrial receptivity tests (NK cells and ERA) and immunological treatments (corticosteroids, anticoagulants, antiplatelets, intravenous immunoglobulin, Intralipid, other) among fertility specialists in Australia and New Zealand.

METHODS

A prospective 23-item web-based survey was distributed by email via the Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand, between August and October 2020. Data were collected and analysed using Qualtrics.

RESULTS

Of 238 fertility specialists, 90 completed the survey (response rate 37.8%). ERA (48/90, 53.3%) was most commonly ordered, followed by uterine NK (uNK) (36/90, 40.0%) and peripheral blood NK (pNK) (12/90, 13.3%). For all tests, the most common indication was recurrent implantation failure (RIF) (41/48, 22/36, 6/12; 85.4%, 61.1%, and 50.0%, respectively for ERA, uNK and pNK). Of those that did not offer these tests, the main reason cited was insufficient evidence (30/42, 47/54, 68/78; 71.4%, 87.0%, and 87.0%). A third of specialists offered empirical immunological treatment for RIF (30/90, 33.3%): anticoagulants (28/30, 93.3%), antiplatelets (27/30, 90.0%), and corticosteroids (25/30; 83.3%). The majority of specialists (56/90, 62.2%) stated they had refused a patient request for endometrial testing or treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Tests for presumed endometrial receptivity pathology are often used in Australia and New Zealand. Immunological treatments for RIF are commonly employed empirically, without strong evidence of their effectiveness or safety. Further studies should focus on education and clinical adherence to evidence-based guidelines.

Human menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells regulation of the EGF/Ras p21 pathway as a potential therapeutic target for thin endometrium

Background

Human infertility is caused by many factors, among which thin endometrium is the main reason for poor embryo implantation. Currently, stem cell therapy could be a potential approach in treating human endometrial disorder like thin endometrium. In this study, we aimed to explore the influence of menstrual stem cells from non-thin endometrium (NTE-MenSCs) and thin endometrium (TE-MenSCs) on the phenotype of endometrial epithelial cells (EECs).

Methods

The MenSCs were isolated from women with and without thin endometria, characterized and co-cultured with the EECs. The expression of cytokeratin 7 (CK7) was verified by immunofluorescence while the detection stem cell markers was determined flow cytometry. Osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation were induced in appropriate media. The quantitative real-time PCR and western blotting were respectively used for detecting the mRNA and protein expression levels, respectively. The CCK-8 assay was used for cell viability analysis whereas ELISA was used for the detection of cytokine levels.

Results

The results showed that the co-culture of NTE-MenSCs or TE-MenSCs and EECs promoted the proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis of endothelial progenitor cells differently. Furthermore, the TE-MenSCs promoted the expression of inflammation, vascularized adipose, and extracellular matrix related proteins. The epidermal growth factor (EGF)/Ras p21 pathway was found to mediate the influence of MenSCs on EECs.

Conclusions

These findings are vital in that they may promote stem cell therapy of thin endometrium and enable embryo implantation in humans with thin endometrium.

Effect of endometrial thickness changes on clinical pregnancy rates after progesterone administration in a single frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer cycle using natural cycles with luteal support for PGT-SR- and PGT-M-assisted reproduction: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To investigate whether the endometrial thickness change ratio from the progesterone administration day to the blastocyst transfer day is associated with pregnancy outcomes in a single frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer cycle.

METHODS

All patients used natural cycles with luteal support for endometrial preparation and selected a single euploid blastocyst for transfer after a biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing. The endometrial thickness was measured by transvaginal ultrasound on the progesterone administration day and the transfer day, the change in endometrial thickness was measured, and the endometrial thickness change ratio was calculated. According to the change rate of endometrial thickness, the patients were divided into three groups: the endometrial thickness compaction group, endometrial thickness non-change group and endometrial thickness expansion group. Among them, the endometrial thickness non-change and expansion groups were combined into the endometrial thickness noncompaction group.

RESULTS

Ultrasound images of the endometrium in 219 frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer cycles were evaluated. The clinical pregnancy rate increased with the increase in endometrial thickness change ratio, while the miscarriage rate and live birth rate were comparable among the groups. The multiple logistic regression results showed that in the fully adjusted model a higher endometrial thickness change ratio (per 10%) was associated with a higher clinical pregnancy rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.64; P = .040). Similarly, when the patients were divided into three groups according to the change rate of endometrial thickness, the endometrial thickness noncompaction group had a significant positive effect on the clinical pregnancy rate compared with the endometrial thickness compaction group after adjusting for all covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

In frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer cycles in which the endometrium was prepared by natural cycles with luteal support, the clinical pregnancy rate was higher in cycles without endometrial compaction after progesterone administration.

Sildenafil Supplementation for Women Undergoing Infertility Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize data on the effectiveness of Sildenafil supplementation for women undergoing assisted reproduction techniques. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluates the effects of Sildenafil administration during infertility treatments compared with a control group in infertile women. Outcomes evaluated were endometrial thickness (ETh) and the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). The chemical pregnancy rate (ChPR) was also evaluated. Pooled results were expressed as the risk ratio (RR) or mean differences (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Women undergoing ovulation induction who received Sildenafil showed higher ETh and a higher CPR in comparison to controls. In this group, both the ETh and ChPR resulted in significantly higher values only with delayed start administration. Women undergoing fresh or frozen embryo transfer who received Sildenafil showed no significant advantages regarding ETh and CPR in comparison to controls. In this group, we found a significantly higher ChPR in women receiving Sildenafil. A subgroup analysis revealed significant advantages regarding ETh with oral administration for women undergoing fresh or frozen embryo transfer. Sildenafil therapy appears to improve endometrial thickness and pregnancy rate in women undergoing timed intercourses but it resulted not effective in IUI and IVF treatments. Further RCTs with rigorous methodology are still mandatory.

The Effect of Ascorbic Acid on Interleukin-10 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Cytokines in Rattus norvegicus with Endometritis

BACKGROUND: Endometritis is a gynecological disease characterized by inflammation of the endometrial glands and stroma. Inflammatory stimuli or tissue injury induce inflammatory pain through the release of cytokines. Ascorbic acid (AA) is a water-soluble Vitamin that plays a role in inhibiting the production of proinflammatory cytokines and increases the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines. AIM: The purpose of this study was to find out the association between administration of AA and inflammatory cytokines in experimental animals Rattus norvegicus with endometritis. METHODS: The research was conducted using virgin female R. norvegicus laboratory mice weighing 250–300 g and aged 11–12 weeks with an estrus cycle of 5–6 days. Mice with regular oestrous cycles were randomly divided into three groups: group 1 was given 200 L of water orally without Escherichia coli inoculation and represented a negative control. Groups 2 and 3 were inoculated (50 L/rat) E. coli intravaginally, 106 colony-forming unit/mL, Group 2 was not given AA and the other side Group 3 was assigned AA. The interleukin (IL)-10 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α _cytokines examination was carried out by histopathological examination through a biopsy of the endometrial tissue. Hypothesis testing on the data was analyzed by the Kruskal Wallis test using Statistical Package for Social Sciences. RESULTS: Data from the current study revealed that the highest mean value of IL-10 was found in the negative control group (2.5) and the lowest value in the positive control group (1.3). Regarding TNF-α _the highest mean value (2.8) was found in the treatment group and the lowest mean value (2.1) was found in the treatment group. Using the Kruskal Wallis test, IL-10 and TNF-α _showed insignificant results (p = value 0.304 and 0.145 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of AA did not affect the decrease in TNF-α _or the upregulation of IL-10 as anti-inflammatory cytokines.

Endometrial Receptivity Testing and Therapy in Assisted Reproductive Treatment

Assisted reproductive treatment (ART) gave numerous couples the chance to have their biological child. Improvement in laboratory and culture conditions allows for selection of embryos with the best developmental potential, although replacement of these top-quality embryos does not, however, guarantee reproductive success. Endometrial receptivity is essential for pregnancy establishment and may be the limiting factor for the observed pregnancy rates with ART. Multiple modalities have been in use to assess endometrial receptivity, with ultrasound assessment of the endometrial morphology most commonly used due to its noninvasive nature and availability. Utilization of various "omics" increases our understanding of endometrial receptivity and selectivity; however, significantly more work is required to develop clinically relevant and validated tests of endometrial receptivity and treatments which could improve a suboptimal endometrial milieu. Current evidence for and against use of various tests of endometrial receptivity in women undergoing ART is presented in this article.

A comparative evaluation of subendometrial and intrauterine platelet-rich plasma treatment for women with recurrent implantation failure

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of treatment with autologous activated platelet-rich plasma (PRP), administered to either the subendometrium (SE-PRP) or endometrial surface (intrauterine; IU-PRP), against controls.

DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary fertility unit.

PATIENTS

Women aged <40 years with a history of recurrent implantation failure undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET) (n = 318).

INTERVENTIONS

In SE-PRP, PRP was injected into the subendometrial space transvaginally in the luteal phase of the previous cycle of embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance (n = 55). In IU-PRP, PRP was administered during the index FET cycle when the endometrium was approximately 7 mm (n = 109). Both SE-PRP and IU-PRP groups were administered 300 μg of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) subcutaneously once a day for 3 days to boost white blood cells (WBC) and growth factor production in the PRP sample. The control group consisted of women who did not choose PRP treatment and underwent standard FET with no intervention (n = 154).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Ongoing pregnancy rate or live birth rate (OPR/LBR) per transfer cycle, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per transfer cycle, and miscarriage rate.

RESULTS

As a result, OPR/LBR was higher in the SE-PRP (22/55, 40%) and IU-PRP (45/109, 41.3%) groups than that in the control group (34/154, 22.1%). It was similar between the SE-PRP and IU-PRP groups. Moreover, CPR showed a similar trend with a higher rate in the SE-PRP (28/55, 51%) and IU-PRP (57/109, 52.3%) groups than that in the controls (52/154, 33.8%). No statistical difference in the CPR was noted between the SE-PRP and IU-PRP groups. The miscarriage rate was similar in all three groups (14/55, 25.45%; 25/109, 22.23%; and 34/154, 22.07%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In women with a history of recurrent implantation failure, PRP treatment appears to improve FET outcome with an increase in OPR/LBR. However, SE-PRP treatment does not offer any advantage over lesser invasive IU-PRP treatment.

Inconsistencies between endometrial receptivity assay (ERA) and Adhesio-RT test for the window of implantation in women with repetitive failed donor oocyte embryo transfers

Two commercially available second-generation endometrial receptivity assays using microarray analysis or next-generation sequencing are available in the market: endometrial receptivity assay (ERA) (Igenomix Laboratories) and Adhesio RT (OVO laboratories, Montreal, Canada). Little is known about how the results of these tests compare. We present a case of a subject with repetitive failed donor oocyte embryo transfer, who underwent evaluation of endometrial receptivity using both the Adhesio and ERA tests. These two tests did not provide consistent results, with ERA suggesting receptivity on day 5 of progesterone treatment and Adhesio suggesting receptivity on the eighth day. An ERA test subsequently performed on the eighth day of progesterone treatment was suggestive of post-receptive endometrium during the same time frame that Adhesio was suggestive of receptive endometrium. In conclusion, it is important to note that these two tests may not provide consistent results in at least some subjects. Therefore, intertest validity studies are recommended.

Evaluation of Pregnancy Outcomes of Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfer before and after Endometrial Receptivity Analysis in Identical Patients with Recurrent Implantation Failure

Background: The clinical value of personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by the endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) tests for recurrent implantation failure (RIF) cases is still unclear. The aim of this study is to clarify the efficacy of ERA leading to personalization of the day of embryo transfer (ET) in RIF patients.

Methods: A retrospective study was performed for 94 patients with RIF who underwent ERA between July 2015 and December 2019. Pregnancy outcomes in a previous vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (previous VBT) and a personalized vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (pVBT) in identical patients were compared. The details of each pVBT were further analyzed between patients in a non-displaced group, which indicated “receptive” cases in ERA results and those who were in the displaced group, which indicated “non-receptive” cases.

Results: When the pregnancy rate, both per patient and per transfer cycle, of previous VBT and pVBT were compared, a significant increase in pVBT was observed between the two methods (5.3% vs. 62.8%, 4.4% vs. 47.9%, respectively). The pregnancy rates, implantation rates, and clinical pregnancy rates of the first pVBT were significantly higher in the displaced group than the non-displaced group. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate of the displaced group tended to be higher compared to that of the non-displaced group in the first pVBT, although the difference was not statistically significant (51.0% vs. 31.1%, [Formula: see text] = 0.06).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that pVBT guided by ERA tests may improve pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients whose window of implantation (WOI) is displaced, and its effect may be more pronounced at the first pVBT. The displacement of WOI may be considered to be one of the causes of RIF, and its adjustment may contribute to the improvement of pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients.

The precise determination of the window of implantation significantly improves ART outcomes

The human endometrium is receptive to the embryo for a specific period of time known as the window of implantation (WOI). During this period, the endometrium shows a specific gene expression profile suitable for endometrial function evaluation. ER Map is a molecular tool able to accurately predict endometrial receptivity status by transcriptomic analysis. In this retrospective study, including 2256 subfertile patients undergoing ART treatment, the clinical value of precise WOI determination is studied in detail. Results obtained when single embryo transfers (sET) were scheduled either within the WOI timeframe as established by ER Map, or deviating from this WOI, are assessed and compared. Data obtained showed that 34.18% (771/2256) of patients had a displaced WOI. Analysis of ART outcomes showed significantly higher pregnancy rates in transfers scheduled within the WOI predicted compared to transfers that deviated more than 12h from this WOI (44.35% vs 23.08%, p < 0.001). The deviation from the WOI had also an impact on the progression of pregnancy, with a significant increase in pregnancy loss (~ twofold) observed in transfers that deviated more than 12h from the WOI predicted. These results indicate that the precise determination of the WOI and personalised embryo transfer can significantly improve clinical outcomes.

Current biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis

A clinically reliable non-invasive test for endometriosis is expected to reduce the diagnostic delay. Although varieties of biomarkers have been investigated for decades, and cancer antigen-125, cancer antigen-199, interleukin-6, and urocortin were the most studied ones among hundreds of biomarkers, no clinically reliable biomarkers have been confirmed so far. Some emerging technologies including “omics” technologies, molecular imaging techniques, and microRNAs are promising in solving these challenges, but their utility to detect endometriosis has yet to be verified. New combinations of researched indicators or other non-invasive methods and further exploration of the emerging technologies may be new targets and future research hotspots for non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. In conclusion, researches of biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis are still ongoing and may benefit from novel molecular biology, bioinformatics methods and a combination of more diverse monitoring methods. Though it will be a daunting task, the identification of a specific set of diagnostic biomarkers will undoubtedly improve the status of endometriosis.

Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA) test: an unproven technology

This article addresses the limitations of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) methodology to increase implantation. Such limitations vary from the assumed inconsistency of the endometrial biopsy, the variable number of genes found to be dysregulated in endometrium samples without the embryonal-induced effect, the failure to account for the simultaneous serum progesterone level, and the expected low percentage of patients who may need this add-on procedure, to the difficulties in synchronising the endometrium with hormone replacements in successive cycles and the inherent perinatal risks associated with routine cryopreservation of embryos. Without a gold standard to compare, the claim that the window of implantation (WOI) might be off by ±12 h only requires a good argument for the advantage it provides to human procreation, knowing that embryos can linger for days before actual embedding starts and that the window is actually a few days. The intra-patient variations in the test need to be addressed. In summary, like all other add-ons, it is doubtful whether the ERA test use can significantly enhance implantation success rates.

Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA): data versus opinions

This article summarises and contextualises the accumulated basic and clinical data on the ERA test and addresses specific comments and opinions presented by the opponent as part of an invited debate. Progress in medicine depends on new technologies and concepts that translate to practice to solve long-standing problems. In a key example, combining RNA sequencing data (transcriptomics) with artificial intelligence (AI) led to a clinical revolution in personalising disease diagnosis and fostered the concept of precision medicine. The reproductive field is no exception. Translation of endometrial transcriptomics to the clinic yielded an objective definition of the limited time period during which the maternal endometrium is receptive to an embryo, known as the window of implantation (WOI). The WOI is induced by the presence of exogenous and/or endogenous progesterone (P) after proper oestradiol (E2) priming. The window lasts 30-36 hours and, depending on the patient, occurs between LH + 6 and LH + 9 in natural cycles or between P + 4 and P + 7 in hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) cycles. In approximately 30% of IVF cycles in which embryo transfer is performed blindly, the WOI is displaced and embryo-endometrial synchrony is not achieved. Extending this application of endometrial transcriptomics, the endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) test couples next-generation sequencing (NGS) to a computational predictor to identify transcriptomic signatures for each endometrial stage: proliferative (PRO), pre-receptive (PRE), receptive (R) and post-receptive (POST). In this way, personalised embryo transfer (pET) may be possible by synchronising embryo transfer with each patient's WOI. Data are the only way to confront arguments sustained in opinions and/or misleading concepts; it is up to the reader to make their own conclusions regarding its clinical utility.

Low-dose aspirin treatment improves endometrial receptivity in the midluteal phase in unexplained recurrent implantation failure

OBJECTIVE

To compare endometrial receptivity in patients with and without unexplained recurrent implantation failure (URIF) and the benefits of low-dose aspirin treatment in women with URIF.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai, from January 2014 to January 2017. Endometrial thickness, pulsatility index (PI), resistive index (RI), and systolic-to-diastolic ratio (S/D) values of endometrial and uterine perfusion were recorded and compared between women with and without URIF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the risk of URIF. Ultrasonography examination was repeated after 2 months of treatment with low-dose aspirin.

RESULTS

PI, RI, and S/D values for endometrial blood flow were significantly higher in URIF patients than the control group (P < 0.001). The predictive indexes were 0.833, 0.857, and 0.839, respectively. Differences between the groups for endometrial thickness and impedance of uterine perfusion were not significant (P > 0.05). After low-dose aspirin treatment, endometrial and uterine arterial blood flow resistance in URIF patients was significantly lower than before treatment (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

URIF patients had inappropriate endometrial blood flow. Doppler parameters are promising for predicting women at high risk of URIF. Low-dose aspirin treatment can improve endometrial receptivity.